Next Article in Journal
Cytotoxicity and Nitric Oxide Production Inhibitory Activities of Compounds Isolated from the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Curvularia sp.
Next Article in Special Issue
Global Transcriptome Profiling Identified Transcription Factors, Biological Process, and Associated Pathways for Pre-Harvest Aflatoxin Contamination in Groundnut
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Disinfectants for Environmental Control of a Lethal Amphibian Pathogen
Previous Article in Special Issue
Candida albicans/Macrophage Biointerface on Human and Porcine Decellularized Adipose Matrices
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 7
Issue 6
10.3390/jof7060407
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Radionuclide Imaging of Fungal Infections and Correlation with the Host Defense Response

by
Alfred O. Ankrah
1,2,3,
Mike M. Sathekge
2,
Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx
3 and
Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
3,*
1
National Centre for Radiotherapy Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra GA-222 7974, Ghana
2
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
3
Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(6), 407; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060407
Submission received: 17 April 2021 / Revised: 10 May 2021 / Accepted: 21 May 2021 / Published: 22 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Host Defense against Fungi)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The human response to invading fungi includes a series of events that detect, kill, or clear the fungi. If the metabolic host response is unable to eliminate the fungi, an infection ensues. Some of the host response’s metabolic events to fungi can be imaged with molecules labelled with radionuclides. Several important clinical applications have been found with radiolabelled biomolecules of inflammation. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose is the tracer that has been most widely investigated in the host defence of fungi. This tracer has added value in the early detection of infection, in staging and visualising dissemination of infection, and in monitoring antifungal treatment. Radiolabelled antimicrobial peptides showed promising results, but large prospective studies in fungal infection are lacking. Other tracers have also been used in imaging events of the host response, such as the migration of white blood cells at sites of infection, nutritional immunity in iron metabolism, and radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies. Many tracers are still at the preclinical stage. Some tracers require further studies before translation into clinical use. The application of therapeutic radionuclides offers a very promising clinical application of these tracers in managing drug-resistant fungi.

1. Introduction

Fungal infections cause high morbidity and mortality, especially in immunocompromised patients [1]. The human body recognises fungi invading the body by pattern recognition receptors. The pattern recognition receptors are genetically determined receptors that recognise molecular sequences associated with fungi. These receptors are different from the receptors of the adaptive immune system formed by T and B lymphocytes in response to an antigenic challenge. Dectin-1 best illustrates the function of pattern recognition receptors in fungal infections. Dectin-1 recognises B-glucan sequences in the inner layer of the cell wall present in all fungi species [2,3,4]. Once the host recognises the fungi, the receptor-pathogen interaction sets intracellular events that result in the formation of chemokines and cytokines that modulate inflammation. These chemokines and cytokines cause white blood cells to migrate to the infection site, leading to the phagocytosis of the fungi, and eventually to the killing and clearing of the fungi [2,5]. Imaging these inflammatory events showed added value in the management of these infections.
Anatomic-based imaging in infection often depends on structural changes that may not occur early in the sequence of the host’s reaction to the fungi. Similarly, after an established fungal infection is treated with antifungal agents, the anatomic changes associated with the infection may persist long after the offending fungi are cleared. The metabolic changes that occur with inflammation due to the host response precede the anatomic changes, and can be used during and after the treatment. These metabolic changes can be imaged with radionuclide-based tracers [6].
Radionuclide imaging includes positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and provides functional data of structures deep within the body. PET and SPECT imaging rely on the radiolabelling of chemical substances that resemble or are actual biomolecules of the body’s chemical processes. The radionuclides emit energy directly as photons or after initially forming positrons. SPECT or PET camera systems image the emitted photons. These cameras allow the three-dimensional acquisition of pathophysiologic processes in the body. PET and SPECT imaging are usually combined with anatomic-based imaging (PET/CT and SPECT/CT). The anatomic-based imaging allows anatomic localisation and attenuation correction (when possible) of PET and SPECT images. PET imaging has better resolution than SPECT, and quantification of radiotracer tissue uptake has been better validated for PET in clinical practice. SPECT is more widely available and relatively cheaper [7].
In this review, we describe radionuclide-based PET and SPECT imaging agents used in inflammation and their correlation to the events of host defence of fungi. Medical imaging plays a vital role in the management of fungal infections [8]. Imaging is part of the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected fungal infection [9]. Imaging is able to stage the infection, to detect occult or disseminated infection, to monitor antifungal therapy, and to provide prognostic information [10,11].

2. PET Imaging

PET imaging is performed after the injection of PET tracers into a patient. PET tracers are compounds in which an element is replaced by a radioactive positron emitter. A positron is a positive electron that is not naturally present in nature, but is produced by radioactivity. After a positron is released by radioactive decay, the positron travels a short distance and combines with an electron in the host tissue or environment. The combined positron and electron undergo annihilation, and their mass is converted to energy; the energy is given of as two 511 keV photons travelling in opposite directions. A PET camera system is able to detect the two electrons simultaneously. An image is reconstructed from the photons to provide a three-dimensional representation of the underlying pathologic or physiologic process that the PET tracer that was injected was meant to image.

2.1. 18F-FDG PET in Fungal Infections

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is a glucose analogue and the most common PET tracer in the clinical setting. 18F-FDG is widely used as the radiolabelled agent of choice in imaging many infections and inflammatory conditions [12,13,14,15,16]. It has been used in the evaluation of different aspects of fungal infections. After fungi invade the body’s tissues, they are recognised by pattern recognition receptors which, in turn, initiate intracellular signals that result in inflammation to clear the fungi. The inflammatory processes that are activated use energy. These energy-dependent processes result in the uptake of glucose by the immune cells. The increased glucose uptake by the GLUT transporters on the cell membrane of immune cells generates a signal with 18F-FDG. This forms the basis of imaging inflammation with PET [17]. 18F-FDG PET is usually integrated with computed tomography (CT). Recently, some systems also integrate PET with magnetic resonance imaging in clinical practice. The positron 18F has a half-life of 110 min, allowing enough time for the tracer to be taken up in the inflamed tissue and to be imaged by PET, while not lasting too long in the host to give an unnecessarily high radiation burden.
Several case reports and case series with relatively small numbers documented the ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to detect lesions of fungal infections early before anatomic changes, the usefulness in detecting occult lesions and detecting dissemination, and the ability to monitor antifungal therapy [18,19,20,21,22]. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT was further confirmed in several larger studies [23,24,25,26,27].
The pattern of uptake may direct the imaging specialist to the presence of a fungal infection. Bilateral adrenal gland uptake, for example, may occur in Cryptococcus or Histoplasmosis sp. infections. Figure 1 shows a patient with Cryptococcus neoformans with bilateral adrenal gland uptake due to the fungi [20,28,29,30,31]. Knowledge of the epidemiology of fungal infection and the patterns that may occur is important in the interpretation of 18F-FDG PET/CT in fungal infections.
There are numerous species of fungi that may cause an invasive fungal infection. In the literature, most of the case reports and studies focus on radionuclide imaging of Candida sp. and Aspergillus sp. because these are often the most common species in blood-stream infection and infections among the immunocompromised, such as patients with hematologic malignancies. 18F-FDG PET/CT has been shown to be useful in the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment in other fungi such as Histoplasmosis sp. Cryptococus neoformis and Pneumocystis jeroveci pneumonia [19,28,29,30].

2.2. Other PET Tracers Used for Inflammation and Their Role in Fungal Infection

2.2.1. PET Labelled Siderophores

One method of defence by the human body from pathogens is to ensure that the nutrients needed for the survival of the microorganism are not available to the pathogen. These nutrients, such as iron or copper, are highly regulated by being bound to various molecules, so they are not readily available to pathogens. This is called nutritional immunity. To overcome this, fungi and other pathogens adopt various mechanisms [32]. Fungi employ siderophores to overcome the relative deficiency of iron caused by the host nutritional immunity. Iron is an important cofactor for different physiologic processes, such as respiration, metabolism of amino acids and biosynthesis of nucleic acids and steroid compounds [33,34]. Siderophores tend to be species-specific. More than 500 different structures of siderophores have been identified among fungi, bacteria, and other microorganisms [35]. Some siderophores are endogenous in the pathogens, while others are secreted outside the pathogen. Aspergillus fumigatus secretes two siderophores—fusarinine C and triacetylfusarinine C—in addition to two endogenous siderophores it possesses [36,37]. In fungi, siderophore–iron transporters in the fungal membrane transport secreted siderophores which have chelated iron from the host into the fungal cell. Siderophore–iron transporters occur in most fungal species, and this transporter is only found in fungi [37,38]. These factors make secreted siderophores a good substrate to target fungi. Siderophores have been labelled with PET radioisotopes, which are analogues of iron: Gallium 68 (68Ga) with a half-life of 68 min, and Zirconium 89 (89Zr) with a half-life of 78 h [39,40]. PET imaging with 68Ga has gained prominence recently with GMP-grade Germanium 68/Gallium 68 generator availability [41]. The short half-life of 68 min gives 68Ga favourable radiation burden characteristics compared to the longer-lived 89Zr. The PET tracers 68Ga or 89Zr as iron analogues are chelated with siderophores as a complex and injected into the patient. The siderophore–iron analogue complex is transported into the fungi by the siderophore–iron transporters and allow the fungi to be imaged. These labelled siderophores demonstrated a high uptake in Aspergillus fumigatus-infected lungs with high target to nontarget ratio in rodent models. The potential translation of radiolabelled siderophores to the clinic is limited by the differences in uptake among other fungal and bacterial species. There are research studies ongoing to modify siderophores, to make them more acceptable as a PET agent for infection [40,42].

2.2.2. PET Labelled Antibodies

Antibodies produced by B lymphocytes are part of the host immune responses against fungi. The specific contribution of antibodies to the host defence against fungi has been a contentious issue. Earlier investigators suggested antibodies were not necessary for host defence against fungi in humans [43,44]. The use of monoclonal antibodies has helped advance our understanding of antibodies’ vital role in different fungal species [45,46,47,48]. The use of an agent that targets a specific molecule present on the pathogen in a similar way to a “magic bullet” offers a desirable method for targeting microbes or molecules expressed in pathophysiologic processes in the body. The combination of PET labels to antibodies targeting specific molecules in patients is referred to as immunoPET. ImmunoPET has been used extensively in oncological applications. There is an increased interest in the use of immunoPET in infectious diseases [49]. A monoclonal antibody JF5 has been developed and labelled with Copper 64 (64Cu) with a half-life of 12.7 h [50,51]. The longer half-life of 64Cu (compared with 18F) is important, as antibodies and high molecular weight molecules require a longer time to clear from the plasma. A more efficient way of producing 64Cu from a solid rather than liquid target has made the use of 64Cu more favourable [52]. The JF5 radiolabel can differentiate actively growing hyphae of Aspergillus sp. from inactive spores. JF5 binds to galactofuranose glycoprotein, which is expressed on the hyphae in medically important species of Aspergillus. Both the murine antibody and humanised antibody are currently available [50,53,54]. There is no non-specific binding of JF5 to mammalian tissues as the epitope β1,5-galactofuranose is not present in mammalian tissues. The 64Cu-JF5 showed good tracer accumulation in the lungs in invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in an animal model [50].

2.2.3. PET Labelled Antifungal Agents

Antifungal agents help combat fungal infections when the host defence is unable to clear invading fungi resulting in an infection. The antifungal agent fluconazole has been labelled with 18F. Fluconazole is a synthetic azole that inhibits ergosterol biosynthesis. Ergosterol is a lipid that is required in the synthesis of the fungal cell membrane. 18F-fluconazole was studied in preclinical animal models of candidiasis. Unfortunately, the tracer showed high renal uptake, and the uptake in tissues with fungal infection was not impressive [55,56,57].
Recently, the antifungal drug amphotericin B has been labelled with 68Ga in an in vitro model. This radiotracer showed good accumulation in inserts with clinically important moulds such as Aspergillus fumigatus, and Rhizopus arrhizus. These results must be tested in animal models of fungal infections [58].

2.2.4. Gallium 68 (68Ga) Citrate

68Ga citrate is a PET tracer that has been evaluated in infection and inflammation [59,60]. Its corresponding SPECT tracer Gallium (67Ga) citrate was used for inflammation and infection in the past, but that role has been largely supplanted by 18F-FDG. Gallium is an iron analogue, and the body iron binding proteins in the body handle it in a similar way to iron [61]. The role of iron and host nutritional immunity has been earlier described. Although the SPECT tracer (67Ga citrate) was used in fungal infections, especially in HIV patients in the past, 68Ga citrate is yet to be evaluated in fungal infections. One area it may potentially play a role in is intracranial lesions, where the accumulation of 18F-FDG in the brain may limit detection of intracranial pathology with 18F-FDG. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, 68Ga citrate showed better lesion detection of intracranial lesions, due to the absence of tracer accumulation in the brain [62]. Moreover, studies have suggested 68Ga citrate is less likely to accumulate in post-infective lesions after treatment of the different infections [62,63,64]. Large multi-centred prospective studies are needed to investigate the use of 68Ga citrate in fungi for these indications.

