Next Article in Journal
CP12 Is Involved in Protection against High Light Intensity by Suppressing the ROS Generation in Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942
Next Article in Special Issue
Single and Combined Salinity and Heat Stresses Impact Yield and Dead Pericarp Priming Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Variation in Pollination Deficits in an Insect-Pollinated Dioecious Crop
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydroscapes: A Useful Metric for Distinguishing Iso-/Anisohydric Behavior in Almond Cultivars
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Primary Root and Mesocotyl Elongation in Maize Seedlings: Two Organs with Antagonistic Growth below the Soil Surface

by
Mery Nair Sáenz Rodríguez
* and
Gladys Iliana Cassab
Departamento de Biología Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Av. Universidad 2001, Col. Chamilpa, Morelos, Cuernavaca 62210, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(7), 1274; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071274
Submission received: 10 April 2021 / Revised: 6 May 2021 / Accepted: 10 May 2021 / Published: 23 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Physiology and Environmental Stresses)

Abstract

:
Maize illustrates one of the most complex cases of embryogenesis in higher plants that results in the development of early embryo with distinctive organs such as the mesocotyl, seminal and primary roots, coleoptile, and plumule. After seed germination, the elongation of root and mesocotyl follows opposite directions in response to specific tropisms (positive and negative gravitropism and hydrotropism). Tropisms represent the differential growth of an organ directed toward several stimuli. Although the life cycle of roots and mesocotyl takes place in darkness, their growth and functions are controlled by different mechanisms. Roots ramify through the soil following the direction of the gravity vector, spreading their tips into new territories looking for water; when water availability is low, the root hydrotropic response is triggered toward the zone with higher moisture. Nonetheless, there is a high range of hydrotropic curvatures (angles) in maize. The processes that control root hydrotropism and mesocotyl elongation remain unclear; however, they are influenced by genetic and environmental cues to guide their growth for optimizing early seedling vigor. Roots and mesocotyls are crucial for the establishment, growth, and development of the plant since both help to forage water in the soil. Mesocotyl elongation is associated with an ancient agriculture practice known as deep planting. This tradition takes advantage of residual soil humidity and continues to be used in semiarid regions of Mexico and USA. Due to the genetic diversity of maize, some lines have developed long mesocotyls capable of deep planting while others are unable to do it. Hence, the genetic and phenetic interaction of maize lines with a robust hydrotropic response and higher mesocotyl elongation in response to water scarcity in time of global heating might be used for developing more resilient maize plants.

1. Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.) is a plant that belongs to Poaceae, the family of grasses. This is one of the most important crops in the world since represents a high percentage of total cereal production. The successful and continuous production of maize is key to food security [1,2,3]. With the current climate catastrophe scenario and the problems of food insecurity mostly due to soil erosion, drought, loss of arable land, and a population increase to approximately nine billion for 2050, it is projected that there must be an increase of 70% in global food production to mitigate hunger [4,5,6,7]. Thus, it is essential to develop different strategies to anticipate dire changes with the development of more resistant varieties of maize, capable of growing in diverse conditions and regions, where they can maintain high yields, as well as be nutritious [8,9,10,11]. Germination and early seedling growth are crucial for the establishment and seedling vigor of maize [12,13]. In these stages, the elongation of roots and the mesocotyl play a critical role beneath the soil surface that concludes with plant emergence. These agronomic characteristics have been more studied in rice, where it has been observed that higher yield often showed a direct association with seedling vigor and establishment. Accordingly, it has been used in rice breeding programs [13,14,15,16].
Since its inception, the approach to enhance crops has been to select superior genotypes from the identification of superior phenotypes. This selection has been used for years by phenotyping different traits of the aerial system (seed shape, size, or pigmentation), growth habits, and morphological markers (also “classical” or “visible”) of selection [8,10]. The traits of the organs that growth beneath soil surface have recently been analyzed as potential selection markers. In maize, the elongation of roots and the mesocotyl are traits of interest in the vegetative phase. These two organs with antagonist growth direction seem to determine the ability of seedlings to emerge under diverse conditions such as deep planting, drought, and cold or warmer soils [17,18,19,20].
Several regulatory mechanisms participate in the growth, development, and functions of roots and the mesocotyl; however, many of the processes that control the growth of these organs remain uncertain [21,22,23]. These are also influenced by genetic and environmental cues to guide their growth toward optimizing the establishment of the emerging young seedling, which will impact the full development of the mature plant [12,13].
Roots ramify through the soil following the direction of the gravity vector and spread their tips into new territories looking for water and nutrients; however, when water accessibility is decreased, roots develop a curvature toward the zone with higher moisture in the soil [24,25,26,27]. In maize hybrids, lines, and landraces, the root hydrotropic response trait varies widely from being robust (with root curvatures >40°) to weak (with root curvatures of <40°). This classification was established in accordance with observations in the test system of Eapen et al. (2017), which supports the great genetic diversity of maize [20,26].
Interestingly, the hybrids with a robust hydrotropic response were more resistant to drought and partial lateral irrigation compared to those with a weak hydrotropic response [26]. In turn, mesocotyl elongation is associated with an ancient agriculture practice known as deep planting, which is still utilized in the semiarid regions of Mexico and in the southwest of USA [28,29,30,31,32,33]. This practice takes advantage of residual soil humidity, thus enabling roots to absorb water for the developing seedling. However, not all maize lines have developed long mesocotyls capable of resisting deep planting [28,29,30,31,32]. Hence, the interaction between root hydrotropism and mesocotyl elongation in response to water deficit could be used to decipher the mechanisms that improved the resilience of one of the world’s most productive crop in a time of global heating.
Currently, it is urgent to invest in these traits in accelerated breeding programs for releasing new improved maize lines/cultivars/landraces with adequate yield under the forthcoming and irreversible changes such as higher temperature, unavailability of fresh water, pollution, and soil erosion. Farmers in developing countries, which will undoubtedly be the most affected by this crisis, will require access to elite germplasms with short breeding cycles, as well as resistance to drought, pathogens, and higher temperatures, especially since they practice low-input agriculture [34,35,36,37]. A detailed understanding of the genetic basis of traits such as mesocotyl elongation and the root hydrotropic response might help to accelerate genetic improvement through molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) for the development of more drought-tolerant maize cultivars [35,36,37,38,39].
This review is focused on two antagonist growth traits that occur beneath the soil surface during the early phase of seedling growth and development that we propose should be incorporated in future breeding studies. Maize has several adaptations in response to a diverse array of abiotic stress conditions [39,40,41]. Many genes regulate many traits in order to adjust to several environmental conditions via the induction of various morphological, biochemical, and physiological responses [42,43]. In maize, pleiotropy (when one gene influences two or more seemingly unrelated phenotypic traits) appears to be minimal. Accordingly, a robust root hydrotropic response together with a high elongation of the mesocotyl is decisive in determining the ability of seedlings to emerge under diverse conditions, such as various cultivation practices, water limitation, and cold or warmer soils that could invigorate early vigor [1,44]. The ability to predict these traits from genotypes would be an extraordinary tool for breeders [4].

2. Deep Planting

Deep planting is an agriculture practice commonly employed at high altitudes or in drier habitats. Its implementation is principally based on the seed size and the capacity of the germinating seedling to take advantage of a major area of exploration and residual soil humidity [45,46,47,48]. The physical rationale for deep planting recommendation usually assumes a tradeoff of increased water and nutrient availability with the increased energy requirement for emergence as a function of depth [48,49,50]. This agriculture practice generally requires a mechanical disturbance to incorporate seeds deep into the soil, thus reducing the risk of either desiccation or adverse high-temperature effects near the surface. Furthermore, seeds may evade extreme difficulties at the soil surface, such as the possibility to be washed away by wind or water currents, as well as by predation. Shallow plants on the surface may adequately develop; nevertheless, they may expose their root system, which can be detrimental for the fitness of plants [47,49,50,51,52]. Fluctuations in light and diurnal temperature seem to regulate dormancy to ensure that seeds germinate at an appropriate depth for a given species. There is evidence that landraces domesticated by southwestern Native Americans during prehistoric times were selected for their ability to germinate up to >20 cm depth in the soil [28,29,30,31,32,50,51]. The central and eastern United States landraces seeds sown deep in the soil had mesocotyls with a medium degree of extensibility, while the Hopi maize resisted very deep planting in drier soils and had mesocotyls with the maximum degree of extensibility [29].
Maize grown in the world is commonly planted ~5 cm deep with the exception of some varieties of arid regions in the southwestern USA and parts of western Mexico where Native Americans or Mexicans cultivated their local varieties of maize at depths of 20 cm or more in an attempt to trigger germination with the moisture usually found in deeper soil horizons. Deep planting takes advantage of the early cool spring in climates where mature plants frequently encounter drought [28,29,30,31,32]. Successful germination and seedling establishment depend upon the placement of seeds in a favorable soil microcosm by reducing water loss and by redistributing or concentrating resources around the seedling that, together with the energy stored in the endosperm, will be sufficient for supporting the growth of the mesocotyl in order to force its way up to the surface [50,53,54,55]. Indeed, seedling roots have the ability to explore a widely area when they are cultivated by deep planting [45,46,47,48,49,50].
Most commercial maize varieties are not adapted for deep planting, and young seedlings are frequently handicapped when their seeds are sown below their optimum depth [1,45,54]. Therefore, researchers have identified the recommended planting depth ranges in relation to the type of soil, texture, pH, and moisture conditions for different crop species. However, soils are never uniform or level; thus, consistently maintaining deep planting becomes a difficult task [45,55].
New types of nondestructive sensor technologies for the development of in-field seed depth measurement have been used for sustainable and cost-effective maize cultivation [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,50]. The comparison between transmission seeding and drill seeding methods showed that two to three more transmission seeding rates were recommended in each planting cycle [45,52]. However, the evidence is still limited in relation to the effects of planting depth. These studies were carried out on a smaller scale in the field or in controlled environments, as shown in Figure 1. An in vitro test system allows simultaneously measuring two traits (the elongation of the mesocotyl and the hydrotropic response of the root) under different stresses conditions (deep sowing and low humidity gradient) while keeping numerous abiotic factors under control such as light, temperature, and water availability [48]. It is necessary to evaluate the effect of depth on a large scale with studies that quantify the specific depth distribution after planting [28,29,52].
Deep planting also depends upon the topography of the soil and the economic considerations regarding the type of planting equipment and number of farmers available [28,29,47,55].
Deep planting is an alternative agricultural practice that has a major influence on plant germination and final crop yield; hence, the identification of varieties of maize tolerant toward deep planting and with a robust hydrotropic response should be of uttermost importance for its application in sustainable agriculture in times of imminent drought due to the climate crisis [28,29,55,56,57].

3. Maize (Zea mays L.)

3.1. Growth and Physiology

Maize kernels present a persistent endosperm and an embryo already developed with primary and seminal roots, mesocotyl, scutellum, coleorhiza, and coleoptile [3,8,22]. The embryo proper contains the root meristem (RAM) and the shoot meristem (SAM), relevant during the vegetative and reproductive phases for the development of the plant; these consist of a pool of stem cells that divide to give rise to more daughter cells that undergo cell division and differentiation throughout the entire life of the plant (Figure 2). The roots and mesocotyl continue to grow using a combination of cell division in the meristems and cell elongation in subapical regions named elongation zones, which are highly controlled by several mechanisms [16,58,59,60,61].
Tropisms are defined as the directional growth of different organs of plants due to the gravity vector (intrinsic on Earth) and to several environmental stimuli, such as light, water, obstacles, nutrients, oxygen, and temperature. The mesocotyl typically grows against the gravity vector (negative gravitropism) to push the coleoptile with the enclosed plumule (first leaf) in order to move through the soil and reach the light (positive phototropism), whereas roots grow downward into the soil following the direction of the gravity vector (positive gravitropism). Then, new and old roots spread their tips into new territories surveying for water and nutrients; when water is scarce, roots develop a hydrotropic response toward the zone with higher water accessibility [27,62,63,64,65].
The root system architecture of maize (Zea mays L.) has a complex organization. It contains embryonic and postembryonic root types, which are formed during different stages of development [60,66,67,68,69,70,71]. These are regulated by genetic programs, by interactions with the rhizosphere, and by adapting to changing environmental cues [59,72,73,74]. The primary root dominates the early seedling phases, which are the focus of this review.
Maize germination occurs in the dark when the seed contains at least 30% (v/w) moisture [61,74]. Initially, the primary root (PR) is formed at the basal pole from the embryonic radicle, and a variable number of seminal roots (SR) are laid down at the scutellar node. The ontogenesis and the role that SRs play in determining a good performance of the young seedling are still uncertain [60,74,75,76,77]. The PR elongates rapidly and, as it grows, forms many new lateral roots (LRs). The LRs initiate from a pericycle cell or sometimes from endodermal cells of the differentiation zone of the PR, and they increase the absorption surface of the root system, later becoming essential for water and nutrient uptake in young seedlings [71,78,79,80,81,82,83].
The PR may persist throughout the plant’s life, although it frequently ceases growing and branching, and it has relatively little functional importance after seedling establishment [65,66,67,68,84]. The PR commonly shows an orthogravitropic response (vertical to the gravity vector), while the SRs and LRs display diagravitropism (horizontal to gravity vector) or plagiogravitropism (oblique to the gravity vector). When the maize plant is in vegetative stage I, further lateral organs emerge from the primary organs in a stereotypical manner although they quickly realign to follow the gravity vector [62,63,64,65,71].
The presence of various functionally diverse cell types in the primary root determines its radial organization in a transverse orientation [76,78,79,80]. The root vascular system (xylem and phloem) is constituted by a central cylinder that contains the elements necessary for water and nutrient transport, where its outermost cell layer is a single anatomically distinct layer of thin-walled pericycle cells, followed by the cortex and the cuticle-less epidermis [71,83,84,85,86]. Longitudinally, maize roots can be divided into the root cap, followed by the RAM, the elongation zone, and the differentiation zone characterized by the presence of root hairs, which are formed on both embryonic and postembryonic roots and have crucial roles in water and nutrient uptake [80,82,83,84,85,86,87]. The postembryonic root system is composed of shoot-borne roots that are formed at consecutive shoot nodes and LRs that are initiated in the pericycle of all roots. Nodal maize roots can be subdivided into crown and brace roots according to whether they initiated from underground or aboveground nodes, respectively. They are crucial for water absorption and anchorage during the further development stages of the maize plant [69,71].
The mesocotyl can be seen as a bridge that connects the basal part of the seedling with the coleoptilar node and shoot, and both the mesocotyl and coleoptile push the shoot tip above the soil surface during seed germination [88,89]. In maize, this structure was defined by a group of researchers as the first portion of the shoot, while others considered it as a modified root with a cuticularized epidermis since its physiology is quite similar to that of roots [28,29,30,31,32,90]. The morphology and the anatomy of the maize mesocotyl are described as having several zones. In transversal slides, observed from outside to inside, these are the epidermis, cortex, and central vascular stele; in longitudinal slides, the first zone observed is next to the coleoptilar node (approximately 1.0 mm), including meristematic cells, the second zone (3.0 mm below) contains rapidly growing cells, and the third zone (5.0 mm below) near to the escutellar node presents mature cells (Figure 3) [61]. The mesocotyl also uniquely responds to environmental cues and to stress conditions, whereby some maize lines develop fine roots capable of extensive growth [91]. The dominant factor implicated in mesocotyl elongation is somatic polyploidy referred to as endopolyploidization [89,92]. Polyploidy is defined as an increase in genome DNA content. Somatic polyploidy seems to be a mechanism that produces large cells. This is utilized in some developmental contexts in which fewer and larger cells have functional advantages over a similar bulk of an increased number of smaller cells. Polyploidy likewise increases gene expression and/or metabolism [89,93]. It remains to be determined whether the cells of the mesocotyl become larger after germination, and whether this phenotype may ultimately regulate its elongation and function.
The effects of anatomical and architectural changes in these two organs (root and mesocotyl) in response to various types of stress are also of interest for crop improvement.

3.2. Regulatory Mechanisms

The transition from the skotomorphogenic or etiolation period to the photomorphogenic period is primarily regulated by the lengthening of the roots and the mesocotyl; nevertheless, different regulatory mechanisms control their growth and development. Seedling development outlines the future plant body with preformed embryonic organs, including the mesocotyl and the roots. The two main factors that regulate seedling development are (a) light (phototropism), which has been widely studied, and (b) the intervention of growth regulators that influence various physiological process at low concentrations (hormones such as auxin, gibberellin, and ethylene) [28,29,30,31,32]. Both factors can act alone and be integrated into several processes during the establishment of maize seedlings (bounded by the red dotted lines; refer to Figure 4). During this time, the primary root and mesocotyl simultaneously elongate in dark conditions, using the seed energy and with minor water consumption compared to that in other phenological cycle phases such as flowering, as described below (Figure 4) [94,95,96].

3.2.1. Light

The patterns of development under light are different from those in the dark in relation to gene expression, cellular and subcellular differentiation, and organ morphology [22,52,94]. The light penetrates several cm through the soil, creating gradients of light quality and quantity [52,94,95,96,97,98,99]. Therefore, it is also necessary to evaluate the depth of sowing according to the practice of the crop. Under current cultivation practices, maize seeds are sown within a few centimeters (~5 cm) of the soil surface, with the exception of some cultivars that have the ability for germinate when sown at 20 cm depth, utilized in deep planting [96,97,98,99,100].
In darkness, the energy required for the elongation of the roots and mesocotyl is supplied by the endosperm reserves [58,59]. The elongation of these structures is primarily guided by two main stimuli, the gravity vector (gravitropism) and obstacles (thigmotropism), according to the postulate made by Knight in 1806, who indicated that a plant’s perception of gravity might modulate its ability to direct shoots to grow upward and guide roots downward, and who introduced the concept of tropism [66]. Years later, Darwin (1880) made numerous physiological contributions by documenting a wide array of tropic responses and identifying regions specialized for the perception of the different stimuli [63,95,96].
Nearing the soil surface, the seedling perceives both light and the dark–light transition, which affects organ architecture and growth rate during the first stages of seedling establishment. In particular, a young seedling buried under the soil surface showed rapid extension growth of hypogean organs and a reduction in or even inhibition of mesocotyl elongation [101,102]. After germination, the shoot apex sheathed by the coleoptile is pushed through the soil by the elongating mesocotyl. The rapid upward movement of the shoot apex is facilitated by reducing root formation and leaf expansion, while expending the last amount of energy derived from the seed reserves [103]. As the emerging maize seedling perceives light, there is a decrease in mesocotyl elongation, an induction of root growth, and an expansion of leaves, along with numerous profound changes that allow the initiation of the photoautotrophic phase of the plant [22,94,95,96,97,98].
In maize seedlings, the processes associated with the transition from dark to light conditions have barely been studied in comparison with those of Arabidopsis thaliana (Dicotyledoneae model). In Arabidopsis, these have been ascribed to global transcriptional changes mediated by relocalization, phosphorylation, and degradation of light response regulators [22]. It is likely that many of these early signaling events are similar in grasses; however, they need to be determined fully in monocots [71,104].
Photosynthesis requires active radiation between 400 and 700 nm (white light, W), and the maximum absorption spectra of plant pigments are as follows: chlorophylls (430–455 nm) and carotenoids (400–500 nm). Much of the green and most of the far-red spectra are either transmitted through green tissues or reflected by the plant and, thus, have the potential to serve as cues in sensing the foliar environment [71,98]. However, higher plants have several photoreceptors, such as phytochromes, cryptochromes, phototropins, and UV-B photoreceptors, which allow the developing seedling to not only monitor the quality and flux of incident light, but also control its growth and further development [22,105]. Plants typically perceive wavelength ranges such as UV-B (280–320 nm), UV-A (320–380 nm), blue (380–495 nm), green (495–570 nm), yellow/orange (570–620 nm), red (620–690 nm), and far-red (690–800 nm) [96,106]. Light may be involved in many more developmental processes during the entire life of the plant, which are still unknown in relation to its broad spectrum of perception, thus necessitating further studies.
Seedling growth just after germination is profoundly influenced by light in two important ways: (1) by phototropism, which has been extensively reviewed and is not discussed in this review, and (2) by light inhibition of organs, which is equally important in saving energy during growth [71,107]. As mentioned earlier, the elongation of the roots and mesocotyl is stimulated in the dark before emergence, indicating that both organs first display a negative phototropic response. However, growth of both the roots and the mesocotyl is slowed down by light, perhaps by the presence of chlorophyll in the early stages of seedling development [31,106].
Root growth and mesocotyl elongation have shown inhibitory responses to red light, far-red light, UV light, and blue light dependent on the intensity and time of exposure [96,105,106,107,108,109,110,111]. Blue light induces the coleoptile to supply to the mesocotyl a substance that slows its rate of elongation. This inference was based upon (1) the presence of a factor in the coleoptile exposed to blue light, (2) the presence of pigments in the coleoptile that absorbed blue light, and (3) the apparent absence of such pigments in the mesocotyl [106,110,111,112]. Cell-wall extensibility also inhibits mesocotyl elongation in the presence of light [112].
The first photomorphogenic mutant of maize elm1 (elongated mesocotyl 1) was identified and characterized in a sand bench screen as a pale, green plant with an elongated mesocotyl. The elm1 encodes an enzyme with phytochromobilin synthase activity, which disrupts the synthesis of the chromophore of phytochrome and makes it very deficient in phytochrome responses to both red and far-red irradiation. In this mutant, the phototropic response of mesocotyl elongation has been studied extensively; nonetheless, relatively few investigations have focused on root phototropism during the pre-emergence phase [107,108,109,110,111,112]. In maize, little is known about the molecular components of the light signal transduction pathways. However, the critical role of light is recognized in the regulation of the root and mesocotyl elongation traits, indicating that the manipulation of light responses in these organs may prove fruitful in enhancing seedling vigor and should be examined further [98,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111].
Additionally, polyamine oxidase (PAO) increases its activity after light exposure in maize mesocotyl, which results in the hardening of the cell wall and inhibition of mesocotyl elongation [95,112].

3.2.2. Hormones

Plant hormones play a crucial role in controlling the way in which plants grow and develop. These regulate the speed and timing of growth of the individual organs and cells and integrate them to generate the basic body plan that we recognize as a plant (Figure 5) [95,96,97,113].
Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is the main auxin in plants. Auxin stimulates elongation of the roots and mesocotyl and is also implicated in the control of the tropic responses to gravity and light [23,114,115]. It has been suggested that, during mesocotyl elongation, light regulates auxin supply from the coleoptile. Auxin induces mesocotyl growth and suppresses it via inhibition of its transport [95,116,117]. The mechanisms of regulation of gene expression, transport, and function of auxins in the mesocotyl are unclear [117,118]. However, Dong et al. (2013) described the ZmLA1 gene that encodes a LAZY1 ortholog in rice and Arabidopsis, which plays an important role in the regulation of polar auxin transport and auxin signaling in maize, influenced by light. Thus, mesocotyl elongation in la1 mutants was accelerated in dark but not in light conditions [119,120].
Abscisic acid (ABA) promotes the elongation of roots and the mesocotyl by increasing cell division activity of the meristem [95,121]. ABA also regulates shoot growth, which suggests that the capacity for inhibiting mesocotyl expansion increases as cells are displaced away from the meristematic regions of both roots and shoots [122,123]. Previous work has indicated that accumulation of ABA acts differentially to maintain elongation of the primary root and inhibit elongation of the mesocotyl of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings at low water potentials [122,123,124].
Gibberellins (GA) are essential regulators of many aspects of plant development including organ elongation [95,125]. This hormone increases the amount of osmotic solutes, such as sugars in shoots of various plants, thereby stimulating elongation growth of shoots and cell-wall-bound invertase (INCW) activity by suppressing INCW activity via downregulation of its gene expression in both organs. This is enhanced in the mesocotyl. This enzyme is ionically bound to the cell wall and catalyzes the hydrolysis of sucrose to glucose and fructose, and it is involved in the phloem unloading process of sucrose in sink tissues with sugar accumulation. Cellular osmotic properties are an important factor regulating the rate of cell expansion. It is generally believed that the amount of osmotic solutes in cells determines the force of water uptake, thereby regulating the rate of cell growth [126]. However, Soga et al. (2021) in their studies showed the decrease in sugar content in coleoptiles and mesocotyls and inhibited the growth of both organs when etiolated maize seedlings were subjected to light irradiation. Thus, the phenomena induced by light were opposite to those induced by gibberellins [127,128,129]. Hoson (1999) proposed that light acts as a gravity-substituting factor in growth regulation, because many mechanisms for growth regulation by light and gravity are common. The GA response of maize mesocotyl is cultivar-dependent. However, all maize seedlings from different inbred lines are insensitive to GA under shallow growth conditions [130,131,132].
Ethylene (E) is a hormone produced from methionine, which inhibits the elongation of maize roots and the mesocotyl in darkness [133,134,135]. This effect on the mesocotyl is rescued by adding carbon dioxide (CO2) [134]. Ethylene production is highly regulated by several enzymes encoded by multigene families, and it is an essential mediator of plant responses to environmental stimuli [135]. In maize roots, E upregulates the expression of cell-wall-associated proteins including xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase (ZmXET), which swells and assembles plant cell walls [136,137,138]. Furthermore, ethylene stimulates elongation of the mesocotyl under red light conditions and induces lateral expansion [95,139].
Brassinosteroids (BR) are part of a family of plant-specific endogenous and polyhydroxylated steroid hormones [140,141,142,143]. BRs play a crucial role in many physiological processes throughout the lifespan of the plant, from germination to seed production, and are involved in mediating plant responses to stress [142,143,144]. The biosynthesis and signaling pathways in maize have not been well established, but their defects seriously affect plant physiology during photomorphogenesis in the dark [143,144,145]. BR and GA promote vigor and growth of seedlings [131].
Jasmonates (JA) are oxidized lipids, collectively known as oxylipins [146]. These inhibit many plant processes such as seed germination and seedling growth. The molecular mechanism of this process underlying plant growth remains to be elucidated in mesocotyl and root elongation [147]. In Arabidopsis, the antagonist activity of JA against the activities of IAA and GA, is related to the action of different signaling elements such as auxin-signaling AXR1 (AUXIN RESISTANT 1), whereby axr1 mutants displayed a variety of morphological defects consistent with a reduction in auxin sensitivity, and GA-signaling protein DELLA, which acts as a repressor of GA activity [147,148,149]. On the other hand, the double-mutant for two oxo-phytodienoate reductase genes OPR7 and OPR8 (opr7opr814) in maize had a dramatically low content of JA, E, ABA, and cytokinin (KIT) and showed developmental defects such as an unusual ear [147,148,149].
Strigolactones (SLs) are butenolide compounds that are involved in various developmental processes and environmental responses, including root system architecture formation, secondary growth of the cambium, inhibition of mesocotyl elongation by controlling cell division in the dark, and drought tolerance in rice (Oriza sativa L.) [95,150,151].
Active KIT consist of an adenine (Ade) moiety with an N6-substituted isoprene chain, isoprene derivative, or an aromatic ring [95,151]. Cytokinins inhibit LR formation, influence the root architecture, and seem to antagonize auxin action in the root meristem by promoting cell differentiation along the primary root axis [152].
The regulatory mechanisms described above show the complex interplay between light and hormone signaling pathways; thus, a thorough characterization of these networks in maize will most probably provide many potential targets for agronomic improvement [95,109,113].

3.3. Function

Root and mesocotyl elongation play important roles in different processes that end up with the emergence of the seedling, which might be considered as an index of seedling vigor. Both are sensitive organs that perceive and assess soil conditions, as well as chemical and biological factors in their environment for promoting seedling fitness. Changes in these organs have occurred as a consequence of domestication, breeding, and climate change, leading to contrasting spatial arrangements [61,153]. The particular functions of the roots and mesocotyl must integrate the mechanisms that regulate and coordinate at some level the local and systemic responses during seedling establishment. The functions of the maize root system prior to the emergence period have been poorly studied. These roots are critical for anchoring the plant in the soil and for efficient uptake of water and mineral nutrients, thus playing a key role in vigor [32,71,124]. Moreover, they contribute to widening the volume of soil explored by increasing the extension capacity of the root system and compensating for root death [46,71,132].
The architecture of root systems describes the spatial distribution of all type of roots, which are limited by the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the soil [45,50,71]. The root system has been the target of modern breeding programs to develop varieties tolerant toward drought or nutrient deficiencies. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to analyze the root system of many samples in field conditions without disrupting them [32,53,92].
The mesocotyl’s primarily function is to assure the establishment of the root system at a suitable distance below the soil surface, and it is also crucial for the emergence of the coleptile, which is the protective sheath enclosing the young leaves above ground. Additionally, it supports shoot-borne crown roots through its cortical aerenchyma. Thus, mesocotyl elongation and root maize development are strongly interrelated [30,31,154].
The mesocotyl is the first internode of the maize plant and is the organ that compensates for deep planting of the kernel. The mesocotyl continues to grow until the coleoptile emerges, after which it stops growing [31,55,89]. A healthy mesocotyl is extremely important because it transports nutrients from the endosperm of the grain to the developing seedling. The plant primarily depends on the endosperm content for its nutrients and energy until the nodal roots are developed [56]. Hence, seedlings may be stunted or even die if their nodal roots do not develop before the kernel reserves are exhausted. Similarly, if the primary leaf emerges underground, it is likely that the seedling perishes [56,155,156,157].
The results of Cheeseman et al. (1983) indicated that the mesocotyl of maize seedlings is crucial in the control of sodium transport to the leaves, while maize roots showed marked selectivity for potassium over sodium during the vegetative phase of development [90,119,158]. Thus, an effective exclusion of cations (Na+) by the maize mesocotyl can be utilized as a potential strategy for salt tolerance of the shoot.

4. The Root Hydrotropic Response and Mesocotyl Elongation for the Genetic Improvement of Crops

The strong effects of climate change or, as recently described, climate catastrophe on the yield of different crops in the last few years have aroused common interests among plant scientists and breeders for examining underground traits that could be used in the genetic selection of more resilient plants exposed to higher temperatures and longer droughts [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,159]. Despite the difficulty in simultaneously examining the roots and mesocotyl under realistic conditions, genomic analyses of these organs in maize have increased substantially, resulting in the dissection of many features of agricultural importance [19,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. The availability of the B73 maize reference genome, the various accessions that have been extensively collected in recent years for quantitative purposes, and the complexity of the genome, which has demonstrated the presence of several genotypes and whose various characteristics provide abundant genetic material, make maize a noteworthy study model [160].
Recent advances in DNA sequencing technology, including major access to next-generation sequencing (NGS), have enabled powerful tools to be used for understanding the genetic basis of these variations [9,160,161,162]. Thus, we can apply various methodologies that include breeding and selection in the field combined with QTL mapping, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), comparative transcriptomes, and precise high-throughput phenotyping of diverse complex traits for selecting superior varieties of maize [17,33,34,35]. However, identifying the causal gene or variant is still challenging [39,40,41,42].

4.1. Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping (QTL)

QTL analysis using different molecular techniques has permitted the identification of genes in chromosome regions and their association with traits at diverse stages of development, under diverse biotic and abiotic conditions. This has also enabled establishing the number of individuals and generations required for improvement (introgression or segregation of characters into the population). The main disadvantage of QTL mapping is the great influence of environmental factors [32,33,34,35]. However, QTL analyses of these two traits have shown relatively small effects or failed in their detection under some genetic backgrounds, while their localization has not been consistent across studies, which is necessary for any future map-based cloning and marker-associated selection [160,161,162,163]. Zhang et al. (2012) and Pace et al. (2015) demonstrated the main role of mesocotyl elongation in deep seedling tolerance and the beneficial influence of a larger root system for the maize plant. These results were dependent of the target environment and their test maize population, where the traits seem to be controlled by several loci, and they also revealed considerable overlapping among the QTLs for different traits of the root system [138,139]. Root elongation showed a correlation with other traits such as branching of the root system (e.g., number and weight of seminal roots), while mesocotyl elongation showed a correlation with coleoptile elongation, as well as early vigor (Table 1) [103,162,163,164].

4.2. Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)

In recent years, GWAS have become a useful adjunct to classical genetic mapping of quantitative traits in plants (Huang et al., 2013). This powerful statistical approach to identify the genetic factors underlying intraspecific phenotypic variations has allowed us to acquire variation data on a large number of accessions characterized by various traits. The GWAS approach has been successfully applied for important aerial and underground characteristics of important crops [14,163,164,165,166]. In maize, GWAS have identified markers associated with the development of root traits under various conditions, whereas there are no GWAS reports of mesocotyl elongation; however, there have been some studies in other grasses such as rice [161,162,163,164,165,167,168,169,170,171]. Analysis and interpretation of the cause–effect relationship among different traits will be useful for understanding how maize avoids drought under diverse enviroments [32,33,34,35,166,172,173,174].

4.3. RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq)

RNA-seq is an NGS assay, whose low cost, high throughput, and high sensitivity have conveniently aided in carrying out transcriptome analyses of maize [175]. These assays have allowed obtaining complete transcripts from the RNA of maize root tissue or from individual cells, as well as the mesocotyl of other grasses. The information derived from RNA-seq analysis might aid in the identification of the developmental processes that occur throughout the life cycle of a plant [175,176,177]. Consequently, the knowledge about gene expression networks modulating these two traits and their abiotic stress adaptation could be used for genetic prediction, and this might be exploited not only for direct selection in breeding programs but also for identifying genotypes of interest, which may have rare alleles affecting quantitative traits of interest that are difficult to measure [164,177,178,179].
At present, the SNPs related to the traits and the candidate genes through which the identified genetic variants exert their effects on the traits remain largely unknown. Therefore, it is important for researchers to integrate multi-omics studies into linkage and association mapping to close the knowledge gap [32]. An understanding of the molecular regulatory mechanisms of traits in response to stress conditions will be useful for maize breeding [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,155,156,157,158,159]

5. Conclusions

  • Deep planting should be a more common practice for developing sustainable agriculture in arid and semiarid areas of the Earth in the current climate crisis due to human activity.
  • New genetic and molecular tools should be used to examine the role of hormones and their interplay in controlling root hydrotropism and mesocotyl elongation. This characterization in maize will provide many potential targets for agronomic improvement.
  • The genetic diversity of native maize landraces should be exploited for the selection of those which show a robust hydrotropic response and higher elongation rate of the mesocotyl for deep planting in poor areas without high-input agriculture and which are prone to longer droughts and higher temperatures.
  • Maize improvement by genetic selection should use the information derived from genomic and transcriptomic analyses of root hydrotropism and mesocotyl elongation traits during seedling establishment in relation to early vigor.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.N.S.R. and G.I.C.; methodology, M.N.S.R. and G.I.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N.S.R.; writing—review and editing, G.I.C. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), México: PN 247732, and by a grant from the Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Académico: PAPIIT-UNAM # IN 214119. M.N.S.R. is supported by a fellowship from Becas Rodolfo Llinás para la promoción de la formación avanzada y el espíritu científico en Bogotá, Fundación Ceiba; SGR Colciencias DNP: BPIN 2013000100210.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We first acknowledge Jorge Nieto-Sotelo for introducing us to the fascinating world of maize deep planting. We would also like to express our enormous gratitude to M. en T. I. Juan Manuel Hurtado, Ing. Roberto Rodríguez-Bahena, and B. A. Dip. Lib. A. L. A. Shirley Ainsworth for excellent computer and bibliography assistance. We also thank María Eugenia Campos for her exceptional support as our lab manager and close collaborator.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hallauer, A.R.; Carena, M.J. Maize Breeding. In Handbook of Plant Breeding: Cereals; Carena, M.J., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 3–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ribault, J.M.; Bétran, J.; Monneveux, P.; Setter, T. Drought tolerance in maize. In Handbook of Maize: Its Biology; Bennetzen, J.L., Hake, S.C., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 311–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wallace, J.G.; Larsson, S.J.; Buckler, E.S. Entering the second century of maize quantitative genetics. J. Hered. 2014, 112, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Brooks, S.; Thompson, J.; Odame, H.; KIbarara, B.; Nderitu, S.; Karin, F.; Millstone, E. Enviromental Change and Maize Innovation in Kenya: Exploring Pathways in and Out of Maize; STEPS Working Paper 36; STEPS Centre: Brighton, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  5. Grassini, P.; van Bussel, L.G.J.; van Wart, J.; Wolf, J.; Claessens, L.; Yanga, H.; Boogaard, H.; de Groot, H.; van Ittersum, M.K.; Cassman, K.G. How good is good enough? Data requirements for reliable crop yield simulations and yield-gap analysis. Field Crops Res. 2015, 177, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hamidov, A.; Helming, K.; Bellocchi, G.; Bojar, W.; Dalgaard, T.; Ghaley, B.B.; Hoffmann, C.; Holman, I.; Holzkämper, A.; Krzeminska, D.; et al. Impacts of climate change adaptation options on soil functions: A review of European case-studies. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 2378–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kc, K.; Dias, G.M.; Veeramani, A.; Swanton, C.L.; Fraser, D.; Steinke, D.; Lee, E.; Wittman, H.; Farber, J.M.; Dunfield, K.; et al. When too much isn’t enough: Does current food production meet global nutritional needs? PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Hallauer, A.R.; Miranda, J.B. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding, 2nd ed.; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 2010; p. 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, J.; Yuan, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Guo, X.; Wu, F.; Wang, Q.; Rong, T.; Pan, G.; Cao, M.; et al. Identification of candidate genes for drought tolerance by whole-genome resequencing in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Martínez, M.C.; Helguera, M.; Carrera, A. Marcadores moleculares. Herramientas básicas. In Biotecnología y Mejoramiento Vegetal II; Levitus, G., Echenique, V., Rubistein, C., Hopp, E., Mroginski, L., Eds.; INTA: Mar del Plata, Argentina, 2010; Volume 5, pp. 70–85. [Google Scholar]
  11. Raza, A.; Razzaq, A.; Mehmood, S.S.; Zou, X.; Zhang, X.; Lv, Y.; Xu, J. Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review. Plants 2019, 8, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. McKell, C.M. Seedling vigor and seedling establishment. In The Biology and Utilization of Grasses; Younger, V., McKell, C.M., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1972; pp. 74–89. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cui, K.H.; Peng, S.B.; Xing, Y.Z.; Xu, C.G.; Yu, S.B.; Zhang, Q. Molecular dissection of seedling-vigor and associated physiological traits in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105, 745–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cheng, X.; Cheng, J.; Huang, X.; Lai, Y.; Wang, L.; Du, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H. Dynamic quantitative trait loci analysis of seed reserve utilization during three germination stages in rice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Xie, L.; Tan, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, R.; Feng, L.; Xing, Y.; Qi, X. Identification and fine mapping of quantitative trait loci for seed vigor in germination and seedling establishment in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 56, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhan, J.; Lu, X.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Q.; Ye, G. Mesocotyl elongation, an essential trait fot dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.): A review of physiological and genetic basis. Planta 2019, 251, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hund, A.; Franhboud, Y.; Soldati, A.; Frascaroli, E.; Salvi, S.; Stamp, P. QTL controlling root and shoot trait of maize seedlings under cold stress. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109, 618–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yamamoto, K.; Momonoki, Y.S. Tissue localization of maize acetylcholinesterase associated with heat tolerance in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Liu, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Li, C.; Zeng, X.; Xie, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Hu, S.; Wang, J.; et al. Quantitative trait locus analysis for deep-sowing germination ability in the maize IBM Syn10 DH population. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Eapen, D.; Martínez, J.J.; Cassab, G.I. Assays for root hydrotropism and response to water stress. In Plant Gravitropism: Methods and Protocols; Blancaflor, E.B., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bennetzen, J.L.; Hake, E.S.A. Maize genome structure and function. In Handbook of Maize: Genetics and Genomics; Springer Science: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 179–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kynast, R.G. Handbook of Maize: Its Biology, Ann. Bot, 7th ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; p. 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kutschera, U.; Wang, Z.Y. Growth-limiting proteins in maize coleoptiles and the auxin-brassinosteroid hypothesis of mesocotyl elongation. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sharp, R.E.; Silk, W.K.; Hsiao, T.C. Mint: Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials. I. Spatial distribution of expansive growth. Plant Physiol. 1988, 87, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Takahashi, H.; Scott, T.K. Hydrotropism and its interaction with gravitropism in maize roots. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Eapen, D.; Martínez, J.J.; Hernández, O.; Flores, L.; Nieto-Sotelo, J.; Cassab, G.I. Synergy between root hydrotropic response and root biomass in maize (Zea mays L.) enhances drought avoidance. Plant Sci. 2017, 265, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Su, S.H.; Gibbs, N.M.; Jancewicz, A.L.; Masson, P.H. Molecular mechanisms of root gravitropism. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 964–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Collins, G.N. Drought-resisting adaptation in maize. J. Agric. Res. 1914, 1, 293–302. illus. [Google Scholar]
  29. Collins, G.N. Pueblo Indian Maize Breeding (Varieties specially adapted to arid regions developed by Hopis and Navajos their work not sufficiently appreciated. Probably much yet to be learned from them). J. Hered. 1914, 5, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kempton, J. Inheritance of Mesocotyl Length in Hibrids of Brachytic Maize. Am. Midl. Nat. AMNAAF 1923, 57, 374–377. [Google Scholar]
  31. Flint, L.H. Light and the elongation of the mesocotyl in corn. Plant Physiol. 1944, 19, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Alibu, S.; Saito, Y.; Shiwachi, H.; Irie, K. Genotypic variation in coleoptile or mesocotyl lengths of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) and seedling emergence in deep sowing. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 47, 6239–6248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Liu, Z.; Gao, K.; Shan, S.; Gu, R.; Wang, Z.; Craft, E.J.; Mi, G.; Yuan, L.; Chen, F. Comparative Analysis of Root Traits and the Associated QTLs for Maize Seedlings Grown in Paper Roll, Hydroponics and Vermiculite Culture System. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Mullen, J.L.; Wolverton, C.; Ishikawa, H.; Hangarter, R.P.; Evans, M.L. Spatial separation of light perception and growth response in maize root phototropism. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 1191–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Prasanna, B.M.; Pixley, K.; Warburton, M.L.; Xie, C.X. Molecular marker-assisted breeding options for maize improvement in Asia. Mol. Breed. 2010, 26, 339–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Atlin, G.N.; Cairns, J.E.; Das, B. Rapid breeding and varietal replacement are critical to adaptation of cropping systems in the developing world to climate change. Glob. Food Secur. 2017, 12, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Caligari, P. Plant Breeding and crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bray, A.L.; Topp, C.N. The Quantitative Genetic Control of Root Architecture in Maize. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 1919–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, P.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, S.; Zhu, P.; Pan, T.; Xu, Y.; Wang, J.; Hao, D.; Fang, H.; Xu, C.; et al. QTL-By-Environment Interaction in the Response of Maize Root and Shoot Traits to Different Water Regimes. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Paez-Garcia, A.; Motes, C.M.; Scheible, W.R.; Chen, R.; Blancaflor, E.B.; Monteros, M.J. Root traits and phenotyping strategies for plant improvement. Plants 2015, 4, 334–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Salungyu, J.; Kengkanna, J.; Lavoy, W.; Saengwilai, P. Exploring natural variation of root architectural traits in seedlings of maize hybrid and inbred lines from Thailand. Budapest, Hungary. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2018, 16, 1119–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tanksley, S.D.; Nelson, J.C. Advanced backcroos QTL analysis: A method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1996, 92, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fahad, S.; Bajwa, A.A.; Nazir, U.; Anjum, S.A.; Farooq, A.; Zohaib, A.; Sadia, S.; Nasim, W.; Adkins, S.; Saud, S.; et al. Crop Production under Drought and Heat Stress: Plant Responses and Management Options. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Tulpule, S. A Study of pleotropic genes in maize. Am. J. Bot. 1954, 41, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hardegree, S.P.; Jones, T.A.; Roundy, B.A.; Shaw, N.L.; Monaco, T.A. Assessment of range planting as a conservation practice. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 2016, 69, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Koevoets, I.T.; Venema, J.H.; Elzenga, J.T.; Testerink, C. Roots Withstanding their Environment: Exploiting Root System Architecture Responses to Abiotic Stress to Improve Crop Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Thorup-Kristensen, K.; Halberg, N.; Nicolaisen, M.; Olsen, J.E.; Crew, T.E.; Hinsinger, P.; Kirkegaard, J.; Pierret, A.; Dresboll, D.B. Deeper for agricultural resources, the value of deep rooting. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 4, 406–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Nieto-Sotelo, J.; Martinez, D.A.; Cruz, C.A.; Vázquez, L. Práctcas agrícolas tradicionales y la conservación de maíces nativos en México. In Sistemas Agroalimentarios Localizados Y Prácticas Agrícolas Tradicionales. Hacia Una Propuesta De Política Pública Para El Desarrollo Rural; Tolentino, J.M., Larroa, R.M., Renard, M.-C., Del Valle, M.-C., Eds.; Red SIAL-México: Ciudad de México, Mexico, 2018; pp. 176–200. ISBN 978-607-8535-37-8. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gregory, P.J.; Bengough, A.G.; Grinev, D.; Schmidt, S.; Thomas, W.T.B.; Wojciechowski, T.; Young, I.M. Root phenomics of crops: Opportunities and challenges. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009, 36, 922–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vanhees, D.J.; Loades, K.W.; Bengough, A.G.; Mooney, S.J.; Lynch, J. Root anatomical traits contribute to deeper rooting of maize uner compacted field conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 14, 4243–4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bentsink, L.; Koornneef, M. Seed dormancy and germination. Arab. Book 2008, 6, e0119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Markelz, N.H.; Costich, D.E.; Brutnell, T.P. Photomorphogenic responses in maize seedling development. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 1578–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Mapoka, K.O.M.; Birrellz, S.J.; Tekekeste, M. A comprehensive survey of nondestructive sensing technologies for the detection of corn seed in a closed trench and measuring planting depth to augment the conventional method. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 158, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Collander, R. Selective absorption of cations by higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1941, 16, 691–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Gilbert, S.F. Developmental Biology, 6th ed.; Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates, Germination. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/books/NBK9979/ (accessed on 20 October 2019).
  56. du Plessis, J. Maize Production; Department of Agriculture, Directorate Agricultural Information Services Private Bag X144: Pretoria, South Africa, 2003; p. 38. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhao, G.; Wang, J.H. Effect of auxin on mesocotyl elongation of dark-grown maize under different seeding depths. Russian J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 57, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Titon, V.R. The influence of individual embryonic tissues on the morphology and development of Zea Mays (Poaceae) germlings. Am. J. Bot. 1981, 68, 980–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Van Lammeren, A.A.M. Embryogenesis in Zea mays L.: A structural approach to maize caryopsis development in vivo and in vitro. In Plant Cytol and Morphol; Agricultural University Wageningen: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1987; p. 175. [Google Scholar]
  60. Hochholdinger, F.; Yu, P.; Marcon, C. Genetic control of root system development in maize. Trends Plant Sci 2018, 23, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Niu, L.; Hao, R.; Wu, X.; Wang, W. Maize mesocotyl: Role in response to stress and deep-sowing tolerance. Plant Breed. 2020, 139, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cassab, G.I.; Sánchez, Y. Diferenciación y Crecimiento Diferencial: La Capacidad Motriz de las Plantas. In Fisiología Vegetal; Sequeo, F.A., Cardemil, L., Eds.; Ediciones Universidad de La Serena: La Serena, Chile, 2006; Volume 8, pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  63. Plant Tropisms; Gilroy, S.; Masson, P.H. (Eds.) Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA; Oxford, UK; Victoria, Australia, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Blancaflor, E.B. Plant Gravitropism: Methods and Protocols; Springer Science: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Suzuki, H.; Yokawa, K.; Nakano, S.; Yoshida, Y.; Fabrissin, I.; Okamoto, T.; Baluska, F.; Koshiba, T. Root cap-dependent gravitropic U-turn of maize root requires light-induced auxin biosynthesis via the YUC pathway in the root apex. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 4581–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Knight, T.A. On the direction of the radicle and germen during the vegetation of seeds. Philos. Trans. Real Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci. 1806, 99, 108–120. [Google Scholar]
  67. Aiken, R.M.; Smucker, A.J.M. Root system regulation of whole plant growth. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1996, 34, 325–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Hochholdinger, F.; Woll, K.; Sauer, M.; Dembisky, D. Genetic dissection of root formation in maize (Zea mays L.) reveals root-type specific developmental programmes. Ann. Bot. 2004, 93, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Gewin, V. Food: An underground revolution. Nature 2010, 466, 552–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Smith, S.; De Smet, I. Root system architecture: Insights from Arabidopsis and cereal crops. Philos. Trans. Real Soc. Lond. PTRBAE Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367, 1441–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. De Oliveira, A.C.; Varshney, R.K. Introduction to Root genomics. In Root Genomics; Costa de Oliveira, A.C., Varshney, R.K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Calleja-Cabrera, J.; Botero, M.; Oñate-Sánchez, L.; Pernas, M. Root Growth Adaptation to Climate Change in Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nielsen, R.L. Visual Indicators of Germination in Corn. Purdue Univ. Extension. Available online: http://www.kingcom.org/news(timeless/GerminationEvents.html (accessed on 20 May 2019).
  74. Esau, K. Plant Anatomy, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  75. Tillich, H.J. Vergleichend morphologische Untersuchungen zur Identität der Gramineen-Primärwurzel. Flora 1977, 166, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Feldman, L.J.; Briggs, W.R. Light-regulated gravitropism in seedling roots of maize. Plant Physiol. 1987, 83, 241–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Woll, K.; Borsuk, L.A.; Stransky, H.; Nettleton, D.; Schnable, P.S.; Hochholdinger, F. Isolation, characterization and pericycle-specific transcriptome analyses of the novel maize lateral and seminal root initiation mutant rum1. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1255–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Sass, J.E. Morphology. In Corn and Corn Improvement; Sprague, G.F., Ed.; American Society of Agronomy Publishers: Madison, WI, USA, 1977; pp. 89–110. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ballard, L.A.T. Physical barriers to germination. Seed Sci. Technol. 1973, 1, 285–303. [Google Scholar]
  80. Feldman, L. The maize root. In The Maize Handbook; Freeling, M., Walbot, V., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ishikawa, H.; Evans, M.L. Specialized zones of development in roots. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109, 725–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Dubrovsky, J.G.; Doerner, P.W.; Colón-Carmona, A.; Rost, T.L. Pericycle cell proliferation and lateral root initiation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 1648–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Lloret, F.; Casero, P.J. Lateral root initiation in plant roots. In Plant Roots; Waisel, Y., Eshek, A., Kafkafi, U., Eds.; The Hidden Hakf. Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 127–155. [Google Scholar]
  84. Dembisky, D.; Woll, K.; Saleem, M.; Liu, Y.; Fu, Y.; Borsuk, L.A.; Lamkemeyer, T.; Fladerer, C.; Madlung, J.; Hochholdinger, F.; et al. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of pericycle cells of the maize primary root. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Lynch, J.P. Steep, cheap and deep: An ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Ann. Bot. 2013, 112, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Chimungu, J.G.; Loades, K.W.; Lynch, J.P. Root anatomical phenes predict root penetration ability and biomechanical properties in maize (Zea Mays). J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 3151–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Larson, R.A. The antioxidants of higher plants. Phytochemistry 1988, 2, 969–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mgonja, M.A.; Ladeinde, T.A.O.; Aken’Ova, M.E. Genetic analysis of mesocotyl length and its relationship with other agronomic characters in rice (Oryza sativa L). Euphytica 1993, 72, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wilhelm, E.D.P.; Biradar, D.P.; Bullock, D.G.; Rayburn, A.L. Endopolyploidization of mesocotyls in Nebraska maize population selected for cold tolerance. Crop. Sci. 1995, 35, 958–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Johanson, J.G.; Cheeseman, J.M. Uptake and distribution of sodium and potassium by corn seedlings: I. Role of the mesocotyl in ‘sodium exclusion’. Plant Physiol. 1983, 73, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Zhao, G.; Wang, J.H. Effect of gibberellin and uniconazole on mesocotyl elongation of dark-grown maize under different seeding depths. Plant Prod. Sci. 2008, 11, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lee, H.; Sasaki, K.; Higashitani, A.; Ahn, S.; Sato, T. Mapping and characterization of quantitative trait loci for mesocotyl elongation in rice (Oriza sativa L.). Rice 2012, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Frawley, L.E.; Orr-Weaver, T.L. Polyploidy. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25, R345–R361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Smith, H. Light quality, photoperception and plant strategy. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1982, 33, 481–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Davies, P.J. The Plant Hormones: Their Nature, Occurrence, and Functions. In Plant Hormones; Davies, P.J., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Dubois, P.G. Genetic and Molecular Characterization of Maize Response to Shade Signal. Cornell University. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/1813/17701 (accessed on 20 October 2010).
  97. Nemhauser, J.L.; Maloof, J.N.; Chory, J. Building integrated models of plant growth and development. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Roundy, B.A.; Call, C.A. Revegetation of arid and semiarid rangelands. In Vegetation Science Application for Rangeland Analysis and Management; Tuller, P.T., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 607–635. [Google Scholar]
  99. Nelson, J.R.; Wilson, A.M.; Goebel, C.J. Factors influencing broadcast seeding in bunchgrass range. J. Range Manag. 1970, 23, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Prasad, T.K. Role of Catalase in Inducing Chilling Tolerance in Pre-Emergent Maize Seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1997, 114, 1369–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Kevei, E.; Nagy, F. Phytochrome controlled signaling cascades in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 2003, 117, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jiao, Y.; Lau, O.S.; Deng, X.W. Light-regulated transcriptional networks in higher plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Fankhauser, C. The phytochromes, a family of red/far-red absorbing photoreceptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 11453–11456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Lin, C. Blue light receptors and signal transduction. Plant Cell Supp. 2002, 14, S207–S225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Lino, M. Inhibitory action of red light on the growth of the maize mesocotyl: Evaluation of the auxin hypothesis. Planta 1982, 156, 388–395. [Google Scholar]
  106. Loercher, L. Phytochrome changes correlated to mesocotyl inhibition in etiolated oat seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1966, 41, 932–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Firn, R.D. Phototropism. In Photomorphogenesis in Plants; Kendrick, R.E., Kronenberg, G.H.M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994; Volume 1, pp. 659–681. [Google Scholar]
  108. Schopfer, P.; Lapierre, C.; Nolte, T. Light-controlled growth of the maize seedling mesocotyl: Mechanical cell-wall changes in the elongation zone and related changes in lignification. Physiol. Plants 2001, 3, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Terry, M.J. Phytochrome chromophore-deficient mutants. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 20, 740–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sawers, R.J.; Linley, P.J.; Farmer, P.R.; Hanley, N.P.; Costich, D.E.; Terry, M.J.; Brunell, T.P. Elongated mesocotyl1, a phytochrome-deficient mutant of maize. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Von Arnim, A.; Deng, X.W. Light control of seedling development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 47, 215–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Cona, A.; Cenci, F.; Cervelli, M.; Federico, R.; Mariottini, P.; Moreno, S.; Angelini, R. Polyamine oxidase, a hydrogen peroxide-producing enzyme, is up-regulated by light and down-regulated by auxin in the outer tissues of the maize mesocotyl. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Dharmasiri, S.; Jayaweera, T.; Dharmasiri, N. Plant Hormone Signalling: Current Perspectives on Perception and Mechanisms of Action. Ceylon J. Sci. 2013, 42, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  114. Effendi, Y.; Jones, A.M.; Scherer, G.F. Auxin-binding-protein1 (ABP1) in phytochrome-B-controlled responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 5065–5074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Takahashi, N. Chemistry of Plant Hormones. SERBIULA 1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hasenstein, K.H.; Evans, M.L. Calcium dependence of rapid auxin action in maize roots. Plant Physiol. 1986, 81, 439–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Zhao, Y. Auxin biosynthesis: A simple two-step pathway converts tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid in plants. Mol Plant. 2012, 5, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Ueda, J.; Sakamoto, M.; Toda, Y.; Miyamoto, K.; Uheda, J.; Daimon, H. Auxin Polar Transport is Essential for the Early Growth Stage of Etiolated Maize (Zea mays L. cv. Honey Bantam) Seedlings. Plant Prod. Sci. 2014, 17, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Vanderhoef, L.N.; Briggs, W.R. Red Light-inhibited Mesocotyl Elongation in Maize Seedlings: I. The Auxin Hypothesis. J. Plant Physiol. 1978, 61, 534–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Dong, Z.; Jiang, C.; Chen, X.; Zhang, T.; Ding, L.; Song, W.; Luo, H.; Lai, J.; Chen, H.; Liu, R.; et al. Maize LAZY1 mediates shoot gravitropism and inflorescence development through regulating auxin transport, auxin signaling, and light response. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 1306–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Saab, I.N.; Sharp, R.E.; Pritchard, J.; Voetberg, G.S. Increased endogenous abscisic acid maintains primary root growth and inhibits shoot growth of maize seedlings at low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 1990, 93, 1329–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Saab, I.N.; Sharp, R.E.; Pritchard, J. Effect of inhibition of abscisic acid accumulation on the spatial distribution of elongation in the primary root and mesocotyl of maize at low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 1992, 99, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Saab, I.N.; Ho, T.; Sharp, R.E. Translatable RNA Populations Associated with Maintenance of Primary Root Elongation and Inhibition of Mesocotyl Elongation by Abscisic Acid in Maize Seedlings at Low Water Potentials. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Zhao, G.; Fu, J.; Wang, G.; Ma, P.; Wu, L.; Wang, J. Gibberellin-induced mesocotyl elongation in deep sowing tolerant maize inbred line. Plant Breed. 2010, 129, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Cheikh, N.; Brenner, M.L.; Huber, J.L.; Huber, S.C. Regulation of sucrose phosphate synthase by gibberellins in soybean and spinach plants. Plant Physiol. 1992, 100, 1238–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Wu, L.L.; Mitchell, J.P.; Cohn, N.S.; Kaufman, P.B. Gibberellin (GA3) enhances cell wall invertase activity and mRNA levels in elongating dwarf pea (Pisum sativum) shoots. Int. J. Plant Sci. 1993, 154, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Frankova, L.; Fry, S.C. Biochemistry and physiological roles of enzymes that ‘cut and paste’ plant cell-wall polysaccharides. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3519–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Soga, A.; Soga, K.; Wakabayashi, K.; Kamisaka, S.; Hoson, T. Suppression of sugar accumulation in coleoptile and mesocotyl cells by light irradiation to etiolated maize seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 260, 153409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Hoson, T. Interaction of gravity with other environmental factors in growth and development: An introduction. Adv. Space Res. 1999, 23, 1971–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Miyamoto, K.; Ueda, J.; Kamisaka, S. Gibberellin-enhanced sugar accumulation in growing subhooks of etiolated Pisum sativum seedlings. Effects of gibberellic acid, indoleacetic acid and cycloheximide on invertase activity, sugar accumulation and growth. J. Physiol. Plant 1993, 88, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hu, S.; Sanchez, D.L.; Wang, C.; Lipka, A.E.; Yin, Y.; Gardner, A.C.; Lubberstedt, T. Brassinosteroid and gibberellin control of seedling traits in maize (Ze mays L.). Plant Sci. 2017, 263, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Morte, A.; Varma, A. Root Engineering; Springer: London, UK, 2014; Volume 2020, p. 2411. [Google Scholar]
  133. Nishizawa, T.; Suge, H. Ethylene and carbon dioxide: Regulation of oat mesocotyl growth. J. Crop. Sci. 1995, 64, 794–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Smalle, J.; Haegman, M.; Kurepa, J.; Van Montagu, M.; Van Der Straeten, D. Ethylene can stimulate Arabidopsis hypocotyl elongation in the light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 2756–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Zhong, S.; Shi, H.; Chang, X.; Ning, W.; Hongwei, G.; Xing Wang, D. Ethylene-orchestrated circuitry coordinates a seedling response to soil cover and etiolated growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 3913–3920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Kende, H. Ethylene biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993, 44, 283–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Fry, S.C.; Smith, R.C.; Renwick, K.F.; Martin, D.J.; Hodge, S.K.; Mathews, K.J. Xyloglucan endotransglycosylase, a new wall-loosening enzyme activity from plants. Biochem. J. 1992, 282, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Galli, F.; Archbold, D.; Pomper, K. Pawpaw fruit chilling injury and antioxidant protection. JASHS 2009, 134, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ye, D.; Xing, J.; Duan, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M. Ethephon-regulated maize internode elongation associated with modeling auxin and gibberellin signal to alter cell wall biosynthesis and modification. Plant Sci. 2020, 290, 110196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yusuf, M.; Khan, T.A.; Fariduddin, Q. Brassinosteroids: Physiological roles and its signalling in plants. In Stress Signaling in Plants: Genomics and Proteomics Perspective; Sarwat, M., Ahmad, A., Abdin, M.Z., Ibrahim, M.M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; Volume 2, pp. 241–260. [Google Scholar]
  141. Li, J.; Chory, J. A putative leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase involved in brassinosteroid signal transduction. Cell 1997, 90, 929–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Wu, C.Y.; Trieu, A.; Radhakrishnan, P.; Kwok, S.F.; Harris, S.; Zhang, K.; Wang, J.; Wan, J.; Zhai, H.; Takatsuto, S.; et al. Brassinosteroids regulate grain flling in rice. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2130–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Vriet, C.; Russinova, E.; Reuzeau, C. From squalene to brassinolide: The steroid metabolic and signaling pathways across the plant kingdom. Mol. Plant 2012, 6, 1738–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Tong, X.; Wang, Y.; Sun, A.; Bello, B.; Ni, S.; Zhang, J. Notched Belly Grain 4, a novel allele of Dwarf11, regulates grain shape and seed germination in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Trevisan, S.; Forestan, C.; Brojanigo, S.; Quaggiotti, S.; Varotto, S. Brassinosteroid application affects the growth and gravitropic response of maize by regulating gene expression in the roots, shoots and leaves. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 92, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Avanci, N.C.; Luche, D.D.; Goldman, G.H.; Goldman, M.H. Jasmonates are phytohormones with multiple functions, including plant defense and reproduction. Genet. Mol. Res. 2010, 9, 484–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Yan, Y.; Christensen, S.; Isakeit, T.; Engelberth, J.; Meeley, R.; Hayward, A.; Emery, R.J.; Kolomiets, M.V. Disruption of OPR7 and OPR8 reveals the versatile functions of jasmonic acid in maize development and defense. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1420–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Yan, Y.; Huang, P.-C.; Borrego, E.; Kolomiets, M. New perspectives into jasmonate roles in maize. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e970442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Xiong, Q.; Ma, B.; Lu, X.; Huang, Y.H.; He, S.J.; Yang, C.; Yin, C.C.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, W.K.; et al. Ethylene-Inhibited Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis Promotes Mesocotyl/Coleoptile Elongation of Etiolated Rice Seedlings. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1053–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Van Delft, G.J.; Graves, J.D.; Fitter, A.H.; Van Ast, A. Striga seed avoidace by deep planting and no tillage in sorghum and maize. Int J. Pest. Manag. 2000, 46, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Moubayidin, L.; Perilli, S.; Dello Ioio, R.; Di Mambro, R.; Costantino, P.; Sabatini, S. The rate of cell differentiation controls the Arabidopsis root meristem growth phase. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 1138–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Márquez, G.; Alarcón, M.V.; Salguero, J. Cytokinin Inhibits Lateral Root Development at the Earliest Stages of Lateral Root Primordium Initiation in Maize Primary Root. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. De Dorlodot, S.; Forster, B.; Pagès, L.; Price, A.; Tuberosa, R.; Draye, X. Root system architecture: Opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Maniou, F.; Chorianopoulou, S.N.; Bouranis, D.L. New insights into trophic aerenchyma formation strategy in maize (Zea mays L.) organs during sulfate deprivation. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Troyer, A.F. Breeding widely adapted, popular maize hybrids. Euphytica 1996, 92, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mas, M.T.; Verdú, A.M.C. Mesocotyl elongation in Digitaria sanguinalis during seedling development. Plant Biosyst. 2016, 150, 1175–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Andrew, M.; Andrew, M.E.; Watson, C.; Percival, S.M. Emergence of small and large seeded grasses: Importance of shoot strength. In Proceedings of the XVIII International Grassland Congress, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 8–9 June 1997; pp. 27–28. [Google Scholar]
  158. Cheeseman, J.M. Pump-leak sodium fluxes in low salt corn roots. J. Membr. Biol. 1982, 70, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Luo, L.; Xia, H.; Lu, B.R. Editorial: Crop Breeding for Drought Resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Hund, A.; Reimer, R.; Messmer, R. A consensus map of QTLs controlling the root length of maize. Plant Soil. 2011, 344, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Lebreton, C.; Lazić-Jančić, V.; Steed, A.; Pekić, S.; Quarrie, S.A. Identification of QTL for drought responses in maize and their use in testing causal relationships between traits. J. Exp. Bot. 1995, 46, 853–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Wallace, J.G.; Zhang, X.; Beyene, Y.; Semagn, K.; Olsen, M.; Prasanna, B.M.; Buckler, E.S. Genome-wide association for plant height and flowering time across 15 tropical maize populations under managed drought stress and well-watered conditions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Crop. Sci. 2016, 56, 2365–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Liu, H.; Zhan, J.; Li, J.; Lu, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Ye, G. Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) for Mesocotyl Elongation in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Multiple Culture Conditions. Genes 2020, 11, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Zhang, H.; Ma, P.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, G.; Baohua, T.; Wang, J.; Wang, G. Mapping QTL controlling maize deep-seeding tolerance-related traits and confirmation of a major QTL for mesocotyl length. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 124, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Pace, J.; Yu, X.; Lubberstedt, T. Genomic prediction of seedling root length in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant J. 2015, 83, 903–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ju, C.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Wang, X.; Yan, J.; Yang, X.; Li, J. Genetic analysis of seedling root traits reveals the association of root trait with other agronomic traits in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Wu, J.; Feng, F.; Lian, X.; Teng, X.; Wei, H.; Yu, H.; Xie, W.; Yan, M.; Fan, P.; Li, Y.; et al. Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) of mesocotyl elongation based on re-sequencing approach in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Shi, Y.; Song, Y.; Zhang, D.; Li, C.; Buckler, E.S.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, T. Joint-linkage mapping and GWAS reveal extensive genetic loci that regulate male inflorescence size in maize. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2016, 14, 1551–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Tian, F.; Bradbury, P.; Brown, P.; Hung, H.; Sun, Q.; Flint-Garcia, S.; Rocheford, T.R.; McMullen, M.D.; Holland, J.B.; Buckle, E.S. Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Xue, Y.; Warburton, M.; Sawkins, M.; Zhang, X.; Setter, T.; Xu, Y.; Grudloyma, P.; Gethi, J.; Ribaut, J.M.; Li, W. Genome-wide association analysis for nine agronomic traits in maize under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126, 2587–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Wang, H.; Wei, J.; Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Ge, Z.; Qian, J.; Fan, Y.; Ni, J.; Xu, J.; Xu, Y.; et al. Integrating GWAS and Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Candidate Genes for Root Morphology Traits in Maize at the Seedling Stage. Genes 2019, 10, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, D.; Tang, H.; Su, B.; Li, C.; Hao, L.; Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Shi, Y.; et al. Genome-wide identification of gene expression in contrasting maize inbred lines under field drought conditions reveals the significance of transcription factors in drought tolerance. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Hu, L.; Xie, Y.; Fan, S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Zhang, B.; Li, H.; Song, J.; Kong, L. Comparative analysis of root transcriptome profiles between drought-tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes in response to water stress. Plant Sci. 2018, 272, 276–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Verslues, P.E.; Agarwal, M.; Katiyar-Agarwal, S.; Zhu, J.K. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J. 2006, 45, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Hansey, C.N.; Vaillancourt, B.; Sekhon, R.S.; de Leon, N.; Kaeppler, S.M.; Buell, C.R. Maize (Zea mays L.) Genome Diversity as Revealed by RNA-Sequencing. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Stelpflug, S.C.; Sekhon, R.S.; Vaillancourt, B.; Hirsch, C.R.; Buell, C.N.; de Leon, N.; Kaeppler, S.M. An Expanded Maize Gene Expression Atlas based on RNA Sequencing and its Use to Explore Root Development. J. Plant Genome Sci. 2016, 9, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Ken, J.B.; McFaline-Figueroa, J.L.; Alexandre, C.M.; Dorrity, M.W.; Saunders, L.; Bubb, K.L.; Trapnell, C.; Fields, S.; Queitsch, C.; Cuperus, J.T. Dynamics of Gene Expression in Single Root Cells of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 993–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Schaefer, R.J.; Michno, J.M.; Jeffers, J.; Hoekenga, O.; Dilkes, B.; Baxter, I.; Myers, C.L. Integrating Coexpression Networks with GWAS to Prioritize Causal Genes in Maize. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 2922–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Zenda, T.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Jin, H.; Dong, A.; Duan, H. Key Maize Drought-Responsive Genes and Pathways Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome and Physiological Analyses of Contrasting Inbred Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Establishment of maize seedlings when utilizing deep planting as an agricultural practice. Elongation of the roots (positive gravitropic and hydrotropic response) and mesocotyl allows the exploration of a wide area of soil by helping to forage water, which ultimately favors early seedling vigor (g: gravity; LenR: root length of 80 and 120 mm, ME: mesocotyl elongation of 5 mm and 10 mm).
Figure 1. Establishment of maize seedlings when utilizing deep planting as an agricultural practice. Elongation of the roots (positive gravitropic and hydrotropic response) and mesocotyl allows the exploration of a wide area of soil by helping to forage water, which ultimately favors early seedling vigor (g: gravity; LenR: root length of 80 and 120 mm, ME: mesocotyl elongation of 5 mm and 10 mm).
Plants 10 01274 g001
Figure 2. Maize kernel structure. The mature maize kernel consists of multiple tissues and organs within the embryo and endosperm, in addition to maternally derived structures. © 2013 Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., modified image. (RAM: root apical meristem; SAM: shoot apical meristem).
Figure 2. Maize kernel structure. The mature maize kernel consists of multiple tissues and organs within the embryo and endosperm, in addition to maternally derived structures. © 2013 Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., modified image. (RAM: root apical meristem; SAM: shoot apical meristem).
Plants 10 01274 g002
Figure 3. Cross-sections of primary roots of maize breed B73 at 7 days post germination. (a) Anatomy of primary root (10×); (b) anatomy of mesocotyl (10×). The lines indicate major structures. (TCA: total cortex area, RootScan®).
Figure 3. Cross-sections of primary roots of maize breed B73 at 7 days post germination. (a) Anatomy of primary root (10×); (b) anatomy of mesocotyl (10×). The lines indicate major structures. (TCA: total cortex area, RootScan®).
Plants 10 01274 g003
Figure 4. Establishment of maize seedlings. The transition from the skotomorphogenic or etiolation (heterotrophic growth) period to the photomorphogenic period (phototropic growth) is primarily regulated by growth of both the roots (PR, LR, and SR) and the mesocotyl. Growth of the roots and mesocotyl is controlled by several regulatory mechanisms, mainly tropisms and hormone signaling (M: mesocotyl, PR: primary root, SR: seminal root, LR: lateral root; LenR: root length of 80 and 120 mm; ME: mesocotyl elongation of 50 mm). Blue line: water requirements throughout phenological cycle of maize; yellow line: energy consumption of the seed.
Figure 4. Establishment of maize seedlings. The transition from the skotomorphogenic or etiolation (heterotrophic growth) period to the photomorphogenic period (phototropic growth) is primarily regulated by growth of both the roots (PR, LR, and SR) and the mesocotyl. Growth of the roots and mesocotyl is controlled by several regulatory mechanisms, mainly tropisms and hormone signaling (M: mesocotyl, PR: primary root, SR: seminal root, LR: lateral root; LenR: root length of 80 and 120 mm; ME: mesocotyl elongation of 50 mm). Blue line: water requirements throughout phenological cycle of maize; yellow line: energy consumption of the seed.
Plants 10 01274 g004
Figure 5. Diagram that shows the main effects of hormones on seedlings traits. (IAA: indole-3-acetic acid, ABA: abscisic acid, GA: gibberellins, E: ethylene, STR: strigolactones, JAS: jasmonates, BR: brassinosteroids, KIT: cytokinins). Their function in relation to growth and development of both the roots (PR: primary root, SR: seminal root, LR: lateral roots) and the mesocotyl (M). (S: seed, LE: leaves, CO2: carbon dioxide, D: dark conditions, L: light). Red circles with lines indicate a positive stimulus and its direction; blue circles with lines indicate a negative stimulus and its direction; nude circles indicate a negative stimulus.
Figure 5. Diagram that shows the main effects of hormones on seedlings traits. (IAA: indole-3-acetic acid, ABA: abscisic acid, GA: gibberellins, E: ethylene, STR: strigolactones, JAS: jasmonates, BR: brassinosteroids, KIT: cytokinins). Their function in relation to growth and development of both the roots (PR: primary root, SR: seminal root, LR: lateral roots) and the mesocotyl (M). (S: seed, LE: leaves, CO2: carbon dioxide, D: dark conditions, L: light). Red circles with lines indicate a positive stimulus and its direction; blue circles with lines indicate a negative stimulus and its direction; nude circles indicate a negative stimulus.
Plants 10 01274 g005
Table 1. List of QTLs related to drought and deep seedling tolerance identified by linkage mapping and association mapping in maize population.
Table 1. List of QTLs related to drought and deep seedling tolerance identified by linkage mapping and association mapping in maize population.
MethodAbiotic StressTraitsMarkerLocus/
QTLs
Candidate
Gene
ReferencesMaize Populations
Linkage mappingDrought toleranceRoot traits *RFLPs13 QTLsNoneRuta et al., 2010Ac7643xAc7729/TZSRW
SNPs364 QTLsNoneLi et al., 2018DH1MxT877
Deep seeding toleranceMesocotyl elongationSSR25 QTLsNoneZhang et al., 2012Inbred line 3681-4 and X178
11 QTLsNoneLiu et al., 2017lines of IBM Syn10 DH population and their parents B73 and Mo17
GWASDrought toleranceRoot traits *SNPs GRMZM2G153722Paece et al., 2015Inbred lines populations
SNPs GRMZM2G148106Zhang et al., 2019Inbred lines populations
SNPs GRMZM2G136364Guo et al., 2020Inbred lines populations
* Root traits: primary root length, seminal root length, axial root length, lateral root length, crown root, and number of seminal roots.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sáenz Rodríguez, M.N.; Cassab, G.I. Primary Root and Mesocotyl Elongation in Maize Seedlings: Two Organs with Antagonistic Growth below the Soil Surface. Plants 2021, 10, 1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071274

AMA Style

Sáenz Rodríguez MN, Cassab GI. Primary Root and Mesocotyl Elongation in Maize Seedlings: Two Organs with Antagonistic Growth below the Soil Surface. Plants. 2021; 10(7):1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sáenz Rodríguez, Mery Nair, and Gladys Iliana Cassab. 2021. "Primary Root and Mesocotyl Elongation in Maize Seedlings: Two Organs with Antagonistic Growth below the Soil Surface" Plants 10, no. 7: 1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071274

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop