Spatial Variation in Cd, Pb, Hg, and Zn Accumulation in Edible Wild-Growing Mushroom Species from Different Environmentally Loaded Areas in Southern Poland: Risk Assessment and Implications for Consumer Safety
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Material
- mushroom cluster—1 sample;
- single mushrooms in close proximity (approx. 20 m)—1 sample.
Site-Specific Characterization of Fruiting Body Sampling Locations in Industrial and Non-Industrial Forest Areas of Southern Poland
2.2. Laboratory Analysis of Metals Content in Test Samples
- Stage I: duration: 20 min., temperature: 210 °C., generator power: 1800 W;
- Stage II: duration: 15 min., temperature: 210 °C., generator power: 1800 W;
- Stage III: cooling process: 30 min.
2.3. Toxicological Risk Assessment
2.4. Statistical Analysis
2.5. Justification for Species Aggregation
3. Results
3.1. Sample Characteristics and Environmental Context
3.2. Metals Concentrations in Mushroom Species Across Industrial and Non-Industrial Sites
3.3. Spatial Variation in Metals Concentrations Within Non-Industrial Sites
3.4. Influence of Distance from Emission Sources on Elements Concentrations in Industrial Sites
3.5. Influence of Geographical Position Relative to Emission Sources on Elements Concentrations in Industrial Sites
3.6. Multivariable Analysis of Metals Concentrations by Distance, Position, and Species in Industrial Sites
3.7. Toxicological Risk Assessment
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ronda, O.; Grządka, E.; Ostolska, I.; Orzeł, J.; Cieślik, B.M. Accumulation of radioisotopes and heavy metals in selected species of mushrooms. Food Chem. 2022, 367, 130670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- El-Ramady, H.; Abdalla, N.; Badgar, K.; Llanaj, X.; Törős, G.; Hajdú, P.; Eid, Y.; Prokisch, J. Edible mushrooms for sustainable and healthy human food: Nutritional and medicinal attributes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assemie, A.; Abaya, G. The effect of edible mushroom on health and their biochemistry. Int. J. Microbiol. 2022, 2022, 8744788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dowlati, M.; Sobhi, H.R.; Esrafili, A.; Farzadkia, M.; Yeganeh, M. Heavy metals content in edible mushrooms: A systematic review, meta-analysis and health risk assessment. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sithole, S.C.; Agboola, O.O.; Mugivhisa, L.L.; Amoo, S.O.; Olowoyo, J.O. Elemental concentration of heavy metals in oyster mushrooms grown on mine-polluted soils in Pretoria, South Africa. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2022, 34, 101763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esmaeili, A.; Shamaei, S.; Aghaee, E.M.; Akhtar, Z.N.; Hosseini, S.F.; Shokri, S. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in edible mushrooms and their effect on anemia: A review study. J. Chem. Health Risks 2022, 12, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pająk, M.; Gąsiorek, M.; Jasik, M.; Halecki, W.; Otremba, K.; Pietrzykowski, M. Risk assessment of potential food-chain threats from edible wild mushrooms collected in forest ecosystems with heavy-metal pollution in Upper Silesia, Poland. Forests 2020, 11, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimopoulou, M.; Kolonas, A.; Mourtakos, S.; Androutsos, O.; Gortzi, O. Nutritional composition and biological properties of sixteen edible mushroom species. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.; Prakash, B. Edible mushrooms: Nutritional composition and medicinal benefits for improvement in quality life. In Research and Technological Advances in Food Science; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 269–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Saini, R.K.; Kumar, A.; Chawla, P.; Kaushik, R. Mushrooms as nutritional powerhouses: A review of their bioactive compounds, health benefits, and value-added products. Foods 2025, 14, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sganzerla, W.G.; Todorov, S.D.; da Silva, A.P. Research trends in the study of edible mushrooms: Nutritional properties and health benefits. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2022, 24, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatnarin, S.; Thirabunyanon, M. Potential bioactivities via anticancer, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties of cultured mycelial-enriched β-D-glucan polysaccharides from a novel fungus Ophiocordyceps sinensis OS8. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1150287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dumlupinar, B. Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activities of terrestrial fungal polysaccharides: A review. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2021, 69, 417–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drzewiecka, B.; Wessely-Szponder, J.; Świeca, M.; Espinal, P.; Fusté, E.; Fernández-De La Cruz, E. Bioactive peptides and other immunomodulators of mushroom origin. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arunachalam, K.; Sreeja, P.S.; Yang, X. The antioxidant properties of mushroom polysaccharides can potentially mitigate oxidative stress, beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 874474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, D.J.; Choi, C. Antiviral bioactive compounds of mushrooms and their antiviral mechanisms: A review. Viruses 2021, 13, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ying, Y.; Hao, W. Immunomodulatory function and anti-tumor mechanism of natural polysaccharides: A review. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1147641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathak, M.P.; Pathak, K.; Saikia, R.; Gogoi, U.; Ahmad, M.Z.; Patowary, P.; Das, A. Immunomodulatory effect of mushrooms and their bioactive compounds in cancer: A comprehensive review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 149, 112901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Guo, Q.; Zhou, T.; Liu, L. Levels and health risk assessment of inorganic arsenic, methylmercury, and heavy metals in edible mushrooms collected from online supermarket in China. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2024, 202, 1802–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarikurkcu, C.; Yildiz, D.; Akata, I.; Tepe, B. Evaluation of the metal concentrations of wild mushroom species with their health risk assessments. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 21437–21454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, S.; Liu, H.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. Research progress on elements of wild edible mushrooms. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jomova, K.; Alomar, S.Y.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Heavy metals: Toxicity and human health effects. Arch. Toxicol. 2025, 99, 153–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bharti, R.; Sharma, R. Effect of heavy metals: An overview. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 51, 880–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abd Elnabi, M.K.; Elkaliny, N.E.; Elyazied, M.M.; Azab, S.H.; Elkhalifa, S.A.; Elmasry, S.; Mouhamed, M.S.; Shalamesh, E.M.; Alhorieny, N.A.; Abd Elaty, A.E.; et al. Toxicity of heavy metals and recent advances in their removal: A review. Toxics 2023, 11, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qu, F.; Zheng, W. Cadmium exposure: Mechanisms and pathways of toxicity and implications for human health. Toxics 2024, 12, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuhra, N.; Akhtar, T.; Yasin, R.; Ghafoor, I.; Asad, M.; Qadeer, A.; Javed, S. Human health effects of chronic cadmium exposure. In Cadmium Toxicity Mitigation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 65–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saatloo, N.V.; Ebrahiminejad, B.; Sadighara, P.; Manafi, L.; Yazdanfar, N.; Fallahizadeh, S. Quantification and human health risk assessment of cadmium and lead in wheat flour on the Iranian market by atomic absorption spectrometry. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 100438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandal, G.C.; Mandal, A.; Chakraborty, A. The toxic effect of lead on human health: A review. Hum. Biol. Public Health 2022, 3, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collin, M.S.; Venkatraman, S.K.; Vijayakumar, N.; Kanimozhi, V.; Arbaaz, S.M.; Stacey, R.S.; Anusha, J.; Choudhary, R.; Lvov, V.; Tovar, G.I.; et al. Bioaccumulation of lead (Pb) and its effects on human: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 7, 100094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charkiewicz, A.E.; Omeljaniuk, W.J.; Garley, M.; Nikliński, J. Mercury exposure and health effects: What do we really know? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.S.; Osman, A.I.; Hosny, M.; Elgarahy, A.M.; Eltaweil, A.S.; Rooney, D.W.; Chen, Z.; Rahim, N.S.; Sekar, M.; Gopinath, S.C.; et al. The toxicity of mercury and its chemical compounds: Molecular mechanisms and environmental and human health implications: A comprehensive review. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 5100–5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schoofs, H.; Schmit, J.; Rink, L. Zinc toxicity: Understanding the limits. Molecules 2024, 29, 3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stiles, L.I.; Ferrao, K.; Mehta, K.J. Role of zinc in health and disease. Clin. Exp. Med. 2024, 24, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, M.M.; Hossain, D.; Khan, M.S.; Begum, M.; Osman, M.H. Environmental pollution with heavy metals: A public health concern. In Heavy Metals—Their Environmental Impacts and Mitigation; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadi, A.A.; Zarei, A.; Esmaeilzadeh, M.; Taghavi, M.; Yousefi, M.; Yousefi, Z.; Sedighi, F.; Javan, S. Assessment of heavy metal pollution and human health risks in soils around an industrial zone in Neyshabur, Iran. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 195, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dmyterko, E.; Bruchwald, A. Changes occurring in the forests of the Beskid Mały. Sylwan 2019, 163, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbandeh, M.; Kaim, D.; Kozak, J. The substantial increase of forest cover in central Poland following extensive land abandonment: Szydłowiec County case study. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niezgoda, M.; Dziubanek, G.; Rogala, D.; Niesler, A. Health risks for consumers of forest ground cover produce contaminated with heavy metals. Toxics 2024, 12, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandziora-Ciupa, M.; Nadgórska-Socha, A.; Barczyk, G. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals and ecophysiological responses to heavy metal stress in selected populations of Vaccinium myrtillus L. and Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. Ecotoxicology 2017, 26, 966–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kicińska, A.; Gruszecka-Kosowska, A. Long-term changes of metal contents in two metallophyte species (Olkusz area of Zn-Pb ores, Poland). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zakrzewska, M.; Klimek, B. Trace element concentrations in tree leaves and lichen collected along a metal pollution gradient near Olkusz (Southern Poland). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2018, 100, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dresler, S.; Wójciak, M.; Sowa, I.; Sawicki, J.; Strzemski, M.; Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Hanaka, A. Accumulation ability of metals by silver birch leaves in areas contaminated by Zn-Pb ore processing: Effects of excessive metal accumulation on specialized metabolism. Chemosphere 2024, 362, 142719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kicińska, A. Environmental risk related to presence and mobility of As, Cd and Tl in soils in the vicinity of a metallurgical plant—Long-term observations. Chemosphere 2019, 236, 124308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarosławiecka, A.K.; Piotrowska-Seget, Z. The effect of heavy metals on microbial communities in industrial soil in the area of Piekary Śląskie and Bukowno (Poland). Microbiol. Res. 2022, 13, 626–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magiera, T.; Szuszkiewicz, M.M.; Michczyński, A.; Chróst, L.; Szuszkiewicz, M. Peat bogs as archives of local ore mining and smelting activities over the centuries: A case study of Miasteczko Śląskie (Upper Silesia, Poland). Catena 2021, 198, 105063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witkowski, A.J.; Dąbrowska, D.; Wróbel, J. Groundwater quality assessment in the area of the zinc smelter in Miasteczko Śląskie (Poland) using selected metal indices. Water 2024, 16, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miśkowiec, P.; Łaptaś, A.; Zięba, K. Soil pollution with heavy metals in industrial and agricultural areas: A case study of Olkusz District. J. Elem. 2015, 20, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López, A.R.; Ortega-Caneda, E.; Espada-Bellido, E.; Spanu, D.; Zava, M.; Monticelli, D. Decoding element speciation in mushrooms: Analytical techniques, comprehensive data review, and health implications. Food Chem. 2025, 463, 141460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asensio, J.P. Study of heavy metals and methyl-mercury in fungi in markets of Madrid. Spectrosc. Suppl. 2023, 38, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006. Off. J. Eur. Union 2023, 119, 103–157. [Google Scholar]
- The European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/73 of 16 January 2018, amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to maximum residue levels for mercury compounds in or on certain products. Off. J. Eur. Union 2018, 13, 8–20. [Google Scholar]
- US EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency. Exposure Assessment Tools by Routes–Ingestion. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/expobox/exposure-assessment-tools-routes-ingestion (accessed on 28 October 2024).
- Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Budżety Gospodarstw Domowych w 2023 Roku; GUS: Warszawa, Poland, 2024. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/warunki-zycia/dochody-wydatkii-warunki-zycia-ludnosci/budzety-gospodarstw-domowych-w-2023-roku,9,22.html (accessed on 17 June 2025).
- Główny Inspektorat Sanitarny. Wartość odżywcza i Przydatność Kulinarna Grzybów. Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/gis/wartosc-odzywcza-przydatnosc-kulinarna-grzybow (accessed on 17 June 2025).
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Calculating Hazard Quotients and Cancer Risk Estimates. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pha-guidance/conducting_scientific_evaluations/epcs_and_exposure_calculations/hazardquotients_cancerrisk.html (accessed on 28 October 2024).
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Zinc. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS); U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. Available online: https://iris.epa.gov/ChemicalLanding/&substance_nmbr=426 (accessed on 17 June 2025).
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cadmium. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS); U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 1989. Available online: https://iris.epa.gov/ChemicalLanding/&substance_nmbr=141 (accessed on 17 June 2025).
- FAO/WHO. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods; Fifth Session CF/5INF/1; 21–25 March 2011; FAO/WHO: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2011; Available online: https://www.fao.org/input/download/report/758/REP11_CFe.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2025).
- Demkova, L.; Arvay, J.; Hauptvogl, M.; Michalkova, J.; Šnirc, M.; Harangozo, Ľ.; Bobuľská, L.; Bajčan, D.; Kunca, V. Mercury content in three edible wild-growing mushroom species from different environmentally loaded areas in Slovakia: An ecological and human health risk assessment. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EPA. Understanding the PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Proposal Hazard Index 2023. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-03/How%20do%20I%20calculate%20the%20Hazard%20Index._3.14.23.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2025).
- Sun, Z.; Scherer, L.; Tukker, A.; Spawn-Lee, S.A.; Bruckner, M.; Gibbs, H.K.; Behrens, P. Dietary change in high-income nations alone can lead to substantial double climate dividend. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bunge, A.C.; Mazac, R.; Clark, M.; Wood, A.; Gordon, L. Sustainability benefits of transitioning from current diets to plant-based alternatives or whole-food diets in Sweden. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maganinho, M.; Almeida, C.; Padrão, P. Industrially produced plant-based food products: Nutritional value and degree of processing. Foods 2024, 13, 1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Díaz-Balteiro, L.; Alfranca, O.; Voces, R.; Soliño, M. Using Google search patterns to explain the demand for wild edible mushrooms. For. Policy Econ. 2023, 152, 102993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Procházka, P.; Soukupová, J.; Mullen, K.J.; Tomšík, K., Jr.; Čábelková, I. Wild mushrooms as a source of protein: A case study from Central Europe, especially the Czech Republic. Foods 2023, 12, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H. The relationship between morningness–eveningness and naturalness bias. Chronobiol. Int. 2024, 41, 1255–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bucurica, I.A.; Dulama, I.D.; Radulescu, C.; Banica, A.L.; Stanescu, S.G. Heavy metals and associated risks of wild edible mushrooms consumption: Transfer factor, carcinogenic risk, and health risk index. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, G.; Liu, J.; Zou, K.; He, F.; Li, Y.; Liu, R.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, G.; Wang, T.; Chen, B. Analysis of heavy metal characteristics and health risks of edible mushrooms in the mid-western region of China. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 26960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stojek, K.; Czortek, P.; Bobrowska-Korczak, B.; Krośniak, M.; Jaroszewicz, B. Fungal species and element type modulate the effects of environmental factors on the concentration of potentially toxic elements in mushrooms. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 353, 124152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gałgowska, M.; Pietrzak-Fiećko, R. Cadmium and lead content in selected fungi from Poland and their edible safety assessment. Molecules 2021, 26, 7289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demková, L.; Šnirc, M.; Jančo, I.; Harangozo, Ľ.; Hauptvogl, M.; Bobuľská, L.; Kunca, V.; Árvay, J. Blusher mushroom (Amanita rubescens Pers.): A study of mercury content in substrate and mushroom samples from Slovakia with respect to locality and developmental stages. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2025, 203, 1721–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Characteristic | Site Sampling | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Industrial | Industrial | ||||
| West Site, 0–200 m from Emission Source | East Site, 0–200 m from Emission Source | West Site, 200–600 m from Emission Source | East Site, 200–600 m from Emission Source | ||
| Mushroom Species (Acronym), n (%): | |||||
| AS | 3 (3.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| BE | 38 (38%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| BER | 15 (15%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| CC | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| LA | 5 (5.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| LS | 3 (3.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (9.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| MP | 9 (9.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.5%) | 0 (0%) |
| RV | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| SLG | 15 (15%) | 11 (38%) | 13 (65%) | 12 (55%) | 13 (45%) |
| XCS | 10 (10%) | 18 (62%) | 7 (35%) | 7 (32%) | 16 (55%) |
| Sampling County, n (%): | |||||
| Olkusz | 0 (0%) | 11 (38%) | 13 (65%) | 13 (59%) | 13 (45%) |
| Szydłowiec | 50 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Tarnowskie Góry | 0 (0%) | 18 (62%) | 7 (35%) | 9 (41%) | 16 (55%) |
| Wadowice | 50 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| SLG | LS | XCS | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Industrial | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
| Zn | 7.10 | 2.93 | 4.32 | 15.67 | 11.25 | 5.36 | 7.64 | 17.41 | 15.00 | 5.69 | 8.49 | 25.34 |
| Cd | 0.28 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.68 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.24 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.09 | 1.31 |
| Hg | 0.019 | 0.010 | 0.002 | 0.035 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.016 | 0.049 | 0.050 | 0.002 | 0.129 |
| Pb | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.24 | <LOQ | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.64 | |||
| Industrial | ||||||||||||
| Zn | 9.63 | 7.60 | 4.35 | 57.66 | 8.93 | 4.31 | 5.88 | 11.97 | 28.53 | 19.06 | 4.58 | 77.40 |
| Cd | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.52 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 3.12 | 1.79 | 0.17 | 6.57 |
| Hg | 0.189 | 0.272 | 0.001 | 0.500 | <LOQ | 0.051 | 0.031 | 0.011 | 0.199 | |||
| Pb | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 1.88 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.30 | 0.71 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 1.95 |
| West Site, 0–200 m from Emission Source | ||||||||||||
| Zn | 6.35 | 1.58 | 4.35 | 9.28 | NS | 19.59 | 10.11 | 7.45 | 40.59 | |||
| Cd | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 2.28 | 1.34 | 0.17 | 4.47 | ||||
| Hg | <LOQ | 0.046 | 0.024 | 0.011 | 0.100 | |||||||
| Pb | 0.31 | 0.08 | 0.24 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.04 | 1.95 | ||||
| East Site, 0–200 m from Emission Source | ||||||||||||
| Zn | 14.02 | 14.45 | 5.41 | 57.66 | NS | 29.96 | 23.62 | 4.58 | 54.96 | |||
| Cd | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.52 | 2.11 | 2.14 | 0.65 | 5.86 | ||||
| Hg | 0.283 | 0.308 | 0.065 | 0.500 | 0.084 | 0.057 | 0.035 | 0.199 | ||||
| Pb | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.11 | 1.88 | 1.00 | 0.18 | 0.89 | 1.39 | ||||
| West Site, 200–600 m from Emission Source | ||||||||||||
| Zn | 9.14 | 2.17 | 6.20 | 13.16 | 8.93 | 4.31 | 5.88 | 11.97 | 46.24 | 25.92 | 13.00 | 77.40 |
| Cd | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 3.08 | 0.93 | 1.77 | 3.99 |
| Hg | - | - | - | - | <LOQ | 0.033 | 0.007 | 0.020 | 0.040 | |||
| Pb | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.42 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.30 | 0.49 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 1.03 |
| East Site, 200–600 m from Emission Source | ||||||||||||
| Zn | 8.83 | 1.60 | 6.67 | 12.00 | NS | 30.21 | 16.86 | 11.60 | 71.49 | |||
| Cd | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 4.52 | 1.56 | 0.35 | 6.57 | ||||
| Hg | <LOQ | 0.047 | 0.016 | 0.015 | 0.073 | |||||||
| Pb | 0.26 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.37 | 0.81 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 1.32 | ||||
| Stratification Variable | Stratum | N | Zn | Cd | Hg | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling site characteristics | Industrial | 100 | 11.24 (7.56–22.79) | 0.35 (0.16–3.40) | 0.001 (0.001–0.04) | 0.33 (0.26–0.71) |
| Non-industrial | 100 | 12.04 (7.68–15.68) | 0.35 (0.18–0.61) | 0.13 (0.02–0.27) | 0.09 (0.09–0.10) | |
| County | Olkusz | 50 | 8.49 (6.67–10.01) | 0.16 (0.12–0.20) | 0.001 (0.001–0.001) | 0.27 (0.14–0.30) |
| Szydłowiec | 50 | 14.74 (12.41–17.83) | 0.49 (0.31–0.68) | 0.17 (0.07–0.29) | 0.09 (0.09–0.18) | |
| Tarnowskie Góry | 50 | 22.79 (14.22–41.05) | 3.40 (1.42–4.47) | 0.04 (0.03–0.06) | 0.68 (0.40–0.97) | |
| Wadowice | 50 | 8.32 (6.08–11.25) | 0.22 (0.12–0.43) | 0.05 (0.02–0.22) | 0.09 (0.09–0.09) | |
| Distance from emission source (m) | 0–200 | 49 | 10.85 (7.38–22.35) | 0.22 (0.18–2.48) | 0.001 (0.001–0.04) | 0.31 (0.26–0.47) |
| 200–600 | 51 | 11.84 (8.45–27.67) | 0.40 (0.13–4.47) | 0.02 (0.001–0.06) | 0.43 (0.25–0.94) | |
| Geographical position | East | 49 | 11.60 (8.94–27.67) | 0.22 (0.17–4.12) | 0.001 (0.001–0.04) | 0.31 (0.24–0.56) |
| West | 51 | 10.52 (6.41–22.35) | 0.45 (0.15–1.71) | 0.01 (0.001–0.06) | 0.34 (0.26–0.89) |
| Concentrations | N | n1 | Non-Industrial | n2 | Industrial | Median Difference (Industrial—Non-Industrial) | p | padj | Effect Size (r) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | ||||||||
| SLG | |||||||||
| Zn | 64 | 49 | 6.85 (4.75–7.42) | 15 | 8.52 (6.68–10.01) | 1.67 (95% CI: −0.62 to 3.96) | 0.017 | 0.034 | 0.41 |
| Cd | 64 | 49 | 0.23 (0.19–0.34) | 15 | 0.15 (0.12–0.19) | −0.08 (95% CI: −0.15 to −0.01) | <0.001 | 0.004 | −0.67 |
| Hg | 64 | 49 | 0.019 (0.011–0.024) | 15 | 0.001 (0.001–0.001) | −0.018 (95% CI: −0.022 to −0.014) | <0.001 | 0.004 | −0.67 |
| Pb | 64 | 49 | 0.09 (0.09–0.09) | 15 | 0.27 (0.18–0.30) | 0.18 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.26) | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.67 |
| LS | |||||||||
| Zn | 5 | 2 | 8.70 (7.64–17.41) | 3 | 8.93 (5.88–11.97) | Not applied 1 | 0.800 | 0.800 | Not applied |
| Cd | 5 | 2 | 0.19 (0.06–0.24) | 3 | 0.36 (0.31–0.40) | 0.200 | 0.240 | ||
| Hg | 5 | 2 | 0.014 (0.003–0.016) | 3 | 0.001 (0.001–0.001) | 0.139 | 0.185 | ||
| Pb | 5 | 2 | 0.09 (0.09–0.09) | 3 | 0.22 (0.14–0.30) | 0.107 | 0.161 | ||
| XCS | |||||||||
| Zn | 58 | 10 | 14.30 (10.42–16.64) | 48 | 22.79 (13.87–40.82) | 8.49 (95% CI: 0.19 to 19.17) | 0.032 | 0.055 | 0.43 |
| Cd | 58 | 10 | 0.47 (0.20–0.86) | 48 | 3.53 (1.53–4.56) | 3.06 (95% CI: 1.86 to 4.26) | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.67 |
| Hg | 58 | 10 | 0.039 (0.004–0.084) | 48 | 0.042 (0.032–0.061) | 0.003 (95% CI: −0.060 to 0.066) | 0.765 | 0.765 | 0.06 |
| Pb | 58 | 10 | 0.09 (0.09–0.10) | 48 | 0.63 (0.40–0.95) | 0.54 (95% CI: 0.34 to 0.73) | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.67 |
| Concentrations | N | n1 | Szydłowiec County Median (IQR) | n2 | Wadowice County Median (IQR) | Median Difference | p | padj | Effect Size (r) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Wadowice—Szydłowiec) | |||||||||
| BE | |||||||||
| Zn | 38 | 33 | 14.82 (12.41–17.71) | 5 | 15.68 (14.88–16.21) | 0.86 (95% CI: −0.73 to 2.45) | 0.635 | 1.000 | 0.08 |
| Cd | 38 | 33 | 0.54 (0.42–0.73) | 5 | 0.60 (0.58–0.64) | 0.06 (95% CI: −0.05 to 0.17) | 0.635 | 1.000 | 0.08 |
| Hg | 38 | 33 | 0.263 (0.113–0.370) | 5 | 0.481 (0.332–0.538) | 0.218 (95% CI: 0.034 to 0.402) | 0.063 | 0.252 | 0.30 |
| Pb | 38 | 33 | 0.09 (0.09–0.10) | 5 | 0.09 (0.09–0.10) | 0.00 (95% CI: −0.01 to 0.01) | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.00 |
| BER | |||||||||
| Zn | 15 | 3 | 14.40 (14.35–25.36) | 12 | 8.99 (6.62–11.61) | Not applied 1 | 0.018 | 0.144 | Not applied 1 |
| Cd | 15 | 3 | 0.12 (0.07–0.16) | 12 | 0.28 (0.11–0.42) | Not applied 1 | 0.233 | 0.622 | Not applied 1 |
| Hg | 15 | 3 | 0.152 (0.021–0.168) | 12 | 0.133 (0.018–0.236) | Not applied 1 | 0.945 | 1.000 | Not applied 1 |
| Pb | 15 | 3 | 0.09 (0.09–1.07) | 12 | 0.09 (0.09–0.10) | Not applied 1 | 0.643 | 1.000 | Not applied 1 |
| Concentrations | N | n1 | 0–200 m Median (IQR) | n2 | 200–600 m Median (IQR) | Median Difference | p | padj | Effect Size (r) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (200–600 m–0–200 m) | |||||||||
| XCS | |||||||||
| Zn | 48 | 25 | 22.35 (13.00–33.34) | 23 | 27.67 (14.24–46.01) | 5.32 (95% CI: −2.13 to 12.77) | 0.436 | 0.498 | 0.15 |
| Cd | 48 | 25 | 2.48 (1.68–3.63) | 23 | 4.64 (1.17–5.21) | 2.16 (95% CI: 1.02 to 3.30) | 0.007 | 0.028 | 0.38 |
| Hg | 48 | 25 | 0.037 (0.030–0.045) | 23 | 0.048 (0.040–0.065) | 0.011 (95% CI: 0.002 to 0.020) | 0.025 | 0.050 | 0.30 |
| Pb | 48 | 25 | 0.41 (0.29–0.72) | 23 | 0.93 (0.57–1.07) | 0.52 (95% CI: 0.31 to 0.73) | <0.001 | 0.008 | 0.55 |
| SLG | |||||||||
| Zn | 49 | 24 | 7.38 (6.11–9.33) | 25 | 8.99 (7.76–10.56) | 1.61 (95% CI: −0.18 to 3.40) | 0.055 | 0.088 | 0.27 |
| Cd | 49 | 24 | 0.19 (0.15–0.21) | 25 | 0.13 (0.11–0.17) | −0.06 (95% CI: −0.09 to −0.03) | 0.015 | 0.040 | −0.35 |
| Hg | 49 | 24 | 0.001 (0.001–0.001) | 25 | 0.001 (0.001–0.001) | 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.00) | 0.170 | 0.227 | 0.00 |
| Pb | 49 | 24 | 0.27 (0.14–0.31) | 25 | 0.26 (0.18–0.29) | −0.01 (95% CI: −0.08 to 0.06) | 0.644 | 0.644 | −0.07 |
| Concentrations | N | n1 | East Median (IQR) | n2 | West Median (IQR) | Median Difference (West–East) | p | padj | Effect Size (r) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLG | |||||||||
| Zn | 49 | 26 | 8.94 (7.38–10.80) | 23 | 7.50 (5.89–9.48) | −1.44 (95% CI: −3.14 to 0.26) | 0.083 | 0.166 | −0.25 |
| Cd | 49 | 26 | 0.17 (0.13–0.19) | 23 | 0.15 (0.11–0.20) | −0.02 (95% CI: −0.06 to 0.02) | 0.388 | 0.517 | −0.12 |
| Hg | 49 | 26 | 0.001 (0.001–0.001) | 23 | 0.001 (0.001–0.001) | 0.00 (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.00) | 0.136 | 0.218 | −0.20 |
| Pb | 49 | 26 | 0.25 (0.09–0.29) | 23 | 0.27 (0.24–0.35) | 0.02 (95% CI: −0.04 to 0.08) | 0.075 | 0.200 | 0.26 |
| XCS | |||||||||
| Zn | 48 | 23 | 30.90 (16.42–49.42) | 25 | 16.94 (10.52–31.21) | −13.96 (95% CI: −22.15 to −5.77) | 0.024 | 0.096 | −0.32 |
| Cd | 48 | 23 | 4.43 (3.50–5.05) | 25 | 1.71 (1.11–3.55) | −2.72 (95% CI: −3.51 to −1.93) | <0.001 | 0.008 | −0.52 |
| Hg | 48 | 23 | 0.040 (0.032–0.056) | 25 | 0.045 (0.032–0.072) | 0.005 (95% CI: −0.007 to 0.017) | 0.337 | 0.539 | 0.14 |
| Pb | 48 | 23 | 0.57 (0.47–1.04) | 25 | 0.72 (0.34–0.94) | 0.15 (95% CI: −0.10 to 0.40) | 0.728 | 0.728 | 0.07 |
| Predictor | Zn | Cd | Hg | Pb | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | p | β | 95% CI | p | β | 95% CI | p | β | 95% CI | p | |
| Intercept [concentration (log) for SLG at 0–200 m, east position] | 2.11 | (1.87–2.35) | <0.001 | −1.68 | (−1.88–−1.48) | <0.001 | −6.91 | (−7.21, −6.60) | <0.001 | −1.60 | (−1.87–−1.34) | <0.001 |
| Distance: 200–600 m [vs. Distance: 0 –200 m] | 0.13 | (−0.15–0.41) | 0.369 | −0.31 | (−0.55–−0.07) | 0.014 | −1.20 × 10−15 | (−0.36, 0.36) | 1.000 | −0.03 | (−0.35–0.29) | 0.857 |
| Position: West [vs. Position: East] | −0.20 | (−0.48–0.09) | 0.174 | −0.17 | (−0.41–0.08) | 0.179 | −1.87 × 10−16 | (-0.36, 0.36) | 1.000 | 0.26 | (−0.06–0.59) | 0.110 |
| Species: XCS [vs. Species: SLG] | 1.49 | (1.11–1.86) | <0.001 | 3.03 | (2.71–3.35) | <0.001 | 2.98 | (2.50, 3.46) | <0.001 | 0.69 | (0.27–1.12) | 0.002 |
| Distance: 200–600 m × Species: XCS [vs. Distance: 0–200 m × Species: SLG] | −0.41 | (−0.83–0.01) | 0.058 | 0.40 | (0.05–0.76) | 0.029 | 0.79 | (0.25, 1.32) | 0.004 | 0.69 | (0.21–1.16) | 0.005 |
| Position: West × Species: XCS [vs. Position: East × Species: SLG] | −0.47 | (−0.89–−0.05) | 0.029 | −0.60 | (−0.96–−0.25) | 0.001 | 0.50 | (−0.04, 1.03) | 0.068 | −0.08 | (−0.55–0.40) | 0.748 |
| Species | Site | Parameters of Concentration | Zn | Cd | Hg | Pb | HI | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C [mg·kg−1 f.m.] | ADD | HQ | C [mg·kg−1 f.m.] | ADD | HQ | C [mg·kg−1 f.m.] | ADD | HQ | C [mg·kg−1 f.m.] | ADD | HQ | ||||
| SLG | Industrial | Mean | 9.63 | 0.00076 | 0.00252 | 0.17 | 0.00001 | 0.01300 | 0.19 | 0.00001 | 0.04941 | 0.19 | 0.00001 | 0.00412 | 0.069 |
| Max | 57.66 | 0.00453 | 0.01510 | 0.52 | 0.00004 | 0.04070 | 0.50 | 0.00004 | 0.13095 | 1.88 | 0.00015 | 0.04112 | 0.228 | ||
| Non-industrial | Mean | 7.10 | 0.00056 | 0.00186 | 0.28 | 0.00002 | 0.02187 | 0.02 | 0.000001 | 0.00496 | 0.19 | 0.00001 | 0.00404 | 0.033 | |
| Max | 15.67 | 0.00123 | 0.00410 | 0.68 | 0.00005 | 0.05343 | 0.04 | 0.000003 | 0.00927 | 0.24 | 0.00002 | 0.00524 | 0.072 | ||
| LS | Industrial | Mean | 8.93 | 0.00070 | 0.00234 | 0.36 | 0.00003 | 0.02789 | <LOQ | - | - | 0.22 | 0.00002 | 0.00480 | 0.035 |
| Max | 11.97 | 0.00094 | 0.00314 | 0.40 | 0.00003 | 0.03143 | <LOQ | - | - | 0.30 | 0.00002 | 0.00655 | 0.041 | ||
| Non-industrial | Mean | 11.25 | 0.00088 | 0.00295 | 0.16 | 0.00001 | 0.01278 | 0.01 | 0.000001 | 0.00290 | <LOQ | - | - | 0.019 | |
| Max | 17.41 | 0.00137 | 0.00456 | 0.24 | 0.00002 | 0.01855 | 0.02 | 0.000001 | 0.00412 | <LOQ | - | - | 0.027 | ||
| XCS | Industrial | Mean | 28.53 | 0.00224 | 0.00747 | 3.12 | 0.00025 | 0.24510 | 0.05 | 0.000004 | 0.01324 | 0.71 | 0.00006 | 0.01539 | 0.281 |
| Max | 77.40 | 0.00608 | 0.02027 | 6.57 | 0.00052 | 0.51606 | 0.20 | 0.00002 | 0.05212 | 1.95 | 0.00015 | 0.04247 | 0.631 | ||
| Non-industrial | Mean | 15.00 | 0.00118 | 0.00393 | 0.58 | 0.00005 | 0.04544 | 0.05 | 0.000004 | 0.01292 | 0.33 | 0.00003 | 0.00713 | 0.069 | |
| Max | 25.34 | 0.00199 | 0.00664 | 1.31 | 0.00010 | 0.10298 | 0.13 | 0.00001 | 0.03379 | 0.64 | 0.00005 | 0.01397 | 0.157 | ||
| Species | Site | Parameters of Concentration | Zn | Cd | Hg | Pb | HI | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C [mg·kg−1 f.m.] | ADD | HQ | C [mg·kg−1 f.m.] | ADD | HQ | C [mg·kg−1 f.m.] | ADD | HQ | C [mg·kg−1 f.m.] | ADD | HQ | ||||
| SLG | Industrial | Mean | 9.63 | 0.01320 | 0.04401 | 0.17 | 0.00023 | 0.22687 | 0.19 | 0.00026 | 0.86248 | 0.19 | 0.00026 | 0.07187 | 1.205 |
| Max | 57.66 | 0.07908 | 0.26359 | 0.52 | 0.00071 | 0.71040 | 0.50 | 0.00069 | 2.28571 | 1.88 | 0.00258 | 0.71771 | 3.977 | ||
| Non-industrial | Mean | 7.10 | 0.00974 | 0.03246 | 0.28 | 0.00038 | 0.38181 | 0.02 | 0.00003 | 0.08655 | 0.19 | 0.00025 | 0.07048 | 0.571 | |
| Max | 15.67 | 0.02149 | 0.07163 | 0.68 | 0.00093 | 0.93257 | 0.04 | 0.00005 | 0.16174 | 0.24 | 0.00033 | 0.09143 | 1.257 | ||
| LS | Industrial | Mean | 8.93 | 0.01224 | 0.04080 | 0.36 | 0.00049 | 0.48686 | <LOQ | - | - | 0.22 | 0.00030 | 0.08381 | 0.611 |
| Max | 11.97 | 0.01642 | 0.05472 | 0.40 | 0.00055 | 0.54857 | <LOQ | - | - | 0.30 | 0.00041 | 0.11429 | 0.718 | ||
| Non-industrial | Mean | 11.25 | 0.01543 | 0.05143 | 0.16 | 0.00022 | 0.22310 | 0.01 | 0.00002 | 0.05069 | <LOQ | - | - | 0.325 | |
| Max | 17.41 | 0.02388 | 0.07961 | 0.24 | 0.00032 | 0.32384 | 0.02 | 0.00002 | 0.07197 | <LOQ | - | - | 0.475 | ||
| XCS | Industrial | Mean | 28.53 | 0.03912 | 0.13041 | 3.12 | 0.00428 | 4.27817 | 0.05 | 0.00007 | 0.23116 | 0.71 | 0.00097 | 0.26860 | 4.908 |
| Max | 77.40 | 0.10615 | 0.35383 | 6.57 | 0.00901 | 9.00754 | 0.20 | 0.00027 | 0.90971 | 1.95 | 0.00267 | 0.74133 | 11.012 | ||
| Non-industrial | Mean | 15.00 | 0.02057 | 0.06855 | 0.58 | 0.00079 | 0.79308 | 0.05 | 0.00007 | 0.22544 | 0.33 | 0.00045 | 0.12444 | 1.212 | |
| Max | 25.34 | 0.03475 | 0.11584 | 1.31 | 0.00180 | 1.79745 | 0.13 | 0.00018 | 0.58971 | 0.64 | 0.00088 | 0.24381 | 2.747 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Rusin, M.; Domagalska, J.; Czendlik, A.; Wróbel, N.; Kidoń, A. Spatial Variation in Cd, Pb, Hg, and Zn Accumulation in Edible Wild-Growing Mushroom Species from Different Environmentally Loaded Areas in Southern Poland: Risk Assessment and Implications for Consumer Safety. Toxics 2026, 14, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010036
Rusin M, Domagalska J, Czendlik A, Wróbel N, Kidoń A. Spatial Variation in Cd, Pb, Hg, and Zn Accumulation in Edible Wild-Growing Mushroom Species from Different Environmentally Loaded Areas in Southern Poland: Risk Assessment and Implications for Consumer Safety. Toxics. 2026; 14(1):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010036
Chicago/Turabian StyleRusin, Monika, Joanna Domagalska, Agnieszka Czendlik, Natalia Wróbel, and Anna Kidoń. 2026. "Spatial Variation in Cd, Pb, Hg, and Zn Accumulation in Edible Wild-Growing Mushroom Species from Different Environmentally Loaded Areas in Southern Poland: Risk Assessment and Implications for Consumer Safety" Toxics 14, no. 1: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010036
APA StyleRusin, M., Domagalska, J., Czendlik, A., Wróbel, N., & Kidoń, A. (2026). Spatial Variation in Cd, Pb, Hg, and Zn Accumulation in Edible Wild-Growing Mushroom Species from Different Environmentally Loaded Areas in Southern Poland: Risk Assessment and Implications for Consumer Safety. Toxics, 14(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010036

