Next Article in Journal
Effects of Molybdenum Supplementation in the Form of Ammonium and Sodium Salts on Trophoblast Cell Physiology and Gene Expression In Vitro
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in the Intracellular Composition of Macro and Microminerals After Cryopreservation of the Rabbit Stem/Progenitor Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Ko et al. Timing of Mouse Molar Formation Is Independent of Jaw Length Including Retromolar Space. J. Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 8

1
Department of Anatomy, Physiology & Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada
2
Canadian Light Source, University of Saskatchewan, 44 Innovation Boulevard, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2V3, Canada
3
Clinical Research Support Unit, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Dev. Biol. 2025, 13(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb13010007
Submission received: 20 January 2025 / Accepted: 21 January 2025 / Published: 28 February 2025
There was an error in the original publication [1]. Table S1 was an incomplete version, and Videos S1–S4, along with Tables S2–S8, were mistakenly omitted from the Supplementary Materials. The corrected Tables and Videos appear below:
Supplementary Video S1:
Supplementary Video S2:
Supplementary Video S3:
Supplementary Video S4:
Table S1. Raw measurement data for mouse molar, total jaw, and retromolar lengths. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pFWmqRkFrHfzMSoS_5wRE-cuTsoUUAiQ/view), and Tables S2–S8 appear below.
A correction has been made to the Supplementary Materials, and they are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2221-3759/9/1/8/s1. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Table S2. Descriptions of measurements used for embryonic and perinatal/postnatal specimens ranging from embryonic day (E) 10 to postnatal day (P) 32.
Table S2. Descriptions of measurements used for embryonic and perinatal/postnatal specimens ranging from embryonic day (E) 10 to postnatal day (P) 32.
Measurement Ages Measurement Parameters Notes
E10-18: Lower jaw length (Figure 4)
P0-P32: Lower jaw length (Figure 5)
Anterior-most midline point on (mineralized tissue1 of) the mandible, measured to the; Anterior-most point of subcondylar incisive
Most anterior-superior midline point of the alveolar rim between the incisors, to the; Anterior-most point of subcondylar incisive
1. 
E10-12 measure mandibular prominences (no mineralized jaw tissue was present yet).
2. 
The absolute anteriorposterior value was taken, without any rostral-caudal and medial-lateral angulation, to avoid artificially inflating length. i.e., antero-posterior maximums were take along the same sagittal and transverse planes.
3. 
E10-12 measure maxillary prominences (mineralized jaw tissue was not present yet).
4. 
At E10 no molars have visibly initiated.
5. 
Retromolar length is by nature contingent on the presence of at least a first molar organ.
6. 
E14-16 use the most anterior point of the curve of the posterior aspect of the ramus as a proxy, because the jaw is not sufficiently mineralized to see a mandibular foramen.
E10-18: Upper jaw length (Figure 4)
P0-P32: Upper jaw length (Figure 5)
Anterior-most point of the maxilla3, measured to the; Posterior-most point of the maxilla2.
Most anterior-inferior point of the premaxilla between the incisors, to the; Posterior-most point of the maxilla2.
E10-P32: Molar length (Figure 5)Anterior-most point of molar organ or mineralizing/ed crown, measured to the;
Posterior-most point of the same molar organ or mineralizing/ed crown4.
E12-P32: Retromolar length5 (Figures 4 and 5)Posterior landmark of latest-forming molar organ/crown, measured to the; Posterior-most point of the mandibular foramen2,6 of the mandible.
Table S3. From stages/ages E14 to P32, total upper jaw length in micrometres (µm), and the percent (%) of total upper jaw length occupied by upper first (M1), second (M2) and third (M3) molar mesiodistal crypt or crown lengths, as well as retromolar jaw length (3–35%) and remaining (i.e., non-molar, non retromolar) jaw length (~40–55%) for the diastema and incisor region. For every stage/age: there is space distal to the last-initiated molar; no notable increase in retromolar (RM) jaw length prior to M3 onset, and; M1 > M2 > M3 although M1 is longer and M3 shorter compared to their lower counterparts) Measurements are from the upper left side only, averaged for each stage/age (see Table 5 for full data used in this table).
Table S3. From stages/ages E14 to P32, total upper jaw length in micrometres (µm), and the percent (%) of total upper jaw length occupied by upper first (M1), second (M2) and third (M3) molar mesiodistal crypt or crown lengths, as well as retromolar jaw length (3–35%) and remaining (i.e., non-molar, non retromolar) jaw length (~40–55%) for the diastema and incisor region. For every stage/age: there is space distal to the last-initiated molar; no notable increase in retromolar (RM) jaw length prior to M3 onset, and; M1 > M2 > M3 although M1 is longer and M3 shorter compared to their lower counterparts) Measurements are from the upper left side only, averaged for each stage/age (see Table 5 for full data used in this table).
Stage/Age Upper TJL (µm)MD Molar Length as % of Upper TJL % of Upper TJL
M1 M2 M3 RML Remaining
E121117.42 32.4 - - - -
E13 *3646.20 51.7 - - 2.34 46.0
E141809.08 36.3 21.5 - - 42.2
E152436.74 30.8 17.7 - 4.96 46.5
E162519.10 34.4 12.8 - - 52.8
E173643.86 24.0 15.9 - 5.03 55.1
E183663.62 33.3 14.0 - 9.60 43.1
P04109.65 29.1 16.1 - 6.28 48.5
P34590.23 31.3 18.0 - 5.02 45.7
P63715.06 31.2 16.6 - 5.82 46.4
P84158.42 28.6 16.3 - 10.86 44.2
P124712.02 26.1 13.6 5.9 5.50 48.9
P154992.52 25.0 14.5 8.1 3.98 48.4
P185109.28 24.4 14.6 8.4 4.21 48.4
P218102.80 21.4 13.0 8.1 5.14 52.4
P238646.60 21.0 12.8 7.6 6.40 52.2
P268355.17 21.8 13.1 7.9 5.38 51.8
P289071.21 19.6 12.0 7.3 5.31 55.8
P308328.67 19.5 12.5 7.6 5.12 55.3
P329045.49 19.0 11.6 7.3 7.98 54.1
“-” indicates that at least one molar was not yet forming and thus no value could be measured for that stage/age group. * As noted in the main text and tables, E13 is inexplicably large and we use these data for proportions only. Abbreviations: MD, mesiodistal; RML, retromolar length; TJL, total jaw length.
Table S4. From stages/ages E14 to P32, total lower jaw length in micrometres (µm), and the percent (%) of total lower jaw length occupied by lower first (M1), second (M2) and third (M3) molar mesiodistal crypt or crown lengths, as well as retromolar jaw length (~15–30%) and remaining (i.e., non-molar, non retromolar) jaw length (~35–50%) for the diastema and incisor region. For every stage/age: there is space distal to the last-initiated molar (i.e., no shortage of space); no notable increase in retromolar jaw length before M3 onset (P12); also, the entire molar row length is ~30–40% of the total lower jaw length, and M1 > M2 > M3. Measurements are from the lower left side only, averaged for each stage/age (see Table 5 for full data used in this table).
Table S4. From stages/ages E14 to P32, total lower jaw length in micrometres (µm), and the percent (%) of total lower jaw length occupied by lower first (M1), second (M2) and third (M3) molar mesiodistal crypt or crown lengths, as well as retromolar jaw length (~15–30%) and remaining (i.e., non-molar, non retromolar) jaw length (~35–50%) for the diastema and incisor region. For every stage/age: there is space distal to the last-initiated molar (i.e., no shortage of space); no notable increase in retromolar jaw length before M3 onset (P12); also, the entire molar row length is ~30–40% of the total lower jaw length, and M1 > M2 > M3. Measurements are from the lower left side only, averaged for each stage/age (see Table 5 for full data used in this table).
Stage/Age Lower TJL (µm)MD Molar Length as % of Lower TJL % of Lower TJL
M1 M2 M3 RML Remaining
E121070.77 39.65 - -
E13 *4799.40 20.8 - -
E142304.25 25.5 10.9 - 9.81 53.79
E153493.51 23.1 6.4 - 18.64 51.86
E163612.25 24.5 6.3 - 14.60 54.60
E173576.85 25.9 13.7 - 11.41 48.99
E183827.62 26.8 14.1 - 14.24 44.86
P05057.14 24.3 10.4 - 14.63 50.67
P35171.79 25.1 16.7 - 14.02 44.18
P64431.37 21.2 14.0 - 17.83 53.03
P84721.25 21.4 14.8 - 22.77 41.03
P125102.26 20.0 14.0 7.6 18.94 39.46
P155570.41 18.5 13.3 8.7 22.59 36.91
P185603.85 18.0 12.2 8.8 22.15 38.85
P218447.00 17.3 11.8 9.8 22.27 38.83
P238955.31 16.4 11.8 9.5 23.87 38.43
P269137.99 16.2 10.5 10.0 24.3 39.00
P289472.03 15.0 10.7 8.7 25.03 40.57
P308688.78 16.6 11.2 9.5 25.31 37.40
P329292.92 15.7 10.5 9.3 27.76 36.75
“-” indicates that at least one molar was not yet forming and could not be measured. * As noted in the main text and tables, E13 is inexplicably large and we use these data for proportions only. Abbreviations: MD, mesiodistal; RML, retromolar length; TJL, total jaw length.
Table S5. From E10 to P3, linear regression model for day (independent variable) versus molar length (M1, M2, M3) showing that stage/age accurately predicts molar and jaw lengths but not retromolar lengths before and shortly after birth. M3 is not included as no data for this variable exists at these young stages/ages.
Table S5. From E10 to P3, linear regression model for day (independent variable) versus molar length (M1, M2, M3) showing that stage/age accurately predicts molar and jaw lengths but not retromolar lengths before and shortly after birth. M3 is not included as no data for this variable exists at these young stages/ages.
Dependent VariableJaw TypeEstimate (SE)p-Value
M1Md92.77 (9.92)<0.0001
Mx106.03 (9.64)<0.0001
M2Md76.04 (11.70)0.0013
Mx55.80 (14.79)0.0130
Total jaw lengthMd440.88 (42.04)<0.0001
Mx379.70 (37.06)<0.0001
Retromolar lengthMd56.73 (17.77)0.0242 *
Mx10.91 (19.60)0.6167 *
All quadrants are left side. *, not significant; Md, mandible; Mx, maxilla; SE, standard error.
Table S6. From P6 to P32, linear regression model for day (independent variable) versus molar length (M1, M2, M3), total jaw length, and retromolar length, showing that stage/age accurately predicts all measurements with the exception of upper retromolar length.
Table S6. From P6 to P32, linear regression model for day (independent variable) versus molar length (M1, M2, M3), total jaw length, and retromolar length, showing that stage/age accurately predicts all measurements with the exception of upper retromolar length.
Dependent Variable Jaw Type Estimate (SE) p-Value
M1 Md 23.90 (4.17) 0.0003
Mx 23.89 (5.25)0.0004
M2 Md 16.02 (2.83)0.0003
Mx 21.86 (3.23)<0.0001
M3 Md 25.01 (5.63)0.0030
Mx 17.65 (4.65)0.0055
Total jaw length Md 221.54 (26.71) <0.0001
Mx 240.02 (31.03) <0.0001
Retromolar lengthMd69.03 (7.49)<0.0001
Mx14.31 (4.97)0.0182 *
All quadrants are left side. *, not significant; Md, mandible; Mx, maxilla; SE, standard error.
Table S7. Linear regression model for total jaw length (independent variable) versus molar length (M1, M2, M3) showing that jaw length accurately predicts molar length.
Table S7. Linear regression model for total jaw length (independent variable) versus molar length (M1, M2, M3) showing that jaw length accurately predicts molar length.
Dependent VariableJaw TypeEstimate (SE)p-Value
M1 Md 0.11 (0.01) <0.0001
Mx 0.15 (0.01)0.0001
M2 Md 0.11 (0.01)<0.0001
Mx 0.10 (0.01)<0.0001
M3Md0.11 (0.01)<0.0001
Mx0.07 (0.01)0.0001
All quadrants are left side. Md, mandible; Mx, maxilla; SE, standard error.
Table S8. Linear regression model for retromolar length (independent variable) versus molar length (M1, M2, M3) showing that, in general, retromolar length accurately predicts molar length, particularly in the mandible.
Table S8. Linear regression model for retromolar length (independent variable) versus molar length (M1, M2, M3) showing that, in general, retromolar length accurately predicts molar length, particularly in the mandible.
Dependent VariableJaw TypeEstimate (SE)p-Value
M1 Md 0.31 (0.04) <0.0001
Mx 1.53 (0.32) 0.0003
M2 Md 0.33 (0.04) <0.0001
Mx 1.07 (0.23) 0.0003
M3Md0.34 (0.03)<0.0001
Mx0.57 (0.19)0.02 *
All quadrants are left side. *, not significant; Md, mandible; Mx, maxilla; SE, standard error.

Reference

  1. Ko, D.; Kelly, T.; Thompson, L.; Uppal, J.K.; Rostampour, N.; Webb, M.A.; Zhu, N.; Belev, G.; Mondal, P.; Cooper, D.M.L.; et al. Timing of Mouse Molar Formation Is Independent of Jaw Length Including Retromolar Space. J. Dev. Bio. 2021, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ko, D.; Kelly, T.; Thompson, L.; Uppal, J.K.; Rostampour, N.; Webb, M.A.; Zhu, N.; Belev, G.; Mondal, P.; Cooper, D.M.L.; et al. Correction: Ko et al. Timing of Mouse Molar Formation Is Independent of Jaw Length Including Retromolar Space. J. Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 8. J. Dev. Biol. 2025, 13, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb13010007

AMA Style

Ko D, Kelly T, Thompson L, Uppal JK, Rostampour N, Webb MA, Zhu N, Belev G, Mondal P, Cooper DML, et al. Correction: Ko et al. Timing of Mouse Molar Formation Is Independent of Jaw Length Including Retromolar Space. J. Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 8. Journal of Developmental Biology. 2025; 13(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb13010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ko, Daisy (Jihyung), Tess Kelly, Lacey Thompson, Jasmene K. Uppal, Nasim Rostampour, Mark Adam Webb, Ning Zhu, George Belev, Prosanta Mondal, David M. L. Cooper, and et al. 2025. "Correction: Ko et al. Timing of Mouse Molar Formation Is Independent of Jaw Length Including Retromolar Space. J. Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 8" Journal of Developmental Biology 13, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb13010007

APA Style

Ko, D., Kelly, T., Thompson, L., Uppal, J. K., Rostampour, N., Webb, M. A., Zhu, N., Belev, G., Mondal, P., Cooper, D. M. L., & Boughner, J. C. (2025). Correction: Ko et al. Timing of Mouse Molar Formation Is Independent of Jaw Length Including Retromolar Space. J. Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 8. Journal of Developmental Biology, 13(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb13010007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop