Next Article in Journal
Lighting Candles in the Darkness: An Exploration of Commemorative Acts with British Teenagers at the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum
Previous Article in Journal
Spirituality and Health in Brazil: A Survey Snapshot of Research Groups
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spiritual Decline as a Predictor of Posttraumatic Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Religions
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/rel12010028
religions-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Religiosity and Depression at Midlife: A Prospective Study

by
Micheline R. Anderson
1,
Priya Wickramaratne
2,3,4,*,
Connie Svob
2,3 and
Lisa Miller
1
1
Spirituality Mind Body Institute, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
2
Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
3
Division of Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA
4
Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Religions 2021, 12(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010028
Submission received: 12 October 2020 / Revised: 22 December 2020 / Accepted: 24 December 2020 / Published: 31 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spiritual Development over the Lifespan)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Objectives: Previously, authors found high personal importance of religion/spirituality (R/S) in early adulthood to predict a 75% decreased risk of recurrence of major depression in middle adulthood. Here, the authors follow up the original study sample to examine the association between R/S and major depression from middle adulthood into midlife. Method: Participants were 79 of 114 original adult offspring of depressed and non-depressed parents. Using logistic regression analysis, three measures of R/S from middle adulthood (personal importance, frequency of religious service attendance, and denomination) were used to predict Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in midlife. Results: High R/S importance in middle adulthood was prospectively associated with risk for an initial onset of depression during the period of midlife. Frequency of attendance in middle adulthood was associated with recurrence of depression at midlife in the high-risk group for depression, as compared to the low-risk group. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the relation between R/S and depression may vary across adult development, with risk for depression associated with R/S at midlife potentially revealing a developmental process.

1. Introduction

In the past two decades, inquiries into the association between religiosity and spirituality (R/S) and mental health have provided evidence for substantial salutary effects of R/S on physical and mental health (Koenig et al. 2012). Although conflicting reports do exist (Maselko and Buka 2008; Pargament et al. 2004; Lawrence et al. 2016; Braam et al. 2007), this positive association is often confounded within retrospective or cross-sectional data as a result of individuals with psychiatric symptoms seeking out religion as a means of coping. Despite these findings, a substantial body of literature supports an inverse association between R/S and depression that remains consistent across a myriad of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (for review, see Sharma et al. 2017; Bonelli et al. 2012; Koenig 2012a).
Reviews and meta-analyses of the literature examining this relation suggest that the majority of prospective cohort studies associated R/S with lower levels of depression or faster remission from depression, with an average effect size of the protective benefit of R/S against depression of −0.18 (Braam and Koenig 2019; Smith et al. 2003). Although relatively small, Koenig (2012a) compares this benefit to the magnitude of risk conferred by gender on depressive symptoms. Attempts to disentangle the salutogenic and depressogenic mechanisms of R/S have been largely aimed at cognitive and behavioral mechanism such as beliefs or coping strategies (positive or negative) that either aid in or deter from navigating ecological challenges. In this regard, this study and its most recent predecessor (Miller et al. 2012) establish temporality as a means to clarify the relationship between R/S and onset or recurrence of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in an intergenerational sample during distinct developmental periods, such as midlife.
Across this substantial body of literature, there exists little research on the stability of or change in the relationship between R/S and depression across the lifespan. The current report is part of a larger 30 year longitudinal study (Weissman et al. 2016a, 2016b) to investigate the trajectory of the relationship between R/S and MDD across the course of development, focusing here on midlife. Previously, the association between R/S and depression was assessed cross sectionally at early adulthood (mean age at assessment of MDD = 26, Miller et al. 1997) and prospectively from early adulthood through the child-rearing years of middle adulthood (mean age at assessment of MDD = 37, Miller et al. 2012) of this ongoing 30 year study of families at high and low risk for depression (Weissman et al. 2016a). In both reports on R/S, importance of R/S offered protective benefits against MDD, putting those with self-reported high importance of R/S at one-tenth and one-fourth the risk for MDD in early adulthood and child-rearing years of middle adulthood, respectively. From a lifespan perspective, it has been argued that the association between R/S and depression is of particular relevance during vulnerable developmental periods (i.e., adolescence and older adulthood) (Miller 2013; Peteet et al. 2018; Phillips et al. 2009), thus making re-examination of these associations at midlife a compelling addition to the literature.
Recent epidemiological assessments suggest that midlife confers the highest rate of lifetime prevalence of MDD, with women and those who were widowed/separated/divorced at increased risk (Hasin et al. 2005). Lifetime prevalence rates of MDD during this stage of life range from 16% to 22% (Hasin et al. 2005; Kessler et al. 2010). Risk factors for depression in midlife include poor quality of relationships, smoking, low self-esteem, functional impairment due to disability or illness, and lifetime and/or family history of depression (Bakhshaie et al. 2015; Barkow et al. 2003; Crowell et al. 2014; Orth et al. 2016; Teo et al. 2013; Zeiss et al. 1996). The shift into midlife often brings with it changes in the family dynamic including children leaving the home, children returning home, dissolution of marriages and conflicting demands on time including work and caregiving, which are all associated with depressive symptoms or diagnosis (Marks 1998; Dennerstein et al. 2004; Kessler et al. 2004; Sbarra et al. 2014).
Risk for recurrence of depression at midlife appears to peak in midlife for women, but in older age for men (Draper and Low 2009). Differential risk by gender for new onset and recurrence may be conferred by the perimenopause for women (Bromberger et al. 2015; Cohen et al. 2006), although mixed findings suggest that this risk is not solely conferred by biological changes (Gibbs et al. 2012; Hickey et al. 2012; Soares 2013). Family and lifetime history of depression may confer risk above and beyond other biological risks during this period (Colvin et al. 2014).
Little is known about whether the reported protective benefits of R/S remain consistent across the lifespan, or whether developmental effects might be seen through middle adulthood in a dynamic relationship with depression. For lack of longitudinal research to date, a relationship between R/S and depression has yet to show nuance or capture change across time. In a cross-sectional study that gathered data on past and current religious activity, shifts in religious activity from childhood to adulthood was associated with lifetime psychiatric diagnoses (Maselko and Buka 2008). Limitations of this study included lack of information on familial risk for depression. One cross-sectional study evidenced differential associations by gender between spirituality and depression at midlife, with men’s (but not women’s) self-report of level of spirituality inversely associated with depression (Ellermann and Reed 2001). Two longitudinal studies examining R/S and depression at midlife have conflicting findings. The first showed that R/S is protective against depression and is associated with mental well-being at midlife (Dillon and Wink 2007), while the other found that R/S confers risk for depression at midlife, but only when spirituality is reported as greater than religiosity (Vittengl 2018). Although there is no consensus among the few studies that examine R/S and depression at midlife, there are numerous studies showing the protective benefits of R/S against depression in older adults (Braam et al. 2001; Cruz et al. 2009; Koenig 2007; Li et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2012; Hayward et al. 2012). As mental health at midlife is a great predictor of physical and mental health in older adulthood, it is important that this relationship is explored as thoroughly as it has been in geriatric samples.
In summary, there are few longitudinal studies examining the association between R/S and depression at midlife and none that have examined this relationship prospectively across familial risk groups and at multiple time points across the lifespan. With the roles and developmental changes unique to this stage and contributing to increased risk for depression an understanding of whether R/S is protective against MDD at midlife is prudent. To address this gap in the literature, we pose the following research questions:
 (1)
Is R/S associated with onset or recurrence of depression at midlife?
 (2)
Does the association between R/S and depression at midlife differ by familial risk for depression?

2. Methods

The data for this study come from assessments at year 20 and year 25/30 of a 30 year longitudinal study of individuals at high and low risk for major depression. The participants, offspring at high risk and low risk for depression (based on parental status), were part of a previous study (Miller et al. 2012) and were interviewed at their most recent assessment time point. The majority of subjects were last assessed at year 30 (n = 63, M = 49 years). A smaller subset of the sample (n = 16, M = 40 years) was offered the opportunity to participate in an imaging study at year 25. As not all of the original sample returned for the year 30 assessment, these subsets of the original sample were combined and the time point is referenced henceforth as year 25/30. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at both Yale University and Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute.
The original study consisted of probands with moderate to severe MDD who received outpatient psychopharmacologic treatment of depression. Healthy matched subjects were simultaneously selected from a sample of adults with no psychiatric history from the same community. Full methodological details have been published elsewhere (Weissman et al. 1997, 2006; Weissman et al. 2016a) and are summarized here. The original probands were mainly working-class or middle-class Caucasians from the New England area to reduce heterogeneity, as was customary when this study commenced. At each wave, assessments were conducted by clinical interviewers who were blind to the proband’s clinical status and the subject’s clinical history. Biological offspring were then followed. Offspring with one or more parent with MDD were identified as high risk (HR) and offspring with no parents with MDD were identified as low risk (LR).

2.1. Study Participants

Study participants were a subset of the original offspring subjects from the studies at year 10 and year 20. At year 10, 151 offspring were eligible for this study. At year 20, a final group of 114 offspring were eligible for this study if they participated in this study at both year 10 and year 20, reported on their R/S consistently at both time points and answered three items on R/S (refer to Assessments below) at both time points, and were assessed for psychiatric diagnoses at year 20. At the time, those offspring who did not report their denomination as Catholic or Protestant were excluded to keep consistent with the initial study in which denomination group was used a grouping variable (Miller et al. 1997). Of the 114 subjects who were included in the previous sample 35 did not participate in the year 25/30 assessment (79/114 = 69.2%): 25 declined, 7 could not be located or scheduled, and 3 did not complete questions on R/S at year 25 or year 30. The 79 participants included in the sample and the 35 who did not participate were compared on gender, age, risk status, MDD status between year 10 and year 20, lifetime history of depression at year 20, and religiosity variables at year 20. The only significant difference between groups was that of frequency of service attendance (35 = 40%, 79 = 63%, χ2 = 5.34, p = 0.02), such that individuals who dropped out were less likely to attend services at least once a month than those who stayed in.

2.2. Assessments

Major depression was assessed at all time points with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Lifetime Version (SADS) for adults (Mannuzza et al. 1986). A diagnosis of MDD at year 20 was defined as a major depressive episode between year 10 and year 20 and a diagnosis of MDD at year 25/30 was defined as a major depressive episode between year 20 and year 25 or year 30, respectively.
Assessment of R/S at year 20 and year 25/30 was based on three self-report items: (1) personal importance of religion/spirituality (“How important to you is religion or spirituality?” with response options ranging from 1 [not important at all] to 4 [highly important]); (2) frequency of attendance (“How often, if at all, do you attend church, synagogue, or other religious or spiritual services?” with five response choices ranging from “never” to “once a week or more”); and (3) current religious denomination (“How would you describe your current religious beliefs? Is there a particular denomination or religious organization that you are part of?” with 10 denominations specified, including an opportunity to specify others. R/S was composed of these three variables in the analyses at year 20 and year 25/30. Personal importance of R/S and frequency of attendance were dichotomized into binary variables to remain consistent with previous studies (Miller et al. 1997, 2012). Personal importance was split into high importance (ratings equal to 4) and low importance (ratings <4). Frequency of attendance was split into high frequency (≥1 time per month) and low frequency (<1 time per month).

2.3. Interviewers and Best-Estimate Procedure

Masters- and doctoral-level mental health workers who were blind to parents’ clinical status and any previous history, including religion variables, administered diagnostic clinical interviews. Multiple informants and sources were used, including first-person and corroborative interviews and medical records. All final diagnoses were based on a best-estimate procedure (Leckman et al. 1982) by either a psychiatrist or a Ph.D. psychologist who was blind to the risk status and was not involved with interviewing.

3. Statistical Analysis

McNemar tests were used for preliminary analyses of within-group differences in demographic variables, rates of depression, and R/S variables in the sample group between year 20 and year 25/30. Chi-square tests were used for between-group differences between risk groups at year 25/30. Logistic regression analyses examined religiosity as a prospective protective factor against major depression. Year 25/30 major depression was the dichotomous outcome variable and each of the year 20 religiosity variables were used individually to conduct univariate regression. Age, sex, parental depression (risk) status, and lifetime history of MDD were included to control for potential confounds.
As previous findings have shown differential associations by risk and by lifetime history of depression, we sought to determine whether risk for depression (based on parental lifetime depression status) moderated the effect of R/S on subsequent recurrence and new onset of depression. The data were stratified both by risk status and lifetime history of depression (yes/no). Within these stratified groups, logistic regression analyses examined the three R/S variables at year 20 as predictors of the outcome of depression at year 25/30. Age and gender were included as covariates in the analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 20 for MAC.

4. Results

4.1. Sample Characteristics

Table 1 summarizes the demographic and clinical variables and responses to the three religiosity items at year 25/30 for the 79 participants whose data were included in the analysis. The data were stratified by risk. In the period between year 20 and year 25/30 there was an overall increase in the lifetime rate of depression (year 20 = 51%, year 25/30 = 58%, p = 0.03), a decrease in the rate of frequent attendance (year 20 = 63%, year 25/30 = 43%, p < 0.001), and changes in marital status (year 20, married = 62%, year 25/30, married = 75%. p = 0.03). The rates of marital status, income, and education did not differ between risk groups at year 25/30.
The rate of lifetime major depression at year 20 was twice as great in the high-risk group as the low-risk group (61% [33/54] compared with 28% [7/25]; χ2 = 7.50, df = 1, p < 0.01). However, prevalence of major depression between year 20 and year 25/30 did not differ significantly between the high-risk group and the low-risk group (37% [20/54] compared with 24% [6/25]). Although the rates of importance and attendance were consistently greater at year 20 and year 25/30 in the low-risk group as compared to the high-risk group, these differences were not statistically significant.

4.2. Religiosity and Major Depression

Table 2 lists, for each of the three R/S variables, the odds ratios for major depression at 25/30 year follow up while controlling for age, sex, risk status, and history of depression of offspring in the full sample. Participants with high personal importance of R/S compared with other participants had approximately 4 fold the risk of having an episode of major depression between year 20 and year 25/30 (OR = 4.10, 95% CI = 1.14–14.73, p = 0.03). Frequent attendance at religious services at year 20 was significantly associated with the odds of major depression between year 20 and year 25/30, such that participants who attended religious services at least once a month were 4 fold as likely to experience a major depressive episode than those who did not (OR = 4.07, 95% CI = 1.05–15.70, p = 0.04). Religious denomination at year 20 was not associated with MDD at year 25/30.

4.3. Recurrence versus New Onset of Major Depression

Table 3 lists the odds ratios for recurrence and new onset of major depression at 25/30 year follow up while controlling for age and sex of offspring for each of the three religiosity variables. Participants with no previous history of depression and reported high personal importance of R/S had approximately 14 fold the risk of having an episode of major depression between year 20 and year 25/30 (OR = 14.42; 95% CI = 1.06–196.51, p = 0.05), regardless of risk status. For participants with a previous history of depression, there was a significant association between frequent attendance at year 20 and recurrence of major depression between year 20 and year 25/30 (OR = 6.44; 95% CI =1.13–36.65, p = 0.04). When stratified by risk (data not shown), this association held only in the HR group (OR = 9.54; 95% CI = 1.18–77.32, p = 0.04). To test the possibility that individuals with recurrent depression at year 25/30 were more likely to be frequent attenders at year 20 because they were more likely to be depressed between year 10 and year 20, we examined the association between MDD at year 20 (defined as an episode of MDD between year 10 and year 20) and attendance at year 20. If this were true, we would expect to find that participants with MDD between year 10 and year 20 would be more likely to attend religious services at year 20; however, we found no significant association between these two variables at year 20.

5. Discussion

With the shift into midlife in our longitudinal study sample, we found an overall increase in the lifetime rate of depression, a decrease in the frequency of attendance at religious services (≥1 time per month), and significant changes in marital status in the entire sample between year 20 and year 25/30. When divided by familial risk for depression (HR and LR), rates of diagnosis of MDD between year 20 and year 25/30 (new onset and recurrence combined) did not differ significantly as compared to significantly different lifetime rates of MDD between HR and LR groups at year 20, with the HR group having significantly higher rates of depression than the LR group. Rates of importance of R/S and frequent attendance did not differ significantly between the groups. Importance of R/S and frequent attendance of religious services at year 20 predicted MDD at year 25/30. When the group was divided based on both lifetime history of MDD (yes/no) and risk status (HR/LR), importance of R/S at year 20 was predictive of new onset of MDD at year 25/30 across groups. Attending religious services at least once a month was predictive of recurrence of MDD between year 20 and year 25/30 uniquely in the HR group.

5.1. Research Questions

5.1.1. Is R/S Associated with Depression at Midlife?

In this sample, regardless of risk status, the importance of R/S at year 20 was associated with a 14-fold increased risk of new onset of MDD at year 25/30. Frequency of attendance and denomination did not predict a new onset, suggesting that importance of R/S confers unique risk (among these three measures of R/S) for depression at midlife for those who have never experienced a depressive episode before. In that the importance of R/S previously was found in the same sample to be protective against depression during early adulthood and middle adulthood and there is a growing body of evidence to suggest a similar association in older adulthood as well (Koenig 2017), these longitudinal findings may suggest a changing relationship between R/S and depression across adult development, with a passage of risk for depression bracketed at midlife.
That developmental risk for new onset of depression was 14 fold for those who reported that R/S was important is in contrast with a small body of research on R/S at midlife, which suggests that R/S is associated with mental well-being at midlife (Ellermann and Reed 2001; Dillon and Wink 2007). Importantly, the self-rated level of R/S in this sample is, on average, much higher than in Dillon and Wink’s sample. Taken with the previous findings that dimensions of R/S have been protective in this sample, individuals’ wellbeing in this sample may be closely tied to a personal importance of R/S. We can conjecture that, alongside this stable personal importance of R/S, protective benefits may be mitigated and even for a passage in time reversed via aspects of R/S identified (but not measured here) as mediators of a direct association between R/S and depression such as intrinsic religiosity, negative religious coping, or spiritual struggle (Abu-Raiya et al. 2015; Braam et al. 2014; Pargament et al. 2004; Pearce and Koenig 2016; Smith et al. 2003; Sternthal et al. 2010; Pirutinsky and Rosmarin 2018) if potentially stressed by specific developmental challenges, losses or responsibilities endemic to midlife. These studies and others suggest that highly religious/spiritual individuals, stressed under the conditions of negative life events, may be more likely to face spiritual struggle and depression.
From a developmental perspective, there has been a general consensus among classical and modern theorists that midlife is a time when individuals develop an increased interiority, reflectiveness, awareness of themselves in space and time, a renewed desire for balance in work and leisure, and a potential for integration of the self that exceeds that of prior developmental stages (Levinson 1978, 2011; Havighurst 1948; Neugarten 1968). Some theorists have included spiritual growth as part of a process of the integration of a differentiated self, emerging via confronting and overcoming a complex environment (Bianchi 2011; Jung 1952; Neugarten 1968). Those theorists focused specifically on R/S development have suggested that midlife is a time during which the individual faces existential voids and conflict, yet can be propelled through this process to reach a deeper transcendence, appreciation of life, and relationship with G-d or their Higher Power (Fowler 1981; Jung 1960). The R/S challenges inherent in midlife ultimately can be transformative, perhaps even requisite for maturation of faith (Koenig 1994). Qualitative data suggest that R/S development includes passages that are arduous, non-linear, and extends beyond the self to include and interact with interpersonal and relational facets of life (Ray and McFadden 2001; Russo-Netzer and Mayseless 2017). This non-linear development of R/S mirrors research on the trajectory of R/S over the lifespan that suggests: R/S often emerges through struggle across adolescence and emerging adulthood, is highly protective throughout adulthood, and then undergoes a second wave of emergence through struggle from midlife that is highly protective in late adulthood (Desrosiers and Miller 2007; Dillon and Wink 2007; Wink and Dillon 2002). The data from the present study may reflect the impact of incumbent challenges in midlife and process of struggle and emergent growth as it relates to R/S at this stage.
It is noteworthy that individuals with the strongest spirituality and religiousness struggle the most at midlife. This developmental phase of R/S might reflect the notion shared across religious traditions of a “dark night of the soul,” a time when the more spiritually connected experience challenges or felt distance more acutely, leading in time to a deepening of faith. A follow-up study on this sample on the other side of midlife would further address this potential process.

5.1.2. Does the Association between R/S and Depression at Midlife Differ by Risk Group?

Although the association between importance of R/S did not confer a differential risk for depression between HR and LR groups, we found that frequency of attendance at year 20 was associated with an increased risk of recurrence of depression in midlife by 10 fold in the HR group. Longitudinal data on the original depressed probands of this study illustrate that the protective effect of church attendance has rather been associated with risk when controlling for other R/S variables at midlife (Miller et al. 1997), suggesting a familial susceptibility to recurrent depression that offsets any protective capacity of frequent attendance at this stage. Alternately, individuals at HR for depression may seek out companionship or social support through religious community (Ano and Vasconcelles 2005; Ellison et al. 1994; Holt et al. 2013), which may explain this association.

5.2. Clinical Implications

The protective benefits of R/S need to be seen in a long-term developmental trajectory with passages of R/S struggle, emergence and strengthening. The majority of studies to date are cross sectional. Most studies show a strong protective benefit of R/S against depression, while some studies have shown R/S to be a risk factor for depression either 1) during phases of emergent development such as adolescence or midlife, or 2) under potentially distorting formative conditions of parental psychopathology or developmental psychopathology (Gur et al. 2005; Miller et al. 2002; Sorenson et al. 1995) or when missing central protective qualities such as connection to God (Kendler et al. 1997; Pargament et al. 2005).
A host of treatment models have been published that address R/S struggles, emergence and strengthening within psychotherapy (Koenig 2012b; Koszycki et al. 2014; Pargament 2007; Pearce et al. 2015; Santiago and Gall 2016; for reviews see Hodge 2006; McCullough 1999; Smith et al. 2007). Awareness of the developmental R/S across adulthood in mental health treatment is essential, as some studies suggest that some religious individuals avoid psychotherapy due to both perceptions about and actual tendencies of clinicians to in marginalize or exclude faith beliefs in the treatment process (Bergin 1991; Delaney et al. 2007; Hathaway et al. 2004; Mayers et al. 2007; Richards and Bergin 2000; Shafranske and Gorsuch 1984). This, in combination with recent findings that more than half of treating clinicians do not feel competent addressing patients’ religiosity and spirituality (Vieten et al. 2013, 2016) suggests that efforts to bridge the gap between patient beliefs and clinician readiness should focus on aspects of clinical training.

5.3. Limitations

To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first longitudinal study to assess the changing relationship between R/S and depression at midlife, potentially shedding light on spiritual struggle at midlife, particularly among people with a strong personal R/S. Study limitations include difficulty in generalizing these findings due to the sample’s size and demographically homogeneous makeup. To remain consistent with other studies using this sample, religiosity and spirituality are not distinguished as separate variables in this study and are dichotomized. The individuals from this sample endorsed high levels of R/S and thus, the differences between the ’high’ and ‘low’ R/S groups may be more subtle than in other studies which examine data such as these in this fashion. Further, this sample is predominantly Catholic and therefore not representative of the overall U.S. population.
In this high-risk longitudinal sample, there was a high rate of individuals with previous depressive episodes and a small number of cases of new onset of depression. We also are unable to account for mechanisms for drop out and thus selected to use listwise deletion of cases rather than impute missing data, recognizing this changes the data available to estimate model parameters. Additionally, the width of confidence intervals in the regression analyses were large and we did not adjust p values for multiple comparisons. Finally, the significant difference in frequency of attendance between the retained sample and those who did not participate from the previous study suggests that individuals who frequently attended religious/spiritual services were more likely to participate in this study. Thus, these findings must be interpreted with caution.

6. Conclusions

The current longitudinal, prospective study shows that R/S is associated with a 14-fold increase in risk for depression at midlife in the same sample of adults to have derived a 75% protective benefit against depression during early and middle adulthood. This life-course study raises the possibility of a period of spiritual struggle, a “dark night of the soul” in the changing relationship between R/S and depression during the passage of midlife.
This interpretation of an adult development model, that includes the possibility of struggle and potentially emergent growth at midlife, is raised by the longitudinal nature of this study, specifically in that the association of R/S and depression changes across the life course from offering sustained protective benefits through child-rearing years of middle adulthood, to then conferring risk across risk groups at midlife. Alongside evidence that R/S guards against depression among younger and older adults, this study may highlight a developmental effect specific to midlife that is subject to further change in future life stages. The limitations of these data highlight the need for further inquiry into the prospective risk for depression at midlife associated with R/S.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.A. and L.M.; methodology, M.R.A., P.W., C.S. and L.M.; formal analysis, M.R.A. and P.W.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.A. and L.M.; writing—review and editing, M.R.A., P.W., C.S. and L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The analyses were funded by the John Templeton Foundation (54679; 61330). The data collection was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (2 R01 MH36197).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute (protocol #7233; date of approval: 21 January 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data were obtained as part of an ongoing, multi-generational study of families at risk for depression that started in 1982 (before data sharing existed); therefore, consent was not obtained. According to the Institutional Review Board at Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, public data sharing, even anonymously, is restricted by participants’ informed consent.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abu-Raiya, Hisham, Kenneth I. Pargament, Neal Krause, and Gail Ironson. 2015. Robust Links between Religious/Spiritual Struggles, Psychological Distress, and Well-Being in a National Sample of American Adults. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 85: 565–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ano, Gene G., and Erin B. Vasconcelles. 2005. Religious Coping and Psychological Adjustment to Stress: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology 61: 461–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bakhshaie, Jafar, Michael J. Zvolensky, and Renee D. Goodwin. 2015. Cigarette Smoking and the Onset and Persistence of Depression among Adults in the United States: 1994–2005. Comprehensive Psychiatry 60: 142–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Barkow, Katrin, Wolfgang Maier, T. Bedirhan Ustun, Michael Gansicke, Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, and Reinhard Heun. 2003. Risk Factors for Depression at 12-Month Follow-up in Adult Primary Health Care Patients with Major Depression: An International Prospective Study. Journal of Affective Disorders 76: 157–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bergin, Allen E. 1991. Values and Religious Issues in Psychotherapy and Mental Health. American Psychologist 46: 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bianchi, Eugene C. 2011. Aging as a Spiritual Journey. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonelli, Raphael, Rachel E. Dew, Harold G. Koenig, David H. Rosmarin, and Sasan Vasegh. 2012. Religious and Spiritual Factors in Depression: Review and Integration of the Research. Depression Research and Treatment 2012: 962860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Braam, Arjan W., and Harold G. Koenig. 2019. Religion, spirituality and depression in prospective studies: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders 257: 428–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Braam, Arjan W., Dorly J. H. Deeg, Jan L. Poppelaars, Aartjan T. F. Beekman, and Willem Van Tilburg. 2007. Prayer and Depressive Symptoms in a Period of Secularization: Patterns among Older Adults in the Netherlands. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 15: 273–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Braam, Arjan W., Hanneke Schaap-Jonker, Marleen H. L. Van Der Horst, Bas Steunenberg, Aartjan T. F. Beekman, Willem Van Tilburg, and Dorly J. H. Deeg. 2014. Twelve-Year History of Late-Life Depression and Subsequent Feelings to God. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 22: 1272–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Braam, Arjan W., P. Van Den Eeden, M. J. Prince, A. T. F. Beekman, S. L. Kivelä, B. A. Lawlor, A. Birkhofer, R. Fuhrer, A. Lobo, H. Magnusson, and et al. 2001. Religion as a Cross-Cultural Determinant of Depression in Elderly Europeans: Results from the EURODEP Collaboration. Psychological Medicine 31: 803–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bromberger, Joyce T., L. Schott, H. M. Kravitz, and H. Joffe. 2015. Risk Factors for Major Depression during Midlife among a Community Sample of Women with and without Prior Major Depression: Are They the Same or Different? Psychological Medicine 45: 1653–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Cohen, Lee S., Claudio N. Soares, Allison F. Vitonis, Michael W. Otto, and Bernard L. Harlow. 2006. Risk for New Onset of Depression during the Menopausal Transition the Harvard Study of Moods and Cycles. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63: 385–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Colvin, Alicia, Gale A. Richardson, Jill M. Cyranowski, Ada Youk, and Joyce T. Bromberger. 2014. Does Family History of Depression Predict Major Depression in Midlife Women? Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation Mental Health Study (SWAN MHS). Archives of Women’s Mental Health 17: 269–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Crowell, Judith A., Eric Dearing, Cynthia R. Davis, Claudia Miranda-Julian, Ayelet R. Barkai, Nicole Usher, Sarah Trifiletti, and Christos Mantzoros. 2014. Partnership and Extended Family Relationship Quality Moderate Associations between Lifetime Psychiatric Diagnoses and Current Depressive Symptoms in Midlife. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 33: 612–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cruz, Mario, Richard Schulz, Harold A. Pincus, Patricia R. Houck, Salem Bensasi, and Charles F. Reynolds. 2009. The Association of Public and Private Religious Involvement with Severity of Depression and Hopelessness in Older Adults Treated for Major Depression. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 17: 503–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Delaney, Harold D., William R. Miller, and Ana M. Bisonó. 2007. Religiosity and Spirituality among Psychologists: A Survey of Clinician Members of the American Psychological Association. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 38: 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dennerstein, Lorraine, Janet R. Guthrie, Margaret Clark, Philippe Lehert, and Victor W. Henderson. 2004. A Population-Based Study of Depressed Mood in Middle-Aged, Australian-Born Women. Menopause 11: 563–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Desrosiers, Alethea, and Lisa Miller. 2007. Relational spirituality and depression in adolescent girls. Journal of clinical psychology 63: 1021–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dillon, Michele, and Paul Wink. 2007. In the Course of a Lifetime: Tracing Religious Belief, Practice, and Change. Oakland: Oakland University Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Draper, Brian, and Lee Fay Low. 2009. Patterns of Hospitalisation for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders across the Lifespan in Australia. Journal of Affective Disorders 113: 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ellermann, Caroline R., and Pamela G. Reed. 2001. Self-Transcendence and Depression in Middle-Age Adults. Western Journal of Nursing Research 23: 698–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ellison, Christopher G., Linda K. George, Christopher G. Ellisont, and Linda K. Georget. 1994. Religious Involvement, Social Ties, and Social Support in a Southeastern Community. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 33: 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fowler, James W. 1981. Stages of Faith: The Psychology of Human Development and the Quest for Meaning. San Francisco: Harper & Row. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibbs, Zoe, Stuart Lee, and Jayashri Kulkarni. 2012. What Factors Determine Whether a Woman Becomes Depressed during the Perimenopause? Archives of Women’s Mental Health 15: 323–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gur, Merav, Lisa Miller, Virginia Warner, Priya Wickramaratne, and Myrna Weissman. 2005. Maternal Depression and the Intergenerational Transmission of Religion. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 193: 338–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Hasin, Deborah S., Renee D. Goodwin, Frederick S. Stinson, and Bridget F. Grant. 2005. Epidemiology of Major Depressive Disorder Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry 62: 1097–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hathaway, William L., Stacey Y. Scott, and Stacey A. Garver. 2004. Assessing Religious/Spiritual Functioning: A Neglected Domain in Clinical Practice? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 35: 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Havighurst, Rober James. 1948. Developmental Tasks and Education. New York: McKay. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hayward, R. David, Amy D. Owen, Harold G. Koenig, David C. Steffens, and Martha E. Payne. 2012. Longitudinal Relationships of Religion with Posttreatment Depression Severity in Older Psychiatric Patients: Evidence of Direct and Indirect Effects. Depression Research and Treatment 2012: 745970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hickey, Martha, C. Bryant, and F. Judd. 2012. Evaluation and Management of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Midlife. Climacteric 15: 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hodge, David R. 2006. Spiritually Modified Cognitive Therapy: A Review of the Literature. Social Work 51: 157–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Holt, Cheryl L., Min Qi Wang, Eddie M. Clark, Beverly Rosa Williams, and Emily Schulz. 2013. Religious Involvement and Physical and Emotional Functioning among African Americans: The Mediating Role of Religious Support. Psychology & Health 28: 267–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jung, Carl. 1952. The Transcendent Function. Translated by A. R. Pope. Zurich: Student Association, CG Jung Institute. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jung, Carl. 1960. The transcendent function. In The Collected Works of C.G. Jung (Vol. 8). Translated by R. F.C. Hull. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kendler, Kenneth S., Charles O. Gardner, and Carol A. Prescott. 1997. Religion, Psychopathology, and Substance Use and Abuse: A Multimeasure, Genetic-Epidemiologic Study. The American Journal of Psychiatry 154: 322–29. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kessler, Ronald, Howard Birnbaum, Evelyn Bromet, Irving Hwang, Nancy Sampson, and Victoria Shahly. 2010. Age Differences in Major Depression: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Psychological Medicine 40: 225–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Kessler, Ronald, Kristin D. Mickelson, Ellen E. Walters, Shanyang Zhao, and Lana Hamilton. 2004. Age and Depression in the MIDUS Survey. In How Healthy Are We? A National Study of Well-Being at Midlife. Edited by Orville Gilbert Brim, Carol D. Ryff and Ronald C. Kessler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 227–51. [Google Scholar]
  39. Koenig, Harold G. 1994. Aging and God. Binghamton: Haworth Pastoral Press, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  40. Koenig, Harold G. 2007. Religion and Depression in Older Medical Inpatients. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 15: 282–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Koenig, Harold G. 2017. Religion and Spirituality in Gerontology. In Spirituality and Religion Within the Culture of Medicine: From Evidence to Practice. Edited by Michael Baldeni and John Peteet. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  42. Koenig, Harold G. 2012a. Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications. ISRN Psychiatry 2012: 278730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Koenig, Harold G. 2012b. Religious versus Conventional Psychotherapy for Major Depression in Patients with Chronic Medical Illness: Rationale, Methods, and Preliminary Results. Depression Research and Treatment 2012: 460419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Koenig, Harold G., Dana E. King, and Verna B. Carson, eds. 2012. Handbook of Religion and Health, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  45. Koszycki, Diana, Cynthia Bilodeau, Kelley Raab-Mayo, and Jacques Bradwejn. 2014. A Multifaith Spiritually Based Intervention versus Supportive Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology 70: 489–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lawrence, Ryan E., David Brent, J. John Mann, Ainsley K. Burke, Michael F. Grunebaum, Hanga C. Galfalvy, and Maria A. Oquendo. 2016. Religion as a Risk Factor for Suicide Attempt and Suicide Ideation among Depressed Patients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 204: 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Leckman, James F., Diane Sholomskas, Douglas Thompson, Arthur Belanger, and Myrna M. Weissman. 1982. Best Estimate of Lifetime Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Methodological Study. Archives of General Psychiatry 39: 879–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Levinson, Daniel Jacob. 1978. The Seasons of a Man’s Life. New York: Ballantine Books. [Google Scholar]
  49. Levinson, Daniel Jacob. 2011. The Seasons of a Woman’s Life: A Fascinating Exploration of the Events, Thoughts, and Life Experiences That all Women Share. New York: Ballantine Books. [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, Shanshan, Olivia I. Okereke, Shun Chiao Chang, Ichiro Kawachi, and Tyler J. VanderWeele. 2016. Religious Service Attendance and Lower Depression Among Women—A Prospective Cohort Study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 50: 876–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Mannuzza, Salvatore, Abby J. Fyer, Donald F. Klein, and Jean Endicott. 1986. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version Modified for the Study of Anxiety Disorders (SADS-LA): Rationale and Conceptual Development. Journal of Psychiatric Research 20: 317–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Marks, Nadine. 1998. Does It Hurt to Care? Caregiving, Work-Family Conflict, and Midlife Well-Being. Journal of Marriage and Family 60: 951–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Maselko, Joanna, and Stephen Buka. 2008. Religious Activity and Lifetime Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorder. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 43: 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mayers, Claire, Gerard Leavey, Christina Vallianatou, and Chris Barker. 2007. How Clients with Religious or Spiritual Beliefs Experience Psychological Help-Seeking and Therapy: A Qualitative Study. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 14: 317–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. McCullough, Michael E. 1999. Research on Religion-Accommodative Counseling: Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology 46: 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Miller, Lisa, Myrna Weissman, Merav Gur, and Steven Greenwald. 2002. Adult Religiousness and History of Childhood Depression: Eleven-Year Follow-up Study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 190: 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Miller, Lisa, Priya Wickramaratne, Marc J. Gameroff, Mia Sage, Ma E. Craig Tenke, and Myrna M. Weissman. 2012. Religiosity and Major Depression in Adults at High Risk: A Ten-Year Prospective Study. American Journal of Psychiatry 169: 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Miller, Lisa, Virginia Warner, Priya Wickramaratne, and Myrna Weissman. 1997. Religiosity and Depression: Ten-Year Follow-up of Depressed Mothers and Offspring. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 36: 1416–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Miller, Lisa. 2013. Spiritual Awakening and Depression in Adolescents: A Unified Pathway or “Two Sides of the Same Coin”. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 77: 332–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Neugarten, Bernice, ed. 1968. Middle Age and Aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  61. Orth, Ulrich, Richard W. Robins, Laurenz L. Meier, and Rand D. Conger. 2016. Refining the Vulnerability Model of Low Self-Esteem and Depression: Disentangling the Effects of Genuine Self-Esteem and Narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110: 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Pargament, Kenneth I. 2007. Spiritually Integrated Psychotherapy: Understanding and Addressing the Sacred. New York: Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  63. Pargament, Kenneth I., Harold G. Koenig, Nalini Tarakeshwar, and June Hahn. 2004. Religious Coping Methods as Predictors of Psychological, Physical and Spiritual Outcomes among Medically Ill Elderly Patients: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Health Psychology 9: 713–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pargament, Kenneth I., Nichole A. Murray-Swank, Gina M. Magyar, and Gene G. Ano. 2005. Spiritual Struggle: A Phenomenon of Interest to Psychology and Religion. In Judeo-Christian Perspectives on Psychology: Human Nature, Motivation, and Change. Edited by W. R. Miller and H. D. Delaney. Washington, DC: APA, pp. 245–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pearce, Michelle J., and Harold G. Koenig. 2016. Spiritual Struggles and Religious Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Those with Depression and Chronic Medical Illness. Journal of Psychology & Theology 44: 3–15. [Google Scholar]
  66. Pearce, Michelle J., Harold G. Koenig, Clive J. Robins, Bruce Nelson, Sally F. Shaw, Harvey J. Cohen, and Michael B. King. 2015. Religiously Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A New Method of Treatment for Major Depression in Patients with Chronic Medical Illness. Psychotherapy 52: 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Peteet, John R., Faten Al Zaben, and Harold G. Koenig. 2018. Integrating Spirituality into the Care of Older Adults. International Psychogeriatrics 31: 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Phillips, Laura L., Amber L. Paukert, Melinda A. Stanley, and Mark E. Kunik. 2009. Incorporating Religion and Spirituality to Improve Care for Anxiety and Depression in Older Adults. Geriatrics 64: 15–18. [Google Scholar]
  69. Pirutinsky, Steven, and David H. Rosmarin. 2018. Protective and Harmful Effects of Religious Practice on Depression Among Jewish Individuals with Mood Disorders. Clinical Psychological Science 6: 601–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ray, Ruth, and Susan McFadden. 2001. The web and the quilt: Alternatives to the heroic journey toward spiritual development. Journal of Adult Development 8: 201–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Richards, P. Scott, and Allen E. Bergin. 2000. Towards religious and Spiritual competency for mental health. In Handbook of Psychotherapy and Religious Diversity. Edited by P. Scott Richards and Allen E. Bergin. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  72. Russo-Netzer, Pninit, and Ofra Mayseless. 2017. Spiritual change outside institutional religion as inner work on the self: Deep within and beyond. Journal of Adult Development 24: 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Santiago, Pia Newell, and Terry Lynn Gall. 2016. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a Spiritually Integrated Psychotherapy. Counseling and Values 61: 239–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sbarra, David A., Robert E. Emery, Christopher R. Beam, and Bailey L. Ocker. 2014. Marital Dissolution and Major Depression in Midlife: A Propensity Score Analysis. Clinical Psychological Science 2: 249–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Shafranske, E.P., and R.L. Gorsuch. 1984. Factors Associated with the Perception of Spirituality in Psychotherapy. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 16: 231–43. [Google Scholar]
  76. Sharma, Vanshdeep, Deborah B. Marin, Harold K. Koenig, Adriana Feder, Brian M. Iacoviello, Steven M. Southwick, and Robert H. Pietrzak. 2017. Religion, Spirituality, and Mental Health of U.S. Military Veterans: Results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study. Journal of Affective Disorders 217: 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Smith, Timothy B., Jeremy Bartz, and P. Scott Richards. 2007. Outcomes of Religious and Spiritual Adaptations to Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychotherapy Research 17: 643–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Smith, Timothy B., Michael E. McCullough, and Justin Poll. 2003. Religiousness and Depression: Evidence for a Main Effect and the Moderating Influence of Stressful Life Events. Psychological Bulletin 116: 614–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Soares, Claudio N. 2013. Depression in Peri- and Postmenopausal Women: Prevalence, Pathophysiology and Pharmacological Management. Drugs and Aging 30: 677–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sorenson, Ann Marie, Carl F. Grindstaff, and R. J. Turner. 1995. Religious Involvement among Unmarried Adolescent Mothers: A Source of Emotional Support? Sociology of Religion 56: 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sternthal, Michelle J., David R. Williams, Marc A. Musick, and Anna C. Buck. 2010. Depression, Anxiety, and Religious Life: A Search for Mediators. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51: 343–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sun, Fei, Nan S. Park, Lucinda L. Roff, David L. Klemmack, Michael Parker, Harold G. Koenig, Patricia Sawyer, and Richard M. Allman. 2012. Predicting the Trajectories of Depressive Symptoms among Southern Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Role of Religiosity. Aging and Mental Health 16: 189–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Teo, Alan R., HwaJung J. Choi, and Marcia Valenstein. 2013. Social Relationships and Depression: Ten-Year Follow-Up from a Nationally Representative Study. PLoS ONE 8: e62396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Vieten, Cassandra, Shelley Scammell, Alan Pierce, Ron Pilato, Ingrid Ammondson, Kenneth I. Pargament, and David Lukoff. 2016. Competencies for Psychologists in the Domains of Religion and Spirituality. Spirituality in Clinical Practice 8: e62396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Vieten, Cassandra, Shelley Scammell, Ron Pilato, Ingrid Ammondson, Kenneth I. Pargament, and David Lukoff. 2013. Spiritual and Religious Competencies for Psychologists. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 5: 129–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Vittengl, Jeffrey R. 2018. A Lonely Search?: Risk for Depression When Spirituality Exceeds Religiosity. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 206: 386–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Weissman, Myrna M., Obianuju O. Berry, Virginia Warner, Marc J. Gameroff, Jamie Skipper, Ardesheer Talati, Daniel J. Pilowsky, and Priya Wickramaratne. 2016a. A 30-Year Study of 3 Generations at High Risk and Low Risk for Depression. JAMA Psychiatry 73: 970–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Weissman, Myrna M., Priya Wickramaratne, Marc J. Gameroff, Virginia Warner, Daniel Pilowsky, Rajni Gathibandhe Kohad, Helena Verdeli, Jamie Skipper, and Ardesheer Talati. 2016b. Offspring of Depressed Parents: 30 Years Later. American Journal of Psychiatry 173: 1024–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Weissman, Myrna M., Priya Wickramaratne, Yoko Nomura, Virginia Warner, Daniel Pilowsky, and Helen Verdeli. 2006. Offspring of Depressed Parents: 20 Years Later. American Journal of Psychiatry 163: 1001–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Weissman, Myrna M., Virginia Warner, Priya Wickramaratne, Donna Moreau, and Mark Olfson. 1997. Offspring of Depressed Parents 10 Years Later. Archives of General Psychiatry 54: 932–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wink, Paul, and Michele Dillon. 2002. Spiritual development across the adult life course: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Adult Development 9: 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zeiss, Antonette M., Peter M. Lewinsohn, Paul Rohde, and John R. Seeley. 1996. Relationship of Physical Disease and Functional Impairment to Depression in Older People. Psychology and Aging 11: 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Demographic, religiosity, and clinical characteristics of 79 adult offspring of depressed and nondepressed parents at 25/30-year follow-up in a 30-year study.
Table 1. Demographic, religiosity, and clinical characteristics of 79 adult offspring of depressed and nondepressed parents at 25/30-year follow-up in a 30-year study.
Characteristic
Low Risk (N = 25)High Risk (N = 54)
MeanSDMeanSD
Age45.85.448.27.4
N%N%
Female1456.03564.8
Annual income ($)
  <20,000 (low)14.023.7
  20,000–39,000 (medium)312.059.3
  >40,000 (high)2184.04379.6
Education level
  <High school00.011.9
  High school graduate624.01425.9
  >High school1976.03972.2
Marital status
  Single28.059.3
  Married2184.03870.4
  Separated or divorced28.01120.4
Religiosity
 Personal importance of religion/spirituality
  High1248.02342.6
  Moderate1248.02037.0
  Slight14.0713.0
  None00.047.4
 Frequent attendance at religious/spiritual services a1352.02138.9
 Religious denomination
  Protestant312.0814.8
  Catholic1976.03463.0
Clinical characteristics
 Major depression b
  Lifetime episode (at year 20) **728.03361.1
  Episode between year 20 and year 25/30624.02037.0
Notes: a Attends at least once a month; b Assessed with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version; ** Significant difference between group at p < 0.01.
Table
Table 2. Odds ratios of recurrence or onset of Major Depressive Disorder in 79 adult offspring of depressed and nondepressed parents between 20- and 25/30 year follow-ups associated with religiosity variables at year 20.
Table 2. Odds ratios of recurrence or onset of Major Depressive Disorder in 79 adult offspring of depressed and nondepressed parents between 20- and 25/30 year follow-ups associated with religiosity variables at year 20.
Univariate Models a
Religiosity VariableOdds Ratio95% CIWald χ2p
Religion/spirituality highly important4.101.14–14.734.690.03
Frequent attendance at religious/spiritual services4.071.05–15.704.150.04
Catholic (vs. Protestant)1.450.26–8.150.180.67
Notes: a For each of the three univariate models, the outcome measure is Major Depressive Disorder at year 25/30 (yes/no) and the primary predictor is the dichotomous religiosity variable at year 20. Sex, age, history of depression, and risk status (high or low, based on parental depression status) are controlled.
Table
Table 3. Odds ratios of recurrence and new onset of Major Depressive Disorder in 79 adult offspring of depressed and non-depressed parents between 20- and 25/30 year follow ups associated with religiosity variables at year 20.
Table 3. Odds ratios of recurrence and new onset of Major Depressive Disorder in 79 adult offspring of depressed and non-depressed parents between 20- and 25/30 year follow ups associated with religiosity variables at year 20.
Recurrence a,bNew Onset c,d
Religiosity VariableOdds Ratio95% CIWald χ2POdds Ratio95% CIWald χ2p
Religion/spirituality highly important2.440.57–10.461.440.2314.421.06–196.514.010.05
Frequent attendance at religious/spiritual services6.441.13–36.650.040.041.410.19–10.520.110.74
Catholic (vs. Protestant) 0.570.06–4.950.270.615.6*1080.000.000.99
Notes: a For this model, the outcome measure is recurrence of MDD, as defined by having a previous episode of MDD prior to the period between year 20 and year 25/30. Sex and age are controlled. b There were 20 individuals with a recurrence of a depressive episode between years 20 and 25/30. c For this model, the outcome measure is new onset of MDD, as defined by having no episodes of MDD prior to the period between year 20 and year 25/30. Sex and age are controlled. d There were 6 individuals with new onset of a depressive episode between years 20 and 25/30.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Anderson, M.R.; Wickramaratne, P.; Svob, C.; Miller, L. Religiosity and Depression at Midlife: A Prospective Study. Religions 2021, 12, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010028

AMA Style

Anderson MR, Wickramaratne P, Svob C, Miller L. Religiosity and Depression at Midlife: A Prospective Study. Religions. 2021; 12(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anderson, Micheline R., Priya Wickramaratne, Connie Svob, and Lisa Miller. 2021. "Religiosity and Depression at Midlife: A Prospective Study" Religions 12, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010028

APA Style

Anderson, M. R., Wickramaratne, P., Svob, C., & Miller, L. (2021). Religiosity and Depression at Midlife: A Prospective Study. Religions, 12(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010028

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop