This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Comparative Framework for Multi-Modal Accessibility Assessment Within the 15-Minute City Concept: Application to Parks and Playgrounds in an Indian Urban Neighborhood
by
Swati Bahale
Swati Bahale ,
Amarpreet Singh Arora
Amarpreet Singh Arora
and
Thorsten Schuetze
Thorsten Schuetze *
Department of Architecture, College of Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2025, 14(12), 479; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14120479 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 September 2025
/
Revised: 6 November 2025
/
Accepted: 27 November 2025
/
Published: 2 December 2025
Abstract
Urban neighborhoods in India face an uneven distribution and limited accessibility to parks and playgrounds, particularly in dense mixed-use areas where rapid urbanization constrains green infrastructure planning. To address these challenges, the Sustainable Transportation Assessment Index (SusTAIN) framework was developed to evaluate sustainable transportation in Indian urban neighborhoods, with ‘Accessibility’ identified as a crucial subtheme. Recent advancements in Geographic Information Systems (GISs) and urban data analysis tools have enabled accessibility assessments of parks and playgrounds at a neighborhood scale, yet the OSMnx approach has been only marginally explored and compared in the literature. This study addresses this gap by comparing three tools—the Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS), OSMnx, and Space Syntax—for accessibility assessments of parks and playgrounds in Ward 60 of Kalyan Dombivli city, based on the 15-Minute City concept. Accessibility was evaluated using 25 m and 100 m grid resolutions under peak and non-peak conditions across public and private transportation modes. The findings show that QGIS offers highly consistent results at micro-scale (25 m), while OSMnx provides better accuracy at coarser scales (100 m+). The results were validated with space syntax through integration and choice values. The comparison highlights spatial disparities in accessibility across different tools and transportation modes, including Intermediate Public Transport (IPT), which remains underexplored despite its crucial role in last-mile connectivity. The presented approach can support municipal authorities in optimizing neighborhood mobility and is transferable for applying the SusTAIN framework in other urban contexts.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Bahale, S.; Arora, A.S.; Schuetze, T.
Comparative Framework for Multi-Modal Accessibility Assessment Within the 15-Minute City Concept: Application to Parks and Playgrounds in an Indian Urban Neighborhood. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2025, 14, 479.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14120479
AMA Style
Bahale S, Arora AS, Schuetze T.
Comparative Framework for Multi-Modal Accessibility Assessment Within the 15-Minute City Concept: Application to Parks and Playgrounds in an Indian Urban Neighborhood. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2025; 14(12):479.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14120479
Chicago/Turabian Style
Bahale, Swati, Amarpreet Singh Arora, and Thorsten Schuetze.
2025. "Comparative Framework for Multi-Modal Accessibility Assessment Within the 15-Minute City Concept: Application to Parks and Playgrounds in an Indian Urban Neighborhood" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 14, no. 12: 479.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14120479
APA Style
Bahale, S., Arora, A. S., & Schuetze, T.
(2025). Comparative Framework for Multi-Modal Accessibility Assessment Within the 15-Minute City Concept: Application to Parks and Playgrounds in an Indian Urban Neighborhood. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14(12), 479.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14120479
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.