Next Article in Journal
Effects of Airfoil Parameters on the Cavitation Performance of Water Jet Propulsion Pumps
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Disruption of Airflow and Particle Distribution by Surgical Personnel and Lighting Fixture in Operating Rooms
Previous Article in Special Issue
AI-Driven Surrogate Model for Room Ventilation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Machine Learning in Fluid Dynamics—Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) Using Sparse Data: A Review

by
Mouhammad El Hassan
1,*,
Ali Mjalled
2,
Philippe Miron
3,
Martin Mönnigmann
2 and
Nikolay Bukharin
4
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
2
Automatic Control and Systems Theory, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätstrasse 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany
3
Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
4
The Southern Alberta Institute of Technology, Calgary, AB T2M 0L4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fluids 2025, 10(9), 226; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10090226
Submission received: 11 April 2025 / Revised: 1 August 2025 / Accepted: 18 August 2025 / Published: 28 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Fluid Mechanics)

Abstract

Fluid mechanics often involves complex systems characterized by a large number of physical parameters, which are usually described by experimental and numerical sparse data (temporal or spatial). The difficulty of obtaining complete spatio-temporal datasets is a common issue with conventional approaches, such as computational fluid dynamics (CFDs) and various experimental methods, particularly when evaluating and modeling turbulent flows. This review paper focuses on the integration of machine learning (ML), specifically physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), as a means to address this challenge. By directly incorporating governing physical equations into neural network training, PINNs present a novel method that allows for the reconstruction of flow from sparse and noisy data. This review examines various applications in fluid mechanics where sparse data is a common problem and evaluates the effectiveness of PINNs in enhancing flow prediction accuracy. An overview of diverse PINNs methods, their applications, and outcomes is discussed, demonstrating their flexibility and effectiveness in addressing challenges related to sparse data and illustrating that the future of fluid mechanics lies in the synergy between data-driven approaches and established physical theories.
Keywords: physics informed neural networks (PINNs); sparse data; data-driven modeling; PIV; CFD; machine learning in fluids; sparse data reconstruction physics informed neural networks (PINNs); sparse data; data-driven modeling; PIV; CFD; machine learning in fluids; sparse data reconstruction

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El Hassan, M.; Mjalled, A.; Miron, P.; Mönnigmann, M.; Bukharin, N. Machine Learning in Fluid Dynamics—Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) Using Sparse Data: A Review. Fluids 2025, 10, 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10090226

AMA Style

El Hassan M, Mjalled A, Miron P, Mönnigmann M, Bukharin N. Machine Learning in Fluid Dynamics—Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) Using Sparse Data: A Review. Fluids. 2025; 10(9):226. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10090226

Chicago/Turabian Style

El Hassan, Mouhammad, Ali Mjalled, Philippe Miron, Martin Mönnigmann, and Nikolay Bukharin. 2025. "Machine Learning in Fluid Dynamics—Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) Using Sparse Data: A Review" Fluids 10, no. 9: 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10090226

APA Style

El Hassan, M., Mjalled, A., Miron, P., Mönnigmann, M., & Bukharin, N. (2025). Machine Learning in Fluid Dynamics—Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) Using Sparse Data: A Review. Fluids, 10(9), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10090226

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop