Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Natural Organic Matter Removal from Water by UV/H2O2 Advanced Oxidation Using Central Composite Design
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Adsorptive Removal of Phosphonate Antiscalant HEDP by Mg-Al LDH
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pore-Engineered Magnetic Biochar: Optimizing Pyrolysis and Fe3O4 Loading for Targeted Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (CAH) Adsorption

1
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Safety, Qingdao 266000, China
2
SINOPEC Research Institute of Safety Engineering Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2025, 12(10), 260; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12100260
Submission received: 20 August 2025 / Revised: 11 September 2025 / Accepted: 19 September 2025 / Published: 24 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Removal of Environmental Pollutants and Bioremediation Strategies)

Abstract

Chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (CAHs) are some of the most widely distributed organic pollutants in underground environments and have high biological toxicity. This research aims to prepare an effective adsorbent comprising biochar and magnetite (MBC) to remove CAH pollution from soil. Optimization of the preparation and adsorption performance of MBC was investigated. The results of the adsorption experiment, combined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations, show that the best raw material and pyrolysis temperature were coconut shell and 500 °C respectively. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern characterizations, as well as the adsorption results, demonstrated the successful synthesis and enhancement effect of MBC for CAHs. The adsorption of CAHs on Fe3O4-loaded biochar was improved by 34.40–222.25% during pyrolysis at 500–900 °C. Additionally, MBC with a 10% Fe3O4 content had the best effect on three types of CAHs at low concentrations. A comparative pore analysis of MBC with different doses of Fe3O4 was carried out to reveal the relationship between the pore characteristics and adsorption properties. Furthermore, competitive adsorption experiments demonstrated that 4 wt% MBC addition significantly reduced the soil-bound TCE by 48.6%. Overall, these results indicated that MBC was an effective adsorbent for CAH removal from the polluted underground environment.

1. Introduction

Chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (CAHs) are a kind of ubiquitous pollutant that are often classified as dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs). Due to the improper use and disposal of some industrial activities, they often appear in groundwater [1]. These compounds are pervasive environmental contaminants, with approximately 71% of urban groundwater in China contaminated by at least one CAHs species [2]. Their carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic properties (“three-induced effects”) pose severe risks to ecosystems and human health [3]. Regulatory frameworks, such as the U.S. ATSDR priority list and China’s GB36600-2018 standard [4], mandate stringent controls on CAHs, underscoring the urgency for effective remediation technologies to mitigate their environmental footprint [5].
Physical, chemical, and biological methods have been studied and attempted for the remediation of chlorinated-hydrocarbon-polluted sites. Strategies such as enhanced reduction using conductive materials, microbial and iron-based material synergistic approaches, and activated carbon adsorption are employed to address contamination by typical CAHs, including trichloroethylene, trichloroform, and chlorobenzene [6,7,8]. CAH pollutants in the underground environment are usually dispersed. Enriching them by adsorption first and then carrying out the following treatment is an effective treatment method [9]. Physical adsorption is the dominant adsorption of chlorinated organics in aquifers; therefore, it is necessary to develop effective adsorption materials and study their surface adsorption mechanism [10].
Biochar (BC) is an environmentally functional material possessing dual advantages of practical value and ecological benefits. It not only effectively removes target pollutants but also serves as an efficient carbon sink for engineered sequestration, offering multifaceted advantages. Biochar exhibits moderate reducibility, exceptional adsorption capacity, and electron transfer capability. These properties give it significant potential for removing chlorinated organic compounds, such as trichloroethylene (TCE) [11,12] and pentachlorophenol (PCP) [13]. Consequently, it has been extensively investigated for soil and groundwater remediation.
In recent years, iron–carbon composites (including nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI), iron oxides, iron hydroxides, and their composites) and pollutants have been widely researched for soil pollution remediation [14]. Biochar and magnetite have been demonstrated to facilitate the biotic and abiotic transformation of 1,2-dichloroethane, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, and chlorobenzene [9,15,16,17]. As exogenous additives, these composites are increasingly being studied to enhance pollutant removal due to their good biocompatibility, high porosity, and strong adsorption capacity [18]. Among the diverse iron–carbon composites, biochar magnetite (MBC) has been widely studied for its excellent adsorption, reducibility, and electron transfer performance [19]. MBC can remove heavy metals (e.g., Pb2+, Cr3+, Cr6+, Hg2+) [20] and organic pollutants such as phenolic compounds (e.g., bisphenol A) [21], antibiotics (e.g., tetracycline) [22], and organic dyes (e.g., 2,4-difluoroaniline) [23] through electrostatic adsorption, ion exchange, redox reactions, and surface complexation. Magnetite and Fe (II) on the iron minerals surface can also play a reducing role in dechlorination of CAHs and elimination of pollutants such as carbon tetrachloride [24,25], dichloroethylene [26] and 1,2,3-trichloropropane [27]. For instance, studies demonstrate that their excellent electrochemical properties and adsorption capabilities promote the degradation of chlorinated organics, such as trichloroethylene (TCE) and atrazine (a chlorinated pesticide) [19,28]. Therefore, MBC can also remove chlorinated organics via adsorption, catalysis, and reduction from contaminated environment.
The application of MBC represents an effective remediation strategy for addressing CAH contamination in soil and groundwater. It utilizes the adsorptive property of the carbon matrix to preconcentrate pollutants, thereby enhancing subsequent chemical conversions and potentially supporting microbial detoxification. However, systematic research focusing specifically on the adsorption behavior of CAHs by MBC, especially under competitive conditions and in relation to material design, remains limited.
This study rationalized MBC composite design to enhance CAH removal. Pyrolysis and coprecipitation were applied to prepare biochar (BC) and MBC, respectively. Different feedstocks (coconut shell, peanut shell, and corn stover), pyrolysis temperatures (500–900 °C), and Fe3O4 ratios (10–100%) were investigated. Competitive adsorption experiments were used to investigate MBC’s competitive adsorption capacity and remediation potential in CAH-contaminated soil. The results provide a rich reference for the adsorption of typical chlorinated hydrocarbon pollutants, and provide an economical and effective high-quality MBC composite material for the absorption of CAHs in underground environments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of BC and Fe3O4@BC

