Next Article in Journal
Phytohormone and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Endogenous Cytokinins Affect Kiwifruit Growth under Restricted Carbon Supply
Next Article in Special Issue
A Case Report of Switching from Specific Vendor-Based to R-Based Pipelines for Untargeted LC-MS Metabolomics
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolite Profiling and Classification of Developing Styrax tonkinensis Kernels
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of Fecal and Urinary Metabolite Perturbations Induced by Chronic Ethanol Treatment in Mice by UHPLC-MS/MS Targeted Profiling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/metabo10010022
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Direct Implementation of Intestinal Permeability Test in NMR Metabolomics for Simultaneous Biomarker Discovery—A Feasibility Study in a Preterm Piglet Model

by
Masoumeh Alinaghi
1,
Duc Ninh Nguyen
2,
Per Torp Sangild
2 and
Hanne Christine Bertram
1,*
1
Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, Kirstinebjergvej 10, 5792 Aarslev, Denmark
2
Section for Comparative Pediatrics and Nutrition, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 68, 1860 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2020, 10(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10010022
Submission received: 24 October 2019 / Revised: 22 December 2019 / Accepted: 29 December 2019 / Published: 1 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolomics Methodologies and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Measurement of intestinal permeability (IP) is often used in the examination of inflammatory gastrointestinal disorders. IP can be assessed by measurement of urinary recovery of ingested non-metabolizable lactulose (L) and mannitol (M). The present study aimed to examine how measurements of IP can be integrated in a NMR-based metabolomics approach for a simultaneous quantification of L/M ratio and biomarker exploration. For this purpose, plasma and urine samples were collected from five-day-old preterm piglets (n = 20) with gastrointestinal disorders (subjected to intra-amniotic lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 1 mg/fetus)) after they had been administrated a 5% lactulose and 5% mannitol solution (15 mL/kg). The collected plasma and urine samples were analyzed by 1H NMR-based metabolomics. Urine L/M ratio measured by 1H NMR spectroscopy showed high correlation with the standard measurement of the urinary recoveries by enzymatic assays (r = 0.93, p < 0.05). Partial least squares (PLS) regressions and correlation analyses between L/M ratio and NMR metabolomics data revealed that L/M ratio was positively correlated with plasma lactate, acetate and succinate levels and negatively correlated with urinary hippuric acid and glycine. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that NMR metabolomics enables simultaneous IP testing and discovery of biomarkers associated with an impaired intestinal permeability.

1. Introduction

The gut is one of the most crucial organs acting as a functional barrier for interaction with the environment, and therefore, intestinal permeability (IP) plays an important role in health and disease [1]. The intestinal barrier allows the absorption of nutrients while preventing the penetration of macromolecules and microorganisms into the body [2]. Alterations in IP can be sign of an inflammatory response to pathogens [3,4].
Immaturity of the immune system and digestive tract in preterm birth may lead to the development of inflammatory diseases [2,5]. Altered IP and leaky gut have been reported during gastrointestinal complications such as necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) [6,7] and gut-associated sepsis, suggesting failure of the immature intestine to properly develop the barrier function and adaption to extrauterine life [8,9]. NEC is the most common gastrointestinal disorder in premature infants, causing significant neurodevelopmental mortality in preterm infants [10,11]. Gut diseases are often described by a dysregulation of the colonic microbiota alongside their metabolic activities. The gut microbiome is important in the attainment of energy and nutrients in preterm neonates, which is essential for the fast development of organs together with the gut. A dysfunctional gut microbiome in preterm neonates with NEC can restrain the accessibility of symbiotic metabolites, and different neurotransmitters, which affects the development of the digestive, immune, and nervous systems in infected neonates. The immature intestinal barrier in the preterm neonate has been shown to mature postnatally. Thus, neonates with abnormal or delayed bacterial colonization of the gut may be at an increased risk of intestinal inflammation and injury due to an immature or defective intestinal barrier that allows the systemic entry of microbes, their products, or toxins from the gut lumen.
Metabolites can be considered as the signatures of biochemical activities and may be directly associated with the disease phenotypes in biological systems. Urinary metabolite levels are affected by energy and nutrient intake, metabolisms in the body and also environmental factors including microbiota that keep a close cross-talk with the intestinal system. Thus, disorders in the gastrointestinal tract might alter the metabolic levels of the body fluids which can be reflected in the blood and urine. Determination of the IP metabolite biomarkers in plasma and urine by NMR-based metabolomics could potentially be of importance in gastrointestinal disorders, particularly in preterm infants due to the fact that metabolites can reflect the excessive fermentation of undigested nutrients in the colon. In order to determine IP, conventionally a combination of non-metabolizable sugars such as lactulose (L) and mannitol (M) is implemented by oral ingestion. The ratio of the urinary excretion of lactulose, a relatively large molecule regarded as a measure of paracellular permeability, to mannitol, a small molecule regarded as a measure of transcellular permeability, is used as an indicator of the barrier function [12]. Under intestinal damage, the IP of the large molecules is increased while the permeability of the small molecules is unchanged [13]. However, in the case of severe damage, the permeability of the small molecules is decreased [14]. Therefore, L/M ratios can be considered as an indicator of IP. Calculation of the ratio of sugars has the benefit of controlling the fluctuation in urine dilution, gastric emptying, intestinal fluid volume, gastric transit time as well as impaired renal excretion, providing a direct measurement of the paracellular absorptive capacity in the gastrointestinal tract [15]. Traditionally lactulose and mannitol are determined by chromatographic methods or enzymatic assays [16,17,18]. However, 1H NMR spectroscopy is a rapid and non-invasive method for simultaneous detection and quantification of a large number of metabolites in complex biological fluids in a single experiment. Consequently, 1H NMR spectroscopy could be an appropriate approach for the simultaneous quantification of carbohydrates and exploration of metabolite biomarkers in urine [19,20]. However, with NMR spectroscopy, the number of identifiable metabolites is lower than LC-MS-based methods and is more expensive than the enzymatic assays methods.
In this study, determination of IP by using 1H NMR spectroscopy was first evaluated and compared with a standard measurement of urinary lactulose and mannitol by enzymatic assays. Using a piglet model for preterm infants, we hypothesized that an increased IP may be associated with perturbations in urine and blood metabolites, and metabolite biomarkers reflecting changes in IP may be revealed. To test this hypothesis, NMR metabolomics was used to evaluate the association between impaired intestinal barrier function and the metabolome of premature piglet neonates predisposed to a gastrointestinal disorder by investigating the correlations between IP measurements and the levels of plasma and urine metabolites.

2. Results

2.1. Method Elucidation

Plasma and urine samples from preterm newborn pigs were analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy, and a total of 38 and 34 metabolites were assigned in plasma and urine biofluids, respectively (Figure 1a,b).
For quantification of lactulose and mannitol, NMR resonances that do not overlap with other signals should preferably be chosen. Hence, mannitol’s doublet at 3.8 ppm and lactulose’s doublet at 4.56 ppm were used for quantitative estimation of L/M ratio. The correlation between L/M ratio quantified by NMR spectroscopy and the standard measurement of L/M ratio was examined by linear regression. A strong correlation between L/M ratios determined with the standard assay and ratio obtained from quantification by NMR spectroscopy was obtained (r = 0.93, p < 0.05) (Figure 2).

2.2. Biomarker Exploration

In order to elucidate correlations between the L/M ratio and the metabolomes derived from NMR, partial least squares (PLS) models were performed between metabolites quantified from the obtained NMR spectra and corresponding L/M ratios. A PLS model with one component (R2 = 0.75, Q2 = 0.50, and root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV) = 6.2 × 10−3) revealed that several plasma metabolites had a significant correlation with the quantified urine L/M ratio (Figure 3a and Figure S1a,b). The most prominent metabolites in the PLS regression model are illustrated by the variable importance in projection (VIP) score plot. The metabolites acetate, 2-hydroxybutyrate, 2-oxoglutarate, citrate, glucose, lactate, succinate, and glutamate all had a VIP score above 1 and can, thus, be considered important for the ability of the PLS regression model to build a quantitative relationship between the quantified metabolites and the L/M ratio (Figure 3b and Figure S1c,d). For the urine samples, a PLS regression model with two components yielded an R2 value of 0.73, Q2 value of 0.51, and RMSECV of 6.2 × 10−3, showing a significant correlation between the urine metabolites and L/M ratio. (Figure 3c). From the VIP score plot, it was evident that the urine metabolites hippuric acid, fumarate, succinate, urea, glycine, choline, and alanine were the most important variables (Figure 3d).
PLS models were supplemented with correlations analyses between plasma and urine metabolites and L/M ratio, which revealed significant positive correlations between the L/M ratio and plasma 2-hydroxybutyrate, 2-oxoglutarate, acetate, citrate, glucose, glutamate, lactate, and succinate (Figure 4). Urinary hippuric acid showed a significant negative correlation with L/M ratio. Without reaching the significance level, the urine metabolites fumarate, choline, and succinate showed positive correlation while glycine, alanine, and urea exhibited a negative correlation.

3. Discussion

3.1. Method Elucidation

Evaluation of IP is useful for the diagnosis of small intestinal diseases and evaluation of treatment intervention studies [21] especially in the early life of immature infants [5]. Minimally-absorbed and non-metabolized sugars such as lactulose and mannitol are commonly used for the assessment of barrier functions. The estimation of L/M ratios by HPLC has some analytical difficulties such as the necessity for being coupled to a pulsed amperometric, refractive index, evaporative light scattering detector, fluorescence, or mass spectrometry [16,17], which are not always convenient. Moreover, gas chromatography methods require a derivatization step [22]. Enzymatic and colorimetric methods are time-consuming and do not allow a simultaneous measurement of both sugars. 1H NMR spectroscopy is a rapid and convenient method without any additional sample preparation for the analysis of urinary sugars in a single analysis. In the present study, we first elucidated the potential of using 1H NMR spectroscopy for quantification of L/M ratio in an IP test with the ingestion of non-metabolizable lactulose (L) and mannitol (M) in preterm piglets with a gastrointestinal disorder. Correlation analysis between urinary L/M ratios determined by a standard measurement by enzymatic assays and L/M ratios determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy showed high correlations (r = 0.93). Thus, it was evident that significantly-correlated values to standard measurement were obtained with the applied NMR methodology, and the study demonstrated the usefulness of 1H NMR spectroscopy for a simple and reliable quantification of L/M ratios in urine. 1H NMR spectroscopy has the advantages of being rapid and non-invasive, and offers simple sample preparation. Former studies have investigated the use of 1H NMR spectroscopy for a simple and reliable quantification of L/M ratio in urine from healthy subjects [23] and subjects suffering from liver disease and malabsorption syndrome [20,24]. In this work, the use of a projected J-resolved NMR experiment was demonstrated to be useful for quantification of the L/M ratio [23]. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to examine the use of NMR spectroscopy for quantification of L/M ratios in a model resembling infants. To combine the L/M quantification with a simultaneous metabolomics analysis, a one-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (1D NOESY) NMR experiment was applied.

3.2. Biomarker Exploration

Since 1H NMR spectroscopy is a non-selective technique that allows for the detection of numerous low-molecular weight proton-containing metabolites, the NMR-based analysis of L/M ratio enabled the simultaneous measurement of several other abundant metabolites present in urine which may reflect alterations in the gastrointestinal system. Furthermore, the NMR-based metabolomics approach was extended to also include measurements on blood to be able to explore potential blood metabolites related to IP. By employing PLS regressions and correlation analyses, the present study revealed significant correlations between IP and plasma and urine level plasma lactate, succinate, citrate, acetate, and 2-hydroxybutyrate, as well as urine hippuric acid, fumarate, and glycine. Thus, the findings suggest that perturbations in these metabolites may reflect conditions associated with intestinal barrier dysfunctions. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the systemic metabolite alterations and perturbations associated with an increased IP by using a 1H NMR spectroscopic approach.
The present study showed that the IP has a significant positive correlation with plasma lactate. An intestinal disorder or dysbiosis may lead to an increased number of bacteria in the lumen of the infected intestine by efflux due to the impaired intestinal permeability and host defenses against bacterial overgrowth [25,26]. This bacterial proliferation could lead to an enhanced generation of bacterial metabolites and fermentation products. Lactate is the intermediate product of bacterial fermentation produced by many bacteria found in the gastrointestinal tract including Klebsiella, Lactobacillus species, Escherichia coli, and Bacteroides species [27], and are further metabolized to acetate. Succinate, in addition to other metabolites, is also produced by some bacteria as the end product of glucose fermentation. Products of bacteria metabolism can leak into the blood circulation due to an injured mucosa and increased IP in the disease process [25]. Thus, the accumulation of the bacteria fermentation products in the systemic circulation can reflect impaired gut permeability induced by some gastrointestinal disorders. Furthermore, metabolites such as lactate and succinate may also derive from the host’s own endogenous metabolism and reflect disruption of the host’s homeostasis under inflamed conditions.
In this study, an impaired IP was negatively correlated to urinary glycine. Results of some studies suggest that higher levels of glycine are linked to an improved intestinal mucosal barrier function, which is explained by a stimulation of protein synthesis and preservation of the intracellular redox states in enterocytes in piglets [28,29,30]. Furthermore, glycine concentration in the plasma of low-birth-weight neonates has been found to be lower in comparison to their normal-birth-weight counterparts [31]. Therefore, our findings corroborate other studies and suggest a possible association between a reduced glycine level in urine and intestinal dysfunction in preterm piglets.
The present study identified a negative correlation between IP and urinary levels of hippuric acid. Hippuric acid is a urinary host-bacterial co-metabolite, and its biosynthesis involves two phases, including gut microbial metabolism of aromatic dietary compounds to benzoate following conjugation of benzoate with glycine. Even though dietary benzoate can lead to differences in the urine hippuric acid levels [32], its lower level is reported in inflammatory bowel diseases and Crohn’s disease due to an altered gut microbial metabolism [33,34]. Alterations in the urine level of hippuric acid may thus reflect systemic effects of an altered gut microbial metabolism.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animal Experimental Procedures

All animal experiments were approved by the Danish National Committee of Animal Experimentation. To investigate the IP and metabolic influences of prenatal lipopolysaccharide (LPS), five pregnant sows (Large White × Danish Landrace × Duroc) were operated by laparotomy at d 103 of gestation (term at 117 ± 2 days of gestation), and every fetus received an IA dose of 1 mg LPS (from E.coli 055:B5, Sigma Aldrich, Copenhagen, Denmark) in an area near to the mouth, as previously described [24]. Afterward, cesarean section was performed to deliver the preterm pigs at d 106 (89–92% gestation age). A detailed description of the animal procedure and nutritional composition can be found elsewhere [35,36,37]. Clinical circumstances and fecal features were assessed twice daily as previously described [24]. The animal procedures were all approved by the Danish National Committee on Animal Experimentation (2014-15-0201-00418).

4.2. Intestinal Permeability Test

The IP was evaluated by providing an enteral bolus of 15 mL/kg of a 5% lactulose (Sigma-Aldrich, Copenhagen, Denmark) and 5% mannitol solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Copenhagen, Denmark) exactly 3 h before euthanasia. Urine was collected at the time of euthanasia and stored at −20 °C until assayed. Concentrations of lactulose and mannitol were measured in urine by an enzymatic spectrophotometric method (Pentra 400, Irvine, CA, USA). In the presence of mannitol dehydrogenase, mannitol was oxidized by NAD into the fructose and NADH. The amount of NADH was detected by spectrophotometry at 340 nm. Lactulose was also hydrolyzed into galactose and fructose. Fructose was then catalyzed into fructose-6-phosphate and to glucose-6-phosphate by phosphoglucoisomerase. Glucose-6-phosphate was dehydrogenated by adding glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase in the presence of NADP to form NADPH. The concentration of NADPH is proportional to the concentration of lactulose and can be measured spectrophotometrically at 340 nm. L/M ratios quantified by enzymatic assay are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

4.3. NMR Sample Preparation

Amicon Ultra 0.5-mL 3 kDa (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) was used to filter the thawed plasma samples at 10,000× g at 4 °C for 3 h to remove lipid and proteins. For NMR measurement, 300 µL plasma sample, 250 µL D2O and 50 µL D2O containing 0.05% sodium trimethylsilyl-[2,2,3,3-2H4]-1-propionate (TSP; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as an internal chemical shift reference was added to a 5 mm NMR tube (Wilmad, Vineland, NJ, USA). For the urine samples, 100 µL phosphate buffer in D2O [38] (pH = 7.4) containing 0.05% TSP was transferred to 500 µL of thawed urine in a 5 mm NMR tube.

4.4. NMR Data Acquisition and Preprocessing

NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin Gmbh, Rheinstettten, Germany) equipped with a 5-mm 1H TXI probe and operating at a 1H frequency of 600.13 MHz. A target temperature of 298 K and a relaxation delay of 5 s were applied. A total of 128 free induction decays (FIDs) were acquired, and the acquisition parameters included 32,768 data points, a spectral width of 7288 Hz and an acquisition time of 2.25 s. A one-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (1D NOESY) experiment with a single 90° pulse sequence and pre-saturation of the water resonance was conducted.
The spectra were processed with zero-filling prior to Fourier transformation. All spectra were referenced to the TSP signal at 0.0 ppm. An experimental window function with a line-broadening factor of 0.3 Hz was applied to all FIDs before Fourier transformation. The resulting spectra were manually phase- and baseline-corrected by polynomial using the TopspinTM 3.0 software (Bruker BioSpin, Gmbh, Rheinstetten, Germany). The NMR resonances were assigned based on 2D NMR spectroscopy, the Human Metabolome Database [39], existing literature [40,41,42] and Chenomx NMR Suite 7.7 (Chenomx Inc, Edmonton, AB, Canada).

4.5. Data Analysis

Quantitative analysis of metabolites was performed on data by the integration of peak areas using TopspinTM 3.0 software (Bruker BioSpin, Gmbh, Rheinstetten, Germany). The metabolites were quantified relative to the area under the TSP peak. The analysis was performed on quantified NMR metabolites obtained from plasma and urine samples of the same piglets. The final NMR data sets of plasma and urine had the size of 20 × 23 and 20 × 18, respectively, with the rows representing the quantified metabolites of each piglet and the columns representing each of the quantified metabolites.
Linear regression was performed between the standard measurement of urinary L/M and the quantified urine L/M ratio by NMR spectroscopy. To determine whether the IP was correlated with the quantified metabolites of plasma and urine profiles, partial least squares (PLS) regressions were performed between the quantified metabolites (X) and quantified urine L/M ratio by enzymatic assay (y). Orthogonal signal correction (OSC) [43] was performed on the X matrix and the data were autoscaled prior to PLS regressions. The quality of the model was evaluated by the goodness-of-fit parameter R2 and the predictive ability parameter Q2 using the leave-one-out validation. Variable importance in projection (VIP) scores were calculated to evaluate the importance of each metabolite in the projection used in a PLS model [44]. The metabolites with VIP scores greater than 1.0 were regarded as important variables.
Moreover, Pearson’s correlations between quantified plasma and urine metabolites and the urinary L/M ratio quantified by NMR spectroscopy were calculated and coefficients and p-values of correlations were evaluated. The concentration of the quantified metabolites as well as the L/M ratios quantified by NMR spectroscopy are provided in the Supplementary Materials. Matlab (version R2016b, MathWorks Inc., Middlesex, MA, USA) was used for data analysis and visualization.

5. Conclusions

NMR-based metabolomics analysis of LPS-induced preterm piglets revealed that 1H -NMR spectroscopy is a reliable and rapid technique to estimate the L/M ratio in urine samples. To our knowledge, this is the first study that has combined NMR-based L/M determination with NMR-based metabolomics to assess IP biomarkers in preterm piglets with systemic inflammation. Our findings suggest that increased plasma lactate, acetate, and succinate levels, as well as decreased levels of urinary hippuric acid and glycine can be considered potential markers of an impaired IP induced by gastrointestinal disorders.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/10/1/22/s1, Figure S1: Leave-one-out cross validation for PLS model (a) and (b) plasma NMR data, (c) and (d) urine NMR data. (a) Q2 value for PLS on plasma data, and (b) RMSECV for PLS model on plasma data. (a) Q2 value for PLS on urine data, and (b) RMSECV for PLS model on urine data.

Author Contributions

M.A. prepared samples for NMR analysis and acquired the NMR data, carried out the data analysis, interpreted data, and drafted the manuscript. D.N.N. and P.T.S. conceived and developed the experimental design and performed the animal study and sampling. H.C.B. supervised the metabolomics study including data analysis and interpretation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was a part of the project ‘Bioactive milk diet to stimulate immune defense in infants born with perinatal inflammation’, which has received financial support from Arla Food for Health, which is a consortium between Arla Food amba, Arla Foods Ingredients Group, Aarhus University and University of Copenhagen. The study also received support from the NEOMUNE and NEOCOL projects from Innovation Fund Denmark.

Acknowledgments

Nina Eggers is thanked for her technical assistance with the NMR analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farhadi, A.; Banan, A.; Fields, J.; Keshavarzian, A. Intestinal barrier: An interface between health and disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2003, 18, 479–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Elburg, R.; Uil, J.; De Monchy, J.; Heymans, H. Intestinal permeability in pediatric gastroenterology. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1992, 27, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hooper, L.V.; Littman, D.R.; Macpherson, A.J. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science 2012, 336, 1268–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Maynard, C.L.; Elson, C.O.; Hatton, R.D.; Weaver, C.T. Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system. Nature 2012, 489, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sangild, P.T. Gut responses to enteral nutrition in preterm infants and animals. Exp. Biol. Med. 2006, 231, 1695–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Halpern, M.D.; Denning, P.W. The role of intestinal epithelial barrier function in the development of NEC. Tissue Barriers 2015, 3, e1000707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Moore, S.A.; Nighot, P.; Reyes, C.; Rawat, M.; McKee, J.; Lemon, D.; Hanson, J.; Ma, T.Y. Intestinal barrier dysfunction in human necrotizing enterocolitis. J. Pediatric Surg. 2016, 51, 1907–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rouwet, E.V.; Heineman, E.; Buurman, W.A.; Terriet, G.; Ramsay, G.; Blanco, C.E. Intestinal permeability and carrier-mediated monosaccharide absorption in preterm neonates during the early postnatal period. Pediatric Res. 2002, 51, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Weaver, L.; Laker, M.; Nelson, R. Enhanced intestinal permeability in preterm babies with bloody stools. Arch. Dis. Child. 1984, 59, 280–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lin, P.W.; Stoll, B.J. Necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet 2006, 368, 1271–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Neu, J.; Walker, W.A. Necrotizing Enterocolitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Travis, S.; Menzies, I. Intestinal permeability: Functional assessment and significance. Clin. Sci. 1992, 82, 471–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Söderholm, J.D.; Peterson, K.H.; Olaison, G.; Franzén, L.E.; Weström, B.; Magnusson, K.-E.; Sjödahl, R. Epithelial permeability to proteins in the noninflamed ileum of Crohn’s disease? Gastroenterology 1999, 117, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Menzies, I.; Pounder, R.; Heyer, S.; Laker, M.; Bull, J.; Wheeler, P.; Creamer, B. Abnormal intestinal permeability to sugars in villous atrophy. Lancet 1979, 314, 1107–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Weaver, L.; Laker, M.; Nelson, R. Intestinal permeability in the newborn. Arch. Dis. Child. 1984, 59, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Yu, A.; Qu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, H.; Li, J. Studies on intestinal permeability of cirrhotic patients by analysis lactulose and mannitol in urine with HPLC/RID/MS. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 2339–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lostia, A.M.; Lionetto, L.; Principessa, L.; Evangelisti, M.; Gamba, A.; Villa, M.P.; Simmaco, M. A liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method for the evaluation of intestinal permeability. Clin. Biochem. 2008, 41, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Lee, B.; Thompson, M.; Glass, R.; Lee, R.C.; Figueroa, D.; Gilman, R.; Taylor, D.; Stephenson, C. Lactulose–mannitol intestinal permeability test in children with diarrhea caused by rotavirus and cryptosporidium. J. Pediatric Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2000, 31, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jayalakshmi, K.; Ghoshal, U.C.; Kumar, S.; Misra, A.; Roy, R.; Khetrapal, C.L. Assessment of small intestinal permeability using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. J. Gastrointest. Liver Dis. 2009, 18, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bala, L.; Nagana Gowda, G.; Ghoshal, U.; Misra, A.; Bhandari, M.; Khetrapal, C. 1H NMR spectroscopic method for diagnosis of malabsorption syndrome: A pilot study. NMR Biomed. 2004, 17, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Uil, J.; Mulder, C.; VanBerge-Henegouwen, G.; Heymans, H. Clinical implications of the sugar absorption test: Intestinal permeability test to assess mucosal barrier function. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl. 1997, 223, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Farhadi, A.; Keshavarzian, A.; Holmes, E.W.; Fields, J.; Zhang, L.; Banan, A. Gas chromatographic method for detection of urinary sucralose: Application to the assessment of intestinal permeability. J. Chromatogr. B 2003, 784, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stryeck, S.; Horvath, A.; Leber, B.; Stadlbauer, V.; Madl, T. NMR spectroscopy enables simultaneous quantification of carbohydrates for diagnosis of intestinal and gastric permeability. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Nguyen, D.N.; Thymann, T.; Goericke-Pesch, S.K.; Ren, S.; Wei, W.; Skovgaard, K.; Damborg, P.; Brunse, A.; van Gorp, C.; Kramer, B.W. Prenatal Intra-Amniotic Endotoxin Induces Fetal Gut and Lung Immune Responses and Postnatal Systemic Inflammation in Preterm Pigs. Am. J. Pathol. 2018, 188, 2629–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sun, X.-Q.; Fu, X.-B.; Rong-Zhang, Y.L.; Deng, Q.; Jiang, X.-G.; Sheng, Z.-Y. Relationship between plasma D (-)-lactate and intestinal damage after severe injuries in rats. World J. Gastroenterol. 2001, 7, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fu, X.-B.; Yang, Y.-H.; Sun, T.-Z.; Gu, X.-M.; Jiang, L.-X.; Sun, X.-Q.; Sheng, Z.-Y. Effect of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion on expressions of endogenous basic fibroblast growth factor and transforming growth factor β in lung and its relation with lung repair. World J. Gastroenterol. 2000, 6, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Smith, S.M.; Eng, R.H.; Buccini, F. Use of D-lactic acid measurements in the diagnosis of bacterial infections. J. Infect. Dis. 1986, 154, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, W.; Wu, Z.; Lin, G.; Hu, S.; Wang, B.; Dai, Z.; Wu, G. Glycine stimulates protein synthesis and inhibits oxidative stress in pig small intestinal epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 1540–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, W.; Sun, K.; Ji, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, W.; Dai, Z.; Wu, G. Glycine regulates expression and distribution of claudin-7 and ZO-3 proteins in intestinal porcine epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 964–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wu, G. Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals: A paradigm shift in protein nutrition. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lassala, A.; Bazer, F.W.; Cudd, T.A.; Datta, S.; Keisler, D.H.; Satterfield, M.C.; Spencer, T.E.; Wu, G. Parenteral administration of L-arginine enhances fetal survival and growth in sheep carrying multiple fetuses. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Sieber, R.; Bütikofer, U.; Bosset, J. Benzoic acid as a natural compound in cultured dairy products and cheese. Int. Dairy J. 1995, 5, 227–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Williams, H.R.; Cox, I.J.; Walker, D.G.; North, B.V.; Patel, V.M.; Marshall, S.E.; Jewell, D.P.; Ghosh, S.; Thomas, H.J.; Teare, J.P. Characterization of inflammatory bowel disease with urinary metabolic profiling. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 104, 1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Williams, H.R.; Cox, I.J.; Walker, D.G.; Cobbold, J.F.; Taylor-Robinson, S.D.; Marshall, S.E.; Orchard, T.R. Differences in gut microbial metabolism are responsible for reduced hippurate synthesis in Crohn’s disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010, 10, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Jensen, M.L.; Thymann, T.; Cilieborg, M.S.; Lykke, M.; Mølbak, L.; Jensen, B.B.; Schmidt, M.; Kelly, D.; Mulder, I.; Burrin, D.G. Antibiotics modulate intestinal immunity and prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonatal piglets. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2013, 306, G59–G71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sangild, P.T.; Petersen, Y.M.; Schmidt, M.; Elnif, J.; Petersen, T.K.; Buddington, R.K.; Greisen, G.; Michaelsen, K.F.; Burrin, D.G. Preterm birth affects the intestinal response to parenteral and enteral nutrition in newborn pigs. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 2673–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Shen, R.L.; Pontoppidan, P.E.; Rathe, M.; Jiang, P.; Hansen, C.F.; Buddington, R.K.; Heegaard, P.M.; Müller, K.; Sangild, P.T. Milk diets influence doxorubicin-induced intestinal toxicity in piglets. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2016, 311, G324–G333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Beckonert, O.; Keun, H.C.; Ebbels, T.M.; Bundy, J.; Holmes, E.; Lindon, J.C.; Nicholson, J.K. Metabolic profiling, metabolomic and metabonomic procedures for NMR spectroscopy of urine, plasma, serum and tissue extracts. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wishart, D.S.; Jewison, T.; Guo, A.C.; Wilson, M.; Knox, C.; Liu, Y.; Djoumbou, Y.; Mandal, R.; Aziat, F.; Dong, E. HMDB 3.0—The human metabolome database in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 41, D801–D807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bouatra, S.; Aziat, F.; Mandal, R.; Guo, A.C.; Wilson, M.R.; Knox, C.; Bjorndahl, T.C.; Krishnamurthy, R.; Saleem, F.; Liu, P. The human urine metabolome. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tang, H.; Wang, Y.; Nicholson, J.K.; Lindon, J.C. Use of relaxation-edited one-dimensional and two dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to improve detection of small metabolites in blood plasma. Anal. Biochem. 2004, 325, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nicholson, J.K.; Foxall, P.J.; Spraul, M.; Farrant, R.D.; Lindon, J.C. 750 MHz 1H and 1H-13C NMR spectroscopy of human blood plasma. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 793–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sjöblom, J.; Svensson, O.; Josefson, M.; Kullberg, H.; Wold, S. An evaluation of orthogonal signal correction applied to calibration transfer of near infrared spectra. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 44, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chong, I.-G.; Jun, C.-H. Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005, 78, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metabolites 10 00022 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra (obtained at 600 MHz) and assigned metabolites of (a) plasma and (b) urine. key: 1: acetate; 2: acetylcholine; 3: alanine; 4: 2-aminoadipate; 5: betaine; 6: choline; 7: citrate; 8: creatine; 9: creatinine; 10: dimethylamine; 11: ethanol; 12: glucose; 13: glutamate; 14: glutamine; 15: glycine; 16: isobutyrate; 17: isoleucine; 18: isopropanol; 19: lactate; 20: lactulose; 21: leucine; 22: lysine; 23: mannitol; 24: methanol; 25: methionine; 26: myo-inositol; 27: N-acetylglutamate; 28: N-acetylneuraminic acid; 29: propylene glycol; 30: pyruvate; 31: raffinose; 32: succinate; 33: taurine; 34: valine.
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra (obtained at 600 MHz) and assigned metabolites of (a) plasma and (b) urine. key: 1: acetate; 2: acetylcholine; 3: alanine; 4: 2-aminoadipate; 5: betaine; 6: choline; 7: citrate; 8: creatine; 9: creatinine; 10: dimethylamine; 11: ethanol; 12: glucose; 13: glutamate; 14: glutamine; 15: glycine; 16: isobutyrate; 17: isoleucine; 18: isopropanol; 19: lactate; 20: lactulose; 21: leucine; 22: lysine; 23: mannitol; 24: methanol; 25: methionine; 26: myo-inositol; 27: N-acetylglutamate; 28: N-acetylneuraminic acid; 29: propylene glycol; 30: pyruvate; 31: raffinose; 32: succinate; 33: taurine; 34: valine.
Metabolites 10 00022 g001
Metabolites 10 00022 g002 550
Figure 2. Results of a linear regression between the measurement of lactulose/mannitol (L/M) ratio by a standard assay and L/M ratio quantified by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
Figure 2. Results of a linear regression between the measurement of lactulose/mannitol (L/M) ratio by a standard assay and L/M ratio quantified by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
Metabolites 10 00022 g002
Metabolites 10 00022 g003 550
Figure 3. Results of partial least squares (PLS) regression models between the quantified NMR spectra (X-variables) and L/M ratio by enzymatic assay (y-variable). (a,b): Plasma metabolites and (c,d): Urine metabolites. For the plasma metabolites, the PLS model was obtained by one component, validated by leave-one-out method (R2 = 0.75, Q2 = 0.50 and root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV) = 6.2 × 10−3). (a) plasma predicted versus quantified L/M, (b) plasma corresponding variable importance in projection (VIP) score plot, providing an estimation of the importance of each metabolite in PLS. A variable with a VIP score greater than 1 (dashed line) is considered important. For the urine metabolites, the PLS model was obtained by two components, validated by leave-one-out method (R2 = 0.73, Q2 = 0.51 and RMSECV = 6.2 × 10−3). (c) urine predicted versus quantified L/M, (d) urine VIP score plot.
Figure 3. Results of partial least squares (PLS) regression models between the quantified NMR spectra (X-variables) and L/M ratio by enzymatic assay (y-variable). (a,b): Plasma metabolites and (c,d): Urine metabolites. For the plasma metabolites, the PLS model was obtained by one component, validated by leave-one-out method (R2 = 0.75, Q2 = 0.50 and root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV) = 6.2 × 10−3). (a) plasma predicted versus quantified L/M, (b) plasma corresponding variable importance in projection (VIP) score plot, providing an estimation of the importance of each metabolite in PLS. A variable with a VIP score greater than 1 (dashed line) is considered important. For the urine metabolites, the PLS model was obtained by two components, validated by leave-one-out method (R2 = 0.73, Q2 = 0.51 and RMSECV = 6.2 × 10−3). (c) urine predicted versus quantified L/M, (d) urine VIP score plot.
Metabolites 10 00022 g003
Metabolites 10 00022 g004 550
Figure 4. Heat map of correlation analysis between the quantified plasma and urine metabolites and quantified urine L/M ratio by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Stars indicate significant correlations (p < 0.05). The heat map is colored based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). The red and blue color of every cell illustrates the Pearson’s correlation coefficient value, while deeper colors indicate higher positive (red) or negative (blue) correlation coefficients.
Figure 4. Heat map of correlation analysis between the quantified plasma and urine metabolites and quantified urine L/M ratio by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Stars indicate significant correlations (p < 0.05). The heat map is colored based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). The red and blue color of every cell illustrates the Pearson’s correlation coefficient value, while deeper colors indicate higher positive (red) or negative (blue) correlation coefficients.
Metabolites 10 00022 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alinaghi, M.; Nguyen, D.N.; Sangild, P.T.; Bertram, H.C. Direct Implementation of Intestinal Permeability Test in NMR Metabolomics for Simultaneous Biomarker Discovery—A Feasibility Study in a Preterm Piglet Model. Metabolites 2020, 10, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10010022

AMA Style

Alinaghi M, Nguyen DN, Sangild PT, Bertram HC. Direct Implementation of Intestinal Permeability Test in NMR Metabolomics for Simultaneous Biomarker Discovery—A Feasibility Study in a Preterm Piglet Model. Metabolites. 2020; 10(1):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10010022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alinaghi, Masoumeh, Duc Ninh Nguyen, Per Torp Sangild, and Hanne Christine Bertram. 2020. "Direct Implementation of Intestinal Permeability Test in NMR Metabolomics for Simultaneous Biomarker Discovery—A Feasibility Study in a Preterm Piglet Model" Metabolites 10, no. 1: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10010022

APA Style

Alinaghi, M., Nguyen, D. N., Sangild, P. T., & Bertram, H. C. (2020). Direct Implementation of Intestinal Permeability Test in NMR Metabolomics for Simultaneous Biomarker Discovery—A Feasibility Study in a Preterm Piglet Model. Metabolites, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10010022

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop