Next Article in Journal
The Promising Shadow of Nanohybrid Liposomal Cerasomes towards the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus
Previous Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medical Sciences Forum
Volume 17
Issue 1
10.3390/msf2022017011
msf-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Carlos Sequeira
1,2,*,
Olga Ribeiro
1,2,
Francisco Sampaio
1,2 and
Wilson Abreu
1
1
Nursing School of Porto (ESEP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
2
CINTESIS@RISE, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the International Congress of Research in Nursing ESEP 2022, Porto, Portugal, 14–15 July 2022.
Med. Sci. Forum 2022, 17(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022017011
Published: 10 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The International Congress of Research in Nursing ESEP 2022)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Medical Sciences Forum, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review as administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to meet the professional and scientific standard that is expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: double-blind.
  • Conference submission management system: all correspondence related to submissions and review processes was managed by e-mail.
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 15.
  • Number of submissions accepted: 10.
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 66.7%.
  • Average number of reviews per paper: two revisions.
  • Total number of reviewers involved: thirteen reviewers.
  • Any additional information on the review process: all authors proceeded with all the adjustments suggested by the reviewers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sequeira, C.; Ribeiro, O.; Sampaio, F.; Abreu, W. Statement of Peer Review. Med. Sci. Forum 2022, 17, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022017011

AMA Style

Sequeira C, Ribeiro O, Sampaio F, Abreu W. Statement of Peer Review. Medical Sciences Forum. 2022; 17(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022017011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sequeira, Carlos, Olga Ribeiro, Francisco Sampaio, and Wilson Abreu. 2022. "Statement of Peer Review" Medical Sciences Forum 17, no. 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022017011

APA Style

Sequeira, C., Ribeiro, O., Sampaio, F., & Abreu, W. (2022). Statement of Peer Review. Medical Sciences Forum, 17(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022017011

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop