Next Article in Journal
Nitrate Promotes Germination Under Inhibition by NaCl or High Concentration of Glucose
Next Article in Special Issue
Water Shortage Strongly Alters Formation of Calcium Oxalate Druse Crystals and Leaf Traits in Fagopyrum esculentum
Previous Article in Journal
Auxin: Hormonal Signal Required for Seed Development and Dormancy
Previous Article in Special Issue
NH4+ Toxicity, Which Is Mainly Determined by the High NH4+/K+ Ratio, Is Alleviated by CIPK23 in Arabidopsis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutritional Value of Savory Herb (Satureja hortensis L.) and Plant Response to Variable Mineral Nutrition Conditions in Various Phases of Development

by
Natalia Skubij
1,
Katarzyna Dzida
1,*,
Zbigniew Jarosz
1,
Karolina Pitura
1 and
Monika Jaroszuk-Sierocińska
2
1
Institute of Horticulture Production, Subdepartment of Plant Nutrition, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka Street, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
2
Institute of Soil Science, Environment Engineering and Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 7 Leszczyńskiego Street, 20-069 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(6), 706; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060706
Submission received: 24 April 2020 / Revised: 18 May 2020 / Accepted: 28 May 2020 / Published: 1 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineral Nutrition and Plant Abiotic Stress Resistance)

Abstract

:
Mineral nutrition and plant ontogeny influence both the physiological balance between nutrients in a plant and determine the proper nutritional status of a plant, which is necessary to realize the yielding potential of a cultivated species. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of nitrogen doses (0, 4, 8, 12, 16 g N·m−2) and plant development phases (the beginning and full flowering) on the content of macroelements and changes in ionic ratios occurring in the herb of the summer savory cv. ‘Saturn’. The two-factor experiment was carried out in a random-block design with five replications. The mineral nitrogen nutrition applied increased the concentration of total nitrogen and its mineral forms in the plants. There was a change in ion homeostasis in the individual stages of the ontogenesis process, i.e., a higher content of P, K, Ca, and S in the initial flowering phase as well as Mg and Cl in the full flowering phase. The increase in the availability of mineral nitrogen in the soil solution caused a decrease in total sorption capacity, reducing the potential of the soil for saturation with alkaline cations.

1. Introduction

In the current millennium, the improvement of human health is a priority for many individuals dealing with food, including herb, vegetable, and fruit growers. Mineral elements play an important role in growth, as they help to maintain fitness and prevent human diseases [1]. Among crops, herbs are valuable sources of easily absorbable mineral substances [2]. Summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.) is a widely known annual herbaceous plant from the Lamiaceae family cultivated in many countries worldwide. The herb of this plant has carminative and digestive properties as well as antidiarrheal, antispasmodic, and antibacterial activity [3]. Due to the healing effects and a significant nutritional value, the herbaceous parts of the stems and leaves of this species are used in the food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries [1,4]. The composition of Satureja hortensis L. raw material has been found to contain significant amounts of minerals, including potassium (1.68–3.38 mg∙kg−1 DM), phosphorus (0.31–0.72 mg∙kg−1 DM), calcium (1.08–2.84 mg∙kg−1 DM), magnesium (0.25–0.61 mg∙kg−1 DM), iron (242–726 mg∙kg−1 DM), and sodium (0.007–0.013 mg∙kg−1 DM) [5,6,7,8,9]. Given the high amount of mineral elements in the aerial parts of S. hortensis L. [2], it can potentially serve as a dietary source of human-essential minerals.
The mineral status of plants is important not only for the nutritional value of food, but also for the growth, development, and yielding of crops [1]. Plants are exposed to the influence of adverse environmental factors, which are known as abiotic stresses, excessive soil salinity, and the absence of mineral salts. Mineral nutrition is one of the environmental factors causing changes in the ionic balance in the sorption complex and in the soil solution, but also affecting the assimilation process and concentration of nutrients in plant tissues. At the same time, too intensive mineral fertilization is considered one of the causes of anthropogenic soil salinity, which causes salt stress in plants [10]. The salts of carbonic, sulfuric, and hydrochloric acids as well as calcium, magnesium, and sodium bases are responsible for changing the degree of saturation of the soil solution with mineral components [11]. The direct interaction of the salt causes a decrease in water availability, lowering its potential in soil solution [12]. As a result, plants growth is limited most often as a result of plant ionic balance disturbances or osmotic stress [13]. The excess amounts of salts accumulated in the chloroplasts can exert toxic effects on photosynthesis through destabilization of the protein complex and the destruction of photosynthetic pigments, leading to oxidative stress in plants [10,14]. However, both the excess and deficiency of specific mineral nutrient induce a number of disorders in the metabolism of plants, preventing the use of its full crop-forming potential. An insufficient content or absence of nutrients available to plants contribute to disorders of plasma membrane stability, which leads to e.g., changes in their selective permeability to ions and organic compounds produced by the process of photosynthesis [13].
Mineral nutrition may induce the development of abiotic stress in plants; on the other hand, it helps to neutralize the effects of stress. An optimal amount of nutrients supports the proper functioning of plants, which allows their organisms to increase tolerance through the regeneration of damage or starting alternative metabolic pathways. Moreover, nitrogen fertilization has a significant impact on plant resistance, as it indirectly participates in the production of secondary metabolites in support of defense response to stress. However, it directly affects the synthesis of proteins, including specific protein classes such as proteins affecting membrane properties, calcium binding proteins, osmoprotectant accumulation proteins, chaperones, and defense proteins type late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) [10]. The task of these proteins is to participate in mechanisms that increase plant resistance. In addition, nitrogen is one of the basic elements forming the plant structure. Most (75%) of this nutrient is contained in leaves, mainly in chloroplasts, as part of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCO) [15]. It plays an important role in the production of a substantial amount of plant biomass; additionally, it is a component of amino acids, proteins, nucleic acids, coenzymes, amides, chlorophyll, and cytokinins [16,17]. It participates in the transport of protons and electrons in photosynthesis and respiration and in the path of signal transduction between organs [17]. Nitrogen balance in plants also defines the quantitative demand for minerals necessary to maximize the efficiency of a given physiological process [18]. The importance of nitrogen in plant development was confirmed by Mumivand et al. [7], who used increasing doses of nitrogen and calcium and noted an increase in the concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese, and zinc in the herb of Satureja hortensis L. cv. Saturn. Szewczuk and Mazur [19] studied the effect of nitrogen and developmental phase on the content of mineral components in nettle leaves and stems. They found a significant effect of the increasing doses of nitrogen (up to 300 kg N∙ha−1) on the content of nitrates and manganese in the plants in all development phases. It has also been shown that nitrogen fertilization not only increases the N content in plant tissues, but also changes the concentration of other nutrients [20,21,22,23].
The change in the accumulation of nutrients in the plant is somewhat due to the different rates of uptake by the roots from the soil solution [24,25]. These differences cause that cations and anions accumulate in plants in uneven amounts, demonstrating synergistic or antagonistic interactions [26]. The individual functions of particular mineral elements are important for the proper course of biochemical changes and physiological reactions during the plant development cycle [25,27]. In addition to the direct effects of ingredients on plant metabolism, their interaction is also important and often more important than their individual action [26,28]. Thus, the mineral nutrient uptake is also influenced by ontogenetic variability, which is not limited to the variability of plant development phases, but occurs within the phases as well [29]. The accumulation of mineral compounds and biomass gain do not proceed simultaneously but have a species-specific rhythm and dynamics. Ontogenetic diversity is especially important, as it largely determines the time of harvest and the chemical composition and the health-enhancing properties of raw material [8,19].
In times of climate change and the intense increase in the food needs of the growing population, it is important to develop agricultural practices that will increase plant resistance to changing environmental conditions. Considering various determinants of the mineral composition of plants, detailed research was carried out into the impact of varied nitrogen fertilization and phase of summer savory development on the content of macroelements in the raw material. The main interactions between individual mineral components in the savory raw material inducing a change in its mineral state were analyzed as well. Soil sorption properties determining the uptake of minerals by plants from the soil solution were also investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Nitrogen in Savory Raw Material

Among the factors of plant growth and development, nitrogen is included in the group of the main (superior) and supporting (detailed) factors [18] that affect the metabolic processes in a plant by modifying the amount of biomass produced in a given development phase [17]. In the present experiment, there was a significant effect of the nitrogen dose and the plant development phase on total nitrogen content (from 3.35% to 3.89% DM) (Figure 1) and its two mineral forms (NH4+ and NO3) (Table 1) in the herb of the summer savory cv. Saturn. A positive effect of nitrogen fertilization on nitrogen accumulation was found in the summer savory [7,30], basil [31], coriander, Italian fennel, and star anise [32], sagebrush tarragon [9], caraway [21], sand plantain [33], and rosemary [34].
The herbs in the initial flowering phase were characterized by a higher total nitrogen concentration. Golcz et al. [35] reported a similar relationship in their research on different cultivars of basil, i.e., increased content of nitrogen in the initial flowering phase relative to full flowering. A significant impact of the development cycle on the change in the nitrogen concentration was found in Thymus vulgaris L., Melisa officinalis L. [36], and in Urtica dioica L. [19]. The variation in the nitrogen value during the development cycle of Satureja hortensis L. was associated with nitrogen remobilization in the plant during the growing season. The soil is the main source of N uptake during the vegetative phase, whereas nitrogen assimilated in chloroplasts is utilized at the time of development of generative organs [18]. Therefore, a decrease in the content of total nitrogen was noted in the subsequent stages of development of the summer savory. This relationship was also related to the availability of nitrogen forms. Regardless of the type of mineral fertilizer, plants absorb nitrogen as a cation (NH4+) or an anion (NO3) [16,24]. Nitrates are the preferred nitrogen sources for most crop plants. However, before nitrate is included in the metabolic processes of the synthesis of organic nitrogen compounds, it must be reduced with the participation of nitrate reductase. Under the influence of increasing doses of nitrogen, this enzyme, shows a variable intensity of action in individual plant organs, with the strongest activity in stems and leaf blades at the early stages of vegetation [24]. In the present experiment, the savory cv. Saturn plants in the initial flowering phase were characterized by higher nitrate nitrogen levels. Szewczuk and Mazur [19] reported a similar relationship between the developmental stages of the common nettle, in which the vegetative and flower bud stages exhibited higher levels of NO3 anions than the flowering phase.
Along with the increase in the nitrogen dose, the content of both studied forms of nitrogen increased in the Saturn cv. herb (Table 1). An increase in the concentration of the analyzed forms of nitrogen after the application of differential nitrogen fertilization was noted in the leaves of basil cv. Kasia and cv. Wala [31], garden savory herb [30], and rocket leaves [37,38]. Plant nitrogen uptake preferences depend on the species and environmental factors [23,39]. An important issue is the synergistic and antagonistic relationship between the forms of nitrogen and the cations or anions taken up by plants [26,40].

2.2. Other Macroelements Present in the Herb

The nitrogen functions in the plant also involve determination of the physiological balance between nitrogen and other minerals [28,40]. Macronutrients regulate many metabolic processes and indirectly influence nitrogen metabolism; hence, they play an important role in the crop-forming potential of cultivated plants [18]. The analysis of the nutrient content in the aboveground parts of the summer savory cv. Saturn showed a number of significant relationships (Table 2).
The content of potassium in the savory herb was on average 2.01% DM and was significantly dependent on the applied nitrogen dose. An increase in the concentration of potassium ions was recorded in plants fed with the lower doses of nitrogen. A similar tendency of the influence of nitrogen on the assimilation of potassium cations was noted in the savory [7,30] and sand plantain [33]. An inverse relationship was found for Ocimum basilicum L. cv. Kasia and cv. Wala [31] as well as for Rosmarinus officinalis L. [34], in which plants fertilized with higher doses of nitrogen were characterized by a higher concentration of potassium. In the conducted tests, an increased amount of potassium was noted in plants harvested at the initial stage of flowering. A similar result of a higher amount of potassium in the earlier stages of development than at the time of full flowering was reported by Karimi et al. [8], who analyzed the aboveground and underground parts of raw summer savory. Research conducted by Szewczuk and Mazur [19] showed that the raw material of nettle harvested in the vegetative and flower bud stages was characterized by higher K content than in the flowering phase. The variable potassium accumulation in the savory cv. Saturn plants after applying higher doses of nitrogen is also associated with ionic interactions between the nutrients [17,24]. Potassium is usually present in the plant in quite a high concentration, especially in meristematic tissues and in the phloem. As a nutrient, it participates in osmoregulation and affects, among others, the regulation of the activity of enzymes determining the nitrogen balance in plants [41]. Changing the availability of potassium in a plant organism causes disturbances in nitrogen metabolism, inducing a change in the proportion between nitrogen fractions [16]. Potassium has a positive interaction with the NH4+ form; however, it is also an accompanying cation during the transport of the NO3 anion in the xylem from the root system, where it accumulates to the aboveground parts [16]. In the summer savory cells, a positive correlation between K+ and NO3 was noted (Figure 2a). In field conditions, the interaction of nitrogen and potassium is associated with an increase in the efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers [42]. The relationship between nitrogen and potassium ions was also confirmed by Chen et al. [25] and Rietra et al. [26]. Magnesium uptake intensity also induced a change in the assimilation of potassium ions in savory plants. These nutrients show ionic competition for a protein carrier and an ion channel in transport across the cell membrane [17,28]. As a result, there are noticeable disturbances in the uptake of both these elements (Table 1) during the application of increasing doses of nitrogen in the initial flowering phase.
In both development phases of the Saturn cv. plants, a decrease in the magnesium content and an increase in the calcium concentration under the influence of the increasing nitrogen doses were recorded. An important determinant of the assimilation of the ions of these elements is their antagonistic interaction. An optimal relationship between these nutrients is noted at the Ca:Mg ratio in the range from 5:1 to 8:1 [18,28]; at a wider ratio, the Mg2+ uptake is reduced. Thus, the increase in the concentration of nitrogen in the soil solution had an impact on the regulation of magnesium and calcium uptake in the savory plant cells (Figure 3a). An antagonistic interaction of calcium and magnesium ions has been reported in studies by Soltani et al. [9] in plants of Artemisia dracunculus L. A variable assimilation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ relative to different doses of nitrogen was also observed in Satureja hortensis L. cv. Saturn [7] and Ocimum basilicum L. [43]. At the same time, the analysis of the impact of the development cycle in the studied cultivar revealed a greater concentration of magnesium and calcium ions in the initial flowering phase (Table 2). A similar relationship was noted in nettle raw material, which was characterized by a higher content of calcium and magnesium in the vegetative phase [19]. However, Karimi et al. [8] reported a greater number of ions of the nutrients tested in Satureja hortensis L. herb harvested before flowering than during the flowering phase.
In the present experiment, a positive correlation was found between the content of calcium cations and nitrate nitrogen anions in the Satureja hortensis L. ‘Saturn’ herb under the influence of the analyzed factors (Figure 2b). The synergistic interaction in the assimilation of calcium ions and nitrates, also presented in the literature [17,26], is associated with an increase in calcium uptake by plants when the amount of nitrates relative to ammonium ions predominates in the soil solution. This relationship results from the inhibitory influence of NH4+ ions on Ca2+ absorption. It may also result from the fact that nitrate nutrition increases the production of organic acids and, indirectly, the uptake of cations [40]. The cations neutralize the negative charge transfer effect of OH groups on non-volatile organic acids to maintain cytoplasmic acidity. This reaction is the result of a nitrate reduction process prior to their incorporation into plant metabolism [40]. This process is also important, as it increases the uptake of other cations such as potassium, which was also noted in the ionic correlation with nitrates in the savory herb (Figure 2a).
As a component of cell membranes, coenzymes, and buffers, phosphorus participates in photosynthesis and in the metabolism of proteins, carbohydrates, and fats [44]. In addition, it plays an important role in energy storage and maintenance of the structural integrity of membranes [25]. In the herb of the summer savory cv. ‘Saturn’, an increase in the assimilation of phosphorus ions was recorded after application of the increasing doses of nitrogen in relation to the control plants (Table 2). A similar relationship was found in the leaves of Zingiber officinale Rosc. [29]. In turn, a decrease in the phosphorus uptake induced by nitrogen treatment was described by Jalili [22] in summer savory and by David and Rothstein [45] in Fraser fir. A higher phosphorus value was obtained in the initial flowering phase of these plants versus the full flowering phase. The action of phosphorus proceeds throughout the vegetation period, but it is particularly pronounced during the phase of development of the plant root system and the plant maturation stages [46]. During the aging of plants, phosphorus is remobilized from older leaves to younger ones or the developing organs, e.g., seeds [18].
A positive correlation between phosphorus and calcium (Figure 4a) and a negative correlation between phosphorus and magnesium (Figure 4b) were found in the studied Satureja hortensis L. species influenced by the analyzed factors. The relationship between calcium and phosphorus is associated with the fact that mineral phosphorus forms can occur in soil in an exchangeable form and in compounds with calcium, iron, or aluminum. However, the soil reaction is a decisive factor for the use of the particular forms of phosphorus by plants. At the same time, calcium phosphates dissolve more easily in an acidic environment, where their optimum solubility is in the range of pH 5–6 [47]. Since ammonium nitrate fertilizers used in the study can change soil acidity (Table 3), the applied increasing dose of nitrogen contributed to the creation of an environment conducive to the solubility of calcium phosphate forms, hence the possible increase in the content of calcium and phosphorus ions in plant cells. The analysis of the soil used for growing the savory cv. Saturn in the individual developmental phases showed a significant effect of the nitrogen dose on changes in the concentration of mineral components in the soil solution (Table 4). A similar relationship in the assimilation of calcium and phosphorus ions was noted for Cucumis sativus L. cv. Al-Hytham [48]. On the other hand, the interactions between P and Ca are related to the fact that calcium is a cofactor of phospholipases involved in protein phosphorylation [18].
However, the relationship between the increase in the phosphorus content and the decrease in magnesium assimilation in the savory plants (Figure 4b) is associated with the synergistic interaction of phosphorus ions with calcium (Figure 4a). On the other hand, calcium exhibits antagonistic interactions with magnesium ions, which was evident in the present study (Figure 3a).
Sulfur is a structural component of sulfur amino acids, determining the formation of the secondary and tertiary structure of proteins affecting the activity of the nitrogenase and nitrate reductase enzymes [49]. This element influences the course of photosynthesis by regulating the amount of ferredoxin, i.e., a biological electron transmitter, which can lead to reduction in the intensity of nitrate (V) degradation and the accumulation of mineral forms of nitrogen in the plant [50]. The sulfur content in the herb of the savory cv. Saturn ranged from 0.28% to 0.38% DM, depending on the factors examined. The plants accumulated more sulfur in the initial flowering phase than those harvested in the full flowering phase. A similar tendency of sulfur assimilation in the raw material collected in the initial flowering phase was noted for Melissa officinalis L., Salvia officinalis L., and Thymus vulgaris L. after applying NPK mineral fertilization in a two-year vegetation cycle [36]. In the present experiment, there was a visible dependence of the increase in the sulfur concentration in the plants under the influence of the increased nitrogen dose in relation to the control objects. The assimilation of sulfate ions was affected by the value of the N:S ion ratio, which regulates the plant sulfur requirements in relation to its nitrogen demand (the optimal N:S ratio is 10:1 to 12:1) (Figure 3b). The narrowing of the N:S ratio in the plant leads to the accumulation of inorganic sulfur compounds, while the expansion of the N:S ratio increases the uptake of non-protein nitrogen forms. Thus, the optimal level of sulfur allows reduction of the share of non-protein forms of nitrogen in the plant by converting simple forms of nitrogen into proteins [50]. The dependence of ionic sulfur assimilation on nitrogen was also reported in other plant species: Brassica campestris L. cv. Pusa Gold, Eruca sativa Mill. [51], Brassica napus L. [52], and Zea mays L. [53].
In the savory Saturn cv. plants, an increase in the chlorine content was recorded under the influence of the increasing nitrogen doses (Table 2). Both the nitrogen form and chlorine ions affect the ionic balance in the plant. The monovalent nitrate and chloride anions balance out; therefore, the more chlorides, the less nitrates [18,38]. Therefore, with the increase in nitrate anion assimilation, a decrease in the uptake of chloride ions was noted in the herb Saturn cv.; the most intense interaction was visible for the dose of 4 g N∙m−2 (Table 1 and Table 2). This antagonism between Cl and NO3 ions was confirmed in the research by Kafkafi et al. [44] on tomato plants and Bar et al. [54] on avocado, lemon, and mandarin trees. At the same time, the chlorine anion plays an important role in nitrogen metabolism, in which it is responsible for the activation of aspartic synthetase and protein synthesis [55], as well as in the Hill reaction and ATP production during photosynthesis. In addition, this element is an osmoregulator taking part in the opening and closing of stomata along with potassium [27]. Due to its functions, the main site of chlorine accumulation is the vegetative parts of plants. Therefore, the conducted experiment showed a greater assimilation of chloride anions in the Satureja hortensis L. plants in the initial flowering phase than in the full flowering phase. This is confirmed by the results of Kafkafi et al. [41], in which vegetative organs (leaves, stems, root) were characterized by higher chlorine content than generative parts (fruit, seeds) of mature cotton plants.

2.3. Nutrients Available in Soil

Appropriate proportions of cations and anions in the soil sorption complex are one of the basic conditions for the proper nutrition of plants. Violation of these proportions may adversely affect the yield and chemical composition of herbal raw material [18,24]. The analysis of soil from the cultivation of the summer savory cv. Saturn showed significant differences in the nutrient content (Table 4).
Higher concentrations of ammonium nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, and chlorine ions were found in the soil from plants harvested at full flowering. The nitrate nitrogen content was higher in the initial flowering phase. In a study carried out by Nurzyńska-Wierdak and Dzida [56], a higher content of the above-mentioned cations and anions was found in the substrate from the cultivation of marjoram in the flower bud phase. The fertilization of plants with nitrogen had a significant impact on the change in the uptake of components from the soil solution. In the present experiment, the increase in the concentration of chlorides, sulfates, and phosphates was associated with the increasing dose of nitrogen. Nitrates were an exception, as their content in the soil solution decreased due to the increased mineral fertilization. The increase in the concentration of nitrates in plants is affected by significant accumulation of sulfates in the substrate, resulting from their impaired ability to reduce and further processing [50]. However, an increase in the concentration of chloride ions in the soil solution increases the activity of cations, contributing to an increase in their uptake [27]. In the soil from the summer savory cultivation, there was an increased absorption of calcium and magnesium cations, while the activity of potassium and ammonium nitrogen uptake in relation to the applied nitrogen doses was lower. The roots of dicotyledons, such as the Satureja hortensis L. cv. ‘Saturn’, have a higher sorption capacity, taking more divalent than monovalent cations [47], hence the possible increase in calcium and magnesium ion accumulation by the plants studied. At the same time, the sum of exchangeable cations (SEC) in the soil decreased relative to the analyzed research factors (Table 3). The content of exchangeable cations showed certain regularity in the soil solution (Table 4); on this basis, they can be ranked as follows: Ca2+ > K+ > Mg2 + > NH4+. In contrast, hydrolytic acidity (HA) referring to the amount of acid cations present in soil was dependent on the applied nitrogen dose. On average, the highest values were obtained for the highest dose in both studied stages of development. The increase in the mineral fertilization caused a decrease in the total sorption capacity (TSC), reducing the soil potential for the adsorption of cations during the vegetative process of the summer savory plants.
At the same time, there was a decrease in the saturation of the sorption complex with cations relative to the increasing nitrogen dose, with a simultaneous increase in their accumulation, which was greater in the full flowering phase than in the initial flowering phase (Figure 5). The most common explanation of this phenomenon in the literature is the physiologically acidic effect of ammonium nitrate as well as the desorption and leaching of basic cations [47]. The place of base cations (Ca2 +, Mg2 +, K+) is occupied by hydrogen ions (acid cations) secreted to the soil by plant roots, which, according to the perverse rule, leads to desorption of cations from the soil sorption complex [18]. Thus, the decrease in the soil sorption capacity and changes in the degree of saturation with basic cations, as well as the share of individual cations in the sorption complex and therefore in the soil solution, were differentiated by the conditions of plant nutrition and the accumulation of individual ions in plants during the ontogenesis process.
The salt concentration (EC) in the soil environment and appropriate proportions between individual nutrients are extremely important for the proper uptake of water and ingredients dissolved in soil [31,34]. The highest EC value was found after applying the highest nitrogen dose in the initial flowering phase (Table 3). A similar relationship was found in soil used for growing other plant species, e.g., Thymus vulgaris L. and Satureja hortensis L. [57] as well as Ocimum basilicum L. [31]. The comparison of the mineral composition in the plants and in the soil on which they were grown to the concentration of salts in the substrate demonstrated that the anion and cation uptake by the savory plants was not reduced at the increasing value of EC. As reported by Esmaili et al. [58], an excessive salt concentration in the substrate results in reduction in the N, P, Ca, and Mg uptake and an increased concentration of chlorine in plant tissues. However, differences in nutrient uptake by plants also arise under the influence of other factors, such as the soil type or weather conditions. It has also been found that nitrogen fertilization increases plant tolerance to excessive salinity through an improvement in plant nutritional status [58]. The results obtained in this study indicate that nitrogen fertilization facilitated proper nutrient uptake and absorption by the summer savory plants, also during the increasing concentration of salts in the growing soil.
Among many factors affecting the growth and yielding of cultivated plants, soil acidity is mentioned as one of the most important determinants. The optimal pH range for most crops is from 5.5 to 6.5 [18]. In the present experiment, the soil reaction (pH) after harvesting the summer savory cv. Saturn was within the optimal range and increased under the influence of the increasing dose of nitrogen (Table 3). An inverse relationship in the effects of nitrogen on the pH of the soil solution was found in Ocimum basilicum L. [31] as well as Thymus vulgaris L. and Satureja hortensis L. [57].
It is commonly known that the soil reaction has a major influence on the amount of organic matter (Corg). An increase in pH leads to an increase in organic matter solubility, while soil acidification can have either a positive or negative effect. However, in this research, the content of organic matter of soil depends on the balance between many environmental processes and factors, which may be the cause of the low dependence between Corg and pH.

3. Material and Methods

3.1. Plant Material and Experimental Conditions

The field experiments with the summer savory cv. Saturn were carried out in 2014–2016 in an agricultural farm in Zamch (50°18′ N, 23°1′ E), i.e., a village located in southeastern Poland, Lublin Province. The research area is characterized by the shortest the early winter period in the Lublin Province (below 32 days; vegetation period 220–250 days), the highest average air temperatures, and the high water evaporation values. During the years of experimentation, the site had a temperature range from 7.6 to 21.3 °C and a rainfall range from 12 to 135 mmmonth−1. The data on the atmospheric conditions in 2014–2016 were provided by the meteorological station at the RSVE in Nowy Lubliniec.
The summer savory plants were grown on Stagnic Luvisols developed from silt formations. The soil was classified in the good wheat complex and bonitation class IIIb. The granulometric composition of the soil was silt loam (the fraction content according to BN-78/9180-11). The chemical composition of the soil before sowing (mg∙dm−3) was as follows: 22 P-PO4, 46.15 K, 249.5 Ca, 38.85 Mg, 18.75 S-SO4, pH 6.29, and also EC 0.072 (mS∙cm−1).
In all years, the experiment was established in a two-factor random-block design in five replications. The area of a single microplot was 1 m2. Each plot was separated by 0.5 m walkways. The direct sowing experiment was established with the amount of 1 g of seeds per m2. The seeds of the cultivar were produced in the Institute of Natural Fibers and Medicinal Plants on Poznań. The seed sowing date was dependent on the weather conditions determining the onset of the vegetation period (21.05.2014, 10.05.2015, 03.05.2016).
The first study factor was the dose of nitrogen, i.e., 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 g N·m−2, while the second variable was the term of the raw material harvest, i.e., the initial flowering phase and the full flowering of plants. Plant fertilization was supplemented with a dose of magnesium (4 g Mg·m−2), potassium (10 g K·m−2), and phosphorus (3 g P·m−2). The first mineral fertilization treatment was applied a week before sowing the seeds with the following nitrogen first doses: 2N, 4N, 6N, and 8N g·m−2. Additionally, each plot was fertilized with 3 g P·m−2, 5 g K·m−2, and 2 g Mg·m−2. About 21 days after seedling emergence, a second fertilization treatment was applied. It consisted of a second dose of nitrogen (2, 4, 6, and 8 g N·m−2) and the remaining dose of potassium and magnesium. No additional P+K+Mg fertilization was applied in plots with the dose of 0 g N·m−2, as these served as the control objects. The mineral following mineral fertilizers were used in the experiment: ammonium nitrate (34% N), potassium salt (49.8% K), triple granulated superphosphate (20% P), and magnesium heptahydrate sulfate (9.6% Mg; 12.8% S).
During the experiment, the plants were manually weeded without using any herbicides to fight the weed infestation. During the growing season, no diseases or pests were found; therefore, no protection measures were applied.
The first harvest term was established in the first 10 days of August 2014, the second 10 days of August 2015, and the third 10 days of July 2016, i.e., at the beginning of plant flowering. The second harvest was carried out in the full flowering phase, i.e., at day 14 after the onset of flowering (20 August 2014, 1 September 2015, and 4 August 2016).

3.2. Plant Analysis

Plant material samples were collected immediately after plant harvest; the material was dried at a temperature of 60 °C and ground prior to the determinations of the mineral composition of the plants. The total N was determined with the Kjeldahl method, after burning the material in H2SO4 in a Kjeltec System 2002 Distilling Unit automatic analyzer. The contents of N-NH4 and N-NO3 were determined in dry matter (DM) after using the Bremners distillation method, modified by Starck. To determine P, K, Ca, and Mg, the plant material was burnt dry at a temperature of 550 °C. After cooling, the ash was acidified with hydrochloric acid diluted at a ratio of 1:2, and the content of the above-mentioned nutrients was determined. The content of K, Ca, and Mg was determined using atomic absorption spectrometry (ASA) (Aanalyst 300, Perkin Elmer, ‎Waltham, MA, USA). Phosphorus was determined colorimetrically with ammonium metavanadate. Moreover, the content of S-SO4 and Cl was analyzed colorimetrically in a 2.0% acetic acid extract: sulfates with barium chloride and chlorine with silver nitrate. Based on the average results for the individual mineral components, ionic ratios between calcium and magnesium and between nitrogen and sulfur were calculated.

3.3. Soil Analysis

After harvest, the collected soil samples were analyzed in 0.03 M CH3COOH to determine N-NH4, N-NO3, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, and chlorine using the same methods as in the plant material. The soil samples were taken from Ap horizons (from the depth of 0–10 cm). In the cultivated soil, we determined: reaction (pH), potentiometrically, hydrolytic acidity (HA), and sum of exchangeable cations (SEC) using the Kappen method. On its basis, we calculated the value of soil total sorption capacity (TSC), organic carbon (Corg) with the Ťiurin method with modification proposed by Simakov, and the salt concentration in the cultivated soil (EC) with the conductometric method.

3.4. Statistical Analysis

Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to analyze the effects of the nitrogen doses and development phases on savory herbs. The least significant difference was determined for mean comparison at a 5% level of significance (t-Tukey test). The potential interactions between mineral nutrients were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (p ≤ 0.05) (Statistica 13.1 Software). The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). All data were analyzed using the Statistica (Analytical Software, 13.1., PL).

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the mineral nutrition significantly modified the concentration of nutrients in the herb of Satureja hortensis L. cv. Saturn. The highest concentration of most of the analyzed macroelements was noted after application of the lower nitrogen doses (4–8 g N·m−2) in the savory raw material harvested at the initial stage of flowering. At the same time, the developmental changes occurring during ontogenesis had an effect on the intensity of nutrient accumulation and determined the ionic relationships between mineral components in the Saturn cv. plants. An influence of soil sorption properties on the anion and cation uptake from the soil solution depending on the factors studied was noted as well. The study contributed to the determination of the optimal limits of nitrogen nutrition and the development phase that is appropriate for harvesting the raw material of the garden savory cv. Saturn; hence, the results are applicable in agricultural practice. Concurrently, the research factors used have an impact on the quality of the savory raw material and allow determination of the proper nutritional value of the herb, which is increasingly being used as a supplement to the diet in the rapidly growing human population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S., K.D.; methodology, K.D., N.S.; software, Z.J., K.D.; validation, N.S., K.D.; formal analysis, N.S., M.J.-S., and K.P.; investigation, N.S., K.D.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.; writing—review and editing, K.D., N.S.; visualization, N.S., K.P.; funding acquisition, K.D., Z.J. and K.P. All authors have read and agreed to publish version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was financially supported by the statutory funds (OIP/S/51/2020, Institute of Horticulture Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin) from the Polish Ministry of Sciences and Higher Education.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Daniel Skubij for help with field trials and to Joanna Konopińska for analytical help.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grusak, M.A. Enhancing mineral content in plant food products. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2002, 21, 178S–183S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Özcan, M.M. Mineral contents of some plants used as condiments in Turkey. Food Chem. 2004, 84, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jafari, F.; Ghavidel, F.; Zarshenas, M.M. A Critical Overview on the Pharmacological and Clinical Aspects of Popular Satureja Species. J. Acupunct. Meridian Stud. 2016, 9, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kudełka, W.; Kosowska, A. Components of spices and herbs determining their functional properties and their role in human nutrition and prevention of diseases. Zesz. Nauk. Univ. Ekon. Cracow. 2008, 781, 83–111. [Google Scholar]
  5. Seidler-Łożykowska, K.; Kozik, E.; Golcz, A.; Mieloszyk, E. Macroelements and essential oil content in the raw material of the selected medicinal plants species from organic cultivation. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 2006, 51, 161–163. [Google Scholar]
  6. Seidler-Łożykowska, K.; Golcz, A.; Kozik, E.; Kucharski, W.; Mordalski, R.; Wójcik, J. Evaluation of quality of savory (Satureja hortensis L.) herb from organic cultivation. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 2007, 52, 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mumivand, H.; Babalar, M.; Hadian, J.; Tabatabaei, S.M.F. Influence of nitrogen and calcium carbonate application rates on the minerals content of summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.) leaves. Hort. Env. Biot. 2010, 51, 173–177. [Google Scholar]
  8. Karimi, N.; Yari, M.; Ghasmpour, H.R. Identification and comparison of essential oil composition and mineral changes in different phenological stages of Satureja hortensis L. Iran J. Plant Phys. 2012, 3, 577–582. [Google Scholar]
  9. Soltani, F.; Heidari, S.; Azizi, M.; Hadian, J. Influence of Ca(NO3)2 and KNO3 Application on Biomass, Yield, Oil and Mineral Contents of Tarragon in “Ray” Region. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 7, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kłosowska, K. Plant Responses to salinity. Kosmos 2010, 59, 539–549. [Google Scholar]
  11. Siyal, A.A.; Siyal, A.G.; Abro, Z.A. Salt affected soils their identification and reclamation. Pak. J. Appl. Sci. 2002, 2, 537–540. [Google Scholar]
  12. Munns, R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, J. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Boil. 2003, 6, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jaleel, C.A.; Sankar, B.; Sridharan, R.; Panneerselvam, R. Soil salinity alters growth, chlorophyll content, and secondary metabolite accumulation in Catharanthus roseus. Turk. J. Bot. 2008, 32, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  15. Baranauskienė, R.; Venskutonis, P.R.; Viškelis, P.; Dambrauskienė, E. Influence of Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Yield and Composition of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7751–7758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nowacki, E. Nitrogen Management of Crops; PWRiL: Warsaw, Polish, 1980; pp. 47–50, 64–71. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fageria, V.D. Nutrient Interactions in Crop Plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2001, 24, 1269–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grzebisz, W. Fertilization of Crops; PWRiL: Warsaw, Polish, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. Szewczuk, C.; Mazur, M. Influence of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the chemical composition of nettle (Urtica dioica L.) harvested in three development stages, part II mineral content. Acta Scien. Pol. Agricul. 2004, 3, 239–248. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fabek, S.; Toth, N.; Redovniković, I.R.; Ćustić, M.H.; Benko, B.; Žutić, I. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on nitrate accumulation, and the content of minerals and glucosinolates in broccoli cultivars. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2012, 50, 183–191. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kozera, W.; Majcherczak, E.; Barczak, B. Effect of varied NPK fertilisation on the yield size, content of essential oil and mineral composition of caraway fruit (Carum carvi L.). J. Elem. 2012, 8, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jalili, F. The effect of N, P, and micronutrients on yield and essential oil of Satureja hortensis L. Advan. Env. Biol. 2015, 9, 860–865. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ghaly, F.; Baddour, G.; El-Azazy, H. Nitrate Accumulation and Oxalate Formation in Spinach Plants (Spinacia oleracea, L.) as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization levels and Iron Foliar Application. J. Soil Sci. Agric. Eng. 2017, 8, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Baligar, V.C.; Fageria, N.K.; He, Z. Nutrient Use Efficiency in Plants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2001, 32, 921–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, Y.-F.; Wang, Y.; Wu, W.-H. Membrane Transporters for Nitrogen, Phosphate and Potassium Uptake in Plants. J. Integr. Plant Boil. 2008, 50, 835–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rietra, R.; Heinen, M.; Dimkpa, C.O.; Bindraban, P.S. Effects of Nutrient Antagonism and Synergism on Yield and Fertilizer Use Efficiency. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2017, 48, 1895–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Geilfus, C.-M. Chloride in soil: From nutrient to soil pollutant. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 157, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jakobsen, S.T. Interaction between Plant Nutrients: III. Antagonism between Potassium, Magnesium and Calcium. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Plant Soil Sci. 1993, 43, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, M.; Khan, M.M.A.; Naeem, M. Effect of nitrogen on growth, nutrient assimilation, essential oil content, yield and quality attributes in Zingiber officinale Rosc. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2016, 15, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Dzida, K.; Jarosz, Z. Impact of nitrogen-potassium fertilization on the yield and chemical composition of summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.). Acta Agroph. 2006, 7, 879–884. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R.; Rożek, E.; Borowski, B. Response of different basil cultivars to nitrogen and potassium fertilization: Total and mineral nitrogen content in herb. Acta Sci. Pol. Hort. Cult. 2011, 10, 217–232. [Google Scholar]
  32. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on morphological and biochemical traits of some Apiaceae crops under arid regions in Egypt. Nusant. Biosci. 2013, 5, 15–21. [CrossRef]
  33. Hendawy, S.F. Comparative study of organic and mineral fertilization on Plantago arenaria plant. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2008, 4, 500–506. [Google Scholar]
  34. Singh, M.; Rao, R.S.G.; Ramesh, S. Effects of N and K on growth, herbage, oil yield and nutrient uptake patterns in rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) under semi-arid tropical conditions. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2007, 82, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Golcz, A.; Politycka, B.; Seidler-Łożykowska, K. The effect of nitrogen fertilization and stage of plant development on the mass and quality of sweet basil leaves (Ocimum basilicum L.). Herba Pol. 2006, 52, 22–30. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dzida, K.; Zawiślak, G.; Karczmarz, K. Yields and quality of three herbal species from Lamiaceae familly. J. Elem. 2015, 20, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Santamaria, P.; Elia, A.; Serio, F. Effect of Solution Nitrogen Concentration on Yield, Leaf Element Content, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Three Hydroponically-Grown Rocket Salad Genotypes. J. Plant Nutr. 2002, 25, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R. Growth and yield of garden rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) affected by nitrogen and potassium fertilization. Acta Sci. Pol. Hort. Cult. 2009, 8, 23–33. [Google Scholar]
  39. Baričevič, D.; Zupančič, A. The Impact of Drought Stress and/or Nitrogen Fertilization in Some Medicinal Plants. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2002, 9, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jakobsen, S.T. Interaction between plant nutrients: I. theory and analytical procedures. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Scien. 1992, 42, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kafkafi, U.; Xu, G.; Imas, P.; Magen, H.; Tarchitzky, J.; Johnston, A.E. Potassium and chloride in crops and soils: The role of potassium chloride fertilizer in crop nutrition. In IPI Reserch Topics 22; Johnston, A., Ed.; International Potash Institute: Berne, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  42. Johnston, A.E.; Polulton, P.R.; Syers, J.K. Phosphorus, Potassium and Sulfur Cycles in Agricultural Soils; International Fertiliser Society: York, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  43. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R.; Rożek, E.; Borowski, B.; Dzida, K.; Jarosz, Z. Changes in the content of some macronutrients in basil herbage induced by different nitrogen and potassium fertilization rates. J. Elem. 2012, 13, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kafkafi, U.; Valoras, N.; Letey, J. Chloride interaction with nitrate and phosphate nutrition in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). J. Plant Nutr. 1982, 5, 1369–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. David, E.; Rothstein, D. Effects of nitrogen from on nutrient uptake and physiology of Abies fraseri. J. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 219, 69–80. [Google Scholar]
  46. Grzebisz, W.; Potarzycki, J. Factors affecting phosphorus uptake by plants. J. Elem. 2003, 8, 47–60. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sapek, B. Accumulation and release of phosphorus in soil—Sources, processes, causes. Wat. Env. Rur. Are. 2014, 14, 77–100. [Google Scholar]
  48. Abbas, M.K. Effect of calcium nitrate, potassium nitrate and anfaton on growth and storability of plastic houses cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv. Al-Hytham). Am. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 5, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Haneklaus, S.; Bloem, E.; Schnug, E. Sulphur in agroecosystems. Fol. Univ. Tetin. 2000, 204, 17–32. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jamal, A.; Moon, Y.S.; Abdin, M.Z. Sulphur-a general overview and interaction with nitrogen. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2010, 4, 523–529. [Google Scholar]
  51. Fazli, I.S.; Jamal, A.; Ahmad, S.; Masoodi, M.; Khan, J.S.; Abdin, M.Z. Interactive effect of sulphur and nitrogen on nitrogen accumulation and harvest in oilseed crops differing in nitrogen assimilation potential. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 31, 1203–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhao, F.-J.; Bilsborrow, P.E.; Evans, E.J.; McGrath, S.P. Nitrogen to sulphur ratio in rapeseed and in rapeseed protein and its use in diagnosing sulphur deficiency. J. Plant Nutr. 1997, 20, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, N.; Yang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, C.; Jing, J.; Sun, X.; Tian, X. Combined effects of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on maize growth, physiological traits, N and S uptake, and their diagnosis. Field Crop. Res. 2019, 242, 107593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bar, Y.; Apelbaum, A.; Kafkafi, U.; Goren, R. Relationship between chloride and nitrate and its effect on growth and mineral composition of avocado and citrus plants. J. Plant Nutr. 1997, 20, 715–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, W.; He, Z.L.; Yang, X.E.; Mishra, S.; Stoffella, P.J. Chlorine Nutrition of Higher Plants: Progress and Perspectives. J. Plant Nutr. 2010, 33, 943–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R.; Dzida, K. Influence of plant density and term of harvest on yield and chemical composition of sweet marjoram (Origanum majorana L.). Acta Sci Pol. Hort. Cult. 2009, 8, 51–61. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dzida, K. Yield and Biological Value of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) and Savory (Satureia hortensis L.) Herbage Depending on Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilization; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego w Lublinie: Lublin, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  58. Esmaili, E.; Kapourchal, S.; Malakouti, M.; Homaee, M. Interactive effect of salinity and two nitrogen fertilizers on growth and composition of sorghum. Plant Soil Environ. 2008, 54, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Impact of the nitrogen dose and plant development phase on total nitrogen content in the herb savory cv. Saturn (in 2014–2016) (Note: The results are presented as the mean ± SD; means sharing the same letter on a bars do not differ significantly according to Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05; significant effects for the main factors and for interaction between them are indicated with asterisks (*); n.s.—no significance).
Figure 1. Impact of the nitrogen dose and plant development phase on total nitrogen content in the herb savory cv. Saturn (in 2014–2016) (Note: The results are presented as the mean ± SD; means sharing the same letter on a bars do not differ significantly according to Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05; significant effects for the main factors and for interaction between them are indicated with asterisks (*); n.s.—no significance).
Plants 09 00706 g001
Figure 2. Coefficient of correlation between the content of nitrate nitrogen (% DM) and the content of (a) potassium (b) calcium in the herb of the summer savory cv. Saturn in relation to the nitrogen dose and plant development phases (Table 2) (* correlation at p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Coefficient of correlation between the content of nitrate nitrogen (% DM) and the content of (a) potassium (b) calcium in the herb of the summer savory cv. Saturn in relation to the nitrogen dose and plant development phases (Table 2) (* correlation at p < 0.05).
Plants 09 00706 g002
Figure 3. Ionic interaction of nutrients in the herb of the savory of Saturn cv. in the plant development phases depending on the dose of nitrogen: (a) ionic ratio between Ca and Mg (b) ionic ratio between N total and S (based on the mean for 2014–2016).
Figure 3. Ionic interaction of nutrients in the herb of the savory of Saturn cv. in the plant development phases depending on the dose of nitrogen: (a) ionic ratio between Ca and Mg (b) ionic ratio between N total and S (based on the mean for 2014–2016).
Plants 09 00706 g003
Figure 4. Coefficient of correlation between the content of phosphorus (% DM) and the content of (a) calcium and (b) magnesium (% DM) present in the mineral composition of the herb of the summer savory cv. Saturn in relation to the nitrogen dose and plant development phases (Table 2) (* correlation at p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Coefficient of correlation between the content of phosphorus (% DM) and the content of (a) calcium and (b) magnesium (% DM) present in the mineral composition of the herb of the summer savory cv. Saturn in relation to the nitrogen dose and plant development phases (Table 2) (* correlation at p < 0.05).
Plants 09 00706 g004
Figure 5. Degree of saturation of soil with basic cations depending on nitrogen nutrition and development phases of savory plants (mean for 2014–2016) (Note: The results are presented as the mean ± SD; Means sharing the same letter on a bars do not differ significantly according to Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05; significant effects for the main factors and for interaction between them are indicated with asterisks (*); n.s.—no significance).
Figure 5. Degree of saturation of soil with basic cations depending on nitrogen nutrition and development phases of savory plants (mean for 2014–2016) (Note: The results are presented as the mean ± SD; Means sharing the same letter on a bars do not differ significantly according to Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05; significant effects for the main factors and for interaction between them are indicated with asterisks (*); n.s.—no significance).
Plants 09 00706 g005
Table 1. Effect of the nitrogen dose and plant development phases on the content of nitrogen forms of summer savory herb (in 2014–2016) (Note: The results are presented as the mean ± SD; means sharing the same letter in a column do not differ significantly according to Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05; significant effects for the main factors and for interaction between them are indicated with asterisks (*); n.s.—no significance).
Table 1. Effect of the nitrogen dose and plant development phases on the content of nitrogen forms of summer savory herb (in 2014–2016) (Note: The results are presented as the mean ± SD; means sharing the same letter in a column do not differ significantly according to Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05; significant effects for the main factors and for interaction between them are indicated with asterisks (*); n.s.—no significance).
Nitrogen Dose
(g∙m−2)
(B)
N-NH4 (% DM)N-NO3 (% DM)
Plant Development Phases (A)
Beginning of FloweringFull FloweringMain
Effects (B)
Beginning
of Flowering
Full FloweringMain
Effects (B)
00.054 ± 0.031 bc0.013 ± 0.001 cd0.028 ± 0.034 b0.073 ± 0.039 ab0.002 ± 0.001 c0.038 ± 0.045 bc
40.045 ± 0.026 bc0.065 ± 0.036 ab0.055 ± 0.032 a0.080 ± 0.009 ab0.069 ± 0.010 ab0.074 ± 0.010 a
80.021 ± 0.006 c 0.043 ± 0.020 b0.032 ± 0.018 b0.091 ± 0.042 a0.052 ± 0.008 b0.072 ± 0.035 ab
120.092 ± 0.002 a 0.020 ± 0.001 c0.056 ± 0.037 a0.079 ± 0.017 ab0.022 ± 0.003 c0.051 ± 0.032 b
160.015 ± 0.006 c 0.039 ± 0.002 bc0.027 ± 0.013 b0.087 ± 0.021 a0.011 ± 0.002 c0.049 ± 0.042 b
Main effects (A)0.045 ± 0.033 a0.034 ± 0.028 b 0.082 ± 0.027 a0.031 ± 0.026 b
Statistical significance
A**
B**
AxB**
Table 2. Effect of the nitrogen dose and plant development phases on the chemical composition of summer savory herb (in 2014–2016) (Note: For an explanation, see Table 1).
Table 2. Effect of the nitrogen dose and plant development phases on the chemical composition of summer savory herb (in 2014–2016) (Note: For an explanation, see Table 1).
Plant Development Phases (A)Nitrogen Dose
(g∙m−2) (B)
PKCaMgSCl
(% DM)
Beginning of flowering00.33 ± 0.029 bc2.15 ± 0.066 b1.21 ± 0.22 d0.46 ± 0.055 a0.29 ± 0.014 bc0.57 ± 0.116
40.36 ± 0.036 b2.19 ± 0.056 a1.55 ± 0.02 cd0.34 ± 0.013 c0.35 ± 0.012 ab0.34 ± 0.079
80.39 ± 0.042 a2.07 ± 0.117 b1.67 ± 0.11 ab0.35 ± 0.013 c0.36 ± 0.017 ab0.45 ± 0.050
120.37 ± 0.024 ab2.19 ± 0.061 a1.65 ± 0.19 b0.33 ± 0.036 c0.32 ± 0.026 b0.73 ± 0.218
160.38 ± 0.030 ab2.30 ± 0.026 a1.57 ± 0.07 c0.32 ± 0.010 c0.38 ± 0.041 a0.85 ± 0.288
Full flowering00.32 ± 0.063 bc2.15 ± 0.039 b0.77 ± 0.07 e0.45 ± 0.030 a0.30 ± 0.022 bc0.58 ± 0.125
40.31 ± 0.041 c2.20 ± 0.086 a1.61 ± 0.29 bc0.40 ± 0.014 b0.33 ± 0.012 b0.35 ± 0.056
80.39 ± 0.024 a1.69 ± 0.052 c1.70 ± 0.32 a0.44 ± 0.021 a0.32 ± 0.025 b0.57 ± 0.103
120.34 ± 0.012 bc1.57 ± 0.106 c1.65 ± 0.38 b0.40 ± 0.014 b0.29 ± 0.007 c0.69 ± 0.284
160.38 ± 0.026 ab1.50 ± 0.074 c1.37 ± 0.22 d0.30 ± 0.011 c0.28 ± 0.010 c0.80 ± 0.291
Main effects
Beginning of flowering
Full flowering
0.37 ± 0.031 a2.18 ± 0.318 a1.53 ± 0.210.36 ± 0.061 b0.34 ± 0.039 a0.59 ± 0.251
0.35 ± 0.040 b1.82 ± 0.309 b1.42 ± 0.430.40 ± 0.057 a0.30 ± 0.025 b0.60 ± 0.242
Nitrogen dose
00.32 ± 0.047 b2.15 ± 0.052 a0.99 ± 0.28 b0.45 ± 0.043 a0.30 ± 0.018 b0.57 ± 0.117 b
40.34 ± 0.045 ab2.20 ± 0.069a1.58 ± 0.20 a0.37 ± 0.033 b0.34 ± 0.016 a0.34 ± 0.067 c
80.39 ± 0.030 a1.89 ± 0.214 b1.68 ± 0.23 a0.39 ± 0.055 b0.35 ± 0.030 a0.51 ± 0.101 b
120.35 ± 0.021 ab1.88 ± 0.335 b1.65 ± 0.29 a0.36 ± 0.046 b0.30 ± 0.025 b0.71 ± 0.248 a
160.38 ± 0.026 a1.91 ± 0.424 b1.47 ± 0.18 a0.31 ± 0.014 c0.33 ± 0.061 a0.82 ± 0.283 a
Statistical significance
A**n.s.**n.s.
B******
AxB*****n.s.
Table 3. Cation exchange properties as well as pH and EC in the soil after the summer savory harvest (mean for 2014–2016) (Note: For an explanation, see Table 1).
Table 3. Cation exchange properties as well as pH and EC in the soil after the summer savory harvest (mean for 2014–2016) (Note: For an explanation, see Table 1).
Plant
Development
Phases (A)
Nitrogen Dose
(g∙m−2) (B)
HASECTSCECCorgpHH2O
cmol(+)·kg−1(mS∙cm−1)(%)
Beginning of flowering03.16 ± 0.04 ab5.11 ± 0.04 b8.27 ± 0.02 c0.087 ± 0.0080.772 ± 0.004 d5.85
43.15 ± 0.04 b5.33 ± 0.04 a8.48 ± 0.04 a0.115 ± 0.0010.817 ± 0.002 c5.90
82.78 ± 0.03 c3.91 ± 0.02 f6.69 ± 0.03 f0.126 ± 0.0330.777 ± 0.002 d5.81
123.21 ± 0.02 ab5.16 ± 0.04 b8.37 ± 0.04 b0.121 ± 0.0290.842 ± 0.001 b5.97
163.22 ± 0.02 a3.12 ± 0.03 g6.34 ± 0.03 g0.145 ± 0.0340.893 ± 0.003 a5.89
Full flowering02.78 ± 0.05 c4.90 ± 0.03 c7.78 ± 0.03 d0.085 ± 0.0140.603 ± 0.003 h6.03
42.80 ± 0.02 c4.32 ± 0.02 e7.12 ± 0.03 e0.101 ± 0.0110.617 ± 0.003 g6.20
82.43 ± 0.04 d4.31 ± 0.02 e6.74 ± 0.03 f0.108 ± 0.0200.847 ± 0.002 b6.33
122.42 ± 0.03 d4.72 ± 0.03 d7.14 ± 0.04 e0.130 ± 0.0460.662 ± 0.002 f6.33
162.81 ± 0.02 c3.91 ± 0.02 f6.72 ± 0.04 f0.121 ± 0.0290.763 ± 0.002 e6.19
Main effects
Beginning of flowering
Full flowering
3.10 ± 0.17 a4.53 ± 0.87 a7.63 ± 0.93 a0.119 ± 0.0340.820 ± 0.045 a5.81–5.97
2.65 ± 0.18 b4.44 ± 0.35 b7.08 ± 0.37 b0.109 ± 0.0290.699 ± 0.094 b6.03–6.33
Nitrogen dose
02.97 ± 0.20 a5.01 ± 0.11 a7.98 ± 0.28 a0.086 ± 0.011 b0.689 ± 0.089 e5.85–6.03
42.98 ± 0.18 a4.83 ± 0.52 c7.80 ± 0.71 b0.108 ± 0.025 ab0.716 ± 0.107 d5.90–6.20
82.60 ± 0.17 c4.11 ± 0.20 d6.72 ± 0.39 d0.117 ± 0.028 a0.811 ± 0.046 b5.81–6.33
122.81 ± 0.41 b4.94 ± 0.22 b7.75 ± 0.61 c0.126 ± 0.032 a0.752 ± 0.096 c5.97–6.33
163.01 ± 0.21 a3.52 ± 0.41 e6.53 ± 0.20 e0.133 ± 0.036 a0.828 ± 0.069 a5.89–6.19
Statistical significance -
A***n.s*
B*****
AxB***n.s*
Table 4. Nutrient content in the soil after the summer savory harvest (in 2014–2016) (Note: For an explanation, see Table 1).
Table 4. Nutrient content in the soil after the summer savory harvest (in 2014–2016) (Note: For an explanation, see Table 1).
Plant Development Phases (A)Nitrogen
Dose
(g∙m−2)
(B)
N-NH4N-NO3P-PO4KCaMgS-SO4Cl
(mg∙dm−3)
Beginning of flowering010.75 ± 0.54 cd36.57 ± 0.62 ab22.64 ± 1.08 d50.65 ± 0.51331.83 ± 1.5335.85 ± 0.4419.02 ± 0.65 c46.96 ± 0.93 b
415.95 ± 0.38 bc27.65 ± 0.39 bc31.08 ± 0.89 bc65.75 ± 0.69330.50 ± 2.0950.57 ± 0.6222.12 ± 0.74 c26.46 ± 0.86 c
811.90 ± 0.98 cd54.07 ± 0.67 a31.57 ± 0.94 bc67.95 ± 1.03306.00 ± 1.4948.77 ± 0.3721.60 ± 0.62 c46.10 ± 0.43 b
1214.52 ± 0.75 bc24.50 ± 0.48 bc35.63 ± 0.84 ab65.45 ± 0.79317.00 ± 1.9842.30 ± 0.2636.80 ± 0.88 ab63.63 ± 0.56 a
1616.45 ± 0.40 b25.20 ± 0.51 bc30.13 ± 1.05 bc58.80 ± 0.80297.16 ± 0.9253.35 ± 0.8334.45 ± 0.64 ab42.24 ± 0.37 b
Full flowering0013.47 ± 0.94 bcd10.75 ± 0.54 c33.24 ± 0.52 ab63.82 ± 0.52365.66 ± 1.4847.00 ± 0.1923.50 ± 0.82 bc21.55 ± 0.33 d
448.75 ± 0.66 d14.35 ± 0.48 c34.77 ± 0.72 ab83.45 ± 072373.16 ± 1.8660.90 ± 0.1033.05 ± 0.53 ab31.87 ± 0.28 c
8815.72 ± 0.41 bc13.65 ± 0.36 c33.88 ± 0.35 ab70.90 ± 0.88431.66 ± 2.1259.87 ± 0.4948.90 ± 0.73 a64.35 ± 0.42 a
121217.85 ± 1.03 ab22.05 ± 0.45 bc37.34 ± 0.83 a83.25 ± 0.90335.16 ± 1.7055.00 ± 0.3432.95 ± 0.43 bc69.31 ± 1.18 a
161621.87 ± 0.76 a24.15 ± 0.50 bc29.67 ± 0.89 c70.87 ± 0.35367.16 ± 1.6260.62 ± 0.3931.87 ± 0.59 bc51.06 ± 0.80 b
Main effects
Beginning of flowering
Full flowering
Nitrogen dose
0
4
8
12
16
13.91 ± 0.61b33.60 ± 1.02 a30.21 ± 0.95 b61.72 ± 0.84 b316.50 ± 1.64 b46.17 ± 0.96 b26.80 ± 0.98 a45.08 ± 0.62
15.53 ± 1.13 a16.99 ± 0.66 b33.78 ± 0.89 a74.46 ± 0.97 a374.56 ± 1.97 a56.68 ± 1.16 a34.05 ± 1.02 a47.63 ± 0.73
12.11 ± 0.94 b23.66 ± 0.41 ab27.94 ± 1.06 c57.23 ± 0.78348.75 ± 1.4041.42 ± 0.67 c21.26 ± 0.35 b34.25 ± 0.78 d
12.33 ± 0.28 b21.00 ± 0.30 b32.92 ± 0.72 b74.60 ± 0.59351.83 ± 1.0355.73 ± 0.69 a27.58 ± 0.31 ab29.16 ± 0.38 d
13.81 ± 0.59 b33.86 ± 0.84 a32.73 ± 0.69 b69.42 ± 0.43368.83 ± 1.6654.32 ± 0.72 ab35.25 ± 0.73 a55.23 ± 0.20 b
16.18 ± 0.60 ab23.27 ± 0.45 ab36.49 ± 0.95 a74.35 ± 0.47326.08 ± 1.2548.65 ± 0.73 b34.87 ± 0.39 a66.47 ± 0.54 a
19.16 ± 0.81 a24.67 ± 0.21 ab29.90 ± 0.99 bc64.83 ± 0.34332.17 ± 0.9256.98 ± 0.81 a33.16 ± 0.55 a46.65 ± 0.59 c
Statistical significance
A*******n.s.
B***n.s.n.s.***
AxB***n.s.n.s.n.s.**

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skubij, N.; Dzida, K.; Jarosz, Z.; Pitura, K.; Jaroszuk-Sierocińska, M. Nutritional Value of Savory Herb (Satureja hortensis L.) and Plant Response to Variable Mineral Nutrition Conditions in Various Phases of Development. Plants 2020, 9, 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060706

AMA Style

Skubij N, Dzida K, Jarosz Z, Pitura K, Jaroszuk-Sierocińska M. Nutritional Value of Savory Herb (Satureja hortensis L.) and Plant Response to Variable Mineral Nutrition Conditions in Various Phases of Development. Plants. 2020; 9(6):706. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060706

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skubij, Natalia, Katarzyna Dzida, Zbigniew Jarosz, Karolina Pitura, and Monika Jaroszuk-Sierocińska. 2020. "Nutritional Value of Savory Herb (Satureja hortensis L.) and Plant Response to Variable Mineral Nutrition Conditions in Various Phases of Development" Plants 9, no. 6: 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060706

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop