Next Article in Journal
High-Speed Scientific Computing Using Adaptive Spline Interpolation
Previous Article in Journal
Large Language Models in Mechanical Engineering: A Scoping Review of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

ECA110-Pooling: A Comparative Analysis of Pooling Strategies in Convolutional Neural Networks

Department of Mathematics-Informatics, The National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Pitești University Centre, 110040 Pitești, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2025, 9(12), 306; https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9120306
Submission received: 1 September 2025 / Revised: 20 November 2025 / Accepted: 27 November 2025 / Published: 2 December 2025

Abstract

Pooling strategies are fundamental to convolutional neural networks, shaping the trade-off between accuracy, robustness to spatial variations, and computational efficiency in modern visual recognition systems. In this paper, we present and validate ECA110-Pooling, a novel rule-based pooling operator inspired by elementary cellular automata. We conduct a systematic comparative study, benchmarking ECA110-Pooling against conventional pooling methods (MaxPooling, AveragePooling, MedianPooling, MinPooling, KernelPooling) as well as state-of-the-art (SOTA) architectures. Experiments on three benchmark datasets—ImageNet (subset), CIFAR-10, and Fashion-MNIST—across training horizons ranging from 20 to 50,000 epochs show that ECA110-Pooling consistently achieves higher Top-1 accuracy, lower error rates, and stronger F1-scores than traditional pooling operators, while maintaining computational efficiency comparable to MaxPooling. Moreover, when compared with SOTA models, ECA110-Pooling delivers competitive accuracy with substantially fewer parameters and reduced training time. These results establish ECA110-Pooling as a principled and validated approach to image classification, bridging the gap between fixed pooling schemes and complex deep architectures. Its interpretable, rule-based design highlights both theoretical significance and practical applicability in contexts that demand a balance of accuracy, efficiency, and scalability.
Keywords: neural networks; image classification; pooling strategies; MaxPooling; AveragePooling; MedianPooling; MinPooling; KernelPooling; elementary cellular automata (ECA); deep learning neural networks; image classification; pooling strategies; MaxPooling; AveragePooling; MedianPooling; MinPooling; KernelPooling; elementary cellular automata (ECA); deep learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Constantin, D.; Bălcău, C. ECA110-Pooling: A Comparative Analysis of Pooling Strategies in Convolutional Neural Networks. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2025, 9, 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9120306

AMA Style

Constantin D, Bălcău C. ECA110-Pooling: A Comparative Analysis of Pooling Strategies in Convolutional Neural Networks. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 2025; 9(12):306. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9120306

Chicago/Turabian Style

Constantin, Doru, and Costel Bălcău. 2025. "ECA110-Pooling: A Comparative Analysis of Pooling Strategies in Convolutional Neural Networks" Big Data and Cognitive Computing 9, no. 12: 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9120306

APA Style

Constantin, D., & Bălcău, C. (2025). ECA110-Pooling: A Comparative Analysis of Pooling Strategies in Convolutional Neural Networks. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 9(12), 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9120306

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop