Abstract
In this paper, we solve three Diophantine equations: and with and prime . We obtain all the non-negative integer solutions by using elementary methods and the database of elliptic curves in “The L-functions and modular forms database” (LMFDB).
MSC:
11A15; 11D61; 11D72; 14H52
1. Introduction
For various fixed pairs of integers , the exponential Diophantine equations and have received a lot of attention in recent decades [,,,,,]. A summary of the most recent works on the equation can be found in [,]. One can find a comprehensive study of exponential Diophantine equations in [].
In Section 2, we list some results needed in the proof of our main theorems. In Section 3, we solve three Diophantine equations: and with non-negative integer k and prime . The author of [] first solved the equation . When , the equation was solved in []. When and , the equation was solved in []. We could not generally solve the equation since we need to use the database of []. But for , it was solved in []. For and , it was also solved in []. Our works in this paper can be taken as a generalization of some results in [,,]. We point out that our methods used in this paper can be applied to the equation for any specific value of prime p with with the help of database LMFDB []. “elliptic curve cryptography” (ECC) is a type of public-key cryptography that utilizes the mathematical properties of elliptic curves. A future study of the equation with general p may have some potential applications in cryptography since these equations are related to elliptic curves.
2. Preliminaries
The following lemma was conjectured by Eugène Charles Catalan in 1844 and proved in 2002 by Preda Mihăilescu [].
Lemma 1
(Catalan–Mihăilescu Theorem []). If a, b, x, and y are integers and , then the Diophantine equation has a unique integer solution .
In 2003, Leu and Li proved the following result [].
Lemma 2
([]). The Diophantine equation has exactly three positive rational integral solutions, namely , and .
The discriminant of the elliptic curve over is .
Using discriminant, the following lemma can be found in the database of elliptic curves in “The L-functions and modular forms database” (LMFDB) [].
Lemma 3
([]). The three elliptic curves over and their integer solutions are listed below.
(1) has only two integer solutions .
(2) has only two integer solutions .
(3) has no integer solutions.
3. Solutions of the Equations and
In this section, we solve three Diophantine equations and with and prime .
In the proofs of the theorems, we frequently use the following facts which can be found in any standard elementary textbook.
(1): Let p be an odd prime and the Legendre symbol. We have if and only if (mod 8), or equivalently, if and only if (mod 8).
(2): For any odd number a, we have (mod 8).
Theorem 1.
For and prime (mod 8), the Diophantine equation
has only the following non-negative integer solutions:
- 1.
- ;
- 2.
- ;
- 3.
- ;
- 4.
- ;
- 5.
- ;
- 6.
- ;
- 7.
- ,
where n is any positive integer.
Proof.
If , then by Lemma 1.
For , through Equation (1), we have . Hence, since . Therefore, we obtain for some non-negative integer m. We write Equation (1) as
Letting , we have . Hence, , . We also have , so, . In summary, we obtain .
We have the following four possibilities, namely, .
Case 1. and .
In this case, we have . Hence, . It is clear that is impossible since . For , is even. So is . Therefore, . So, we obtain or .
Case 1.1. .
We have . Since , we obtain .
Case 1.1.1. .
We have , . From , we have , . Letting , we have .
Case 1.1.2. .
We have , , , and . Letting , we have .
Case 1.2. .
From , we obtain . Hence, we have and , we obtain , and by Lemma 1. Hence, , , and . Letting , we obtain
Case 2. and .
In this case, we have , so, . If , then since both sides must be even. We obtain , which is impossible. Hence, we obtain and . Since , by Lemma 1, we know and . If , we obtain which is contrary to . So, , , , , and . Letting since , we have .
Case 3. and .
In this case, we have , so, .
Case 3.1. .
We have .
Case 3.1.1. .
Since , we obtain , there are two possibilities.
Case 3.1.1.1. .
We have , , , , and . Letting since , we obtain .
Case 3.1.1.2. .
We have , , , , and . Letting since , we obtain .
Case 3.1.2. .
From , since and , we obtain . Hence, . By Lemma 1, we obtain . Namely, which is impossible. So, there is no solution in this case.
Case 3.2. .
From , we know since both sides are even. We obtain .
Case 3.2.1. .
We have . Hence, .
Case 3.2.1.1. .
We obtain , , , , and . Letting , we have again (We obtain this solution first in Case 1.1.1.).
Case 3.2.1.2. .
We obtain , , , , and . Letting , we have again (We obtain this solution first in Case 1.1.2.).
Case 3.2.2. .
In , from , we obtain . Hence, . By Lemma 1, we know , , , . So, , , . Letting , we obtain again (we obtain this solution first in Case 1.2.).
Case 4. and .
In this case, we have . Hence, we have , which is impossible. □
Theorem 2.
For and prime , the Diophantine equation
has only the following non-negative integer solutions:
- 1.
- ;
- 2.
- ;
- 3.
- ,
where n is any positive integer.
Proof.
For , we have .
For , we have .
From now on, we have . If , then we obtain , which is absurd. Hence, we obtain . Taking module p in Equation (2), we obtain . So for some integers, , since .
Equation (2) can be written as
Letting , we have and .
Hence, , .
There are four cases, namely, .
Case 1. and .
We have , or .
It is clear that and is even. Hence, is also even. So, we obtain .
Now we have , or . By Lemma 1, we obtain and . Because , we know . After simple calculation, we obtain . Letting , we obtain .
Case 2. and .
We have , or .
It is clear that . So, we obtain since both sides are even. Then , a contradiction. Hence, there is no solution in this case.
Case 3. and .
We have , or .
It is clear that and is even. Hence, is also even. So, we obtain .
Now we have , or . By Lemma 1, we obtain . Same as before, we have . After simple calculation, we obtain . Letting , we obtain . This solution has been obtained in Case 1.
Case 4. and .
Since due to and , we obtain , a contradiction. Hence, there is no non-negative integer solution in this case. □
Theorem 3.
For , the Diophantine equation
has only the following non-negative integer solutions:
- 1.
- ;
- 2.
- ;
- 3.
- ;
- 4.
- ;
- 5.
- :
- 6.
- ;
- 7.
- ,
where n is any positive integer.
Proof.
If , then .
For , taking module 3 in Equation (3), we have . It is clear that this congruence holds only if .
There are two cases, namely, and .
Case 1. and .
Letting , , we obtain , which implies and with since .
So we have
Since the right side is odd, we obtain and . By Lemma 1, we receive .
For , we obtain , , , and . Letting , we obtain a solution .
For , we obtain , , , and . Hence, .
Letting , we obtain a solution .
Case 2. and .
Let , where , and .
Case 2.1. .
From Equation (3), we obtain , . Hence, we obtain , which is contrary to .
Case 2.2. .
From Equation (3), we obtain , or . Since , we know is odd. So, we obtain and
By Lemma 2, we obtain .
For , we obtain , , , . Letting , we obtain the solution .
For , we obtain , , . From , we obtian . Since k is odd, letting , we obtain . Letting , we obtain the solution .
Case 2.3. .
From Equation (3), we obtain . Both and are odd. We obtain and . If , we obtain , which is absurd. So, we obtain . Because and x is odd, we obtain . Now, we only need to solve the following equation
We consider three possibilities. Namely, .
Case 2.3.1. .
We have , by Lemma 3, we obtain . So, we obtain , , , , and . From , we obtain and . Letting , we obtain a solution .
Case 2.3.2. .
We have , or ; by Lemma 3, we obtain . Hence, we have , , , , and . Letting , we obtain a solution .
Case 2.3.3. .
We have , or by Lemma 3; there is no non-negative integer solution. □
Author Contributions
Investigation, T.L. and A.C.; Writing—original draft, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support this study are openly available in reference [].
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the referees for their valuable comments.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Borah, P.B.; Dutta, M. On the Diophantine equation 7x + 32y = z2 and its generalization. Integers 2022, 22, A29. [Google Scholar]
- Gayo, W.S.; Bacani, J.B. On the Diophantine equation (Mp)x + (Mq + 1)y = z2. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2021, 14, 396–403. [Google Scholar]
- Le, M.H. A note on the Diophantine equation x2 + by = cz. Acta Arith. 1995, 71, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Mina, R.J.S.; Bacani, J.B. On the solutions of the Diophantine equation px + (p + 4k)y = z2 for prime pairs p and p + 4k. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2021, 14, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terai, N. The Diophantine equation x2+qm = pn. Acta Arith. 1993, 63, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Yuan, P.Z.; Wang, J.B. On the Diophantine equation x2 + by = cz. Acta Arith. 1998, 84, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shorey, T.N.; Tijdeman, R. Exponential Diophantine Equations; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Sroysang, B. More on the Diophantine equation 2x + 3y = z2. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2013, 84, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, B.X. On equations (−1)αpx + (−1)β(2k(2p + 1))y = z2 with Sophie Germain prime p. Involve 2024, 17, 503–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Li, Y. On the equation (−1)αpx + (−1)β(2k(2p − 1))y = z2 for prime pairs (p,2p − 1). Integers 2024, 24, A64. [Google Scholar]
- The L-Functions and Modular Forms Database (LMFDB). Available online: https://www.lmfdb.org/EllipticCurve/Q/ (accessed on 20 July 2024).
- Mihăilescu, P. Primary cycolotomic units and a proof of Catalan’s conjecture. J. Reine Angew. Math. 2004, 572, 167–195. [Google Scholar]
- Leu, M.G.; Li, G.W. On the Diophantine equation 2x2 + 1 = 3n. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2003, 131, 3643–3645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).