Biochar (BC) was prepared from agricultural biomass wastes, including corn stalks, coconut shells, and peanut shells. The above-mentioned raw materials were first washed by deionized water under an ultrasonic treatment. Afterward, the cleaned material was dried at 105 °C, then pyrolyzed in a tubular furnace. The temperature was raised at a rate of 10 °C/min under a N2 flow of 120 mL/min and the system was held at the target temperature for 2 h [29]. The obtained biochar derived from corn stalk, coconut shell, and peanut shell under different pyrolysis temperature were designated as YMBC, YKBC, and HSBC, respectively. Then, the obtained biochar was ground and sieved to a particle size of 100–200 mesh (75~150 μm) for further characterization and MBC preparation. In addition, biochar produced from coconut shells at 500 °C (YK500), 750 °C (YK750), and 900 °C (YK900) were prepared for comparison.
MBC was synthesized by the co-precipitation method. Briefly, 1.0 g of the prepared biochar was dispersed in 50 mL of oxygen-free deionized water under continuous stirring and heated to 80 °C. Subsequently, FeSO4 and Fe2(SO4)3·7H2O were added into the mixture at a molar ratio of 1:2 (Fe2+/Fe3+). The mixture was continuously stirred for 30 min to achieve complete impregnation of the iron ion into the biochar matrix. Then, ammonia solution was added dropwise to adjust the pH to 10–11, followed by 1 h of stirring. After aging the cooled mixture (25 °C) for 24 h, the precipitate was collected by filtration. Sequential washing with deionized water and anhydrous ethanol was performed until a neutral pH was achieved, followed by vacuum drying at 50 °C to yield MBC [30,31]. Specifically, MBC prepared from YK500, YK700, and YK900 with 10% Fe3O4 loading were labeled as YK500M, YK750M, and YK900M, respectively. Additionally, YK500 prepared with 10, 50, and 100 wt% Fe3O4 loading were designated as 10%MBC, 50%MBC, and 100%MBC, respectively.

2.2. Characterization of BC and Fe3O4@BC

Surface morphology and elemental composition of the samples were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Thermo Scientific Apreo 2S, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, Bruker XFlash6|60, Billerica, MA, USA) [32]. Samples were sputter-coated with a 5 nm gold–palladium alloy prior to imaging at a 15 kV accelerating voltage. The crystal structure of BC and Fe3O4@BC was characterized by the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern using a D8 advance diffractometer (Rigaku Ultima IV, Tokyo, Japan) with a Cu Ka radiation source [33]. FTIR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet iS20 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [34] over 400–4000 cm−1. The BET surface area and porosity were characterized using an ASAP 2460 analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) via N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K [35].

2.3. Adsorption Performance of BC and Fe3O4@BC

Dynamic gravimetric vapor sorption (DVS) analysis was conducted on a BSD-DVS instrument (Beishide Instrument Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) to investigate the influence of the pyrolysis temperature (500, 750, 900 °C) and Fe/C ratio on the adsorption properties of all samples [36,37,38]. The gravimetric vapor sorption experiments were conducted using nitrogen as the purge gas. The measurements were performed at 25 °C, preceded by a degassing step at 200 °C for 180 min under an inert atmosphere. Trichloromethane (TCM), trichloroethylene (TCE), and chlorobenzene (CB) were calibrated based on their saturated vapor pressures at 25 °C, which are 26.32, 9.906, and 1.613 kPa, respectively. To determine the influence of the pyrolysis temperature on the adsorption capacities of the synthesized materials, adsorption capacities of YK500, YK750, and YK900, as well as their magnetic composites YK500M, YK750M, and YK900M, were evaluated. To determine the impacts of different Fe3O4 loading levels on the adsorption capabilities, the TCM, TCE, and CB adsorption performances of YK500, 10%MBC, 50%MBC, and 100%MBC were evaluated.

2.4. BET Analysis and Calculation

The BET method employs N2 as the adsorbate to characterize the surface area of samples by measuring the gas adsorption at varying pressures. According to the BET theoretical equations Equations (1) and (2), plotting P/[V(P0 − P)] against the relative pressure P/P0 yields a straight line. The slope of this line equals (C − 1)/CVm, while its intercept equals 1/CVm. The constant C and the monolayer adsorption capacity Vm can then be determined by simultaneously solving these slope and intercept relationships [39].
V V m = C × P ( P 0 P ) [ 1 + C 1 P / P 0 ]
1 V ( P 0 P 1 ) = C 1 C V m × P 0 P + 1 C
where P0 denotes the saturated vapor pressure of the adsorbate at the adsorption temperature (kPa), P represents the equilibrium gas pressure (kPa), Vm is the monolayer saturation adsorption capacity (mmol/g), V corresponds to the measured total adsorption quantity (mmol/g), and C is the characteristic constant of the BET equation.
The derived Vm value enables the calculation of the total number of molecules required to form a complete monolayer on the solid surface. With knowledge of the cross-sectional area occupied by a single adsorbate molecule, the samples’ total and specific surface areas can be determined using Equation (3):
S = A m × N A × V m 22,400 × 10 18
where S is specific surface area (m2/g), Am refers to the average cross-sectional area of a N2 molecule (0.162 nm2), NA is the Avogadro constant (6.02 × 1023), and Vm is the monolayer saturation adsorption capacity (mmol/g). In this study, the pore size distribution of the samples was calculated based on the Barret–Joyner–Hallenda (BJH) model (mesoporous) and Horvath–Kawazoe model (micropore).

