You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Journal of Fungi
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open Access

1 January 2026

Integrative Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of White-Rot Fungi Ganoderma tsugae Growing on Both Coniferous and Broad-Leaved Trees

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
State Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Xinjiang Production and Construction Group Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Enhancement and Gene Resources Utilization, Biotechnology Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi 832000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi2026, 12(1), 35;https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010035 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Metabolomics and Genomics, 2nd Edition
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

Ganoderma tsugae is a typical white-rot fungus capable of decaying both coniferous and broad-leaved trees and is also used in traditional Chinese medicine for its immunomodulatory and anticancer properties. To elucidate the molecular basis of its broad substrate adaptability, we performed integrated genomic and transcriptomic analyses of two G. tsugae strains (collected from Xingjiang on Betula and Jilin on Larix). The high-quality genomes of G. tsugae Wu 2022 from Xinjiang (40.8 Mb, 12,496 genes) and G. tsugae Cui 14110 from Jilin (45.6 Mb, 13,450 genes) were obtained. There are enriched gene families related to carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) in two G. tsugae strains. Notably, specific CAZyme families implicated in hemicellulose (GH16), chitin metabolism (GH18), and ester bond cleavage (CE10) were prominently expanded. Transcriptome analyses under the induction of Betula and Larix sawdust revealed a core adaptive response. A total of 5558 genes were differentially expressed, including 2094 up-regulated and 3464 down-regulated genes. Most differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were annotated as “catalytic activity”, “metabolic processes” and specific functions such as nutrient transport (“MFS transporter”), and lipid metabolism (“3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier protein] reductase”). In addition, a conserved suite of the eleven shared DEGs were annotated as “Heat shock protein 9/12”, “alcohol dehydrogenase”, and “Cytochrome p450” related to secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism. Based on the annotation results, the wood degradation mechanism of G. tsugae can be described as synthesizing and secreting degradation enzyme system to obtain energy, using protective enzyme systems to ensure its own health, and employing a transport enzyme system to recycle metabolic capacity. This progress ensures the environmental adaptability and high degradation efficiency of G. tsugae during wood degradation.

1. Introduction

Ganoderma P. Karst. (Polyporales, Ganodermataceae) comprises a group of white-rot fungi possessing lignocellulose-degrading capabilities [1], primarily mediated by an array of secreted enzymes including laccases, peroxidases, and dehydrogenases. The enzymatic machineries and underlying genetic basis of lignin degradation have been particularly well-characterized in models like Phanerochaete chrysosporium Burds., as well as in several Ganoderma species, revealing complex systems which involve numerous carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) [2,3,4], sugar metabolism pathways [5], and the overall degradation mechanisms [6]. The exploitation of these fungal systems extends beyond fundamental ecology into applied biotechnologies, including the bioremediation of aromatic pollutants [7,8,9], and the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass [8,10], underscoring their catalytic versatility. Ganoderma tsugae Murrill is not only a precious medicinal fungus in traditional Chinese medicine, with polysaccharides and triterpenoids valued for their immunomodulatory, antitumor, and anti-aging properties [11], but also a noteworthy model for studying substrate adaptability that could grow on both coniferous trees and broad-leaved trees [12]. It can cause white rot on Tsuga, Larix, and Betula in Northeast China and North America, posing a significant pathological threat [13] that suggests a robust and flexible degradative apparatus. Despite its dual importance in medicine and ecology, the specific genetic regulatory networks enabling G. tsugae’s broad host range wood decay remain largely unexplored. A preliminary assembly of G. tsugae (strain CCMJ4178, 43.26 Mb) provided a first appearance, identifying several genes (e.g., salh, phea, cyp53a1, cyp102a, glpk, and amie) potentially involved in plant–pathogen interaction, benzoate degradation, and fanconi anemia pathway [14].
Multi-omics approaches have been extensively applied to elucidate the lignocellulose-degradation mechanisms and secondary metabolism in white-rot fungi, including other Ganoderma species. The whole-genome sequencing and transcriptome analysis of G. lucidum (Curtis) P. Karst. have been conducted not only to investigate polysaccharide production under the influence of the reagent Tween 80, but also to identify a repertoire of genes encoding key lignin-modifying enzymes such as laccases and peroxidases [15]. Similarly, a systematic multi-omics study of G. lingzhi Sheng H. Wu, Y. Cao & Y.C. Dai identified over 500 carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes) and genes involved in recognition and biosynthesis of ganoderic acids, and a new special ganoderic acid A was also discovered [16]. Beyond the Ganoderma genus, integrated multi-omics frameworks such as genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics have been successfully employed in wood decay fungi like Phanerochaete chrysosporium Burds., Postia placenta (Fr.) M.J. Larsen & Lombard, and Wolfiporia cocos (F.A. Wolf) Ryvarden & Gilb. to dissect the temporal regulation and synergistic action of complex enzyme systems during wood decay according to the different degradation strategies [17,18,19]. Additionally, CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing and multi-omics integration (e.g., genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics) have been implemented in G. lucidum to optimize the production of bioactive compounds and to characterize gene networks underlying developmental processes [20,21]. Nevertheless, the genetic determinants of host-specific adaptation and wood degradation in G. tsugae have not been systematically explored using such approaches.
In this study, Illumina NovaSeq and PacBio sequencing technologies were used to sequence the high-quality genomes of two Ganoderma tsugae strains collected from Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region growing on Betula and Jilin Province growing on Larix. Based on the different culture media with Betula and Larix sawdust, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the two G. tsugae strains were identified with transcriptomic analyses and completed the functional annotation using key function database. We will supplement comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic data for G. tsugae, explore the genetic characteristics of wood decomposition, and provide a molecular foundation for enhancing the efficiency of lignocellulose biodegradation and utilization. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying the efficient lignocellulose degradation by G tsugae. Our findings will facilitate future research into the mechanistic basis of its degradation and utilization efficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains and Culture Conditions

The experimental strains were isolated directly from fruiting bodies directly, in which the fruiting body of Ganoderma tsugae Wu 2022 was collected from Altay (47°50′ N, 88°39′ E), Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Northwest China, growing on Betula, while the fruiting body of G. tsugae Cui 14110 was collected from Lushuihe National Forest Park in Baishan (42°32′ N, 127°59′ E), Jilin Province, Northeast China, growing on Larix. They are deposited at the Institute of Microbiology, Beijing Forestry University, and are available upon request. The strains were preliminarily cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium in the dark at 25 °C for 7 days. Then, the genome sequencing was conducted on the mycelia of strains Wu 2022 and Cui 14110, which were cultured in liquid medium (malt extract medium, 2% malt powder, 1% glucose, and 0.3% KH2PO4) for 10 days at 25 °C in darkness. The mycelia were then collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.
Transcriptome sequencing was conducted on the mycelia growing on three carbon sources designated as Betula sawdust (B), Larix sawdust (L), and glucose (C). Glucose was used as a controlled experiment (following the liquid culture method as mentioned above). For the sawdust substrates media, 5 g of two kinds of wood sawdust in 40–60 mesh were placed in 125 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, respectively, to which 12.5 mL of deionized water was added. Then, 5 mL of mycelia homogenate was inoculated in each flask and cultured for 7 days at 25 °C. Each variable was repeated in triplicate to serve as parallel controls. The wood sawdust and Erlenmeyer flasks were sterilized by high-pressure steam and the inoculation and cultivation were carried out in a sterile environment.

2.2. Genome Sequencing, Assembly, and Annotation

The genomes of the two strains were de novo sequenced using high-throughput Illumina NovaSeq and PacBio sequencing platforms at Shanghai Personalbio Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The standard Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA LT library preparation protocol (Illumina TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation Guide) and the TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) were employed to construct genomic libraries for next-generation sequencing. The standard PacBio Template Preparation Kit 1.0 library preparation protocol (utilizing BluePippin for the selection of 20 kb templates) and the SMRTbell Template Preparation Kit 1.0 (Pacific Biosciences, California, USA) were utilized to create genomic libraries for third-generation sequencing. Prior to sequencing, library quality was assessed using the Agilent High Sensitivity DNA Kit on an Agilent Bioanalyzer. Following quality assessment, quantification of the libraries was carried out using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher, Massachusetts, USA) on the Promega QuantiFluor fluorometric quantification system. To ensure the quality of subsequent data analyses, further filtration of the downstream data was conducted. Flye (https://github.com/fenderglass/Flye, accessed on 25 December 2025) and NextDenovo (https://github.com/Nextomics/NextDenovo, accessed on 25 December 2025) were used to perform de novo assembly of filtered reads to construct contigs and scaffolds, and the resulting assemblies were corrected in Pilon v.1.18 [22] to obtain the final genome sequence. Finally, BUSCO v.5.4.5 was used to assess the integrity of genome assembly [23].
The de novo prediction of genetic models, near-exotic species homology prediction, and transcriptome data-aided annotation methods were jointly used for the prediction of protein-coding genes [16]. Augustus v.2.5.5, glimmerHMM v.3.0.4, and GeneMark-ES v.4.71 were used for de novo prediction [24,25,26]. Exonerate v.2.20 was used for near-exotic species homology prediction. PASA v.2.4.1 was used to align transcripts to genomes for the structural annotation of genes. The sequence alignment of protein-coding genes was performed using DIAMOND v.2.0.14 [27]. The database utilized for the sequence alignment was the NCBI NR database v.4 (Non-Redundant Protein Sequence Database, http://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/blast/db/, accessed on 25 December 2025). A significance threshold of 1e-6 was chosen for the sequence alignment, and the best hit was selected for functional annotation. The functional annotation of protein-coding genes was performed by utilizing BLAST v.2.5.0 [28] to compare against databases such as Non-redundant (NR) v.2017.10.10, Gene Ontology (GO) v.2023-01-01, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Evolutionary Genealogy of Genes: Non-supervised Orthologous Groups (EggNOG). The GO annotation of protein-coding genes was achieved using Blast2go software (https://www.biobam.com/blast2go/, accessed on 25 December 2025) [29] referencing GO database v.105.1. The EggNOG annotation was performed using EggNOG-mapper v.2 [30], with the diamond alignment tool referencing the EggNOG database v.6.0 and a significance threshold set at 1 × 10−6. The primary objectives of KEGG annotation comprise the following two aspects: KO (KEGG Ortholog) annotation and KEGG v.105.1 Pathway annotation, which are primarily accomplished using KEGG Automatic Annotation System (KAAS) (https://www.genome.jp/kaas-bin/kaas_main, accessed on 25 December 2025) [31]. Furthermore, protein-coding genes were also annotated by blasting against Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes database (CAZy) v.2023, and hmmscan v.4.1 was used to predict the genes related to CAZymes in the genome sequence.

2.3. Transcriptome Sequencing and Annotation

Transcriptome sequencing for 18 mycelia samples was conducted on the Illumina NovaSeq sequencing platform by Shangh ai Personalbio Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and performed using G. tsugae CCMJ4178 (available in BioProject PRJNA733861, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCA_024305745.1/, accessed on 25 December 2025)) as reference genome-based read mapping. Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, CA, USA) following manufacturer’s protocol, then the concentration, quality, and integrity were determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA). Clean reads were obtained after quality control using FASTQ v.0.22.0 [32]. The clean reads were then compared with a reference genome using HISAT2 v.2.1.0 (https://daehwankimlab.github.io/hisat2/, accessed on 25 December 2025) and used Trinity v.2.11.0 (https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq/issues/1131, accessed on 25 December 2025) for transcriptome assembly. Fragments Per Kilo bases per Million fragments (FPKM) was used to normalize the qualification of the expression levels. Based on FPKM expression data, the differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 v.1.38.3 R package [33]. Genes with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 and |log2(fold change)| > 2 were defined as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). DEGs were functionally annotated based on the GO v.2023-01-01, KEGG v.105.1, clusters of orthologous groups for eukaryotic complete genomes (KOG) database, and pathogen–host interactions (PHI) database.

3. Results

3.1. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Assembly

The genome information of Ganoderma tsugae Wu 2022 and G. tsugae Cui 14110 is shown in Table 1. The 1134 and 660 contigs were assembled into 1099 and 270 scaffolds forming 40.8 Mb genome and 45.6 Mb genome, with GC contents of 56.03% and 55.85% for G. tsugae Wu 2022 and G. tsugae Cui 14110, respectively. A total of 12,496 protein-coding genes were predicted in G. tsugae Wu 2022, with an average length about 1772 bp, and a total of 13,450 protein-coding genes were predicted in G. tsugae Cui 14110, with an average length of 1702 bp. The average exons per gene were 5.6 and 5.2 for the two strains, respectively. In addition, Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Ortholog (BUSCO) assessment showed high completeness, with scores of 98.5% for G. tsugae Wu 2022 and 98.1% for G. tsugae Cui 14110, confirming high quality of the genome sequences for two strains in this study (Table 1).
Table 1. Genome information of two strains of Ganoderma tsugae.

3.2. Genome Functional Annotation

Protein-coding genes predicted in Ganoderma tsugae Wu 2022 and G. tsugae Cui 14110 were conducted to sequence similarity analysis against five databases to predict their potential functions. In general, the annotation profiles of the two strains were highly consistent, with no significant differences (Table 2). The annotation of NR database showed that 12,220 genes (97.8%) were annotated in G. tsugae Wu 2022 and 13,281 genes (98.7%) were annotated in G. tsugae Cui 14110. More than 90% of the genes in the two strains were matched with Ganoderma species (Supplementary Table S1). Through EggNOG database, most genes obtained annotation of “S: Function unknown” (3749 genes in G. tsugae Wu 2022 and 4007 genes in G. tsugae Cui 14110), and the subsequent frequent categories were “O: Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones” (609 genes in G. tsugae Wu 2022 and 620 genes in G. tsugae Cui 14110) and “G: Carbohydrate transport and metabolism” (561 genes in G. tsugae Wu 2022 and 596 genes in G. tsugae Cui 14110) (Supplementary Table S2).
Table 2. Functional annotation of predicted genes in two Ganoderma tsugae strains based on five databases.
In the GO database, a total of 6616 genes (52.9%) in G. tsugae Wu 2022 and 7176 genes (53.4%) in G. tsugae Cui 14110 were matched into three functional classes with similar categories (Figure 1, Supplementary Table S3). In G. tsugae Wu 2022, most genes were annotated in the “biological process” category, i.e., biological processes (5908), cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process (1706), and biosynthetic processes (1458); cell (2599), intracellular (2491), and organelle (1942) in the “cell component” category; molecular function (5620), ion binding (2563), and oxidoreductase activity (1005) in the “molecular function” category (Figure 1A). Compared to G. tsugae Wu 2022, the GO enrichment analysis of G. tsugae Cui 14110 showed high consistency across categories with only differences in quantity (Figure 1B).
Figure 1. Functional annotation of predicted genes in two Ganoderma tsugae strains based on GO database. (A) G. tsugae Wu 2022. (B) G. tsugae Cui 14110. The different colors represent three function classes involving the related categories.
In the KEGG database, a total of 3685 genes (29.4%) and 3824 genes (28.4%) were annotated, respectively (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S4). The predicted genes in the two strains were enriched in eight classes, i.e., Brite Hierarchies, Cellular Processes, Environmental Information Processing, Genetic Information Processing, Human Diseases, Metabolism, Not Included in Pathway or Brite, and Organismal Systems. The categories annotated in the two strains were highly consistent, with only quantitative differences. Among these categories, “Protein families: genetic information processing” in Brite Hierarchies had the highest number of genes (2389 genes in G. tsugae Wu 2022 and 2409 genes in G. tsugae Cui 14110). All other categories contained no more than 700 genes each, which together accounted for approximately 35%–37% of the total KEGG-annotated genes in each strain (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Functional annotation of predicted genes in two Ganoderma tsugae strains based on KEGG database. (A) G. tsugae Wu 2022. (B) G. tsugae Cui 14110. The different colors represent eight function classes involving the related categories.
A total of 572 gene families in G. tsugae Wu 2022 and 582 gene families in G. tsugae Cui 14110 were defined in the CAZymes (Figure 3, Supplementary Table S5). Notably, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the quantity among six CAZymes classes. The gene families related to glycoside hydrolases (GHs) were most abundant in both strains (257 gene families in G. tsugae Wu 2022 and 265 gene families in G. tsugae Cui 14110), followed by auxiliary activities (AAs), carbohydrate esterases (CEs), glycosyl transferases (GTs), carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs), and polysaccharide lyases (PLs). Both strains showed peak annotation in the CE10 (42, 39), GH16 (32, 35), and GH18 (35, 34).
Figure 3. Functional annotation of predicted genes in two Ganoderma tsugae strains based on CAZymes database. GTs: glycosyl transferase; PLs: polysaccharide lyase; CEs: carbohydrate esterase; AAs: auxiliary activity; CBMs: carbohydrate-binding module; and GHs: glycoside hydrolase. The annotation results of G. tsugae Wu 2022 were in green, and those of G. tsugae Cui 14110 were in blue. The number of gene families for each class is shown above the plot.

3.3. Transcriptome Sequencing of G. Tsugae Cultured on Different Substrates

RNA sequencing was performed on the mycelia growing on glucose (C), Betula sawdust (B), and Larix sawdust (L). The mycelia of eighteen experimental samples for the two strains were collected for RNA-seq. After quality control, the clean reads against the reference genome ranged from 36.11 to 54.82 million reads for G. tsugae Wu 2022, and 42.14 to 50.07 million reads for G. tsugae Cui 14110. The mapping ratio of G. tsugae Wu 2022 ranged from 98.16% to 98.76%, and from 98.43% to 98.76% for G. tsugae Cui 14110. The Q20 value of each sample was above 98% (Supplementary Table S6).
Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted based on the FPKM standardized data from six treatments. In the two-dimensional PCA plot, the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained 62.8% and 20.2% of the overall variance, respectively (Figure 4). It showed that six treatments formed distinct, separate clusters from each other. The glucose-grown treatments (Wu 2022_C and Cui 14110_C) showed a higher degree of intergroup dispersion compared to the other four treatments. Additionally, three experimental samples in the treatment of G. tsugae Cui 14110 growing on Larix sawdust (Cui 14110_L) exhibited higher degree of intragroup dispersion. Overall, the PCA demonstrated that the transcriptome sequencing data of six treatments was reliable for subsequent analyses.
Figure 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the FPKM standardized data of six treatments. The treatments labeled with circle and square are divided into Ganoderma tsugae Wu 2022 and G. tsugae Cui 14110 strains. The different colors represent the two strains growing on glucose medium (C), Betula sawdust (B), and Larix sawdust (L).

3.4. Differential Expressed Genes Among Six Treatments

Differential expressed genes (DEGs) were identified across the five comparisons using thresholds of |log2 Fold Change| > 2 and p-value < 0.05. A total of 5558 DEGs were found among five comparisons, including 2094 up-regulated and 3464 down-regulated genes. Among three inter-strain comparisons (Wu 2022_C vs. Cui 14110_C, Wu 2022_B vs. Cui 14110_B, and Wu 2022_L vs. Cui 14110_L), 4972 DEGs were identified, comprising 1858 up-regulated and 3114 down-regulated genes (Figure 5). In addition, there were 586 DEGs defined in two intra-strain, cross-substrate comparisons as follows: 445 DEGs in Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B and 141 DEGs in Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B, representing an approximately three-fold difference in the number of DEGs induced by substrate change between the two strains (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Number of DEGs among five comparisons. The number of up- and down-regulated genes for each category are shown above and below the plot.
The DEGs of the five comparisons were located on sixteen scaffolds of the reference genome (Ganoderma tsugae CCMJ4178), in which the length of DEGs on JAHRBS010000015.1 and JAHRBS010000016.1 were too short to show the density (Figure 6). The DEGs density of JAHRBS010000004.1 was highest accounting 9.9%, followed by JAHRBS010000009.1 (8.4%) and JAHRBS010000002.1 (8.2%). Almost no differentially expressed genes were located at JAHRBS010000011.1 (1.5%), JAHRBS010000015.1 (1.3%), and JAHRBS010000016.1 (0.4%). In addition, the trend of DEGs density in each scaffold is of no consistent pattern.
Figure 6. DEG density among five comparisons on reference genome (Ganoderma tsugae CCMJ4178). The colors from red to blue represent the number of DEGs, and the pink modules display the trend of DEG density.
The Venn diagram analysis showed 11 shared DEGs of five comparisons, and contained 333, 91, 19, 223, and 493 unique DEGs, respectively (Figure 7). Focusing on substrate effects, 300 DEGs were common to both strains when cultured on natural sawdust (L or B) compared to glucose (C). Within this set, thirty-nine genes were differentially expressed in both strains specifically when comparing the two sawdust types (L vs. B). There are 829 DEGs shared in the two strains under one kind of carbon sources designated as Betula sawdust (B), Larix sawdust (L), and glucose (C), respectively.
Figure 7. Venn diagram for shared and unique DEGs among five comparisons. The number of each module is shown on the plot.

3.5. Functional Annotation of DEGs

The functional annotation of DEGs in five comparisons was conducted based on GO and KEGG database, respectively. There are 5936 GO terms annotated in five comparisons, including 460 non-redundant terms (Supplementary Table S7), and a total of 606 KEGG pathways were annotated among five comparisons, in which 54 terms were unique (Supplementary Table S8). The top ten GO terms and twenty KEGG pathways were shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9.
Figure 8. GO enrichment analyses of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among five comparisons. (A) Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B. (B) Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B. (C) Wu 2022_C vs. Cui 14110_C. (D) Wu 2022_B vs. Cui 14110_B. (E) Wu 2022_L vs. Cui 14110_L.
Figure 9. KEGG enrichment analyses of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among five comparisons. (A) Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B. (B) Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B. (C) Wu 2022_C vs. Cui 14110_C. (D) Wu 2022_B vs. Cui 14110_B. (E) Wu 2022_L vs. Cui 14110_L.
Based on GO enrichment analysis of the five comparisons (Figure 8), “catalytic activity”, “extracellular region”, and “oxidoreductase activity” were commonly enriched terms. All GO terms shown here were extremely significantly expressed (p-value < 0.00001). Most DEGs were annotated as category “catalytic activity” (GO: 0003824) in Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B (71), Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B (184), and Wu 2022_B vs. Cui 14110_B (567), while “oxidation-reduction process” (GO: 0055114) was the most annotated category in Wu 2022_C vs. Cui 14110_C (199) and Wu 2022_L vs. Cui 14110_L (172). In addition, the DEGs annotated as category “cellulose binding” (7), “dioxygenase activity” (13), “iron ion binding” (73), “extracellular region” (48), and “fungal-type cell wall” (1) were the least frequently annotated across the various comparisons.
According to the KEGG annotation results of five comparisons based on KEGG database (Figure 9), “Metabolism” was the common class annotated among five comparisons, and “Organismal Systems”, “Human Diseases”, and “Cellular Processes” also appeared in various comparisons. “Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis” was the only shared pathway in five comparisons. The annotated pathways in Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B clustered into three classes, and “Peroxisome” of “Cellular Processes” belonging to “Transport and catabolism” was unique. The most pathways annotated in each comparison were various, such as “Cyanoamino acid metabolism” belonging to “Metabolism of other amino acids”, “Starch and sucrose metabolism” belonging to “Carbohydrate metabolism”, “Lysine degradation” belonging to “Amino acid metabolism”, and “Biotin metabolism” belonging to “Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins”. The pathways grouped in “Human Diseases” were annotated in Wu 2022_B vs. Cui 14110_B and Wu 2022_L vs. Cui 14110_L, which were related to “Systemic lupus erythematosus”, “Chemical carcinogenesis”, and “Alcoholism”.
The comparisons of Wu 2022_C vs. Cui 14110_C, Wu 2022_B vs. Cui 14110_B, and Wu 2022_L vs. Cui 14110_L shared 829 DEGs, which were mostly annotated as GO: 0008152 (252, metabolic process) belonging to class “Biological Process (BP)” in GO database and K00652 (8-amino-7-oxononanoate synthase) in KEGG database. Within this shared set, 300 DEGs were common specifically to Wu 2022_B vs. Cui 14110_B and Wu 2022_L vs. Cui 14110_L, but not to Wu 2022_C vs. Cui 14110_C. These DEGs were also mostly annotated as GO: 0008152 (252, metabolic process) belonging to class “Biological Process (BP)” in GO database, and K08192 (MFS transporter, ACS family, DAL5 transporter family protein) and K00059 (3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier protein] reductase) in KEGG database (Supplementary Table S9).
The comparisons of Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B and Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B shared 39 DEGs induced by two kinds of sawdust (Supplementary Table S10). Besides GO: 0003824 (18, catalytic activity), most DEGs were enriched in the GO database as GO: 0008152 (18, metabolic process) belonging to class “Biological Process (BP)”. Three KEGG pathways were annotated, such as K17069 (O-acetylhomoserine/O-acetylserine sulfhydrylase), K01539 (sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha), and K13050 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9). PHI: 2393 (O-methylsterigmatocystin oxidoreductase) was annotated for a small number of DEGs in Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B and Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B. There were 19 unique DEGs in Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B (14 down-regulated and 5 up-regulated) and 91 DEGs in Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B (40 down-regulated and 51 up-regulated) (Supplementary Table S11). Besides the common GO: 0003824 (catalytic activity) and GO: 0008152 (metabolic process), the most common ones were GO: 0005488 (11, binding) belonging to class “Molecular Functions (MF)”, and GO: 0009987 (23, cellular process) belonging to class “Biological Process (BP)”, respectively. Two KEGG pathways were annotated as “nitrilase” and “cytochrome P450 family 13”.
The eleven DEGs shared by five comparisons were located at scaffolds JAHRBS010000001.1, JAHRBS010000002.1, JAHRBS010000003.1, JAHRBS010000004.1, JAHRBS010000006.1, JAHRBS010000009.1, JAHRBS0100000013.1, and JAHRBS0100000014.1, with gene lengths ranging from 252 to 1713 bp (Supplementary Table S12). Most DEGs were annotated as GO: 0003824 (7, catalytic activity) belonging to class “Molecular Functions (MF)”, and GO: 0008152 (7, metabolic process) belonging to class “Biological Process (BP)”. In KOG database, class “Q: Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism” was the most noticeable, which was annotated as category “Heat shock protein 9/12”, “alcohol dehydrogenase”, and “Cytochrome p450”. There were no DEGs annotated in KEGG database.

4. Discussion

Through whole-genome sequencing of the two strains of Ganoderma tsugae, we obtained a high-quality genome assembly for each strain. The strain Wu 2022 from Xinjiang has a genome size of 40.8 Mb encoding 12,496 protein-coding genes, while the strain Cui 14110 from Jilin has a genome of 45.6 Mb with 13,450 protein-coding genes (Table 1). These genome sizes and gene counts are comparable to, though slightly divergent from, a previously published G. tsugae genome (strain CCMJ4178, 18 contigs, and 10,946 protein-coding genes) [14]. The observed variations in genome size and gene content among the two strains likely reflect both natural genomic diversity between different G. tsugae isolates and technical discrepancies arising from the use of different sequencing platforms and assembly methodologies. Until now, there have been twenty-six published genomes of Ganoderma presenting sixteen species on JGI (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/fungi/fungi.info.html, accessed on 25 December 2025) and NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 25 December 2025). Reported genomes sizes for Ganoderma species range from 39 to 92 Mb, and the three genomes of G. tsugae are smaller than most species, especially the largest genome of G. adspersum CBS 147723 (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/portal/GanadsStandDraft_FD/, accessed on 25 December 2025).
According to the functional annotation of protein-coding genes from Ganoderma tsugae Wu 2022 and G. tsugae Cui 14110 across five databases, the two strains exhibit highly conserved functional profiles, with no significant differences observed in overall annotation categories (Table 2). It indicated that despite their distinct geographical origins and plant hosts, both strains retain core molecular mechanisms characteristic of G. tsugae. In NR database, G. leucocontextum was the most frequently annotated species, which always formed sister branches with G. tsugae in phylogenetic analysis [1]. The shared gene families and functional modules are also worth considering, especially the part related to conserved lignocellulolytic mechanisms. The functional profiles of G. tsugae Wu 2022 and G. tsugae Cui 14110 in the EggNOG database indicate that the related proteins are modified or pathways are activated to initiate protein synthesis and recovery through protein phosphorylation [34,35] and ubiquitination [36,37], thereby secreting carbohydrate hydrolases to degrade lignocellulose [38]. The most abundant term in GO database is “biological processes”, and the predominantly KEGG pathway is “Brite Hierarchies” concerning “Protein families: genetic information processing” (Figure 2). It implies that the proteins encoded by their genomes are involved in extremely diverse and active cellular activities [39]. Hierarchy directly points to the central law of life: DNA to RNA to protein [40]. Its enrichment means that the genome of the two G. tsugae strains has invested a significant number of resources in the expression of genetic information [41]. In addition, the two strains were also annotated multiple carbohydrate metabolism pathways, including “Starch and sucrose metabolism”, “Galactose metabolism”, “Fructose and mannose metabolism”, etc., and pathways related to protein synthesis, modification, transport, and secretion associated with hydrolase secretion (Table S4). In contrast, the difference between the two is that G. tsugae Wu 2022 may have higher protein synthesis efficiency, and G. tsugae Cui 14110 has more advantages in environmental adaptation and signal response, which may affect the secretion regulation and functional expression of its hydrolytic enzymes.
Functional annotation based on CAZymes database revealed a highly similar performance of carbohydrate-active enzymes between Ganoderma tsugae Wu 2022 and G. tsugae Cui 14110, with abundant glycoside hydrolases (GHs) (Figure 3). Cellulose and hemicellulose, the main components of wood, are both polysaccharides [42]. Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) specifically catalyze the hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds in these polysaccharide chains [43,44]. GH16 and GH18 families were enriched (Supplementary Table S5), and the xyloglucanase/TETase in the former one can cleave the main chain of xyloglucan and loosen the cellulose hemicellulose network [45], while the chitinase in the latter helps hyphae grow and branch to continuously reshape its cell wall during the penetration of hard wood [46,47]. The number of gene families annotated as carbohydrate esterases (CEs) were smaller than those annotated as GHs and auxiliary activities (AAs), but the CE10 family had the highest number among all carbohydrate annotation categories (Supplementary Table S5). CE10 is a multifunctional esterase family and it has a very wide substrate spectrum [48]. The function of this family includes degradation of side chains of hemicellulose, cutting off the bonds of lignin-carbohydrate complexes (LCCs) and breaking down plant defense compounds [49,50]. We speculate that wood degradation by G. tsugae follows a sequential enzymatic strategy as follows: abundant CE10 enzymes unbind and loosen LCCs and hemicellulose side chains; then, GH16 enzymes extensively attack hemicellulose, while GH18 chitinase supports sustained hyphal growth; finally, other GHs and AAs enzymes further degrade the exposed cellulose and lignin.
The two Ganoderma tsugae strains used in this study were collected from different trees, i.e., Wu 2022 growing on Betula in the Altay region, Xinjiang, and Cui 14110 growing on Larix in the Lushuihe region, Jilin. Principal component analysis (PCA) of their transcriptional profiles under three culture substrates showed clear separability, reflecting a strong substrate-driven influence on gene expression (Figure 4). The dispersion of the Wu2022_C and Cui 14110_C cannot be ignored; it may suggest that this artificial substrate introduces distinct physiological or stress responses compared to natural sawdust, a pattern further supported by differential gene expression (DEG) analysis (Figure 5). Wu2022_C and Cui 14110_C showed 557 up-regulated and 1073 down-regulated DEGs, including 493 unique DEGs (Figure 7). Compared to it, when the strains induced under two kinds of natural sawdust, Wu 2022_B vs. Cui 14110_B and Wu 2022_L vs. Cui 14110_L) presented 300 shared DEGs (Supplementary Table S9). Functional annotation of these shared DEGs highlighted enrichment in metabolic processes (GO:0008152), transmembrane transport (K08192, MFS transporter), and lipid metabolism (K00059, 3-oxoacyl-ACP reductase). It indicates that faced with more complex and nutritionally imbalanced culture media with natural sawdust, G. tsugae may induce the expression of more genes related to metabolism. The purpose may be to degrade cellulose and hemicellulose to obtain energy [51], or to synthesize secondary metabolites such as triterpenes to protect itself from harm [52]. There are unexpectedly few DEGs when comparing the same strain on Larix or Betula (Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B and Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B), especially in the G. tsugae Wu 2022. It revealed that the inter-strain differences are greater than those induced by sawdust, suggesting the strains have essential differences in genetic background, physiological status, or response to environment/treatment.
The comparisons of Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B and Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B shared thirty-nine DEGs induced by two kinds of sawdust (Supplementary Table S10). The enrichment of these shared genes highlights a conserved transcriptional response essential for substrate adaptation. Most DEGs were annotated as catalytic activity (GO:0003824), which can enhance enzyme activity related to wood degradation [53], such as laccase, endoglucanase, acetylesterase, and so on [54,55]. This conserved induction underscores a fundamental strategy in G. tsugae to optimize its lignocellulolytic system when encountering natural woody substrates. PHI: 2393 (O-methylsterigmatocystin oxidoreductase) was noticed in Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B and Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B; it is one of the key enzymes for synthesizing aflatoxins [56]. However, for medicinal fungi, O-methylsterigmatocystin oxidoreductase may be involved in the activity of lignin-degrading enzymes such as lignin peroxidase or manganese peroxidase rather than synthesize toxins [57].
Among five comparisons, the distinct but interpretable patterns emerged in the functional annotation of DEGs that reflect both the conserved lifestyle and adaptive strategies of Ganoderma tsugae (Figure 9). The “catalytic activity”, “extracellular region”, and “oxidoreductase activity” of GO enrichment analysis were consistently enriched in five comparisons (Figure 8). This recurring profile aligns with the core functional signature of white-rot fungi, fundamentally shaped by their saprotrophic lifestyle—requiring extensive secretion of extracellular enzymes, redox balancing, and active energy metabolism to degrade lignocellulose [58,59,60]. Under KEGG annotation, most DEGs were related to class “Metabolism”, and “Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis” was the only shared pathway in five comparisons (Figure 9). Unlike plants, which synthesize lignin monomers through phenylpropanoid biosynthesis [61], G. tsugae has a large enzyme system capable of decomposing and metabolizing phenylpropane derivatives. There are eleven DEGs shared by five comparisons, regardless of the changes in strains or culture media. These DEGs were located across multiple contigs (JAHRBS010000001.1, JAHRBS010000002.1, JAHRBS010000003.1, JAHRBS010000004.1, JAHRBS010000006.1, JAHRBS010000009.1, JAHRBS0100000013.1, and JAHRBS0100000014.1), which accommodated a series of terpene synthase-related gene clusters in the reference genome (Ganoderma tsugae CCMJ4178) [14]. This genomic colocalization suggests that these conserved responses may be embedded within broader secondary metabolite regions, potentially coordinating chemical defense with substrate degradation. It is worth noting that “Heat shock protein 9/12”, “alcohol dehydrogenase”, and “Cytochrome p450” belong to class “Q: Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism”, endowing these genes with powerful functions based on the annotation of KOG database. Cytochrome p450 contributes to efficient lignocellulose degradation [62]; on the other hand, heat shock proteins help maintain protein structure and functional stability [63]; additionally, alcohol dehydrogenase aids in recovering degradation products [64]. Together, these conserved genes form a robust functional triad that enables G. tsugae to sustain efficient lignocellulose degradation while managing cellular stress and metabolic byproducts across varied environments.
Currently, artificial cultivation of Ganoderma tsugae has been achieved, and the differences in nutrient composition, cultural conditions, and strains sources can all affect the degradation and growth rates of G. tsugae. In this study, the genome and transcriptome analyses were conducted to preliminarily explore the genetic characteristics of G. tsugae induced by different culture media. It indicates that there are the following three types of significantly expressed genes in G. tsugae during the process of degrading wood: attack type degradation enzyme system, protective type defense enzyme system, and recycling type transport enzyme system. The synergistic operation of these enzymes enables G. tsugae to have strong environmental adaptability and ecological competitiveness, enabling it to survive and reproduce on both coniferous and broad-leaved trees. These findings help us gain a deeper understanding of the unique wood degradation mechanism of G. tsugae.

5. Conclusions

This study preliminarily elucidates the synergistic molecular mechanism of lignocellulose degradation in Ganoderma tsugae based on genomic and transcriptomic analyses. The high-quality genomes and comparative transcriptomes of two strains adapted to different hosts for G. tsugae were supplemented. Our results reveal that the fungus mobilizes a coordinated network involving degradative enzyme production, cellular protection, and secondary metabolite turnover to efficiently adapt to and deconstruct complex lignocellulosic matrices. This integrated strategy underpins its broad host range and high degradation efficacy on both coniferous and broad-leaved wood. Future investigations should focus on the functional validation of key regulatory genes and incorporation of proteomic and metabolomics data to validate enzyme secretion, track lignin degradation products, and perform functional validation on key candidate genes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof12010035/s1, Table S1: Annotation of two strains on NR database, Table S2: Annotation of two strains on eggNOG database, Table S3: Annotation of two strains on GO database, Table S4: Annotation of two strains on KEGG database, Table S5: Annotation of two strains on CAZymes database, Table S6: Transcriptional sequencing data and quality assessment, Table S7. GO enrichment analyses of DEGs among five comparisons, Table S8: KEGG enrichment analyses of DEGs among five comparisons, Table S9: Functional annotation information of 829 DEGs of Wu 2022_C vs. Cui 14110_C, Wu 2022_B vs. Cui 14110_B and Wu 2022_L vs. Cui 14110_L, Table S10: Functional annotation information of 39 shared DEGs of Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B and Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B, Table S11: Functional annotation information of unique DEGs of Wu 2022_L vs. Wu 2022_B and Cui 14110_L vs. Cui 14110_B, Table S12: Functional annotation information of eleven DEGs of five comparisons.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S. and B.C.; Methodology, Y.S., M.L. (Mengxue Lv), M.Z., and Y.F.; Formal Analysis, Y.S. and M.L. (Mengxue Lv); Resources, D.W. and N.G.; Data Curation, M.L. (Meiqin Luo) and Z.Y.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Y.S. and M.L. (Mengxue Lv); Writing—Review and Editing, Y.S. and B.C.; Visualization, Y.S. and Z.Y.; Supervision, Y.S. and B.C.; Project Administration, B.C.; Funding Acquisition, Y.S. and B.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was financed by National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFD1201600) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32325001, 32300002).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed for this study are included in this article and its supplementary materials (Tables S1–S12). The raw sequence data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive [65] in National Genomics Data Center [66], China National Center for Bioinformation/Beijing Institute of Genomics, and Chinese Academy of Sciences (GSA: CRA033453 and CRA034265), all of which are publicly accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa (accessed on 25 December 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sun, Y.F.; Xing, J.H.; He, X.L.; Wu, D.M.; Song, C.G.; Liu, S.; Vlasák, J.; Gates, G.; Gibertoni, T.B.; Cui, B.K. Species diversity, systematic revision and molecular phylogeny of Ganodermataceae (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) with an emphasis on Chinese collections. Stud. Mycol. 2016, 101, 287–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Annele, H. Lignin-modifying enzymes from selected white-rot fungi: Production and role from in lignin degradation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 13, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, S.D. Isolation and Purification of Laccase from the White Rot Fungus Leiotrametes lactinea and the Enzymatic Activity in Dye Degradation. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’An, China, 2021; pp. 1–82. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  4. Hu, S. Functional Genomics Analysis and Terpene Synthase-Related Gene Mining of Ganoderma tsugae. Master’s Thesis, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, 2023; pp. 1–69. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  5. Deng, W.; Zhao, W.; Yang, Y. Laccase purified from white-rot fungus Ganoderma lucidum. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, Q.; Wu, X.Q.; Zhang, X.J. Research progress in microbial degradation of straw lignin. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2014, 63, 4118–4132. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Łebkowska, M.; Załęska-Radziwiłł, M. Application of white-rot fungi for biodegradation of refractory organic compounds—A review. Desalination Water Treat. 2014, 52, 3708–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, H.; Jin, C.; Li, X.; Ma, J.X.; Ye, F.; Tang, L.X.; Si, J.; Cui, B.K. A green biocatalyst fabricated by fungal laccase immobilized onto Fe3O4@polyaniline-chitosan nanofibrous composites for the removal of phenolic compounds. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 507, 160486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Si, J.; Wu, Y.; Ma, H.F.; Cao, Y.J.; Sun, Y.F.; Cui, B.K. Selection of a pH- and temperature-stable laccase from Ganoderma australe and its application for bioremediation of textile dyes. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 299, 113619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, J.; Jiang, J.C.; Zhang, N.; Xu, H.; Xie, J.C.; Zhao, J. Research progress on lignin degradation by microorganism. Biomass Chem. Eng. 2021, 55, 62–70. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Yan, L.H.; Chen, X.Q.; Wang, L.; Yan, Y.S.; Hu, S.H. Medicinal value and artificial cultivation technology of Ganoderma tsugae in pine fir. Inn. Mong. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2009, 1, 123. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu, T.M.; Wu, D.M.; Gao, N.; Liu, S.; Sun, Y.F.; Cui, B.K. Species diversity, taxonomic classification and ecological habits of polypore fungi in China. Mycology 2025, 16, 419–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qin, G.F.; Xu, M.Q.; Dai, Y.C. The forest pathogens of root and butt rot in Northeast China. For. Res. 2000, 13, 15–22. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang, N.; Hu, S.; Pang, B.; Li, Z.H.; Yuan, X.H.; Xiao, S.J.; Fu, Y.P. Genome of Ganoderma species provides insights into the evolution, conifers substrate utilization, and terpene synthesis for Ganoderma tsugae. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 724451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, T.H.; Cai, M.J.; Hu, H.P.; Jiao, C.W.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.C.; Chen, J.; Xiao, C.; Li, X.M.; Gao, X.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing and transcriptome analysis of Ganoderma lucidum Strain Yw-1-5 provides new insights into the enhanced effect of Tween80 on exopolysaccharide production. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, Q.; Liu, H.; Shi, Y.X.; Li, W.T.; Huang, J.; Xue, F.F.; Liu, Y.N.; Liu, G.Q. Characteristics of the genome, transcriptome and ganoderic acid of the medicinal fungus Ganoderma lingzhi. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gaskell, J.; Blanchette, R.A.; Stewart, P.E.; BonDurant, S.S.; Adams, M.; Sabat, G.; Kersten, P.; Cullen, D. Transcriptome and secretome analyses of the wood decay fungus Wolfiporia cocos support alternative mechanisms of lignocellulose conversion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 3979–3987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martinez, D.; Challacombe, J.; Morgenstern, I.; Hibbett, D.; Schmoll, M.; Kubicek, C.P.; Ferreira, P.; Ruiz-Duenas, F.J.; Martinez, A.T.; Kersten, P.; et al. Genome, transcriptome, and secretome analysis of wood decay fungus Postia placenta supports unique mechanisms of lignocellulose conversion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106, 1954–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vanden Wymelenberg, A.; Gaskell, J.; Mozuch, M.; Sabat, G.; Ralph, J.; Skyba, O.; Mansfield, S.D.; Blanchette, R.A.; Martinez, D.; Grigoriev, I.; et al. Comparative transcriptome and secretome analysis of wood decay fungi Postia placenta and Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 3599–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tan, Y.; Yu, X.L.; Zhang, Z.G.; Tian, J.L.; Feng, N.; Tang, C.H.; Zou, G.; Zhang, J.S. An efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system for a Ganoderma lucidum cultivated strain by ribonucleoprotein method. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lv, D.M.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Z.X.; Zhang, Q.L.; Yan, J.P.; Xu, J.W. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Ganoderma lucidum: Recent advances and biotechnological opportunities. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 41, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Walker, B.J.; Abeel, T.; Shea, T.; Priest, M.; Abouelliel, A.; Sakthikumar, S.; Cuomo, C.A.; Zeng, Q.; Wortman, J.; Young, S.K.; et al. Pilon: An integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Majoros, W.H.; Pertea, M.; Salzberg, S.L. TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: Two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 2878–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Stanke, M.; Morgenstern, B. AUGUSTUS: A web server for gene prediction in eukaryotes that allows user-defined constraints. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W465–W467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ter-Hovhannisyan, V.; Lomsadze, A.; Chernoff, Y.; Borodovsky, M. Gene prediction in novel fungal genomes using an abinitio algorithm with unsupervised training. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 1979–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Benjamin, B.; Chao, X.; Huson, D.H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 59–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Conesa, A.; Götz, S.; García-Gómez, J.M.; Terol, J.; Talón, M.; Robles, M. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3674–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cantalapiedra, C.P.; Hernandez-Plaza, A.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5825–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Moriya, Y.; Itoh, M.; Okuda, S.; Yoshizawa, A.C.; Kanehisa, M. KAAS: An automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W182–W185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, L.; Feng, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X. DEGseq: An R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fehér, Z.; Szirák, K. Signal transduction in fungi—The role of protein phosphorylation. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 1999, 46, 269. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pawson, T. Specificity in signal transduction: From phosphotyrosine-SH2 domain interactions to complex cellular systems. Cell 2004, 116, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goldberg, A.L. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature 2003, 426, 895–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chu, X.L.; Feng, M.G.; Ying, S.H. Qualitative ubiquitome unveils the potential significances of protein lysine ubiquitination in hyphal growth of Aspergillus nidulans. Curr. Genet. 2016, 62, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kuppuraj, S.P.; Venkidasamy, B.; Selvaraj, D.; Ramalingam, S. Comprehensive in silico and gene expression profiles of MnP family genes in Phanerochaete chrysosporium towards lignin biodegradation. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2021, 157, 105143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cajnko, M.M.; Oblak, J.; Grilc, M.; Likozar, B. Enzymatic bioconversion process of lignin: Mechanisms, reactions and kinetics. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 340, 125655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D353–D361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Reis, V.C.B.; Torres, F.A.G.; Poças-Fonseca, M.J.; De-Souza, M.T.; De-Souza, D.P.; Almeida, J.R.M.; Marinho-Silva, C.; Parachin, N.S.; da Silva Dantas, A.; Mello-de-Sousa, T.M.; et al. Cell cycle, DNA replication, repair, and recombination in the dimorphic human pathogenic fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2005, 4, 232–250. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wood, W.A.; Kellogg, S.T. Biomass Part A: Cellulose and Hemicellulose; Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 1–774. [Google Scholar]
  43. Holyavka, M.G.; Artyukhov, V.G. Comparative analysis of the primary structures of glycoside hydrolases. Biochem. Suppl. Ser. B Biomed. Chem. 2023, 17, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Y.; Li, T.; Zhu, H.; Cao, L.H.; Liang, L.B.; Liu, D.Y.; Shen, Q.R. Methionine inducing carbohydrate esterase secretion of Trichoderma harzianum enhances the accessibility of substrate glycosidic bonds. Microb. Cell Factories 2024, 23, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vladimír, P.; Peter, B. Microbial xylanolytic carbohydrate esterases. Essays Biochem. 2023, 67, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bradley, E.L.; Ökmen, B.; Doehlemann, G.; Henrissat, B.; Bradshaw, R.E.; Mesarich, C.H. Secreted glycoside hydrolase proteins as effectors and invasion patterns of plant-associated fungi and Oomycetes. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 853106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Xiao, Y.; Lu, H.Q.; Liu, Y.; Sang, Y.X.; Sun, J.L. Whole-genome sequencing and functional analysis of a novel chitin-degrading strain Rhodococcus sp. 11-3. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2022, 134, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Biely, P. Microbial glucuronoyl esterases: 10 years after discovery. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 7014–7018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Masahiro, W.; Harumi, F.; Hiroyuki, I.; Kazuhiko, I. Crystal structure of an acetylesterase from Talaromyces cellulolyticus and the importance of a disulfide bond near the active site. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 1200–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pentari, C.; Katsimpouras, C.; Haon, M.; Berrin, J.; Zerva, A.; Topakas, E. Exploring the synergy between fungal CE15 glucuronoyl esterases and xylanases for lignocellulose saccharification. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2025, 18, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Selim, S.; Harun-Ur-Rashid, M.; Hamoud, Y.A.; Shaghaleh, H. Utilization of bacterial enzymes for cellulose and hemicelluloses degradations: Medical and industrial benefits. BioResources 2025, 20, 8135–8148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Adamczyk, S.; Latvala, S.; Poimala, A.; Adamczyk, B.; Hytönen, T.; Pennanen, T. Diterpenes and triterpenes show potential as biocides against pathogenic fungi and oomycetes: A screening study. Biotechnol. Lett. 2023, 45, 1555–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chauhan, P.S. Role of various bacterial enzymes in complete depolymerization of lignin: A review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 23, 101498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dong, C.D.; Tiwari, A.; Anisha, G.S.; Chen, C.W.; Singh, A.; Haldar, D.; Patel, A.K.; Singhania, R.R. Laccase: A potential biocatalyst for pollutant degradation. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 319, 120999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Varnaite, R.; Raudoniene, V.; Bridziuviene, D. Enzymatic biodegradation of lignin-cellulose complex in plant origin material. Mater. Sci.-Medzg. 2011, 17, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Prieto, R.; Woloshuk, C.P. Ord1, an oxidoreductase gene responsible for conversion of O-methylsterigmatocystin to aflatoxin in Aspergillus flavus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 1661–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yu, J.; Chang, P.K.; Ehrlich, K.C.; Cary, J.W.; Montalbano, B.; Dyer, J.M.; Bhatnagar, D.; Cleveland, T.E. Characterization of the critical amino acids of an Aspergillus parasiticus Cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase encoded by ordA that is involved in the biosynthesis of aflatoxins B1, G1, B2, and G2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 64, 4834–4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Reading, N.S.; Welch, K.D.; Aust, S.D. Free radical reactions of wood-degrading fungi. Wood Deterior. Preserv. 2003, 845, 16–31. [Google Scholar]
  59. Martínez, A.T.; Speranza, M.; Ruiz-Dueñas, F.J.; Ferreira, P.; Camarero, S.; Guillén, F.; Martínez, M.J.; Gutiérrez, A.; del Río, J.C. Biodegradation of lignocellulosics: Microbial, chemical, and enzymatic aspects of the fungal attack of lignin. Int. Microbiol. 2005, 8, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Daâssi, D.; Zouari-Mechichi, H.; Belbahri, L.; Barriuso, J.; Martínez, M.J.; Nasri, M.; Tahar, M.T. Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of Tunisian forest wood-degrading fungi: A wealth of novelties and opportunities for biotechnology. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yao, T.; Feng, K.; Xie, M.; Barros, J.; Tschaplinski, T.J.; Tuskan, G.A.; Muchero, W.; Chen, J.G. Phylogenetic occurrence of the phenylpropanoid pathway and lignin biosynthesis in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 704697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mori, T.; Ohno, H.; Ichinose, H.; Hirokazu, K.; Hirofumi, H. White-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium metabolizes chloropyridinyl-type neonicotinoid insecticides by an N-dealkylation reaction catalyzed by two cytochrome P450s. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 123831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Morel, M.; Meux, E.; Mathieu, Y.; Thuillier, A.; Chibani, K.; Harvengt, L.; Jacquot, J.P.; Gelhaye, E. Xenomic networks variability and adaptation traits in wood decaying fungi. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Young, D.; Rice, J.; Martin, R.; Lindquist, E.; Lipzen, A.; Grigoriev, I.; Hibbett, D. Degradation of bunker C fuel oil by white-rot fungi in sawdust cultures suggests potential applications in bioremediation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, S.S.; Chen, X.; Jin, E.H.; Wang, A.K.; Chen, T.T.; Zhang, X.L.; Zhu, J.W.; Dong, L.L.; Sun, Y.L.; Yu, C.X.; et al. The GSA Family in 2025: A broadened sharing platform for multi-omics and multimodal data. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2025, 23, qzaf072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. CNCB-NGDC Members and Partners. Database Resources of the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D30–D44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Download PDF
Quantitative Morphological Profiling and Isolate-Specific Insensitivity of Cacao Pathogens to Novel Bio-Based Phenolic Amides
Previous
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Experience in the Management of Culture-Positive Mucormycosis: Observation from a Large Healthcare System
Next