Abstract
In this paper, we develop two new theorems relating to the series of floor and ceiling functions. We then use these two theorems to develop more than forty distinct novel results. Furthermore, we provide specific cases for the theorems and corollaries which show that our results constitute a generalisation of the currently available results such as the summation of first n Fibonacci numbers and Pascal’s identity. Finally, we provide three miscellaneous examples to showcase the vast scope of our developed theorems.
Keywords:
ceiling function; floor function; Faulhaber’s formula; Fibonacci numbers; geometric series; partial summations MSC:
11B68; 11A99
1. Introduction
The concept of an integer part of was introduced by Legendre in the late 18th century, and Gauss introduced the “[x]” notation for the same. Following these discoveries, in the second half of 20th century, the terms “floor” and “ceiling” functions [1] were coined. The “floor of x” is mathematically defined as , whereas the “ceiling of x” is defined as . These two functions and their respective series have a wide range of applications in computer science [1]. Along with them, two of the other most famous findings in the theory of numbers are a partial sum—“the Faulhaber’s Formula” [2] and a sequence—“the Fibonacci Numbers”, both of which have very significant implication in different fields of mathematics and other sciences. The Fibonacci sequence, as it is widely known, frequently occurs in mathematics as well as across different patterns in nature. However, more than that, it is applied at different instances in computer science [1]. Moreover, as recently as 2020, the applications of Faulhaber’s formula and its extensions [3] are being found in different areas of advanced sciences such as quantum gravity [4].
Due to such significances of partial summations, researchers have studied their properties of such partial sums and finite sequences and their relations in recent decades [3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. McGown and Parks [6] generalised Faulhaber’s formula to non-integer powers using the Zeta function [15]. Schumacher [3] extended the formula for real values , whereas Merca [7] provided an alternative of Faulhaber’s formula as a finite discrete convolution. Moreover, Orosi [9] provided a simple derivation of the formula.
Outline of the Article
In this series of two papers, we aim to generalise the scope of infinite series and partial summations using the floor and ceiling functions.
“Part I” specifically deals with the finite summations and is structured as follows. Section 2 provides the list of preliminary results useful for our study. Section 3 consists of lemmas and theorems which lay the foundations for the results discussed in Section 4, Section 5 and Section 6. Section 6 is followed by Section 7 which is devoted to the corollaries of the results of the previous sections. Section 8 gives different results related to the Fibonacci numbers. Section 9 provides results on specific values—especially Section 9.3.2, which gives two alternate formulae for Faulhaber’s formula. Section 10 provides proof for two of the corollaries using the simple yet powerful principle of mathematical induction. Finally, Section 11 concludes the article with a discussion of the scope for future studies.
2. Preliminaries
The following results along with the results discussed in the previous section are useful for our study and hence we explicitly provide them together in this section.
2.1. Faulhaber’s (Bernoulli’s) Formula
An expression of the sum of the q powers of the first n positive integers (Faulhaber’s Formula [16]) can be equated as:
where is Bernoulli’s number of the second kind, defined as:
and is a Bernoulli polynomial of order n.
2.2. Floor and Ceiling Functions
The floor function [17] of any real number x (denoted by ) gives the greatest integer not greater than x, i.e., . For example, and .
In the same way, the ceiling function [17] (denoted by ) gives the smallest integer not smaller than x, i.e., . For example, and .
From above, we can see that if and only if .
2.3. Finite Lower-Order Polylogarithm
An important finite summation formula [18] of the form for values of and is given as:
For example, for , the equation reduces to:
2.4. Fibonacci Number
The Fibonacci number [19] is given by the formula:
Furthermore, the summation of first n Fibonacci numbers—“Fibonacci Series”—can be obtained with the following formula:
2.5. Pascal’s Identity
Pascal’s identity [5] and its alternate form can be written as follows:
3. Foundations
Lemma 1
(Floor–Ceiling Lemma). Let such that and (i.e., n is the largest integer such that ). Furthermore, let and then
Proof.
Let denote the function that yields the number of consecutive integers, k, for which (or ), i.e., gives the number of repetitions of m for a particular n. Then, we have
Now, we know that:
It follows that n is at least and at most strictly less than .
Theorem 1
(Floor–Ceiling Theorem). Let such that and (i.e., n is NOT the largest integer such that ). Furthermore, let and then
Or equivalently
Proof.
Let for some such that and ; then, from Lemma 1, we have:
Furthermore, let for smallest such that then, from the previous equation, we have
Here, it can be easily seen that for as
.
Therefore, k + z = .
Hence, by simplifying the previous equation, we obtain:
Again, we have:
Now, as it is known that for the smallest , we obtain
and hence Equation (10) is obtained.
Remark 1.
Alternatively, using , one can obtain which leads to an alternate version of Equation (10) as
Lemma 2
(Ceiling–Floor Lemma). Let such that and (i.e., n is the largest integer such that ). Furthermore, let and then
Proof.
Let denote the function that yields the number of consecutive integers, k, for which (or ), i.e., gives the number of repetitions of m for particular n. Then, we have
Now, we know that
Theorem 2
(Ceiling–Floor Theorem). Let such that and (i.e., n is NOT the largest integer such that ). Furthermore, let and then
Or equivalently
Proof.
Let for some such that and ; then, from Lemma 2, we have:
Furthermore, let for the largest possible such that ; then, from the previous equation, we have
Here, it can be easily seen that for as
.
Therefore, k + z = .
Hence, by simplifying the previous equation, we obtain:
Again, we have:
Now, as it is known that for the largest , we obtain and hence Equation (16) is obtained.
4. Shah Formulae
Theorem 3
(F-Shah Formula). Let and then, the following equation holds true:
Proof.
Consider Equation (11) with and ; then, we have
Hence, for reduces as:
Now, as it is known that ; then, by substitution, the previous equation reduces to Equation (18). □
Theorem 4
(C-Shah Formula). Let and ; then, the following equation holds true:
5. Floor and Ceiling Geometric Series
Theorem 5
(Floor Geometric Series). Let ; then, the following equation holds true:
Proof.
By substituting in Equation (11), we obtain:
Furthermore, with a basic manipulation, we arrive at Equation (20). □
Theorem 6.
(Ceiling Geometric Series). Let ; then, the following equation holds true:
6. Floor and Ceiling Telescoping Equivalent Formulae
Theorem 7
(C-Telescoping Identity). Let and a sequence ; then, the following equation holds true:
Proof.
Theorem 8
(F-Telescoping Identity). Let and a sequence ; then, the following equation holds true:
7. Corollaries
7.1. Corollaries of Section 4
Corollary 1.
For any and , the following equation holds true:
Corollary 2.
For any and , the following equation holds true:
Corollary 3.
For any and , the following equation holds true:
Corollary 4.
For any and , the following equation holds true:
Corollary 5.
For any and , the following equation holds true:
Corollary 6.
For any and , the following equation holds true:
Remark 2.
Corollaries 5 and 6 can be independently proven using the principle of mathematical induction (see Section 10).
Hypothesis 1.
No result from Theorems 3 and 4 and Corollaries 1–6 can be proven using the principle of mathematical induction other than Corollaries 5 and 6.
Corollary 7.
For any a of the form where and , the following equation holds true:
where denotes Faulhaber’s formula (see Section 2.1).
Proof.
By substituting in Equation (26) assumes the form:
Now, as both ,
Again, using Faulhaber’s formula for , the previous equation reduces to Equation (30). □
Corollary 8.
For any a of the form where and , the following equation holds true:
Proof.
By substituting in Equation (27) assumes the form:
Now, as both ,
Again, using Faulhaber’s formula for , the previous equation reduces to Equation (31). □
Corollary 9.
For any a of the form where and , the following equation holds true:
Corollary 10.
For any a of the form where and , the following equation holds true:
7.2. Corollaries of Section 5
Corollary 11.
For any a of the form where , , the following equation holds true:
Proof.
By substituting in Equation (20), we obtain
Corollary 12.
For any a of the form where , , the following equation holds true:
7.3. Corollaries of Section 6
Corollary 13.
For any and a finite sequence , the following equation holds true:
Corollary 14.
For any and a finite sequence , the following equation holds true:
8. Relations of Fibonacci Numbers
Theorem 9
(Shah–Pingala Formula of order q). Let and let be the Fibonacci number of the sequence, then the following equation holds true:
Theorem 10
(Floor Fibonacci Series). Let and let be the Fibonacci number of the sequence then the following equation holds true:
Proof.
Replace function f with the sequence in Equation (11) with . □
Theorem 11
(Ceiling Fibonacci Series). Let and let be the Fibonacci number of the sequence, then the following equation holds true:
Proof.
Replace function f with the sequence in Equation (17) with . □
9. Results for Specific Values
9.1. Specific Values—Section 4
9.2. Specific Values—Section 5
9.3. Specific Values—Section 6
9.3.1. Generalised Pascal Identities
Ceiling Pascal Identity
By substituting in Equation (22), we arrive at the “ceiling Pascal identity”:
Floor Pascal Identity
By substituting in Equation (23), we arrive at “floor Pascal identity”:
9.3.2. Sum of Powers of First n Natural Numbers
By substituting , Equation (36) reduces as:
Whereas by substituting , Equation (37) reduces as:
Both of which relate to in terms of lower powers .
9.4. Specific Values—Section 8
9.4.1. For
The Shah–Pingala formula for reduces to the “Fibonacci Series” (Section 2.4).
9.4.2. For
Using Equation (38), the Shah–Pingala Formula of order 1 can be obtained as:
9.4.3. For
Furthermore, equations for can be derived using the same method.
10. Proofs Using Principle of Mathematical Induction
In this section, the proofs by principle of mathematical induction (for Corollaries 5 and 6) mentioned in Remark 2 are given.
Proofs
Corollary 5: let be the following statement:
Basic step of induction: is clearly true:
Inductive step: assume is true for some . One shall prove
It follows that
Consider such that ,
This splits into two cases:
(I): & (II):
Case (I):
Here,
Again
Now, as and , we obtain
Therefore, for case (I).
Case (II):
Therefore, for case (II).
Hence,
Hence, is true whenever is true.
Hence, by principle of mathematical induction, is true
Corollary 6: let be the following statement:
Basic step of induction: is clearly true:
Inductive step: assume is true for some . One shall prove :
It follows that:
Consider such that :
This splits into two cases: (I): & (II):
Case (I):
Furthermore, for case (I), we have and
This yields
Therefore, for case (I).
Case (II):
Therefore, for case (II).
Hence,
Hence, is true whenever is true.
Hence, by principle of mathematical induction, is true
11. Conclusions and Future Scope
We developed theorems of floor and ceiling functions and used them as the basis to provide more than 40 new results (as theorems or formulae or as their corollaries). Furthermore, these theorems and their corollaries create the possibility of finding hundreds of more results. In particular, implementing our theorems on the results of Schumacher’s extended version of Faulhaber’s formula [3] may have some more applications [4] in different fields. Considering the vast number of available finite summations, studying, analysing and providing results for all of them is not possible in the scope of one paper. Hence, we discussed just a few of the results which could be derived from the discussed lemmas, theorems and corollaries.
Therefore, we put forth the open problem for future studies to implement our results to different available finite summations (i.e., finite sums involving (1) exponential function, (2) logarithmic function, (3) trigonometric functions, (4) permutations and combinations, (5) extended Faulhaber’s formula [3] or partial summations of any other available functions).
To inspire future studies, we list a few examples for reference:
(1) For the binomial coefficient :
or (2) for the generalised Harmonic number :
or (3) for logarithms:
Author Contributions
Conceptualisation, D.S.; methodology, D.S.; validation, M.S., M.O.-L., E.L.-C. and R.S.; formal analysis, M.S., M.O.-L. and R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S.; writing—review and editing, D.S., M.S. and E.L.-C.; supervision, M.S. and E.L.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Author Leon-Castro acknowledges support from the Chilean Government through FONDECYT initiation grant No. 11190056.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not Applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Nishant Doshi of Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India, for bringing us a very interesting exercise, from which we were able to work on the primitive forms of the results. The authors would equally like to thank Kenneth Beitler for contacting us and for making a very helpful suggestion for proving the results. We are especially grateful to have benefited from the guidance of Anand Sengupta and Atul Dixit of the Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, by the means of video conference and discussions. Furthermore, we are thankful to Meghna Parikh and Bhashin Thakore for their valuable contributions to the first draft.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Knuth, D. The Art of Computer Programming, 3rd ed.; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 79–84. [Google Scholar]
- Apostol, T. Introduction to Analytic Number Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Schumacher, R. An Extended Version of Faulhaber’s Formula. J. Integer Seq. 2016, 19, 16.4.2. [Google Scholar]
- Sahlmann, H.; Zilker, T. Quantum Surface Holonomies for Loop Quantum Gravity and Their Application to Black Hole Horizons. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 026009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacMillan, K.; Sondow, J. Proofs of Power Sum and Binomial Coefficient Congruences Via Pascal’s Identity. Am. Math. Mon. 2011, 118, 549–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGown, K.; Parks, H. The generalization of Faulhaber’s formula to sums of non-integral powers. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 330, 571–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Merca, M. An Alternative to Faulhaber’s Formula. Am. Math. Mon. 2015, 122, 599–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parks, H. Sums of non-integral powers. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 297, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Orosi, G. A Simple Derivation Of Faulhaber’s Formula. Appl. Math. E Notes 2018, 18, 124–126. [Google Scholar]
- Edwards, A. A Quick Route to Sums of Powers. Am. Math. Mon. 1986, 93, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gregg, C. Relations between the sums of powers of the natural numbers. Math. Gaz. 1960, 44, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chorlton, F. Finite Sums of Powers of the Natural Numbers. Math. Gaz. 1998, 82, 95–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beardon, A. Sums of Powers of Integers. Am. Math. Mon. 1996, 103, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knuth, D. Johann Faulhaber Furthermore, Sums Of Powers. Math. Comput. 1993, 61, 277–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frontczak, R.; Srivastava, H.M.; Tomovski, Z. Some Families of Apéry-Like Fibonacci and Lucas Series. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conway, J.; Guy, R. The Book of Numbers; Copernicus: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Graham, R.L.; Knuth, D.E.; Patashnik, O. Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- The Computation of Polylogarithms. Technical Report 15–92. Available online: https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/1992/110/ (accessed on 3 March 2022).
- Hardy, G.H.; Wright, E.M. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 5th ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1980. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).