You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Processes
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

21 November 2025

Special Issue on “Simulation, Modeling, and Decision-Making Processes in Manufacturing Systems and Industrial Engineering”

,
,
and
1
Department of Digital Economic and E-Commerce, Vietnam-Korea University of Information and Communication Technology (VKU), Danang 550000, Vietnam
2
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
3
Department of Electrical Engineering and Technology, Technological University of the Philippines Taguig, Taguig City 1630, Philippines
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Simulation, Modeling, and Decision-Making Processes in Manufacturing Systems and Industrial Engineering

1. Introduction

The rapid evolution of emerging technologies, the globalization of industrial networks, and the increasing complexity of production ecosystems have fundamentally reshaped the paradigm of modern manufacturing and industrial engineering. The advent of Industry 5.0, characterized by cyber–physical systems, artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and the Internet of Things (IoT), has not only transformed production processes but also redefined the way decisions are made across all levels of manufacturing systems. These transformations have resulted in an unprecedented need for integrating analytical rigor with digital intelligence to ensure system adaptability, operational resilience, and sustainability. Under such a dynamic context, organizations are challenged to respond to volatile market demands, resource constraints, and environmental responsibilities, while maintaining competitiveness and innovation capacity [1,2].
In this evolving industrial landscape, simulation, modeling, and decision-making processes represent the cornerstone of scientific inquiry and managerial practice. Simulation enables researchers and engineers to construct virtual representations of real-world systems, allowing for the exploration of complex interactions among production, logistics, and human factors without the cost or risk associated with physical experimentation. Modeling, both analytical and data-driven, provides a mathematical abstraction to interpret, predict, and optimize system behavior, facilitating the quantification of performance indicators under various operational scenarios. Decision-making processes, built upon these analytical foundations, transform quantitative insights into actionable strategies—supporting evidence-based planning, real-time control, and multi-objective optimization in uncertain environments [3].
Beyond their individual contributions, the integration of simulation, modeling, and decision analytics forms the intellectual core of modern industrial research, driving advances in intelligent manufacturing, digital twins, and sustainable production systems. This triad enables researchers to bridge the gap between theoretical frameworks and industrial realities, linking predictive analytics with prescriptive decision-making to enhance efficiency, flexibility, and competitiveness. Furthermore, as industries progress toward the era of Industry 5.0—emphasizing human-centric design, resilience, and ecological balance—these methodologies will play an increasingly pivotal role in ensuring that manufacturing systems evolve not only technologically but also socially and environmentally [1].
In light of these developments, this Special Issue, entitled “Simulation, Modeling, and Decision-Making Processes in Manufacturing Systems and Industrial Engineering”, aims to provide a comprehensive academic platform for advancing the theoretical foundations, computational methodologies, and empirical applications that define the future of industrial systems research. The Special Issue gathers sixteen carefully selected studies that collectively address how simulation-based approaches, modeling frameworks, and decision-support systems can be seamlessly integrated to improve operational performance, sustainability, and strategic decision-making across diverse manufacturing and industrial contexts. These contributions reflect a global and interdisciplinary perspective, showcasing the synergistic relationship between engineering science, data analytics, and managerial decision-making [4].
From a theoretical standpoint, the papers published in this Special Issue contribute to a deeper understanding of how modeling and simulation interact within complex, multi-layered production systems. They extend classical paradigms by incorporating modern algorithmic techniques, such as machine learning, evolutionary optimization, and digital twin technologies, offering enhanced accuracy, scalability, and adaptability to real-world uncertainties. Methodologically, these studies explore hybrid approaches that combine deterministic and stochastic models, qualitative and quantitative analyses, and computational and behavioral dimensions of decision-making. This multi-method integration provides a richer, more holistic framework for understanding how industrial systems evolve and how managers can make informed decisions in dynamic, uncertain environments [5].
Practically, the contributions emphasize the translation of theoretical insights into applicable solutions that can improve the design, control, and optimization of manufacturing processes. Case studies span a wide range of sectors, including energy conversion, chemical processing, logistics, metal forming, and smart production, demonstrating how simulation and modeling can guide efficiency improvements, resource allocation, and sustainable innovation. For example, data-driven decision-support frameworks are shown to assist policymakers in shaping renewable energy strategies, while optimization-based models enhance the flexibility and reliability of production scheduling, maintenance planning, and quality control systems. Such works exemplify how industrial research can directly contribute to technological advancement and socio-economic sustainability.
Moreover, this Special Issue underscores the importance of integrating human factors, environmental concerns, and digital transformation into industrial decision-making processes. As manufacturing systems increasingly rely on autonomous and intelligent technologies, the role of human cognition, ethics, and collaborative design becomes more critical in ensuring that technological progress aligns with societal and ecological values. By bridging theory, computation, and application, the research featured in this collection not only advances academic understanding but also offers practical pathways toward the realization of resilient, intelligent, and sustainable industrial systems.

2. Three Interrelated Strategic Directions Were Detected by the Set of Contributions Gathered in This Special Issue

The collective insights derived from the papers in this Special Issue reveal a clear trajectory toward three interrelated strategic directions that are reshaping the future of industrial and manufacturing systems—efficiency, resilience, and sustainability. These pillars represent not only operational objectives but also the conceptual foundation for the next generation of industrial transformation. In terms of efficiency, the contributions demonstrate how advanced simulation and optimization techniques can significantly enhance production throughput, minimize waste, and reduce system variability. The integration of computational intelligence, including metaheuristic optimization and machine learning, enables dynamic process control and predictive analytics, achieving higher productivity with fewer resources. This transition toward “smart efficiency” underscores the value of real-time data integration, digital twins, and adaptive modeling in achieving leaner yet more agile operations.
Equally important is the pursuit of resilience, as modern industries face increasing uncertainty due to supply chain disruptions, market volatility, and environmental fluctuations. The studies presented herein demonstrate how modeling and decision-making frameworks can be employed to design systems that can absorb shocks and maintain functionality under stress. Multi-scenario simulation, probabilistic modeling, and robust optimization methods are emerging as vital tools for developing decision-support systems that can anticipate disturbances, evaluate alternative responses, and facilitate rapid recovery. In this way, these methodologies contribute to building organizations that are not only efficient in steady states but also adaptable and self-correcting in dynamic contexts.
Ultimately, the theme of sustainability pervades the Special Issue as a unifying vision. Several contributions integrate environmental, social, and economic perspectives into the design and assessment of industrial processes, promoting the transition from resource-intensive production models to circular and regenerative systems. Simulation-based environmental assessment, life-cycle modeling, and energy efficiency optimization illustrate how data-driven strategies can reconcile profitability with ecological responsibility. More broadly, these studies affirm that sustainable industrial development requires both technological innovation and strategic governance, ensuring that the evolution of manufacturing systems aligns with global sustainability goals and social well-being.
In synthesis, the cross-pollination of efficiency, resilience, and sustainability reflects a paradigm shift—from isolated process optimization to systemic intelligence and collaborative adaptation. This integrated vision positions simulation, modeling, and decision-making not merely as analytical tools but as enablers of holistic transformation. As industries continue to navigate the convergence of digitalization, globalization, and environmental transition, these three pillars will define the roadmap for advancing industrial excellence in the decades to come [6,7].

3. Conclusions

This Special Issue has delved deeply into the core of contemporary manufacturing and industrial engineering, where simulation, modeling, and decision-making methodologies converge to address the multifaceted challenges of an increasingly complex industrial ecosystem. Collectively, the sixteen papers published in this Special Issue make several significant academic and practical contributions. First, they advance the theoretical understanding of industrial system dynamics by extending classical models toward hybrid and data-driven frameworks that better capture uncertainty, nonlinearity, and interdependence across multiple production layers. Second, they introduce innovative computational approaches—such as machine learning-enhanced optimization, digital twin modeling, and the integration of multi-criteria decision-making—that improve the accuracy, scalability, and adaptability of industrial analysis and control systems. Third, the contributions bridge the long-standing gap between analytical rigor and practical implementation, offering tangible tools for process design, energy management, logistics planning, and predictive maintenance across diverse sectors, including chemical processing, renewable energy, metal manufacturing, and intelligent production systems. Fourth, several studies emphasize the incorporation of behavioral, social, and environmental dimensions into decision-making frameworks, reflecting a more holistic and sustainable orientation in industrial engineering research, particularly in the era of Industry 5.0 and beyond.
From an editorial perspective, this collection highlights the growing importance of interdisciplinary integration—where engineering science, artificial intelligence, data analytics, and management theory intersect to form new paradigms for industrial innovation. It also reaffirms that the future of manufacturing lies not only in technological sophistication but also in systemic intelligence—the ability of organizations to learn, adapt, and optimize continuously within dynamic environments.
Looking ahead, future research should continue to expand in several promising directions. One avenue involves the fusion of digital twin technologies with real-time decision-making systems, enabling adaptive control and predictive optimization in complex production networks. Another lies in the integration of human-centric and cognitive models into simulation frameworks, ensuring that decision support systems remain aligned with human judgment, ethical considerations, and organizational behavior. Additionally, the application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in industrial modeling deserves greater attention to enhance transparency, interpretability, and trust in automated decision-making processes. Researchers should also pursue cross-disciplinary studies that link industrial engineering with environmental sciences, circular economy, and sustainability assessment, to guide the transition toward carbon-neutral and resource-efficient manufacturing. Finally, the development of standardized benchmarking datasets, open simulation platforms, and reproducible experimental protocols will be crucial to strengthening collaboration and accelerating innovation in this rapidly evolving field.
In conclusion, this Special Issue not only synthesizes the current state of research but also provides a roadmap for future investigations into the intersection of simulation, modeling, and decision-making. It is our hope that the insights presented herein will inspire further academic inquiry and industrial application, fostering the development of resilient, intelligent, and sustainable manufacturing systems that define the next generation of industrial excellence.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.T.P. and C.N.W.; methodology, V.T.P. and C.N.W.; validation, V.T.P., C.N.W., H.T. and N.L.N.; formal analysis, V.T.P.; investigation, V.T.P., C.N.W., H.T. and N.L.N.; resources, C.N.W.; data curation, V.T.P.; writing—original draft preparation, V.T.P.; writing—review and editing, C.N.W.; visualization, H.T. and N.L.N.; supervision, C.N.W.; project administration, C.N.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the support from the Vietnam-Korea University of Information and Communications Technology, University of Danang, Vietnam, and the National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Nazarejova, J.; Modrak, V. What Role Does Simulation Play in Sustainable Industrial Development? Processes 2024, 12, 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12051007.
  • Marzouk, O.A. Reduced-Order Modeling (ROM) of a Segmented Plug-Flow Reactor (PFR) for Hydrogen Separation in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles (IGCC). Processes 2025, 13, 1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051455.
  • Hung, Y.-H.; Yang, F.-C. Northern Lights: Prospecting Efficiency in Europe’s Renewable Energy Sector. Processes 2024, 12, 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12030618.
  • Zinveli, A.; Dragomir, M.; Dragomir, D. What’s Hot and What’s Not—A Simulation-Based Methodology for Fire Risk Assessment in Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing. Processes 2025, 13, 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13030837.
  • Li, Y.; Zhang, D. Toward Efficient Edge Detection: A Novel Optimization Method Based on Integral Image Technology and Canny Edge Detection. Processes 2025, 13, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020293.
  • Wang, C.-N.; Hsueh, M.-H.; Tran Thi, D.-O.; Le, T.D.-M.; Dinh, Q.-T. Optimal Maintenance Strategy Selection for Oil and Gas Industry Equipment Using a Combined Analytical Hierarchy Process–Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution: A Case Study in the Oil and Gas Industry. Processes 2025, 13, 1389. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051389.
  • Denizhan, B.; Yıldırım, E.; Akkan, Ö. An Order-Picking Problem in a Medical Facility Using Genetic Algorithm. Processes 2025, 13, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13010022.
  • Dai, J.; Ling, P.; Shi, H.; Liu, H. A Multi-Step Furnace Temperature Prediction Model for Regenerative Aluminum Smelting Based on Reversible Instance Normalization-Convolutional Neural Network-Transformer. Processes 2024, 12, 2438. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112438.
  • Zhao, K.; Shi, Q.; Zhao, S.; Ye, F.; Badran, M. Filling Process Optimization of a Fully Flexible Machine through Computer Simulation and Advanced Mathematical Modeling. Processes 2024, 12, 1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091962.
  • Tang, H.; Ding, Y.; Qiu, G.; Liu, Z.; Deng, Z. Numerical Simulations for the Mechanical Behavior of a Type-B Sleeve under Pipeline Suspension. Processes 2024, 12, 1585. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12081585.
  • Mohamad, N.; Ab. Aziz, N.A.; Ghazali, A.K.; Salleh, M.R. Improving Ammonia Emission Model of Urea Fertilizer Fluidized Bed Granulation System Using Particle Swarm Optimization for Sustainable Fertilizer Manufacturing Practice. Processes 2024, 12, 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12051025.
  • Ho, N.-N.-Y.; Nguyen, P.M.; Tran, C.T.; Ta, H.H. Determinants for Supplier Selection Based on Hybrid Grey Theory: Case Study of the Vietnamese Coffee Industry. Processes 2024, 12, 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12050901.
  • Shewakh, W.M.; Hassab-Allah, I.M. Finite Element Simulation of a Multistage Square Cup Drawing Process for Relatively Thin Sheet Metal through a Conical Die. Processes 2024, 12, 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12030525.
  • Czerwińska, K.; Pacana, A. Method of Analyzing Technological Data in Metric Space in the Context of Industry 4.0. Processes 2024, 12, 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020401.
  • Liu, W.; Dai, W.; Wang, X. Optimizing Production Schedules: Balancing Worker Cooperation and Learning Dynamics in Seru Systems. Processes 2024, 12, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12010038.
  • Feng, X.; Li, H.; Huang, J.; Ma, Q.; Lin, M.; Li, J.; Wu, Z. Structural Design and Analysis of a 100 kW Radial Turbine for an Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion–Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant. Processes 2023, 11, 3341. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11123341.

References

  1. Nazarejova, J.; Modrak, V. What Role Does Simulation Play in Sustainable Industrial Development? Processes 2024, 12, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rijwani, T.; Kumari, S.; Srinivas, R.; Abhishek, K.; Iyer, G.; Vara, H.; Dubey, S.; Revathi, V.; Gupta, M. Industry 5.0: A review of emerging trends and transformative technologies in the next industrial revolution. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. IJIDeM 2025, 19, 667–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, Y.; Gupta, H.; Springer, E.; Wagener, T. Linking science with environmental decision making: Experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management. Environ. Model. Softw. 2008, 23, 846–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, C.-N.; Tsai, T.-T.; Huang, Y.-F. A Model for Optimizing Location Selection for Biomass Energy Power Plants. Processes 2019, 7, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sahoo, S.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Kraus, S.; Dabić, M.; Mahto, R.V. Internationalization via industry 4.0 technologies: Application areas and future roadmap for international business. Manag. Rev. Q. 2025, 75, 3443–3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barbieri, P.; Boffelli, A.; Elia, S.; Fratocchi, L.; Kalchschmidt, M. How does industry 4.0 affect international exposure? The interplay between firm innovation and home-country policies in post-offshoring relocation decisions. Int. Bus. Rev. 2022, 31, 101992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brieger, S.A.; Chowdhury, F.; Hechavarría, D.M.; Muralidharan, E.; Pathak, S.; Lam, Y.T. Digitalization, institutions and new venture internationalization. J. Int. Manag. 2022, 28, 100949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.