The Socioeconomic Impact of Coastal Environment Changes on Fishing Communities and Adaptation Strategies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Estimation of LUCC
2.3. Qualitative Research Methods
2.4. AHP Questionnaire Design
3. Results
3.1. Interviews Summary
3.1.1. Factors Influencing Oyster Farming
3.1.2. Challenges in Oyster Farming
3.1.3. Strategies for Adapting to the Socioeconomic and Sustainable Development of the Coast
3.2. AHP
3.2.1. Aquafarmers
3.2.2. Fisheries Organizations
3.2.3. Government and Scholars
4. Discussion
4.1. Risk Communication Is Facilitated by Increasing Social Capital and Adopting the Views of Different Stakeholders
4.2. Strategic Planning for Variation and Uncertainty Is Required in Fisheries and Aquaculture Management
4.3. Adaptation Strategies Should Strike a Balance between Risk and Return
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; ISBN 1-56973-597-2. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Hou, X.; Li, X.; Song, B.; Wang, C. Assessing and predicting changes in ecosystem service values based on land use/cover change in the Bohai Rim coastal zone. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 111, 106004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranasinghe, R. On the need for a new generation of coastal change models for the 21st century. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costanza, R.; De Groot, R.; Sutton, P.; Van der Ploeg, S.; Anderson, S.J.; Kubiszewski, I.; Turner, R.K. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 26, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- She, J.; Guan, Z.; Cai, F.; Pu, L.; Tan, J.; Chen, T. Simulation of land use changes in a coastal reclaimed area with dynamic shorelines. Sustainability 2017, 9, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klintenberg, P.; Seely, M.; Christiansson, C. Local and national perceptions of environmental change in central Northern Namibia: Do they correspond? J. Arid. Environ. 2007, 69, 506–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toh, F.A.; Angwafo, T.E.; Ndam, L.M.; Antoine, M.Z. The socio-economic impact of land use and land cover change on the inhabitants of Mount Bambouto Caldera of the Western Highlands of Cameroon. Adv. Remote Sens. 2018, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillie, R.D. Causes of coastal erosion in Pacific island nations. J. Coast. Res. Spec. Issue 1997, 24, 173–204. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, T.W.; Lin, T.Y.; Tseng, I.F. Human impact on coastal erosion in Taiwan. J. Coast. Res. 2007, 23, 961–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.C.; Chen, C.C.; McCarl, B. Evaluating the economic impacts of crop yield change and sea level rise induced by climate change on Taiwan's agricultural sector. Agric. Econ. 2012, 43, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guleria, S. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Risks to Coastal Communities. In Development in Coastal Zones and Disaster Management; Palgrave Macmillan: Singapore, 2020; pp. 171–184. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. FAO Yearbook, Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics 2019/FAO Annuaire; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021; ISBN 978-92-5-135410-0. [Google Scholar]
- Mazur, N.A.; Curtis, A.L. Understanding Community Perceptions of Aquaculture: Lessons from Australia. Aquac. Int. 2008, 16, 601–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Folke, C.; Kautsky, N. Aquaculture with its environment: Prospects for sustainability. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 1992, 17, 5–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsiao, K.H.; Liu, J.K.; Chen, D.K.; Hsu, W.C.; Ho, H.Y. Change Detection of Wai-Shan-Din Sandbar by Combining Multi-Temporal Imageries and Airborne LiDAR data. J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2007, 12, 419–429. [Google Scholar]
- Tsai, Y.N.; Shi, G.Z.; Chien, C.H.; Kuo, C.A.; Yang, M.D. Study on the Topography Changing with Shoreline, Area and Volume at Wai-San-Ding Shoal. In Proceedings of the 37th Ocean Engineering Conference in Taiwan National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, 12–13 November 2015; pp. 361–366. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, H.K.; Lai, Y.C.; Chen, W.W. Shoreline Evolution of the Waisanding Barrier Using Waterline Detection from Satellite Images. J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2017, 22, 243–262. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, H.Y.; Tseng, K.H.; Chien, H.; Chen, Y.D. Utilizing Multitemporal Satellite Images to Investigate Topographical Changes of Waisanding Sandbar. Taiwan J. Geoinform. 2019, 7, 103–119. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, J.C.; Shih, T.T.; Chen, H.L. A study on Coastal Changes of Chianan Plain in Southwestern Taiwan. Geogr. Res. 1998, 28, 83–105. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, C.P.; Huang, H.W.; Lu, H.J. Fishermen’s perceptions of coastal fisheries management regulations: Key factors to rebuilding coastal fishery resources in Taiwan. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2019, 172, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazur, N.A.; Curtis, A.L. Risk Perceptions, Aquaculture, and Issues of Trust: Lessons from Australia. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2006, 19, 791–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, J.C.; Chen, H.I.; Ho, Y.D. The Production Economic Analysis of Oyster Culture in Taiwan. J. Taiwan Fish. Res. 1998, 6, 55–70. [Google Scholar]
- Boyce, C.; Neale, P. Conducting In-Depth Interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input; Pathfinder International: Watertown, MA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Merton, R.K.; Fiske, M.; Kendall, P.L. The Focused Interview: A Manual of Problems and Procedures, 2nd ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; ISBN 978-0029209868. [Google Scholar]
- Bloor, M.; Frankland, J.; Thomas, M.; Robson, K. Trends and uses of focus groups. In Focus Groups in Social Research; Sage: New York, NY, USA, 2001; Volume 1, pp. 1–18. ISBN 978-0761957430. [Google Scholar]
- Saaty, T.L. Analytic Hierarchy Process; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Saaty, T.L.; Vargas, L.G. How to Make a Decision. In Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2001; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- Vaidya, O.S.; Kumar, S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006, 169, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, J.; Jia, Y.; Tang, L.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Huang, N.; Hua, L. Assessment of urbanization-induced ecological risks in an area with significant ecosystem services based on land use/cover change scenarios. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2018, 25, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Everest, T.; Sungur, A.; Özcan, H. Determination of agricultural land suitability with a multiple-criteria decision-making method in Northwestern Turkey. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 1073–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; Kang, H. Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Prediction and Optimization of LUCC Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Models: A Case Study of Mentougou District, Beijing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taiwan Fishery Agency. Taiwan Fisheries Statistical Yearbook; Taiwan Fishery Agency: Keelung, Taiwan, 2021.
- Putnam, R.D. Tuning in, Tuning out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. Political Sci. Politics 1995, 28, 664–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adger, W.N. Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. In Der Klimawandel; VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2003; pp. 327–345. [Google Scholar]
- Wolf, J.; Adger, W.N.; Irene, L.; Vanessa, A.; Rosalind, R. Social Capital, Individual Responses to Heat Waves and Climate Change Adaptation: An Empirical Study of Two UK Cities. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2010, 20, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woods, P.J.; Macdonald, J.I.; Bárðarson, H.; Bonanomi, S.; Boonstra, W.J.; Cornell, G.; Cripps, G.; Danielsen, R.; Färber, L.; Ferreira, A.S.A.; et al. A review of adaptation options in fisheries management to support resilience and transition under socio-ecological change. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2022, 79, 463–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindell, M.K.; Perry, R.W. Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2004; ISBN 0-7619-0650-9. [Google Scholar]
- Bodin, Ö.; Crona, B.I. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Glob. Environ. Chang. 2009, 19, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robert, S.; Schleyer-Lindenmann, A. How ready are we to cope with climate change? Extent of adaptation to sea level rise and coastal risks in local planning documents of southern France. Land Use Policy 2021, 104, 105354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnett, J.; Breakwell, G.M. Risk perception and experience: Hazard personality profiles and individual differences. Risk Anal. 2001, 21, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, H.; Nguyen, Q.; Kervyn, M. Factors influencing people’s knowledge, attitude, and practice in land use dynamics: A case study in Ca Mau province in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. Land Use Policy 2018, 72, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cinner, J.E.; Huchery, C.; Hicks, C.C.; Daw, T.M.; Marshall, N.; Wamukota, A.; Allison, E.H. Changes in adaptive capacity of Kenyan fishing communities. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 872–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keskitalo, E.C.H.; Kulyasova, A.A. The role of governance in community adaptation to climate change. Polar Res. 2009, 28, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryndum-Buchholz, A.; Tittensor, D.P.; Lotze, H.K. The status of climate change adaptation in fisheries management: Policy, legislation and implementation. Fish Fish. 2021, 22, 1248–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rees, S.E.; Foster, N.L.; Langmead, O.; Pittman, S.; Johnson, D.E. Defining the qualitative elements of Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 with regard to the marine and coastal environment in order to strengthen global efforts for marine biodiversity conservation outlined in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 14. Mar. Policy 2018, 93, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasper, D.; Shah, A.; Tankha, S. The framing of sustainable consumption and production in SDG 12. Glob. Policy 2019, 10, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanchard, J.L.; Watson, R.A.; Fulton, E.A.; Cottrell, R.S.; Nash, K.L.; Bryndum-Buchholz, A.; Büchner, M.; Carozza, D.A.; Cheung, W.W.L.; Elliott, J.; et al. Linked sustainability challenges and trade-offs among fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 1240–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Interview Topic/Dimension | Finding |
---|---|
Factors influencing oyster farming/Environment and Climate |
|
Challenges in oyster farming/Industry and Management |
|
Strategies for adapting to the socioeconomic and sustainable development of the coast/Adaptation Strategies |
|
Aquafarmers (n = 19) | Fisheries Organizations (n = 10) | Government and Scholars (n = 9) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dimension/Factor | Weight | Rank | Weight | Rank | Weight | Rank |
Environment and Climate | ||||||
E1. Drifting sand | 0.404 | 1 | 0.216 | 3 | 0.224 | 3 |
E2. Water flow | 0.170 | 4 | 0.135 | 4 | 0.279 | 2 |
E3. Seawater quality | 0.203 | 3 | 0.333 | 1 | 0.332 | 1 |
E4. Typhoon or southwest airflow | 0.223 | 2 | 0.317 | 2 | 0.165 | 4 |
Industry and Management | ||||||
I1. Fishery labor force | 0.089 | 6 | 0.133 | 4 | 0.075 | 7 |
I2. Oyster production | 0.203 | 2 | 0.165 | 3 | 0.137 | 4 |
I3. Oyster market price | 0.159 | 3 | 0.217 | 1 | 0.285 | 1 |
I4. Cost of aquaculture activities | 0.222 | 1 | 0.199 | 2 | 0.174 | 2 |
I5. Cost of aquaculture management | 0.123 | 4 | 0.089 | 6 | 0.080 | 6 |
I6. Oyster importation | 0.083 | 7 | 0.074 | 7 | 0.155 | 3 |
I7. Ocean and fisheries management | 0.122 | 5 | 0.123 | 5 | 0.093 | 5 |
Adaptation Strategies | ||||||
A1. Sand stabilization of the Waisanding Sandbar | 0.220 | 2 | 0.145 | 3 | 0.233 | 1 |
A2. Waterway dredging/silt removal | 0.145 | 4 | 0.128 | 4 | 0.150 | 3 |
A3. Impose oyster import control or tariffs | 0.254 | 1 | 0.295 | 1 | 0.108 | 6 |
A4. Develop recreational fishery sector | 0.065 | 7 | 0.089 | 6 | 0.146 | 4 |
A5. Install wind turbines on the Waisanding Sandbar | 0.072 | 6 | 0.053 | 7 | 0.058 | 7 |
A6. Increase the value of the oyster industry (by reusing oyster shells) | 0.158 | 3 | 0.162 | 2 | 0.165 | 2 |
A7. Provide guidance on industry transformation | 0.086 | 5 | 0.128 | 4 | 0.141 | 5 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hsiao, Y.-J. The Socioeconomic Impact of Coastal Environment Changes on Fishing Communities and Adaptation Strategies. Fishes 2022, 7, 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7050243
Hsiao Y-J. The Socioeconomic Impact of Coastal Environment Changes on Fishing Communities and Adaptation Strategies. Fishes. 2022; 7(5):243. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7050243
Chicago/Turabian StyleHsiao, Yao-Jen. 2022. "The Socioeconomic Impact of Coastal Environment Changes on Fishing Communities and Adaptation Strategies" Fishes 7, no. 5: 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7050243
APA StyleHsiao, Y. -J. (2022). The Socioeconomic Impact of Coastal Environment Changes on Fishing Communities and Adaptation Strategies. Fishes, 7(5), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7050243