2.5. Characterization of Competitive Adsorption Between MBC and Soil

To study the adsorption capacity of MBC for chlorinated hydrocarbons in contaminated soil, competitive adsorption experiments were conducted. First, TCE-contaminated soil was prepared as follows: first, impurities in natural soil were removed through a 2 mm sieve. To ensure the uniformity of the TCE pollutants in the soil, a certain quality of natural soil was taken and its water content was adjusted to about 50% with deionized water; then, a certain quantity of TCE was dissolved in acetone solution and mixed in evenly with the natural soil to form a certain concentration of organic-TCE-contaminated soil. Then, 25 g of contaminated soil and 15 mL of deionized water were placed into a 40 mL sample bottle, and 0 g (CK), 0.5 g (2 wt%), or 1.0 g (4 wt%) of MBC was added. The bottles were prepared in duplicates to ensure reproducibility and allow for experimental errors to be estimated. After shaking at 120 rpm for 48 h at room temperature, the soil, MBC, and aqueous liquid were separated.
The concentration of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (CAHs) was determined using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS; Agilent 7890B/5977B equipped with an Atomx XYZ system, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in accordance with the Chinese standard method HJ 643-2013 [40]. The headspace conditions were set as follows: incubation at 80 °C with shaking for 35 min. The GC oven temperature program was initiated at 40 °C (held for 2 min), increased to 150 °C at 15 °C/min (held for 5 min), and then raised to 290 °C at 3 °C/min (held for 10 min). The MS operating parameters included an ion source temperature of 230 °C, a quadrupole temperature of 150 °C, and an injector temperature of 300 °C.

3. Results

3.1. Optimization of Biochar Sources and Pyrolysis Temperatures for Enhanced TCM Adsorption

The adsorption performances of biochars derived from different biomass sources (coconut shell, peanut shell, and corn stover) and pyrolyzed at varying temperatures (500, 750, and 900 °C) were evaluated using TCM as the target pollutant. As illustrated in Figure 1a, YKBC demonstrated the highest adsorption capacity, followed by HSBC and YMBC. Under the conditions of P/P0 = 0.1 and 0.9, the adsorption capacities of YKBC were 2.27 and 1.24 times that of HSBC and 2.66 and 1.11 times that of YMBC, respectively. The adsorption capacity values of HSBC, YMBC, and YKBC were 30.89, 34.48, and 38.15 mg/g (measured at P/P0 = 0.9), respectively. The well-developed porous architecture of YKBC (Figure 1b) may be a plausible explanation for its enhanced adsorption performance relative to biochars derived from other biomass sources (HSBC and YMBC, as shown in Figure 1c,d.
Furthermore, the pyrolysis temperature’s effect on the adsorption performance of biochar was investigated. The significantly enhanced adsorption efficiency of YKBC pyrolyzed at 500 °C compared with those processed at 750 and 900 °C is shown in Figure 1e. Under the conditions of P/P0 = 0.1 and 0.9, the adsorption capacities of 500YKBC were 7.82 and 5.08 times that of 750YKBC and 3.00 and 3.61 times that of 900YKBC, respectively. The decreased adsorptions of YKBC750 and YKBC900 may be attributed to pore collapse and a decrease in surface functional groups under elevated thermal conditions. As shown in Figure 1g,h, high pyrolysis temperatures (750–900 °C) induced structural collapse of the biochar micropores/mesopores through carbonization and thermal stress [41], reducing the surface area and adsorption capacity, whereas lower temperatures (500 °C) preserve hierarchical pore structures essential for TCM adsorption. Additionally, high-temperature treatments may deactivate oxygen-containing functional groups or alter the surface chemistry [42], further weakening interactions between biochar and TCM molecules. These findings emphasize the importance of optimizing the pyrolysis biomass sources and pyrolysis temperature for the effective adsorption of pollutants.

3.2. Validation of Fe3O4 Synthesis and Composite Characterization

Based on coconut shell biochar pyrolyzed at 500 °C (500YKBC), Fe3O4-loaded biochar (Fe3O4@BC) was prepared using the coprecipitation method. The feasibility of Fe3O4@BC was confirmed through comprehensive material characterization (Figure 2). Firstly, Fe3O4@BC exhibited strong magnetic responsiveness via external magnetic fields (Figure 2a). The XRD analysis (Figure 2b) identified distinct peaks at 2θ = 30.1°, 35.5°, 43.1°, 57.0°, and 62.6°, corresponding to the (2 2 0), (3 1 1), (4 0 0), (5 1 1), and (4 4 0) planes of the pure cubic spinel crystal structure of Fe3O4 with cell constant a = 8.396 Å (JCPDS No. 19-0629), confirming successful crystallization. No impurity phases were detected, indicating the synthesized Fe3O4’s high purity. The SEM images and EDS elemental mapping (Figure 2c) revealed that synthetic nanoparticles containing Fe and O were uniformly dispersed on the biochar surface without significant aggregation. Combined with the above characterization, Fe3O4 was proved to be successfully compounded on the surface of BC and uniformly distributed.

3.3. Enhanced TCM Adsorption Using Fe3O4 Loading and Mechanistic Insights

The impact of the Fe3O4 loading and pyrolysis temperature on the TCM adsorption was systematically investigated using YKBC pyrolyzed at 500, 750, and 900 °C (YK500, YK750, and YK900) as the base material. As shown in Figure 3a–c, the adsorption capacities of YK500M, YK750M, and YK900M reached 184.90, 101.98, and 122.96 mg/g, respectively, representing substantial increases compared with the non-Fe3O4-loaded biochar samples YK500, YK750, and YK900, which exhibited capacities of only 137.58, 27.07, and 38.16 mg/g, respectively. Fe3O4@BC (10% Fe3O4 by mass, YK500M, YK750M, and YK900M) exhibited 34.40, 276.68, and 222.25% higher adsorption capacities compared with the unmodified YKBC (YK500, YK750, and YK900, respectively). Nano-Fe3O4 itself had a good adsorption capacity [43], and the Fe3O4 particle deposition on the biochar made the surface rough and increased the specific surface area (Figure 2c), which improved the adsorption performance of the material.
Moreover, the excellent adsorption capacities of YK500 and YK500M demonstrated that 500 °C was a more suitable pyrolysis temperature for the biochar adsorbing TCM compared with a higher temperature. An increase in pyrolysis temperature is advantageous for enhancing the conductivity of biochar but is detrimental to the retention of functional groups [42]. The adsorption of organic matter on the surface of biochar is mainly due to functional groups rather than the influence of conductivity. Therefore, the biochar obtained from relatively low-temperature pyrolysis and its Fe3O4-modified products were more suitable for TCM adsorption in this study.
Additionally, the enhancement could be attributed to the incremental chemisorption facilitated by Fe3O4. FTIR was applied to characterize the change in functional groups between before and after the TCM adsorption of BC (YK500) and Fe3O4@BC (YK500M), which provided critical insights into the adsorption mechanism. First, the significant shift in the -OH stretching vibration absorption peak (3000–3500 cm−1 of BC) indicates that the hydroxyl groups on the surface of biochar form hydrogen bonds or coordinate with the Fe2+ or Fe3+, which is also an important characteristic of Fe3O4 loading [44]. Additionally, Figure 3d shows absorption peaks at 1566 and 1381 cm−1, which are located in the aromatic characteristic absorption region and related to the C=C stretching vibration of biochar [45]. The absorption peaks near 1074 and 876 cm−1 are mainly related to C-O and C-H. These peaks shifted due to the influence of loaded iron oxide and adsorbed TCM [46]. Moreover, for pristine YK500, no significant chemical shifts or new peaks were observed after TCM adsorption, suggesting that the adsorption primarily occurred via physical entrapment within micropores. In contrast, Fe3O4@BC displayed a prominent absorption band at 732 cm−1 post-adsorption, corresponding to the C–Cl stretching vibration of TCM. The results indicate that the loading Fe3O4 introduced active surface sites capable of forming coordination complexes with TCM molecules. In general, Fe-O active sites can form Fe-O-Cl through oxygen bond coordination [47]. Although this was not measured in this study, this could still be a potential function. Consequently, the improvement in adsorption performance following the loading of Fe3O4 was influenced by both physical (pore filling, electrostatic adsorption) and potentially chemical (Fe-O-Cl complexation) factors.

3.4. Influence of Fe3O4 Loading Ratios on Adsorption Performance of Typical CAHs

The relationship between the Fe3O4 content (10, 50, and 100% by mass) and adsorption performance of typical chlorinated hydrocarbons (TCM, TCE, and CB) was evaluated (Figure 4). First the synthesized materials exhibited a significantly enhanced adsorption performance toward CAHs compared with previously reported carbon-based adsorbents. The saturated adsorption capacities (measured at P/P0 = 0.95) of CB on 10%MBC, 50%MBC, and 100%MBC were 147.78, 162.17, and 198.72 mg/g, respectively—significantly higher than 87.06 mg/g of 50YKBC. These values also exceed the range of 15.1–123.4 mg/g reported for functionalized carbon materials [8]. Moreover, the adsorption capacities for TCE all exceeded 100 mg/g, considerably higher than the value of 55 mg/g documented in [11]. This fully demonstrates that modification with ferric oxide is an effective method for improving the adsorption of CAHs on biochar.
Additionally, differences in the adsorption performance were observed between the materials with varying Fe3O4 loadings toward different CAHs. 10%MBC showed the best adsorption capacity in the adsorption of three types of chlorinated hydrocarbons (TCM, TCE, and CB), especially in the adsorption determination of TCM (Figure 4a). Different contents of Fe3O4@BC exhibited a 10%MBC > 50%MBC > 500YKBC > 100%MBC ranking from low concentration to close to the saturation concentration of TCM. For relatively large molecules, such as TCE and CB, at low concentrations, the adsorption capacity of different materials still showed a 10%MBC > 50%MBC > 500YKBC > 100%MBC ranking. However, at higher concentrations(Figure 4b,c), 100%MBC exhibited the most outstanding adsorption. 50%MBC also showed a reinforced adsorption capacity and exceeded that of 10%MBC at P/P0 = 0.95.
In general, the 10%MBC exhibited the highest adsorption capacity for three chlorinated hydrocarbons (CHCs)—TCM, TCE, and CB—at low concentrations. Regarding the small molecule TCM, 100%MBC even performed worse than 500YKBC without Fe3O4, while it demonstrated greater adsorption than 10%MBC and 50%MBC for larger molecules, such as TCE and CB, at high concentrations. Meanwhile, 100%MBC exhibited the greatest adsorption for large molecules, such as TCE and CB, at high concentrations.

