You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
  • Review
  • Open Access

25 September 2025

Inductive Wireless Power Transfer for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: A Comprehensive Review of Technological Advances and Challenges

,
,
and
1
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Recent Marine Engineering Technology

Abstract

The endurance of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) has long been constrained by limited energy replenishment. Underwater inductive wireless power transfer (UIWPT), with its contactless power transfer capability, offers an innovative solution for efficient underwater charging of AUVs. This paper provides a systematic review of the architecture of UIWPT systems, analyzes key power loss mechanisms and corresponding optimization strategies, and summarizes the latest research progress in magnetic coupler design, compensation circuit topologies, control methods, simultaneous power and data transfer, and seawater-induced eddy current losses. Representative cases of UIWPT system integration on AUV platforms are also reviewed, with particular emphasis on environmental factors such as salinity variation, biofouling, and deep-sea pressure, as well as EMC, which critically constrain engineering applications. Finally, this paper discusses development trends including high-efficiency power transfer, enhanced reliability under extreme environments, and practical deployment challenges, and it presents a forward-looking technical roadmap towards long-term, autonomous, and intelligent underwater wireless power transfer.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the intensification of marine resource exploration and the growing demand for environmental monitoring have made the development of efficient and intelligent ocean exploration equipment a fundamental requirement in marine scientific research and engineering. Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), owing to their high autonomy and operational flexibility, have become indispensable tools for subsea mapping, resource exploration, ecological monitoring, and other related domains, demonstrating significant potential for both practical applications and academic research [1,2,3].
As exploration missions grow in complexity and duration, the energy demands of AUVs have increased significantly. Currently, AUVs rely on on-board energy storage [4,5]. However, because of limitations imposed by the size and weight of on-board devices, their battery capacities are insufficient to support long-duration and high-performance operations, thereby necessitating external energy replenishment [6,7]. Traditional energy replenishment methods include shore-based recovery charging [8] and underwater docking through wired connections [9,10]. The former requires frequent manual intervention, leading to decreased operational efficiency and elevated costs and risks [4]. The latter approach employs wet-mate connectors for power transfer, which enhances the long-term underwater residency capability of AUVs but remains constrained by corrosion susceptibility and limited mating cycles. Repeated usage can result in electrical faults, reduced equipment reliability, and high maintenance costs [11,12].
The development of wireless power transfer (WPT) technology began in the late 20th century, drawing on Nikola Tesla’s pioneering work in contactless power transfer [13]. It has since been widely applied in electric vehicles [14,15,16], consumer electronics [17], medical devices [18,19], and industrial automation systems [20,21]. WPT enables non-contact power transfer, significantly reducing maintenance requirements and operational risks. It is typically categorized into far-field methods, such as ultrasonic [22] and optical power transfer [23], and near-field methods, such as inductive [24] and capacitive [25] power transfer. In underwater environments, ultrasonic transmission is limited by severe signal attenuation, while optical transmission is hindered by environmental interference such as scattering and turbidity [26]; both face difficulties in achieving stable and efficient power transfer. Capacitive power transfer is limited by its frequency-dependent characteristics and constrained power capacity, leading to poor adaptability in underwater conditions [27,28]. In contrast, inductive wireless power transfer (IWPT) offers high efficiency, substantial power capacity, and enhanced operational safety, making it a key area of research in AUV energy replenishment [29,30].
Despite the significant advantages of IWPT, its implementation in complex underwater environments faces several critical technical challenges. These include substantial signal attenuation caused by the high electrical conductivity of seawater [31,32], system instability induced by hydrodynamic forces [33,34,35], and the pronounced sensitivity of electromagnetic coupling efficiency to environmental fluctuations [36]. Collectively, these factors impose substantial limitations on the continued development, reliable system integration, and large-scale deployment of underwater inductive wireless power transfer (UIWPT) technologies.
In response to these challenges, this paper offers a comprehensive review of recent developments and technological trends in UIWPT systems for AUV applications. The structure of this paper is as follows: Section 2 introduces the system architecture and operating principles of UIWPT, together with an analysis of energy loss mechanisms in underwater environments and their corresponding optimization strategies. Section 3 provides an in-depth review of key technical advancements, including magnetic coupler design, compensation circuit topologies, control strategies, simultaneous power and data transfer, and eddy current loss analysis. Section 4 discusses representative integration cases of UIWPT systems on AUV platforms and evaluates their performance. Section 5 focuses on the engineering application requirements and systematically examines the critical challenges encountered during real-world implementation. Section 6 discusses development trends in UIWPT technology to support continued innovation and facilitate its application in deep-sea operations. Finally, Section 7 presents the conclusions.

2. System Architecture and Power Loss Mechanisms of UIWPT

UIWPT technology has been increasingly applied to AUV energy replenishment. A thorough understanding of its system architecture and power loss mechanisms is critical for improving overall system performance and charging efficiency.

2.1. System Architecture and Operating Principles

The UIWPT system operates on the principle of Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction, facilitating wireless power transfer via electromagnetic coupling between the primary and secondary coils [37]. The system primarily comprises a power supply unit, high-frequency inverter, resonant compensation network, magnetic coupler, and rectification and filtering circuit. An illustrative schematic of the system architecture is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a typical UIWPT system’s architecture.
A detailed introduction to the core components of the UIWPT system and their functions is provided below:
  • Power Supply Unit: Serves as the system’s energy source, typically comprising high-energy-density battery packs that deliver a stable DC input;
  • High-Frequency Inverter [38]: Employs a full-bridge or half-bridge topology to convert DC power into high-frequency AC power;
  • Resonant Compensation Network: Includes compensation circuits on both the primary and secondary sides to improve power transfer efficiency and achieve zero phase angle (ZPA) operation;
  • Magnetic Coupler: Consists of a transmitting coil, a receiving coil, and an optional magnetic core, facilitating efficient electromagnetic coupling;
  • Rectification and Filtering Circuit: Located on the secondary side, this unit employs a full-bridge or half-bridge rectifier with a filtering circuit to convert the received AC power back into DC [39];
  • Control Unit: Dynamically regulates output voltage and current in response to variations in the coupling coefficient and load conditions [40]. Additionally, it provides flexible control over other system components as needed.
In a typical subsea charging scenario, where a seabed base station supplies power to an AUV, the system operates as follows: the DC power from the base station’s energy storage system is converted into high-frequency AC by the inverter. This AC power excites the transmitting coil via the resonant compensation network, generating an alternating magnetic field. The field propagates through the seawater medium and couples to the receiving coil within the magnetic coupler, where an AC voltage is induced on the secondary side. The induced AC power is then rectified and filtered to produce a stable DC output, which is used to charge the AUV’s on-board battery pack. The entire process enables fully contactless power transfer.

2.2. Power Loss Mechanisms and Optimization Strategies

The efficiency of UIWPT systems is a key performance indicator in underwater applications, where electrical energy is scarce and enhancing energy transfer efficiency is particularly essential. In AUV-based UIWPT systems, power losses primarily originate from the magnetic coupler, power electronic components, and eddy current effects. The distribution of these losses is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of loss distribution in the UIWPT system.

2.2.1. Losses in the Magnetic Coupler

Losses in the magnetic coupler represent the dominant source of energy dissipation in UIWPT systems and are generally categorized into coil losses and core losses, collectively accounting for nearly half of the total power losses [41].
Coil losses primarily arise from three mechanisms: skin effect, proximity effect, and DC resistance. The use of Litz wire, composed of multiple individually insulated strands, can substantially mitigate both the skin and proximity effects under high-frequency operation, making their impact negligible. Under such conditions, DC resistance becomes the predominant contributor to coil losses and can be expressed as follows:
P coil = I p r m s 2 R p dc + I s r m s 2 R s dc
In the equation, I p r m s and I s r m s represent the root mean square currents on the primary and secondary sides, respectively, while R p dc and R s dc denote the corresponding DC resistances of the primary and secondary coils. To minimize these losses, several strategies can be adopted. First, increasing the conductor’s cross-sectional area and optimizing the coil winding geometry can effectively reduce resistance. Second, designing an appropriate turns ratio between the primary and secondary windings [42], along with fine-tuning the resonant network parameters, helps to achieve optimal current distribution and minimize transmission loss. Furthermore, integrating robust thermal management techniques can improve overall system efficiency.
Core loss refers to the energy dissipated in magnetic core materials under alternating magnetic fields and consists of both hysteresis losses and eddy current losses [43]. It is commonly estimated using the Steinmetz equation:
P core = C m f α B max β
In the equation, C m denotes the material loss coefficient, which reflects the intrinsic dissipation characteristics of the magnetic core material. The exponents α and β represent the dependencies of core loss on frequency (f) and peak magnetic flux density ( B max ), respectively, and describe how the loss varies with operating conditions. Core loss can be effectively suppressed by optimizing the microstructure of the magnetic material to reduce C m and by appropriately adjusting the values of α and β [44]. For example, reducing α is particularly important in high-frequency applications, while minimizing β becomes critical in high-power operating scenarios. These key parameters are typically determined by least-squares fitting to experimental loss curves, enabling accurate prediction and optimal design of core losses [45].

2.2.2. Losses in Power Electronics

Power electronic losses primarily originate from switching events in the inverter, characteristics of the rectifier, and reactive power losses associated with the inductors and capacitors in the compensation network. To systematically reduce these losses, modern power electronic systems increasingly adopt wide-bandgap semiconductor devices such as silicon carbide (SiC) and gallium nitride (GaN). Their superior switching characteristics substantially reduce switching losses and improve overall inverter efficiency [46].
In the rectification stage, synchronous rectification technology, which is characterized by lower conduction voltage drop, is gradually replacing traditional Schottky diode solutions [47]. This approach is particularly effective in low-voltage, high-current applications, where it significantly reduces conduction losses. To minimize losses in the compensation network, a combination of strategies should be adopted. These include the use of air-core inductors to eliminate core losses, the selection of novel magnetic core materials with high permeability and low loss, and the adoption of TDK ceramic capacitors that exhibit high quality factors and excellent thermal stability. Collectively, these measures provide effective control over losses within the compensation network.

2.2.3. Losses in Eddy Current Paths

In practical marine environments, eddy current losses in UIWPT systems applied to AUVs primarily originate from the seawater medium and metallic shielding structures. Specifically, seawater-induced eddy current loss occurs because seawater, as a highly conductive medium, undergoes electromagnetic induction under the influence of alternating magnetic fields, thereby generating eddy currents that dissipate energy in the form of Joule heat. Considering that the seawater gap between most magnetic couplers can be approximated as a cylindrical structure, the eddy current loss under such geometric conditions can be analytically derived from Maxwell’s equations, combined with a planar circular coil model and volume integration in polar coordinates, and is expressed as follows:
P sea - aec ( f , h , r , σ ; n , I 1 , I 2 ) 2 ω 2 σ π h r 2 3 B 0 k 2 sinh ( k r ) k r 2
where
| B 0 | 2 = μ n 2 r 2 ( I 1 2 + I 2 2 ) , | k | = ω μ σ = 2 δ , δ = 2 ω μ σ
In the expression, h denotes the vertical distance between the transmitting and receiving coils, r is the coil radius, and σ is the electrical conductivity of seawater. ω = 2 π f represents the angular frequency, and μ is the magnetic permeability (approximately taken as μ 0 ). n is the number of turns, while I 1 and I 2 correspond to the currents in the transmitting and receiving coils, respectively. The term sinh ( k r ) / ( k r ) 2 serves as the expansion/skin-effect correction factor, whereas k 2 reflects the influence of seawater electrical parameters on field dispersion.
These results indicate that seawater-induced eddy current losses are proportional to the electrical conductivity of the medium and to the square of the operating frequency, and they are significantly influenced by coil parameters and current amplitudes. Therefore, optimizing the magnetic shielding structure [48] and appropriately controlling the operating frequency constitute effective approaches to mitigating seawater eddy current losses [49]. Given its complex mechanism and its unique role as a distinct loss component in underwater UIWPT systems, this topic will be further elaborated in Section 3.5.
Metallic eddy current losses primarily originate from the titanium or aluminum alloy hull of the AUV, as well as from the metallic enclosure components of the magnetic coupler. When alternating magnetic fields penetrate these metallic structures, induced parasitic eddy currents are generated within them, leading to energy dissipation. The corresponding expression can be written as follows:
P m e t a l a e c = π f μ σ S H 2 d s
In the equation, H denotes the magnetic field intensity, S denotes the cross-sectional area of the metallic shielding structure, and μ and σ denote the magnetic permeability and electrical conductivity of the metal material, respectively. To effectively suppress eddy current losses in metallic shielding structures, several optimization strategies can be implemented. These include replacing conventional metal enclosures with non-metallic composite materials (such as carbon fiber) to eliminate eddy current paths, optimizing the thickness of metallic layers and employing multi-layer shielding configurations to reduce the effective eddy current loop area [50], and reducing the system’s operating frequency to minimize high-frequency eddy current effects.

3. Key Technologies of UIWPT Systems

3.1. Structural Design of Magnetic Couplers

The design of the magnetic coupler in UIWPT systems plays a pivotal role in determining power transfer capability, transmission efficiency, and magnetic field distribution. In the context of AUV applications, such design must not only meet conventional engineering standards but also address the unique challenges posed by the underwater environment. The major challenges and corresponding key design requirements can be summarized as follows:
  • Form Factor Conformity: The design of the magnetic coupler must fully account for the structural characteristics of AUVs, particularly their widely adopted streamlined configurations [51]. The geometry of the coupler should closely match the contour of the AUV to minimize hydrodynamic drag and avoid negative effects on its hydrodynamic performance [30];.
  • Misalignment Tolerance: Traditional wet-mate charging methods rely on mechanical components to achieve precise alignment, whereas UIWPT technology seeks to reduce dependence on exact docking. Positional shifts between the transmitter and receiver coils, caused by factors such as ocean currents, can significantly degrade overall system performance. Therefore, the magnetic coupler should be designed with a certain degree of misalignment tolerance to compensate for positional deviations within a defined spatial range and to ensure stable and efficient power transfer under complex marine conditions [52].
  • Eddy Current Loss Suppression: Eddy current losses in the seawater environment are among the main factors limiting energy transfer efficiency. In the design of the magnetic coupler, the gap between the primary and secondary sides should be minimized to concentrate the magnetic field and reduce its leakage into the surrounding seawater. Additionally, eddy current losses can be significantly reduced by optimizing the selection of magnetic materials and the geometric layout, thereby further improving overall energy efficiency [53];
  • EMC [54]: The magnetic fields generated during wireless power transfer may cause EMC with sensitive on-board electronic systems in the AUV, such as navigation units and sensors. To ensure EMC, the design must precisely control the magnetic field distribution through structural optimization and the use of effective shielding materials. This is essential for enhancing the overall safety and reliability of the system.
  • Miniaturization and Lightweight Design: Given the stringent constraints on volume and weight in AUV platforms, the magnetic coupler should be designed with a focus on miniaturization and weight reduction [55,56,57]. By selecting high-performance lightweight materials and optimizing structural parameters, the overall weight of the system can be significantly reduced, thereby enhancing the AUV’s mobility, endurance, and energy utilization efficiency.
The design of magnetic couplers is typically based on the docking configuration of the AUV. While certain AUVs are designed to dock with surface vessels or motherships, the most common application scenario is docking with subsea base stations. Currently, AUV-to-station docking methods are generally categorized into three types: capture-type [58,59], platform-type [60,61], and guided docking [62]. Among these, the guided docking approach utilizes a guide-shroud structure to achieve precise alignment, significantly reducing positional deviations during the docking process and thereby improving the overall success rate. This advantage has established guided docking as the mainstream solution, with most magnetic couplers developed around this configuration. Building on the design characteristics of the AUV-mounted magnetic coupler, the following section systematically reviews the current state of technological development in UIWPT magnetic coupling systems.
To enhance the comparability of different research results under non-uniform conditions, this paper introduces two standardized performance metrics, which are subsequently employed to compare the performance of different types of magnetic couplers. The first is the figure of merit (FoM), defined as follows:
FoM = η k h
where η denotes the transfer efficiency, k is the coupling coefficient, and h represents the gap between the primary and secondary magnetic couplers. This metric simultaneously accounts for system efficiency, coupling strength, and transfer distance, thereby serving as a comprehensive indicator for evaluating the overall performance of magnetic couplers.
The second metric is the rated power density (RPD), defined as follows:
RPD = P out W
where P out denotes the output power of the system and W is the weight of the magnetic coupler on the AUV side. This metric evaluates the power transfer capability of the magnetic coupler per unit mass, highlighting its engineering relevance and practicality.

3.1.1. Non-Standard Core Magnetic Couplers

Non-standard core magnetic couplers adopt specially designed irregular magnetic core geometries to accommodate the specific structural constraints of the system. This configuration is primarily used in wireless power transfer systems that involve docking between AUVs and surface vessels or submarines. Based on differences in mechanical fixation methods, non-standard core configurations can be further classified into two major categories: concave–convex interlocking and base-alignment type.
The concave–convex interlocking magnetic coupler achieves precise alignment and power transfer via plug-in engagement between the primary and secondary magnetic cores. This configuration effectively mitigates disturbances caused by marine environmental factors, such as ocean current fluctuations, thereby enhancing the stability and reliability of the coupling process.
An early design proposed in [63] introduced a conical magnetic coupler mounted at the bow of the AUV, which docked with the subsea charging station via an insertion-based interface. This structure demonstrated excellent adaptability to ocean current fluctuations and achieved high power transfer efficiency. A self-locking magnetic coupler was proposed in [64], in which specially angled cutouts on the side poles of the magnetic core were used to increase the contact area. The central post on the transmitting side inserts into a groove on the receiving side, forming a self-locking engagement. This design significantly reduced the structural weight on the AUV side and enhanced resistance to disturbances caused by ocean currents (Figure 3a). A semi-enclosed magnetic coupler was developed in [65], offering higher power transmission capacity while effectively reducing electromagnetic radiation leakage. A clamping mechanism integrated into the housing ensures secure mechanical engagement. However, as the structure is mounted externally on the AUV, it may compromise the streamlined design and increase hydrodynamic drag (Figure 3b).
Figure 3. Non-standard core magnetic couplers: (a) Zhou et al. [64]. (b) Cheng et al. [65]. (c) Sun et al. [49].
The base-alignment magnetic coupler emphasizes precise alignment between the bottom surfaces of the AUV-side and transmitter-side magnetic cores. This design conforms to the streamlined curvature of AUV hulls and typically requires auxiliary mechanical fixtures to ensure accurate positioning and stable fixation. Such a configuration significantly reduces magnetic leakage and improves power transfer efficiency.
Yan et al. [66] proposed a base-alignment magnetic coupler utilizing an EE-type magnetic core, in which the secondary and primary sides are positioned on the underside of the AUV and the subsea base station, respectively. The windings are arranged around the central magnetic limb, thereby improving the coupling coefficient and enhancing the power transfer capability of the system. In further research, Cai et al. [67] proposed an optimized ε -type magnetic core design, featuring a bottom surface with improved conformity to the curved profile of the AUV hull. Through parameter optimization and iterative refinement, simulation results under misalignment conditions demonstrated that the ε -type core exhibited significantly enhanced coupling performance compared to the conventional E-type core configuration. In addition, a study presented in [49] introduced an anchor-shaped magnetic core structure with an enlarged curved contact surface, significantly improving geometric conformity with the AUV hull. This design enhanced coupling performance and exhibited increased tolerance to angular misalignment (Figure 3c).
Table 1 presents a comparative analysis of the key parameters and performance metrics of UIWPT systems using non-standard core magnetic coupler designs, as reported in recent literature, and provides the corresponding FoM values. Despite their advantages, non-standard core magnetic coupler structures still encounter practical challenges, including limited conformity with the AUV’s external contours and constraints in the effective utilization of internal space, which constrain their wider adoption in system integration and engineering applications.
Table 1. Comparison of system parameters for non-standard core magnetic couplers.

3.1.2. Circumferential Magnetic Couplers

Circumferential magnetic couplers are designed and optimized based on guided docking configurations. On the AUV side, the magnetic coupling units are arranged circumferentially along the curved hull and installed within specific compartments. After docking, these units form uniform magnetic coupling with the corresponding magnetic coupling structure on the subsea base station. This configuration offers high tolerance to rotational misalignment. Based on structural form and design methodology, this type can be further categorized into two main subtypes: the solenoidal configuration and the arc-shaped coil configuration.
A coreless coaxial solenoidal magnetic coupler proposed by Lin et al. [68] achieves 360-degree misalignment tolerance through nested primary and secondary coils. However, this configuration exhibits limitations in both EMC and power transfer efficiency. In subsequent research, [51] introduced magnetic cores and a metallic shielding enclosure and further optimized the core dimensions as well as the spacing between the core and the shield (Figure 4a). These enhancements significantly improved the magnetic coupling efficiency and EMC of the system. In further work, [69,70] proposed a reconfigurable annular magnetic coupler with adjustable dimensions. The transmitter side consists of multiple movable arc segments that form a coaxial solenoidal configuration when unlocked. Once locked, the structure effectively reduces the gap between the primary and secondary coils, thereby enhancing overall magnetic coupling performance.
To address power fluctuations caused by rotational misalignment, Yu et al. [71] proposed a three-transmitter, single-receiver configuration. By implementing a segmented design with 120° phase differences, the system was able to maintain power fluctuations within 5.9% (Figure 4b). In addition, Liu [72] proposed a squirrel-cage structure featuring columnar magnetic cores, which are designed to conform to the streamlined hull of the AUV. By employing circumferentially symmetric windings, the design enhances the tolerance to both axial and rotational misalignments, while also satisfying the requirements for modularity and lightweight construction.
To enhance axial misalignment tolerance, Mostafa et al. [73] proposed a dual-solenoid split-type magnetic coupler. This design adopts co-directional current excitation and a shared magnetic core between the transmitting and receiving units. Compared to conventional coaxial solenoidal structures, it reduces the fluctuation of the coupling coefficient by 22% under an axial misalignment of 80 mm. Subsequently, Wang et al. [74] optimized the design by configuring the currents on the same-side coils to flow in the same direction, while those on the opposite-side coils flow in opposite directions. Nanocrystalline magnetic cores were embedded with each coil to enhance magnetic performance. Through multi-objective optimization, the system achieved mutual inductance fluctuation of less than 10% under ±100 mm axial misalignment and 360° rotational misalignment, with a power transfer efficiency exceeding 92% (Figure 4c).
To address the multidimensional misalignment challenges of AUVs under complex operating conditions, Xiong et al. [75] developed a configuration comprising dual coaxial split-type transmitting solenoids and a single receiving solenoid. Under combined misalignment conditions, including 50 mm axial offset, 25 mm air gap, and 15° rotational deviation, the system exhibited only a 4.83% variation in output power while maintaining an efficiency above 90%. To further enhance charging flexibility, Hasaba [76] designed a helical coil–encircling magnetic coupler. The transmitter consists of three serially connected coils, each with a diameter of 2 m and spaced 1 m apart. The receiving coil is wrapped around the outer surface of the AUV hull segment, enabling stable power transfer during low-speed transit within the transmitter coil array.
Kan et al. [77] proposed a three-phase wireless charging system comprising three symmetrically arranged transmitting and receiving units, aiming to reduce magnetic field interference affecting the central equipment. However, the system exhibits limited tolerance to rotational misalignment (Figure 4d). In [78], the triple-receiver configuration was optimized into a dual-receiver design with oppositely wound coil pairs, which significantly improved power stability within a rotational misalignment range of 120°. Subsequently, Yan et al. [79] further reduced the number of transmitters to two and designed a structure consisting of four arc-shaped receiver segments. Each segment consists of two layers of coils wound in opposite directions, wrapped around an arc-shaped ferrite core. By leveraging the principle of vertical magnetic flux decoupling, this design effectively improves transmission stability under conditions of rotational misalignment.
Building on this foundation, in [80], a receiving structure composed of six arc-shaped solenoids was developed, featuring four transmitter units arranged in decoupled pairs and a phase control strategy. This configuration significantly enhanced the system’s tolerance to both axial and rotational misalignments, achieving an output power fluctuation of less than 5% (Figure 4e). In subsequent research, a complementary magnetic field structure, consisting of a U-shaped bipolar transmitting coil and four unipolar arc-shaped receiving coils, was developed to maintain high output power stability under a rotational misalignment of 240 degrees [81]. In [82], the number of transmitters was expanded to eight, enabling efficient power transfer under full 360° rotational misalignment and varying load conditions (Figure 4f).
The arc-shaped coil magnetic coupler adopts an innovative spatial folded design to enable circumferential distribution along the AUV. This configuration maintains high coupling performance while significantly enhancing both EMC and misalignment tolerance. In [83,84], Mostafa proposed a fully circumferential, folded unipolar coil structure based on the Hall sensor principle. The design enables strong electromagnetic coupling and significantly reduces internal magnetic field leakage by employing an insertion-based docking mechanism on the secondary side. This design exhibits significant advantages over traditional coaxial solenoidal configurations.
A magnetic coupler tolerant to rotational misalignment with adjustable geometry was developed in [85], providing adaptability to AUVs of various sizes and offering high compatibility. Each of the transmitting and receiving units was composed of four arc-shaped coils connected in series. This design was later optimized into a dual-layer magnetic coupler on the receiving side, where each layer comprised four arc-shaped coils with a 45 phase offset between them. Within a full 360° rotational range, the improved structure demonstrated high angular misalignment tolerance, maintaining stable output power and high transmission efficiency [86].
Figure 4. Circumferential magnetic couplers: (a) Liu et al. [51]. (b) Yu et al. [71]. (c) Wang et al. [74]. (d) Kan et al. [77]. (e) Yan et al. [80]. (f) Chen et al. [81,82].
The system parameters of various types of circumferentially distributed magnetic couplers are compared, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Comparison of system parameters for circumferential magnetic couplers.

3.1.3. Locally Distributed Magnetic Couplers

Locally distributed magnetic couplers are also developed based on guided docking principles. On the AUV side, the coil configuration is non-circumferential and is optimized for integration with specific hull regions. Based on the integration approach with the AUV hull, magnetic couplers can be classified into the conformal type, which aligns with the AUV’s curved surface, and the compact space-efficient type, which fits within the internal cabin. Since AUV are structurally designed to minimize roll, and the underwater docking station provides stable attitude constraints during docking, the system’s tolerance for rotational misalignment is significantly reduced. Compared with circumferentially distributed structures, locally distributed designs enable effective power transfer while reducing size and weight, and they achieve higher power density. Moreover, this configuration reduces magnetic field interference at the center of the AUV, thereby improving EMC.
Xia et al. [87] proposed an asymmetric magnetic coupling configuration, consisting of a full circumferential solenoidal coil on the transmitter side and a locally distributed solenoidal coil on the receiver side. Compared with the conventional coaxial solenoidal coil, this configuration offers improved magnetic field convergence and reduced structural weight (Figure 5a). Furthermore, Cai [88] proposed a magnetic coupler using partially curved solenoidal coils to suppress EMC that affects the AUV’s internal electronic systems. In addition, the adoption of Fe-based nanocrystalline magnetic cores significantly reduces the system weight. Wang et al. [54] proposed an arc-shaped magnetic coupler, designed to conform precisely to the curved surface of the AUV hull. By optimizing design parameters via finite element analysis (FEA), the magnetic flux density at the AUV center was significantly reduced. Moreover, a quantitative loss analysis was conducted, providing a foundation for further structural optimization (Figure 5b). Subsequent studies optimized the magnetic core structure into a distributed ferrite configuration and applied a genetic algorithm to optimize key coil parameters such as the number of turns and coil width (Figure 5c). This approach achieved maximum structural weight reduction while maintaining a high magnetic coupling coefficient [89].
Figure 5. Locally distributed magnetic couplers: (a) Xia et al. [87]. (b) Wang et al. [54]. (c) Lin et al. [89]. (d) Tang et al. [90]. (e) Qiao et al. [55]. (f) Cai et al. [57].
With arc-shaped transmitting coils that conform to the AUV’s curved hull now widely adopted, structural innovation on the receiver side has increasingly become a research focus. A dual-channel decoupled receiver, proposed in [90], integrates inner and outer reverse-bending coils with an external dual-solenoid structure, maintaining voltage fluctuation within 6% under a wide rotational misalignment of 50° and demonstrating excellent offset resistance (Figure 5d). Another study introduced an H-shaped ferrite core configuration, where the receiving coil is wound around vertically oriented magnetic cores [55]. This structure significantly enhances vertical magnetic flux coupling efficiency and exhibits better suitability for miniaturized and lightweight system designs compared to conventional arc-shaped configurations (Figure 5e). Building upon this, Wang et al. [91] further replaced the upper and lower sections of the H-shaped ferrite core with flexible magnetic materials to enhance structural bendability. Under conditions of 30° rotational misalignment and 30 mm axial offset, the design achieves mutual inductance fluctuation of less than 10% while also improving power density and significantly enhancing transmission stability.
To examine the performance differences between monopolar and bipolar structures, Yan et al. [92] conducted comparative experiments and demonstrated that although the bipolar structure is marginally heavier, it exhibits significantly lower levels of electromagnetic radiation than its monopolar counterpart, offering a clear advantage in minimizing interference with sensitive on-board equipment in AUVs. In addition, Zhao et al. [93] proposed a design in which the receiving side employs a curved receiving coil, while the transmitting side adopts a distributed forward-series configuration. A miniature internal compensation coil is integrated to enhance magnetic field uniformity, and the use of an arrayed ferrite core configuration effectively reduces the system’s overall weight. This design enables stable power transfer under multi-dimensional misalignment conditions.
The compact space-efficient magnetic coupler is exemplified by a receiving-end design proposed by Cai’s group, featuring an I-shaped ferrite core combined with a solenoidal coil. This miniaturized and structurally compact configuration provides a robust foundation for subsequent research and optimization. Building upon this receiving-end configuration, Cai’s team achieved further performance improvements through innovative transmitting-side designs. In [57], the bipolar arc-shaped transmitting coils are arranged with a centrally symmetric layout to maximize the coupling area, exhibiting good structural compatibility (Figure 5f). The double-layer arc-shaped coil employs a combination of three lower-layer coils and four upper-layer coils wound in an interlayer series-opposing manner. When coupled with precise excitation timing control, it generates a constant-amplitude traveling magnetic field with excellent tolerance to both axial and rotational misalignments [94]. The four-unit crossed transmitter, proposed in [95,96], operates in coordination with a dual-channel orthogonally decoupled receiver through a two-phase orthogonal coil array. The resulting large-area uniform magnetic field significantly improves the system’s misalignment tolerance. The curved four-transmitter scheme utilizes a paired arrangement of three equivalent sets of DD coils, combined with a two-phase orthogonal receiver design based on the sine–cosine coupling superposition principle. By employing hollow ferrite cores, the system achieves a weight reduction of 440g while maintaining excellent misalignment tolerance [97].
A comparison of different designs of locally distributed magnetic couplers is presented in Table 3. Given that such configurations emphasize lightweight characteristics on the AUV side, the RPD is also included to more intuitively reflect their performance advantages under weight-reduction constraints.
Table 3. Comparison of system parameters for locally distributed magnetic couplers.

3.1.4. Planar Coil Magnetic Couplers

Planar coil magnetic couplers are characterized by their flattened structure and high spatial adaptability and are widely used in UIWPT systems for AUVs. They reduce the structural complexity of the AUV and demonstrate excellent adaptability across diverse docking scenarios, including platform-based and guided configurations.
In terms of structural optimization, Li et al. [98] developed a tank-shaped planar magnetic coupler specifically designed for 4000-meter deep-sea conditions. Experimental results confirmed its magnetic coupling performance under high hydrostatic pressure and axial misalignment, providing valuable guidance for the selection of enclosure materials and mechanical layout in deep-sea applications. Based on the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), Liang et al. [99] conducted multi-objective optimization of planar coil design parameters for a frame-type AUV, thereby improving the system’s robustness to positional misalignments (Figure 6a). In [100], a coreless circular planar coil is used at the receiving end, while the transmitting side employs an inner–outer series-connected coil structure integrated with ferrite cores. This design effectively improves the uniformity of the magnetic field and enhances energy transfer efficiency, thereby increasing the system’s misalignment tolerance.
The platform-based docking method enhances the spatial adaptability and robustness of autonomous AUV charging. In [101], an omnidirectional charging platform was developed, featuring an arrayed planar transmitting coil system with an optimized spatial layout to support high-tolerance docking (Figure 6b). This system is further integrated with an electromagnetic anchoring mechanism to ensure accurate multi-dimensional positioning. To improve docking accuracy and system intelligence, SLAM-based navigation is combined with a visual servo docking system. By recognizing specific patterns on the platform, the system enables autonomous high-precision localization of the AUV, as demonstrated in [60]. In [102], a transmitting-end structure combining a raised annular coil and a coaxial central coil is proposed to improve platform generality and compatibility (Figure 6c). Meanwhile, a second-order Lagrangian-based nonlinear optimization algorithm is employed to optimize magnetic field strength and distribution uniformity. In addition, Cai et al. [103] integrated the advantages of circular and square coils by constructing a racetrack-shaped coil array. Utilizing a “DDQ” configuration, the system enables simultaneous multi-payload charging, thereby significantly enhancing platform operational efficiency (Figure 6d).
In recent years, many researchers have investigated extended configurations of planar coil-type magnetic couplers. Wen et al. [52] vertically embedded a dual-layer planar spiral coil into a specific cabin section of the AUV. Through guided docking with a solenoidal transmitter coil on the underwater base station, the system achieves stable coupling performance, effectively mitigating output fluctuations caused by axial misalignment. In [104], a dual-transmitter, single-receiver planar spiral coil structure was adopted. The receiving coil is mounted on the outer surface of the AUV stern and was magnetically aligned with the center of the dual transmitter coils during docking. This configuration reduces eddy current losses while maintaining stable power output and high transfer efficiency. In a more advanced study reported in [53], the planar spiral receiving coil was embedded into the AUV stern fin, while the transmitting coil was arranged in a solenoidal configuration to form a closed-loop magnetic field. This design not only significantly reduces electromagnetic leakage but also achieves overall system weight reduction through a coreless configuration.
Three-dimensional omnidirectional wireless power transfer systems for underwater applications have increasingly attracted research attention. In [105], the receiving side employs a conventional planar spiral coil, whereas the transmitting side features a spherical coil configuration composed of three mutually orthogonal circular loops. This design ensures non-interference among energy transfer channels, making it suitable for multi-directional and spatially distributed power delivery scenarios. Another study, reported in [106], utilizes an array of three orthogonally arranged square coils to achieve orientation-independent parallel power transfer to multiple AUVs (Figure 6e). Although such systems offer high spatial flexibility and relaxed docking accuracy requirements, improvements in power density and transmission efficiency are still needed.
Figure 6. Planar coil magnetic couplers: (a) Liang et al. [99]. (b) Yang et al. [101]. (c) Lyu et al. [102]. (d) Cai et al. [103]. (e) Zhang et al. [106].
In Table 4, the system parameters of planar coil-type magnetic coupler designs reported in the literature are systematically compared.
Table 4. Comparison of system parameters for planar coil magnetic couplers.

3.2. Application of Compensation Topologies

In UIWPT systems, the topology of the resonant compensation network plays a vital role in shaping overall system performance [107]. Accurate tuning of capacitance and inductance parameters enables the system to achieve the following key functions:
  • Facilitating dynamic reactive power compensation to improve energy efficiency;
  • Mitigating electrical stress on power devices to ensure reliable long-term operation;
  • Maintaining stable CC/CV output under varying loads;
  • Enabling accurate zero-voltage switching(ZVS)/zero-current switching (ZCS) operation to reduce switching losses and thermal impact.
Therefore, in practical applications, the selection of a compensation topology must comprehensively account for multiple factors, including operating frequency characteristics, load variation range, current waveform distortion, and the requirements for achieving soft-switching conditions [108]. Currently, compensation topologies in UIWPT systems are broadly categorized into low-order and high-order types. In addition, a variety of specialized topologies have been developed to address diverse application demands. The following presents a systematic analysis of the characteristics, application scenarios, and recent research advances in these compensation topologies, along with a comparative evaluation of their performance features.

3.2.1. Low-Order Compensation Topologies

Low-order compensation topologies are widely employed in UIWPT systems owing to their structural simplicity and cost-effectiveness. This category mainly comprises four fundamental configurations: series–series (SS), series–parallel (SP), parallel–series (PS), and parallel–parallel (PP), as illustrated in Figure 7.
Figure 7. Low-order compensation topologies: (a) SS. (b) SP. (c) PS. (d) PP.
The series–series (SS) topology offers substantial advantages in AUV wireless charging applications, as its resonant frequency remains unaffected by variations in coupling coefficient and load [76,88,93]. Thanks to its structural simplicity, it reliably delivers constant current (CC) output, making it particularly suitable for battery charging applications. However, under light-load or no-load conditions, excessive current may circulate on the primary side, causing abnormal voltage rise and elevated current stress, which may ultimately damage power switching devices. Therefore, the SS topology is better suited to high-power circuit architectures that employ advanced control techniques.
The series–parallel (SP) topology demonstrates enhanced stability under varying load conditions, rendering it particularly suitable for complex and dynamic load environments [64,87]. However, when the receiving side is open-circuited, the primary side may display resonant short-circuit behavior, thus requiring reliable current-limiting protection circuits. As reported in [68], comparative studies reveal that the SP topology offers markedly improved output voltage stability compared to the SS topology under dynamic load conditions.
The parallel–series (PS) topology offers high transmission efficiency and favorable power factor characteristics under conditions of low coupling coefficient and wide load variation [109]. However, it necessitates a CC source input to suppress voltage transients, thereby partially constraining its practical deployment.
In contrast, the parallel–parallel (PP) topology is infrequently adopted in practical engineering applications due to multiple technical constraints, including poor power factor, excessive secondary-side voltage, and stringent current source requirements [107].

3.2.2. High-Order Compensation Topologies

Conventional low-order resonant networks possess inherent limitations when applied to specific operational scenarios. High-order compensation topologies, through the integration of additional resonant components, offer substantial improvements in system performance and robustness. In recent years, such topologies have attracted growing interest and have been increasingly applied in UIWPT systems for AUVs. Miniaturization and lightweight construction remain critical design objectives in the development of AUV wireless charging systems. Given the stringent volume and weight constraints of AUV platforms, topological configurations with simplified secondary-side structures are generally regarded as more practical. Due to their relatively complex secondary-side configurations, S-LCC and P-LCC compensation topologies have limited applicability in UIWPT systems for AUVs.
By comparison, the LCC-S and LCC-P topologies exhibit superior weight reduction performance in AUV applications. Among these, the LCC-S topology has emerged as a mainstream solution in contemporary AUV wireless charging systems due to its compact structure and high operational stability. Notably, an optimized LCC-P topology can achieve performance comparable to that of the standard LCC configuration while significantly reducing voltage and current stress on switching devices. Using a CC operation with optimal efficiency as the design objective, Qiao et al. [110] developed a nonlinear programming model and employed a genetic algorithm to optimize system parameters. The proposed system achieved an output power of 802.3 W and a transmission efficiency of 91.12% under seawater conditions.
The LCC–LCC topology provides high design flexibility, enabling effective suppression of inverter current stress while enhancing misalignment tolerance and load variation. However, its requirement for numerous compensation components increases system cost and physical volume. Consequently, this topology is mainly employed in specialized scenarios, such as bidirectional charging for AUVs. Yan et al. [92] demonstrated via comparative analysis that, under identical operating conditions, the LCC–LCC topology achieves transmission efficiency comparable to that of the SS topology while producing coil current waveforms closer to an ideal sine wave, thereby offering significantly improved waveform quality. Figure 8 presents commonly used high-order compensation topologies in AUV-based UIWPT systems.
Figure 8. High-order compensation topologies: (a) LCC-S. (b) LCC-P. (c) LCC-LCC.

3.2.3. Single-Sided Compensation Topologies

Single-sided compensation topologies can be divided into two main types based on the configuration of resonant components: primary-side uncompensated and secondary-side uncompensated structures. By selectively omitting the resonant network on one side, these topologies simplify the overall system design while achieving performance optimization for specific application scenarios.
Primary-side uncompensated topologies, which omit resonant components on the transmitter side, significantly reduce system complexity and implementation cost. Among these, the N–S topology serves as a representative example. In [111], an open-loop control strategy without feedback was employed, demonstrating distinct advantages. This type of topology exhibits low sensitivity to load variations, effectively avoids frequency bifurcation, and greatly simplifies parameter design. These characteristics make it particularly suitable for operational environments with constrained underwater communication.
Secondary-side uncompensated topologies are primarily designed to meet the lightweight and compactness requirements of AUV systems. By eliminating compensation components on the receiving side, these configurations significantly reduce overall system weight and volume. The LCC–N topology employs an innovative switched-capacitor control strategy on the primary side, combined with precise parameter optimization, to achieve stable output current under varying coupling coefficients and load conditions [112]. Notably, the LLC–N topology proposed in [113] combines fundamental harmonic analysis with time-domain analysis to optimize primary-side circuit parameters. This approach effectively mitigates current stress and significantly enhances overall system reliability.

3.2.4. Reconfigurable and Hybrid Compensation Topologies

In response to the challenges posed by increasingly complex and dynamic operating environments, reconfigurable and hybrid compensation topologies have undergone notable advancements in recent years. These configurations enhance system adaptability and performance by enabling real-time structural reconfiguration or synergistic operation of multiple compensation schemes.
In the domain of reconfigurable topologies, Li et al. [114] proposed a topology-switching strategy between the LCC and π -type networks, utilizing an impedance self-adaptive tuning mechanism. Under conditions of low coupling efficiency and reduced battery voltage, this approach achieves a 1.7-fold improvement in power transfer capability compared to the conventional LCC–LCC topology, with system efficiency reaching 93.1%. Another noteworthy study, presented in [115], realized dynamic reconfiguration between SS and SP topologies via a switching matrix, enabling the system to flexibly alternate between power transfer and high-speed data communication modes.
Within the domain of hybrid compensation topologies, the dual LCC-S hybrid configuration enables self-adaptive operational mode switching through structural innovation, without requiring any active switching elements. Tang et al. [116] experimentally verified that the proposed topology maintains output voltage fluctuations within 8% over a wide coupling coefficient range of 0.2 to 0.6, achieves a sustained transmission efficiency exceeding 89% in air, and consistently operates under ZVS throughout the entire operating range. To address the specific requirements of multidimensional crossed magnetic couplers, Cai et al. [96] developed a dual LCC-S hybrid compensation strategy. By jointly optimizing the inductance parameters, the system’s fault tolerance under misalignment conditions was significantly enhanced.

3.3. Design of Control Strategies

Power control technologies in UIWPT systems constitute a core component for achieving stable operation, high-efficiency power transfer, and accurate power regulation [117]. However, the complex and dynamic nature of the marine environment presents several critical challenges to power control systems, primarily reflected in the following aspects:
  • Seawater imposes substantial attenuation of high-frequency electromagnetic waves, thereby degrading communication reliability;
  • Coil misalignment induced by ocean current disturbances significantly reduces magnetic coupling efficiency;
  • Parasitic effects introduced by the marine environment contribute to strong system nonlinearity;
  • Dynamic load variations during the charging process hinder stable power regulation.
From a system architecture perspective, control strategies in UIWPT systems can be classified along two key dimensions. Based on the control target, they include inverter modulation [118], compensation parameter tuning, rectifier control [39], and DC–DC converter regulation [119]. According to the control location, strategies can be further categorized as primary-side control [120], secondary-side control [121], dual-side independent control (without communication) [112], and dual-side coordinated control [122]. To address the unique challenges of AUV wireless charging systems, the following content systematically reviews recent research progress on control strategies, with a focus on practical engineering implementation.

3.3.1. Enhancement of Misalignment Tolerance

In marine environments, turbulence and ocean current often cause relative displacement between the primary and secondary coils, leading to dynamic variations in the coupling coefficient and fluctuations in reflected impedance, which significantly degrade power transfer performance. To mitigate this challenge, researchers have introduced a variety of innovative adaptive control strategies.
Fan et al. [123] optimized the pulse-width modulation (PWM) strategy and employed FPGA-based real-time inverter output control, effectively suppressing harmonic distortion. With a radial misalignment of 30%, the system’s transmission efficiency decreased by only 15%. In [124], a closed-loop CC control method incorporating variable secondary-side inductance was proposed. This approach achieved an efficiency of no less than 87% under a horizontal misalignment of 47% and a vertical misalignment of 140% while significantly reducing reliance on primary–secondary communication. Similarly, Luo et al. [125] developed an optimal efficiency model under variable gap conditions by dynamically adjusting the MOSFET duty cycle, demonstrating enhanced system reliability.
Fu et al. [126] proposed an intelligent control algorithm that integrates a backpropagation (BP) neural network with non-singular terminal sliding mode control (NTSMC) for multi-coil transmission systems. The method dynamically predicts the secondary coil position and optimizes the associated magnetic field distribution. Experimental results indicate that the system maintains a transmission efficiency exceeding 78.5% and exhibits high stability within an 80 mm misalignment range. To address rotational misalignment caused by ocean currents, Zhang et al. [127] proposed a mutual inductance estimation and angular identification algorithm based on primary-side current characteristics. This algorithm enables real-time feedback to the AUV master control system for attitude correction, thereby ensuring optimal power transfer operation.

3.3.2. Identification and Modeling of Dynamic Parameters

In UIWPT systems, the seawater environment introduces not only substantial eddy current losses but also a complex network of parasitic elements, such as stray capacitance and inductance. These factors pose significant challenges to the accuracy of conventional modeling methods in representing the system’s dynamic behavior. Meanwhile, the high attenuation of underwater communication restricts real-time parameter exchange between the primary and secondary sides, making single-sided parameter identification essential for precise control.
For system modeling, Xia et al. [128] developed a data-driven approach based on a simplified refined instrumental variable algorithm, integrated with model predictive control (MPC). This method significantly improves the system’s dynamic response and outperforms conventional PID control under varying operating conditions. In [129], a Buck–Boost converter was implemented on the secondary side, and a multi-strategy nonlinear recursive instrumental matrix estimation (RIME) algorithm was employed to dynamically identify the mutual inductance and load parameters, achieving relative errors below 1% and 6.8%, respectively.
In [130], an improved particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was proposed for LCC-S-based high-order compensated UIWPT systems. Under three-dimensional misalignment and dynamic load variations, the algorithm achieved mutual inductance identification error within 2.5% and maintained output power fluctuations below 5%. In addition, Liu [131] conducted an in-depth investigation into the influence of seawater-induced eddy current effects on system modeling and proposed a multi-parameter joint identification strategy that accounts for key variables such as mutual inductance, load resistance, and stray components. In [132], the multi-parameter identification problem was formulated as an objective function optimization task. A weighted-adjusted adaptive moment estimation (Adam-W) algorithm was employed to enable dynamic parameter identification using only primary-side information, providing an effective solution for control in non-communication scenarios.
The integration of machine learning techniques has brought notable progress in parameter identification. Orekan et al. [133] proposed a method for dynamically adjusting DC–DC converter parameters through real-time estimation of the secondary side coupling coefficient. Under misalignment conditions, this approach maintains a transmission efficiency above 85%. These innovative approaches effectively address the challenges of system modeling and parameter identification in marine environments, offering a reliable solution for power control in non-communication scenarios.

3.3.3. Maximum Efficiency Tracking and Optimization

The power transfer efficiency of UIWPT systems is influenced by various factors, including coil misalignment, eddy current loss, and load variability. Consequently, maximum efficiency point tracking (MEPT) and system-wide efficiency optimization have emerged as critical areas of research [134].
Wang et al. [135] implemented a variable-step perturb-and-observe algorithm on the primary side to perform power factor correction (PFC) and achieve MEPT. In combination with a semi-active rectifier combined with PI-based control on the secondary side, the system supports constant-current charging without requiring a communication link, thereby significantly simplifying the overall architecture. Zheng et al. [122] proposed an adaptive frequency tracking control (AFTC) technique that dynamically adjusts the operating frequency to match the system’s resonant frequency, thereby maintaining continuous operation at the maximum efficiency point.
To optimize system efficiency under dynamic operating conditions, Zheng [136] integrated neural networks with PID control to implement MEPT based on the learned optimal mapping between output voltage and coupling coefficient. By enabling real-time adaptive regulation of the DC–DC converter, the system maintains high energy transfer efficiency despite variations in load and coupling conditions. In [137], spiral-structured negative permeability metamaterials were incorporated into the system alongside a Buck–Boost impedance converter and an optimal impedance tracking strategy, thereby effectively minimizing reactive power loss.
Li [112] proposed a hybrid control strategy combining switched-capacitor (SCC) technology with frequency modulation for the LCC-N compensation topology. The system demonstrated superior performance, maintaining output current fluctuation within 4.47% and achieving an efficiency greater than 87% across a wide coupling coefficient range (0.3–0.54). Similarly, Zhang et al. [85] developed a dynamically tuned SCC technique capable of adaptively matching varying self-inductance values, offering an innovative solution for highly compatible AUV charging platforms. In addition, by optimizing the secondary-side compensation parameters and phase-shift control, Wang [138] effectively reduced eddy current loss, resulting in a 4–5% improvement in overall system efficiency.

3.3.4. Regulation of Power Output and Battery Charging

To meet the charging requirements of AUV lithium battery packs, UIWPT systems must overcome the challenge of output stability under dynamic load conditions and implement a dual-stage constant current–constant voltage (CC–CV) charging strategy in accordance with the electrochemical characteristics of the battery. In recent years, several notable technological advances have been achieved in this area.
For output stabilization, Yang et al. [139] implemented a high-power-density boost switched-capacitor (SC) converter on the secondary side, combined with a nonlinear voltage-oriented one-cycle control (VOCC) technique, which effectively suppresses input voltage fluctuations and load disturbances in real time. In the context of dual-side LCC compensation networks, Siroos et al. [140] conducted a comparative study of different control strategies. The results indicate that the DC–DC converter-based approach provides superior output voltage stability and minimal fluctuation amplitude across a wide range of coupling coefficients and power levels, outperforming both PWM-controlled inverters and Z-source converters.
For battery charging management, Zheng [122] proposed a voltage–current dual-loop control architecture based on a Buck converter, enabling seamless transitions between constant-current (CC) and constant-voltage (CV) charging modes. In [141], a cooperative control scheme was developed by combining resonant frequency tracking with digital phase-locked loop (PLL) phase-shift control. By utilizing wireless communication to transmit electrical parameters, the system dynamically adjusts the phase-shift angle to maintain constant-current and constant-voltage output. Under step changes in load, this method achieves a 5% improvement in system efficiency. These technological advancements not only improve energy transfer stability under dynamic load conditions but also offer a new approach to the integrated design of AUV energy management systems.

3.4. Implementation of Simultaneous Power and Data Transfer

During wireless power transfer operations, AUVs are required to simultaneously support multiple modes of data communications, including charging control feedback, task command exchange, and mission data transmission [142]. Stable and efficient communication between the AUV and the underwater base station is a fundamental prerequisite for realizing a closed-loop control architecture in UIWPT systems. Traditionally, power and data transfer have been implemented using wet-mate connectors and dedicated electro-optical hybrid cables [143]. However, with the growing deployment of UIWPT technologies, ensuring reliable and high-speed data transmission in complex underwater environments has become a critical technical challenge [144].
Contemporary underwater wireless communication technologies mainly include acoustic [145], optical [146,147], radio frequency (RF) [148,149], and the emerging MI communication. A performance comparison of these methods is provided in Table 5. The first three approaches typically require dedicated wireless communication modules to enable data transmission. In contrast, MI communication enables the simultaneous transmission of power and data, offering advantages in compact integration, reduced communication latency, and improved environmental adaptability. These features make it particularly suitable for complex underwater operations involving AUVs. Based on the coil configuration for data transmission, MI communication systems are generally classified into two categories: decoupled architectures employing independent coils and multiplexed architectures that utilize shared coils for both power and data. Each architecture offers distinct advantages in system integration and is tailored to different underwater application scenarios.
Table 5. Performance comparison of underwater wireless communication methods.

3.4.1. Dedicated Wireless Communication Systems

As the dominant method for long-range underwater transmission, acoustic communication utilizes the favorable propagation characteristics of sound waves in water, playing an irreplaceable role in extended-range AUV positioning and cooperative operations. A typical Ultra-Short Baseline (USBL) positioning system enables precise relative localization using acoustic signals, but its limited inherent bandwidth constrains its effectiveness in high-frequency control tasks and large-volume data transmission [150,151]. Guida et al. [22] proposed an acoustically integrated simultaneous data and power transfer system, incorporating a bidirectional acoustic modem to enable coordinated transmission of communication and ultrasonic wireless power, offering a novel energy solution for distributed underwater sensor networks. However, due to the inherently low efficiency of ultrasonic energy transfer, this technology remains at an exploratory stage with restricted practical adoption.
Optical communication technology, known for ultra-high data rates and extremely low latency, offers an ideal solution for short-range underwater communication. Based on this technology, Pontbriand [152] achieved full-duplex communication between AUVs and seafloor nodes over distances of up to 150 m, with data rates reaching 10 Mbps, while near-field transmission within 5 m exceeded 400 Mbps and required less stringent directional alignment. Visible Light Communication (VLC), as an emerging technology, shows significant promise in interference resistance and device miniaturization due to the unique advantages of LED light sources [153]. However, VLC requires a highly linear transmission path and is highly sensitive to water turbidity and ambient light interference, which greatly compromises its reliability in complex underwater environments.
RF communication technology supports high-speed data transmission using standard protocols such as Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, and it has been widely investigated for underwater applications. However, it faces major limitations due to the high conductivity of seawater, which causes severe attenuation of electromagnetic signals, especially in high-frequency bands. Granger et al. [154] conducted experiments on wireless charging and communication post AUV docking, integrating a Wi-Fi module with the magnetic coupler for power transfer. Communication was achieved using the 802.11b Wi-Fi protocol. In [155], a dual-RF adapter architecture combined with a glass fiber-reinforced polymer enclosure enabled data transmission at 3.5 Mbps across a 2 mm gap. In [144], the optimized antenna design of a 2.4 GHz wireless communication system enabled the AUV to uplink 700 MB of data at 3.1 MBps, even under a 7° roll angle. For deep-sea applications, Shi [156] proposed a non-intrusive docking structure that employs magnetic attachment and epoxy encapsulation. This design enabled simultaneous power and data transfer, delivering 130 W at 70% efficiency and supporting 73 Mbps full-duplex communication, offering a valuable reference for the practical implementation of underwater RF communication.

3.4.2. Decoupled Magnetic Induction Communication Systems

MI communication transmits data via alternating magnetic fields between compact coupled coils, typically operating in the MHz frequency range [157]. Compared to GHz-range RF signals, MI experiences significantly lower attenuation in water, offering improved communication stability and microsecond-level latency, effectively supporting real-time closed-loop control during AUV wireless charging.
The decoupled transmission scheme employing independent coils achieves electromagnetic decoupling of power and data channels through precise magnetic field orthogonalization. This configuration enables efficient and simultaneous transfer of power and data without signal interference. Unlike approaches that incorporate dedicated wireless communication modules, this method facilitates deep integration of power and data transfer at the system architecture level. It provides advantages such as improved spatial efficiency, enhanced synchronization accuracy, and greater environmental adaptability. Notably, this architecture represents one of the earliest solutions proposed for integrated MI communication.
In [158], an innovative overlapped coil structure was proposed, where a bipolar flux coil generates a horizontal magnetic field for power transfer, while a unipolar flux coil establishes a vertical magnetic field for data transmission. The receiver decouples the two channels via spatial magnetic field separation, enabling independent reception of power and data. This architecture significantly mitigates interference from the power channel on the communication signal and enhances system compactness and lightweight integration. Additionally, a band-stop filter is embedded in the data channel to suppress power crosstalk, thereby enabling high-quality full-duplex communication without compromising power transfer efficiency.
Da et al. [159] adopted a DDQ coil configuration, where two D-shaped coils handle power transfer and a dedicated Q coil supports data communication. Based on this architecture, a seawater-adapted communication system was developed. Experimental results show that the system can achieve Mbps-level data rates under high power transfer conditions, although full-duplex communication remains unrealized. Subsequent research extended this system to bidirectional power transfer scenarios, where pulse synchronization techniques were applied to optimize the phase alignment between forward and reverse power flow. In conjunction with PLL control, this method significantly reduced interference from the power channel to the data signal [160]. Notably, Xia et al. [128] proposed an alternative setup that utilizes DD coils for data transmission and assigns the Q coil for power delivery. However, due to limited magnetic coupling, the system exhibited relatively low data throughput.
To address interference from the power channel to the communication signal, Zhang [161] conducted an in-depth analysis of the magnetic field distribution of the DD coils and strategically positioned a circular data coil in a region of low field intensity while maintaining orthogonality with the power flux. This configuration enabled miniaturization of the communication unit and demonstrated strong resilience to axial misalignment, although the achievable data rate remains limited. To further enhance the isolation between power and data channels, Li et al. [162] proposed a hybrid magnetic induction–electric field coupling architecture in which power transfer is conducted via conventional inductive coupling, while data communication is achieved through single-capacitor-based electric field transmission. This hybrid architecture not only enables full-duplex communication but also significantly extends the effective transmission range, ensuring continuous information exchange throughout all phases of AUV charging—before, during, and after power transfer. In addition, the spherical orthogonal coil assembly designed in [163] achieved complete three-dimensional magnetic field decoupling, enabling fully independent transmission of power and data. This system was successfully applied to wireless energy supply and data collection between AUVs and distributed underwater sensor networks, demonstrating strong potential for complex subsea operations.
To compare the overall performance of different schemes under non-uniform experimental conditions, this paper defines a standardized performance metric termed the Communication Energy Efficiency Index (CEI), which is intended to jointly evaluate the capability of simultaneous power and data transfer. Its definition is given as follows:
C E I = η P out R 1000
In this expression, η denotes the power transfer efficiency, P out represents the output power, and R refers to the data transfer rate. The CEI value is positively correlated with these three parameters, and a higher value indicates superior overall performance in both power transfer and data transfer. In the following analysis, this metric will be employed to systematically evaluate and compare different schemes.
A parameter comparison of decoupled transfer systems using independent coils with the corresponding CEI values is presented in Table 6.
Table 6. Parameter comparison of decoupled transfer systems using independent coils.

3.4.3. Multiplexed Magnetic Induction Communication Systems

The multiplexed shared-coil transmission scheme enables simultaneous power and data transfer by superimposing high-frequency communication signals onto the power transfer coils. In contrast to decoupled transmission systems employing dedicated communication coils, this approach eliminates the need for dedicated communication coils, offering notable advantages in system integration, compactness, and weight reduction. Depending on different multiplexing methods and coil configuration, existing studies can be broadly divided into two categories: partial-coil multiplexing and single-coil time–frequency multiplexing.
The partial-coil multiplexing scheme typically utilizes a designated portion of the power transfer coil, such as the outermost or innermost winding, for data communication. This architecture integrates communication capabilities while preserving high power transfer efficiency; however, it requires precise coil alignment to ensure stable system performance. Wang et al. [164] proposed an innovative dual-sided LLCC compensation topology in which the data carrier is loaded onto the outermost turn of the power coil to facilitate full-duplex communication via frequency division multiplexing (FDM). By incorporating frequency shift keying (FSK), the system reduces voltage stress and improves both interference immunity and communication robustness. To further enhance spectral efficiency, Li [165] introduced orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), enabling high-speed full-duplex data transmission over a planar coil structure and significantly improving the system’s communication capacity.
Zeng et al. [166] designed a transmitting coil consisting of two oppositely wound spiral loops paired with a specially shaped arc-shaped receiving coil to generate a multidirectional magnetic field distribution. This configuration enables simultaneous power delivery and data feedback operations for multiple AUVs. A multi-objective genetic algorithm was utilized to optimize the parameters of the coupling structure, achieving a trade-off between transmission efficiency and system weight. In addition, the hybrid injection communication scheme based on the LCC-S topology achieves data injection via transformer coupling, demonstrating strong system compatibility.
For communication channel design, Li et al. [167] proposed a method for directly injecting and extracting information carriers at the tap point of the coupled coil. By eliminating the limitations of conventional resonant structures and employing minimum shift keying (MSK) modulation together with coherent demodulation, this approach simplifies system design while significantly enhancing bandwidth utilization and data throughput. In [168], an enhanced dual-channel full-duplex architecture was proposed, enabling priority-based transmission of control commands and sensing data by differentially injecting carriers at distinct positions along the coupling coil. The accompanying reduced-order high-precision model offered effective guidance for communication channel design, thereby enhancing the engineering applicability of the overall system. Table 7 summarizes the performance comparison of various partial-coil multiplexing schemes in shared-coil MI communication systems.
Table 7. Performance comparison of partial-coil multiplexing schemes in shared-coil MI communication.
The single-coil time–frequency multiplexing scheme enables simultaneous power and data transfer over a single coil via time-division multiplexing (TDM) or frequency-division multiplexing (FDM), thereby achieving a higher degree of system integration.
TDM enables the alternating transmission of power and data by precisely controlling switching devices. In [115], an intelligent switching control strategy is adopted to divide the system operation into three distinct modes: power transfer, low-speed handshake communication, and high-speed data feedback. To accommodate various communication requirements, the scheme employs amplitude shift keying (ASK) for bidirectional communication and OFDM for high-speed unidirectional data transmission. Similarly, Yang [169] realized time-domain complementary transmission of power and data signals by precisely controlling the switching sequence of transistors.
FDM enables simultaneous transmission of power and data over distinct frequency bands. Fukuda et al. [170] exploited the frequency-selective characteristics of a single coil, utilizing the low-frequency kHz band for efficient power transfer and the high-frequency MHz band for data communication. The feasibility of this approach was demonstrated in a 20 cm-thick seawater environment. Luo [171] proposed a frequency-division multiplexing scheme based on dual-LCC and dual-CLC compensation topologies, wherein the forward power wave serves as the information carrier. Through an innovative compensation network design, the scheme effectively mitigates interference between the power and data channels. By eliminating conventional components such as wave catchers and transformers, the scheme simplifies circuit design and significantly reduces system-level losses. When combined with a multi-objective optimization algorithm, this approach enables the coordinated optimization of multiple performance metrics across both power and data channels, offering a novel perspective for enhancing overall system performance. Table 8 summarizes a performance comparison of various single-coil time–frequency multiplexing schemes.
Table 8. Performance comparison of single-coil time–frequency multiplexing schemes in shared-coil MI communication.

3.5. Analysis of Seawater-Induced Eddy Current Losses

In recent years, research on seawater-induced eddy current losses has advanced considerably, evolving from fundamental mechanism investigations to modeling approaches, engineering suppression strategies, and multi-physics coupling analyses. This subsection provides a systematic review of the existing analytical methods, mitigation strategies, and future development trends with the aim of offering both theoretical insights and engineering references for the optimal design and underwater application of UIWPT systems.

3.5.1. Existing Analysis Methods

The current methods for analyzing eddy current losses primarily include numerical simulation, analytical modeling, and equivalent circuit representation. The advantages and limitations of each approach are summarized in Table 9.
Table 9. Comparison of advantages and limitations of eddy current loss analysis methods.
The finite element method (FEM), as a representative numerical simulation technique, enables direct visualization of the spatial distribution of eddy current losses. In [68], it was demonstrated that eddy current losses are predominantly concentrated in a specific region between the coils. However, this method is constrained by its high computational cost and the challenge of establishing quantitative relationships between system parameters and eddy current losses.
The analytical modeling method derives electromagnetic field solutions based on Maxwell’s equations, establishing an explicit mapping between magnetic field distribution and eddy current losses. The analytical model for coreless systems developed by Yan [172] reveals that eddy current losses are proportional to the square of both the operating frequency and the magnetic field strength. The analysis further indicates that when the resonant frequency exceeds 100 kHz or the lateral misalignment surpasses a critical threshold, eddy current losses rise sharply [173]. In addition, several studies have proposed analytical expressions for the additional self-resistance and eddy current mutual resistance of coils with arbitrary turns based on the Helmholtz equation. Although these models offer high applicability and accuracy under aligned conditions, predictive performance deteriorates significantly under misalignment [174]. Shafiei et al. [175] proposed a multi-objective analytical approach applicable to planar spiral and solenoidal coils, which effectively reduces computational complexity.
The equivalent circuit method simplifies the estimation of eddy current losses by introducing an equivalent eddy current impedance model. In [176,177], Z-parameter modeling was combined with electromagnetic analysis and two-port network theory to accurately predict eddy current losses in various conductive media. Lin et al. [178] further proposed an equivalent eddy current loss (EECL) model, which achieved a prediction error of only 2.16% compared to simulation results at 200 kHz, thereby significantly enhancing prediction accuracy. In addition, Zhang [179] successfully designed a UIWPT system based on the equivalent circuit method, featuring a 30 mm coil separation and an operating frequency of 107.1 kHz, and achieving a power transfer efficiency exceeding 90%. Other studies have modeled eddy current losses using two equivalent resistive components, proposing a framework applicable to both magnetic core systems and non-axisymmetric structures. The resulting circuit model is adaptable to coils of arbitrary shapes and indicates that increasing the coupling coefficient leads to a higher optimal operating frequency [180]. Li et al. [181] introduced equivalent self- and mutual resistances to represent eddy current losses and proposed a high-accuracy, general-purpose circuit model. This model does not require reparameterization under varying system conditions and maintains a prediction error below 10%.

3.5.2. Mitigation Strategies

The suppression of eddy current losses primarily focuses on operating frequency optimization [172], coil geometry design [182], and the implementation of magnetic shielding materials [183]. Operating frequency optimization is considered one of the most effective strategies for suppressing eddy current losses due to its direct influence on loss magnitude. When the operating frequency of a UIWPT system exceeds 100 kHz, eddy current losses increase sharply. Moreover, each operating condition corresponds to a specific optimal frequency, which is typically set above the system’s resonant frequency [178]. In [184], frequency optimization enabled a transmission efficiency exceeding 87% under long-distance power transfer conditions at 500 W. In addition, Luo et al. [185] pointed out that when the coil current is below 5 A, setting the operating frequency below 150 kHz can significantly suppress eddy current losses. Notably, determining the optimal frequency requires consideration of various factors, including seawater conductivity, coil spacing, turn density, coil dimensions, and misalignment conditions [186].
Coil structure optimization involves both geometric layout design and material selection. For example, a dual-transmitter, single-receiver planar spiral coil structure has been shown to significantly improve eddy current loss suppression [187]. In addition, the integration of magnetic shielding materials provides a promising approach to further enhance system performance.

3.5.3. Future Research Directions

Research on eddy current losses is steadily advancing, yet several key challenges remain unaddressed. Future studies should concentrate on the following promising directions, which have the potential to establish new theoretical foundations and technical pathways for effective eddy current loss mitigation.
  • Multiphysics Coupling Analysis: Current research primarily focuses on electromagnetic field analysis, whereas practical underwater applications often involve coupled thermal–fluid–structural interactions [188]. Future studies should incorporate multiphysics coupling models to analyze eddy current losses more accurately.
  • Accurate Calculation of Eddy Current Losses over Long Distances: Existing methods lack sufficient accuracy in calculating eddy current losses over long transmission distances beyond the centimeter scale. Sun [49] proposed a Maxwell equation-based approach that estimates losses by calculating energy dissipation per unit volume and applying approximate integration to derive the loss expression. Although this approach introduces notable innovations, its accuracy remains limited. Future work should focus on developing higher-precision models for long-distance loss estimation to support a broader range of application scenarios.
  • Multi-Objective Parameter Optimization: Eddy current losses do not occur in isolation but are influenced by multiple factors, including the coupling structure and operating frequency. Future research should develop multi-objective optimization methods that simultaneously consider system efficiency, transmission distance, and thermal effects to improve the overall performance of UIWPT systems.

4. Integration of UIWPT Systems with AUV Applications

In recent years, the integration of inductive wireless power transfer technology into AUV systems has made notable progress. In response to diverse application scenarios and system design requirements, researchers have developed various UIWPT systems. Through extensive experimental validation and preliminary real-world deployments, UIWPT technology has progressed from laboratory research toward engineering implementation. This section provides a systematic review and classification of current efforts to integrate UIWPT systems with AUVs, focusing on three key perspectives: marine environmental adaptability, docking configuration implementation, and universal system design. The aim is to provide meaningful references for future research and engineering practice.

4.1. Adaptability to Marine Environments

The marine environment exerts a substantial influence on the performance of UIWPT systems, often resulting in substantial discrepancies from theoretical model predictions. The guided seafloor docking station developed by the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) for the 21-inch Bluefin AUV was theoretically designed to deliver 1 kW of power at a depth of 4 km with an efficiency of 88% [189]. However, during a 12-m sea trial, the efficiency dropped significantly to 48% under an output power of 416 W. The substantial efficiency loss was primarily attributed to environmental factors such as seawater conductivity and temperature fluctuations. Through system-level optimization, Granger et al. [154] achieved a transmission power of 500 W with 75% efficiency in a controlled saline laboratory environment. In subsequent sea trials, the system achieved 450 W, with plans to further increase the output power to 1700 W.
In addition, a second-generation docking system developed by a research team at Zhejiang University integrated the wireless charging module directly into the AUV (Figure 9a), supporting constant-current and constant-voltage charging modes. During saline water tests, the system achieved an output power of 300 W, with an efficiency ranging from 63% to 77% [68]. The team further optimized the system and achieved 800 W power transfer with 85% efficiency during sea trials conducted in the South China Sea (Figure 9b). By optimizing the operating frequency to minimize energy dissipation during the AUV battery charging process, they reduced the efficiency deviation from tank test results to within 0.5%, demonstrating strong environmental adaptability [178].
Figure 9. UIWPT system integration into AUVs under marine environmental conditions: (a) Lin et al. [68]. (b) Lin et al. [178].

4.2. Implementation of Various Docking Configurations

Guided docking is exemplified by the resident hovering AUV and seafloor station developed by Cellula Robotics (Canada), which is equipped with an inductive charging system. However, detailed performance metrics have not yet been publicly disclosed [190]. Yoshida et al. [191] designed the coupling coils within a conical docking structure, achieving an output power of 1 kW with 75% efficiency across a seawater gap of several centimeters, thereby demonstrating favorable engineering feasibility. Similarly, Matsuda [192] developed a compact charging system employing infrared LEDs and photodiode-based positioning to effectively detect docking misalignment. The system achieved an efficiency of 70% at an output power of 188 W.
The Marine Bird AUV performs docking by employing a robotic arm to engage a V-shaped guide rail on the docking platform and has successfully demonstrated wireless charging at a depth of 15 m [193,194]. In contrast, dynamic floating docking provides enhanced adaptability to wave-induced disturbances. In [195], the developed system achieved an output power of 25 W with 65% efficiency across a 10 cm gap, demonstrating suitability for deployment in complex marine environments. Furthermore, the robotic fish-based power relay platform proposed in [196] utilizes an electromagnetically actuated magnetic disc to enable omnidirectional dynamic docking, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of mobile wireless power replenishment. Other studies have demonstrated wireless power transfer from a heavy-duty AUV to a lightweight counterpart, achieving stable power delivery of 450 W (15 A, 30 V), with reliable performance in humid and underwater environments [197].

4.3. Design of General-Purpose UIWPT Systems

To meet the charging demands of AUVs of varying sizes, researchers have proposed a range of general-purpose system design strategies aimed at enhancing cross-platform compatibility. A notable breakthrough was reported by Maguer et al. [198], who developed a highly compatible hockey puck-shaped coil system capable of delivering 500 W of power at 90% efficiency across a 10 mm saline gap. The system demonstrated high reliability during two weeks of continuous sea trials and showed potential for scaling up to 1 kW through coil size expansion.
The Odyssey II AUV employs an adaptive frequency system operating in the 65–80 kHz range, which automatically adjusts its operating frequency based on the docking gap. This serves as a valuable demonstration of general-purpose system design [199]. Additionally, the platform developed in [60] is compatible with AUVs docked at various positions, delivering output power in the range of 50–62 W with a consistent efficiency of 67%. Despite its strong compatibility, the system still requires further optimization with respect to coil losses and eddy current losses.

5. Key Challenges in the Development of UIWPT Technology

5.1. Exploration of Emerging Material Properties

The application of UIWPT systems in AUVs places stringent and multifaceted demands on material properties, including EMC, structural strength, and environmental durability. Although conventional metallic hull materials such as high-strength steel, aluminum alloys, and titanium alloys provide superior mechanical strength and pressure resistance, they are prone to substantial eddy current losses under alternating magnetic fields, thereby reducing the overall power efficiency of the UIWPT system. Non-metallic composite materials such as polyamides, glass fiber reinforced polymers, acrylic glass, and SiAlON ceramics [200] have emerged as promising candidates due to their excellent electrical insulation, lightweight characteristics, and corrosion resistance. However, their long-term structural reliability under deep-sea, high-pressure conditions has yet to be systematically validated.
Fe-based nanocrystalline magnetic cores are well-suited for the development of curved magnetic coupler structures owing to their high saturation magnetic flux density and superior mechanical flexibility [201,202]. However, they are prone to significant eddy current losses under high-frequency operating conditions. Although nanocrystallization annealing techniques can enhance electrical resistivity and thus mitigate eddy current losses [203], striking an optimal balance between resistivity and magnetic permeability remains a critical challenge.
In addition, superconducting materials offer near-ideal power transfer performance owing to their zero electrical resistance. However, the mechanisms underlying critical current degradation under deep-sea conditions characterized by low temperatures and high pressures remain poorly understood, thereby posing considerable uncertainty for real-world engineering deployment [137].

5.2. Multiphysics Coupling Disturbances in Marine Environments

The operation of UIWPT systems in the marine environment is subject to strong multiphysics coupling, including electromagnetic, thermal, and mechanical effects [188]. Among these factors, variations in seawater salinity are particularly critical [63]. Salinity directly determines the electrical conductivity of seawater, which can vary severalfold across regions, depths, and seasonal conditions. Such fluctuations markedly alter the level of eddy current losses and the spatial distribution of the magnetic field, thereby causing the transfer efficiency of the system to exhibit pronounced regional dependence and posing critical challenges to its adaptability for global deployment.
In addition to salinity variations, biofouling increases the coil spacing and weakens the magnetic coupling capability [204]. Extreme hydrostatic pressure in deep-sea environments may induce magnetostrictive effects, causing the degradation of magnetic core materials [98]. Furthermore, in high-power systems, encapsulation materials restrict heat dissipation, leading to local thermal accumulation and hotspot formation [205]. These effects accelerate the deterioration of insulation layers and magnetic materials, shorten device lifetime, and ultimately form critical bottlenecks limiting system reliability and large-scale engineering applications. At present, there is a lack of unified models capable of simultaneously characterizing the coupled electromagnetic, thermal, and mechanical effects, which results in significant limitations in performance prediction and reliability assessment under extreme marine conditions.

5.3. Limitations in EMC and Stealth Performance

The strong electromagnetic fields generated by the high-frequency operation of UIWPT systems can interfere with critical subsystems of AUVs, including inertial navigation, acoustic positioning, and weak magnetic sensing, thereby compromising control stability and positioning accuracy while potentially exposing platform locations, which is incompatible with stealth requirements in military applications [206]. Existing magnetic shielding materials suffer from inherent limitations in shielding efficiency, thickness constraints, and integration feasibility, making it difficult to simultaneously achieve high power transfer efficiency and EMC.
Although the ICNIRP guidelines specify that the magnetic field strength in sensitive regions should remain below 27 μ T [207], the near-field coupling conditions of UIWPT systems often exceed this threshold. At present, there are no dedicated EMC standards for underwater UIWPT, and only general specifications such as MIL-STD-461G can be referenced [208]. Insufficient EMC and stealth performance have thus emerged as critical bottlenecks restricting their engineering application.

5.4. Limited Misalignment Robustness of Magnetic Coupling Structures

Magnetic couplers employed in AUV wireless charging systems are highly vulnerable to multi-degree-of-freedom misalignments, including axial offsets, rotational displacements, and vertical air gaps, which significantly degrade power transmission efficiency. Existing compensation strategies have predominantly concentrated on optimizing magnetic structures, adaptively adjusting compensation topologies, or implementing dynamic control-based regulation. However, these standalone strategies remain inadequate for handling severe uniaxial misalignments or simultaneous multi-axis deviations. Establishing a multidimensional hybrid compensation mechanism represents a promising pathway to overcome the limited design degrees of freedom and ensure stable power delivery under diverse misalignment scenarios [80,209].

7. Conclusions

The rapid advancement of UIWPT technology presents a promising solution for achieving efficient, contactless energy replenishment in AUVs. This study provides a comprehensive review of the fundamental system architecture and energy dissipation mechanisms associated with UIWPT systems in underwater applications. The analysis highlights that enhancing magnetic coupler design, employing advanced functional materials, and incorporating high-performance power electronic components are key strategies for improving energy transfer efficiency.
At the technical level, this paper outlines key design considerations for magnetic coupler design, with a focus on structural adaptability, miniaturization, and weight reduction, and it classifies four representative configurations. For compensation topologies, this paper first introduces conventional low-order and high-order schemes and further explores the application potential of single-sided, reconfigurable, and hybrid schemes under specific operating conditions. In terms of control strategies, it reviews methods addressing misalignment tolerance, parameter identification, efficiency optimization, and output stability, highlighting recent innovations tailored to diverse operational scenarios. For simultaneous power and data transfer, MI communication is categorized into decoupled architectures with independent coils and multiplexed schemes utilizing shared coils, both offering advantages in system integration and communication reliability. Finally, this paper reviews current approaches for analyzing eddy current losses and recommends operating frequencies below 100 kHz, alongside coil structure and magnetic shielding optimization, to effectively reduce losses.
At the system integration level, this paper systematically reviews representative UIWPT applications in AUV platforms, focusing on environmental adaptability, docking configurations schemes, and general-purpose system design. It also identifies key engineering challenges impeding practical deployment, such as material property constraints, environmental disturbances, EMC concerns, and limited misalignment tolerance. Future research should advance in multiple directions, such as improving power transfer efficiency, increasing power density, and advancing system modularity and standardization, in order to facilitate the large-scale implementation of UIWPT systems in increasingly complex underwater environments.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Braginsky, B.; Baruch, A.; Guterman, H. Development of an autonomous surface vehicle capable of tracking autonomous underwater vehicles. Ocean Eng. 2020, 197, 106868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, X. Precision Fixed-Time Formation Control for Multi-AUV Systems with Full State Constraints. Mathematics 2025, 13, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Teeneti, C.R.; Truscott, T.T.; Beal, D.N.; Pantic, Z. Review of wireless charging systems for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2021, 46, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, X.; Shang, J.; Luo, Z.; Tang, L.; Zhang, X.; Li, J. Reviews of power systems and environmental energy conversion for unmanned underwater vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1958–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mendez, A.; Leo, T.J.; Herreros, M.A. Current state of technology of fuel cell power systems for autonomous underwater vehicles. Energies 2014, 7, 4676–4693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, X.; Sun, P.; Yang, S. A review of underwater radio energy transmission technology and its application. Trans. China Electrotech. Soc 2019, 34, 1559–1568. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradley, A.M.; Feezor, M.D.; Singh, H.; Sorrell, F.Y. Power systems for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2001, 26, 526–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, D.; Zhang, J.; Cui, S.; Bie, Z.; Chen, F.; Zhu, C. The state-of-the-arts of underwater wireless power transfer: A comprehensive review and new perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 189, 113910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stokey, R.; Allen, B.; Austin, T.; Goldsborough, R.; Forrester, N.; Purcell, M.; Von Alt, C. Enabling technologies for REMUS docking: An integral component of an autonomous ocean-sampling network. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2001, 26, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, J.; Yu, F.; He, B.; Soares, C.G. A review of underwater docking and charging technology for autonomous vehicles. Ocean Eng. 2024, 297, 117154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tefferi, M.; Ghassemi, M.; Calebrese, C.; Chen, Q.; Cao, Y. Characterizations of solid-liquid interface in a wet-mate subsea HVDC connector. J. Electrost. 2018, 94, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tefferi, M.; Ghassemi, M.; Calebrese, C.; Chen, Q.; Cao, Y. Correlation between current-voltage characteristics and DC field grading for dielectric liquid used in wet-mate DC connector. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Elect. Insul. 2018, 25, 1668–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lu, X.; Wang, P.; Niyato, D.; Kim, D.I.; Han, Z. Wireless charging technologies: Fundamentals, standards, and network applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2016, 18, 1413–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sagar, A.; Kashyap, A.; Nasab, M.A.; Padmanaban, S.; Bertoluzzo, M.; Kumar, A.; Blaabjerg, F. A comprehensive review of the recent development of wireless power transfer technologies for electric vehicle charging systems. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 83703–83751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Amjad, M.; Farooq-i Azam, M.; Ni, Q.; Dong, M.; Ansari, E.A. Wireless charging systems for electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 167, 112730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Panchal, C.; Stegen, S.; Lu, J. Review of static and dynamic wireless electric vehicle charging system. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2018, 21, 922–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huda, S.A.; Arafat, M.Y.; Moh, S. Wireless power transfer in wirelessly powered sensor networks: A review of recent progress. Sensors 2022, 22, 2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bhatia, A.; Hanna, J.; Stuart, T.; Kasper, K.A.; Clausen, D.M.; Gutruf, P. Wireless battery-free and fully implantable organ interfaces. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 2205–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, S.; Cui, Q.; Abiri, P.; Roustaei, M.; Zhu, E.; Li, Y.R.; Wang, K.; Duarte, S.; Yang, L.; Ebrahimi, R.; et al. A self-assembled implantable microtubular pacemaker for wireless cardiac electrotherapy. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadj0540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, Y.; Liang, W.; Xu, W. Charging utility maximization in wireless rechargeable sensor networks by charging multiple sensors simultaneously. IEEE ACM Transactions Netw. 2018, 26, 1591–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alabsi, A.; Hawbani, A.; Wang, X.; Al-Dubai, A.; Hu, J.; Aziz, S.A.; Kumar, S.; Zhao, L.; Shvetsov, A.V.; Alsamhi, S.H. Wireless power transfer technologies, applications, and future trends: A review. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Comput. 2025, 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guida, R.; Demirors, E.; Dave, N.; Melodia, T. Underwater ultrasonic wireless power transfer: A battery-less platform for the internet of underwater things. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 2022, 21, 1861–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jin, K.; Zhou, W. Wireless laser power transmission: A review of recent progress. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2019, 34, 3842–3859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yang, F.; Lan, Y.; Xiong, M.; Jiang, J.; Song, K. Design of Magnetic Coupler for a 3 km Underwater AUV Wireless Charging System. In Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Wuhan, China, 26–28 March 2025; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  25. Erel, M.Z.; Bayindir, K.C.; Aydemir, M.T.; Chaudhary, S.K.; Guerrero, J.M. A comprehensive review on wireless capacitive power transfer technology: Fundamentals and applications. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 3116–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mohsan, S.A.H.; Qian, H.; Amjad, H. A comprehensive review of optical wireless power transfer technology. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng. 2023, 24, 767–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lecluyse, C.; Minnaert, B.; Kleemann, M. A review of the current state of technology of capacitive wireless power transfer. Energies 2021, 14, 5862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, J.; Yao, S.; Pan, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, C. A review of capacitive power transfer technology for electric vehicle applications. Electronics 2023, 12, 3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yan, Z.; Peng, B.; Wang, J.; Liang, B.; Zhang, K.; Hu, Y.; Mao, Z. An underwater wireless power transfer system with improved misalignment tolerance. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2025, 13, 4369–4376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, B.; Wang, X.; Lu, C.; Xu, W.; Lu, Y. Universal Wireless Power Transfer System for AUV Based on Flexible Magnetic Couplers. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Wireless Power Transfer (ICWPT2023), Weihai, China, 13–15 October 2023; pp. 59–67. [Google Scholar]
  31. Park, D.; Chung, W.K.; Kim, J. Analysis of electromagnetic waves attenuation for underwater localization in structured environments. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 2020, 18, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gao, G.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J. AWOA: An Advanced Whale Optimization Algorithm for Signal Detection in Underwater Magnetic Induction Multi-Input–Multi-Output Systems. Electronics 2023, 12, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vu, M.T.; Choi, H.S.; Nhat, T.Q.M.; Nguyen, N.D.; Lee, S.D.; Le, T.H.; Sur, J. Docking assessment algorithm for autonomous underwater vehicles. Appl. Ocean. Res. 2020, 100, 102180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vu, M.T.; Le Thanh, H.N.N.; Huynh, T.T.; Thang, Q.; Duc, T.; Hoang, Q.D.; Le, T.H. Station-keeping control of a hovering over-actuated autonomous underwater vehicle under ocean current effects and model uncertainties in horizontal plane. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 6855–6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Luo, W.; Ma, C.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, T.; Wu, T. The hydrodynamic interaction between an AUV and submarine during the recovery process. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, B.; Xu, W.; Lu, C.; Lu, Y.; Wang, X. Review of low-loss wireless power transfer methods for autonomous underwater vehicles. IET Power Electron. 2022, 15, 775–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Detka, K.; Górecki, K. Wireless power transfer—A review. Energies 2022, 15, 7236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Y.; Pan, L.; Yao, S.; Zhang, J.; Cui, S.; Zhu, C. A review on the recent development of high-frequency inverters for wireless power transfer. Energies 2024, 17, 5153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rotenberg, S.A.; Podilchak, S.K.; Re, P.D.H.; Mateo-Segura, C.; Goussetis, G.; Lee, J. Efficient rectifier for wireless power transmission systems. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2020, 68, 1921–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rattanarungngam, D.; Phaebua, K.; Lertwiriyaprapa, T. Power control unit for E-class power oscillator of 6.78 MHz wireless power transfer. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP), Phuket, Thailand, 30 October–2 November 2017; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ma, J.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ban, M.; Song, W. Thermal analysis and optimization of the magnetic coupler for wireless charging system. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 16269–16280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Waters, B.H.; Mahoney, B.J.; Lee, G.; Smith, J.R. Optimal coil size ratios for wireless power transfer applications. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS), Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 1–5 June 2014; pp. 2045–2048. [Google Scholar]
  43. Song, K.; Zhang, Z.; Qian, K.; Wang, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, C. Loss analysis and calculation of magnetic coupler in wireless charging system. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 4th International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC), Wuhan, China, 28–30 May 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, M.; Feng, J.; Shi, Y.; Shen, M. Demagnetization weakening and magnetic field concentration with ferrite core characterization for efficient wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 66, 1842–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mohammad, M.; Choi, S.; Elbuluk, M.E. Loss minimization design of ferrite core in a DD-coil-based high-power wireless charging system for electrical vehicle application. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2019, 5, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Laha, A.; Kalathy, A.; Pahlevani, M.; Jain, P. A comprehensive review on wireless power transfer systems for charging portable electronics. Eng 2023, 4, 1023–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wei, Y.; Luo, Q.; Mantooth, H.A. Synchronous rectification for LLC resonant converter: An overview. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 36, 7264–7280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yan, Z.; Zhao, C.; Hu, Q.; Wu, M.; Qiao, L.; Zhang, K.; Hu, Y. An underwater inductive power transfer system with a compact receiver and reduced eddy current loss. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, P.; Wu, X.; Cai, J.; Zhang, X.; Qiao, K.; Shen, H. Analysis of special technical problems of wireless charging at UUV docking stations and a new underwater electromagnetic coupler. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Campi, T.; Cruciani, S.; Feliziani, M. Magnetic shielding of wireless power transfer systems. In Proceedings of the 2014 international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility, Tokyo, Japan, 12–16 May 2014; pp. 422–425. [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu, P.; Gao, T.; Zhao, R.; Mao, Z. A novel conformal coil structure design of wireless power transfer system for autonomous underwater vehicles. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wen, H.; Wang, P.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, K.; Yang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Tong, X. Improving the misalignment tolerance of wireless power transfer system for AUV with solenoid-dual combined planar magnetic coupler. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Y.; Xie, K.; Ying, Y. A novel magnetic coupler with low leakage EMF for AUV wireless power transfer system. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Ind. Electron. 2024, 5, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, D.; Cui, S.; Zhang, J.; Bie, Z.; Song, K.; Zhu, C. A novel arc-shaped lightweight magnetic coupler for AUV wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat. 2022, 58, 1315–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Qiao, K.; Sun, P.; Rong, E.; Sun, J.; Zhou, H.; Wu, X. Anti-misalignment and lightweight magnetic coupler with H-shaped receiver structure for AUV wireless power transfer. IET Power Electron. 2022, 15, 1843–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, L.; Chen, X.; Sun, J.; Tian, L.; Bu, Z.; Xing, D.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, B.; Wen, H.; Zhao, Y.; et al. High Power and High Freedom Platform Type Undersea Wireless Power Transfer Station Without Ferrite Core for AUVs. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2025, 13, 1269–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cai, C.; Wu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Yang, S. Development of a fit-to-surface and lightweight magnetic coupler for autonomous underwater vehicle wireless charging systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 36, 9927–9940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Piskura, J.C.; Purcell, M.; Stokey, R.; Austin, T.; Tebo, D.; Christensen, R.; Jaffre, F. Development of a robust Line Capture, Line Recovery (LCLR) technology for autonomous docking of AUVs. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey, Monterey, CA, USA, 19–23 September 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  59. Meng, L.; Lin, Y.; Gu, H.; Su, T.C. Study on dynamic docking process and collision problems of captured-rod docking method. Ocean Eng. 2019, 193, 106624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, T.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, C. Visual navigation and docking for a planar type AUV docking and charging system. Ocean Eng. 2021, 224, 108744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, Z.; Guan, X.; Liu, C.; Yang, S.; Xiang, X.; Chen, H. Acoustic communication and imaging sonar guided AUV docking: System infrastructure, docking methodology and lake trials. Control Eng. Pract. 2023, 136, 105529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Z.; Lin, M.; Li, D.; Wu, R.; Lin, R.; Yang, C. An AUV-enabled dockable platform for long-term dynamic and static monitoring of marine pastures. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2024, 50, 276–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kojiya, T.; Sato, F.; Matsuki, H.; Sato, T. Automatic power supply system to underwater vehicles utilizing non-contacting technology. In Proceedings of the Oceans’ 04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean’04 (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37600), Kobe, Japan, 9–12 November 2004; pp. 2341–2345. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhou, J.; Yao, P.; Chen, Y.; Guo, K.; Hu, S.; Sun, H. Design considerations for a self-latching coupling structure of inductive power transfer for autonomous underwater vehicle. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2021, 57, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cheng, Z.; Lei, Y.; Song, K.; Zhu, C. Design and loss analysis of loosely coupled transformer for an underwater high-power inductive power transfer system. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2015, 51, 8401110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yan, Z.; Zhang, K.; Wen, H.; Song, B. Research on characteristics of contactless power transmission device for autonomous underwater vehicle. In Proceedings of the Oceans 2016-Shanghai, Chengdu, China, 20–22 December 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  67. Cai, C.; Qin, M.; Wu, S.; Yang, Z. A strong misalignmentt tolerance magnetic coupler for autonomous underwater vehicle wireless power transfer system. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Power Electronics and Application Conference and Exposition (PEAC), Shenzhen, China, 4–7 November 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  68. Lin, M.; Li, D.; Yang, C. Design of an ICPT system for battery charging applied to underwater docking systems. Ocean Eng. 2017, 145, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, B.; Wang, X.; Lu, C.; Lu, Y.; Xu, W. A wireless power transfer system for an autonomous underwater vehicle based on lightweight universal variable ring-shaped magnetic coupling. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 2023, 51, 2654–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, B.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Xu, W.; Lu, C.; Lu, Y. High-power-density wireless power transfer system for autonomous underwater vehicle based on a variable ring-shaped magnetic coupler. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2024, 10, 3061–3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yu, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y. Research on A Three-Phase Battery Wireless Charger with Arc Transmitting Coils for AUV. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 2nd International Power Electronics and Application Symposium (PEAS), Guangzhou, China, 10–13 November 2023; pp. 930–934. [Google Scholar]
  72. Liu, T.; Li, X.; Fan, S.; Bai, W.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, Y. Squirrel cage magnetic coupler suitable for unmanned underwater vehicles wireless charging applications. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Automation and Computer Engineering (ICEACE), Changchun, China, 29–31 December 2023; pp. 1158–1162. [Google Scholar]
  73. Mostafa, A.; Wang, Y.; Lu, F.; Zhang, H. Enhanced Axial Misalignment Tolerance in a 10 kW Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Wireless Charging System Utilizing a Split Solenoid Coupler. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 12041–12046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, D.; Gao, Z.; Chen, F.; Cui, S.; Bie, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, C. Wide Anti-Misalignment Tolerance WPT System with Uniform Magnetic Field Coupler for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2024, 13, 4045–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xiong, M.; Liu, Y.; Yang, F.; Lan, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, J.; Song, K. A Multidimensional Misalignment-Tolerant Wireless Power Transfer System Based on Coaxial Split Solenoid Coil for AUV Charging Applications. In Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Wuhan, China, 26–28 March 2025; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  76. Hasaba, R.; Yamaguchi, S.; Yagi, T.; Eguchi, K.; Satoh, H.; Koyanagi, Y.; Ura, T. Experimental study of kW-class wireless charging system for autonomous underwater vehicle with magnetic resonance. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Underwater Technology (UT), Tokyo, Japan, 6–9 March 2023; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  77. Kan, T.; Mai, R.; Mercier, P.P.; Mi, C.C. Design and analysis of a three-phase wireless charging system for lightweight autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2018, 33, 6622–6632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kan, T.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, Z.; Mercier, P.P.; Mi, C.C. A rotation-resilient wireless charging system for lightweight autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2018, 67, 6935–6942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yan, Z.; Song, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Mao, Z.; Hu, Y. A rotation-free wireless power transfer system with stable output power and efficiency for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2019, 34, 4005–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yan, Z.; Wu, M.; Zhao, C.; Hu, Q.; Zhu, L.; Qiao, L.; Wang, L. Free-rotation wireless power transfer system based on composite anti-misalignment method for AUVs. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 4262–4266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xu, F.; Li, M.; Yuan, Z.; Yang, Q. Wide rotation-misalignment-tolerance design of magnetic coupled structure for AUVs wireless charging system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2024, 71, 14086–14096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chen, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xu, F.; Yang, Q.; Li, M.; Deng, X. Novel designs of magnetic coupled structure with 360° rotation misalignment tolerance for AUVs wireless charging system. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 15403–15408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mostafa, A.; Wang, Y.; Tangirala, S.; Zhang, H.; Lu, F. A 5 kW hull-compatible inductive charging system with 360 folded spatial unipolar coupler for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs). IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat. 2023, 59, 7001–7012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mostafa, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Tangirala, S.; Lu, F. An ultra-fast wireless charging system with a hull-compatible coil structure for autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC), Anaheim, CA, USA,, 15–17 June 2022; pp. 279–284. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang, B.; Yang, F.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, C.; Mo, L.; Fan, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Lu, Y. A High-Compatibility Wireless Power Transfer System for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Based on Reconfigurable Magnetic Couplers. IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat. 2025, 61, 3457–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, B.; Jiang, C.; Yang, F.; Chen, C.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, J. An Anti-Rotation Wireless Power Transfer System with a Flexible Magnetic Coupler for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2025, 40, 2593–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xia, T.; Li, H.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, P. A circular-arc-type magnetic coupler with strong misalignment tolerance for AUV wireless charging system. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cai, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, L. A circumferential coupled dipole-coil magnetic coupler for autonomous underwater vehicles wireless charging applications. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 65432–65442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lin, M.; Lin, R.; Li, D.; Duan, R. Development of a radially coupled wireless charging system for torpedo-shaped autonomous underwater vehicles. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tang, H.; Shen, Z.; Xie, R.; Pan, W.; Chen, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y. A novel arc-shaped magnetic coupler with dual-channel receiver for rotational misalignment tolerance in AUV underwater wireless power transfer systems. Int. J. Circ. Theor. App. 2025, 53, 1866–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, D.; Chen, F.; Zhang, J.; Cui, S.; Bie, Z.; Zhu, C. A novel pendulum-type magnetic coupler with high misalignment tolerance for AUV underwater wireless power transfer systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 14861–14871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Song, B.; Mi, C. Underwater wireless power transfer system with a curly coil structure for AUVs. IET Power Electron. 2019, 12, 2559–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhao, Y.; Shen, S.; Yin, F.; Zhou, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, L. An Advanced Multidimensional Anti-Misalignment Coupler for AUV Wireless Charging Systems. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2025, 11, 5641–5653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wu, S.; Cai, C.; Wang, A.; Qin, Z.; Yang, S. Design and implementation of a uniform power and stable efficiency wireless charging system for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2023, 70, 5674–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wu, S.; Cai, C.; Chai, W.; Li, J.; Cui, Q.; Yang, S. Uniform power IPT system with quadruple-coil transmitter and crossed dipole receiver for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat. 2022, 58, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cai, C.; Cui, Q.; Meng, X.; Wu, S.; Chai, W. Design of a misalignment-tolerant wireless charging system based on multidimensional cross-coupling for autonomous underwater vehicles. J. Power. Electron. 2022, 22, 2147–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lin, H.; Cai, C.; Wu, S.; Jiao, Y.; Chai, W.; Yu, J. Compact and Misalignment Tolerance IPT System Based on Sine-Cosine Coupling Superposition for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Applications. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2025, 11, 6940–6951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Li, Z.s.; Li, D.j.; Lin, L.; Chen, Y. Design considerations for electromagnetic couplers in contactless power transmission systems for deep-sea applications. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. C 2010, 11, 824–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liang, B.; Mao, Z.; Zhang, K.; Liu, P. Analysis and optimal design of a WPT coupler for underwater vehicles using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. La, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Shen, S.; Zhao, Y.; Yin, F. Design of an anti-offset magnetic coupler for wireless charging of underwater vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2024 6th Asia Energy and Electrical Engineering Symposium (AEEES), Chengdu, China, 28–31 March 2024; pp. 776–780. [Google Scholar]
  101. Yang, C.; Wang, T.; Chen, Y. Design and analysis of an omnidirectional and positioning tolerant AUV charging platform. IET Power Electron. 2019, 12, 2108–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lyu, F.; Cai, T.; Huang, F. A universal wireless charging platform with novel bulged-structure transmitter design for multiple heterogeneous autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). IET Power Electron. 2023, 16, 2162–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cai, T.; Lyu, F.; Wang, T.; Huang, F. Design of a Highly Compatible Underwater Wireless Power Transfer Station for Seafloor Observation Equipment. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Fu, Y.; Shi, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Lv, K.; Peng, Z. PT Symmetry-Based AUV Dual Transmission Coil Wireless Power Transfer System Design. Machines 2023, 11, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. He, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ding, L.; Nie, X. Research on three-dimensional omnidirectional wireless power transfer system for subsea operation. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2017-Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK, 19–22 June 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  106. Zhang, X.; Xu, J. Design and implementation of an underwater spatial omnidirectional wireless power transfer system. Electr. Eng. 2023, 105, 3347–3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rezazade, S.; Shahirinia, A.; Naghash, R.; Rasekh, N.; Afjei, S.E. A novel efficient hybrid compensation topology for wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2023, 70, 2277–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yuan, Z.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X.; Chen, Z.; Xue, M.; Zhang, P. High-order compensation topology integration for high-tolerant wireless power transfer. Energies 2023, 16, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, W.; Wang, Q.; Kang, J.; Wang, Y. Energy-concentrating optimization based on energy distribution characteristics of MCR WPT systems with SS/PS compensation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2020, 67, 10410–10420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Qiao, K.; Rong, E.; Sun, P.; Zhang, X.; Sun, J. Design of LCC-P Constant Current Topology Parameters for AUV Wireless Power Transfer. Energies 2022, 15, 5249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yang, C.; Lin, M.; Li, D. Improving steady and starting characteristics of wireless charging for an AUV docking system. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2020, 45, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Li, J.; Zhang, K.; Yan, Z.; Wen, H.; Peng, B.; Wang, J. A Compact Underwater WPT System with Load-Independent Current Output Characteristic under Wide Range of Coupling Coefficient. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2025, 40, 10198–10208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yang, L.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, B.; Wen, H.; Yang, T.; Zhao, X.; Huang, J.; Zhu, D.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Underwater Power Conversion and Junction Technology for Underwater Wireless Power Transfer Stations. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Li, H.; Liu, X.; Gao, F.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Tang, H. Power Transfer Capacity Improvement of AUV IPT Systems via Impedance Transformation. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2025, 11, 7040–7053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chen, G.; Sun, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhou, B.; Meng, F.; Tang, C. Wireless power and data transmission system of submarine cable-inspecting robot fish and its time-sharing multiplexing method. Electronics 2019, 8, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Tang, H.; Liu, C.; Pan, W.; Rao, P.; Zhuang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y. A self-adaptive dual-channel LCC-S detuned topology for misalignment tolerance in AUV wireless power transfer systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 40, 4630–4639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chen, F.; Garnier, H.; Deng, Q.; Kazimierczuk, M.K.; Zhuan, X. Control-oriented modeling of wireless power transfer systems with phase-shift control. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 2119–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Aldhaher, S.; Luk, P.C.K.; Bati, A.; Whidborne, J.F. Wireless power transfer using Class E inverter with saturable DC-feed inductor. IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat. 2014, 50, 2710–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhou, Z.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Long, R.; Su, H. Model predictive control for the receiving-side DC–DC converter of dynamic wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 8985–8997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhu, H.; Zhang, B.; Wu, L. Output power stabilization for wireless power transfer system employing primary-side-only control. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 63735–63747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lovison, G.; Kobayashi, D.; Sato, M.; Imura, T.; Hori, Y. Secondary-side-only control for high efficiency and desired power with two converters in wireless power transfer systems. In Proceedings of the IECON 2015—41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Yokohama, Japan, 9–12 November 2017; Volume 6, pp. 473–481. [Google Scholar]
  122. Zheng, Z.; Wang, N.; Ahmed, S. Decoupling control scheme bridging frequency tracking and DC output stabilizing for wireless charging system of autonomous underwater vehicles. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 2022, 20, 1099–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Fan, Z.; La, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Zhao, L.; Yin, F.; Zhang, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, L. An Optimized SPWM Strategy Against Detuning Effect in UWPT System Based on FPGA. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 2nd International Power Electronics and Application Symposium (PEAS), Guangzhou, China, 10–13 November 2023; pp. 1307–1310. [Google Scholar]
  124. Li, J.; Zhu, C.; Xie, J.; Lu, F.; Zhang, X. Design and implementation of high-misalignment tolerance WPT system for underwater vehicles based on a variable inductor. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 11726–11737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Luo, J.; Chen, K.; Ouyang, Y.; Hong, Y.; Pan, J. Dynamic Control of Power Supply for Distance Changing in Underwater Wireless Power Transfer. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 9th International Conference on Power Electronics Systems and Applications (PESA), Hong Kong, China, 20–22 September 2022; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  126. Fu, Y.; Tang, H.; Luo, J.; Peng, Z. Anti-Offset Multicoil Underwater Wireless Power Transfer Based on a BP Neural Network. Machines 2024, 12, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, B.; Jiang, C.; Chen, C.; Fan, Y.; Zhou, J.; Lu, Y. Radial Rotation Angle Recognition of Wireless Power Transfer System for AUVs. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 10th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC2024-ECCE Asia), Chengdu, China, 17–20 May 2024; pp. 3049–3053. [Google Scholar]
  128. Xia, Z.; Dai, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, F.; Wang, W. Model Predictive Control of Wireless Power Transfer System in Seawater Environment. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 16877–16893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hao, B.; Xu, X.; Wei, Y.T.; Huang, S.B.; Zhao, D. Dynamic parameter identification method for wireless charging system of AUV based on multi-strategy nonlinear rime algorithm. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2024, 162, 110344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Xia, T.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Yu, H.; Li, H. An Adaptive Control Strategy for Underwater Wireless Charging System Output Power with an Arc-Shaped Magnetic Core Structure. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, X.; Lu, D.; Liao, Z.; Rong, C.; Xia, C. Critical and Parasitic Parameters Identification and Frequency Regulation Strategies for UWPT Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 10558–10567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Luo, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, M.; Wang, F.; Bai, L.; Jiang, C.; You, J. Front-End Parameter Identification Method Based on Adam-W Optimization Algorithm for Underwater Wireless Power Transfer System. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2025, 40, 6307–6318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Orekan, T.; Zhang, P.; Shih, C. Analysis, design, and maximum power-efficiency tracking for undersea wireless power transfer. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2018, 6, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Li, H.; Li, J.; Wang, K.; Chen, W.; Yang, X. A maximum efficiency point tracking control scheme for wireless power transfer systems using magnetic resonant coupling. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 3998–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wang, Y.; Tang, J. Constant current charging and maximum system efficiency tracking control scheme for AUV wireless charging. In Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Energy, Power and Electrical Engineering (EPEE), Wuhan, China, 15–17 September 2023; pp. 1451–1460. [Google Scholar]
  136. Zheng, Z.; Wang, N.; Ahmed, S. Maximum efficiency tracking control of underwater wireless power transfer system using artificial neural networks. Proc. Inst Mech. Eng. Part I J. Syst. Control Eng. 2021, 235, 1819–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hu, Y.; Kang, L.; Zheng, W.; Bai, J. Impedance matching control method for an underwater magnetic resonance-based wireless power transfer system with metamaterials. J. Electromagent Wave 2016, 30, 2003–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wang, J.; Song, B.; Wang, Y. A method to reduce eddy current loss of underwater wireless power transmission by current control. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Yang, L.; Zhang, B.; Ju, M. A fast dynamic response regulation method for undersea wireless power transfer system. In Proceedings of the 2019 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Xi’an, China, 19–21 June 2019; pp. 1162–1166. [Google Scholar]
  140. Siroos, A.; Sedighizadeh, M.; Afjei, E.; Fini, A.S. Comparison of different controllers for wireless charging system in AUVs. In Proceedings of the 2022 13th power electronics, drive systems, and technologies conference (PEDSTC), Tehran, Iran, 1–3 February 2022; pp. 155–160. [Google Scholar]
  141. Yang, L.; Chen, X.; Tian, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, D.; Bu, Z.; Sun, J.; Feng, B.; Wen, H.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Constant Voltage and Constant Current Control Method of Undersea Wireless Power Supply System Based on Frequency Tracking Method. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2025, 40, 6359–6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Karmakar, G.; Kamruzzaman, J.; Nowsheen, N. An efficient data delivery mechanism for AUV-based Ad hoc UASNs. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 86, 1193–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Bellingham, J.G. Autonomous underwater vehicle docking. In Springer Handbook of Ocean Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 387–406. [Google Scholar]
  144. Lin, R.; Li, D.; Zhang, T.; Lin, M. A non-contact docking system for charging and recovering autonomous underwater vehicle. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2019, 24, 902–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhuo, X.; Liu, M.; Wei, Y.; Yu, G.; Qu, F.; Sun, R. AUV-aided energy-efficient data collection in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 7, 10010–10022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Anguita, D.; Brizzolara, D.; Parodi, G.; Hu, Q. Optical wireless underwater communication for AUV: Preliminary simulation and experimental results. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2011 IEEE-Spain, Santander, Spain, 6–9 June 2011; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  147. Kaushal, H.; Kaddoum, G. Underwater optical wireless communication. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 1518–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Soomro, M.; Azar, S.N.; Gurbuz, O.; Onat, A. Work-in-progress: Networked control of autonomous underwater vehicles with acoustic and radio frequency hybrid communication. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS), Paris, France, 5–8 December 2017; pp. 366–368. [Google Scholar]
  149. Alahmad, R.; Alraie, H.; Hasaba, R.; Eguchi, K.; Matsushima, T.; Fukumoto, Y.; Ishii, K. Performance analysis of underwater radiofrequency communication in seawater: An experimental study. J. Mar. Sci. Eng 2024, 12, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Fan, S.; Liu, C.; Li, B.; Xu, Y.; Xu, W. AUV docking based on USBL navigation and vision guidance. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2019, 24, 673–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Sans-Muntadas, A.; Brekke, E.F.; Hegrenaes, Ø.; Pettersen, K.Y. Navigation and probability assessment for successful AUV docking using USBL. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015, 48, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Pontbriand, C.; Farr, N.; Hansen, J.; Kinsey, J.C.; Pelletier, L.P.; Ware, J.; Fourie, D. Wireless data harvesting using the AUV Sentry and WHOI optical modem. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2015-MTS/IEEE Washington, Washington, DC, USA, 19–22 October 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  153. Ali, M.F.; Jayakody, D.N.K.; Li, Y. Recent trends in underwater visible light communication (UVLC) systems. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 22169–22225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Granger, R.P.; Baer, C.M.; Gabriel, N.H.; Labosky, J.J.; Galford, T.C. Non-contact wet mateable connectors for power and data transmission. In Proceedings of the 2013 OCEANS-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA, 23–27 September 2013; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  155. Li, D.j.; Chen, Y.h.; Shi, J.g.; Yang, C.j. Autonomous underwater vehicle docking system for cabled ocean observatory network. Ocean Eng. 2015, 109, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Shi, J.; Li, F.; Peng, S.; Cai, W.; Pan, M.; Yu, H. Design and analysis of a noninsert wet mateable connector for underwater power and data transfer. Mar. Techmol. Soc. J. 2020, 54, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Jin, C.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, T. A survey of underwater magnetic induction communications: Fundamental issues, recent advances, and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2019, 21, 2466–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Cai, C.; Li, J.; Wu, S.; Qin, Z.; Chai, W.; Yang, S. A bipolar and unipolar magnetic channel multiplexed WPT system with simultaneous full-duplex communication for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 15086–15090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Da, C.; Wang, L.; Li, F.; Tao, C.; Zhang, Y. Analysis of undersea simultaneous wireless power and 1 Mb/s data rate transfer system based on DDQ coil. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 11814–11825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Da, C.; Li, F.; Wang, L.; Tao, C.; Li, S.; Nie, M. Pulse Synchronization Scheme for Undersea BWPT System Based on Simultaneous Wireless Power and Data Transfer Technology. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Exp. Briefs 2025, 72, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Zhang, K.; Wang, J.; Yan, Z.; Peng, B.; Liang, B.; Mao, Z.; Tian, W. A Quadrature-Coil-Based Simultaneous Power and Information Transfer System with Low Interference. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 7th International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC), Harbin, China, 10–12 May 2024; pp. 4705–4709. [Google Scholar]
  162. Li, T.; Sun, Z.; Wang, Y.; Mai, J.; Xu, D. Undersea simultaneous wireless power and data transfer system with extended communication distance and high rate. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 2917–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Hu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ding, L.; Wu, P. Underwater Wireless Charging and Communication Integrated System. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2019-Marseille, Marseille, France, 17–20 June 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  164. Wang, Y.; Li, T.; Zeng, M.; Mai, J.; Gu, P.; Xu, D. An underwater simultaneous wireless power and data transfer system for AUV with high-rate full-duplex communication. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 619–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Li, J.; Wu, S.; Liang, C.; Liu, X.; Chai, W.; Cai, C. Wireless Power and High-Speed Full-Duplex Data Synchronous Transfer System Based on OFDM Method. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 10th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC2024-ECCE Asia), Chengdu, China, 17–20 May 2024; pp. 3879–3882. [Google Scholar]
  166. Zeng, Y.; Lu, C.; Liu, R.; He, X.; Rong, C.; Liu, M. Wireless power and data transfer system using multidirectional magnetic coupler for swarm AUVs. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 1440–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Li, T.; Sun, Z.; Wang, Y.; Mai, J.; Xu, D. An underwater simultaneous wireless power and data transfer system with 1-Mbps full-duplex communication link. IEEE Trans Ind. Inform. 2024, 20, 2620–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Li, T.; Sun, Z.; Wang, Y.; Mai, J.; Xu, D. Simultaneous wireless power and data transfer system with full-duplex MIMO communication channels for underwater applications. IEEE Trans Ind. Inform. 2024, 20, 6382–6393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yang, L.; Huang, J.; Feng, B.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Jian, J.; Wang, Z.; Tong, X. Undersea wireless power and data transfer system with shared channel powered by marine renewable energy system. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst. 2022, 12, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Fukuda, H.; Kobayashi, N.; Shizuno, K.; Yoshida, S.; Tanomura, M.; Hama, Y. New concept of an electromagnetic usage for contactless communication and power transmission in the ocean. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Underwater Technology Symposium (UT), Tokyo, Japan, 5–8 March 2013; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  171. Luo, Y.; Yang, Y.; Hong, H.; Dai, Z. A simultaneous wireless power and data transfer system with full-duplex mode for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 24, 12570–12583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Yan, Z.; Song, B.; Zhang, K.; Wen, H.; Mao, Z.; Hu, Y. Eddy current loss analysis of underwater wireless power transfer systems with misalignments. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 101421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Yan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Kan, T.; Lu, F.; Zhang, K.; Song, B.; Mi, C.C. Frequency optimization of a loosely coupled underwater wireless power transfer system considering eddy current loss. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 66, 3468–3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Shafiei, S.; Yazdi, S.S.H.; Adaikhan, N.; Bagheri, M. A Detailed Analytical Modeling of Eddy Current Losses in an Underwater Medium for Wireless Power Transfer. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 28988–28999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Shafiei, S.; Yazdi, S.S.H.; Kapanov, A.; Kermani, M.; Saukhimov, A.; Hekmati, A.; Bagheri, M. Design and Implementation of Underwater Inductive Power Transfer Systems with an Accurate Eddy Current Loss Model Approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat. 2024, 61, 3359–3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, D.; Park, J.; Park, B.; Huh, S.; Ahn, S. Analysis of eddy current loss for wireless power transfer in conductive medium using Z-parameters method. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 15–19 November 2020; pp. 432–434. [Google Scholar]
  177. Kim, J.; Kim, K.; Kim, H.; Kim, D.; Park, J.; Ahn, S. An efficient modeling for underwater wireless power transfer using Z-parameters. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 2019, 61, 2006–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Lin, R.; Lin, M.; Yang, C.; Li, D.; Zhang, Z. Frequency optimization of the AUV wireless charging system for minimum energy dissipation. Ocean Eng. 2024, 312, 119066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Zhang, K.; Ma, Y.; Yan, Z.; Di, Z.; Song, B.; Hu, A.P. Eddy current loss and detuning effect of seawater on wireless power transfer. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2020, 8, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Liu, Z.; Li, F.; Tao, C.; Li, S.; Wang, L. Design of wireless power transfer system for autonomous underwater vehicles considering seawater eddy current loss. Microsyst. Technol. 2021, 27, 3783–3792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Li, J.; Liu, K.; Xie, J.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, X. Frequency optimization method for underwater wireless power transfer considering coupling conditions. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Detroit, MI, USA, 9–13 October 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  182. Santos, H.; Pereira, M.; Pessoa, L.; Salgado, H. Design and optimization of air core spiral resonators for magnetic coupling wireless power transfer on seawater. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC), Aveiro, Portugal, 5–6 May 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  183. Fei, Y.; Tang, C.; Deng, R.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Z. Universal Eddy Current Loss Modeling for Seawater WPT Systems via Pattern Extraction and Curve Fitting. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2025, 40, 14000–14013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Qiao, Y.; Fan, Z.; Li, S.; Lu, S.; Yu, S.; Liu, Z. Analysis of Eddy Current Loss and Frequency Optimization in Seawater WPT Systems with High Distance-Diameter Ratio. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 10th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC2024-ECCE Asia), Chengdu, China, 17–20 May 2024; pp. 2033–2038. [Google Scholar]
  185. Luo, T.; Zhang, S. Design of underwater wireless power transmission system based on inductive coupling. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Xu, F.; Huang, H. Frequency selection for underwater wireless power transfer based on the analysis of eddy current loss. AEU-Int. J. Electron. C 2023, 163, 154618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Zhang, K.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Yan, Z.; Song, B.; Mi, C.C. A new coil structure to reduce eddy current loss of WPT systems for underwater vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Cheng, Z.; Ji, T.; Li, A.; Kacprzak, D.; Hu, A.P. Multi-Physics Field Coupling Modeling and Thermal Distribution Analysis of Underwater Rotary Magnetic Coupling Mechanism. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2025, 61, 8000310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Hobson, B.W.; McEwen, R.S.; Erickson, J.; Hoover, T.; McBride, L.; Shane, F.; Bellingham, J.G. The development and ocean testing of an AUV docking station for a 21" AUV. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 29 September–4 October 2007; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  190. Nichols, J.; Leslie, D.; Soylu, S.; Crees, T.; Woodroffe, A.; McLean, S. Imotus: An autonomous underwater resident vehicle for vertical profiling. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA, 22–25 October 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  191. Yoshida, H.; Ishibashi, S.; Yutaka, O.; Sugesawa, M.; Tanaka, K. A concept design of underwater docking robot and development of its fundamental technologies. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV), Tokyo, Japan, 6–9 November 2016; pp. 408–411. [Google Scholar]
  192. Matsuda, T.; Maki, T.; Masuda, K.; Sakamaki, T. Resident autonomous underwater vehicle: Underwater system for prolonged and continuous monitoring based at a seafloor station. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2019, 120, 103231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Kawasaki, T.; Noguchi, T.; Fukasawa, T.; Hayashi, S.; Shibata, Y.; Limori, T.; Okaya, N.; Fukui, K.; Kinoshita, M. “Marine Bird”, a new experimental AUV-results of docking and electric power supply tests in sea trials. In Proceedings of the Oceans’ 04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean’04 (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37600), Kobe, Japan, 9–12 November 2004; Volume 3, pp. 1738–1744. [Google Scholar]
  194. Kawasaki, T.; Fukasawa, T.; Noguchi, T.; Baino, M. Development of AUV” Marine Bird” with underwater docking and recharging system. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference Physics and Control. Proceedings (Cat. No. 03EX708), Tokyo, Japan, 25–27 June 2003; pp. 166–170. [Google Scholar]
  195. Yoshida, S.; Tanomura, M.; Hama, Y.; Hirose, T.; Suzuki, A.; Matsui, Y.; Sogo, N.; Sato, R. Underwater wireless power transfer for non-fixed unmanned underwater vehicle in the ocean. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV), Tokyo, Japan, 6–9 November 2016; pp. 177–180. [Google Scholar]
  196. Dong, H.; Wu, Z.; Wang, J.; Chen, D.; Tan, M.; Yu, J. Implementation of autonomous docking and charging for a supporting robotic fish. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2023, 70, 7023–7031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Pyle, D.; Granger, R.; Geoghegan, B.; Lindman, R.; Smith, J. Leveraging a large UUV platform with a docking station to enable forward basing and persistence for light weight AUVs. In Proceedings of the 2012 Oceans, Hampton Roads, VA, USA, 14–19 October 2012; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  198. Maguer, A.; Been, R.; Tesei, A.; Alves, J.; Grandi, V.; Biagini, S. Recent technological advances in Underwater Autonomy. In Proceedings of the 2018 OCEANS-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO), Kobe, Japan, 28–31 May 2018; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  199. Feezor, M.D.; Sorrell, F.Y.; Blankinship, P.R. An interface system for autonomous undersea vehicles. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2001, 26, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Wen, H.; Li, J.; Yang, L.; Tong, X. Feasibility study on wireless power transfer for AUV with novel pressure-resistant ceramic materials. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC-Himeji 2022-ECCE Asia), Himeji, Japan, 15–19 May 2022; pp. 182–185. [Google Scholar]
  201. Chen, C.; Jiang, C.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Luo, B.; Cheng, Y. Compact curved coupler with novel flexible nanocrystalline flake ribbon core for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Chen, C.; Jiang, C.; Ma, T.; Zhang, B.; Xiang, J.; Zhou, J. Core loss optimization for compact coupler via square crushed nanocrystalline flake ribbon core. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 9095–9099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Xu, H.; Zheng, R.; Ning, W. Design and Performance Analysis of Fe-Based Nanocrystalline Materials for Underwater Wireless Power Transfer Systems. In Proceedings of the 2024 3rd Asia Power and Electrical Technology Conference (APET), Fuzhou, China, 15–17 November 2024; pp. 463–468. [Google Scholar]
  204. Zhou, J.; Guo, K.; Chen, Z.; Sun, H.; Hu, S. Design considerations for contact-less underwater power delivery: A systematic review and critical analysis. Wirel. Power. Transf. 2020, 7, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Patil, D.; McDonough, M.K.; Miller, J.M.; Fahimi, B.; Balsara, P.T. Wireless power transfer for vehicular applications: Overview and challenges. IEEE. Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2018, 4, 3–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Kan, T.; Mai, R.; Mercier, P.P.; Mi, C. A three-phase wireless charging system for lightweight autonomous underwater vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Tampa, FL, USA, 26–30 March 2017; pp. 1407–1411. [Google Scholar]
  207. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys. 2010, 99, 818–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Brezinski, K.; Taylor, E. MIL-STD-461/MIL-STD-704 Investigation. SAE Trans. 1993, 102, 1861–1875. [Google Scholar]
  209. Chen, Y.; Yang, B.; Zhou, X.; Li, Q.; He, Z.; Mai, R.; Lai, J.S. A hybrid inductive power transfer system with misalignment tolerance using quadruple-D quadrature pads. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 6039–6049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Mohsan, S.A.H.; Khan, M.A.; Mazinani, A.; Alsharif, M.H.; Cho, H.S. Enabling underwater wireless power transfer towards sixth generation (6g) wireless networks: Opportunities, recent advances, and technical challenges. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Agostinho, L.R.; Ricardo, N.C.; Silva, R.J.; Pinto, A.M. A modular inductive wireless charging solution for autonomous underwater vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC), Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal, 28–29 April 2021; pp. 68–73. [Google Scholar]
  212. Omeke, K.G.; Mollel, M.; Shah, S.T.; Zhang, L.; Abbasi, Q.H.; Imran, M.A. Toward a sustainable internet of underwater things based on auvs, swipt, and reinforcement learning. IEEE Internet Things. J. 2024, 11, 7640–7651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Lin, M.; Lin, R.; Chen, L.; Yang, C.; Li, D. Underwater docking system with bidirectional wireless power transmission capability. In Proceedings of the Global Oceans 2020: Singapore–US Gulf Coast, Biloxi, MS, USA, 5–30 October 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  214. Guo, H.; Sun, Z.; Wang, P. Joint design of communication, wireless energy transfer, and control for swarm autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2021, 70, 1821–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Yan, Z.; Zhang, K.; Qiao, L.; Hu, Y.; Song, B. A multiload wireless power transfer system with concentrated magnetic field for AUV cluster system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2022, 58, 1307–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. He, L.; Zhao, S.; Wang, X.; Lee, C.K. Artificial neural network-based parameter identification method for wireless power transfer systems. Electronics 2022, 11, 1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Wu, N.; Gao, T.; Wang, M.; Gao, K.; Qi, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Feng, Z. Experimental study on autonomous docking and hook-locking control for unmanned surface vehicle platforms. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. I: J. Syst. Control Eng. 2024, 238, 448–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Ali, A.; Culliton, D.; Fahad, S.; Ali, Z.; Kang, E.T.; Xu, L. Nature-inspired anti-fouling strategies for combating marine biofouling. Prog. Org. Coatings 2024, 189, 108349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Anis, S.F.; Lalia, B.S.; Hashaikeh, R.; Hilal, N. Ceramic nanofiltration membranes for efficient fouling mitigation through periodic electrolysis. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 303, 122228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.