This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling
1
Department of Environmental Engineering, Chungbuk National University, 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-Gu, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
2
RED Inc., 11-19, Bideukbawi-gil, Jori-eup, Paju-si 10949, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(17), 1847; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171847 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 21 July 2025
/
Revised: 26 August 2025
/
Accepted: 27 August 2025
/
Published: 29 August 2025
Abstract
Ammonia (NH3) emissions from swine manure pits contribute significantly to odor nuisance, health risks, and secondary PM2.5 formation. This study assessed the pilot-scale performance of three source-control technologies: surface sealing with surfactant-based foam system (FOAM SYSTEM), swine manure wiping and removing system (WIPING SYSTEM), and belt-conveyor-based solid–liquid separator system (BELT SYSTEM). Each technology targets a different pathway in the ammonia generation process. The FOAM SYSTEM suppresses volatilization by forming a foam barrier at the air–liquid interface. The WIPING SYSTEM reduces precursor contact time by periodically removing feces. The BELT SYSTEM separates feces and urine upon excretion, inhibiting enzymatic ammonia formation. Among the individual systems, the BELT SYSTEM achieved the highest ammonia reduction efficiency of 91.7%, followed by the FOAM SYSTEM (73.6%) and WIPING SYSTEM (64.4%). The combined FOAM SYSTEM + BELT SYSTEM yielded the best performance with an ammonia reduction efficiency of 94.4%, showing modest synergy without operational interference. In contrast, the FOAM SYSTEM + WIPING SYSTEM configuration achieved 71.1%, slightly lower than the FOAM SYSTEM alone, likely due to foam disruption. Environmental sensitivity tests revealed that higher temperatures and alkaline pH elevated NH3 emissions, whereas systems that maintained near-neutral pH, like the FOAM SYSTEM, demonstrated greater stability. These findings highlight the importance of integrating physical and source-control mechanisms while considering environmental variability for effective on-farm ammonia mitigation.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ahn, B.-k.; Kim, T.-H.; Lee, J.-S.; Lee, C.-K.; Yun, Y.-M.
Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1847.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171847
AMA Style
Ahn B-k, Kim T-H, Lee J-S, Lee C-K, Yun Y-M.
Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling. Agriculture. 2025; 15(17):1847.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171847
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ahn, Byung-kyu, Tae-Hoon Kim, Jung-Sup Lee, Chang-Kyu Lee, and Yeo-Myeong Yun.
2025. "Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling" Agriculture 15, no. 17: 1847.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171847
APA Style
Ahn, B.-k., Kim, T.-H., Lee, J.-S., Lee, C.-K., & Yun, Y.-M.
(2025). Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling. Agriculture, 15(17), 1847.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171847
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.