Next Article in Journal
Antibiotic Cocktail Effects on Intestinal Microbial Community, Barrier Function, and Immune Function in Early Broiler Chickens
Previous Article in Journal
The Ongoing Debate on the Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Acute Pancreatitis—Is There a Conclusion? A Comprehensive Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Lungu et al. Molecular Characterisation of Antimicrobial Resistance in E. coli Isolates from Piglets in the West Region of Romania. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1544

by
Bianca Cornelia Lungu
1,†,
Ioan Hutu
1,*,† and
Paul Andrew Barrow
1,2,*
1
Horia Cernescu Research Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences King Michael I, Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timisoara, Romania
2
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Daphne Jackson Rd., Guildford, Surrey GU2 7AL, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2024, 13(5), 412; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050412
Submission received: 12 April 2024 / Accepted: 24 April 2024 / Published: 30 April 2024
The authors Bianca Cornelia Lungu and Ioan Hutu did not state contributed equally. The corrected Author Contributions statement appears here. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication [1] has also been updated.
Bianca Cornelia Lungu 1,†, Ioan Hutu 1,*,† and Paul Andrew Barrow 1,2,*
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Text Correction

There was an error in the original publication. Some ratios from paragraphs Section 2.2 and Section 2.3 were calculated incorrectly.
A correction has been made to content in Section 2.2 and Section 2.3.

2.2. Prevalence of Resistance Genes

The prevalence of the resistance genes ampC, blaZ, blaTEM and tetK against the tested antibiotics, detected in susceptible and resistant isolates, are presented in Table 2 [1]. The prevalence of resistance genes (RG+ and SG+) in resistant (R) and susceptible (S) isolates, the penetrance of the genes (P%) and diagnostic odds ratios of positive phenotypic resistance (DOR) for E. coli in growing pigs are shown. They show that 62.8% (470/748) of the 76 isolates tested for 13 antibiotics and possessing the ampC, blaZ, blaTEM and tetK genes (RG+) actually showed the resistant phenotype (R) in AST identified using MicroScan Walk Away. More importantly, 61.3% (426/695) of the isolates possessing the genes studied (SG+) actually showed the susceptible phenotype (S) in AST. The genes studied were possessed by 62.1% (896/1443) of R&S isolates. Only 37.2% (278/748) of isolates did not possess the genes studied (RG−) in the AST resistant phenotype (R) and 38.7% (269/695) of isolates did not possess the genes studied (SG−) in the susceptible phenotype (S). Some isolates showed the multi-resistance genes ampC and blaTEM (resistance to cefazolin, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, cefuroxime) and other isolates showed multi-resistance genes ampC, blaZ and blaTEM (resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanate and ampicillin).

2.3. Microbiological Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AST) by Resistance Genes

The prevalence of resistance genes for phenotypic resistance and their susceptibility to the antibiotics tested are presented in Table 3. The prevalence of ampC was 97.0%, for blaZ it was 96.0%, for blaTEM 32.9% and for tetK 59.3%.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Lungu, B.C.; Hutu, I.; Barrow, P.A. Molecular Characterisation of Antimicrobial Resistance in E. coli Isolates from Piglets in the West Region of Romania. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lungu, B.C.; Hutu, I.; Barrow, P.A. Correction: Lungu et al. Molecular Characterisation of Antimicrobial Resistance in E. coli Isolates from Piglets in the West Region of Romania. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1544. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 412. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050412

AMA Style

Lungu BC, Hutu I, Barrow PA. Correction: Lungu et al. Molecular Characterisation of Antimicrobial Resistance in E. coli Isolates from Piglets in the West Region of Romania. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1544. Antibiotics. 2024; 13(5):412. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050412

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lungu, Bianca Cornelia, Ioan Hutu, and Paul Andrew Barrow. 2024. "Correction: Lungu et al. Molecular Characterisation of Antimicrobial Resistance in E. coli Isolates from Piglets in the West Region of Romania. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1544" Antibiotics 13, no. 5: 412. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050412

APA Style

Lungu, B. C., Hutu, I., & Barrow, P. A. (2024). Correction: Lungu et al. Molecular Characterisation of Antimicrobial Resistance in E. coli Isolates from Piglets in the West Region of Romania. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1544. Antibiotics, 13(5), 412. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050412

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop