Next Article in Journal
Non-Debye vs. Debye Dielectric Relaxation: How Does Memory Effect Arise?
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Channeling Technologies: Strong External Electromagnetic Fields to Guide Charged & Neutral Beams
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Measuring Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction: A Review †

by
Christian Back
1,2,
Giovanni Carlotti
3,
Arianna Casiraghi
4,
Gianfranco Durin
4,
Felipe Garcia-Sanchez
5,
Michaela Kuepferling
4,*,
Christopher Marrows
6,
Gabriel Soares
4 and
Silvia Tacchi
7
1
Technical University Munich, Physik Department EFS, James-Frank-Str. 1, 85748 Garching, Germany
2
Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Schellingstr. 4, 80799 München, Germany
3
Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia, Univ. of Perugia, Via A. Pascoli, I-06123 Perugia, Italy
4
Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135, Turin, Italy
5
Dep. of Appl. Physics, Univ. of Salamanca, Plaza de los Caidos, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
6
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
7
CNR, Istituto Officina dei Materiali-Perugia, c/o Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia-Univ. Perugia, Via A. Pascoli, 06123 Perugia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 37th International Symposium on Dynamical Properties of Solids (DyProSo 2019), Ferrara, Italy, 8–12 September 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 26(1), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019026041
Published: 5 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 37th International Symposium on Dynamical Properties of Solids)
Topology is known to stabilize rather exotic states in condensed matter and in magnetic materials. A recent example is the formation of particle-like excitations of continuous fields, as predicted by Skyrme. These so called skyrmions occur in presence of inversion symmetry breaking and indirect exchange, both favouring chiral magnetic structures via the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction (DMI) [1,2]. Recently, the DMI received broad attention from the magnetism community as it was found to occur in systems appealing for spintronic applications composed of a heavy metal (HM) layer and an ultrathin ferromagnetic (FM) film with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). Here the inversion symmetry breaking is induced by the interface and the exchange interaction is mediated by the spin-orbit coupling in the HM layer. Chiral domain walls and skyrmions are emerging as promising information carriers for future spintronic technologies, as they can be driven by electric currents with an unprecedented level of efficiency [3]. A measure for the stability of chiral magnetic structures and the strength of the DMI is the related energy coefficient D [2]. Although DMI-based phenomena have created an extremely active research field, an established and reliable method to measure D is still lacking. As a matter of fact, a lot of disagreement is currently present in the literature, especially regarding measurements of small DMI (D < 0.5 mJ/m2). Not only different measuring techniques are found to provide contradictory values for D, but controversies are also present when utilizing the same method on nominally identical stacks. We present here a review of interfacial DMI measurements, considering not only the different measurement techniques as domain wall based [4,5] and spin wave based [6] measurements, but also different compositions of the stacks investigated (e.g., FM: Co, CoFeB; HM: Pt, Ta, Ir, W). We try to clarify the differences of the various techniques describing their advantages and limitations and define a set of rules to be able to compare the data, quantitatively define the role of HM layer, considering its thickness, the production methodology, the annealing, etc. We also aim to introduce a standard coordinate system for the experimental quantities in order to define uniquely the sign of D.

Funding

This work was supported by the EMPIR project 17FUN08 TOPS. This project has received funding from the EMPIR programme co-financed by the Participating States and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.

References

  1. Dzyaloshinskii, I.E. Thermodynamic Theory of “Weak” Ferromagnetism in Antiferromagnetic Substances. Sov. Phys. JETP 1957, 5, 1259. [Google Scholar]
  2. Moriya, T. Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. 1960, 120, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Parkin, S.; Yang, S.H. Memory on the racetrack. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Emori, S.; Bauer, U.; Ahn, S.M.; Martinez, E.; Beach, G.S. Current-driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Je, S.G.; Kim, D.H.; Yoo, S.C.; Min, B.C.; Lee, K.J.; Choe, S.B. Asymmetric magnetic domain-wall motion by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 214401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moon, J.-H.; Seo, S.-M.; Lee, K.-J.; Kim, K.-W.; Ryu, J.; Lee, H.-W.; McMichael, R.D.; Stiles, M.D. Spin-wave propagation in the presence of interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 184404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Back, C.; Carlotti, G.; Casiraghi, A.; Durin, G.; Garcia-Sanchez, F.; Kuepferling, M.; Marrows, C.; Soares, G.; Tacchi, S. Measuring Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction: A Review. Proceedings 2019, 26, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019026041

AMA Style

Back C, Carlotti G, Casiraghi A, Durin G, Garcia-Sanchez F, Kuepferling M, Marrows C, Soares G, Tacchi S. Measuring Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction: A Review. Proceedings. 2019; 26(1):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019026041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Back, Christian, Giovanni Carlotti, Arianna Casiraghi, Gianfranco Durin, Felipe Garcia-Sanchez, Michaela Kuepferling, Christopher Marrows, Gabriel Soares, and Silvia Tacchi. 2019. "Measuring Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction: A Review" Proceedings 26, no. 1: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019026041

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop