You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Foods
  • Review
  • Open Access

18 November 2021

Toxic Metals in Wild Ungulates and Domestic Meat Animals Slaughtered for Food Purposes: A Systemic Review

,
and
1
Department of Environmental Health, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
2
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa
3
Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Game Meat and Game Meat Products: Safety, Quality and Consumer Perception

Abstract

The presence of toxic metals in harvested game meat is a cause for concern for public health and meat safety in general. Authorities and food safety agencies continue to develop guidelines and limits of the maximum allowable levels of toxic metals in food products. However, the situation is different for game meat products in developing countries, where a number of shortcomings have been identified. This includes a lack of game meat animal slaughter regulations, specific species’ product limits that have not yet been established and the continued use of hunting or game meat animals’ harvesting plans that could introduce the same toxic metals of concern. This review was conducted from English literature published between 2011 and 2021; it highlights the possible health effects and the shortcomings in the implementation of game meat safety production strategies for toxic metals (Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium and Mercury) in game meat animal production. Lead (Pb) remains the most significant threat for toxic metals contamination in game meat animals and the slaughter processes. In most developing countries, including in South Africa, the monitoring and control of these heavy metals in the game meat value chain has not yet been implemented.

1. Introduction

Worldwide, the shortage of protein sources as well as the high cost of red meat has contributed to the search for a sustainable supply of new sources of protein [1,2]. Ciobanu and Munteanu [3] state that at the turn of the century, the overabundance of game meat animals led to the identification of game as a possible future source of animal protein. Although game meat is a good source of protein, by nature of its killing and harvesting, it can lead to possible safety hazards that need to be controlled before such meat can be released for consumption by consumers and other carnivore animals [4,5,6,7,8]. While the welfare of the animal during the killing is always considered, compliance to food safety regulations is important [9]. Worldwide, the occurrence and existence of toxic metals in meat and its control remains a concern for authorities. Some of these toxic metals are naturally occurring in the environment, while others are introduced by processes of animal farming, industrial activity, urbanisation and mining [10,11]. Researchers concluded that the presence of toxic metals in meat must be investigated and controlled to ensure the safety of the meat products [12,13,14,15]. Several studies identified Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), Mercury (Hg) and Arsenic (As) as leading game meat contaminants in terms of toxic metals [3]. Some of these toxic metals, such as lead (Pb), occur naturally in the environment in rocks, soil and the hydrosphere [16], while lead from contaminated foliage could contribute considerably to bioaccumulation in the meat of animals grazing there [17]. These risks could be identified and controlled by following good agricultural practices, such as ensuring that animals are not exposed to toxic metals during farming, improved farm management systems and water testing, feed protection from contamination and the selection of uncontaminated areas to keep game animals [18,19,20]. However, the control of these risks by means of good agricultural practices becomes challenging when game/bush meat is sourced via nonregulated (illegal) methods from non-farming systems, such as conservancies or bush/forests. It is important to note that the distribution of arsenic (As) is generally by natural processes; however, anthropogenic pollution is generally caused by mining, smelting activities, glass manufacturing, use of pesticides and preservatives that have traces of arsenic [13,20].

General Health Effects of Toxic Metals

The consensus is that once these toxic metals are in high concentrations in the body, more adverse health effects can be expected [8,11]. While different exposure routes exist, ingestion and inhalation of high concentrations remain the most detrimental form of exposure [21]. Toxic metals, once ingested, tend to affect the major organs of the body due to bioaccumulation [21,22,23]. The body’s ability to excrete toxic metals is generally slower than the intake, thus leading to excessive toxic accumulation of these metals in the body [11,24]. Kamunda and Mathuthu [20] state that some of the long-term health impacts of over-accumulation by these metals may include carcinogenic effects, central and peripheral nervous system damage and blood circulatory effects.
The risk is no different with game/wild/bush meat, where the presence of these toxic metals in the meat continues to be a concern for authorities [25,26]. Confirmed by Falandysz and Szymczyk–Kobrzyńska [10] and Irschik and Wanek [12], some of the toxic metals found in harvested game meat could have been introduced by different game meat killing, hunting or harvesting methods. Similarly, other researchers [14,15,16] have documented the accumulative presence of trace metal elements in meat animals and have highlighted the need to ensure proper screening, monitoring and testing of meat products to ensure their compliance. Taggart and Reglero [27] noted that globally, developed countries have responded to the possible threat of the over-consumption of toxic metals by regulating the concentrations of toxic metals permissible in different food types, including meat. These limits include the cumulative concentration in the final products [10,26,28]. However, the situation could be different in developing regions/areas where mining activities, anthropogenic activities and different hunting and harvesting methods of game meat animals are adopted, as there is a probability of toxic metal traces being found in higher concentrations in food/s of animal origin [20,29]. This is worsened by the fact that generally preferred hunting bullets are made of lead and zinc [30]. Researchers Taylor et al. [5], Doabi et al. [18] and Kamunda et al. [20] noted that toxic metals in bullets can contaminate carcasses, especially around the bullet entry and exit points on the carcasses, thus increasing the meat safety risks of game meat. This then leads to unavoidable contamination of game meat animals during killing processes, especially when bullets made from lead (Pb) are used [31]. In many developing countries, the selection of bullets is left to the hunter; thus, in most cases, lead-made bullets are generally used as they are cheaper [26,32]. The European Union member states have recognized the threat from lead-containing bullets when used in hunting and are in the process of drafting regulations around the use of such bullets; these regulations have been reviewed in 2020 [33].
Figure 1 illustrates the health effects likely to develop in different systems of a human body due to excessive exposure to toxic metals.
Figure 1. Human health effects of exposure to toxic metals. Figure developed from information sourced in [21,22,23,34].
Researchers Fowler et al. [20], Prashanth et al. [21], Mudgal et al. [23] and Durkalec et al. [24] agreed that some of the health effects of toxic metals as a result of the consumption of contaminated game meat could be long lasting and even have a negative effect on the development of babies. Some of the listed effects included increased child mortalities, reduced IQ and reduced reading and learning capabilities. While these effects were generally linked with exposed parents, the risks of developing cancer remain real in exposed adults [13,25]. This review highlights the need for a clear assessment and monitoring of the four toxic metals of interest (Lead, Cadmium, Mercury and Arsenic) in the game meat industry/supply chain, thus addressing the current lack of knowledge and research linked to the provision of safe game meat hunting or harvesting plans.

2. Materials and Methods

Due to a paucity of data on toxic metal contamination of game meat conducted in Africa, it was important for the purpose of this review that articles across the globe were included. This review was comprehended from English scholarly literature published in Science Direct, Google scholar and PubMed between 2011 and 2021, to ensure only recent information was included in the review. However, information pre-2011 was included in the introduction and discussions of the paper. Figure 2 describes the search strategy (adopted from http://www.prisma-statement.org/, accessed on 12 October 2020) used to identify relevant articles to be included in this review. The key search terms used were “Game Meat OR Toxic metals OR Lead (Pb) OR Arsenic (As) OR Cadmium (Cd) OR Mercury (Hg) AND Africa OR Europe OR South America OR North America OR Asia OR Australia OR Antarctica”. To assist with guidelines and standards, grey material from the websites of the Codex Alimentarius Commission (FAO), (www.fao.org, accessed on 3 November 2021), The Food Safety (European Commission) European Union (https://ec.europa.eu/food/overview_en, accessed on 17 November 2020) and the U.S. Food and Drugs Administration (www.fda.gov, accessed on 17 November 2020) were also searched for the latest update regarding the control and monitoring of toxic metals in food, with a focus on red meat products.
Figure 2. Methodology of search followed during the review process (available from: http://www.prisma-statement.org, accessed on 12 October 2020).
Records without a specific reference to toxic metals in wild animals and game meat, studies in languages other than English and postgraduate theses were excluded from this study as they did not relay to the objective of the study. Tables were created reflecting the aim, global legal limits and the findings and recommendations made by previous researchers.

3. Results

Although there is lack of sufficient data that addresses game meat animal species, the guidelines and standards set for maximum limits of toxic metals permissible in red meat from different countries and regions are depicted in Table 1. From the searched guidelines, it was clear that most developing countries were using the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) guidelines to control toxic metals presence in food products, including meat.
Table 1. Maximum limits for toxic metals in red meat products (presented in mg/kg).
Table 2 provides a summary of toxic metal studies conducted on meat animal products between 2011 and 2021 and their recommendations, taking into consideration the concentrations of the four most significant toxic metals (Pb, Cd, As and Hg).
Table 2. Summary of studies conducted in toxic metals in red meat including game meat between 2011 and 2021.
Table 2 shows that studies were widespread across the globe and that developed countries contributed to most of the studies. For the search period of 2011 and 2021, countries where studies were done globally included Argentina (1), Australia (2), Canada (3), China (1), a combined study for EU countries (1), Germany (1) Hungary (2), Iran (3), Kuwait (1), Mexico (2), Namibia (1), New Zealand (1), Nigeria (3), Norway (1), Pakistan (1), Poland (6), Russia (1), Serbia (1), Slovakia (1), Spain (2), Sweden (1), Turkey (2), United Kingdom (2) and the United States of America (2). Most of the studies conducted were on game meat animals and general meat products; the most investigated toxic metals were Lead, Cadmium, Mercury and Arsenic. The general consensus was that the occurrences of toxic metals in meat animals and their meat could be contributed to by numerous factors, such as environmental contamination, feeds, water and the selection of a game meat animal killing methods utilised for the different game species.

4. Discussion

The presence of toxic metals in high concentrations could be dangerous to the environment and, subsequently, to the meat animal and, later, to consumers [23]. As stated by Mudgal and Madaan [23], Kanstrup and Thomas [33] and El-Kady and Abdel-Wahhab [36], in Figure 1, with extensive exposure, a significant number of health effects have been recorded. These health effects were observed in people traditionally reliant on game meat hunting and traditional foods [34,44]. Developed and some developing regions have set maximum limits of toxic metals in red meat products (Table 1). However, products of game meat origin are not included in the lists. This is a shortfall as it is widely known that game meat animals are mostly raised in the field, and their slaughter processes, by their nature, could introduce some hazards [81,82]. To add on top of these risks, some of the processes of game meat harvesting could be directly linked with the introduction of toxic metals such as Lead, Arsenic, Cadmium and Mercury in meat animals [24,83,84]
The greatest risk comes from the use of bullets made from lead, as these bullets tend to fragment and disperse across the harvested game animals, a situation that causes a wide distribution of physical and toxic metals contaminates in carcasses [48,85]. Figure 3 depicts x-rays of the spread of pellets in the head (left image) and along the lower neck, brisket and shoulder (right image) of impala (Aepyceros melampus) that were culled from a helicopter using a shotgun during commercial harvesting of game meat in South Africa.
Figure 3. Impala head (left) and impala neck (right) showing the spread of shotgun lead bullets fired from a helicopter during a commercial harvest. R = Picture taken from the right side when facing the animal.
Table 1 confirms that lead (Pb) concentrations greater than 0.10 Mg/Kg in meat products are considered dangerous, and meat products with concentrations greater than this must not be passed as safe for human and animal consumption [11,35,39]. The possible banning of lead bullets for game meat hunting is the most possible form of lead from bullets control [18,70,71]. The more a bullet fragments, the greater is the risk of spreading contamination to areas that were not initially contaminated. Using radiographic material and imaging, researchers showed that the selection of a bullet and the control or enforcement of its usage could be an effective control of Pb contamination caused by bullets in meat carcasses [71]. Lead has long been the preferred metal for constructing bullets due to its ability to expand upon hitting the target, thereby creating the hydrostatic shockwave required to create instant death. The hunting fraternity are changing from lead bullets to alternatives that are made of either 100% copper or copper alloys (95% Cu and 5% Zn); these bullets have the same or higher hydrostatic shock by unfolding when striking the target, but not breaking into pieces as lead bullets do.
In some of the studies documented in Table 2 on birds, the Pb poisoning was not only attributed to Pb from bullets/pellets, but also from birds consuming the spent pellets that were found to be lying on the ground/in the water bodies that the birds habituated, and this could be attributed to bioaccumulation [5,72]. These birds of prey and other predator animals could be utilized to indicate the levels of toxic metals in the surrounding areas [48,64,65]. An interesting report has also been published where cheetah during a rehabilitation phase died from Pb poisoning caused by the consumption of Guinea fowl killed with a shotgun, thus highlighting the eminent risk of secondary contamination of birds of prey or other predators/scavengers [86].
Arsenic (As) is also found on bullets and can be transferred to meat during hunting [49,58]. Its limit is also regulated in various countries where 1.0 mg/kg is the maximum permissible level in a red meat product (Table 1) [35]. In general, the choice of hunting bullets is important in the prevention of arsenic contamination of game meat animals [77].
Cadmium (Cd) is introduced to the environment through natural and man-made processes [13,87]. Game meat animals could be contaminated from eating contaminated grass around their habitats and thus transferring Cd to consumers and other scavenging animals [26,88]. Different countries and food safety organisations have regulated the amount and concentration of Cd in food products and, thus, control the distribution of the contaminated or suspected product (Table 1).
Mercury is ubiquitous in the environment and can be introduced by anthropogenic activities such as mining, agriculture and industrial areas [26]. Once meat animals are exposed to a contaminated area during grazing and general game-farming practices, traces of mercury could be ingested by the meat animal [30,89]. In developed countries, the levels of Mercury (Hg) in excess of 0.01 mg/kg in food including meat products is considered dangerous for consumption (Table 1), while other countries have no mercury limits in their food products [13]. This is because Mercury (Hg) is toxic, even in trace elements (although the mercury species differ in their toxicity, it is more toxic when in its organic form, with methylHg being more toxic than EthylHg) [90], and its presence in food must be monitored at all times [91]. Studies suggest that the environmental monitoring and control of processes linked with the harvesting of game meat can bring about control in the concentration of mercury in game meat products [14,77].
Despite the findings made by researchers on the presence of toxic metals in meat animals, meat and meat products, the adoption of the recommendations by stakeholders and role-players has been slow. From Table 2 above, the recommendations made can be summarised as follows:
  • “One Health” concepts: According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) (www.who.org, accessed on 10 June 2021), “One Health is an approach to designing and implementing programs, policies, legislation and research in which multiple sectors communicate and work together to achieve better public health outcomes” [78]. The adoption of these concepts in the production of meat provides a structured way of investigating meat safety risks [92,93].
  • Stakeholder’s involvement: Studies by Shrivastava and Shrivastava [94] and Duc and Toribio [95] concluded that when different stakeholders are identified or identifiable, information generally flows efficiently within different categories. This information could be for training purposes, ideas sharing and early warning systems to identify changes in contamination levels in the environment [96].
  • Good Agricultural Practices (GAP): With the adoption of meat safety strategies during meat animals farming, a better foundation of toxic identification exists [97]. The same is applicable to game farming and the production of meat animals ready for slaughter. Measures such as compliance of feed, water and medication used; detoxification of industrial effluents before being released to the environments and monitoring of toxic metals in meat animals must be put in place to facilitate the process of meat animals production [98].
  • Enforcement: Law enforcement would entail environmental pollution control, hunting and slaughter/processing control and the banning of generally used products with high concentration of toxic metals (e.g., fuel, paint) but, specifically, lead bullets and pellets used for hunting. This will ensure that secondary contamination of meat animals by these products is minimised [99,100].
  • Bio-indicators: Environmental monitoring of toxic metals by using animals and plants as bio-indicators is an effective method of environmental pollution monitoring [101]. The concentration of toxic metals of interest could be found on leaves, plants, feathers, fur and skin of other animals [102,103]. The presence of specific plants in an ecosystem could be used to indicate toxic metals contamination in the environment [104].
  • Risk assessment: Risk assessment from farm to fork could be the best tool to be used for the identification, evaluation and control of food hazards in a food supply chain [99,105]. The situation is no different for the game meat production systems and food safety hazards such as toxic metals must be controlled at farms, killing, slaughter and dressing processes and preparation by consumers [106]. For example, Food Safety Management Systems, such as ISO 22000 [9], require that suppliers of raw materials (including live animals sent for slaughter) must provide information such as risks to an extent that it will allow the next entity in the supply chain to conduct a hazard analysis.
  • Monitoring: Similar to enforcement, monitoring of the presence and concentration of these toxic metals must be done to facilitate the detection levels of toxic metals in the environment (soil, vegetation, water and meat products) [107,108]. It is also a requirement of ISO 22000, the Codex Alimentarius standards, European Food Safety Authority and the United States Food and Drug Administration [36,38,39] that toxic metals hazards must be monitored at all times during food production. Known levels of toxic metals will assist with controls and decisions that need to be made to ensure safe meat [53,109]. While these could be done by different governments, industries must also play a significant role in developing monitoring systems.
  • Further research: Wild angulate meat animals must be further researched as a means of ensuring that meat from these animals meet the requirements to be certified safe for human consumption [104]. Strategies employable to reduce meat contamination from toxic metals must be developed; these may include the promotion of the “One Health” approach in meat production from farm to fork [110].

5. Conclusions

Across the globe, there is sufficient evidence that confirms the presence of toxic metals in game and game meat, whilst there are no regulations/guidelines limiting the levels of toxic metals in meat produced for human and animal consumption. This situation leaves food authorities, consumers and governments vulnerable, and the situation cannot be overlooked. While toxic metals limits are documented for red (livestock) meat, fish and poultry meat, game meat has lagged behind. It is therefore important that game meat regulations are equally developed; these regulations must include the limits of toxic metals, especially in regions where game/bush meat is readily consumed. However, in implementing control measures, there are numerous obstacles to overcome. These may include a lack of funds to develop environmental monitoring and implementation of toxic metal management systems at farm levels, so concerted efforts to reduce the occurrence and introduction of toxic metals in meat from farm to fork is needed. The research recommendations that will influence control strategies mainly provide for a One Health Approach, stakeholder’s involvement, good agricultural practices, enforcement, use of bio-indicators, risk assessment, monitoring, awareness programs and further research. It is clear that more research is needed globally, but especially in regions which rely on game meat as a major source of protein.

Author Contributions

D.V.N. conducted the research as part of his Doctorate degree in Environmental Health. This study was supervised by J.L.B. and L.C.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) and partly funded by the South African Department of Science and Technology (UID number: 84633), as administered by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa, and partly by the Department of Trade and Industry’s THRIP program (THRIP/64/19/04/2017), with Wildlife Ranching South Africa as partner, and by Stellenbosch University. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are that of the author(s), and the National Research Foundation does not accept any liability in this regard.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hoffman, L.C.; Wiklund, E. Game and venison–meat for the modern consumer. Meat Sci. 2006, 74, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. White, P.A.; Belant, J.L. Provisioning of Game Meat to Rural Communities as a Benefit of Sport Hunting in Zambia. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ciobanu, M.M.; Munteanu, M.; Postolache, A.N.; Boișteanu, P.C. Toxic heavy metals content in wild boar and venison meat: A brief review. Sci. Pap. Ser. D Anim. Sci. Int. Session Sci. Commun. Fac. Anim. Sci. 2020, 63, 1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hoffman, L.C. Game as an alternative protein source, feed science. AFMA Matrix 2016, 25, 54–55. [Google Scholar]
  5. Taylor, A.; Lindsey, P.; Davies-Mostert, H.; Goodman, P. An assessment of the economic, social and conservation value of the wildlife ranching industry and its potential to support the green economy in South Africa. Endanger. Wildl. Trust Johannesbg. 2016. Available online: https://www.sagreenfund.org.za/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/EWT-Research-report.pdf (accessed on 12 November 2020).
  6. Niewiadomska, K.; Kosicka-Gębska, M.; Gębski, J.; Gutkowska, K.; Jeżewska-Zychowicz, M.; Sułek, M. Game Meat Consumption—Conscious Choice or Just a Game? Foods 2020, 9, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bekker, J.L.; Hoffman, L.C.; Jooste, P.J. Essential food safety management points in the supply chain of game meat in South Africa. In Game Meat Hygiene in Focus; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 39–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nkosi, D.V.; Bekker, J.L.; Hoffman, L.C. The Use of Organic Acids (Lactic and Acetic) as a Microbial Decontaminant during the Slaughter of Meat Animal Species: A Review. Foods 2021, 10, 2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chen, H.; Liu, S.; Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; Yang, H.; Chen, Y. Food safety management systems based on ISO 22000:2018 methodology of hazard analysis compared to ISO 22000:2005. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 2019, 25, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Falandysz, J.; Szymczyk–Kobrzyńska, K.; Brzostowski, A.; Zalewski, K.; Zasadowski, A. Concentrations of heavy metals in the tissues of red deer (Cervus elaphus) from the region of Warmia and Mazury, Poland. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). Contaminants and Natural Toxicants Federal Register of Legislative Instruments; Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ): Kingston, Australia; Wellington, New Zealand, 2015.
  12. Irschik, I.; Wanek, C.; Bauer, F.; Sager, M.; Paulsen, P. 31. Composition of bullets used for hunting and food safety considerations. In Trends in Game Meat Hygiene; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bosch, A.C.; O’Neill, B.; Sigge, G.O.; Kerwath, S.E.; Hoffman, L.C. Heavy metals in marine fish meat and consumer health: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marrugo-Negrete, J.; Pinedo-Hernández, J.; Díez, S. Assessment of heavy metal pollution, spatial distribution and origin in agricultural soils along the Sinú River Basin, Colombia. Environ. Res. 2017, 154, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lü, J.; Jiao, W.-B.; Qiu, H.-Y.; Chen, B.; Huang, X.-X.; Kang, B. Origin and spatial distribution of heavy metals and carcinogenic risk assessment in mining areas at You’xi County southeast China. Geoderma 2018, 310, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Levin, R.; Vieira, C.L.Z.; Mordarski, D.C.; Rosenbaum, M.H. Lead seasonality in humans, animals, and the natural environment. Environ. Res. 2020, 180, 108797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Altarez, R.D.D.; Sedigo, N.A. Existing land use and extent of lead (Pb) contamination in the grazing food chain of the closed Carmona sanitary landfill in the Philippines. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cooper, S.M.; Van der Merwe, M. Game ranching for meat production in marginal African agricultural lands. J. Arid Land Stud. 2014, 24, 249–252. [Google Scholar]
  19. Doabi, S.A.; Karami, M.; Afyuni, M.; Yeganeh, M. Pollution and health risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soil, atmospheric dust and major food crops in Kermanshah province, Iran. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 163, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kamunda, C.; Mathuthu, M.; Madhuku, M. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Soils from Witwatersrand Gold Mining Basin, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fowler, B.A.; Alexander, J.; Oskarsson, A. Toxic metals in food. In Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 123–140. [Google Scholar]
  22. Prashanth, L.; Kattapagari, K.K.; Chitturi, R.; Baddam, V.R.; Prasad, L. A review on role of essential trace elements in health and disease. J. Dr. NTR Univ. Health Sci. 2015, 4, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mudgal, V.; Madaan, N.; Mudgal, A.; Singh, R.; Mishra, S. Effect of toxic metals on human health. Open Nutraceuticals J. 2010, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Durkalec, M.; Szkoda, J.; Kolacz, R.; Opalinski, S.; Nawrocka, A.; Zmudzki, J. Bioaccumulation of Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in Roe Deer and Wild Boars from Areas with Different Levels of Toxic Metal Pollution. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2015, 9, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adejumo, O.E.; Fasinu, P.S.; Odion, J.E.; Silva, B.O.; Fajemirokun, T.O. High Cadmium Levels in Cured Meat Products Marketed in Nigeria—Implications for Public Health. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2016, 17, 1933–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gerofke, A.; Martin, A.; Schlichting, D.; Gremse, C.; Müller-Graf, C. Heavy metals in game meat. In Chemical Hazards in Foods of Animal Origin; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 435–439. [Google Scholar]
  27. Taggart, M.A.; Reglero, M.M.; Camarero, P.R.; Mateo, R. Should legislation regarding maximum Pb and Cd levels in human food also cover large game meat? Environ. Int. 2011, 37, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Phillips, L. Bringing more South African game meat to dinner tables. Farmer’s Wkly. 2019, 19031, 30–32. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fan, Y.; Zhu, T.; Li, M.; He, J.; Huang, R. Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil and Brown Rice and Human Health Risk Assessment near Three Mining Areas in Central China. J. Health Eng. 2017, 2017, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Szkoda, J.; Durkalec, M.; Kołacz, R.; Opaliński, S.; Żmudzki, J. Content of cadmium, lead and mercury in the tissues of game animals. Med. Weter. 2012, 68, 689–692. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mateo, R.; Kanstrup, N. Regulations on lead ammunition adopted in Europe and evidence of compliance. Ambio 2019, 48, 989–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dobrowolska, A.; Melosik, M. Bullet-derived lead in tissues of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) and red deer (Cervus elaphus). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2007, 54, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kanstrup, N.; Thomas, V.G. Transitioning to lead-free ammunition use in hunting: Socio-economic and regulatory considerations for the European Union and other jurisdictions. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2020, 32, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Juric, A.K.; Batal, M.; David, W.; Sharp, D.; Schwartz, H.; Ing, A.; Fediuk, K.; Black, A.; Tikhonov, C.; Chan, H.M. A total diet study and probabilistic assessment risk assessment of dietary mercury exposure among First Nations living on-reserve in Ontario, Canada. Environ. Res. 2017, 158, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Department of Health, Minister of Health, Government of South Africa. Department of Health. Food Stuff, Cosmetics and Disinfactant Act. (Act. 54 of 1972): Regulations Relating to Maximum Levels of Metals in Food; Department of Health, Minister of Health, Government of South Africa: Pretoria, South Africa, 2018.
  36. European Food Safety Authority. Laying Down the General Principles and Requirements of Food Law, Establishing the European Food Safety Authority and Laying Down Procedures in Matters of Food Safety; European Food Safety Authority: Parma, Italy, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ministry of Health, People’s Republic of China. National Food Safety Standard: Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Food, GB2762-2012; Ministry of Health, People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2013.
  38. United States Food and Drugs Administration, FDA. Potential Hazards Associated with the Manufacturing, Processing, Packing, and Holding of Human Food. In Food Safety in the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; United States Food and Drugs Administration, FDA: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  39. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  40. Uhart, M.; del Valle Ferreyra, H.; Romano, M.; Muchiutti, A.; Alzuagaray, S.; Santiago, M.; Caselli, A. Lead pollution from hunting ammunition in Argentina and current state of lead shot replacement efforts. Ambio 2019, 48, 1015–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. MacLachlan, D.; Budd, K.; Connolly, J.; Derrick, J.; Penrose, L.; Tobin, T. Arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, selenium and zinc concentrations in liver, kidney and muscle in Australian sheep. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2016, 50, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hampton, J.O.; Laidlaw, M.; Buenz, E.; Arnemo, J.M. Heads in the sand: Public health and ecological risks of lead-based bullets for wildlife shooting in Australia. Wildl. Res. 2018, 45, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bond, A.L.; Robertson, G.; Lavers, J.L.; Hobson, K.A.; Ryan, P.C. Trace element concentrations in harvested auks from Newfoundland: Toxicological risk of a traditional hunt. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 115, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Laird, B.D.; Chan, H.M. Bioaccessibility of metals in fish, shellfish, wild game, and seaweed harvested in British Columbia, Canada. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 58, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Legagneux, P.; Suffice, P.; Messier, J.-S.; Lelievre, F.; Tremblay, J.A.; Maisonneuve, C.; Saint-Louis, R.; Bêty, J. High Risk of Lead Contamination for Scavengers in an Area with High Moose Hunting Success. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ballová, Z.; Janiga, M.; Hančinský, R. Comparison of Element Concentrations (Ba, Mn, Pb, Sr, Zn) in the Bones and Teeth of Wild Ruminants from the West Carpathians and the Tian-Shan Mountains as Indicators of Air Pollution. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thomas, V.G.; Pain, D.J.; Kanstrup, N.; Green, R.E. Setting maximum levels for lead in game meat in EC regulations: An adjunct to replacement of lead ammunition. Ambio 2020, 49, 2026–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Trinogga, A.L.; Courtiol, A.; Krone, O. Fragmentation of lead-free and lead-based hunting rifle bullets under real life hunting conditions in Germany. Ambio 2019, 48, 1056–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Grúz, A.; Mackle, O.; Bartha, A.; Szabó, R.; Déri, J.; Budai, P.; Lehel, J. Biomonitoring of toxic metals in feathers of predatory birds from eastern regions of Hungary. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 26324–26331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lehel, J.; Laczay, P.; Gyurcsó, A.; Jánoska, F.; Majoros, S.; Lányi, K.; Marosán, M. Toxic heavy metals in the muscle of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)—food toxicological significance. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 4465–4472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sinkakarimi, M.H.; Pourkhabbaz, A.R.; Hassanpour, M.; Levengood, J.M.; Ghasempouri, S.M. Potential human health risk assessment of heavy metals in the flesh of mallard and pochard in the South Eastern Caspian Sea region of Iran. J. Adv. Environ. Health Res. 2015, 3, 139–145. [Google Scholar]
  52. Determination of chromium, lead and cadmium levels in edible organs of marketed chickens in Mashhad, Iran. J. Food Qual. Hazards Control. 2015, 2, 134–138.
  53. Hashemi, M.; Salehi, T.; Aminzare, M.; Raeisi, M.; Afshari, A. Contamination of toxic heavy metals in various foods in Iran: A review. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2017, 9, 1692–1697. [Google Scholar]
  54. Abd-ElGhany, S.M.; Mohammed, M.A.; Abdelkhalek, A.; Saad, F.S.S.; Sallam, K.I. Health Risk Assessment of Exposure to Heavy Metals from Sheep Meat and Offal in Kuwait. J. Food Prot. 2020, 83, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Adán, E.-G.; Gerardo, G.-B. Lead Concentrations in Sediments and Blue-Winged Teals (Anas discors) From El Palmar State Reserve, Yucatan, Mexico. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2013, 65, 588–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hiller, B.J.; Barclay, J.S. Concentrations of Heavy Metals in American Woodcock Harvested in Connecticut. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2011, 60, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Magwedere, K.; Shimwino, J.; Hemberger, Y.; Hoffman, L.; Midzi, E.; Dziva, F. Lead and cadmium levels in liver, kidney and muscle of harvested wild springbok (Antidorcus marsupialis) under extensive management in southern and southeastern Namibia. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 2013, 43, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bekhit, A.E.-D.; Al-Amer, S.; Gooneratne, R.; Mason, S.L.; Osman, K.A.; Clucas, L. Concentrations of trace elementals and organochlorines in Mutton bird (Puffinus griseus). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 1742–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Abel, E. Evaluation of Some Heavy Metals’ Concentration Levels in Fresh and Smoke-Dried Porcupine (Atherur africanus) Meat. EC Nutr. 2016, 4, 927–936. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lucky, L.N.; Temitayo, L.O.; Nwidu, L.L.; Ohemu, T.L. Hematotoxicity status of lead and three other heavy metals in cow slaughtered for human consumption in Jos, Nigeria. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 2017, 9, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  61. Oloruntoba, A.; Nathaniel, I.A. Assessment of Heavy Metal Levels in Offal Meats (Kidney and Liver) of Beef Sold at Gwagwalada Market, Abuja, Nigeria. Asian J. Phys. Chem. Sci. 2019, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hassan, A.E.A. Nutrients and Toxic Elements in Semidomesticated Reindeer in Norway: Nutritional and Food Safety Aspects; UiT Munin: Tromsø, Norway, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  63. Khan, M.A.; Lalarukh, I.; Gaitee, J. Detection of Heavy Metal Contents in Meat and Milk of Buffaloes from area of Ring Road and Kasur Lahore. Appl. Zool. 2016, 96, 41851–41858. [Google Scholar]
  64. Lanocha-Arendarczyk, N.; Kalisinska, E.; Kosik-Bogacka, D.I.; Budis, H.; Podlasinska, J.; Jedrzejewska, E. Mercury levels in raccoons (Procyon lotor) from the Warta Mouth National Park, northwestern Poland. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 159, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  65. Kalisinska, E.; Lanocha-Arendarczyk, N.; Kosik-Bogacka, D.; Budis, H.; Podlasinska, J.; Popiolek, M.; Piróg, A.; Jedrzejewska, E. Brains of Native and Alien Mesocarnivores in Biomonitoring of Toxic Metals in Europe. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kalisinska, E.; Lisowski, P.; Kosik-Bogacka, D.I. Red fox Vulpes vulpes (L.; 1758) as a bioindicator of mercury contamination in terrestrial ecosystems of north-western Poland. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 145, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Felsmann, M.Z.; Szarek, J.; Felsmann, M.; Gulda, D. Lead in game bird meat as a risk to public health: New aspects in the light of physical phenomena generated by a projectile. J. Elem. 2016, 21, 2. [Google Scholar]
  68. Durkalec, M.; Kolenda, R.; Owczarek, T.; Szkoda, J.; Nawrocka, A.; Grzegrzółka, J.; Dzięgiel, P.; Sochae, P.; Kołacz, R.; Schierack, P.; et al. Expression of metallothionein in the liver and kidneys of the red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) from an industrial metal smelting area of Poland. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 137, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Makarov, D.; Komarov, A.; Ovcharenko, V.; Nebera, E.; Kozhushkevich, A.; Kalantaenko, A.; Afanasieva, E.; Demidova, S. Dioxin and Heavy Metals Contamination of Reindeer Offal from Russian Far North Regions. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biol. 2018, 53, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Baloš, M.; Mihaljev, Ž.; Jakšić, S.; Prica, N.; Lazić, G.; Kapetanov, M.; Radulović, J.P. Incidence of Heavy Metals and Other Toxic Elements in Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) Tissues. Arch. Vet. Med. 2015, 2, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gašparík, J.; Binkowski, J.; Jahnátek, A.; Šmehýl, P.; Dobiaš, M.; Lukáč, N.; Błaszczyk, M.; Semla, M.; Massanyi, P. Levels of Metals in Kidney, Liver, and Muscle Tissue and their Influence on the Fitness for the Consumption of Wild Boar from Western Slovakia. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2017, 177, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rodríguez-Estival, J.; Martinez-Haro, M.; Monsalve-González, L.; Mateo, R. Interactions between endogenous and dietary antioxidants against Pb-induced oxidative stress in wild ungulates from a Pb polluted mining area. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 2725–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Romero, D.; de José, A.; Theureau, J.M.; Ferrer, A.; Raigón, M.D.; Torregrosa, J.B. Lead in terrestrial game birds from Spain. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 1585–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wiklund, E.; Malmfors, G. Game Meat as a Resource in Sweden–with Particular Focus on Moose (Alces alces). In Trends in Game Meat Hygiene: From Forest to Fork; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 625–627. [Google Scholar]
  75. Oymak, T.; Ulusoy, H.I.; Hastaoglu, E.; Yılmaz, V.; Yıldırım, Ş. Some Heavy Metal Contents of Various Slaughtered Cattle Tissues in Sivas-Turkey. J. Turk. Chem. Soc. Sect. A Chem. 2017, 4, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Demirbas, Y.; Erduran, N. Concentration of Selected Heavy Metals in Brown Hare (Lepus Europaeus) and Wild Boar (Sus Scrofa) From Central Turkey. Balk. J. Wildl. Res. 2017, 4, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pain, D.J.; Mateo, R.; Green, R.E. Effects of lead from ammunition on birds and other wildlife: A review and update. Ambio 2019, 48, 935–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Green, R.E.; Pain, D.J. Risks to human health from ammunition-derived lead in Europe. Ambio 2019, 48, 954–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Oldenkamp, R.E.; Bryan, A.L., Jr.; Kennamer, R.A.; Leaphart, J.C.; Webster, S.C.; Beasley, J.C. Trace elements and radiocesium in game species near contaminated sites. J. Wildl. Manag. 2017, 81, 1338–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. French, A.; Conway, W.C.; Cañas-Carrell, J.E.; Klein, D.M. Exposure, Effects and Absorption of Lead in American Woodcock (Scolopax minor): A Review. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2017, 99, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Musilova, J.; Árvay, J.; Vollmannova, A.; Toth, T.; Tomas, J. Environmental Contamination by Heavy Metals in Region with Previous Mining Activity. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2016, 97, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Masindi, V.; Muedi, K.L. Environmental Contamination by Heavy Metals. Heavy Met. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Falandysz, J. Some toxic and trace metals in big game hunted in the northern part of Poland in 1987–1991. Sci. Total Environ. 1994, 141, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ertl, K.; Kitzer, R.; Goessler, W. Elemental composition of game meat from Austria. Food Addit. Contam. Part. B 2016, 9, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Department of Health, Minister of Health, Government of South Africa. Regulations Relating to the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point System (HACCP System), Amendment; Department of Health, Minister of Health, Government of South Africa: Pretoria, South Africa, 2018.
  86. North, M.A.; Lane, E.P.; Marnewick, K.; Caldwell, P.; Carlisle, G.; Hoffman, L.C. Suspected lead poisoning in two captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus jubatus) in South Africa, in 2008 and 2013: Case report. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2015, 86, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wennberg, M.; Lundh, T.; Sommar, J.N.; Bergdahl, I.A. Time trends and exposure determinants of lead and cadmium in the adult population of northern Sweden 1990–2014. Environ. Res. 2017, 159, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Eisler, R. Mercury hazards from gold mining to humans, plants, and animals. Reviews of Environmental Contam. Toxicol. 2004, 181, 139–198. [Google Scholar]
  89. Guynup, S.; Safina, B. Mercury: Sources in the environment, health effects, and politics. Blue Ocean. Inst. 2012, 1, 7–54. [Google Scholar]
  90. Solang, M.; Lamondo, D.; Kumaji, S.S. Zinc, calcium, protein, lead, mercury, and the sensorics quality of cireng snacks supplemented with blood cockle (Anadara granosa). Nusant. Biosci. 2017, 9, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Evans, B.; Leighton, F.A. A history of One Health. Rev. Sci. Tech. Int. Off. Epizoot. 2014, 33, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Monath, T.P.; Kahn, L.H.; Kaplan, B. One health perspective. ILAR J. 2010, 51, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shrivastava, S.; Shrivastava, P. Indispensable need to involve multiple stakeholders to ensure global food safety: World Health Organization. J. Integr. Health Sci. 2020, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Duc, P.P.; Toribio, J.-A.; Hai, N.H.T.; Dang-Xuan, S.; Luong, N.T.; Langley, S.J.; Dunham, J.G.; Thuy, D.T.; Hoa, D.V.; Nguyen-Viet, H.; et al. Food safety risk communication and training need of stakeholders and consumers regarding pork value chain in Vietnam. ILRI Res. Brief. 2020. Available online: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/108769 (accessed on 15 October 2021).
  95. Nkosi, D.; Bekker, J.; Hoffman, L. Impact of communal cattle farming practices on meat safety in central bushbuckridge, South Africa. Int. J. Vet. Sci. 2020, 9, 90–96. [Google Scholar]
  96. Das, A.K.; Nanda, P.; Das, A.; Biswas, S. Hazards and safety issues of meat and meat products. In Food Safety and Human Health; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 145–168. [Google Scholar]
  97. Nastasijevic, I.; Vesković, S.; Milijašević, M. Meat safety: Risk based assurance systems and novel technologies. Sci. J. Meat Technol. 2020, 61, 97–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gerofke, A.; Ulbig, E.; Martin, A.; Müller-Graf, C.; Selhorst, T.; Gremse, C.; Spolders, M.; Schafft, H.; Heinemeyer, G.; Greiner, M.; et al. Lead content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition–does “state of the art consumer health protection” require non-lead ammunition? PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liu, W.; Zafar, A.; Khan, Z.I.; Nadeem, M.; Ahmad, K.; Wajid, K.; Bashir, H.; Munir, M.; Malik, I.S.; Ashfaq, A. Bioaccumulation of lead in different varieties of wheat plant irrigated with wastewater in remote agricultural regions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 27937–27951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mareri, B.; Kitur, E.; Obade, P. Bioaccumulation of zinc, lead, cadmium in water hyacinth, hippo grass and papyrus reed as water quality indicator in River Kisat in Kisumu County, Kenya. Afr. J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2021, 2, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Czechowski, P.; Stevens, M.I.; Madden, C.; Weinstein, P. Steps towards a more efficient use of chironomids as bioindicators for freshwater bioassessment: Exploiting eDNA and other genetic tools. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 110, 105868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Asif, N.; Malik, M.; Chaudhry, F. A Review of on Environmental Pollution Bioindicators. Pollution 2018, 4, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Marescotti, M.E.; Caputo, V.; Demartini, E.; Gaviglio, A. Discovering market segments for hunted wild game meat. Meat Sci. 2018, 149, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Laricheva, K.; Petrov, D. The Experience in Implementing the Food Safety Management System at a Meat Processing Enterprise; IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  105. Antic, D.; Houf, K.; Michalopoulou, E.; Blagojevic, B. Beef abattoir interventions in a risk-based meat safety assurance system. Meat Sci. 2021, 182, 108622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. ISO 22000:2018. Food Safety Management Systems—Requirements for Any Organization in the Food Chain; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  107. Europian Union Commission, EUC. Maximum Levels of Cadmium in Foodstuffs. J. Eur. Union. 2014. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/ (accessed on 1 September 2021).
  108. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Geng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Guo, L.; Xiao, G. Spatial analysis of heavy metals in meat products in China during 2015–2017. Food Control 2019, 104, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Müller-Graf, C.; Gerofke, A.; Martin, A.; Bandick, N.; Lahrssen-Wiederholt, M.; Schafft, H.-A.; Selhorst, T.; Ulbig, E.; Hensel, A. Reduction of lead contents in game meat: Results of the ‘Food safety of game meat obtained through hunting’ research project. Game Meat Hyg. 2017, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Boqvist, S.; Söderqvist, K.; Vågsholm, I. Food safety challenges and One Health within Europe. Acta Vet. Scand. 2018, 60, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.