Abstract
By means of the residual implication on a frame L, a degree approach to L-continuity and L-closedness for mappings between L-cotopological spaces are defined and their properties are investigated systematically. In addition, in the situation of L-topological spaces, degrees of L-continuity and of L-openness for mappings are proposed and their connections are studied. Moreover, if L is a frame with an order-reversing involution , where for , then degrees of L-continuity for mappings between L-cotopological spaces and degrees of L-continuity for mappings between L-topological spaces are equivalent.
1. Introduction
Since Chang [1] introduced fuzzy set theory to topology, fuzzy topology and its related theories have been widely investigated such as [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The degree approach that equips fuzzy topology and its related structures with some degree description is also an essential character of fuzzy set theory. This approach has been developed extensively in the theory of fuzzy topology, fuzzy convergence and fuzzy convex structure. Yue and Fang [19] introduced a degree approach to and separation properties in -fuzzy topological spaces. Shi [20,21] defined the degrees of separation axioms which are compatible with -fuzzy metric spaces. Li and Shi [22] introduced the degree of compactness in L-fuzzy topological spaces. Pang defined the compact degree of -fuzzy convergence spaces [23] and degrees of () separation property as well as the regular property of stratified L-generalized convergence spaces [24]. All of the above-mentioned research mainly equipped spatial properties with some of the degree descriptions.
Actually, special mappings between structured spaces and the structured space itself can also be endowed with some degrees. Xiu and his co-authors [25,26] defined degrees of fuzzy convex structures, fuzzy closure systems and fuzzy Alexandrov topologies and discussed their properties. Xiu and Pang [27] gave a degree approach to special mappings between M-fuzzifying convex spaces. In [28], Pang defined degrees of continuous mappings and open mappings between L-fuzzifying topological spaces to describe how a mapping between L-fuzzifying topological spaces becomes a continuous mapping or an open mapping in a degree sense. Liang and Shi [29] further defined the degrees of continuous mappings and open mappings between L-fuzzy topological spaces and investigated their relationship. Li [30] defined the degrees of special mappings in the theory of L-convex spaces and investigated their properties. Xiu and Pang [27] developed the degree approach to M-fuzzifying convex spaces to define the degrees of M-CP mappings and M-CC mappings.
Following this direction, we will focus on the case of L-cotopological spaces and L-topological spaces in this paper. By means of L-closure operators and L-interior operators, we will consider degrees of L-continuity and L-closedness for mappings between L-cotopological spaces as well as degrees of L-continuity and L-openness for mappings between L-topological spaces and will investigate their properties systematically.
2. Preliminaries
In this paper, let L be a frame, X be a nonempty set and be the set of all L-subsets on X. The bottom element and the top element of L are denoted by ⊥ and ⊤, respectively. A residual implication can be defined by The operators on L can be translated onto in a pointwise way. In this case, is also a complete lattice. Let and denote the smallest element and the largest element in , respectively
Let be a mapping. Define and by for and , and for and , respectively.
Using the residual implication, the concept of fuzzy inclusion order of L-subsets is introduced.
Definition 1
([2,31]). The fuzzy inclusion order of L-subsets is a mapping which satisfying for each ,
Lemma 1
([2,31]). Let be a mapping. Then, for each and , the following statements hold:
- (1)
- if and only if .
- (2)
- implies .
- (3)
- implies .
- (4)
- .
- (5)
- .
- (6)
- .
In the following, we will only use to represent the fuzzy inclusion order of L-subsets on both and , not or . This will not lead to ambiguity in the paper.
Definition 2
([1,18,32,33]). Let be a subset of . is called an L-cotopology on X if it satisfies:
(LCT1) ;
(LCT2) if , then ;
(LCT3) if , then .
For an L-cotopology on X, the pair is called an L-cotopological space.
If also satisfies:
(SLCT) for each , ,
then it is called a stratified L-cotopology and the pair is called a stratified L-cotopological space.
A mapping is called L-continuous provided that, for each implies .
A mapping is called L-closed provided that, for each implies .
Definition 3
([18,32,33]). An L-closure operator on X is a mapping which satisfies:
(LCL1) ;
(LCL2) ;
(LCL3) ;
(LCL4) .
For an L-closure operator on X, the pair is called an L-closure space.
A mapping is called L-continuous provided that
It was proved in [18,32,33] that L-cotopologies and L-closure operators are conceptually equivalent with transferring process for each and . Correspondingly, L-continuous mappings between L-cotopological spaces and L-continuous mappings between L-closure spaces are compatible. In the sequel, we treat L-cotopological spaces with their L-continuous mappings and L-closure spaces with their L-continuous mappings equivalently. We will use to represent tacitly.
Definition 4
([1,18,32,33]). An L-topology on X is a subset which satisfies:
(LT1) ;
(LT2) if , then ;
(LT3) if , then .
For an L-topology on X, the pair is called an L-topological space.
A mapping is called L-continuous provided that for each implies .
A mapping is called L-open provided that for each implies .
Definition 5
([18,33]). An L-interior operator on X is a mapping which satisfies:
(LN1) ;
(LN2) ;
(LN3) ;
(LN4) .
For an L-interior operator on X, the pair is called an L-interior space.
A mapping is called L-continuous provided that
It was proved in [18,33] that L-topologies and L-interior operators are conceptually equivalent with transferring process for each and . Correspondingly, L-continuous mappings between L-topological spaces and L-continuous mappings between L-interior spaces are compatible. In the sequel, we treat L-topological spaces with their L-continuous mappings and L-interior spaces with their L-continuous mappings equivalently. We will use to represent tacitly.
Definition 6
([3,32]). An L-filter on X is a mapping which satisfies:
(F1) , ;
(F2) for each .
Let denote the family of all L-filters on X.
Definition 7
([3]). An L-fuzzy convergence on X is a mapping which satisfies:
(L1) , ;
(L2) implies .
For an L-fuzzy convergence on X, the pair is called an L-fuzzy convergence space.
Theorem 1
([3]). For an L-topological space , let be its interior operator and be the L-neighborhood filter defined by for each . Then, the mapping defined by
is an L-fuzzy convergence on X.
3. Degrees of -Continuity and -Closedness for Mappings between -Cotopological Spaces
In this section, we mainly define degrees of L-continuity of mappings and L-closedness of mappings to equip each mapping between L-cotopological spaces with some degree to be an L-continuous mapping and an L-closed mapping, respectively. Then, we will study their connections in a degree sense. Moreover, f always denotes a mapping from X to Y and g always denotes a mapping from Y to Z in the following sections.
Definition 8.
Let and be L-cotopological spaces. Then,
(1) defined by
is called the degree of L-continuity for f.
(2) defined by
is called the degree of L-closedness for f.
Remark 1.
(1) If , then for all , which is exactly the definition of L-continuous mappings between L-closure spaces. As we claimed that L-continuous mappings between L-cotopological spaces and L-continuous mappings between L-closure spaces are compatible, we don’t distinguish them. Therefore, we defined the degree of L-continuity of mappings between L-cotopological spaces by using L-continuous mappings between their induced L-closure spaces.
(2) If , then for all . This is exactly the equivalent form of L-closed mappings between L-cotopological spaces by means of the corresponding L-closure operators.
Lemma 2.
Let and be mappings. Then, for each , and , the following statements hold:
- (1)
- . If f is injective, then the equality holds.
- (2)
- . If f is surjective, then the equality holds.
- (3)
- .
- (4)
- .
Proof.
The proofs are routine and are omitted. □
Theorem 2.
Let and be L-cotopological spaces. Then,
Proof.
It follows from the definition of that
This implies
as desired. □
Theorem 3.
(1) If is the identity mapping, then and .
(2) If is a constant mapping between stratified L-cotopological spaces with the constant , then .
Proof.
(1) Straightforward,
(2) It follows immediately from the definition of that
Since is stratified, we know . Then, for each and , it follows that
Furthermore, we have
This implies that for each and . Therefore, we have . □
Next, we give another characterizations of degrees of L-continuty for mappings between L-cotopological spaces.
Theorem 4.
Let and be L-cotopological spaces. Then,
Proof.
By the definition of , it follows that
This means
as desired. □
Theorem 5.
Let and be L-cotopological spaces. Then,
Proof.
By the definition of , it follows that
This implies
as desired. □
In L-cotopological spaces, compositions of L-continuous mappings (resp. L-closed mappings) are still L-continuous mappings (resp. L-closed mappings). Now, let us give a degree representation of this result.
Theorem 6.
For L-cotopological spaces , and , the following inequalities hold:
(1)
(2)
Proof.
(1) By Theorem 4, we have
(2) Adopting the proof of (1), it can be verified directly. □
Next, we investigate the connections between degrees of L-continuity and that of L-closedness.
Theorem 7.
For L-cotopological spaces , and , if g is injective, then the following inequality holds:
Proof.
If g is an injective mapping, then we have for all . Then, it follows that
□
Theorem 8.
For L-cotopological spaces , and , if g is surjective, then the following inequality holds:
Proof.
If f is a surjective mapping, then for all . Then, it follows that
This shows
Then, we have
□
4. Degrees of -Continuity and -Openness for Mappings between -Topological Spaces
In this section, we mainly define degrees of L-continuity and L-openness to equip each mapping between L-topological spaces with some degree to be an L-continuous mapping and an L-open mapping, respectively. Then, we will study their connections in a degree sense.
Definition 9.
Let and be L-topological spaces.
(1) defined by
is called the degree of L-continuity for f.
(2) defined by
is called the degree of L-openness for f.
Remark 2.
(1) If , then for all , which is exactly the definition of L-continuous mappings between L-interior spaces.
(2) If , then for all . This is exactly the equivalent form of L-open mappings between L-topological spaces by means of the corresponding L-interior operators.
Theorem 9.
Let and be L-topological spaces. Then,
Proof.
□
Theorem 10.
Let and be L-topological spaces. Then,
Proof.
On one hand,
On the other hand,
Therefore, □
In L-topological spaces, compositions of L-continuous mappings (resp. L-open mappings) are still L-continuous mappings (resp. L-open mappings). Now, let us give a degree representation of this result.
Theorem 11.
For L-topological spaces , and , the following inequalities hold:
(1)
(2)
Proof.
(1) By Definition 9, we have
(2) Adopting the proof of (1), it can be verified directly. □
Next, we investigate the connections between degrees of L-continuity and that of L-openness.
Theorem 12.
For L-topological spaces , and , if f is surjective, then the following inequality holds:
Proof.
Since f is surjective, we have for all . Then, it follows that
This shows
Then, we have
□
Theorem 13.
For L-topological spaces , and , if f is injective, then the following inequality holds:
Proof.
Since g is injective, we have for all . Then, it follows that
□
Theorem 14.
Suppose that L is a frame with an order-reversing involution , where for . For an L-topological space , is an L-cotopology and .
Proof.
It is easy to verify that is an L-cotopology and . □
Theorem 15.
Suppose that L is a frame with an order-reversing involution , where for . For L-topological spaces and , .
Proof.
By Theorems 5 and 14,
□
5. Conclusions
In this paper, we equip each mapping between L-cotopological spaces with some degree to be an L-continuous mapping and an L-closed mapping, and equip each mapping between L-topological spaces with some degree to be an L-continuous mapping and an L-open mapping. From this aspect, we could consider the degrees of L-continuity, L-closedness and L-openness for a mapping even if the mapping is not a continuous mapping, a closed mapping or an open mapping. By means of these definitions, we proved that the degrees of L-continuity, L-closedness and L-openness for mappings naturally suggest lattice-valued logical extensions of properties related to continuous mappings, closed mappings and open mappings in classical topological spaces to fuzzy topological spaces. Moreover, if L is a frame with an order-reversing involution , where for , then degrees of L-continuity for mappings between L-cotopological spaces and degrees of L-continuity for mappings between L-topological spaces are equivalent.
As future research, we will consider the following two problems:
(1) By means of the degree method, we can also define the degrees of some topological properties. For example, we can use the convergence degree of a fuzzy ultrafilter to define the compactness degree of an L-topological space.
(2) Based on the degrees of L-continuity, L-openness and L-closedness for mappings, we can further define the degrees of L-homeomorphism in a degree. We only need to equip a bijective mapping with the degrees of L-continuity and L-openness.
Author Contributions
Z.X. contributed the central idea. Z.X. and Q.L. writed this manuscript and revised it.
Funding
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11871097,11971448), the Project (2017M622563) funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation and the Project (KYTZ201631, CRF201611, 2017Z056) Supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of CUIT.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Chang, C.L. Fuzzy topological spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1968, 24, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, J.M. Stratified L-ordered quasiuniform limit spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2013, 227, 51–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jäger, G. A category of L-fuzzy convergence spaces. Quaest. Math. 2001, 24, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Q.; Li, L.Q.; Lv, Y.R.; Zhao, F.; Zou, J. Connectedness for lattice-valued subsets in lattice-valued convergence spaces. Quaest. Math. 2019, 42, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubiak, T. On Fuzzy Topologies. Ph.D.Thesis, Adam Mickiewicz, Poznan, Poland, 1985.
- Lowen, E.; Lowen, R.; Wuyts, P. The categorical topological approach to fuzzy topology and fuzzy convergence. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1991, 40, 347–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.Q.; Jin, Q.; Hu, K. Lattice-valued convergence associated with CNS spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2019, 370, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.Q. p-Topologicalness—A Relative Topologicalness in ⊤-Convergence Spaces. Mathematics 2019, 7, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, B. Convergence structures in M-fuzzifying convex spaces. Quaest. Math. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, B.; Shi, F.G. Strong inclusion orders between L-subsets and its applications in L-convex spaces. Quaest. Math. 2018, 41, 1021–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, B.; Shi, F.G. Fuzzy counterparts of hull operators and interval operators in the framework of L-convex spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2019, 369, 20–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, B.; Xiu, Z.Y. An axiomatic approach to bases and subbases in L-convex spaces and their applications. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2019, 369, 40–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, F.G.; Xiu, Z.Y. (L, M)-fuzzy convex structures. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 3655–3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sostak, A.P. On a fuzzy topological structure. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (Suppl. Ser. II) 1985, 11, 89–103. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, B.; Li, Q.; Xiu, Z.Y. A categorical approach to abstract convex spaces and interval spaces. Open Math. 2019, 17, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Pang, B. Coreflectivities of (L, M)-fuzzy convex structures and (L, M)-fuzzy cotopologies in (L, M)-fuzzy closure systems. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiu, Z.Y.; Pang, B. M-fuzzifying cotopological spaces and M-fuzzifying convex spaces as M-fuzzifying closure spaces. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.X. An enriched category to many valued topology. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2007, 158, 349–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, Y.L.; Fang, J.M. On separation axioms in I-fuzzy topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2006, 157, 780–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, F.G. (L, M)-fuzzy metric spaces. Indian J. Math. 2010, 52, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, F.G. Regularity and normality of (L, M)-fuzzy topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2011, 182, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.Y.; Shi, F.G. Degrees of fuzzy compactness in L-fuzzy topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2010, 161, 988–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, B.; Shi, F.G. Degrees of compactness of (L, M)-fuzzy convergence spaces and its applications. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2014, 251, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, B. Degrees of separation properties in stratified L-generalized convergence spaces using residual implication. Filomat 2017, 31, 6293–6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Wu, X.Y.; Xiu, Z.Y. A degree approach to relationship among fuzzy convex structures, fuzzy closure systems and fuzzy Alexandrov topologies. Open Math. 2019, 17, 913–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiu, Z.Y.; Li, Q.G. Relations among (L, M)-fuzzy convex structures, (L, M)-fuzzy closure systems and (L, M)-fuzzy Alexandrov topologies in a degree sense. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2019, 36, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiu, Z.Y.; Pang, B. A degree approach to special mappings between M-fuzzifying convex spaces. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 35, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, B. Degrees of continuous mappings, open mappings, and closed mappings in L-fuzzifying topological spaces. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2014, 27, 805–816. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, C.Y.; Shi, F.G. Degree of continuity for mappings of (L, M)-fuzzy topological spaces. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2014, 27, 2665–2677. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q.H.; Huang, H.L.; Xiu, Z.-Y. Degrees of special mappings in the theory of L-convex spaces. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2019, 37, 2265–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bělohlávek, R. Fuzzy Relational Systems, Foundations and Principles; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York, NY, USA; Boston, MA, USA; Dordrecht, The Netherlands; London, UK; Moscow, Russia, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Höhle, U.; Šostak, A.P. Axiomatic foudations of fixed-basis fuzzy topology. In Mathematics of Fuzzy Sets: Logic, Topology, and Measure Theory, Handbook Series; Höhle, U., Rodabaugh, S.E., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, USA; Dordrecht, The Netherlands; London, UK, 1999; Volume 3, pp. 123–173. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.M.; Luo, M.K. Fuzzy Topology; World Scientific Publication: Singapore, 1998. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).