Next Article in Journal
The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

The DOAJ Spring Cleaning 2016 and What Was Removed—Tragic Loss or Good Riddance?

The University Library of Tromsø, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, NO-9037 TROMSØ, Norway
Publications 2019, 7(3), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030045
Received: 22 January 2019 / Revised: 8 May 2019 / Accepted: 28 May 2019 / Published: 27 June 2019
  |  
PDF [239 KB, uploaded 27 June 2019]
  |  

Abstract

In December 2012, DOAJ’s (The Directory of Open Access Journals) parent company, IS4OA, announced they would introduce new criteria for inclusion in DOAJ and that DOAJ would collect vastly more information from journals as part of the accreditation process—journals already included would need to reapply in order to be kept in the registry. My working hypothesis was that the journals removed from DOAJ on May 9th 2016 would chiefly be journals from small publishers (mostly single journal publishers) and that DOAJ journal metadata information would reveal that they were journals with a lower level of publishing competence than those that would remain in the DOAJ. Among indicators of publishing competence could be the use of APCs (Article Processing Charges), permanent article identifiers, journal licenses, article level metadata deposited with DOAJ, archiving policy/solutions and/or having a policy in SHERPA/RoMEO, the database containing self-archiving policies for more than 30,000 journals. The analysis shows my concerns to be correct. View Full-Text
Keywords: open access; DOAJ; publisher size open access; DOAJ; publisher size
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

  • Externally hosted supplementary file 1
    Doi: https://doi.org/10.18710/KCL56N
    Description: The DOAJ 2016 spring clean-upDraftIn
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Frantsvåg, J.E. The DOAJ Spring Cleaning 2016 and What Was Removed—Tragic Loss or Good Riddance? Publications 2019, 7, 45.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Publications EISSN 2304-6775 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top