Abstract
In this paper, two new refinements of the Erdös–Mordell inequality and three new refinements of Barrow’s inequality are established. Some related interesting conjectures are put forward.
1. Introduction
In 1935, Erdös [1] proposed the following geometric inequality:
For any interior point P of the triangle , let be the distances from P to the vertices , respectively, and let be the distances from P to the sides , respectively. Then
where ∑ denotes the cyclic sums (we shall use this symbol in the sequel). Equality in (1) holds if and only if the triangle is equilateral and P is its center.
Two years later, Mordell and Barrow [2] first proved the inequality (1), and the latter actually obtained the following sharpness:
where are the lengths of the bisectors of , respectively.
The above two inequalities have long been famous results in the field of geometric inequalities. The former is called the Erdös–Mordell inequality, which has attracted the interest of many authors and motivated a large number of research papers (see [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] and the references cited therein).
In 1957, Ozeki [22] first obtained the following generalization of Barrow’s inequality (2) for convex polygons: For any interior point P of the convex polygon , it holds that
where and denote the lengths of the bisectors of and .
In 2012, when the author considered Oppenheim’s inequality (see [24])
the following sharpened version of the Erdös–Mordell inequality was found:
with equality if and only if is an isosceles right triangle and P is its circumcenter. Furthermore, by using inequalities (4), (5), and other results, the author obtained a series of refinements for the Erdös–Mordell inequality in [14,16].
In this paper, we shall give two new refinements of the Erdös–Mordell inequality and three new refinements of Barrow’s inequality. In addition, we shall present several interesting related conjectures in the last section.
2. Refinements of the Erdös–Mordell Inequality
In [11], the author proved the following refinement of the Erdös–Mordell inequality:
where are the corresponding altitudes of the sides of the triangle .
Here, we further give the following result:
Theorem 1.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
Equalities in (7) all hold if and only if is equilateral and P is its center.
To prove Theorem 1, we first give several lemmas.
Lemma 1.
For any triangle with sides and real numbers , it holds that
with equality if and only if .
For any triangle with sides , we have . Thus, can be viewed sides of a triangle, and we see that inequality (8) can be obtained by using the following weighted Oppenheim inequality (see [19], p. 681):
(where S is the area of ) and the following equivalent form of the Heron formula:
Remark 1.
In the Appendix A of my monograph [17], Theorem A3 gives an equivalent theorem for the geometric transformations, which includes the following conclusion: An inequality involving any interior point P of the triangle ,
is equivalent to
In fact, this conclusion can be extended to the following:
Lemma 2.
With above notations, the inequality
is equivalent to
Proof.
Let be the pedal triangle of P with respect to the triangle (see Figure 1), and let , then it is easy to get
Figure 1.
An inequality involving any point P inside triangle is equivalent to the one involving the point P and its pedal triangle with respect to .
Let be the distances from P to the side lines , respectively, we also easily obtain
In addition, by means of the known formula in the triangle
(where is the bisector of ) and the fact that , we get
where is the bisector of . Two similar relations hold for the bisectors of , respectively.
Lemma 3.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
with equality if and only if .
Inequality (19) is well-known and is easily proved (see [29], p. 111).
Next, we prove Theorem 1.
Proof.
Since etc., the second inequality in (7) is evidently valid. In addition, the third inequality of (7) is easily obtained (see [11]).
We now prove the first inequality in (7), i.e.,
According to Lemma 2 and the relations (15) and (16), we further know that inequality (22) is equivalent to
i.e.,
But using , Lemma 3, and the known formula
(where ), we have
Thus, in order to prove inequality (23), we only need to prove that
Now we state and prove the second refinement of the Erdös–Mordell inequality.
Theorem 2.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
Proof.
In triangle , we have the following known angle bisector formula:
Noting that and , we have
with equality if and only if . Applying this inequality to , we get
Hence, we have
that is,
Adding to both sides of the above inequality and then squaring root, we obtain
Sine etc., the first inequality in (27) obviously holds. Note that the equality in (30) holds if and only if , thus the equality in (31) holds if and only if , which means that P is the circumcenter of the triangle . Furthermore, we can conclude that the first equality in (27) holds if and only if P is the circumcenter of the triangle .
Clearly, the second inequality in (27) is equivalent to
Removing to the right and arranging gives the previous Oppenheim inequality (4), which has been proved by the author in different ways (see [12,14]).
For the third inequality in (27), by squaring both sides and arranging, we know that it is equivalent to
which was first established by Chu in [30] and proved by the author in another way in [15]. In addition, we have known that both equalities in (4) and (33) hold if and only if is equilateral and P is its center. This completes the proof of Theorem 2. □
From Theorem 2, we have
Corollary 1.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
Furthermore, we can easily obtain the following inequality:
Corollary 2.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
3. Refinements of Barrow’s Inequality
In [14], Theorem 4.3 gives the following refinement of the Erdös–Mordell inequality:
which is actually equivalent to
Now, we point out that for Barrow’s inequality (2), the following similar result holds:
Theorem 3.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
Equalities in (38) hold if and only if is equilateral and P is its center.
Clearly, the first inequality in (38) is also equivalent to the following interesting form:
To prove this inequality, we first prove a strengthening of the previous inequality (5), which is posed by the author in [12] as a conjecture.
Lemma 4.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
with equality if and only if and P is the circumcenter of the triangle .
Proof.
Since and , to prove the above inequality we only need to prove that
Letting and (41) then becomes
Note that can be viewed angles of a non-obtuse triangle. To prove inequality (42), we only need to prove that the following inequality holds for non-obtuse triangles and real numbers :
that is,
Multiplying both sides by and using the law of cosines, we can transform the proof to the following weighted inequality:
If we denote by the value of the left-hand side of (45), then it is easy to check the following identity:
which shows that inequality holds clearly. Moreover, from (46) we can obtain the following conclusions: (i) if , then the equality in (43) holds if and only if ; (ii) if , then the equality in (43) holds if and only if and . According to this conclusion, we can further determine the equality condition of (40), just as mentioned in Lemma 4. This completes the proof of Lemma 4. □
Remark 2.
We now prove Theorem 3.
Proof.
Next, we state and prove the second new refinement of Barrow’s inequality (2).
Theorem 4.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
The second equality in (47) holds if and only if P is the circumcenter of the triangle .
Proof.
Firstly, we prove the first of (47):
According to Lemma 2, we only need to prove that
Thus, we see that inequality (49) is equivalent to
But, for any real numbers and , we have the following Wolstenholme inequality (see [19]):
with equality if and only if . Putting in (52) and substituting etc., we get inequality (51) at once. Thus, inequality (48) is proved.
The second inequality in (47) follows immediately by adding the previous inequality (30) and its two analogues. Note that the equality in (30) holds if and only if . We conclude that the second equality in (47) holds if and only if , which means that the point P is the circumcenter of . The proof of Theorem 4 is completed. □
Remark 3.
The author knows that the triangle need not be equilateral when the first equality in (47) holds but does not know what are the barycentric coordinates of P with respect to the triangle .
Now we give an application of Theorem 4.
Squaring both sides of the first inequality of (47), we have
Then, applying inequality (30), we further get
Expanding gives the following:
Corollary 3.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
In fact, by using the previous inequality (30), we have the following extension:
which implies Barrow’s inequality (2).
Finally, we give the third new refinement of Barrow’s inequality:
Theorem 5.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
Proof.
In the proof of Theorem 2, we have proved the first inequality in (55). The second inequality in (55) is easily obtained as follows: By (53), we have
where the last step used Barrow’s inequality (2). It is not difficult to know the equality conditions of inequality chain (55). The proof of Theorem 5 is completed. □
4. Some Open Problems
In this section, we present some interesting conjectures as open problems.
For the second inequality in (27), the author guesses that the following refinement is valid.
Conjecture 1.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
A similar conjecture is as follows.
Conjecture 2.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
Remark 4.
The last inequality of (57) is actually equivalent to
which is Conjecture 2 posed by the author in [15].
Next, we give a reversed inequality similar to the previous inequality (34).
Conjecture 3.
For any interior point P of the triangle , it holds that
Considering generalizations of the first inequality of (47), the author presents the following conjecture:
Conjecture 4.
Let P be an interior point of a convex polygon () and , , and ). Then
Remark 5.
We have the following refinement of the Erdös–Mordell inequality (see [10]):
in which the first inequality can easily be generalized to polygons by applying inequality (30) and . The author believes that the second inequality can also be generalized to polygons as follows:
Conjecture 5.
Let P be an interior point of convex polygon (), and let denote the distances from P to the side lines and ). Then
Similarly, we put forward the following conjecture:
Conjecture 6.
Let P be an interior point of convex polygon (), and let denote the angle bisectors of ( and ). Then
If the above inequality holds, then we can obtain the following refinement of inequality (3):
where .
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares that he has no competing interest.
References
- Erdös, P. Problem 3740. Am. Math. Mon. 1935, 42, 396. [Google Scholar]
- Mordell, L.J.; Barrow, D.F. Solution of problem 3740. Am. Math. Mon. 1937, 44, 252–254. [Google Scholar]
- Avez, A. A short proof of a theorem of Erdös and Mordell. Am. Math. Mon. 1993, 100, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abi-Khuzam, F.F. A trigonometric inequality and its geometric applications. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2000, 3, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsina, C.; Nelsen, R.B. A visual proof of the Erdös-Mordell inequality. Forum Geom. 2007, 7, 99–102. [Google Scholar]
- Bankoff, L. An elementary proof of the Erdös-Mordell theorem. Am. Math. Mon. 1958, 65, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazarinoff, D.K. A simple proof of the Erdös-Mordell inequality for triangles. Mich. Math. J. 1957, 4, 97–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komornik, V. A short proof of the Erdös-Mordell theorem. Am. Math. Mon. 1997, 104, 57–60. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H. Another proof of the Erdös-Mordell theorem. Forum Geom. 2001, 1, 7–8. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J. A new proof of the Erdös-Mordell inequality. Int. Electron. J. Geom. 2011, 4, 114–119. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J. A sharpening of the Erdös-Mordell inequality and its applications. J. Chongqing Norm. Univ. 2005, 2, 12–14. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J. On a geometric inequality of Oppenheim. J. Sci. Arts 2012, 18, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J. Sharpened versions of the Erdös-Mordell inequality. J. Inequal. Appl. 2015, 2015, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J. Refinements of the Erdös-Mordell inequality. Barrow’s inequality and Oppenheim’s inequality. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J. Three inequalities involving the distances from an interior point to the sides of a triangle. Int. J. Geom. 2017, 1, 49–60. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J. New refinements of the Erdös-Mordell inequality. J. Math. Inequal. 2018, 12, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J. Three Sine Inequality; Harbin Institute of Technology Press: Harbin, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Mitrinović, D.S.; Pečarić, J.E. On the Erdös Mordell’s inequality for a polygon. J. Coll. Arts Sci. Chiba Univ. 1986, 19, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
- Mitrinović, D.S.; Pečarić, J.E.; Volence, V. Recent Advances in Geometric Inequalities; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA; London, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Malešević, B.; Petrović, M.; Popkonstantinović, B. On the extension of the Erdös-Mordell type inequalities. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 17, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maleševic, B.; Petrović, M. Barrow’s inequality and signed angle bisectors. J. Math. Inequal. 2014, 8, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozeki, N. On Paul Erdös-Mordell inequality for the triangle. J. Coll. Arts Sci. Chiba Univ. A 1957, 2, 247–250. [Google Scholar]
- Oppenheim, A. The Erdö-Mordell inequality and other inequalities for a triangle. Am. Math. Mon. 1961, 68, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oppenheim, A. New inequalities for a triangle and an internal point. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 1961, 53, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pech, P. Erdös-Mordell inequality for space n-gons. Math. Pannon. 1994, 5, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
- Sakurai, A. Vector analysis proof of Erdös’ inequality for triangles. Am. Math. Mon. 2012, 8, 682–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Wu, S.H.; Debnath, L. Generalization of the Wolstenholme cyclic inequality and its application. Comput. Math. Appl. 2007, 53, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Gueron, S.; Shafrir, I. A weighted Erdös-Mordell inequality for polygons. Am. Math. Mon. 2005, 112, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bottema, O.; Djordjević, R.Z.; Janić, R.R.; Mitrinovicć, D.S.; Vasić, P.M. Geometic Ineqalities; Wolters-Noordhoff: Groningen, The Netherlands, 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Chu, X.G. The proofs of two conjectures involving triangle inequalities. J. Huaihua Univ. 2007, 5, 71–75. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).