3.5. Comparative Pore Analysis of the Synthetic Materials

The BET surface area, pore size, and pore volume distribution of the composites were analyzed using a BET analyzer. It is generally believed that the larger the specific surface area of an adsorbent, the stronger its adsorption capacity [48]. However, a nonlinear phenomenon was observed in this study. This nonlinear trend can be explained by the following factors: A small amount Fe3O4 nanoparticles provided abundant active sites and a high surface area without blocking biochar pores at the lower addition of 10%, maximizing the absorption contributions on the surface of biochar [48]. Excessive Fe3O4 (>50%) led to nanoparticle aggregation, which hindered micropores and reduced the micropore surface area, as well as the general (BET) surface area of biochar (Figure 5). However, the aggregation of Fe3O4 nanoparticle increased the mesopore surface area and mesopore pore volume, which also provided multilayer adsorption potentiality. The large molecules, such as TCE and CB, preferred to be absorbed by pores larger than mesopores.
Certainly, this correlation arises from molecular size effects, differences in diffusion kinetics, and the surface chemical properties of the various CHAs molecules, rather than from molecular size alone. Here, molecular size is referred to solely to distinguish between the three CAH species used in the experiments. Notably, 100%MBC exhibited the greatest adsorption compared with 10%MBC and 50%MBC for TCE and CB at high concentrations.

3.6. Competitive Adsorption Between MBC and Soil

As shown in Figure 6, in the control group (CK) without MBC, the soil retained 11.13 μg/g of TCE, while the liquid-phase TCE reached 51.08 μg/L, establishing baseline partitioning. Upon adding 2 wt% MBC, the soil TCE decreased to 9.64 μg/g, with the liquid phase at 48.98 μg/L and MBC adsorbing 115.27 μg/g of TCE. More strikingly, at 4 wt% MBC loading, the soil TCE further dropped to 5.72 μg/g, a 48.6% reduction compared with CK. Meanwhile, the MBC adsorption surged to 138.70 μg/g and the aqueous TCE declined markedly to 27.77 μg/L.

4. Discussion

Adsorption experiments, combined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), revealed that coconut-shell-derived biochar pyrolyzed at 500 °C exhibited the optimal performance. The successful synthesis of MBC and its enhanced adsorption capacity for CAHs were further confirmed using FTIR, XRD, and the corresponding adsorption results.
The adsorption process is generally influenced by the surface area of the material, pore structure, chemical functional groups, and the interactions between the adsorbate and the adsorbent [49]. The pore properties of MBC with different loading rates of iron oxide also vary, which, in turn, affect the adsorption performance of MBC on CAHs with different concentrations and molecular weights.
The results of the pore properties combined with the adsorption demonstrated that the adsorption of low-molecular-weight chlorinated hydrocarbons (such as TCM) is primarily governed by the general specific surface area and micropore structure, whereas the adsorption of high-concentration, near-saturation, large-molecular-weight chlorinated hydrocarbons (such TCE and CB) is predominantly influenced by mesoporous structures. According to the above results, the Fe3O4 loading ratios in MBC should be optimized based on the characteristics of the target pollutant (such as molecular weight and concentration).
Although the experimental results confirm that the presence of Fe3O4 enhances the CAH adsorption performance of biochar, the underlying chemical and physical mechanisms cannot be fully elucidated using FTIR analysis alone. The relationship between the textural properties (e.g., porosity, pore size distribution) and the adsorption behavior warrants more systematic and in-depth investigation. Further experimental results demonstrated that MBC actively competes for TCE adsorption in soil matrices, effectively immobilizing CAHs, thereby positioning it as a highly effective adsorbent for remediating CAH-contaminated soil systems. The material developed in this study is designed not only to efficiently adsorb CAHs but also to enable subsequent degradation of the concentrated pollutants through iron-mediated reduction or microbial processes. Moreover, the electron shuttle effect of Fe3O4 mediates microbial electron transfer and biogeochemical reactions in the underground environment and has the potential to promote pollutant degradation in a synergistic manner. Therefore, future research will focus particularly on elucidating the electron transfer mechanisms of Fe3O4 and the Fe(II)/Fe(III) redox processes involved in the degradation pathway.
Preliminary experiments have confirmed the adsorption effect of magnetic biochar (MBC) on typical chlorinated hydrocarbons. In practical applications, site applicability requires strict verification of the compatibility of materials with aquifer conditions (e.g., soil permeability, groundwater velocity, pollutant plume range/concentration), and evaluation of the MBC migration performance. Future research on MBC for CAH remediation should extend beyond the sorption capacity to elucidate its role in mediating microbial degradation and facilitating electrochemical reduction processes.

5. Conclusions

Biochar derived from coconut shell at 500 °C exhibited high structural integrity and adsorption affinity for various CAHs. Fe3O4 loading significantly enhanced the CAH removal via synergistic effects, with 10 wt% Fe3O4 being optimal for small or low-concentration CAHs (e.g., TCM), and 100 wt% Fe3O4 being the most effective for high-concentration macromolecular CAHs (e.g., TCE, CB). MBC also demonstrated potential for TCE release in contaminated soil, confirming its promise as a versatile remediant for CAH pollution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.Z., Z.L. (Zhengwei Liu), Y.X., J.L. and S.Z.; Methodology, F.Z., Z.L. (Zixuan Li) and X.D.; Software, F.Z.; Investigation, F.Z.; Resources, Y.X. and J.L.; Data curation, F.Z.; Writing—original draft, F.Z., Z.L. (Zixuan Li) and X.D.; Writing—review & editing, Y.X.; Supervision, Z.L. (Zhengwei Liu) and S.Z.; Project administration, Z.L. (Zhengwei Liu) and S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFC3713805) and Technology Development Program of SINOPEC, China (323018).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors were employed by the company SINOPEC Research Institute of Safety Engineering Co., Ltd. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sassetto, G.; Presutti, M.; Lai, A.; Simonetti, G.; Lorini, L.; Papini, M.P.; Zeppilli, M. Field Test of a Bioelectrochemical Membrane-Less Reactor for Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbon and Nitrate Removal from a Contaminated Groundwater. ChemPlusChem 2025, 90, e202400683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, J.; Lei, L.; Gong, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liu, H.; Chen, G.; Guo, G. Strategies and Mechanisms for Improving Groundwater Remediation Efficiency of Chlorinated Ethenes by Controlling the Particle Size of Polyhydroxyalkanoate. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 496, 154038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, L. Distribution Characteristics of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Contaminated Plots of Typical Organic Chemical Plants and Risk Assessment Based on Monte Carlo Simulation. J. Environ. Eng. Technol. 2024, 14, 98–111. [Google Scholar]
  4. GB36600-2018; Soil Environmental Quality Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Development Land. China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2018.
  5. Xiao, Z.; Jiang, W.; Chen, D.; Xu, Y. Bioremediation of Typical Chlorinated Hydrocarbons by Microbial Reductive Dechlorination and Its Key Players: A Review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 202, 110925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sheng, H.; Kang, Z.; Ni, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, M.; Cao, J.; Qian, L. Remediation of Trichloromethane-Contaminated Soil and Groundwater Using Microbial and Iron-Based Materials: A Review. Pedosphere 2025, 35, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, S.-H.; Li, Z.-T.; Lai, C.-Y.; Zhao, H.-P. Enhancing Reductive Dechlorination of Trichloroethylene in Bioelectrochemical Systems with Conductive Materials. Environ. Res. 2024, 261, 119773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhu, T.; Ye, M. Effects of Activated Carbon Properties on Chlorobenzene Adsorption and Adsorption Product Analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 236, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Chen, H.; Cao, W. Enhanced 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Removal from Soil by Electrokinetic Remediation Coupled with Biochar in a Permeable Reactive Barrier. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 28, 102835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abromaitis, V.; Racys, V.; van der Marel, P.; Meulepas, R.J.W. Biodegradation of Persistent Organics Can Overcome Adsorption–Desorption Hysteresis in Biological Activated Carbon Systems. Chemosphere 2016, 149, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zou, X.; Feng, Y.; Hu, M.; Lin, D.; Yang, K.; Wu, W. Highly Efficient Bioregeneration of High Temperature-Pyrolyzed Biochar after Trichloroethylene Adsorption through Biodegradation of Dehalococcoides. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 487, 150655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rossi, M.M.; Matturro, B.; Amanat, N.; Rossetti, S.; Petrangeli Papini, M. Coupled Adsorption and Biodegradation of Trichloroethylene on Biochar from Pine Wood Wastes: A Combined Approach for a Sustainable Bioremediation Strategy. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yu, L.; Yuan, Y.; Tang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, S. Biochar as an Electron Shuttle for Reductive Dechlorination of Pentachlorophenol by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gupta, V.K.; Nayak, A. Cadmium Removal and Recovery from Aqueous Solutions by Novel Adsorbents Prepared from Orange Peel and Fe2O3 Nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 180, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, X.; Yan, C.; Zeng, Y.; Li, W.; Peng, T.; Song, B.; Zhou, C. Abiotic Transformation of Chlorinated Organics at the Active Surface of Iron-Bearing Minerals in Soils and Sediments. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2024, 67, 2991–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leitão, P.; Aulenta, F.; Rossetti, S.; Nouws, H.P.A.; Danko, A.S. Impact of Magnetite Nanoparticles on the Syntrophic Dechlorination of 1,2-Dichloroethane. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 624, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, L.; Wu, W.; Chen, X.; Chen, M. Co-Sorption/Co-Desorption Mechanism of the Mixed Chlorobenzenes by Fresh Bulk and Aged Residual Biochar. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 429, 128349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yi, Y.; Huang, Z.; Lu, B.; Xian, J.; Tsang, E.P.; Cheng, W.; Fang, J.; Fang, Z. Magnetic Biochar for Environmental Remediation: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 298, 122468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Castro, C.S.; Guerreiro, M.C.; Gonçalves, M.; Oliveira, L.C.A.; Anastácio, A.S. Activated Carbon/Iron Oxide Composites for the Removal of Atrazine from Aqueous Medium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qu, J.; Shi, J.; Wang, Y.; Tong, H.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Tao, Y.; Dai, X.; et al. Applications of Functionalized Magnetic Biochar in Environmental Remediation: A Review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 434, 128841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Yao, B.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.; Niu, L.; Zhang, H. Fe-Loaded Biochar Facilitates Simultaneous Bisphenol A Biodegradation and Efficient Nitrate Reduction: Physicochemical Properties and Biological Mechanism. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 372, 133814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hang, J.; Guo, Z.; Zhong, C.; Sun, A.; He, K.; Liu, X.; Song, H.; Li, J. A Super Magnetic Porous Biochar Manufactured by Potassium Ferrate-Accelerated Hydrothermal Carbonization for Removal of Tetracycline. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 435, 140470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, Z.-Q.; Shen, X.-L.; Gao, L.-J.; Jin, X.; Li, Y.-M. Adsorption and Co-Adsorption of 2,4-Difluoroaniline and Copper (II) Using Nickel-Manganese Ferrite Magnetic Biochar Derived from Orange Peel. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2023, 234, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Elsner, M.; Haderlein, S.B.; Kellerhals, T.; Luzi, S.; Zwank, L.; Angst, W.; Schwarzenbach, R.P. Mechanisms and Products of Surface-Mediated Reductive Dehalogenation of Carbon Tetrachloride by Fe(II) on Goethite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 2058–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Amonette, J.E.; Workman, D.J.; Kennedy, D.W.; Fruchter, J.S.; Gorby, Y.A. Dechlorination of Carbon Tetrachloride by Fe(II) Associated with Goethite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 4606–4613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferrey, M.L.; Wilkin, R.T.; Ford, R.G.; Wilson, J.T. Nonbiological Removal of Cis-Dichloroethylene and 1,1-Dichloroethylene in Aquifer Sediment Containing Magnetite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 1746–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gu, C.; Li, J.; Zhou, W.; An, J.; Tian, L.; Xiong, F.; Fei, W.; Feng, Y.; Ma, J. Abiotic Natural Attenuation of 1,2,3-Trichloropropane by Natural Magnetite under O2 Perturbation. Chemosphere 2024, 357, 142040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hou, D.; Cui, X.; Liu, M.; Qie, H.; Tang, Y.; Leng, W.; Luo, N.; Luo, H.; Lin, A.; Yang, W.; et al. Degradation of Trichloroethylene by Biochar Supported Nano Zero-Valent Iron (BC-nZVI): The Role of Specific Surface Area and Electrochemical Properties. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 908, 168341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Ouyang, D.; Yan, J.; Qian, L.; Han, L.; Chen, M.; Li, J.; Gu, M. Mechanistic Insights into Adsorptive and Oxidative Removal of Monochlorobenzene in Biochar-Supported Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron/Persulfate System. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 400, 125811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohan, D.; Kumar, H.; Sarswat, A.; Alexandre-Franco, M.; Pittman, C.U. Cadmium and Lead Remediation Using Magnetic Oak Wood and Oak Bark Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Chars. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 236, 513–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nakahira, A.; Nishida, S.; Fukunishi, K. Synthesis of Magnetic Activated Carbons for Removal of Environmental Endocrine Disrupter Using Magnetic Vector. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2006, 114, 135–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stanton, M.M.; Park, B.-W.; Vilela, D.; Bente, K.; Faivre, D.; Sitti, M.; Sánchez, S. Sem-Magnetotactic Bacteria Powered Biohybrids Target E. Coli Biofilms. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 9968–9978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yan, X.; Li, H.; Wang, T.; Li, A.; Zhu, C.; Lu, G. Xrd-Engineering of Coordination Environment in Bioinspired Laccase-Mimicking Catalysts for Monitoring of Pesticide Poisoning. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 136930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Makam, P.; Yamijala, S.S.R.K.C.; Bhadram, V.S.; Shimon, L.J.W.; Wong, B.M.; Gazit, E. FTIR-Single Amino Acid Bionanozyme for Environmental Remediation. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, K.; Li, C.; Liang, Y.; Han, T.; Huang, H.; Yang, Q.; Liu, D.; Zhong, C. BET-Rational Construction of Defects in a Metal–Organic Framework for Highly Efficient Adsorption and Separation of Dyes. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 289, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vopička, O.; Friess, K.; Hynek, V.; Sysel, P.; Zgažar, M.; Šípek, M.; Pilnáček, K.; Lanč, M.; Jansen, J.C.; Mason, C.R.; et al. Equilibrium and Transient Sorption of Vapours and Gases in the Polymer of Intrinsic Microporosity PIM-1. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 434, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Glišić, I.; Ritsema van Eck, G.C.; Smook, L.A.; de Beer, S. Enhanced Vapor Sorption in Block and Random Copolymer Brushes. Soft Matter 2022, 18, 8398–8405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, J.; Xu, H.; Li, J.; Gong, K.; Yue, F.; Han, X.; Wu, K.; Shao, P.; Fu, Q.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Oxygen- and Proton-Transporting Open Framework Ionomer for Medium-Temperature Fuel Cells. Science 2024, 385, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhuang, S.; Wang, J. Adsorptive Removal of Pharmaceutical Pollutants by Defective Metal Organic Framework UiO-66: Insight into the Contribution of Defects. Chemosphere 2021, 281, 130997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, Z.; Lin, X.; Sun, M.; Ma, S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, S. Microbial Community Dynamics in Groundwater of a Petrochemical Refinery: Influence of BTEX and Dichloroethane Contamination. Water 2024, 16, 3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chun, Y.; Sheng, G.; Chiou, C.T.; Xing, B. Compositions and Sorptive Properties of Crop Residue-Derived Chars. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 4649–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Oh, S.-Y.; Seo, Y.-D.; Kim, B.; Kim, I.Y.; Cha, D.K. Microbial Reduction of Nitrate in the Presence of Zero-Valent Iron and Biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 200, 891–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, H.; Hu, M. An Intensive Study on the Magnetic Effect of Mercapto-Functionalized Nano-Magnetic Fe3O4 Polymers and Their Adsorption Mechanism for the Removal of Hg(II) from Aqueous Solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 210, 564–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kataria, N.; Garg, V.K. Application of EDTA Modified Fe3O4/Sawdust Carbon Nanocomposites to Ameliorate Methylene Blue and Brilliant Green Dye Laden Water. Environ. Res. 2019, 172, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shitu, A.; Chen, W.; Tadda, M.A.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, Z.; Liu, D.; Zhu, S.; Zhao, J. Enhanced Aquaculture Wastewater Treatment in a Biofilm Reactor Filled with Sponge/Ferrous Oxalate/Biochar Composite (Sponge-C2FeO4@NBC) Biocarriers: Performance and Mechanism. Chemosphere 2023, 330, 138772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jiang, Q.; Fang, R.; Gul, I.; Aer, L.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, J.; Tang, L. Halohydrin Dehalogenase Immobilization in Magnetic Biochar for Sustainable Halocarbon Biodegradation and Biotransformation. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 27, 102759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Deng, S.; Ren, B.; Hou, B.; Deng, X.; Deng, R.; Zhu, G.; Cheng, S. Adsorption of Sb(III) and Pb(II) in Wastewater by Magnetic γ-Fe2O3-Loaded Sludge Biochar: Performance and Mechanisms. Chemosphere 2024, 349, 140914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, Y.; Wei, X.; Sun, P.; Wan, J. Preparation, Characterization and Adsorption Performance of a Novel Anionic Starch Microsphere. Molecules 2010, 15, 2872–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Majumder, S.; Sharma, P.; Singh, S.P.; Nadda, A.K.; Sahoo, P.K.; Xia, C.; Sharma, S.; Ganguly, R.; Lam, S.S.; Kim, K.H. Engineered Biochar for the Effective Sorption and Remediation of Emerging Pollutants in the Environment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Adsorption of TCM on biochar prepared from different biomass sources and pyrolysis temperatures. (ad) Adsorption curves and corresponding SEM images of biochars derived from different biomass feedstocks pyrolyzed at 900 °C; (eh) adsorption curves and corresponding SEM images of coconut-shell-derived biochars prepared at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Figure 1. Adsorption of TCM on biochar prepared from different biomass sources and pyrolysis temperatures. (ad) Adsorption curves and corresponding SEM images of biochars derived from different biomass feedstocks pyrolyzed at 900 °C; (eh) adsorption curves and corresponding SEM images of coconut-shell-derived biochars prepared at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Separations 12 00260 g001
Figure 2. Magnetic observation (a), XRD (b), and SEM with EDS (c) characterizations of Fe3O4@BC and BC.
Figure 2. Magnetic observation (a), XRD (b), and SEM with EDS (c) characterizations of Fe3O4@BC and BC.
Separations 12 00260 g002
Figure 3. (ac) The adsorption isotherms of TCM on BC (YK500, YK750, and YK900) and Fe3O4@BC (YK500M, YK750M, and YK900M). (d) FTIR spectra of YK500 and YK500M after absorbing TCM.
Figure 3. (ac) The adsorption isotherms of TCM on BC (YK500, YK750, and YK900) and Fe3O4@BC (YK500M, YK750M, and YK900M). (d) FTIR spectra of YK500 and YK500M after absorbing TCM.
Separations 12 00260 g003
Figure 4. The adsorption isotherms of TCM (a), TCE (b), and CB (c) on 500YKBC and Fe3O4@BC (10%MBC, 50%MBC, and 100%MBC).
Figure 4. The adsorption isotherms of TCM (a), TCE (b), and CB (c) on 500YKBC and Fe3O4@BC (10%MBC, 50%MBC, and 100%MBC).
Separations 12 00260 g004
Figure 5. Comparative pore analysis of 500YKBC and Fe3O4@BC (10%MBC, 50%MBC, 100%MBC): micro/mesoporous surface area (a,b) and pore volume (c).
Figure 5. Comparative pore analysis of 500YKBC and Fe3O4@BC (10%MBC, 50%MBC, 100%MBC): micro/mesoporous surface area (a,b) and pore volume (c).
Separations 12 00260 g005
Figure 6. Dose–response of MBC on TCE sequestration from contaminated soil.
Figure 6. Dose–response of MBC on TCE sequestration from contaminated soil.
Separations 12 00260 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, F.; Li, Z.; Dou, X.; Liu, Z.; Xie, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, S. Pore-Engineered Magnetic Biochar: Optimizing Pyrolysis and Fe3O4 Loading for Targeted Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (CAH) Adsorption. Separations 2025, 12, 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12100260

AMA Style

Zhang F, Li Z, Dou X, Liu Z, Xie Y, Liu J, Zhang S. Pore-Engineered Magnetic Biochar: Optimizing Pyrolysis and Fe3O4 Loading for Targeted Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (CAH) Adsorption. Separations. 2025; 12(10):260. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12100260

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Fengyuan, Zixuan Li, Xiaohan Dou, Zhengwei Liu, Yan Xie, Jingru Liu, and Shucai Zhang. 2025. "Pore-Engineered Magnetic Biochar: Optimizing Pyrolysis and Fe3O4 Loading for Targeted Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (CAH) Adsorption" Separations 12, no. 10: 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12100260

APA Style

Zhang, F., Li, Z., Dou, X., Liu, Z., Xie, Y., Liu, J., & Zhang, S. (2025). Pore-Engineered Magnetic Biochar: Optimizing Pyrolysis and Fe3O4 Loading for Targeted Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbon (CAH) Adsorption. Separations, 12(10), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12100260

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop