Deep Learning-Based Optical Camera Communication with a 2D MIMO-OOK Scheme for IoT Networks
Abstract
1. Introduction
- Safety: Unlike RF waves, visible light waves do not pose health risks to humans [5]. The RF waveform, however, can have harmful effects and may also cause system performance issues due to electromagnetic interference.
- Higher bandwidth: the bandwidth of the light waveform is over 1000 times greater than that of RF, making it more efficient for data transmission.
- Secure and efficient transmission: visible light waves offer high safety and more efficient communication.
2. Contributions
- Compatibility with Various Camera Types: the system supports most commercial cameras existing on the market by appropriately adjusting the exposure time.
- Rotation Support: The scheme ensures full 360-degree rotation support by applying a matrix transpose. By anchor positioning the four corners of the LED matrix, cameras can accurately distinguish and process rotation.
- Frame Rate Variation Handling and Data Merging Algorithm: Frame rate variation is a significant challenge in OCC systems, often leading to packet loss during data decoding at the receiver. While many people assume that a camera’s labeled frame rate (e.g., 30 fps or 60 fps) remains non-changeable, fluctuations can cause synchronization issues between the transmitter and receiver. The system embeds a sequence number (SN) in each sub-packet, which indicates the sequence within the data stream. By adjusting the SN length according to the data packet size, the OCC system can be optimized.
- Missing Packet Detection: To efficiently reconstruct images from consecutive packet transmissions, the system employs an SN within each packet. By comparing SNs across successive images, the receiver can easily identify and compensate for most missing packets.
- Multiple Link Process: By applying deep learning, we can process multiple users at the same time with high speed and over a long distance. With deep learning for object detection and data decoding, we can achieve very good performances (data rate: 15.360 kbps, distance up to 25 m, and 20 links considering a mobile environment).
3. System Architecture
3.1. Anchor Detection
3.2. Start of Frame Addition
4. Implementation Results
4.1. SNR Measurement
4.2. 2D MIMO-OOK Technology
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Elijah, O.; Rahman, T.A.; Orikumhi, I.; Leow, C.Y.; Hindia, M.N. An overview of IoT and data analytics in agriculture: Benefits and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 5, 3758–3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wazid, M.; Das, A.K.; Odelu, V.; Kumar, N.; Conti, M.; Jo, M. Design of secure user authenticated key management protocol for generic IoT networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 5, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Lee, J.K.; Kim, H.G.; Kim, K.B.; Kim, H.R. Possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on central nerve system. Biomol. Ther. 2019, 27, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.; Utama, I.B.K.Y.; Jang, Y.M. Enabling Technologies and New Challenges in IEEE 802.15.7 Optical Camera Communications Standard. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2024, 62, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikola, S.; Volker, J.; Yeong Min, J.; John, L.Q. An Overview on High-Speed Optical Wireless/Light Communications. Available online: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/17/11-17-0962-02-00lc-an-overviewon-high-speed-optical-wireless-light-communications.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2019).
- IEEE-SA. IEEE Std 802.15.7-2011; IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Part 15.7: Short-Range Wireless Optical Communication Using Visible Light. IEEE-SA: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2011.
- IEEE-SA. IEEE Std 802.15.7-2018; IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks--Part 15.7: Short-Range Optical Wireless Communications. IEEE-SA: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018.
- Pathak, P.H.; Feng, X.; Hu, P.; Mohapatra, P. Visible light communication, networking, and sensing: A survey, potential and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2015, 17, 2047–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Xu, K.; Xu, N.; Li, W. Electromagnetic Interference Diagnosis of RF Circuits Based on Near Field Scanning. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 7th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (ISEMC), Hangzhou, China, 20–23 October 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, K.S.; Hinberg, I.; Wadhwani, J. Electromagnetic interference in medical devices: Health Canada’s past current perspectives and activities. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium Electromagnetic Compatibility, Montreal, QC, Canada, 13–17 August 2001; pp. 1283–1284. [Google Scholar]
- Ong, Z.; Rachim, V.P.; Chung, W.Y. Novel electromagnetic-interference-free indoor environment monitoring system by mobile camera-image-sensor-based VLC. IEEE Photonics J. 2017, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haas, H.; Yin, L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C. What is LiFi? J. Lightwave Technol. 2015, 34, 1533–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zong, B. Pulse position and shape modulation for visible light communication system. In Proceedings of the International Conferences Electromagnetics Advanced Application, Palm Beach, FL, USA, 3–8 August 2014; pp. 546–549. [Google Scholar]
- Videv, S.; Haas, H. Practical space shift keying VLC system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communication Networking Conferences, Istanbul, Turkey, 6–9 April 2014; pp. 405–409. [Google Scholar]
- Deng, P.; Kavehrad, M. Real-time software-defined single-carrier QAM MIMO visible light communication system. In Proceedings of the Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance (ICNS), Herndon, VA, USA, 19–21 April 2016; pp. 5A3-1–5A3-11. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, H.B.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Y.J.; Zhang, J.K.; Yang, X. Optimal constellation design for Indoor MIMO visible light communications. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2016, 20, 264–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.; Jang, Y.M. Experimental Demonstration of Deep Learning-Based HS2PSK-OFDM Scheme for Optical Camera Communication. ICT Express 2025, 2405–9595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.; Jang, Y.M. Survey of next-generation optical wireless communication technologies for 6G and Beyond 6G. ICT Express 2025, 11, 576–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayyash, M.; Elgala, H.; Khreishah, A.; Jungnickel, V.; Little, T.; Shao, S.; Rahaim, M.; Schulz, D.; Hilt, J.; Freund, R. Coexistence of WiFi and LiFi toward 5G: Concepts, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2016, 54, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.; Tran, D.H.; Jang, Y.M. Design and Implementation of Deep Learning for MIMO C-OOK Scheme-based Optical Camera Communication. In Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju Island, Korea, October 2022; pp. 1905–1908. [Google Scholar]
- IEEE Std 802.15.7a-2024; IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Part 15.7: Short-Range Optical Wireless Communications Amendment 1: Higher Rate, Longer Range Optical Camera Communication (OCC). IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2024.
- Nguyen, H.; Jang, Y.M. Design and Implementation of Rolling Shutter MIMO-OFDM scheme for Optical Camera Communication System. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju Island, Korea, 20–22 October 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, W.; Tian, P.; Xu, Z. Design and implementation of a real-time CIM-MIMO optical camera communication system. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 24567–24579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teli, S.R.; Matus, V.; Zvanovec, S.; Perez-Jimenez, R.; Vitek, S.; Ghassemlooy, Z. Optical camera communications for IoT–rolling-shutter based MIMO scheme with grouped LED array transmitter. Sensors 2020, 20, 3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, H.; Kim, S.-M. Experimental Demonstration of 3 × 3 MIMO LED-to-LED Communication Using RGB Colors. Sensors 2021, 21, 4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teli, S.R.; Zvanovec, S.; Perez-Jimenez, R.; Ghassemlooy, Z. Spatial frequency-based angular behavior of a short-range flicker-free MIMO–OCC link. Appl. Opt. 2020, 59, 10357–10368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, H.; Si, J.; Abousleman, G.P. Region-of-interest detection and its application to image segmentation and compression. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, Waltham, MA, USA, 30 April–3 May 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, G.-S.; Tuan, N.-M.; Chen, W.-J. Detecting region of interest for cadastral images in Taiwan. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2017, 76, 25369–25389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, G.-S.; Tu, J.-C.; Lin, J.-Y. Keyword Detection Based on RetinaNet and Transfer Learning for Personal Information Protection in Document Images. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Yang, P.; Zhang, N.; Hou, J. Edge-Assisted Lightweight Region-of-Interest Extraction and Transmission for Vehicle Perception. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 4–8 December 2023; pp. 1054–1059. [Google Scholar]
- He, L.-H.; Zhou, Y.-Z.; Liu, L.; Cao, W.; Ma, J.-H. Research on object detection and recognition in remote sensing images based on YOLOv11. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Wu, A.; Fu, Q. MAS-YOLOv11: An Improved Underwater Object Detection Algorithm Based on YOLOv11. Sensors 2025, 25, 3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuo, S.; Bai, H.; Jiang, L.; Zhou, X.; Duan, X.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, Z. SCL-YOLOv11: A Lightweight Object Detection Network for Low-Illumination Environments. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 47653–47662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.; Li, L.; Xiao, H.; Xu, F.; Shan, B.; Yin, H. YOLO-MECD: Citrus Detection Algorithm Based on YOLOv11. Agronomy 2025, 15, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkhateeb, A.; Jiang, S.; Charan, G. Real-Time Digital Twins: Vision and Research Directions for 6G and Beyond. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2023, 61, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Bai, L.; Sun, M.; Cheng, X. A LiDAR-Aided Channel Model for Vehicular Intelligent Sensing-Communication Integration. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2024, 25, 20105–20119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Transmitter | ||
LED types | 8 × 8 | 16 × 16 |
FEC | Reed Solomon (15,11) | |
Receiver | ||
Camera | PointGrey camera | |
Frame Rate | 60 fps | |
Data Rate (kbps) | ||
Uncode bit rate | 3.840 | 15.360 |
Code bit rate | 2.816 | 11.264 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nguyen, H.; Jang, Y.M. Deep Learning-Based Optical Camera Communication with a 2D MIMO-OOK Scheme for IoT Networks. Electronics 2025, 14, 3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14153011
Nguyen H, Jang YM. Deep Learning-Based Optical Camera Communication with a 2D MIMO-OOK Scheme for IoT Networks. Electronics. 2025; 14(15):3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14153011
Chicago/Turabian StyleNguyen, Huy, and Yeng Min Jang. 2025. "Deep Learning-Based Optical Camera Communication with a 2D MIMO-OOK Scheme for IoT Networks" Electronics 14, no. 15: 3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14153011
APA StyleNguyen, H., & Jang, Y. M. (2025). Deep Learning-Based Optical Camera Communication with a 2D MIMO-OOK Scheme for IoT Networks. Electronics, 14(15), 3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14153011