Next Article in Journal
Neuro-Didactics and Social Sciences: An Experience of the Application of DAS Sequence in the Geography Classroom
Previous Article in Journal
Combining Flipped Classroom Model and Educational Videos for Improving Teaching-Learning Process in Thermodynamics and Thermal Engineering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Innovative Strategies in the Educational Field: Analysis of the Systematic Mapping of Literature †

by
Leticia Nayeli Ramírez-Ramírez
* and
María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya
*
Escuela de Humanidades y Educación, Tecnológico de Monterrey, 64849 Monterrey, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd Innovative and Creative Education and Teaching International Conference (ICETIC2018), Badajoz, Spain, 20–22 June 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(21), 1349; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2211349
Published: 26 October 2018

Abstract

:
Educational innovation appears as a pending issue in the agendas of educational institutions at the international level. Current educational policies highlight the importance of educational innovation as a key element for improving educational quality and social development. From a sociocultural perspective, the social and situated character of innovation is highlighted as a process that takes place through multidisciplinary interaction and involves collaboration networks between different educational agents, institutions, and users. Through a systematic mapping of the literature, the research produced at international level on innovative strategies used in education was identified and characterized.

1. Introduction

Innovation is outlined as a pillar in promoting the educational transformations necessary for the improvement of educational quality and social development, such changes can occur at the macro level (e.g., policies of the education system, organization of the school institution) as well as at the micro level (dynamics of the educational community, student-teacher interaction). The key role that educational innovation plays in the development and improvement of teaching-learning processes, the innovative behavior of individuals, organizations, and economies, however, has been little explored in the educational literature [1,2,3], on the characteristics and typology of the educational innovations produced in the different social contexts, as well as the scope and impact that these innovations have for the agents of the educational process.

2. Theoretical Framework

Innovation is a polysemy concept, in this work it is glimpsed from a socio-cultural perspective [3] as a situated social process that does not occur in isolation and rather happens through multidisciplinary interaction involving collaboration networks between different educational agents, institutions and users, such as: teachers, students, parents, administrators, businessmen and managers. Thus, educational centers such as universities, colleges, and baccalaureates are central nodes in which innovation processes occur [4] and act as a flexible bridge to be linked in a triple helix; educational centers-companies-governments. The central role of universities in the innovative company and its relationship with business sectors has been widely recognized [5]. Following the current categories proposed by the OECD [6], educational innovation can be placed in four dimensions, namely: (1) new products or services, such as a new syllabus, textbooks or educational resources; (2) new processes to deliver their services such as the use of e-learning platforms; (3) new ways of organizing your activities, e.g., Ways to organize communication with students or parents and (4) new marketing techniques, for example, sales strategies or offers for graduate courses.

3. Method

A systematic mapping of the literature was carried out [7,8,9], whose main objective is the classification and management of a thematic analysis to identify trends in a research topic. In such a way, that a “map” is provided on the different categories generated and their relationship with the number of publications found through a systematic search. The present investigation was carried out through three phases (see Figure 1). In this phase, research questions, keywords, and search strategies were defined in the databases. As suggested by Petersen [7] in the systematic mapping the questions must reach two objectives; identify the quantity and type of research produced in the area (R1, R2, R3) and the lines, themes, forums in which these investigations have been published (R4, R5, R6). Subsequently, a systematic search was launched in two databases SCOPUS and Web of Science (WOS), the choice of these bases was related to the quality and prestige of the publications contained therein and the international coverage they present. In both cases, similar search criteria were maintained, with the following inclusion criteria: (a) Combination of keywords: “innovation strategy” and “education”, (b) Type of documents: Articles, (c) Years of publication: 2013–2017 range, (d) Discipline: Social sciences or education. We excluded publications that: (a) corresponded to the type of document: conferences, book reviews, book chapters, (b) range of years before 2013 and (c) that belonged to other disciplinary areas other than the social sciences or education.

4. Results

4.1. Research on Innovative Strategies in the Educational Field

In the characterization of the researches collected on the theme of Innovative Strategies, it was found that of the total sample identified (N = 43), the country with the highest frequency of publication is the United States (5), followed by Spain (4), United Kingdom (3), China (3), Australia (3), Africa (2), Denmark (2), Malaysia (2), Taiwan (2), Slovenia (2), and Turkey (2). On the other hand, the lowest publication frequency (1) is presented in South Africa, Germany, Canada, Chile, Finland, Holland, Hong Kong, Malta, Norway, Poland, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and Tunisia. In Figure 2, the map mapped in Tableau© is presented with the geographical location of the countries in which the subject is published and the frequency represented in the size of the circles that place those countries on the map. In Figure 3, the complete data of the scientific journals and the distribution of their publication frequency per year are shown.

4.2. Social Contexts of Innovative Strategies: Educational Organizations, Companies, and Hospitals

Based on the research identified, three social contexts emerged in which production can be placed on innovative strategies. These contexts are mainly educational organizations (37 of the articles were placed in this context), companies (5) and hospitals (1). The target populations of the investigations are diverse; students (14), professors (13), administrative (7), workers (3), librarians (2) and researchers (1). The relationship between social contexts and populations located in the researchers analyzed is shown in Figure 4.

4.3. Types of Studies and Innovation Carried Out in Research

In a general way, we find, in the analyzed literature, that most of the research production is concentrated in empirical studies (36), followed by systematic reviews of the literature (4) and finally theoretical articles (3). Within these types of studies, we identify the type of educational innovation addressed in the research (See Figure 5).

5. Discussion

Based on the mapping of the literature, international research on innovative strategies in the field of education was identified and characterized. It was identified that the majority of countries that conduct research on the subject are concentrated in Europe; on the other hand, in South America, Africa and Oceania are still incipient research on the subject. Regarding the temporary distribution of publication, we identified an increasing trend in the publication that focuses on the year 2016. Also, it was found that, of the 38 journals with an educational focus, only five of them present a higher frequency of publication. Through these data, the research need that presents the theme of innovative strategies in the educational field is evident.

Author Contributions

The first author have the more important contribution in the planning, analysis of results and the written of manuscript. The second author contribute for the method and conclusions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the support provided by the Tecnológico de Monterrey for accessing the databases. This research is the product of project 266632 “Binational Laboratory for the Intelligent Management of Energy Sustainability and Technological Training” funded by CONACYT SENER fund for Energy Sustainability (Agreement: S0019201401).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maritz, A.; De Waal, A.; Buse, S.; Herstatt, C.; Lassen, A.; Maclachlan, R. Innovation education programs: Toward a conceptual framework. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2014, 17, 166–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Richmond, G.; Tatto, M.T. Innovation in Educational Research. J. Teach. Educ. 2016, 67, 360–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Frane, A.; Westlund, H. Innovation in Socio-Cultural Context; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. OECD. The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  5. Etzkowitz, H. Triple helix clusters: Boundary permeability at university-industry-government interfaces as a regional innovation strategy. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2012, 30, 766–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. OECD. Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Petersen, K.; Feldt, R.; Mujtaba, S.; Mattsson, M. Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Keele, UK, 2–3 April 2007; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kitchenham, B.; Pretorius, R.; Budgen, D.; Brereton, O.P.; Turner, M.; Niaz, M.; Linkman, S. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering—A tertiary study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2010, 52, 792–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phases of systematic literature mapping (modified with information from Tranfield, Denyer & Smart, 2003).
Figure 1. Phases of systematic literature mapping (modified with information from Tranfield, Denyer & Smart, 2003).
Proceedings 02 01349 g001
Figure 2. Geographic location and frequency of publication on the research topic. Own elaboration.
Figure 2. Geographic location and frequency of publication on the research topic. Own elaboration.
Proceedings 02 01349 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of the frequency of publication in the subject by year and scientific magazine. Own elaboration.
Figure 3. Distribution of the frequency of publication in the subject by year and scientific magazine. Own elaboration.
Proceedings 02 01349 g003
Figure 4. Social contexts and populations that have been addressed in the investigations of the subject. Own elaboration.
Figure 4. Social contexts and populations that have been addressed in the investigations of the subject. Own elaboration.
Proceedings 02 01349 g004
Figure 5. Type of innovation and studies identified in the systematic mapping of literature. Own elaboration.
Figure 5. Type of innovation and studies identified in the systematic mapping of literature. Own elaboration.
Proceedings 02 01349 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramírez-Ramírez, L.N.; Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. Innovative Strategies in the Educational Field: Analysis of the Systematic Mapping of Literature. Proceedings 2018, 2, 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2211349

AMA Style

Ramírez-Ramírez LN, Ramírez-Montoya MS. Innovative Strategies in the Educational Field: Analysis of the Systematic Mapping of Literature. Proceedings. 2018; 2(21):1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2211349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ramírez-Ramírez, Leticia Nayeli, and María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya. 2018. "Innovative Strategies in the Educational Field: Analysis of the Systematic Mapping of Literature" Proceedings 2, no. 21: 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2211349

APA Style

Ramírez-Ramírez, L. N., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2018). Innovative Strategies in the Educational Field: Analysis of the Systematic Mapping of Literature. Proceedings, 2(21), 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2211349

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop