Abstract
Biogas, a promising fuel for present and future generations, is produced from the anaerobic digestion of organic waste generated by the condominium itself. Therefore, this work aims to evaluate the exergoeconomic performance of a biogas cogeneration unit designed to meet the electrical and thermal energy demands of a residential condominium in the city of Teresina, Piauí, Northeast Brazil. The cogeneration unit consists of an internal combustion engine (ICE) coupled to an electric generator (genset) to produce electricity, and a heat exchanger that recovers part of the exhaust-gas heat to heat water. The analysis was conducted based on the concepts of Thermodynamics and Exergoeconomics, using the SPECO (Specific Exergy Costing) methodology to define the exergetic costs of the system. The novelty of the work lies in applying the SPECO exergoeconomic analysis to a small-scale biogas cogeneration unit fueled by residential organic waste. The achieved electricity production was 167.40 kW, and the heat transfer rate at the exchange rate was 51.55 kW. The results revealed that the exergy destroyed in the internal combustion chamber (ICE) was 223.65 kW, whereas that in the heat exchanger was significantly higher at 45.67 kW. The exergy efficiency of the ICE reached 39.19%, and the heat exchanger efficiency was around 9%. In financial terms, the cost of exergy destroyed in the ICEC was USD/h 135, but in the heat exchanger, it was dramatically higher at USD/h 158.40. The cost of producing hot water (product) was considered extremely high (USD/GJ 38.98). The relative difference parameter in the heat exchanger also has a value much higher than expected (10.240). This is because the product’s cost (USD/GJ 38.98) is well above the cost of fuel (USD/GJ 3.468). This study concludes that the cogeneration unit is more justifiable by the savings generated through thermal energy production than by electricity production alone, since the cogeneration system significantly enhances performance, raising both the energetic and exergetic efficiencies to 55% and 48%, respectively, thereby confirming the added value of the simultaneous utilization of heat and power.