Previous Issue
Volume 8, June
 
 

Plasma, Volume 8, Issue 3 (September 2025) – 3 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 2726 KiB  
Article
Streamer Discharge Modeling for Plasma-Assisted Combustion
by Stuart Reyes and Shirshak Kumar Dhali
Plasma 2025, 8(3), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/plasma8030028 - 10 Jul 2025
Abstract
Some of the popular and successful atmospheric pressure fuel/air plasma-assisted combustion methods use repetitive ns pulsed discharges and dielectric-barrier discharges. The transient phase in such discharges is dominated by transport under strong space charge from ionization fronts, which is best characterized by the [...] Read more.
Some of the popular and successful atmospheric pressure fuel/air plasma-assisted combustion methods use repetitive ns pulsed discharges and dielectric-barrier discharges. The transient phase in such discharges is dominated by transport under strong space charge from ionization fronts, which is best characterized by the streamer model. The role of the nonthermal plasma in such discharges is to produce radicals, which accelerates the chemical conversion reaction leading to temperature rise and ignition. Therefore, the characterization of the streamer and its energy partitioning is essential to develop a predictive model. We examine the important characteristics of streamers that influence combustion and develop some macroscopic parameters. Our results show that the radicals’ production efficiency at an applied field is nearly independent of time and the radical density generated depends only on the electrical energy density coupled to the plasma. We compare the results of the streamer model to the zero-dimensional uniform field Townsend-like discharge, and our results show a significant difference. The results concerning the influence of energy density and repetition rate on the ignition of a hydrogen/air fuel mixture are presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Plasma Theory, Modeling and Predictive Simulations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 8047 KiB  
Article
Hybrid Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor: Production of Reactive Oxygen–Nitrogen Species in Humid Air
by Dariusz Korzec, Florian Freund, Christian Bäuml, Patrik Penzkofer, Oliver Beier, Andreas Pfuch, Klaus Vogelsang, Frank Froehlich and Stefan Nettesheim
Plasma 2025, 8(3), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/plasma8030027 - 6 Jul 2025
Viewed by 336
Abstract
Reactive oxygen–nitrogen species (RONS) production in a Peltier-cooled hybrid dielectric barrier discharge (HDBD) reactor operated with humid air is characterized. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) is used to determine the RONS in the HDBD-produced gases. The presence of molecules O3, NO2 [...] Read more.
Reactive oxygen–nitrogen species (RONS) production in a Peltier-cooled hybrid dielectric barrier discharge (HDBD) reactor operated with humid air is characterized. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) is used to determine the RONS in the HDBD-produced gases. The presence of molecules O3, NO2, N2O, N2O5, and HNO3 is evaluated. The influence of HDBD reactor operation parameters on the FTIR result is discussed. The strongest influence of Peltier cooling on RONS chemistry is reached at conditions related to a high specific energy input (SEI): high voltage and duty cycle of plasma width modulation (PWM), and low gas flow. Both PWM and Peltier cooling can achieve a change in the chemistry from oxygen-based to nitrogen-based. N2O5 and HNO3 are detected at a low humidity of 7% in the reactor input air but not at humidity exceeding 90%. In addition to the FTIR analysis, the plasma-activated water (PAW) is investigated. PAW is produced by bubbling the HDBD plasma gas through 12.5 mL of distilled water in a closed-loop circulation at a high SEI. Despite the absence of N2O5 and HNO3 in the gas phase, the acidity of the PAW is increased. The pH value decreases on average by 0.12 per minute. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Processes in Atmospheric-Pressure Plasmas—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 995 KiB  
Article
A Quasi-Spherical Fusion Reactor Burning Boron-11 Fuel
by Joel G. Rogers, Andrew A. Egly, Yoon S. Roh, Robert E. Terry and Frank J. Wessel
Plasma 2025, 8(3), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/plasma8030026 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 212
Abstract
In this study, particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation was used to validate a conceptual design for a quasi-spherical, net power, hydrogen-plus-boron-11-fueled fusion reactor incorporating high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnets. By burning a fully thermalized plasma, our proposed MET6 reactor uses the principles of the 1980 magneto-electrostatic [...] Read more.
In this study, particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation was used to validate a conceptual design for a quasi-spherical, net power, hydrogen-plus-boron-11-fueled fusion reactor incorporating high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnets. By burning a fully thermalized plasma, our proposed MET6 reactor uses the principles of the 1980 magneto-electrostatic trap design of Yushmanov to improve the classic Polywell design. Because the input power consumed by the reactor will barely balance the waste bremsstrahlung radiation, future research must focus on reducing the bremsstrahlung losses to reach practical net power levels. The first step to reducing bremsstrahlung, explored in this paper, is to tune the reactor parameters to reduce the energies of trapped electrons. We assume the quality factor Q can be approximated as the ratio of fusion power output divided by bremsstrahlung power loss. Thus, assuming the particles’ power loss is negligible compared to bremsstrahlung power loss, the resulting quality factor is estimated to be Q ≈ 1.3. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Plasma Sciences 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop