Abstract
This paper considers a topological transversality theorem for multivalued maps with continuous, compact selections. Basically, this says, if we have two maps F and G with continuous compact selections and , then one map being essential guarantees the essentiality of the other map.
MSC:
47H10; 54H25
1. Introduction
In this paper, we consider multivalued maps F and G with continuous, compact selections and in this setting. The topological transversality theorem will state that F is essential if and only if G is essential (essential maps were introduced by Granas [1] and extended by Precup [2], Gabor, Gorniewicz, and Slosarsk [3], and O’Regan [4,5]). For an approach to other classes of maps, we refer the reader to O’Regan [6], where one sees that ≅ in the appropriate class can be challenging. However, the topological transversality theorem for multivalued maps with continuous compact selections has not been considered in detail. In this paper, we present a simple result that immediately yields a topological transversality theorem in this setting. In particular, we show that, for two maps F and G with continuous compact selections and , then one map being essential (or d–essential) guarantees that the other is essential (or d–essential). We also discuss these maps in the weak topology setting.
2. Topological Transversality Theorem
We will consider a class of maps. Let be a completely regular space (i.e., a Tychonoff space) and an open subset of .
Definition 1.
We say if is a continuous, compact map; here, denotes the closure of U in E.
Definition 2.
We say if and for ; here, denotes the boundary of U in E.
Definition 3.
We say if with and there exists a selection of F; here, denotes the family of nonempty subsets of E.
Remark 1.
Let Z and W be subsets of Hausdorff topological vector spaces and and F a multifunction. We say if W is convex and there exists a map with , for and for each ; here, . Let E be a Hausdorff topological vector space (note topological vector spaces are completely regular), U an open subset of E and paracompact. In this case, we say if is a compact map. Now, [7] guarantees that there exists a continuous, compact selection of F.
Definition 4.
We say if and for .
Definition 5.
We say is essential in if for any selection of F and any map with there exists a with .
Remark 2.
If is essential in and if is any selection of F then there exists a with (take in Definition 5), so in particular there exists a with .
Definition 6.
Let . We say in if there exists a continuous, compact map with for any and (here ), and .
Remark 3.
A standard argument guarantees that ≅ in is an equivalence relation.
Definition 7.
Let . We say in if for any selection (respectively, ) of F (respectively, of G) we have in .
Theorem 1.
Let E be a completely regular topological space, U an open subset of , and is essential in . In addition, suppose
Then, F is essential in .
Proof.
Let be any selection of F and consider any map with . We must show that there exists a with . Let be any selection of G. Now, (1) guarantees that there exists a continuous, compact map with for any and (here, ), and . Let
Now, (note G is essential in ) and is closed (note h is continuous) and so is compact (note h is a compact map). In addition, note since for any and . Then, since E is Tychonoff, there exists a continuous map with and . Define the map r by , where is given by . Note that (i.e., r is a continuous compact map) with (note if then ) so since G is essential in there exists a with (i.e., ). Thus, so and thus . ☐
Let E be a topological vector space. Before we prove the topological transversality theorem, we note the following:
- (a)
- If with , then in . To see this, let and note is a continuous, compact map with for any and (note ).
Theorem 2.
Let be a topological vector space and an open subset of . Suppose that F and G are two maps in with in . Now, F is essential in if and only if G is essential in .
Proof.
Assume G is essential in . We will use Theorem 1 to show F is essential in . Let be any selection of F, be any selection of G and consider any map with . Now, (a) above guarantees that in and this together with in (so in ) and Remark 3 guarantees that in . Thus, (1) holds so Theorem 1 guarantees that F is essential in . A similar argument shows that, if F is essential in , then G is essential in . ☐
Theorem 3.
Let be a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space, an open subset of and . Assume the zero map is in . Then, the zero map is essential in .
Proof.
Note for (i.e., F is the zero map) and let be any selection of F. Note for . Consider any map with . We must show there exists a with . Let
Note is a continuous, compact map so [8] guarantees that there exists a with . If , then , a contradiction since . Thus, and so . ☐
Now, we consider the above in the weak topology setting. Let be a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space and a weakly open subset of where C is a closed convex subset of X. Again, we consider a class of maps.
Definition 8.
We say if is a weakly continuous, weakly compact map; here, denotes the weak closure of U in C.
Definition 9.
We say if and for ; here, denotes the weak boundary of U in C.
Definition 10.
We say if with and there exists a selection of F.
Definition 11.
We say if and for .
Definition 12.
We say is essential in if for any selection of F and any map with there exists a with .
Definition 13.
Let . We say in if there exists a weakly continuous, weakly compact map with for any and (here ), and .
Definition 14.
Let . We say in if for any selection (respectively, ) of F (respectively, of G) we have in .
Theorem 4.
Let be a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space and a weakly open subset of where C is a closed convex subset of X. Suppose and is essential in and
Then, F is essential in .
Proof.
Let be any selection of F and consider any map with . Let be any selection of G. Now, (2) guarantees that there exists a weakly continuous, weakly compact map with for any and (here ), and . Let
Recall that , the space X endowed with the weak topology, is completely regular. Now, is weakly closed and is in fact weakly compact with . Thus, there exists a weakly continuous map with and . Define the map r by and note with . Since G is essential in , there exists a with . Thus, so . ☐
An obvious modification of the argument in Theorem 2 immediately yields the following result.
Theorem 5.
Let be a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space and a weakly open subset of where C is a closed convex subset of X. Suppose F and G are two maps in with in . Now, F is essential in if and only if G is essential in .
Now, we consider a generalization of essential maps, namely the d–essential maps [2]. Let be a completely regular topological space and an open subset of . For any map let , with given by , and let
be any map with values in the nonempty set ; here, .
Definition 15.
Let with . We say is d–essential if, for any selection of F and any map with , we have that ; here, and .
Remark 4.
If is –essential, then, for any selection of F (with ), we have
so there exists a with (so, in particular, ).
Theorem 6.
Let E be a completely regular topological space, U an open subset of , , d is defined in(3), , with and . Suppose is d–essential and
Then, is d–essential.
Proof.
Let be any selection of F and consider any map with . We must show ; here, and . Let be any selection of G. Now, (4) guarantees that there exists a continuous, compact map with for any and (here ), , and ; here, . Let be given by and let
Now, is closed, compact and so there exists a continuous map with and . Define the map r by and . Now, with . Since is d–essential, then
Now, since , we have
so, from the above and Equation (5), we have . ☐
Theorem 7.
Let E be a completely regular topological space, U an open subset of , and d is defined in (3). Suppose F and G are two maps in with , and in . Then, is d–essential if and only if is d–essential.
Proof.
Assume is d–essential. Let be any selection of F, be any selection of G and consider any map with . If we show (4), then is d–essential from Theorem 6. Now, in together with in (so in ) guarantees that in . To complete (4), we need to show ; here, and . We will show this by following the argument in Theorem 6. Note in and let be a continuous, compact map with for any and (here ), and . Let be given by and let
Now, and there exists a continuous map with and . Define the map r by and . Now, with so, since is d–essential, then . Now, since , we have (see the argument in Theorem 6) and, as a result, we have . ☐
Remark 5.
It is also easy to extend the above ideas to other natural situations. Let be a (Hausdorff) topological vector space (so automatically completely regular), a topological vector space, and an open subset of . In addition, let be a linear (not necessarily continuous) single valued map; here, is a vector subspace of . Finally, will be a linear, continuous single valued map with an isomorphism (i.e., a linear homeomorphism); for convenience we say . We say if and we could discuss essential and d–essential in this situation.
Now, we present an example to illustrate our theory.
Example 1.
Let be a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space, an open subset of , and paracompact. In this case, we say that if (see Remark 1) is a compact map. Let and assume for and . Then, in . To see this, let be any selection of F and let be given by . Note that and for and so in . Now, Theorems 2 and 3 guarantee that F is essential in .
3. Conclusions
In this paper, we prove that, for two set-valued maps F and G with continuous compact selections and , then one being essential (or d–essential) guarantees that the other is essential (or d–essential).
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Granas, A. Sur la méthode de continuité de Poincaré. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1976, 282, 983–985. [Google Scholar]
- Precup, R. On the topological transversality principle. Nonlinear Anal. 1993, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabor, G.; Gorniewicz, L.; Slosarski, M. Generalized topological essentiality and coincidence points of multivalued maps. Set-Valued Anal. 2009, 17, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Regan, D. Essential maps and coincidence principles for general classes of maps. Filomat 2017, 31, 3553–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Regan, D. Topological transversality principles and general coincidence theory. An. Stiint. Univ. Ovidius Constanta Ser. Mat. 2017, 25, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Regan, D. Topological fixed point theory for compact multifunctions via homotopy and essential maps. Topol. Appl. 2019, 265, 106819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.J.; Park, S.; You, Z.T. Remarks on fixed points, maximal elements and equilibria of generalized games. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1999, 233, 581–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Himmelberg, C.J. Fixed points of compact multifunctions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1972, 38, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).