You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Infrastructures
Download PDF
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

26 December 2025

Editorial for “Sustainable and Digital Transformation of Road Infrastructures”

and
Department of Civil Engineering, Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Azurem, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Infrastructures2026, 11(1), 12;https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11010012 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable and Digital Transformation of Road Infrastructures
Version Notes
Order Reprints
Road infrastructure is increasingly recognized as a critical asset for economic development, social cohesion, and territorial connectivity. However, it is under unprecedented pressure from climate change, resource scarcity, environmental constraints, and rapidly evolving societal expectations. Traditional construction materials, design approaches, and maintenance practices—mostly dependent on non-renewable resources and periodic inspections—are increasingly recognized as insufficient to ensure the long-term sustainability, resilience, and efficiency of road networks [1]. As a result, the transformation of road infrastructure is now widely understood to be a dual process in which sustainability and digitalization must evolve together rather than independently or sequentially [2].
Recent research has focused on reducing the environmental footprint of road construction and maintenance by adopting circular economy principles, using renewable or waste-derived materials, and optimizing life-cycle performance [3,4]. As a result, there is a growing amount of attention being paid to bio-based binders, alternative aggregates, recycled materials, and innovative mix designs to reduce dependence on petroleum-based products and minimize greenhouse gas emissions. These approaches are increasingly supported by experimental and field evidence, showing that environmental benefits can be achieved without compromising performance, durability, or safety [5,6]. The relevance of these developments is reinforced by broader concerns about bio-sustainability, biodiversity protection, and the responsible use of natural resources within transport infrastructure systems [7].
Climate change has emerged as a significant challenge with respect to the performance of road infrastructure. Increased temperature variability, more frequent extreme-weather events, and altered loading conditions require pavement structures and materials that can maintain functionality in more aggressive and uncertain environments. Recent studies have focused on performance-based design, advanced material characterization, and resilience-oriented assessment frameworks that explicitly account for climatic effects throughout the infrastructure life cycle [8,9]. These advances can help give rise to more robust design decisions, extend service life, and reduce long-term maintenance and adaptation costs.
Alongside material and structural innovation, the digital transformation of road infrastructure is rapidly reshaping how assets are monitored, managed, and maintained. Advances in sensing technologies, data acquisition systems, and communication networks enable the continuous collection of large volumes of data on traffic, environmental conditions, and structural responses [10]. When combined with artificial intelligence, machine learning, and advanced data analytics, these technologies support a shift from reactive to predictive and preventive maintenance strategies, improving resource efficiency and enhancing the long-term performance of road assets [11,12].
Recent advances in automated inspection, computer vision, and intelligent monitoring systems further illustrate this transition. Applications such as image-based distress detection, connected-vehicle data, fiber-optic sensing, and remote inspection platforms demonstrate how digital tools can enhance safety, reduce inspection costs, and increase temporal and spatial resolution in infrastructure condition assessment [13,14]. Notably, these approaches directly contribute to sustainability objectives by optimizing maintenance interventions, reducing unnecessary material consumption, and minimizing traffic disruptions throughout infrastructure’s life cycle.
From a broader perspective, the transformation of road infrastructure is closely tied to ongoing shifts in mobility and energy. The electrification of transport, particularly in freight corridors, requires integrated planning to align road infrastructure development with energy supply, charging infrastructure deployment, and traffic demand [15]. This need highlights the growing interdisciplinary nature of road infrastructure research, integrating materials engineering, data science, transportation planning, and energy systems.
More recently, the concept of digital twins has gained prominence as a unifying framework for infrastructure management. By integrating sensing, modeling, simulation, and decision-support tools into a single digital environment, digital twins lead to more informed, transparent, and adaptive management strategies [16,17]. Within the broader vision of Construction 5.0, these approaches emphasize not only efficiency and automation but also resilience, sustainability, and human-centered decision-making.
Beyond technological and material innovation, the effective implementation of sustainable and digital road infrastructure increasingly depends on broader institutional and societal frameworks. Public procurement, standardization, and technical specifications, as key enablers of change, have recently been attracting an increasing amount of attention. Moving beyond decision-making processes that are predominantly based on initial cost or isolated performance indicators, there is a clear need for more holistic assessment frameworks that explicitly value durability, life-cycle performance, resilience to climate change, circularity, recyclability, and environmental protection, including biodiversity considerations. Such approaches also create opportunities for innovation-driven markets, skill development, and new forms of employment, reinforcing the societal dimension of infrastructure sustainability [18]. While these aspects were not the primary focus of this Special Issue, they are essential conditions for translating scientific advances in sustainability and digitalization into real-world impacts and long-term public value.
In parallel, emerging modeling approaches at the molecular scale are beginning to provide deeper insight into aging mechanisms, material interactions, and durability phenomena in paving materials. Although still in the early stages of practical application, these approaches offer promising pathways to explaining how processes at the microscale influence macroscopic performance, surface characteristics, and long-term behavior, thereby supporting the development of more durable, sustainable, and resilient materials [19,20]. Such perspectives are expected to become increasingly relevant in future research.
The themes addressed in this Special Issue align closely with current international research agendas and policy frameworks. European strategies, including the Green Deal, the Circular Economy Action Plan, and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy [21,22], along with global perspectives from organizations such as the World Bank, OECD, PIARC, and FHWA, consistently emphasize the need for sustainable, resilient, and digitally enabled transport infrastructure [23,24,25,26,27]. The recent launch of the HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-07 call further confirms the strategic relevance and timeliness of research on the sustainable and digital transformation of road infrastructure [28].
The contributions collected in this Special Issue reflect these broader trends and offer concrete examples of how research is addressing pressing global challenges. The authors of recent studies have advanced sustainable pavement materials by developing bio-based binders and incorporating alternative or recycled constituents, thereby reducing environmental impacts while maintaining functional performance [29,30]. In parallel, other contributions have demonstrated how digital technologies—such as embedded sensing systems, data-driven monitoring, and artificial intelligence—enable more efficient, scalable, and predictive approaches to infrastructure condition assessment and maintenance [31,32]. At a more integrative level, the inclusion of a review on cognitive digital twins within the Construction 5.0 paradigm highlights how sustainability, digitalization, and human-centered decision-making can be jointly addressed in road infrastructure management [33]. Collectively, these contributions reinforce the view that future progress in road infrastructure engineering will depend on integrating sustainability principles, digital technologies, life-cycle thinking, climate resilience, and societal considerations. Thus, this Special Issue offers a snapshot of an evolving research landscape rather than a closed body of work.
Given the pace of technological development and the ongoing urgency of sustainability and climate challenges, the editors anticipate that these themes will remain highly relevant in the near future. Preparing a second edition of this Special Issue is therefore timely, offering an opportunity to capture emerging advances, particularly in areas such as biosustainable materials, digital twins, resilience assessment, societal impact evaluation, and data-driven infrastructure management.
The editors are grateful to the authors for their contributions, the reviewers for their thorough and helpful feedback, and the Infrastructures editorial team for their support. We hope that this Special Issue will advance research, policy, and practice in road infrastructure toward greater sustainability, digital intelligence, and resilience.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, all authors; writing—original draft preparation, all authors; writing—review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kapatsa, C.; Kavishe, N.; Zulu, S.L.; Maro, G. Sustainability assessment indicators of road infrastructure projects: A systematic literature review. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lozano-Ramírez, N.E.; Sánchez, O.; Carrasco-Beltrán, D.; Vidal-Méndez, S.; Castañeda, K. Digitalization and Sustainability in Linear Projects Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aryan, Y.; Dikshit, A.K.; Shinde, A.M. A critical review of the life cycle assessment studies on road pavements and road infrastructures. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 336, 117697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, Z.; Kringos, N. Transition from linear to circular economy in pavement engineering: A historical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 449, 141809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gu, F.; Ma, W.; West, R.C.; Taylor, A.J.; Zhang, Y. Structural performance and sustainability assessment of cold central-plant and in-place recycled asphalt pavements: A case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 1513–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Espinosa, L.V.; Gadler, F.; Mota, R.V.; Guatimosim, F.V.; Camargo, I.; Vasconcelos, K.; Barros, R.M.V.; Bernucci, L.L.B. Multi-scale study of bio-binder mixtures as surface layer: Laboratory evaluation and field application and monitoring. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 287, 122982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hlatshwayo, T.I.; Zungu, M.M.; Collinson-Jonker, W.J.; Downs, C.T. Mainstreaming ecological connectivity and wildlife needs in green road transport infrastructure planning in South Africa. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 371, 123062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, H.J.; Love, P.E.D.; Sing, M.C.P.; Niu, B.; Zhao, J. Conceptual framework of life-cycle performance measurement: Ensuring the resilience of transport infrastructure assets. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2019, 77, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qiao, Y.; Dawson, A.R.; Parry, T.; Flintsch, G.; Wang, W. Flexible pavements and climate change: A comprehensive review and implications. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Senkans, U.; Silkans, N.; Spolitis, S.; Braunfelds, J. Comprehensive Analysis of FBG and Distributed Rayleigh, Brillouin, and Raman Optical Sensor-Based Solutions for Road Infrastructure Monitoring Applications. Sensors 2025, 25, 5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Shang, J.; Zhang, A.A.; Dong, Z.; Zhang, H.; He, A. Automated pavement detection and artificial intelligence pavement image data processing technology. Autom. Constr. 2024, 168, 105797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fathy, A.E.A.E.R.; Abdel-Hamid, M.; Abdelhaleem, H.M. Developing a predictive maintenance model for the rehabilitation of roads’ assets. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2025, 25, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. El Hakea, A.H.; Fakhr, M.W. Recent computer vision applications for pavement distress and condition assessment. Autom. Constr. 2023, 146, 104664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chapeleau, X.; Blanc, J.; Hornych, P.; Gautier, J.L.; Carroget, J. Assessment of cracks detection in pavement by a distributed fiber optic sensing technology. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2017, 7, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, F.; Taylor, N.; Kringos, N. Electrification of roads: Opportunities and challenges. Appl. Energy 2015, 150, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vieira, J.; Martins, J.P.; Almeida, N.M.; Patrício, H.; Morgado, J.G. Towards Resilient and Sustainable Rail and Road Networks: A Systematic Literature Review on Digital Twins. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yan, Y.; Ni, L.; Sun, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, J. Digital Twin Enabling Technologies for Advancing Road Engineering and Lifecycle Applications. Engineering 2025, 44, 184–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karlsson, I.; Rootzén, J.; Johnsson, F. Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains—Analysis of a Swedish road construction project. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 120, 109651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, L.; Chu, L.; Fwa, T.F. Molecular dynamics analysis of oxidative aging effects on thermodynamic and interfacial bonding properties of asphalt mixtures. Constr. Build Mater. 2021, 269, 121299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yin, P.; Pan, B.; Li, Z.; Jiao, B.; Liu, Y. Multiscale Analysis of the Function Mechanism of Aging Action on the Adhesion Properties between Asphalt and Aggregate. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2024, 36, 04024262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. European Commission. Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy—Putting European Transport on Track for the Future; COM(2020) 789 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0789 (accessed on 18 December 2025).
  22. European Commission. The European Green Deal; COM(2019) 640 final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN (accessed on 18 December 2025).
  23. Global Center on Adaptation. Climate Resilient Infrastructure Handbook; Global Center on Adaptation: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hallegatte, S.; Rentschler, J.; Rozenberg, J. Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Infrastructure for a Climate-Resilient Future; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Federal Highway Administration. The FHWA R&T Story: Innovating the Future of Transportation; FHWA-HRT-22-035; Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. Available online: https://highways.dot.gov/sites/fhwa.dot.gov/files/2021-12/HRT-22035.pdf (accessed on 19 December 2025).
  27. PIARC. Envisioning the Transport Agency of the Future. In State of Existing Knowledge; World Road Association: Paris, France, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  28. European Commission. Innovative Construction and Maintenance, with the Use of New Materials and Techniques, for Resilient and Sustainable Transport Infrastructure; HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-07; Horizon Europe: Brussels, Belgium, 2025; Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/programme/id/HORIZON_HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-07 (accessed on 20 December 2025).
  29. Frey, M.R.; Williams, S.L.; Srubar, W.V.; Torres-Machi, C. Characterization and Evaluation of Agar as a Bio-Based Asphalt Binder Alternative. Infrastructures 2025, 10, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Apaza, F.R.; Fernández Vázquez, V.; Paje, S.E.; Gulisano, F.; Gagliardi, V.; Saiz Rodríguez, L.; Gallego Medina, J. Towards Sustainable Road Pavements: Sound Absorption in Rubber-Modified Asphalt Mixtures. Infrastructures 2024, 9, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rebelo, F.J.P.; Oliveira, J.R.M.; Silva, H.M.R.D.; Sá, J.O.E.; Marecos, V.; Afonso, J. Installation and Use of a Pavement Monitoring System Based on Fibre Bragg Grating Optical Sensors. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, H.; Dong, Y.; Hou, Y.; Cheng, X.; Xie, P.; Di, K. Research on Asphalt Pavement Surface Distress Detection Technology Coupling Deep Learning and Object Detection Algorithms. Infrastructures 2025, 10, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Oditallah, M.; Alam, M.; Ekambaram, P.; Ranjha, S. Review and Insights Toward Cognitive Digital Twins in Pavement Assets for Construction 5.0. Infrastructures 2025, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Download PDF
Bridging Gaps in Landslide Mapping: A Semi-Quantitative Empirical Framework for Delineating Key Areas to Improve Collection of Essential Field-Based and Supplementary Remote-Based Data
Previous