2.2.5. PET Labelled White Blood Cells

As part of the host response to fungi, cytokines attract white blood cells to the site of infection in the tissues. Radiolabelled white blood cell imaging using SPECT tracers is the only nuclear medicine imaging method that is able to differentiate between infection and inflammation [65,66]. The labelling of white blood cells with radionuclides is by drawing blood from the patient, separating white blood cells, radiolabelling and re-injecting them [67]. White blood cells have also been labelled with 18F-FDG to take advantage of the better resolution and image quantification of PET imaging [68]. However, the labelling efficiency of 18F-FDG was not as good as the SPECT tracer imaging methods for labelling white blood cells. Furthermore, the half-life of 18F (110 min) is not favourable for delayed imaging, and normally it takes around 20 h for the white blood cells to accumulate at the site of infection [69]. Therefore, white blood cells have been labelled with 64Cu and other longer-lived PET radioisotopes to allow for delayed imaging with PET [70,71]. White blood cell labelling has the disadvantage of the need to handle blood products. This carries the risk of transmission of blood-borne infectious disease to the staff involved in the labelling of the blood products and to the patients whose white cells are being labelled [72]. Again, some patients with fungal infections may be critically ill or also suffer from neutropenia; labelling of white blood cells under these circumstances may not be practical. Furthermore, there have been concerns about the radiation damage to the lymphocytes by the labelled radionuclide [72,73]. These factors have not allowed PET-labelled white blood cells to supplant their counterpart in infection imaging. The difficulty of labelling white blood cells in patients with fungal infection makes 18F-FDG PET the preferred method at this moment.

2.2.6. PET Labelled Antimicrobial Peptides

Antimicrobial peptides are small molecular weight cationic peptides released by immune cells to kill fungi and other pathogens as part of the innate immune response [4]. Fragments of antimicrobial peptides such as ubiquicidin (29–41) have been labelled with 68Ga [74,75]. This peptide is expected to accumulate in Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans and bacteria similarly to its SPECT counterpart, as the mechanism of uptake is the binding of the cationic peptide to the negative charge on the membrane of the microbe for both PET and SPECT tracers. The antimicrobial peptides lack a tertiary structure; hence, the different labelling methods, in the same way as the different methods used for labelling PET or SPECT tracers, may affect their ability to target and image microorganisms. Studies of the PET-labelled antimicrobial peptides are needed to see if it will be as efficient in fungi as its SPECT counterpart.

3. SPECT Tracers in Inflammation

SPECT imaging is based on the detecting photons that usually arise from a radioisotope nucleus by radioactive decay [76]. The most used radioisotope is Technetium 99 m (99mTc), which emits a photon with 140 Kev energy and has a half-life of 6 h. Other frequently used radioisotopes are Indium 111 (111In) and Gallium 67 (67Ga), with relatively longer half-lives and a significantly higher radiation burden on patients when used for imaging.

3.1. SPECT Labelled White Blood Cells

White blood cells labelled with technetium 99m (99mTc) (as 99mTc-hexamyethylpropyleneamine) or indium 111 (111In) (as 111In oxine) is the preferred nuclear imaging method of choice to differentiate infection from inflammation [66]. There are relatively few reports of the use of SPECT-labelled white cell studies in fungal infections [77]. Fungal infections have been noted to cause false-negative white cell studies due to the relative low accumulation of neutrophils compared to other infections [78]. Other agents such as 18F-FDG are preferred in imaging fungal infections.

3.2. Anti-Granulocyte Imaging

Monoclonal anti-granulocyte antibodies against granulocytes have been labelled with SPECT-based tracers to overcome the need to handle blood products [79,80,81,82,83]. There are several monoclonal anti-granulocyte antibodies targeting different antigens. The antigens include NCA, CD15, or CD66, which have been tested against infectious agents [76,79,80]. There are only two commercial agents available [66]. No large studies involving fungal infections are available, but one study found the evaluation of pulmonary fungal disease, especially pneumocystis, particularly disappointing [84].

3.3. 67Gallium Citrate

67Ga citrate is a SPECT tracer that has been used extensively in the past in infection and inflammation. The tracer is taken up at infection sites by specific and nonspecific mechanisms. The nonspecific mechanisms include the increased tracer uptake due to increased vascularity because of inflammation. The specific mechanisms are related to increased iron-binding proteins such as lactoferrin, transferrin and siderophores from the pathogen. 67Ga has a half-life of 78.3 h. The tracer gives a high radiation burden compared to 99mTc-based imaging, and after injection the patient must wait for about 24 h before imaging. The tracer was also nonspecific accumulating in noninfective lesions [85]. These factors led to the search for a better imaging agent, and 18F-FDG has taken over most of the indications 67Ga previously had. 67Ga citrate was important in the evaluation of fungal infection, especially in HIV patients [86,87].

3.4. SPECT Labelled Fluconazole

The antifungal drug fluconazole has been labelled with 99mTc. This tracer accumulated in sites infected with Candida albicans in a mouse model [88,89]. It did not accumulate in bacterial infection nor in sterile inflammation. The intensity of tracer accumulation correlated to the live fungi in infected tissue, suggesting it will be useful in monitoring antifungal therapy. The tracer performed poorly in imaging Aspergillus fumigatus. Furthermore, resistance to the antimicrobial may result in false positive results. The intensity of uptake in affected tissue was not high [61]. The agent has not been translated to humans.

3.5. SPECT Labelled Amphotericin B

Amphotericin B is another antifungal agent labelled with 99mTc with good results in in vitro studies. Amphotericin B binds irreversible to ergosterol, disrupting the integrity of the cell wall leading to death. The radiolabelled tracer accumulated in Transwell inserts infected with Aspergillus fumigatus and other relevant moulds, but not in a bacteria-infected insert. Preclinical studies of this radiolabel in an animal model would move this tracer nearer the potential clinical translation [62].

3.6. SPECT Labelled Antimicrobial Peptides

Many antimicrobial peptides have been investigated as potential agents to be labelled with 99mTc, including ubiquicidin fragments and human lactoferrin peptide [88,90,91,92]. The ubiquicidin 29–41, a fragment of the antimicrobial peptide ubiquicidin, has been labelled with 99mTc and been tested in animal model and humans. The labelled fragment accumulated in Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus and bacteria. The tracer did not accumulate in sterile inflammation or sites with killed bacteria.

3.7. SPECT Labelled Chitin Related Proteins

Chitin is an essential component of the fungal cell wall. In inflammation, different molecular sizes and concentrations of chitin affect fungal immunity differently. Depending on the size, the chitin polymer may induce an inflammatory response or an anti-inflammatory response, or may not evoke any inflammatory response [93]. SPECT-based labels of a chitin-binding protein and the enzyme chitinase have been evaluated for imaging fungal infections [94,95]. In a mouse model, 123I-chitinase showed accumulation in mice tissue infected with fungus but not in bacteria or sterile inflammation. A chitin binding protein (CBP21) also showed more accumulation in tissues infected fungi compared to bacteria. The uptake by these agents was modest, with reported target to background ratio higher than 1. No translation to humans of these agents has been done.

3.8. Other Radionuclides for Inflammation

Other components of the immune system, such as cytokines IL-1, IL-2, IL-8, and platelet factor 4 have been investigated as agents for imaging infections. Some of these have been unsuccessful due to biological activity of the radiolabel such as induction of fever by IL-1. In some other cases, the labels have found applications in other causes of inflammation but not in infection [96].
Some tissues or cells which are considered not to be a part of the immune system are involved in the host response against fungi. These include epithelial tissues, platelets, and endothelial cells. The epithelial cells express protein recognition receptors that recognise fungi and initiate host response against fungi. The integrity of epithelial tissues is essential in host defence against fungi. The lungs are the most common site of fungal infections; radiolabelled agents can assess the respiratory epithelium’s integrity. In the past, the respiratory epithelial transport has been assessed using inhaled epithelial lung clearance. This procedure is not performed routinely in clinical practice [86].

4. Application of Radionuclide Therapy in Host Defence

The labelling methods that target the fungi can be exploited for radionuclide therapy of these agents. Radionuclide therapy delivers damaging radiation to the infected or diseased tissue with minimum damage to the surrounding normal tissue. The radionuclides used for therapy are either alpha or beta particles. An alpha particle is an atomic nucleus containing two protons and two neutrons (a helium nucleus) that is emitted during radioactive decay. The charge of the two protons (2+) and the large size of the two proteins allows it to deliver most of its energy, which often leads to damage to nucleic acid material and other biomolecules killing or inhibiting the growth of cells including fungi in the vicinity of the targeted tissue. Beta particles consist of electrons released with high kinetic energy and also deposit the surrounding tissue. The relative lower mass and lesser charge of the beta particle (1-) compared to the alpha particle lets them deposit less energy compared to alpha particles, but the beta particles are able to deposit their energy over a longer range of tissue. In targeting fungi, the radionuclide attached to the biomolecule for imaging is replaced with a therapeutic radionuclide to target, kill or inhibit the growth of fungi [97]. The targeted radionuclide therapy works on the principle that the side effects are minimal, as radioactive agent is directly delivered to diseased tissues, sparing uninfected tissues. In cases of a widespread infection, however, radionuclide therapy may cause bone marrow suppression, as occurs in other radionuclide therapy, which can be predicted by the diagnostic scan [98].
There are relatively few antifungal agents available, and drug resistance against these antifungal agents is a constant challenge. The use of radioimmunotherapy in fungal infection has been tested in some animal models with encouraging results [99,100,101,102,103]. The radionuclides such as Bismuth 213 (an alpha particle) or Rhenium 188 (a beta particle) are examples of some of the labels used for therapy. Radioimmunotherapy is not subject to resistance in the same way as traditional drugs, and is independent of the patient’s immune status. Monoclonal antibodies against antigens in all fungi such as β-glycan would eliminate the need to develop or know the species before administering fungal radioimmunotherapy [97].

5. Clinical Translation of Fungal Agents

Radionuclide imaging of fungal infection has been used for imaging different aspects of the host response to fungi. PET imaging with 18F-FDG is the only radionuclide so far that has a major role in imaging the host response to fungi with wide clinical acceptance. Some promising agents are at various stages of production. Table 1 outlines the different agents and whether they have been used in humans. The clinical usage and widespread applicability depends not only on the success of the agents in imaging of fungal infections but also on the demand, ease of preparation and widespread applicability. It is likely that an imaging agent that can really distinguish between infection and inflammation and with a broad spectrum activity against different pathogens may gain wider acceptance than the specialised tracers which are limited to special centres [104].

6. Conclusions

The host defence mounted by the body against fungi affords the opportunity for radionuclide imaging with important clinical applications. However, so far, only 18F-FDG has widespread acceptance for clinical use in patients with fungal infections, for detection, staging, and therapy evaluation. Other radionuclides have been evaluated only preclinically, or are only used in small patient series. Large multi-centred prospective clinical trial must be performed to evaluate the role of these specific radionuclides in imaging fungal infections.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.O.A., M.M.S., R.A.J.O.D. and A.W.J.M.G.; formal analysis, A.O.A. and A.W.J.M.G. investigation, A.O.A. methodology, A.O.A. and A.W.J.M.G.; project administration, A.O.A., M.M.S., R.A.J.O.D. and A.W.J.M.G.; supervision, R.A.J.O.D., M.M.S. and A.W.J.M.G.; validation, A.O.A. and A.W.J.M.G.; visualization, A.O.A. and A.W.J.M.G.; writing—original draft, A.O.A.; writing— review and editing, A.O.A., M.M.S., R.A.J.O.D. and A.W.J.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Suleyman, G.; Alangaden, G.J. Nosocomial fungal infections: Epidemiology, infection control, and prevention. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 30, 1023–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Takeuchi, O.; Akira, S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 2010, 140, 805–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Verma, A.; Wüthrich, M.; Deepe, G.; Klein, B. Adaptive immunity to fungi. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 5, a019612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Salazar, F.; Brown, G.D. Antifungal innate immunity: A Perspective from the Last 10 years. J. Innate Immun. 2018, 10, 373–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Romani, L.; Puccetti, P. Controlling pathogenic inflammation to fungi. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2007, 5, 1007–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vaidyanathan, S.; Patel, C.N.; Scarsbrook, A.F.; Chowdhury, F.U. FDG PET/CT in infection and inflammation—Current and emerging clinical applications. Clin. Radiol. 2015, 70, 787–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bateman, T.M. Advantages and disadvantages of PET and SPECT in a busy clinical practice. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2012, 19, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ledoux, M.P.; Guffroy, B.; Nivoix, Y.; Simand, C.; Herbrecht, R. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 41, 80–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ruhnke, M.; Behre, G.; Buchheidt, D.; Christopeit, M.; Hamprecht, A.; Heinz, W.; Heussel, C.P.; Horger, M.; Kurzai, O.; Karthaus, M.; et al. Diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases in haematology and oncology: 2018 update of the recommendations of the infectious diseases working party of the German society for hematology and medical oncology (AGIHO). Mycoses 2018, 61, 796–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nguyen, B.J.; Burt, A.; Baldassarre, R.L.; Smitaman, E.; Morshedi, M.; Kao, S.; Chang, E.Y.; Obrzut, S. The prognostic and diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessment of symptomatic osteoarthritis. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2018, 39, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sathekge, M.M.; Ankrah, A.O.; Lawal, I.; Vorster, M. Monitoring response to therapy. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2018, 48, 166–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Arnon-Sheleg, E.; Israel, O.; Keidar, Z. PET/CT Imaging in soft tissue infection and inflammation—An update. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2020, 50, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Treglia, G. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infectious and inflammatory diseases according to published meta-analyses. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2019, 2019, 3018349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hess, S.; Alavi, A.; Basu, S. PET-Based personalized management of infectious and inflammatory disorders. PET Clin. 2016, 11, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Glaudemans, A.W.; de Vries, E.F.; Galli, F.; Dierckx, R.A.; Slart, R.H.; Signore, A. The use of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of inflammatory and infectious diseases. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2013, 2013, 623036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Descamps, L.; Olagne, L.; Merlin, C.; Cachin, F.; Soubrier, M.; Mathieu, S. Utility of PET/CT in the diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, e81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jamar, F.; Buscombe, J.; Chiti, A.; Christian, P.E.; Delbeke, D.; Donohoe, K.J.; Israel, O.; Martin-Comin, J.; Signore, A. EANM/SNMMI guideline for 18F-FDG use in inflammation and infection. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Avet, J., Jr.; Granjon, D.; Prevot-Bitot, N.; Isnardi, V.; Berger, C.; Stephan, J.L.; Dubois, F. Monitoring of systemic candidiasis by 18F-FDG PET/CT. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2009, 36, 1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tedbirt, B.; Duval-Modeste, A.B.; Courville, P.; Dominique, S.; Vera, P.; Regaieg, H. Panniculitis in a woman with opportunistic pulmonary coinfection by Pneumocystis jirovecii and Cryptococcus neoformans: 18F-FDG PET/CT revealing the infection and assessing treatment response. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2021, 46, e210–e211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Karunanithi, S.; Kumar, G.; Sharma, S.K.; Jain, D.; Gupta, A.; Kumar, R. Staging and response of sternal histoplasmosis by 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2015, 40, 231–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miyazaki, Y.; Nawa, Y.; Nakase, K.; Kohashi, S.; Kadohisa, S.; Hiraoka, A.; Miyagawa, M.; Yasukawa, M.; Hara, M. FDG-PET can evaluate the treatment for fungal liver abscess much earlier than other imagings. Ann. Hematol. 2011, 90, 1489–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chamilos, G.; Macapinlac, H.A.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. The use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and management of invasive mould infections. Med. Mycol. 2008, 46, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Hot, A.; Maunoury, C.; Poiree, S.; Lanternier, F.; Viard, J.P.; Loulergue, P.; Coignard, H.; Bougnoux, M.E.; Suarez, F.; Rubio, M.T.; et al. Diagnostic contribution of positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose for invasive fungal infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Leroy-Freschini, B.; Treglia, G.; Argemi, X.; Bund, C.; Kessler, R.; Herbrecht, R.; Imperiale, A. 18F-FDG PET/CT for invasive fungal infection in immunocompromised patients. QJM 2018, 111, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ankrah, A.O.; Span, L.F.R.; Klein, H.C.; de Jong, P.A.; Dierckx, R.A.J.O.; Kwee, T.C.; Sathekge, M.M.; Glaudemans, A.W.M.J. Role of FDG PET/CT in monitoring treatment response in patients with invasive fungal infections. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Douglas, A.P.; Thursky, K.A.; Worth, L.J.; Drummond, E.; Hogg, A.; Hicks, R.J.; Slavin, M.A. FDG PET/CT imaging in detecting and guiding management of invasive fungal infections: A retrospective comparison to conventional CT imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ankrah, A.O.; Creemers-Schild, D.; de Keizer, B.; Klein, H.C.; Dierckx, R.A.J.O.; Kwee, T.C.; Span, L.F.R.; de Jong, P.A.; Sathekge, M.M.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M. The added value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the management of invasive fungal infections. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sharma, P.; Mukherjee, A.; Karunanithi, S.; Bal, C.; Kumar, R. Potential role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with fungal infections. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014, 203, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Padma, S.; Sreehar, S. 18F FDG PET/CT identifies unsuspected bilateral adrenal histoplasmosis in an elderly immuno compromised patient. Indian J. Med. Res. 2014, 139, 786–787. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kasaliwal, R.; Malhotra, G.; Bukan, A.; Asopa, R.V.; Wanjare, S.; Shah, N.S. 18F-FDG PET as a monitoring tool to assess treatment response in bilateral adrenal histoplasmosis. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2014, 39, 576–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsai, Y.J.; Lin, Y.H.; Hsu, C.H.; Yeh, S.D. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the initial evaluation and monitoring of therapeutic response in bilateral adrenal histoplasmosis. Clin. Imaging 2013, 37, 791–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hernández-Chávez, M.J.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Niño-Vega, G.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Fungal strategies to evade the host immune recognition. Fungi 2017, 3, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kramer, J.; Özkaya, Ö.; Kümmerli, R. Bacterial siderophores in community and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Winkelmann, G. Ecology of siderophores with special reference to the fungi. Biometals 2007, 20, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ahmed, E.; Holmström, S.J. Siderophores in environmental research: Roles and applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 2014, 7, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Misslinger, M.; Hortschansky, P.; Brakhage, A.A.; Haas, H. Fungal iron homeostasis with a focus on Aspergillus fumigatus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell. Res. 2021, 1868, 118885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gunzer, M.; Thornton, C.R.; Beziere, N. Advances in the in vivo molecular imaging of invasive Aspergillosis. Fungi 2020, 6, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Haas, H. Fungal siderophore metabolism with a focus on Aspergillus fumigatus. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1266–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Petrik, M.; Zhai, C.; Haas, H.; Decristoforo, C. Siderophores for molecular imaging applications. Clin. Transl. Imaging 2017, 5, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Pfister, J.; Summer, D.; Petrik, M.; Khoylou, M.; Lichius, A.; Kaeopookum, P.; Kochinke, L.; Orasch, T.; Haas, H.; Decristoforo, C. Hybrid imaging of Aspergillus fumigatus pulmonary infection with fluorescent, 68Ga-Labelled siderophores. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Waterhouse, N.N.; Amor-Coarasa, A.; Nikolopoulou, A.; Babich, J.W. Otto: A 4.04 GBq (109 mCi) 68Ge/68Ga generator, first of its kind—Extended quality control and performance evaluation in the clinical production of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 2020, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Petrik, M.; Pfister, J.; Misslinger, M.; Decristoforo, C.; Haas, H. Siderophore-Based molecular imaging of fungal and bacterial infections-current status and future perspectives. Fungi 2020, 6, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Carrow, E.W.; Hector, R.F.; Domer, J.E. Immunodeficient CBA/N mice respond effectively to Candida albicans. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1984, 33, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Monga, D.P.; Kumar, R.; Mohapatra, L.N.; Malaviya, A.N. Experimental cryptococcosis in normal and B-cell-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 1979, 26, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Szymczak, W.A.; Davis, M.J.; Lundy, S.K.; Dufaud, C.; Olszewski, M.; Pirofski, L.A. X-Linked immunodeficient mice exhibit enhanced susceptibility to Cryptococcus neoformans infection. mBio 2013, 4, e00265-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Rapaka, R.R.; Ricks, D.M.; Alcorn, J.F.; Chen, K.; Khader, S.A.; Zheng, M.; Plevy, S.; Bengtén, E.; Kolls, J.K. Conserved natural IgM antibodies mediate innate and adaptive immunity against the opportunistic fungus Pneumocystis murina. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 2907–2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nosanchuk, J.D.; Steenbergen, J.N.; Shi, L.; Deepe, G.S., Jr.; Casadevall, A. Antibodies to a cell surface histone-like protein protect against Histoplasma capsulatum. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 112, 1164–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. De Górgolas, M.; Erice, A.; Gil, A.; Gutiérrez, J.; Rivas, P.; Hernando, C.; Rodríguez, M.C. Cryptococcal meningitis in a patient with X-linked hyper-IgM1 syndrome. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 37, 526–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wei, W.; Rosenkrans, Z.T.; Liu, J.; Huang, G.; Luo, Q.Y.; Cai, W. ImmunoPET: Concept, design, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 3787–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rolle, A.M.; Hasenberg, M.; Thornton, C.R.; Solouk-Saran, D.; Männ, L.; Weski, J.; Maurer, A.; Fischer, E.; Spycher, P.R.; Schibli, R.; et al. ImmunoPET/MR imaging allows specific detection of Aspergillus fumigatus lung infection in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E1026–E1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Xie, Q.; Zhu, H.; Wang, F.; Meng, X.; Ren, Q.; Xia, C.; Yang, Z. Establishing reliable Cu-64 production process: From target plating to molecular specific tumor micro-PET imaging. Molecules 2017, 22, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Henneberg, S.; Hasenberg, A.; Maurer, A.; Neumann, F.; Bornemann, L.; Gonzalez-Menendez, I.; Kraus, A.; Hasenberg, M.; Thornton, C.R.; Pichler, B.J.; et al. Antibody-Guided in vivo imaging of Aspergillus fumigatus lung infections during antifungal azole treatment. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Davies, G.; Rolle, A.M.; Maurer, A.; Spycher, P.R.; Schillinger, C.; Solouk-Saran, D.; Hasenberg, M.; Weski, J.; Fonslet, J.; Dubois, A.; et al. Towards translational ImmunoPET/MR imaging of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: The humanised monoclonal antibody JF5 detects Aspergillus lung infections in vivo. Theranostics 2017, 7, 3398–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Thornton, C.R. Molecular imaging of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis using ImmunoPET/MRI: The future looks bright. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Livni, E.; Fischman, A.J.; Ray, S.; Sinclair, I.; Elmaleh, D.R.; Alpert, N.M.; Weiss, S.; Correia, J.A.; Webb, D.; Dahl, R.; et al. Synthesis of 18F-labeled fluconazole and positron emission tomography studies in rabbits. Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. B 1992, 19, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fischman, A.J.; Alpert, N.M.; Livni, E.; Ray, S.; Sinclair, I.; Elmaleh, D.R.; Weiss, S.; Correia, J.A.; Webb, D.; Liss, R.; et al. Pharmacokinetics of 18F-labeled fluconazole in rabbits with candidal infections studied with positron emission tomography. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1991, 259, 1351–1359. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Kumar, V. Radiolabeled white blood cells and direct targeting of micro-organisms for infection imaging. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2005, 49, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Page, L.; Ullmann, A.J.; Schadt, F.; Wurster, S.; Samnick, S. In vitro evaluation of radiolabeled amphotericin B for molecular imaging of mold infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e02377-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, T.; Chen, Y. Research progress of [68Ga]Citrate PET’s utility in infection and inflammation imaging: A review. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2020, 22, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vorster, M.; Buscombe, J.; Saad, Z.; Sathekge, M. Past and future of Ga-citrate for infection and inflammation imaging. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Giraudo, C.; Evangelista, L.; Fraia, A.S.; Lupi, A.; Quaia, E.; Cecchin, D.; Casali, M. Molecular imaging of pulmonary inflammation and infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Ankrah, A.O.; Lawal, I.O.; Boshomane, T.M.G.; Klein, H.C.; Ebenhan, T.; Dierckx, R.A.J.O.; Vorster, M.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Sathekge, M.M. Comparison of Fluorine(18)-fluorodeoxyglucose and Gallium(68)-citrate PET/CT in patients with tuberculosis. Nuklearmedizin 2019, 58, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Aro, E.; Seppänen, M.; Mäkelä, K.T.; Luoto, P.; Roivainen, A.; Aro, H.T. PET/CT to detect adverse reactions to metal debris in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: An exploratory prospective study. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 2018, 38, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Tseng, J.R.; Chang, Y.H.; Yang, L.Y.; Wu, C.T.; Chen, S.Y.; Wan, C.H.; Hsiao, I.T.; Yen, T.C. Potential usefulness of 68Ga-citrate PET/CT in detecting infected lower limb prostheses. EJNMMI Res. 2019, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Salmanoglu, E.; Kim, S.; Thakur, M.L. Currently available radiopharmaceuticals for imaging infection and the holy grail. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2018, 48, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Signore, A.; Jamar, F.; Israel, O.; Buscombe, J.; Martin-Comin, J.; Lazzeri, E. Clinical indications, image acquisition and data interpretation for white blood cells and anti-granulocyte monoclonal antibody scintigraphy: An EANM procedural guideline. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 45, 1816–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. De Vries, E.F.; Roca, M.; Jamar, F.; Israel, O.; Signore, A. Guidelines for the labelling of leucocytes with (99m)Tc-HMPAO. Inflammation/Infection taskgroup of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2010, 37, 842–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Meyer, M.; Testart, N.; Jreige, M.; Kamani, C.; Moshebah, M.; Muoio, B.; Nicod-Lalonde, M.; Schaefer, N.; Giovanella, L.; Prior, J.O.; et al. Diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT using 18F-FDG labeled white blood cells in infectious diseases: A systematic review and a bivariate meta-analysis. Diagnostics 2019, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lawal, I.; Zeevaart, J.; Ebenhan, T.; Ankrah, A.; Vorster, M.; Kruger, H.G.; Govender, T.; Sathekge, M. Metabolic imaging of infection. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 1727–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rangger, C.; Novy, Z.; Svajger, U.; Gmeiner, T.; Decristoforo, C. On-Cartridge preparation and evaluation of 68Ga-, 89Zr- and 64Cu-precursors for cell radiolabelling. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2019, 71, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bhargava, K.K.; Gupta, R.K.; Nichols, K.J.; Palestro, C.J. In vitro human leukocyte labeling with (64)Cu: An intraindividual comparison with (111)In-oxine and (18)F-FDG. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2009, 36, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Ankrah, A.O.; Klein, H.C.; Elsinga, P.H. New imaging tracers for the infected diabetic foot (nuclear and optical imaging). Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 1287–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Miñana, E.; Roldán, M.; Chivato, T.; Martínez, T.; Fuente, T. Quantification of the chromosomal radiation damage induced by labelling of leukocytes with [18F]FDG. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2015, 42, 720–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ebenhan, T.; Sathekge, M.M.; Lengana, T.; Koole, M.; Gheysens, O.; Govender, T.; Zeevaart, J.R. 68Ga-NOTA-Functionalized ubiquicidin: Cytotoxicity, biodistribution, radiation dosimetry, and first-in-human PET/CT imaging of infections. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Bhatt, J.; Mukherjee, A.; Korde, A.; Kumar, M.; Sarma, H.D.; Dash, A. Radiolabeling and preliminary evaluation of Ga-68 labeled NODAGA-Ubiquicidin fragments for prospective infection imaging. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2017, 19, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Spanoudaki, V.C.; Ziegler, S.I. PET & SPECT instrumentation. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2008, 53–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Haseman, M.K.; Blake, K.; McDougall, I.R. Indium 111 WBC scan in local and systemic fungal infections. Arch. Intern. Med. 1984, 144, 1462–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Erba, P.A.; Israel, O. SPECT/CT in infection and inflammation. Clin. Transl. Imaging 2014, 2, 519–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Gratz, S.; Behr, T.; Herrmann, A.; Dresing, K.; Tarditi, L.; Franceschini, R.; Rhodes, B.; Stürmer, K.M.; Becker, W. Intraindividual comparison of 99mTc-labelled anti-SSEA-1 antigranulocyte antibody and 99mTc-HMPAO labelled white blood cells for the imaging of infection. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1998, 25, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kipper, S.L.; Rypins, E.B.; Evans, D.G.; Thakur, M.L.; Smith, T.D.; Rhodes, B. Neutrophil-Specific 99mTc-labeled anti-CD15 monoclonal antibody imaging for diagnosis of equivocal appendicitis. J. Nucl. Med. 2000, 41, 449–455. [Google Scholar]
  81. Becker, W.; Goldenberg, D.M.; Wolf, F. The use of monoclonal antibodies and antibody fragments in the imaging of infectious lesions. Semin. Nucl. Med. 1994, 24, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Becker, W.; Palestro, C.J.; Winship, J.; Feld, T.; Pinsky, C.M.; Wolf, F.; Goldenberg, D.M. Rapid imaging of infections with a monoclonal antibody fragment (LeukoScan). Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1996, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Becker, W.; Bair, J.; Behr, T.; Repp, R.; Streckenbach, H.; Beck, H.; Gramatzki, M.; Winship, M.J.; Goldenberg, D.M.; Wolf, F. Detection of soft-tissue infections and osteomyelitis using a technetium-99m-labeled anti-granulocyte monoclonal antibody fragment. J. Nucl. Med. 1994, 35, 1436–1443. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Prvulovich, E.M.; Miller, R.F.; Costa, D.C.; Severn, A.; Corbett, E.; Bomanji, J.; Becker, W.S.; Ell, P.J. Immunoscintigraphy with a 99Tcm-labelled anti-granulocyte monoclonal antibody in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and AIDS. Nucl. Med. Commun. 1995, 16, 838–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Buscombe, J.R.; Oyen, W.J.; Corstens, F.H.; Ell, P.J.; Miller, R.F. Localization of infection in HIV antibody positive patients with fever. Comparison of the efficacy of Ga-67 citrate and radiolabeled human IgG. Clin. Nucl. Med. 1995, 20, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Rosso, J.; Guillon, J.M.; Parrot, A.; Denis, M.; Akoun, G.; Mayaud, C.; Scherrer, M.; Meignan, M. Technetium-99m-DTPA aerosol and gallium-67 scanning in pulmonary complications of human immunodeficiency virus infection. J. Nucl. Med. 1992, 33, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Parker, K.M.; Nicholson, J.K.; Cezayirli, R.C.; Biggs, P.J. Aspergillosis of the sphenoid sinus: Presentation as a pituitary mass and postoperative gallium-67 imaging. Surg. Neurol. 1996, 45, 354–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lupetti, A.; Welling, M.; Mazzi, U.; Nibbering, P.H.; Pauwels, E.K. Technetium-99m labelled fluconazole and antimicrobial peptides for imaging of Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus infections. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2002, 29, 674–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Welling, M.M.; Lupetti, A.; Balter, H.S.; Lanzzeri, S.; Souto, B.; Rey, A.M.; Savio, E.O.; Paulusma-Annema, A.; Pauwels, E.K.; Nibbering, P.H. 99mTc-labeled antimicrobial peptides for detection of bacterial and Candida albicans infections. J. Nucl. Med. 2001, 42, 788–794. [Google Scholar]
  90. Lupetti, A.; Welling, M.M.; Pauwels, E.K.; Nibbering, P.H. Radiolabelled antimicrobial peptides for infection detection. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003, 3, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Akhtar, M.S.; Imran, M.B.; Nadeem, M.A.; Shahid, A. Antimicrobial peptides as infection imaging agents: Better than radiolabeled antibiotics. Int. J. Pept. 2012, 965238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Welling, M.M.; Mongera, S.; Lupetti, A.; Balter, H.S.; Bonetto, V.; Mazz, U.; Pauwels, E.K.; Nibbering, P.H. Radiochemical and biological characteristics of 99mTc-UBI 29-41 for imaging of bacterial infections. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2002, 29, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Da Silva, C.A.; Chalouni, C.; Williams, A.; Hartl, D.; Lee, C.G.; Elias, J.A. Chitin is a size-dependent regulator of macrophage TNF and IL-10 production. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 3573–3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Siaens, R.; Eijsink, V.G.; Dierckx, R.; Slegers, G. (123)I-Labeled chitinase as specific radioligand for in vivo detection of fungal infections in mice. J. Nucl. Med. 2004, 45, 1209–1216. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Siaens, R.; Eijsink, V.G.; Vaaje-Kolstad, G.; Vandenbulcke, K.; Cornelissen, B.; Cuvelier, C.; Dierckx, R.; Slegers, G. Synthesis and evaluation of a 99mTechnetium labeled chitin-binding protein as potential specific radioligand for the detection of fungal infections in mice. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2006, 50, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Walker, R.C.; Jones-Jackson, L.B.; Martin, W.; Habibian, M.R.; Delbeke, D. New imaging tools for the diagnosis of infection. Future Microbiol. 2007, 2, 527–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Helal, M.; Dadachova, E. Radioimmunotherapy as a novel approach in HIV, bacterial, and fungal infectious diseases. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2018, 33, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hindorf, C.; Glatting, G.; Chiesa, C.; Lindén, O.; Flux, G.; EANM Dosimetry Committee. EANM Dosimetry Committee guidelines for bone marrow and whole-body dosimetry. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2010, 37, 1238–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Shah, M.; Garg, G.; Dadachova, E. Preclinical testing of radiopharmaceuticals for novel applications in HIV, bacterial and fungal infectious diseases. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 59, 317–326. [Google Scholar]
  100. Dadachova, E.; Casadevall, A. Radiolabeled antibodies for therapy of infectious diseases. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014, 2, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Bryan, R.A.; Guimaraes, A.J.; Hopcraft, S.; Jiang, Z.; Bonilla, K.; Morgenstern, A.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Del Poeta, M.; Torosantucci, A.; Cassone, A.; et al. Toward developing a universal treatment for fungal disease using radioimmunotherapy targeting common fungal antigens. Mycopathologia 2012, 173, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Dadachova, E.; Casadevall, A. Radioimmunotherapy of infectious diseases. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2009, 39, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Dadachova, E.; Bryan, R.A.; Apostolidis, C.; Morgenstern, A.; Zhang, T.; Moadel, T.; Torres, M.; Huang, X.; Revskaya, E.; Casadevall, A. Interaction of radiolabeled antibodies with fungal cells and components of the immune system in vitro and during radioimmunotherapy for experimental fungal infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 193, 1427–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lawal, I.; Ankrah, A.; Sathekge, M. Reply: Molecular imaging of bacteria in patients is an attractive fata morgana, not a realistic option. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 07 00407 g001 550
Figure 1. Patient with pulmonary cryptococcosis (blue arrow) with bilateral intense hypermetabolic uptake on coronal slice of 18F-FDG PET due to adrenal involvement (red arrow).
Figure 1. Patient with pulmonary cryptococcosis (blue arrow) with bilateral intense hypermetabolic uptake on coronal slice of 18F-FDG PET due to adrenal involvement (red arrow).
Jof 07 00407 g001
Table
Table 1. Tracers used in imaging fungal infection and whether they have been translated to humans.
Table 1. Tracers used in imaging fungal infection and whether they have been translated to humans.
Tracer [Ref]PET or SPECT ImagingLabelUsed in HumansAspect of Host Response
FDG [23,24,25,26,27]PET18FYesGlucose utilisation for energy-dependent processes of inflammation
White blood cells
[65,66,67,68,69,70,71]		Both18F, 64Cu, 111In, 99mTcYesMigration of white blood cells to the site of infection
Monoclonal anti-granulocytes [76,77,78]SPECT99mTcYesMigration to white blood cells
Antimicrobial peptides
[74,75,86,90,91,92]		Both99mTc, 68GaYesThe cationic peptide reacts with the negative charge on the fungi membrane. Release by cells to kill fungi
Siderophores [39,40]SPECT68Ga, 89ZrNoTraps iron for fungi to overcome host nutritional immunity
Monoclonal antibodies against fungiPET64Cu, 89ZrNoAgainst an antigen JF5 in Aspergillus fumigatus
Chitin proteins
[92,93]		SPECT123I, 99mTcNoChitin has different effect on host response depending on the size
Fluconazole
[57,86,87]		Both99mTc, 68GaNoAnti-fungal used to combat fungi when host defence fails. Affects ergosterol biosynthesis
Amphotericin
[58]		Both99mTc, 68GaNoAnti-fungal-irreversible bind to ergosterol
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ankrah, A.O.; Sathekge, M.M.; Dierckx, R.A.J.O.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M. Radionuclide Imaging of Fungal Infections and Correlation with the Host Defense Response. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060407

AMA Style

Ankrah AO, Sathekge MM, Dierckx RAJO, Glaudemans AWJM. Radionuclide Imaging of Fungal Infections and Correlation with the Host Defense Response. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(6):407. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060407

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ankrah, Alfred O., Mike M. Sathekge, Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx, and Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans. 2021. "Radionuclide Imaging of Fungal Infections and Correlation with the Host Defense Response" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 6: 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7060407

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop