1. Introduction
Composite metal foams (CMF) were invented in the late 1920s (e.g., Reference [
1]). Since then, they have been the focus of many studies and developments, although it is only recently that they have found relevant industrial application. In fact, metallic foams show an interesting combination of physical and mechanical properties that make them extremely versatile and suitable for applications in areas where high stiffness/specific weight ratio is required [
2]. Moreover, the presence of porosities/cavities and the essential inhomogeneity make it possible for them to efficiently absorb impact loads [
3], besides revealing excellent acoustic/thermal insulation properties [
4] and vibration damping [
5]. These properties are attractive in many applications, especially railway, aeronautic, aerospace, and automotive industries, due to their direct influence on energy consumption [
6]. Examples of current applications include ultralight panels, energy absorbing structures, heat dissipation media, electrodes for electric batteries, ultrasound deflectors, medical prosthesis, and heat exchangers.
Given that innovation in the design and characterization of these composite materials is still possible, there are no boundaries for their industrial application [
7]. However, due to the importance of cell morphology and density (even through the same specimen), modeling approaches may not be able to fully explain the variations in terms of mechanical properties. It is possible that cell volume distribution, changes in rib thickness, and internal void superficial areas need to be considered in terms of structural analysis to understand the deformation behavior in these syntactic foams.
Traditionally, metallic foams are produced using mainly aluminum and magnesium-based alloys. Despite the variety of production methods, there are only two different routes to generate porosity/cavities [
8]: self-formation or predesign. In the first case, the porosity forms in a self-evolution process according to physical principles, and the cell structure is difficult to predict and control as they are obtained by injecting gas into a melt. In the case of predesign, the resulting structure is determined by a cell-forming mold, and the foam is obtained by powder metallurgy, sputtering, or investment casting. Each production method covers a characteristic range of density, cell size, and cell topology. In casting, the use of soluble space holders like salt [
9] or carbamide [
10], which are later removed by immersion in water [
11], is necessary. However, there is a recent trend to use low-density, hollow spheres as permanent space holders. These allow very easy control/manipulation of density and pore size/shape, which have a crucial role in the overall mechanical properties [
12]. Commonly, steel hollow spheres are employed to accomplish this task due to their inherent structural strength, capability of being densely packed, and regular shape [
13]. An alternative route to the use of steel hollow spheres is using lightweight expanded clay (LECA) as permanent space holders [
6]. Due to its high porosity, LECA particles possess low density and can be obtained at low cost. Additionally, they are characterized by good thermal and acoustic insulation [
14], are chemically inert, and have been proven to be an excellent filler in concrete composites [
15]. However, detailed information concerning their mechanical characterization and possible applications is still limited.
In this work, LECA was used as a permanent space holder to produce cast aluminum alloy composite foams. Cylindrical-shaped foam samples were produced using different LECA particle dimensions/densities and submitted to compressive testing to determine the influence of these factors in the overall static mechanical behavior of the foam.
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 3b shows the machining of the samples to a final cylindrical shape. The aluminum alloy fraction revealed a smooth surface finishing, while the LECA fraction displayed rough cavities due to their fragile collapse during both casting and the machining process. Although a steel mesh was placed during the filling process to coerce the particles (see
Figure 2), their low density (0.27–0.55 g/cm
3)—when compared with liquid aluminum alloy (2.40 g/cm
3)—and the overall turbulence during casting generated a mixed open/closed cellular structure. In
Figure 3b,c it can be observed that particles and surface tension promoted an open cell structure, while the ones apart made a closed cell. In fact, before pouring, the LECA particles were in contact, thus promoting an open cell structure. However, due to turbulence and density mismatch, some of them could move and individualize. If the compaction loads were not able to compensate these effects, there was a tendency to form closed cell cellular structures.
The final specimen dimensions, weight, and calculated densities are presented in
Figure 4 and
Figure 5. It can be observed that sample density depended on the diameter of the LECA particles, with the lower diameters leading to higher samples density.
An initial theoretical stacking proposal of the LECA particles is suggested in
Figure 6a, where the fundamental area between particles may be described by an isosceles triangle. However, this principle was changed to a real stacking of LECA particles after the aluminum infiltration by cutting the produced samples and calculating the areas of the scalene triangles formed by adjacent particles. From this analysis, the relationship between triangle areas and average side lengths was evaluated, as shown in
Figure 6b. Given the higher ratios between areas and lengths in smaller particles, there was a slightly higher concentration of aluminum alloy in the particle–particle boundaries, increasing the wall thickness, which increased the density of the samples. Additionally, the higher standard deviation in samples with higher diameters was correlated with the higher sample diameter mismatch, as shown in
Figure 1.
Figure 7 shows the average stress–strain behavior under uniaxial compression of samples with different LECA particle diameters. It suggests that the particle diameter and, by consequence, the density of the samples, had a primary role in the mechanical performance of this cellular material. Nevertheless, every tested configuration was able to replicate a typical three-stage curve of a foam structure under compression, with pronounced linear elastic, plateau, and densification regions.
On an initial stage, the sample was constrained by a preload (
Figure 8a), which was negligible and corresponded to point (a) in
Figure 7. As the loads imposed on the samples increased, there was a proportional linear increase in stress values until yielding occurred (point (b) in
Figure 7), as shown in
Figure 8b. A further increase in the loading led to the internal cellular structure starting to progressively collapse in a plateau region. As the strain increased, the internal aluminum walls collapsed due to the combined complex loading states (point (c) of
Figure 7 and
Figure 8) and, although the values of strain were increased, the stress was fairly linear. During this period, the internal structure of the LECA particles was crushed by severe aluminum plastic wall deformation. By this phase, the metallic foam completely compromised their initial spherical cell stable configuration. The increase in the referred compression strain implied that the original cellular LECA internal structure was lost and that the remaining clay densified as the aluminum cells tended to close (
Figure 7 and
Figure 8d).
From
Figure 7 and
Figure 8, it is possible to understand the static mechanical behavior of this kind of metallic foam.
Figure 9 suggests that an increase in particle diameter generated an elevation in yield strength, although the samples’ absolute and relative densities decreased (see
Figure 5 and
Figure 6).
In order to justify this increase in yield strength when the overall density was increased, three fundamental two-dimensional unitary cells representing the aluminum/LECA foam were modeled (
Figure 10a). These fundamental models were composed of LECA particles with 3.5 mm diameter. The regular rib model represented the fundamental situation in which stacking promotes a regular area where particles are regularly spaced and may be correlated with the lower particle diameters, as shown in
Figure 1. Both “thin” and “thick” rib models represented variations in the periodicity of the fundamental two-dimensional cells, being associated with the standard deviations in higher particle diameters shown in
Figure 1. These referred models were subjected to a uniaxial compression simulation using finite element analysis (FEA) (
Figure 10b); the details of which are presented in
Table 4. Fundamentally, these simulations allowed the determination of reaction loads and deformations in the models that were used to calculate the apparent stresses and strains in the referred models.
From these simulations, it was possible to determine the apparent stress–strain curves of the referred models (
Figure 11a). Based on these curves, the apparent yield strength (
Figure 11b) of the models could be determined by observing the deviation from the numerical results from the initial elastic proportional plot.
Based on the results shown in
Figure 11b, it was possible to determine that the deviations from the theoretical isosceles triangles between particles might generate a variation in the values of yield strength. However, as shown, this deviation of the isosceles model, which is typical of the higher LECA diameters due to particle diameter mismatch (
Figure 1 and
Figure 4), might increase the average values of yield strength.
The suggested hypothesis was supported by the analysis of the plateau region. Given the higher average yield strength ability of these thick/thin ribs, the structure with higher particle diameter provided a near constant stress plateau (
Figure 9), according to Equations (1)–(3), due to a well distributed thru-height deformation.
In samples with smaller particles diameter, a more localized deformation was promoted due to the lower yield strength, and the different cellular layers progressively collapsed, generating a gradual increase in sample stiffness that was proved by the high slope in the plateau equation of these samples. This steady densification generated a smooth collapse, as shown by the data concerning the standard deviation of Equations (1)–(3) relatively to the established experimental plateaus of
Figure 7.
In terms of densification, smaller particles promoted an increase in density and, as a consequence, the overall densification strain was reduced. Given that the cellular structure was only able to collapse until all LECA-filled cells were crushed, the relative amount of these structures decreased, as did the allowable admitted deformation for this process to occur.
Finally, it was apparent that an increase in particle size was advantageous to elevate the crushing energy until the densification strain. The elevation of yield strength and a more linear plateau promoted a more efficient route to absorb crushing energy.