Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Rotor Geometry for Setting up Numerical Model of Flow in Refining Ladle
Previous Article in Journal
Visual Analytics Enabling Optimisation of Downtime
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Performance Analysis of Batik Solo Trans Corridor-6 Services †

1
Center for Transportation Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Sukoharjo 57169, Indonesia
2
Civil Engineering Study Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Sukoharjo 57169, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 7th Mechanical Engineering, Science and Technology International Conference, Surakarta, Indonesia, 21–22 December 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 63(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024063009
Published: 27 February 2024

Abstract

:
The development of public transport in Surakarta City can be seen from the existence of Batik Solo Trans Corridor-6. This route passes through several types of land uses so that the passengers are very diverse. This article is focused on analyzing the user characteristics and their assessment of the service performance and operations. The data required consist of: bus arrival/departure time, number of passengers getting on/off, distance between stops, number of passengers, and occupancy rate. Data were collected by distributing questionnaires offline on the bus to obtain respondents. The performance analysis refers to the Minister of Transportation Regulation, and the World Bank. The analysis results show that the majority of respondents were female, aged 15–25 years, and students. Other results show that most BST users change modes once, using private vehicles and walking, and come from the Timuran to the Al Islam High School Bus Stop. Operational parameters that meet the standards are headway, travel speed, and stopping time, while those that do not meet the standards are the load factor and travel time. However, the respondent satisfaction level obtained was 76.78%. This value states that the service is still in the good category according to what is felt when using the service.

1. Introduction

Transportation is the process of physically moving people/goods from one place to another, either using or without transport mode [1]. The development of transportation has made it easier for human mobility for various reasons including social economic activities [2,3]. This development is influenced by several factors such as environmental, historical, technological, and political economic factors, and society’s demands for global transportation [4,5,6]. Massive developments and with changing times have made means of transportation increasingly modern and sophisticated, one of which is public transportation [7].
Based on Law No. 22 of 2009 [8], public motorized vehicles are defined as any vehicle used to transport goods and people for a fee. Its existence needs to be implemented in order to provide good and appropriate transportation services for the community [9]. Public transportation is one of the factors that plays an important role in the movement of traffic flows in a place and the social and economic development of a region [10]. One of the regions in Indonesia that has rapid economic growth is Surakarta. In 2022, this city recorded economic growth of 6.25%, which was higher than the Indonesian average of 5.31% [11].
Surakarta/Solo is the most populous city in Central Java. This is proven by the population of 522,728 people in 2021 within an area of 46 km2. Population density in this city reaches 11,363.65 people/km2, compared to a density of 4431.92 people/km2 in Semarang [12,13]. This development cannot be understood separately from the support of the transportation sector which facilitates connections between regions. This city is among those developing integrated public transportation, namely the BST route with Balapan Station and Adisumarmo Airport. It is hoped that the procurement of BST can improve the quality of services to the people in this city [14].
The performance of a transportation system can be considered from many perspectives, including those of engineers, economists, managers, planners, and definitely from those of travelers or users [15]. Regarding public transportation, the differences in perception are grouped into three, i.e., users, operators, and government [16]. The performance in question is the ability of public transportation to operate or serve users. Minimum service standards on routes constitute the requirements for the implementation of public transportation regarding the type and quality of service received by each user of transportation services [17]. The optimal service is generally the hope desired by the community. Some of the desired performance parameters are comfort, security, and speed [18].
PT. Batik Solo Trans is the party responsible for BST Bus operations. Bus Friends is an online application from the Ministry of Transportation which was launched in June 2020. This application, TEMAN BUS, was created to provide economical, easy, reliable, and comfortable transportation for the Indonesian people [19,20]. Currently, PT BST operates six main corridors with a fleet of buses. Based on observations of land use around Corridor-6 in the form of hospitals, schools, markets, universities, hotels, and so on, the number of passengers is varied [7]. Based on the description above, this research needs to be carried out to identify user characteristics and their assessment of the corridor’s service performance, as well as its operational performance. It is hoped that this research can be used as material for consideration by related agencies and as reference material for similar research.

2. Research Methods

The object of this research is the bus of Batik Solo Trans Corridor-6 in Surakarta City, which has a capacity of 20 seats. Currently, the fare applied to the general public is IDR 3700, while for students and people with disabilities, the fare is IDR 2000. This corridor starts from Tirtonadi Bus Station and goes to Solo-Baru, the route of which can be seen in Figure 1.
The primary data obtained comprise the vehicle user and operational characteristics, as well as answers to questions regarding the transportation service. The questionnaire used to search for respondent assessment data was previously tested for validity and reliability, the results of which can be seen in Table 1. Data obtained from other related agencies are: the average number of passengers per day and the monthly occupancy rate from the Surakarta City Transportation Service and PT. Bengawan Solo Trans, Surakarta, Indonesia.
Performance analysis is based on Minister of Transportation Decree SK.687 [22], Minister of Transportation Regulation PM 10 [23], and the World Bank [24]. Data collection was carried out offline on the bus with the respondents being passengers in the corridor. The characteristics of the respondents reviewed were: age, gender, occupation, origin and destination of passengers, number of mode changes, and modes used before and after.
Based on Table 1, it can be seen that all calculated r-calculated values are greater than r-table. This shows that all question items are valid and can be used as research instruments. The results of the reliability test for the variables used have a Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.841 or greater than 0.6, so they are said to be reliable to use.

2.1. Operational Performance

The operational performance parameters of public transport used consist of load factor, headway, speed, travel time, and delay. Load factor (LF) is a comparison between the number of passengers and the number of available seats expressed in percentage. The standardized value to obtain balanced operational conditions is 70%.
Headway (H) is the time interval between two consecutive buses which is usually determined at terminal gates and bus stops. The standard value is 5–10 min for ideal conditions and 2–3 min for peak hours. This value can be calculated from the difference between the arrival times of the second fleet (T2) and the first (T1), as shown in Equation (1).
H = T2 − T1
Speed is the rate of movement of a vehicle expressed in kilometers per hour. The standard value during peak hours is 30 km/h, while the standard value during off-peak hours is 60 km/h. Travel time (TT) is the time required for each transport fleet to complete the journey from the terminal of origin to the destination with an average value of 1–1.5 h and a maximum of 2–3 h. Stopping time (ST) is the time for which the bus stops at each shelter or bus stop. The standard value is 45 s during peak hours and 60 s at during off-peak hours.

2.2. Satisfaction Level Assessment

The level of passenger satisfaction is a measure of the satisfaction of each passenger when using public transportation. This was obtained from a direct survey of Corridor-6 BST users. The data obtained are the result of a questionnaire that was given to users. All the data are then processed by multiplying each answer weight by the predetermined points. The total respondent achievement value from the assessment results is adjusted based on the respondent achievement level (RAL) value. Adopted from Sahlan in [25], the classification of the achievement levels in this case can be seen in Table 2.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Passenger Characteristics

The characteristics of BST passengers can be identified according to the results of the completed questionnaire. The proposed criteria are gender, age, occupation, passenger’s origin and destination, and the mode used before using public transport as seen in Figure 2 and Figure 3, and Table 3.
Based on Table 3 as well as Figure 2 and Figure 3, it can be seen that the majority of respondents who use this transportation are female (61%), aged 15–25 years (44%), and are students (40%). Moreover, 78% only made one modal change, with walking and using private vehicles constituting 36% each. The majority of respondents’ came from the Timuran Bus Stop (16%), and the most common destination was the Al Islam High School Bus Stop (17%).

3.2. Operational Performance

Based on the results of the performance evaluation, the values for the load factor, headway, travel time, travel speed, and stopping time are obtained. The recapitulation results can be seen in Table 4.
Based on Table 4, it can be seen that several indicators have met the standards, namely headway, travel speed, and stopping time. Indicators that do not meet the standards are the load factor and travel time. This low load factor is because many people still choose private vehicles as their main mode of travel compared to public transportation. From observations in the field, it is found that there is currently a Trans Jateng Bus which has a Solo–Sukoharjo–Wonogiri route. This bus meets with the Corridor-6 of BST at Tirtonadi Terminal and Solo Baru, so it can be an alternative mode of transportation for passengers in these two areas. This is attractive because the route is simpler than Corridor-6 which passes through the city center.

3.3. Passenger Satisfaction Level

The level of passenger satisfaction analyzed includes the physical condition of the bus and the service from the service provider. Based on the recapitulation results, the level of achievement of respondents was obtained, which can be seen in Table 5.
Based on Table 5, it can be seen that the range of the respondent achievement level (RAL) values is 72.4–80%. The lowest score is related to the alertness of officers in handling problems on the bus. The highest score was obtained for the friendliness of the officers in the service. The table also shows the average RAL value, namely 76.78%, which refers to Table 2, which is included in the good category. Even though the results are good, operators and related parties are expected to continue to maintain this corridor service and listen to public complaints.

4. Conclusions

Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that the majority of Corridor-6 users are female (61%), aged 15–25 (44%), and are students (40%). The trip characteristics obtained were that mode changes were mostly only made once (78%), with private vehicle use or traveling on foot (36%), originating from the Timuran Bus Stop (16%) and going to the Al Islam High School (17%). The performance indicators for this mode of transportation that meet the standards are headway, travel speed, and stopping time, while those that do not meet the standards are the load factor and travel time. However, the satisfaction level value is in the range of 72.4–80%, with an average of 76.78%. Based on the results of this assessment, the service performance is categorized as good. Even though it is good, there has been a lot of criticism and suggestions from the public. Therefore, operators and related parties are expected to continue to maintain their services and improve the necessary matters according to public complaints. The factors that cause the load factor to be small is the existence of an alternative mode that can be used, i.e., Trans Jateng Solo–Sukoharjo–Wonogiri, whose route is simpler than Corridor-6, which passes through the city center.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology N.H. and I.D.; validation, N.H.; G.S.M. and A.M.; formal analysis, N.H. and I.D.; investigation, I.D.; resources, N.H. and I.D.; data curation, I.D.; writing—original draft preparation, I.D.; writing—review and editing, N.H.; visualization, N.H. and I.D.; supervision, N.H.; project administration, A.M.; funding acquisition, N.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta through Research Contract of HIT-PT-FT-UMS Number: 092/A.3III/FT/III/2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, for their diverse forms of support, including facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tamin, O.Z. Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi [Transport Planning and Modeling]; Penerbit Institut Teknologi Bandung: Bandung, Indonesia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lanori, T.; Supriyanto, B.H. Problems of the Impact of Modernization of Indonesia’s Public Transportation Equipment System. Int. J. Soc. Sci. 2023, 2, 2163–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kwarcinski, T. The Influence of Transport Infrastructure Development on Transport Accessibility of Rural Areas in Poland. Eur. Res. Stud. J. 2021, XXIV, 894–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rodrique, J.-P.; Notteboom, T. The Geography of Transport Systems [Internet]; Rout: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Available online: https://transportgeography.org/contents/chapter3/transportation-and-economic-development/ (accessed on 20 January 2024).
  5. Qiao, W.; Huang, X. How Does Transportation Development Affect Environmental Performance? Evidence from Hainan Province, China. Cities 2022, 129, 103835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Steffen WSchuckmann Gnatzy, T.; Darkow, I.-L.; von der Gracht, H.A. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Transport Infrastructure until the Year 2020—A Delphi based Schenario Study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2012, 79, 1373–1387. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aurarisa, I.; Yulianto, B.; Mahmudah, A.M.H. Analisis Tarif dan Load Factor Bus Batik Solo Trans Koridor 4 Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19 [Analysis of Fare and Load Factor for Batik Solo Trans Corridor-4 during The COVID-19 Pandemic]. J. Matriks Tek. Sipil 2022, 10, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. GRI. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, Nomor 22, Tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan [Republic of Indonesia Act, Number 22, Concerning Road Traffic and Transportation]; Government of Republic of Indonesia: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. MoT. Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 15 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Angkutan Orang Dengan Kendaraan Bermotor Umum Dalam Trayek [Minister of Transportation Regulation Number PM 15 of 2019 Concerning Organizing Passenger Transport with Public Motor]; MoT: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Prakoso, F.A. Evaluasi Kinerja Pelayanan Angkutan Umum Di Kabupaten Tegal: Studi Kasus Angkutan Pedesaan Trayek Slawi—Larangan [Evaluation of the Performance of Public Transport Services in Tegal Regency: Case Study of Rural Transport Slawi- Larangan]; Universitas Pancasakti Tegal: Tegal, Indonesia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. BPS Surakarta. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kota Surakarta Tahun 2022 [Economic Growth of the City of Surakarta in 2022]; Berita Resmi Statistik; BPS Surakarta: Surakarta, Indonesia, 2023; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  12. BPS Surakarta. Jumlah Penduduk Menurut Kecamatan (Jiwa), 2020–2022 [Internet]. Badan Pusat Statistik, Kota Surakarta. 2022. Available online: https://surakartakota.bps.go.id/indicator/12/313/1/jumlah-penduduk-menurut-kecamatan-kota-surakarta (accessed on 17 January 2024).
  13. BPS. Luas Wilayah Menurut Kabupaten/Kota 2019–2021 [Internet]. BPS Jateng. 2021. Available online: https://jateng.bps.go.id/indicator/153/613/1/luas-wilayah-menurut-kabupaten-kota.html (accessed on 20 January 2024).
  14. Rahmawati, F. Analisis Tarif Berdasarkan Biaya Operasional Kendaraan (BOK), Ability To Pay (ATP), dan Willingness To Pay (WTP) Bus Batik Solo Trans Ppda Masa Pandemi COVID-19: Studi Kasus Koridor 1 & 2 [Fare Analysis Based on Vehicle Operating Cost (VOC), Ability to Pa]; Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta: Surakarta, Indonesia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  15. Levinson, D. Perspectives on Efficiency in Transportation. Int. J. Transp. Manag. 2003, 1, 145–155. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471405104000035 (accessed on 20 January 2024). [CrossRef]
  16. Istianto, B.; Djajasinga, N. Analysis of the Performance of Public Transportation Services in the Traffic Perspective of the City of Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. 2021, 11, 3090–3102. [Google Scholar]
  17. MoT. Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 98 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Pelayanan Minimal Angkutan Orang Dengan Kendaraan Bermotor Umum Dalam Trayek [Minister of Transportation Regulation Number 98 of 2013 Concerning Minimum Service Standard for Passenger Trans]; MoT: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Avisha, F. Evaluasi Tarif Angkutan Umum Berdasarkan Biaya Operasional Kendaraan (BOK), Ability to Pay (ATP) dan Willingness to Pay (WTP) Angkutan Bus Antar Kota CV Sempati Star; Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara: Medan, Indonesia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. MoT. Program TEMAN BUS Telah Melayani 1,5 Juta Lebih Perjalanan [TEMAN BUS Application has Served More Than 1.5 Millios Trips] [Internet]. Ministry of Transportation. 2020. Available online: https://portal.dephub.go.id/post/read/program-teman-bus-telah-layani-1,5-juta-lebih-perjalanan (accessed on 18 January 2024).
  20. Ginting, V.D.; Putra, I.K.K.; Maharani, N.P.A.; Kusuma, R.A.F.; Dwipayana, A.D. Integrasi Pelayanan Teman Bus Terhadap Kawasan Strategis Pariwisata Nasional di Bali. J. Rekayasa Sipil Dan Lingkung. 2022, 4, 176–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Google. Terminal Tirtonadi—The Park Mall Solo Baru [Internet]. Google Maps. Available online: https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Terminal+Tirtonadi,+Jalan+Ahmad+Yani,+Manahan,+Kota+Surakarta,+Jawa+Tengah/The+Park+Mall+Solo+Baru,+Jl.+Ir.+Soekarno,+Dusun+II,+Madegondo,+Kec.+Grogol,+Kabupaten+Sukoharjo,+Jawa+Tengah+57552/@-7.5705323,110.8241204,13z/data=!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x2e7a1699c370c19d:0xcc43da4b051938d0!2m2!1d110.8186087!2d-7.5515164!1m5!1m1!1s0x2e7a170b4060aab1:0x5b04edc33af1a382!2m2!1d110.8166993!2d-7.5988324!3e3?entry=ttu (accessed on 20 January 2024).
  22. DGoLT. Pedoman Teknis Penyelenggaraan Angkutan Penumpang Umum di Wilayah Perkotaan dalam Trayek Tetap dan Teratur [Technical Guidelines for Organizing Public Passenger Transport in Urban Areas on Fixed and Regular Routes]; SK.687/AJ.206/DRJD/2002; Directorat General of Land Transportation: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  23. MoT. Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2012 tentang Standar Pelayanan Minimal Angkutan Massal Berbasis Jalan [Indonesian Minister of Transportation Regulation Number 10 of 2012 concerning Minimum Service Standards for Road-Based M]; MoT: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gwilliam, K.M. Cities on the Move: A World Bank Urban Transport Strategy Review [Internet]; World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2002; Available online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/928301468762905413/Cities-on-the-Move-A-World-Bank-Urban-Transport-Strategy-Review (accessed on 20 January 2024).
  25. Hasanah, R.; Kusumawati, W.D. Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal Development of Ethnoscience-Based Digital Teaching Materials in Authentic Jember Patrol Music in Sound Sub Materials for Students in Junior High School. Integr. Sci. Educ. Teach. Act. 2022, 3, 56–69. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Corridor-6 of Batik Solo Trans [21].
Figure 1. Corridor-6 of Batik Solo Trans [21].
Engproc 63 00009 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of passenger origin zones.
Figure 2. Distribution of passenger origin zones.
Engproc 63 00009 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of passenger destination zones.
Figure 3. Distribution of passenger destination zones.
Engproc 63 00009 g003
Table 1. Instrument validity and reliability test results.
Table 1. Instrument validity and reliability test results.
Question NumberrcalculatertableMark
10.7010.355Valid
20.8450.355Valid
30.5430.355Valid
40.6700.355Valid
50.5270.355Valid
60.7250.355Valid
70.5940.355Valid
80.5840.355Valid
90.7240.355Valid
100.4830.355Valid
Table 2. Respondent achievement level (RAL).
Table 2. Respondent achievement level (RAL).
InformationRAL (%)
Extremely poor0–20
Poor21–40
Moderate41–60
Good61–80
Extremely good81–100
Table 3. Characteristics of passengers.
Table 3. Characteristics of passengers.
CharacteristicRespondents
Number (%)
Gender
Male3939
Female6161
Age
15–254444
26–362323
37–471616
48–581212
59–7055
Occupation
Student4040
Merchant1919
Private employee2323
Government employee66
Others1212
Frequent
17878
22020
322
Previous mode used
Walking3636
Private mode3636
Others2828
Table 4. Corridor-6 of BST performance evaluation.
Table 4. Corridor-6 of BST performance evaluation.
IndicatorAverageStandard Marks of the Standard
SK. 687 (2002)PM 10 (2012)World Bank
Load factor (%)19 >70Did not meet
Headway (minutes)5.78Ideal 5–10
Peak 2–5
Average 5–10 Maximum 10–20 Meet
Travel time (hours)36.85Average 1.0–1.5, Maximum 2–3 Average 1.0–1.5 Maximum 2–3 Did not meet
Travel speed (km/hour)25.47Maximum 30Peak 30
Off peak 60
High density 10–12, Low density 25 Meet
Stopped time (seconds)6 Peak 45
Off peak 60
Meet
Table 5. Services assessment.
Table 5. Services assessment.
NoCriteriaExtremely GoodGoodModeratePoorExtremely
Poor
RAL
(%)
1Timeliness1664146078
2Friendly officer2061181080
3Comfortable seat1262260077.2
4Bus stop information1743381174.8
5Officer alertness1343377072.4
6Quality of payment services1845361076
7Air conditioning1758250078.4
8Cleanliness and tidiness1564201078.6
9Access for boarding and aligning1660231078.2
10Interior and exterior appearance1060219074.2
Average76.78
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hidayati, N.; Damarjati, I.; Mulyono, G.S.; Magfirona, A. Performance Analysis of Batik Solo Trans Corridor-6 Services. Eng. Proc. 2024, 63, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024063009

AMA Style

Hidayati N, Damarjati I, Mulyono GS, Magfirona A. Performance Analysis of Batik Solo Trans Corridor-6 Services. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 63(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024063009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hidayati, Nurul, Ilham Damarjati, Gotot S. Mulyono, and Alfia Magfirona. 2024. "Performance Analysis of Batik Solo Trans Corridor-6 Services" Engineering Proceedings 63, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024063009

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop