Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Hydro-Lipophilic Properties of Novel Fluorinated Benzyl Carbamates of 4-Aminosalicylanilides
Previous Article in Journal
Thiomonosaccharide Derivatives from D-Mannose
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

In Silico Screening of Agonist and Antagonist Natural Compounds from Reported Essential Oils against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus †

1
NemaLab-MED, Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Évora University, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
2
Plant Metabolomics Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier (ITQB NOVA), Av. da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
3
Science and Technology School of Évora University, Rua Romão Ramalho nº59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 24th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 15 November–15 December 2020; Available online: https://ecsoc-24.sciforum.net.
Chem. Proc. 2021, 3(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-24-08386
Published: 14 November 2020

Abstract

:
Chemical control has been the most effective and reliable containment strategy in integrated pest management of pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN), Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Yet, large spectrum nematicides can be dangerous to human health and the environment. Essential oils (EOs) are safer sustainable alternatives, being composed of highly active natural compounds. A survey of bibliographic data on the detailed chemical composition and activity of the EOs used against the PWN allowed pinpointing monoterpenes as the main source of structures with agonist or antagonist properties. Transversal EO data treatment can identify potential highly active anti-PWN compounds.

Published: 14 November 2020

1. Introduction

Plant parasitic nematodes are still a major threat to the sustainability of world agriculture, forestry, and related industries. Their impact on global crop yield is an estimated $157 billion, twice as much as that of invasive insects [1]. The increased spread of these plant pathogens takes advantage of the increased use of global trade transportation brought about by a reduction in shipping costs and the increased reliance of the commerce industry. The pine wilt disease (PWD), caused by the pinewood nematode (PWN), Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer 1934) Nickle 1970, is an example of an extremely hazardous forest disease with a high spread rate. In its native range, in North America, it causes damage only to introduced exotic pines, while autochthonous pines show tolerance. Yet, after its introduction to Japan in the 1900s, vast susceptible pine stands were devastated with grave environmental and economic repercussions [2]. Unsuccessful containment strategies lead to its spread to neighboring China (1982) and Korea (1988) and, in 1999, to Europe (Portugal) [3].
PWN containment generally relies on the removal of the insect vector through aerial application of synthetic insecticides, establishment of pine tree-free buffer zones, fumigation of infected trees or on the use of vector natural enemies [4]. Additionally, the application of synthetic or hemisynthetic chemical nematicides is currently the most effective and reliable containment practice in integrated management, and is widely used in the most affected countries [5]. These contact nematicides act by killing the nematode through direct exposure, after trunk injection of lethal concentrations of the compound. Nevertheless, common use broad spectrum nematicides show several disadvantages. Besides being toxic to other beneficial microorganisms, some have been banned due to hazardous effects to humans and animals, and most can accumulate in the soil and in food plants. Moreover, due to the recent development of drug resistance to these pesticides in insect pests, the fear of lack of efficiency on the PWN has arisen [5]. Worldwide research has directed its efforts towards the screening of environmentally friendlier natural compounds with increased anti-PWN properties. Plant extracts and essential oils (EOs) have proven to be effective alternatives given that, besides being easily obtained and highly active, they do not accumulate in the environment and have a broad range of biological activities, which diminishes the risk of developing resistant pathogenic strains [6]. EOs are composed of highly active chemical classes of compounds, generally terpenoids (mono-, sesquiterpenes and a few diterpenes), phenolic compounds, such as phenylpropanoids, but other groups of volatile compounds can occur in high relative amounts [6]. The biological activities displayed by these complex mixtures often result from the combined effect of volatiles that show direct activity with those that show no direct activity on the biological system, but that are capable of influencing resorption, rate of reactions and bioavailability of the first. Interactions can be additive, synergistic or antagonistic, if the combined effect is equal, exceeds or is less than to the sum of the individual effects, respectively [7]. Most studies neglect to disclose the full EO chemical composition even though this is a valuable information towards understanding anti-PWN activities. In the present work, the available bibliography on detailed chemical composition and biological activity of the EOs used against the PWN was thoroughly screened. The correlation between each EO component abundance and the anti-PWN activity of the respective EO was used to pinpoint compounds with a high probability of showing agonist or antagonist responses to anti-PWN activity. Lastly, volatiles with these potential interactions were investigated in data from reported EOs of pine species with recognized variation in susceptibility to the PWD. The information gathered in the present work may provide the groundwork to understand the complex biochemical mechanisms responsible for volatiles’ nematotoxic activity and role in host tolerance to the PWD.

2. Reports with Detailed Essential Oil Composition

Research was performed with Web of Science® search engine on published works reporting direct contact bioassays, in all available databases, using the topics “Bursaphelenchus xylophilus” and “Essential oil”. Information on EO qualitative and quantitative chemical composition and PWN mortality, at the various applied EO concentrations, was collected when available. Information was compiled in a single table and dose-response curves were fitted to each EO chemical component, transversally to all EOs, using Origin 2019 statistical software [8]. Information on positive or negative correlation and goodness of fit (coefficient of determination [R2] values) was obtained.
Full or partial identification of anti-PWN EO composition was retrieved from ten reports, dating from 2005 to 2013 (Figure 1a) [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. These were published in journals covering mainly areas of zoology (70%), biochemistry and molecular biology (20%) and chemistry (20%).
The listed publications were cited 513 times (483, excluding self-citations) by a total of 378 reports (370, excluding self-citations), with an average of 51 citations per work. Citing articles were published by journals publishing on plant sciences, chemistry, agriculture, environmental sciences and ecology research areas. Research interest increased from 2005 to 2012 but has since become stable (Figure 1b).

3. Potentially Agonist and Antagonist Essential Oil Components

The identification of reported EOs composition was performed using gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in every publication. A total of 109 EOs were used, summing a collective 325 volatiles, from eight chemical classes; namely, alcohols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, esters, ethers, hydrocarbons, ketones and sulphides. From these, negative and positive correlations with anti-PWN activity were identified for 36 compounds, mainly monoterpenoids. Selected compounds displayed datasets with more than three different entries obtained from three different EOs and a goodness of fit value above 0.2. Ten compounds showed negative correlations and 26 showed positive correlations. The top five compounds with negative correlations (potential antagonists) were 1,8-cineole, β-thujone, β-copaene, cis-jasmone and iso-menthone, with R2 values between 0.43 and 0.99, and datasets that ranged from 3 to 55 entries (Figure 2a). The top five compounds with positive correlations (potential agonists) were citronellol, 1-octanol, δ-elemene, geranyl acetone and 2-pentyl furan, with R2 values that ranged from 0.79 to 0.86, and datasets between 4 and 25 entries (Figure 2b).

Occurrence of Selected Compounds on Pinus Hosts with Different PWD Susceptibilities

A previous study reported on the volatile composition of Pinus species with different degrees of susceptibility to the PWD. In this study, the EOs of the less susceptible P. pinea and P. halepensis and the more susceptible P. pinaster, and P. sylvestris where characterized with GC-MS [18]. The compounds with positive and negative correlations identified in the present study were crossed with the data reported in this work, and several important trends were identified. Shoots of healthy stone pine trees, P. pinea, the least susceptible of the four species, revealed EOs with twice as much components with positive anti-PWN correlations as maritime pine, P. pinaster, the most affected species in the Mediterranean. In fact, the cumulative relative amount of EO components with negative anti-PWN correlations in P. pinaster EO was almost four-fold higher than that in P. pinea EO. This is an indication that complex biochemical mechanisms may be implicated in the interspecies variation of host susceptibility to the PWD.

4. Conclusions

EOs can provide powerful alternatives to synthetic nematicides in sustainable PWD containment strategies. They are composed of volatile compounds that can either have a positive, negative or no effect on anti-PWN activity. Furthermore, the total EO activity is a result of compounds’ additive, synergistic and competitive interactions. Crossing available data on the composition of anti-PWN EOs reported worldwide allowed the most probable agonist and antagonist EO components to be indicated. Screening these on published pine host EOs revealed that less susceptible P. pinea showed a greater number of agonist compounds towards anti-PWN activity while the more susceptible P. pinaster showed a higher proportion of antagonists in its EO composition.
Further research is needed to screen the interactions between the components of an active EO to reach definitive EO mechanisms of action on the PWN. Additionally, the connection between biochemical mechanisms of variation in host susceptibility to the PWD and its EO composition should be addressed if a multilayered strategy for PWD sustainable integrated management is to be reached.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.S.F.; methodology, J.M.S.F.; A.M.R. investigation, J.M.S.F.; resources, J.M.S.F.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M.S.F.; writing—review and editing, P.B., A.M.R. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Poveda, J.; Abril-Urias, P.; Escobar, C. Biological Control of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes by Filamentous Fungi Inducers of Resistance: Trichoderma, Mycorrhizal and Endophytic Fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Futai, K. Pine Wilt in Japan: From first incidence to the present. In Pine Wilt Disease; Zhao, B.G., Futai, K., Sutherland, J.R., Takeuchi, Y., Eds.; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2008; pp. 5–12. ISBN 978-4-431-75655-2. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mota, M.; Braasch, H.; Bravo, M.A.; Penas, A.C.; Burgermeister, W.; Metge, K.; Sousa, E. First report of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Portugal and in Europe. Nematology 1999, 1, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vicente, C.; Espada, M.; Vieira, P.; Mota, M. Pine Wilt Disease: A threat to European forestry. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 133, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bi, Z.; Gong, Y.; Huang, X.; Yu, H.; Bai, L.; Hu, J. Efficacy of four nematicides against the reproduction and development of pinewood Nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. J. Nematol. 2015, 47, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Scheffer, J.J.C. Factors affecting secondary metabolite production in plants: Volatile components and essential oils. Flavour Fragr. J. 2008, 23, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Faria, J.M.S.; Sena, I.; Ribeiro, B.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Maleita, C.M.N.; Abrantes, I.; Bennett, R.; Mota, M.; da Silva Figueiredo, A.C. First report on Meloidogyne chitwoodi hatching inhibition activity of essential oils and essential oils fractions. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Faria, J.M.S.; Barbosa, P.; Bennett, R.N.; Mota, M.; Figueiredo, A.C. Bioactivity against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus: Nematotoxics from essential oils, essential oils fractions and decoction waters. Phytochemistry 2013, 94, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Park, I.-K.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.-G.; Shin, S.-C. Nematicidal activity of plant essential oils and components from Ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi), Allspice (Pimenta dioica) and Litsea (Litsea cubeba) essential oils against pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). J. Nematol. 2007, 39, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Park, I.K.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, K.H.; Choi, K.S.; Choi, I.H.; Kim, C.S.; Shin, S.C. Nematicidal activity of plant essential oils and components from garlic (Allium sativum) and cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) oils against the pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Nematology 2005, 7, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. JunHeon, K.; SunMi, S.; SangGil, L.; SangChul, S.; IlKwon, P. Nematicidal activity of plant essential oils and components from coriander (Coriandrum sativum), Oriental sweetgum (Liquidambar orientalis), and valerian (Valeriana wallichii) essential oils against pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 7316–7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barbosa, P.; Faria, J.M.S.; Mendes, M.D.; Dias, L.S.; Tinoco, M.T.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Mota, M. Bioassays against pinewood nematode: Assessment of a suitable dilution agent and screening for bioactive essential oils. Molecules 2012, 17, 2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Barbosa, P.; Lima, A.S.; Vieira, P.; Dias, L.S.; Tinoco, M.T.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Mota, M. Nematicidal activity of essential oils and volatiles derived from Portuguese aromatic flora against the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. J. Nematol. 2010, 42, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kong, J.O.; Lee, S.M.; Moon, Y.S.; Lee, S.G.; Ahn, Y.J. Nematicidal activity of cassia and cinnamon oil compounds and related compounds toward Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae). J. Nematol. 2007, 39, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Kong, J.O.; Park, I.K.; Choi, K.S.; Shin, S.C.; Ahn, Y. Joon Nematicidal and propagation activities of thyme red and white oil compounds toward Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae). J. Nematol. 2007, 39, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Choi, I.-H.; Shin, S.-C.; Park, I.-K. Nematicidal activity of onion (Allium cepa) oil and its components against the pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Nematology 2007, 9, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, J.; Seo, S.M.; Park, I.K. Nematicidal activity of plant essential oils and components from Gaultheria fragrantissima and Zanthoxylum alatum against the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Nematology 2011, 13, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rodrigues, A.M.; Mendes, M.D.; Lima, A.S.; Barbosa, P.M.; Ascensão, L.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Mota, M.M.; Figueiredo, A.C. Pinus halepensis, Pinus pinaster, Pinus pinea and Pinus sylvestris essential oils chemotypes and monoterpene hydrocarbon enantiomers, before and after inoculation with the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1600153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Yearly number of reports on the activity of essential oils, with detailed chemical composition, against Bursphalenchus xylophilus and (b) yearly citation evolution of these reports.
Figure 1. (a) Yearly number of reports on the activity of essential oils, with detailed chemical composition, against Bursphalenchus xylophilus and (b) yearly citation evolution of these reports.
Chemproc 03 00031 g001
Figure 2. Identification of the top 5 essential oil (EO) components showing negative (a) and positive (b) correlations with anti-pinewood nematode EO activity, that show the highest goodness of fit values after dose-response curve fitting.
Figure 2. Identification of the top 5 essential oil (EO) components showing negative (a) and positive (b) correlations with anti-pinewood nematode EO activity, that show the highest goodness of fit values after dose-response curve fitting.
Chemproc 03 00031 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Faria, J.M.S.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Barbosa, P.; Mota, M. In Silico Screening of Agonist and Antagonist Natural Compounds from Reported Essential Oils against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Chem. Proc. 2021, 3, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-24-08386

AMA Style

Faria JMS, Rodrigues AM, Barbosa P, Mota M. In Silico Screening of Agonist and Antagonist Natural Compounds from Reported Essential Oils against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Chemistry Proceedings. 2021; 3(1):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-24-08386

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faria, Jorge M. S., Ana Margarida Rodrigues, Pedro Barbosa, and Manuel Mota. 2021. "In Silico Screening of Agonist and Antagonist Natural Compounds from Reported Essential Oils against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus" Chemistry Proceedings 3, no. 1: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-24-08386

APA Style

Faria, J. M. S., Rodrigues, A. M., Barbosa, P., & Mota, M. (2021). In Silico Screening of Agonist and Antagonist Natural Compounds from Reported Essential Oils against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Chemistry Proceedings, 3(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-24-08386

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop