Next Article in Journal
Channeling Experiments at the Mainz Microtron MAMI
Previous Article in Journal
Measuring Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Non-Debye vs. Debye Dielectric Relaxation: How Does Memory Effect Arise? †

Institute of Nuclear Physics IFJ-PAN, ul. Radzikowskiego 152, 31-342 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 37th International Symposium on Dynamical Properties of Solids (DyProSo 2019), Ferrara, Italy, 8–12 September 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 26(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019026043
Published: 5 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 37th International Symposium on Dynamical Properties of Solids)
The Debye model presents an essential and elegant description for the relaxation phenomena based on statistical mechanics. However, this model describes systems characterized by a single relaxation time as perfect liquids and crystals, quite far for the complexity which affects almost all amorphous and glassy materials.
The Debye model has been used as a starting point for other dielectric relaxation theories, named non-Debye (or anomalous) relaxation models, as for example the Havriliak-Negami relaxation model.
All these models show a power law decay behaviour for the response function as experimentally proved. A useful and powerful mathematical tool for investigating this behaviour is the fractional calculus.
The present study deals with a novel approach involving a fractional generalization for the time and frequency variables.
This approach allows us to generalize the Debye’s idea to more complex systems addressing the problem from another point of view complementary to the well-known one ruled by fractional calculus.
In particular this method examines the time-domain response function defined in terms of a Gamma distribution. The complete monotonicity of the pulse response function follows directly from our investigations.
Moreover, this method encourages the emergence of the fading memory effects as an intrinsic feature of these complex systems due to the presence of the Gamma distribution.

Funding

All the authors were supported by the NCN research project OPUS 12 no. UMO-2016/23/B/ST3/01714 and A.L. acknowledges the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange NAWA project: Program im. Iwanowskiej PPN/IWA/2018/1/00098.
 

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lattanzi, A.; Górska, K.; Horzela, A. Non-Debye vs. Debye Dielectric Relaxation: How Does Memory Effect Arise? Proceedings 2019, 26, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019026043

AMA Style

Lattanzi A, Górska K, Horzela A. Non-Debye vs. Debye Dielectric Relaxation: How Does Memory Effect Arise? Proceedings. 2019; 26(1):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019026043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lattanzi, A., K. Górska, and A. Horzela. 2019. "Non-Debye vs. Debye Dielectric Relaxation: How Does Memory Effect Arise?" Proceedings 26, no. 1: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019026043

APA Style

Lattanzi, A., Górska, K., & Horzela, A. (2019). Non-Debye vs. Debye Dielectric Relaxation: How Does Memory Effect Arise? Proceedings, 26(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019026043

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop