1. Introduction
Work-related injuries are defined as any damage to the body caused by energy transfer during work, occurring shortly after exposure [
1]. These injuries can result from acute exposure to physical and chemical factors. They also arise from sudden deprivation of essential agents like oxygen or heat and are distinct from occupational diseases. In general, occupational injuries happen suddenly due to exposure to harmful conditions at work (like accidents, shocks, or burns). On the other hand, occupational diseases develop gradually over time due to prolonged or repeated exposure to physical, chemical, biological, or psychosocial hazards in the workplace, such as musculoskeletal disorders, respiratory diseases, hearing loss, etc.
Seafarers operate in a hazardous environment that includes physical, ergonomic, chemical, biological, psychological, and social factors, which may lead to work-related injuries and diseases [
2]. Workers at sea face higher rates of mortality, injuries, and diseases compared to those working ashore [
3]. They face occupational hazards specific to their environment, including the challenges of living and working in isolated and confined spaces, performing physically demanding tasks, such as cargo handling and ship maintenance, and dealing with environmental risks like extreme weather conditions and exposure to heavy machinery. Seafarers have a one in eleven chance of being injured while on duty, with physical injuries often being severe and a leading cause of disability [
4]. According to a study conducted on British merchant ships between 2003 and 2012, the shipping fatal accident rate was 21 times higher than that of the general British workforce, 4.7 times higher than that of the construction industry, and 13 times higher than that of the manufacturing industry [
5]. The death rate among Danish seafarers aboard was 11.5 times higher than the death rate among Danish male workers ashore [
6]. These figures suggest that seafarers are particularly vulnerable to harm in the workplace, underscoring the need for increased efforts to protect them.
Studies conducted onboard ships reported that work-related injuries accounted for most medical events requiring teleconsultation. For instance, a recent study on German-flagged container ships found that accidents were the second most frequent reason for seeking medical advice, accounting for 17.9% of cases [
7]. The results of our previous study also indicated that work-related injuries constituted the second most common reason for accessing teleconsultation onboard (16.4%) between 2010 and 2018 [
8]. A study conducted among American seafarers reported that injuries most frequently resulted in lost work compared to diseases [
9]. According to a study of Swedish merchant and passenger ships between 1997 and 2012, 20% of all contacts for medical advice resulted from accidents involving seafarers [
10]. Occupational injuries are consistently reported as a major reason for seeking telemedical consultations on board ships. However, existing research has primarily focused on the frequency of injuries, with limited attention to the detailed characteristics of those injuries. The difference in injury patterns between different occupational and worksite groups on ships remains largely unexplored.
The present study has analyzed the frequency and characteristics of telemedicine-assisted work-related injuries among seafarers on board Italian-flagged ships from 2010 to 2022. By evaluating differences in injury patterns across occupational and worksite groups, the study provides valuable insights for the development of targeted preventive measures, improving telemedical assistance to seafarers, and enhancing maritime occupational safety.
2. Materials and Methods
A retrospective descriptive approach to analyze medical data obtained from the database of the Centro Internazionale Radio Medico (C.I.R.M.) was followed. C.I.R.M. is the Italian Telemedical Maritime Assistance Service (TMAS), offering remote medical support to seafarers and passengers on board ships without a doctor since 1935. The service covers 24 h a day, 7 days a week, and 365/366 days a year, regardless of seafarers’ nationality and vessel positions. Over the past 90 years, C.I.R.M. has assisted more than 140,000 individuals at sea, conducting over 700,000 teleconsultations, an average of five per patient.
The present study has considered all seafarers assisted onboard Italian-flagged vessels for work-related injuries from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2022. A total of 960 seafarers reported injuries during the study period and received medical assistance from C.I.R.M. through various telemedicine methods, including video calls, emails, and radio or cell phone communications. After assisting a patient with the reported injury, a trained C.I.R.M. telemedicine data manager routinely extracted the patient’s demographic information, injury causes, diagnoses, affected body parts, end-of-follow-up outcomes, number of teleconsultations, and other medical data. Occupational injuries were recorded in the database following the ICD-10 classification by the World Health Organization, covering chapter XIX codes S00-S99 and T00-T98. For this study, data on individual injured seafarers, including age, sex, occupation, nationality, work sites, places where the injury occurred (in ports or at sea), parts of the body affected, nature of injuries, causes of injury, number of consultations, and outcomes, were systematically retrieved from the database.
Data were checked, recoded, entered, and analyzed using the R programming language (Version 4.4.1) [
11]. We calculated a seafarer’s age by subtracting his or her date of birth from the date on which medical advice was given. We excluded seafarers without a recorded birth date from the study. Seafarers were classified according to their occupational rank into deck officers, deck ratings, engine officers, engine ratings, galley staff, and others, while worksites were categorized into deck, engine, and catering departments. Seafarers were classified into four age groups: under 30 years, from 30 to 40 years, from 41 to 50 years, and from 51 years and older. Injury characteristics were categorized by type, cause, and anatomic location. A descriptive statistical analysis of seafarers’ demographic data was performed to evaluate work-related injury distribution. Differences in the distribution and characteristics of injuries were examined and compared across seafarers’ occupational ranks and worksite groups using descriptive statistics. Comparison of categorical variables was performed using the chi-square test to determine if the observed distribution significantly differs from the expected under the assumption of independence, considering a
p-value below 0.05 as significant.
4. Discussion
From 2010 to 2022, C.I.R.M. has assisted 960 seafarers on board Italian-flagged vessels due to work-related injuries. These assistances required 4320 teleconsultations, with an average of 4.5 teleconsultations per seafarer. In this study, we included 793 individuals with work-related injuries out of the 960 seafarers assisted. The reason for their exclusion was that they did not meet the inclusion criteria.
Occupational injuries are the leading cause of work absence, mortality, and medical unfitness for work at sea among sailing seafarers [
9,
12,
13]. Limited research has examined the variations in the frequency and characteristics of work-related injuries among different seafarer occupational groups and work sites. The current study has analyzed data from the C.I.R.M. database on telemedicine-assisted work-related injuries sustained on Italian-flagged vessels between 2010 and 2022, examining differences in injury frequency and characteristics based on seafarers’ roles and worksite groups. We have observed that most deck ratings (28%) reported work-related injuries compared to other occupational groups. This might be due to the nature of their duties. Deck ratings are typically responsible for physically demanding and labor-intensive tasks such as cargo handling, mooring operations, maintenance work, cleaning, and assisting with navigation-related activities. About two-fifths of study participants who reported injuries were aged between 30 and 40 years (39.2%). This relatively young age of people experiencing accidents suggests a lack of experience working at sea. Our findings are consistent with those of a recent study on German-flagged ships, which reported that most deck ratings sustained injuries (22.5%) [
7]. The reason is probably because deck ratings often perform physically demanding tasks, such as loading and unloading cargo, which increases their risk of injury. Further, they frequently work in challenging conditions, including rough seas and adverse weather conditions, which can lead to accidents. Moreover, long working hours and fatigue may further increase the likelihood of injuries among this group [
7].
Injury analysis based on the anatomic location of body parts revealed that the most common injuries affected, in descending order, hand/wrist (33.3%), knee/lower legs (21%), and head/eye (19%). These injuries together represented three-quarters of all reported injuries during the study period. The percentage distribution of injuries across the body suggests a higher frequency of hand and/or wrist injuries compared to other regions, reflecting the nature of work on ships, which often requires repetitive movements or handling of heavy equipment. In line with our findings are the results of a study performed on American seafarers reporting that the most frequently injured body parts were the upper extremities (34%), particularly hand and wrist injuries [
9]. Moreover, the above study on German-flagged ships found that hands (44%) and head/neck (36.3%) accounted for most of all injuries [
7]. Safety training programs that emphasize proper lifting techniques and the use of protective wear are crucial to reducing the occurrence of these common injuries. Maintaining equipment regularly and adhering to all safety protocols can also help mitigate risks. Moreover, promoting a culture of safety and awareness of prevention among crew members may contribute to a safer working environment aboard a vessel.
Regarding causes of injury, slips/falls (32%), burns/explosions (16.6%), and overexertion while lifting or carrying heavy weights (14.8%) were the leading causes of injuries on board Italian-flagged vessels during the study period, collectively contributing to nearly two-thirds of all reported injuries. An investigation on fisheries revealed that falls and accidents related to machines were the most common causes of occupational injuries [
14]. Accidents related to accessing and boarding ships often involve the angle of inclination of stairways, gangways, ladders, and other boarding locations [
15]. 44% of injuries among seafarers were related to slips, falls, and trips (STFs), as reported by Jensen OC et al. in 2001 [
16]. Furthermore, in 2005, it was reported that 43% of injuries were related to STFs [
17]. These findings are consistent with those of the International Labor Organization (ILO), reporting that 35% of injuries were related to STFs [
18]. To prevent slips and falls, it is essential to maintain clean, dry surfaces and ensure that wet areas are marked. The implementation of regular safety training can help crew members avoid overexertion injuries caused by heavy weights. In addition, installing fire suppression systems and providing adequate personal protective equipment can reduce the risk of burns and explosions.
In terms of the nature of injury, open wounds were the most common type, representing approximately 38% of all reported injuries. This prominence can be explained by the nature of shipboard tasks, which often involve the use of sharp materials, heavy machinery, and direct manual handling of equipment and cargo. Operations on deck and aboard machinery expose seafarers to risks such as cuts from cables and ropes, punctures from tools or machinery, and lacerations caused by slipping or contact with hard surfaces. Burns or abrasions accounted for 16.6% of the total reported injuries, followed by dislocations, sprains, or strains at 12.6%. Our findings align with a study on German-flagged container ships, which reported that the most common types of injuries were open wounds (33.3%) and burns (23.3%) [
7]. In many workplaces, accidents involving sharp objects, machinery, or tools often result in open wounds. Furthermore, slips and falls may result in cuts and lacerations, contributing to the high rate. This type of injury is also more likely to occur when there are inadequate safety measures and insufficient protective equipment. It is important to note that these injuries can lead to serious health complications, such as infection and nerve damage. To minimize the risk of such injuries, proactive measures are essential.
Occupational rank-related differences in injury location: hand/wrist injuries were more common among engine officers (35.8%), head/eye injuries among engine ratings, knee/lower leg injuries among deck ratings, shoulder/upper arm injuries among deck officers, and skin burn injuries among galley staff members. As a result of the specific tasks and environments associated with each role, these differences may exist. Frequently, engine officers work with machinery, increasing their risk of hand/wrist injuries, while engine ratings are exposed to conditions that are likely to cause head/eye injuries. Deck officers and deck ratings perform physical tasks on deck, which may explain the prevalence of knee/lower leg and shoulder/upper arm injuries. Similarly, galley staff are regularly exposed to heat and cooking equipment, increasing their risk of skin burns. It is possible to reduce these occupational injuries by implementing targeted safety measures and training programs. It is recommended that engine officers be provided with protective gloves and undergo regular safety drills on how to handle machinery. Engine ratings should wear protective eyewear to prevent head and eye injuries. Deck officers and ratings may benefit from ergonomic tools and proper lifting techniques to avoid shoulder and knee injuries. Moreover, galley staff should have access to heat-resistant gloves and equipment to minimize skin burn risk.
The variation in types of injuries observed across different rank groups can be largely attributed to the nature of job roles and daily activities on board. Each group performs distinct tasks that expose them to specific risks, which in turn influence the pattern of reported injuries. For instance, open wounds were more common among deck ratings (41.2%), dislocations/sprains/strains were among deck officers (20%), burns/abrasions were among galley staff members (27.5%), cuts/lacerations were among engine ratings (17.4%), and amputations were among engine officers (7%). Our findings are consistent with those of the study conducted on German-flagged container ships, which reported open wounds (33.3%) and burns (23.3%) as the most common injuries [
7].
The above data confirm that seafaring is one of the most hazardous occupations, and crew members face various challenges due to their working environment. For instance, the floors, stairs, ladders, doors, and gaps can be dangerous, especially during storms and rain due to the wetness. Our study has shown that 35.5% of the reported injuries in deck ratings resulted from slips/falls, 32.5% were related to burns/explosions in galley staff, and nearly 19% were related to being caught in machinery and equipment by engine officers and engine ratings. To prevent these issues, safety protocols should be improved in specific areas to reduce workplace injuries. It is evident from the high rate of slips and falls among deck ratings that better traction surfaces and fall prevention training are needed. Furthermore, the significant number of burns and explosions among galley employees underscores the importance of implementing stricter safety measures and training programs to ensure the safe handling of hazardous materials and equipment.
Analysis of work site-related differences in injury location revealed that most hand/wrist (35.3%) and elbow/forearm (4.1%) injuries occurred in the engine departments of ships, while most head/eye (21%), knee/lower legs (24%), and shoulder/upper arm (6%) were reported from the deck department. Open wounds (40%), fractures (13%), and dislocations/sprains/strains (15%) were the most common issues in the deck department, while cuts/lacerations (13.4%) and amputations (6.3%) were the most common injury natures in engine departments. In the catering departments, burns/abrasions (27.5%), cuts/lacerations (13.8%), and bruises/contusions (10%) were the most common types of injury. Most deck department injuries were caused by slips/falls (35%) and overexertion while lifting and carrying (19%). In engine departments, more frequent accidents were due to being caught in machinery or equipment (19%) and struck by objects (14.7%). In catering areas, burns/explosions (32.5%) were the main cause of accidents. In the deck department, injuries often resulted in fractures and dislocations, indicating a higher severity level compared to other departments. In the engine department, a higher incidence of amputations and severe injuries, often due to machinery-related accidents, was noticeable. Catering department workers primarily dealt with less severe injuries such as burns and bruises, reflecting less relevant risks in that ship area. In general, different ship areas are exposed to injuries of different types and severity. This indicates that safety protocols must be tailored to the specific risks of each department.
Telemedicine plays an increasingly essential role in addressing work-related injuries among remote populations, particularly seafarers who often work far from immediate medical support [
19,
20]. Seafarers frequently sustain injuries in environments where access to medical facilities is delayed due to long voyages or remote locations. Telemedicine enables real-time consultation with shore-based doctors or healthcare providers, allowing for early diagnosis, timely intervention, and appropriate triage of injuries [
20,
21]. This reduces complications from delayed treatment and ensures a safer return to work. In terms of severe injuries, telemedical guidance can optimize first aid, stabilize the patient, and determine whether emergency evacuation is necessary [
21]. Similarly, it reduces the overall health burden by minimizing injury severity and long-term disability. In terms of international regulations and standards, the use of telemedicine in maritime healthcare is supported by international conventions and guidelines. As for the guidelines, the International Labor Organization’s (ILO) Maritime Labor Convention (MLC, 2006) and the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) require that ships ensure access to medical care equivalent to that available on shore [
2,
22]. In terms of standards, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) recognize telemedical maritime assistance services (TMAS) as a standard means of fulfilling these obligations [
19,
23]. This regulatory framework not only legitimizes telemedicine but also mandates its integration into occupational health systems at sea, reinforcing its role in injury prevention and management. Most of the TMAS centers, including C.I.R.M., offer free medical assistance to ships during emergency consultations, whether related to injuries or illnesses. However, occupational injuries impose a substantial financial burden on shipping companies through direct medical costs, emergency evacuations, lost working days, compensation claims, and potential legal liabilities [
24]. Telemedicine helps reduce these costs by reducing the frequency of unnecessary evacuations or diversions of the ship, shortening recovery times through early intervention, and preventing minor injuries from escalating into severe or chronic conditions [
19,
20,
21].
Limitations of the study: One of the main limitations of this study is the lack of detailed demographic, occupational, and exposure-related information for the total at-risk population of seafarers working on Italian-flagged ships. Consequently, it was not possible to identify predictors of work-related injuries or use more advanced statistical models. Instead, the analysis was limited to describing injuries based on their characteristics, such as type, location, and cause. To fill this gap, future studies should systematically include demographic and occupational variables, as these factors may significantly influence injury risks and outcomes. Another limitation is the very low representation of female seafarers in the dataset, making up only 3.9% of reported injuries. This prevented us from making meaningful comparisons based on sex. Given the growing global interest in gender diversity in maritime professions, future research should focus more on the experiences and risks faced by female seafarers, even if their numbers remain relatively low. Additionally, the retrospective design of the study limited the analysis to variables already available in the dataset, which may not fully capture the complexity of work-related injury risks on board. Therefore, prospective studies with more comprehensive data collection are recommended to gain deeper insights. Despite these limitations, this study stratified injuries by mechanism, providing valuable data to identify priority areas of concern. These findings can inform maritime health policymakers, employers, and other stakeholders in developing targeted prevention strategies. Integrating these data into occupational health and safety programs is essential for reducing the burden of injuries among seafarers and improving the overall safety culture in the maritime industry.