Next Article in Journal
Retrospective Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Ceftriaxone 1 g Twice Daily versus 2 g Once Daily for Treatment of Aspiration Pneumonia
Previous Article in Journal
Early Life Antimicrobial Exposure: Impact on Clostridioides difficile Colonization in Infants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Concentration-Dependent Activity of Pazufloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An In Vivo Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study

1
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan
2
Department of Clinical Pharmacotherapy, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(7), 982; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070982
Submission received: 28 June 2022 / Revised: 15 July 2022 / Accepted: 19 July 2022 / Published: 21 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Antibiotic Therapy in Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
The bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa is known to be associated with nosocomial infections around the world. Pazufloxacin, a potent DNA gyrase inhibitor, is known to be an effective drug candidate. However, it has not been clarified whether the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) of pazufloxacin was effective against P. aeruginosa. Herein, we demonstrated that the PK/PD index of pazufloxacin against P. aeruginosa infection is used to optimize the dosing regiments. We constructed an in vivo infection model by infecting P. aeruginosa into the thigh of a mouse to determine the PD, and we measured the serum concentration of pazufloxacin to construct the PK model using high-performance liquid chromatography. The therapeutic efficacy of pazufloxacin was correlated with the ratio of the area under the free concentration time curve at 24 h to the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC24/MIC), and the maximum free concentration to the MIC (fCmax/MIC). Each contribution rate (R2) was 0.72 and 0.65, respectively, whereas the time at which the free drug concentration remained above the MIC (R2 = 0.28). The target value of pazufloxacin fAUC24/MIC for stasis was 46.1, for 1 log10 it was 63.8, and for 2 log10 it was 100.8. Moreover, fCmax/MIC for stasis was 5.5, for 1 log10 it was 7.1, and for 2 log10 it was 10.8. We demonstrated that the in vivo concentration-dependent activity of pazufloxacin was effective against the P. aeruginosa infection, and successfully made the PK/PD model sufficiently bactericidal. The PK/PD model will be beneficial in preventing the spread of nosocomial infections.

1. Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is known to be related to hospital-acquired infections such as urinary tract, pneumonia, surgical site, and bloodstream infections [1,2]. The first-line antibiotic therapy typically used against P. aeruginosa is carbapenems, but the frequency of carbapenem-resistant strains has been steadily increasing, leading to their increased use [3,4] and the need for alternative treatments. Pazufloxacin is a well-known DNA gyrase inhibitor which demonstrates potent activity against P. aeruginosa strains in vitro and effectiveness against the P. aeruginosa infection [5,6]. As pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses have demonstrated effectiveness for optimizing dosage regimens, and thereby improving outcomes [7], they have received increasing attention. There are a few papers that calculated the PK/PD parameters for fluoroquinolones using a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model. Liu et al. reported that the target value of enrofloxacin AUC24/MIC for stasis was 7.8, for 1 log10 it was 10.5, and for 2 log10 it was 15.1 [8]. Andes et al. reported that the target value of gatifloxacin AUC24/MIC for stasis was 41.2, for 1 log10 it was 72.2, and for 2 log10 it was 126 [9]. Zhou et al. reported that the target value of antofloxacin fAUC24/MIC for stasis was 38.7, for 1 log10 it was 66.1, and for 2 log10 it was 147 [10]. The target value may vary among fluoroquinolones. Furthermore, we have shown that the target time above the MIC value differs among cephems [11,12]. Tebipenem has been shown to correlate with AUC/MIC and Cmax/MIC better than the time above MIC, despite the use of carbapenems [13]. Thus, we believe that the target value should be indicated for each drug.
However, a PK/PD analysis of pazufloxacin against the P. aeruginosa infection has not been conducted, even though it is essential for the optimization regarding dosing regimens. Herein, we evaluated the effectiveness of pazufloxacin in vivo and demonstrated the PK/PD index against P. aeruginosa.

2. Results

2.1. Susceptibility Testing of Pazufloxacin

The MIC of pazufloxacin is based on our examination against P. aeruginosa, where ATCC 27853 was 0.5 µg/mL.

2.2. PK of Pazufloxacin

Figure 1 shows the serum concentrations in the infected neutropenic mice that were administrated pazufloxacin of 2.5, 10, and 40 mg/kg, while Table 1 summarizes the serum PK parameters. The Cmax ranged from 0.63 to 10.03 µg/mL and the AUC0–∞ from 1.35 to 21.6 µg∙h/mL. The Cmax and AUC0–∞ showed a linear relationship with the dose of pazufloxacin (data not shown). The mean PK values for these three doses were 0.96 ± 0.25 h–1, 2.40 ± 0.55 h–1, and 0.84 ± 0.12 L/kg, respectively, and the %PB of pazufloxacin was 20.25 ± 3.88%.

2.3. Association between Antibacterial Effects and PK/PD Indices

The bacterial loads of the thigh-infected animals 2 h after inoculation and the untreated control mice were 4.43 ± 0.18 log10 and 8.82 ± 0.13 log10 CFU/thigh, respectively. The highest examined doses reduced the bacterial burden to 2.50 ± 0.53 log10 CFU/thigh. Figure 2 shows the associations between each of the PK/PD indices and the antibacterial effects for P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853. In regards to the PK/PD indices for pazufloxacin, stronger correlations were observed between the therapeutic efficacy of pazufloxacin and fAUC24/MIC (R2 = 0.72) and fCmax/MIC (R2 = 0.65) compared with fT > MIC (R2 = 0.28). Table 2 shows the PK/PD model parameter estimated for the fAUC24/MIC and fCmax/MIC indices for pazufloxacin against P. aeruginosa.

2.4. Target PK/PD Index in Relation to Efficacy

Based on these results, we summarized the target values of fAUC24/MIC and fCmax /MIC required for stasis, 1 log10 and 2 log10 reductions in the bacterial burden in Table 3. As a result, the target values of fAUC24/MIC and fCmax /MIC for a 2 log10 kill were required to be two times higher compared to the static effect.

3. Discussion

The purpose of this study was to reveal the PK/PD parameters of pazufloxacin, which has exhibited direct antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa as a potent inhibitor of DNA gyrase and bactericidal activity against P. aeruginosa in in vitro experiments [14].
To predict the clinical efficacy in the PK/PD analyses, the use of a murine infection model, which was established by Craig et al. [15], has become a standard method that is frequently used to optimize doses of antimicrobial agents in clinical trials. The results showed that in neutropenic mice, nonlinearity was a feature of the unbound PK of pazufloxacin. This PK nonlinearity was seen in various dose ranges of pazufloxacin required to fully characterize the PK/PD relationship. Although the number of samples and sampling points used in the PK analysis were 3 and 4, respectively, the PK parameters (Vd = 0.84 L/kg, ke = 2.40 h–1 and CL = 2.0 L/h) were consistent with the report by Fukuda et al. [16]. Thus, the PK parameters obtained in this study were considered reasonable. To develop free plasma concentrations for multiple dosing patterns throughout the 24 h treatment period, we applied the superposition principle to the single-dose unbound plasma pazufloxacin concentration time curves. As a result, based on the R2 values and a visual examination of the fit, the fAUC24/MIC and fCmax/MIC ratios in the thigh infection models were more suitable to predict the in vivo bacterial killing than the fT > MIC (Figure 2). Previously, the time course of bacterial activity was investigated using the time–kill curve experiment [17]. In the present study, two major bactericidal activity patterns of time- and concentration-dependent killing were observed in the drug concentrations. As concentration-dependent killing has been observed over various concentrations with aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, the bactericidal activity pattern of pazufloxacin, which is referred to as concentration-dependent killing, was similar to that of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones in the in vitro experiments, as shown in Figure 2. Similar results were observed between these antimicrobial agents in the model mouse using a pazufloxacin-susceptible P. aeruginosa isolate when the pazufloxacin dosage exceeded the MIC, similar to that of aminoglycosides; this finding verifies the concentration-dependent efficacy of this antimicrobial agent [16]. The most suitable PK/PD parameter for fluoroquinolones in animal models is the AUC24/MIC or Cmax/MIC ratio [8,9,10]. In our study, the fAUC24/MIC and fCmax/MIC ratio required for a static effect and maximum killing of the P. aeruginosa thigh infection were estimated to be approximately 46.1 and 5.5 and 100.8 and 10.8, respectively (Table 3). The mean Cmax or AUC24 of a single administration of 1000 mg pazufloxacin reported 18.06 mg/L or 58.6 mg∙h/L, respectively [18]. Nakamura K. et al. reported that the Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated that 1000 mg of pazufloxacin administered every 12 h (2000 mg daily) can achieve >90% probability of the target attainment in a patient with prostatic hypertrophy with MIC = 2 mg/L [19]. They reported that a prostatic penetration of pazufloxacin (prostate tissue/plasma ratio) was good at Cmax (0.82–0.99) and AUC0–1.5 (0.80–0.98). In general, tissue penetration of fluoroquinolone antibiotics (e.g., pazufloxacin) were good, and unbound concentrations of pazufloxacin in the tissue’s interstitial fluids are similar to those in plasma [20]. Therefore, we expected that our demonstrated data will improve clinical outcomes in patients with P. aeruginosa infections. In this study, we clarified the PK/PD parameters of PZFX against P. aeruginosa. However, only one strain was used; therefore, further experiments using other strains or clinical isolates is desirable. In addition, the validation of the PK/PD parameters for other Gram-negative bacteria has not been validated, so further investigation is needed.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

P. aeruginosa was purchased from ATCC (ATCC 27853; ATCC, Rockford, MD, USA). Sheep blood agar was purchased from Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Pazufloxacin mesilate was purchased from Taisyo Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).

4.2. Susceptibility Test of Pazufloxacin

We determined the MIC of P. aeruginosa for pazufloxacin according to the recommended standardized procedure [21]. P. aeruginosa was cultivated onto sheep blood agar at 37 °C before each experiment. We serially diluted the P. aeruginosa suspension (1.5 × 106 CFU/mL) tenfold with MHB, and then plated 50 µL of each diluent onto Mueller–Hinton agar plates with or without pazufloxacin (Taisyo Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in each concentration (0.12, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, or 1 µg/mL) [22], and the MIC of ATCC 27853 was evaluated after 16–20 h.

4.3. In Vivo Study

The animal study was preceded by approval from the Kagoshima University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (approval No.: MD12106). The development of the neutropenia and thigh infection model mouse was performed according to the previous report [23,24]. Briefly, we intraperitoneally administrated 150 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide for 4 days into ddY female mice (5 weeks old) following administration of 100 mg/kg for 1 day to induce a “neutropenic condition model” before the experimental infection. Next, before bacterial inoculation, the mice were anesthetized with a mixture of medetomidine (0.3 mg/kg), midazolam (4.0 mg/kg), and butorphanol (5.0 mg/kg) [25]. We injected a bacterial suspension from an early logarithmic phase into a posterior thigh (6 × 104 CFU/mL, 100 µL/thigh). Two hours after the bacterial inoculation, the infection had been reproducibly established.

4.4. Serum Concentration of Pazufloxacin

A total of 2.5, 10, and 40 mg/kg of pazufloxacin was subcutaneously administrated to conduct single-dose serum PK analyses in the neutropenic mice. After that, serum samples were obtained at 10, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after administration. The serum concentration of pazufloxacin was measured using HPLC with a slightly modified previous method [26]. The validation parameters of the chromatography method are indicated in Supplementary Table S1.

4.5. Serum Protein Binding of Pazufloxacin

We determined the protein-binding activity using centrifugal filter units as follows [27]. In the first, the serum samples were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C after samples were centrifuged at 2000× g for 10 min at 37 °C. The supernatants were filtrated with a 0.2 µm ultrafilter and the concentration of pazufloxacin wad measured using HPLC. We calculated the protein binding percentage (%PB). The equation was as follows:
%PB = [(Cp − Cpuf)/Cp] × 100
where Cp is the pazufloxacin concentration in serum and Cpuf is the pazufloxacin-free concentration in the ultrafiltrate.

4.6. PD Analyses of Pazufloxacin

Two hours after inoculation with ATCC 27853, pazufloxacin (2.5–35 mg/kg) was injected subcutaneously at intervals of 6, 8, 12, and 24 h in 24 different dosing patterns. We then euthanized the treated mice and removed their thighs 24 h after the start of pazufloxacin administration. Next, we collected thigh samples from the untreated mice and homogenized them in 7 mL of sterile saline to count the number of viable cells at 2 and 26 h after bacterial inoculation. The thigh homogenate was serially diluted tenfold with MHB and spread onto bromothymol blue agar, followed by culturing for 24 h (37 °C). Next, the CFU for each thigh was determined, set at a lower limit of 160 CFU/thigh. The same regimens described above were repeated, except for with 23 different dosing patterns, for the thigh-infected animals. Finally, we euthanized the mice after inoculation.

4.7. PK/PD Analyses of Pazufloxacin

The following PK parameters, such as the absorption rate constant (ka (h–1)), the elimination rate constant (ke (h–1)), the volume of distribution (Vd (L/kg)), and AUC, were calculated based on the drug concentration data, using a standard one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination processes. The pazufloxacin concentration in the serum (Cp (µg/mL)) at the time (t (h)) after dosing (D (mg/kg)) were described as follows:
Cp = D × ka × (e–ke × t − e–ka × t)/Vd (ka − ke)
We then simulated the serum pazufloxacin concentrations based on the mean pharmacokinetic parameters for the four doses to estimate the following three major PK/PD indices: fAUC24/MIC, fCmax/MIC, and fT > MIC.
Then, data regarding the antibacterial activity were fitted to the following model:
E = E0 − (Emax × Xγ)/(EC50γ + Xγ),
where E, E0, and Emax represent the killing effect of the pazufloxacin (log10 CFU of P. aeruginosa per thigh at 24 h), the baseline effect in the absence of the drug, and the maximum killing effect, respectively, where X represents the PK/PD index, EC50 represents the PK/PD index value required for 50% of Emax, and γ represents the Hill coefficient describing the steepness of the sigmoid curve. The MULTI program (originally developed by Yamaoka et al. [28], and currently maintained by the Department of Biopharmaceutics and Drug Metabolism, Kyoto University (Kyoto, Japan)) was used for all PK/PD analyses with nonlinear least-squares regression, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for all statistical analyses.

5. Conclusions

We determined the most predictive PK/PD index of pazufloxacin against P. aeruginosa and the predictive index required for effectiveness. These results would be useful to estimate the optimal dose of pazufloxacin to fight against P. aeruginosa infections.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11070982/s1, Table S1: Accuracy and precision of quantification of PZFX.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.M., K.I. and Y.T.; methodology, K.M., K.I., Y.Y., A.S. and N.M.; software, K.I. and N.M.; validation, Y.U., K.M., K.I., Y.Y., A.S., K.N. and N.M.; formal analysis, Y.U., K.M., K.I., Y.Y., A.S., E.W., K.N., K.U. and N.M.; investigation, Y.U., K.M., K.I., Y.Y., A.S., E.W., K.N., K.U. and N.M.; resources, K.I. and N.M.; data curation, K.M., K.I., Y.Y., Y.E., H.T., N.M. and Y.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.U., K.M., Y.Y., Y.T.; writing—review and editing, K.M., K.I., Y.Y., Y.E., H.T. and Y.T.; visualization, K.M., K.I., Y.Y., Y.E., H.T. and N.M.; supervision, K.M., K.I., N.M. and Y.T.; project administration, Y.U., K.M., K.I., Y.Y., Y.E., A.S., E.W., K.N., K.U., H.T., N.M. and Y.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study was preceded by the approval from the Kagoshima University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (approval No.: MD12106).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stover, C.K.; Pham, X.Q.; Erwin, A.L.; Mizoguchi, S.D.; Warrener, P.; Hickey, M.J.; Brinkman, F.S.L.; Hufnagle, W.O.; Kowallk, D.J.; Lagrou, M.; et al. Complete Genome Sequence of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa PAO1, an Opportunistic Pathogen. Nature 2000, 406, 959–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gaynes, R.; Edwards, J.R. Overview of Nosocomial Infections Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lo, T.S.; Borchardt, S.M.; Welch, J.M.; Rohrich, M.A.; Alonto, A.M.; Alonto, A.V. Doripenem in Hospital Infections: A Focus on Nosocomial Pneumonia, Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections, and Complicated Urinary Tract Infections. Infect. Drug Resist. 2009, 2, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Shigemi, A.; Matsumoto, K.; Yaji, K.; Shimodozono, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Miyanohara, H.; Kawamura, H.; Orita, M.; Tokuda, K.; Nishi, J.; et al. Correlation between Meropenem and Doripenem Use Density and the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 34, 589–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mikamo, H.; Sato, Y.; Hayasaki, Y.; Kawazoe, K.; Tamaya, T. In Vitro Activities of Pazufloxacin, a Novel Injectable Quinolone, against Bacteria Causing Infections in Obstetric and Gynecological Patients. Chemotherapy 1999, 45, 154–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Muratani, T.; Inoue, M.; Mitsuhashi, S. In Vitro Activity of T-3761, a New Fluoroquinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1992, 36, 2293–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Scaglione, F. Can PK/PD Be Used in Everyday Clinical Practice. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2002, 19, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, X.; Yang, Q.; Fan, Y.; Du, Y.; Lei, L.; Wang, D.; Liu, Y. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Enrofloxacin Treatment of Escherichia Coli in a Murine Thigh Infection Modeling. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Andes, D.; Craig, W.A. Pharmacodynamics of the New Fluoroquinolone Gatifloxacin in Murine Thigh and Lung Infection Models. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 1665–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhou, Y.F.; Tao, M.T.; He, Y.Z.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y.H.; Liao, X.P. In Vivo Bioluminescent Monitoring of Therapeutic Efficacy and Pharmacodynamic Target Assessment of Antofloxacin against Escherichia Coli in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Takemura, W.; Tashiro, S.; Hayashi, M.; Igarashi, Y.; Liu, X.; Mizukami, Y.; Kojima, N.; Morita, T.; Enoki, Y.; Taguchi, K.; et al. Cefmetazole as an Alternative to Carbapenems Against Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia Coli Infections Based on In Vitro and In Vivo Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Experiments. Pharm. Res. 2021, 38, 1839–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tashiro, S.; Hayashi, M.; Takemura, W.; Igarashi, Y.; Liu, X.; Mizukami, Y.; Kojima, N.; Enoki, Y.; Taguchi, K.; Yokoyama, Y.; et al. Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Evaluation of Flomoxef against Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia Coli In Vitro and In Vivo in a Murine Thigh Infection Model. Pharm. Res. 2021, 38, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sugano, T.; Yoshida, T.; Yamada, K.; Shimizu, A.; Morita, J.; Kijima, K.; Maebashi, K. Shibasaki.Shigeki Antimicrobial Activity of Tebipenem Pivoxil against Streptococcus Pneumoniae and Haemophilus Influenzae, and Its Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Profile in Mice. Jpn. J. Chemother. 2009, 38–48. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hawkey, P.M. Mechanisms of Quinolone Action and Microbial Response. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Drusano, G.L. Prevention of Resistance: A Goal for Dose Selection for Antimicrobial Agents. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fukuda, Y.; Takahata, M.; Mitsuyama, J.; Minami, S.; Totsuka, K. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Assessment of Puzufloxacin Mesilate in a Systemic Infection with Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in Mice. Jpn. J. Chemother. 2004, 52, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  17. Craig, W.; Ebert, S. Killing and Regrowth of Bacteria in Vitro: A Review. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl. 1990, 74, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, J.; Seong, S.J.; Lim, M.; Park, S.M.; Park, J.; Seo, J.J.; Lee, H.W.; Yoon, Y.-R. Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Dose Proportionality of Intravenous Pazufloxacin Mesilate in Healthy Korean Volunteers. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2012, 8, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nakamura, K.; Ikawa, K.; Nishikawa, G.; Kobayashi, I.; Narushima, M.; Muramatsu, H.; Morinaga, S.; Kajikawa, K.; Kato, Y.; Watanabe, M.; et al. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment of Pazufloxacin in Prostate Tissue: Dosing Considerations for Prostatitis. J. Infect. Chemother. 2017, 23, 809–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Araki, H.; Ogake, N.; Minami, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Narita, H.; Tamai, I.; A, T. Application of Muscle Microdialysis to Evaluate the Concentrations of the Fluoroquinolones Pazufloxacin and Ofloxacin in the Tissue Interstitial Fluids of Rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1997, 49, 1141–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, 8th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2009; Document M07-A8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yokoyama, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Ikawa, K.; Watanabe, E.; Shigemi, A.; Umezaki, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Ueno, K.; Morikawa, N.; Takeda, Y. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Sulbactam against Acinetobacter Baumannii in in Vitro and Murine Thigh and Lung Infection Models. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 43, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dudhani, R.V.; Turnidge, J.D.; Coulthard, K.; Milne, R.W.; Rayner, C.R.; Li, J.; Nation, R.L. Elucidation of the Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Determinant of Colistin Activity against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in Murine Thigh and Lung Infection Models. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Pachón-Ibáñez, M.E.; Docobo-Pérez, F.; López-Rojas, R.; Domínguez-Herrera, J.; Jiménez-Mejias, M.E.; García-Curiel, A.; Pichardo, C.; Jiménez, L.; Pachón, J. Efficacy of Rifampin and Its Combinations with Imipenem, Sulbactam, and Colistin in Experimental Models of Infection Caused by Imipenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1165–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kawai, S.; Takagi, Y.; Kaneko, S.; Kurosawa, T. Effect of Three Types of Mixed Anesthetic Agents Alternate to Ketamine in Mice. Exp. Anim. 2011, 60, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ogino, H.; Kido, K.; Tsuchiya, M.; Kizu, J.; Hori, S. Simple Determination of Fluoroquinolones with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Jpn. J. Chemother. 2005, 53, 619–622. [Google Scholar]
  27. MacMahon, W.; Stallings, J.; Sgoutas, D. A Simple Ultrafiltration Method for Determining Unbound Estradiol in Serum. Clin. Biochem. 1983, 16, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yamaoka, K.; Tanigawara, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Uno, T. A Pharmacokinetic Analysis Program (Multi) for Microcomputer. J. Pharmacobio-Dyn. 1981, 4, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of pazufloxacin after single subcutaneous administration in infected neutropenic mice. Simulation time-concentration curves were created following parameters. Vd = 0.84 L/kg, ke = 2.40 h–1, and ka = 0.96 h–1. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3).
Figure 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of pazufloxacin after single subcutaneous administration in infected neutropenic mice. Simulation time-concentration curves were created following parameters. Vd = 0.84 L/kg, ke = 2.40 h–1, and ka = 0.96 h–1. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3).
Antibiotics 11 00982 g001
Figure 2. Relationships between the change in log10 CFU/thigh at 24 h and PK/PD indices. (a) fAUC24/MIC, (b) fCmax/MIC, and (c) fT > MIC for P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853. The horizontal dashed lines: organism burden at the start of therapy. Plot: mean for one thigh per mouse. R2: coefficient of determination.
Figure 2. Relationships between the change in log10 CFU/thigh at 24 h and PK/PD indices. (a) fAUC24/MIC, (b) fCmax/MIC, and (c) fT > MIC for P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853. The horizontal dashed lines: organism burden at the start of therapy. Plot: mean for one thigh per mouse. R2: coefficient of determination.
Antibiotics 11 00982 g002
Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of pazufloxacin after single subcutaneous doses of 2.5, 10 and 40 mg/kg.
Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of pazufloxacin after single subcutaneous doses of 2.5, 10 and 40 mg/kg.
Dosing Regimen (mg/kg)Cmax (µg/mL)AUC0– (µg∙h/mL)
2.50.631.35
102.515.40
4010.0321.6
Cmax, maximum drug concentration; AUC0, area under the drug concentration–time curve from zero to infinity.
Table 2. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model parameter estimates predicting viable counts at 24 h for the fAUC24/MIC and fCmax/MIC index of pazufloxacin against P. aeruginosa in the thigh infection models.
Table 2. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model parameter estimates predicting viable counts at 24 h for the fAUC24/MIC and fCmax/MIC index of pazufloxacin against P. aeruginosa in the thigh infection models.
Emax (log10 CFU/Thigh)E0 (log10 CFU/Thigh)EC50γ
fAUC24/MIC6.563.6441.42.04
fCmax/MIC6.183.605.542.90
fAUC24/MIC, the ratio of the area under the free concentration–time curve for a 24 h period to the minimum inhibitory concentration; fCmax/MIC, the ratio of the maximum free concentration to the minimum inhibitory concentration; Emax, maximum killing effect; E0, baseline effect in the absence of the drug; EC50, PK/PD index value needed for 50% of Emax; γ, Hill coefficient.
Table 3. Target values of pazufloxacin fAUC24/MIC and fCmax/MIC for a static effect and 1, and 2 log10 kill against P. aeruginosa in the thigh infection models.
Table 3. Target values of pazufloxacin fAUC24/MIC and fCmax/MIC for a static effect and 1, and 2 log10 kill against P. aeruginosa in the thigh infection models.
fAUC24/MICfCmax/MIC
static effect46.15.5
1 log10 kill63.87.1
2 log10 kill100.810.8
fAUC24/MIC, the ratio of the area under the free concentration–time curve for a 24 h period to the minimum inhibitory concentration; fCmax/MIC, the ratio of the maximum free concentration to the minimum inhibitory concentration.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Umezaki, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Ikawa, K.; Yokoyama, Y.; Enoki, Y.; Shigemi, A.; Watanabe, E.; Nakamura, K.; Ueno, K.; Terazono, H.; et al. Concentration-Dependent Activity of Pazufloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An In Vivo Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070982

AMA Style

Umezaki Y, Matsumoto K, Ikawa K, Yokoyama Y, Enoki Y, Shigemi A, Watanabe E, Nakamura K, Ueno K, Terazono H, et al. Concentration-Dependent Activity of Pazufloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An In Vivo Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(7):982. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070982

Chicago/Turabian Style

Umezaki, Yasuhiro, Kazuaki Matsumoto, Kazuro Ikawa, Yuta Yokoyama, Yuki Enoki, Akari Shigemi, Erika Watanabe, Koyo Nakamura, Keiichiro Ueno, Hideyuki Terazono, and et al. 2022. "Concentration-Dependent Activity of Pazufloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An In Vivo Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study" Antibiotics 11, no. 7: 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070982

APA Style

Umezaki, Y., Matsumoto, K., Ikawa, K., Yokoyama, Y., Enoki, Y., Shigemi, A., Watanabe, E., Nakamura, K., Ueno, K., Terazono, H., Morikawa, N., & Takeda, Y. (2022). Concentration-Dependent Activity of Pazufloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An In Vivo Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study. Antibiotics, 11(7), 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070982

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop