Next Article in Journal
The DOAJ Spring Cleaning 2016 and What Was Removed—Tragic Loss or Good Riddance?
Next Article in Special Issue
Open Access Routes Dichotomy and Opportunities: Consolidation, Analysis and Trends at the Spanish National Research Council
Previous Article in Journal
Eugene Garfield’s Ideas and Legacy and Their Impact on the Culture of Research
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enabling A Conversation Across Scholarly Monographs through Open Annotation

Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science

Center for Data, Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Goucher College, Baltimore, MD 21204, USA
Department of Geography, Environment and Sustainability, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Graham Building, 1009 Spring Garden St., Greensboro, NC 27412, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Publications 2019, 7(2), 44;
Received: 27 April 2019 / Revised: 30 May 2019 / Accepted: 11 June 2019 / Published: 17 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Frontiers for Openness in Scholarly Publishing)
A wide range of disciplines are building preprint services—web-based systems that enable publishing non peer-reviewed scholarly manuscripts before publication in a peer-reviewed journal. We have quantitatively surveyed nine of the largest English language preprint services offered by the Center for Open Science (COS) and available through an Application Programming Interface. All of the services we investigate also permit the submission of postprints, non-typeset versions of peer-reviewed manuscripts. Data indicates that all services are growing, but with submission rates below more mature services (e.g., bioRxiv). The trend of the preprint-to-postprint ratio for each service indicates that recent growth is a result of more preprint submissions. The nine COS services we investigate host papers that appear in a range of peer-reviewed journals, and many of these publication venues are not listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals. As a result, COS services function as open repositories for peer-reviewed papers that would otherwise be behind a paywall. We further analyze the coauthorship network for each COS service, which indicates that the services have many small connected components, and the largest connected component encompasses only a small percentage of total authors on each service. When comparing the papers submitted to each service, we observe topic overlap measured by keywords self-assigned to each manuscript, indicating that search functionalities would benefit from cutting across the boundaries of a single service. Finally, though annotation capabilities are integrated into all COS services, it is rarely used by readers. Our analysis of these services can be a benchmark for future studies of preprint service growth. View Full-Text
Keywords: preprints; postprints; scholarly communication preprints; postprints; scholarly communication
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Narock, T.; Goldstein, E.B. Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science. Publications 2019, 7, 44.

AMA Style

Narock T, Goldstein EB. Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science. Publications. 2019; 7(2):44.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Narock, Tom, and Evan B. Goldstein 2019. "Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science" Publications 7, no. 2: 44.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop