Next Article in Journal
The Influence of PAR 1 and Endothelin 1 on the Course of Specific Kidney Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Use and Perceived Helpfulness of Different Intervention Strategies in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Depression
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of Rehabilitation Interventions for Athletes with Chronic Ankle Instability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Patients’ Voices on Ketamine for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Narrative Review of Qualitative Perspectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Socially Assistive Robot Hyodol for Depressive Symptoms of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Medically Underserved Areas: A Preliminary Study

1
Department of Psychiatry, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin 16995, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Integrative Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06229, Republic of Korea
3
Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
4
Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
5
Center for Digital Health, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin 16995, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(1), 217; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010217
Submission received: 2 December 2025 / Revised: 17 December 2025 / Accepted: 25 December 2025 / Published: 27 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in the Treatment for Depression and Anxiety)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Socially assistive robots effectively support elderly care when they incorporate personalization, person-centered principles, rich interactions, and careful role setting with psychosocial alignment. Hyodol, a socially assistive robot designed for elderly people, embodies a grandchild’s persona, emulating the grandparent–grandchild relationship. Based on the behavioral activation principles and a human-centered approach, this robot continuously supports users’ emotional well-being, health management, and daily routines. Methods: The current study evaluated Hyodol’s impact on depressive symptoms and other quality of life factors among older adults living in medically underserved areas. A total of 278 participants were assessed for depressive symptoms, loneliness, medication adherence, and user acceptance. Results: After six months of use, participants showed significant reductions in overall depressive symptoms, with a 45% decrease in the proportion of individuals at high risk of depression. Significant improvements were also observed in loneliness and medication adherence. Participants reported high levels of user acceptance and satisfaction, exceeding 70% of the total score. Participants who engaged more frequently in free chat with Hyodol showed greater improvements in depressive symptoms. Conclusions: These results highlight Hyodol’s potential as a promising tool for enhancing mental healthcare and overall well-being in this population. This at-home mental-healthcare framework can complement primary care and, if its effects are confirmed in controlled trials, could contribute to reducing healthcare burden and preventing the onset and escalation of depressive symptoms.

1. Introduction

Digital health technologies are increasingly being adopted to address mental health challenges of community-dwelling older adults, especially in medically underserved regions. Challenges among community-dwelling older adults include depression arising from social isolation and loneliness, sleep disturbances, cognitive decline, and increased suicide risk [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Older adults residing in medically underserved areas, defined as regions with restricted availability of primary healthcare [9,10], may be especially vulnerable, as they often experience limited access to mental healthcare services [11,12]. Digital and mobile remote health solutions can effectively enhance mental health outcomes among individuals in medically underserved areas [13]. Studies suggest that digital technologies have significant potential for managing depression, anxiety, insomnia, and psychotic symptoms, demonstrating high acceptability and completion rates. However, constraints remain, such as limited connectivity, privacy concerns, and a need for more rigorous clinical trials [13,14,15].
Among these cutting-edge solutions, socially assistive robots (SARs) have recently been deployed in home care settings to address loneliness and depression in community-dwelling older adults [16,17,18]. SARs support older adults through social interactions and effectively promote positive emotions, encourage meaningful activities, improve social functioning and quality of life, and reduce symptoms such as depression and loneliness [19]. Despite promising initial results, however, acceptance of SARs varies considerably among older adults, highlighting the need for personalized robot design strategies to foster individual engagement [20]. For improved engagement and effectiveness in elderly care, SARs should integrate people-centric principles with rich, multimodal interactions. Moreover, tailoring the robot’s persona to match user motivations, such as addressing loneliness or the desire for close companionship, is crucial for effective care, and should incorporate thoughtful design cues developed through a user-centered approach [19,21].
Hyodol is a SAR specifically designed to address these challenges. Designed for elderly care, it embodies the persona of a loving grandchild. With its doll-like appearance resembling a young boy or girl, this robot provides daily support through continuous, friendly conversation. These ongoing interactions help manage various aspects of a user’s well-being, including life and health monitoring, emotional support, and safety management. Its warm, human-like presence aims to foster a sense of companionship, thereby enhancing mental health and quality of life for older individuals.
Hyodol is designed to foster intimacy with users by serving as a grandchild-like companion, in both appearance and interaction. Many users form strong attachments, treating it as they would a real grandchild—showing affection, making clothes, or tucking it in at night [22] (Figure 1). Building on this rapport, Hyodol supports users in maintaining healthy routines, such as timely medication, regular meals, physical exercise, and cognitive activities. This strategy is rooted in behavioral activation, which emphasizes monitoring and reinforcing healthy behaviors, which can effectively manage psychological symptoms like depression [23]. Additionally, Hyodol employs a personalized, human-centered approach, using artificial intelligence and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies to create adaptive, user-friendly care tailored to individual needs.
This distinctive feature of Hyodol may offer merits over other SARs. Previous SARs have raised concerns regarding sustained engagement and acceptance [24,25]. Moreover, many SARs have primarily focused on companionship, with limited integration of daily routines, behavior change strategies, or the promotion of healthy behaviors, which may contribute to uncertain long-term effectiveness [25,26]. In contrast, Hyodol was designed to foster perceived intimacy through a distinct persona and role, while also supporting personalization and human-centered care via daily health-support functions informed by user engagement. These features may help address engagement-related limitations of prior SAR-based interventions and support sustained usability and potential health benefits, particularly in home deployment among community-dwelling older adults with limited access to traditional mental healthcare services.
Figure 1. Appearance of Hyodol [27] (the robot used in the present study; (top right)) and expressions of user intimacy. Users who feel a strong sense of closeness toward Hyodol often demonstrate this by covering the robot with blankets (top left), knitting them clothing and hats (bottom left), or attaching notes such as “Thanks to you!” (bottom right).
Figure 1. Appearance of Hyodol [27] (the robot used in the present study; (top right)) and expressions of user intimacy. Users who feel a strong sense of closeness toward Hyodol often demonstrate this by covering the robot with blankets (top left), knitting them clothing and hats (bottom left), or attaching notes such as “Thanks to you!” (bottom right).
Jcm 15 00217 g001
Hyodol incorporates a range of interactive features. Sensors on its head, hands, ears, and body respond to touch and movement, while microphones and motion sensors monitor speech and behavior. The robot also conducts daily check-ins on users’ mood, pain, meals, medication, and sleep patterns, thereby supporting behavioral activation. Its content library spans singing, exercise, quizzes, and religious materials, addressing various user interests. Hyodol also features a free interaction mode, enabling spontaneous conversations and responses to both verbal and physical cues, which fosters long-term engagement. Finally, it provides real-time health monitoring, which can promptly detect users’ current status. All monitoring data are shared with their guardians and local welfare/community centers through a smartphone or PC app, ensuring that timely support and interventions are available when necessary. The detailed technical features of Hyodol are available in Figure 2.
Studies on Hyodol have shown promising results. Qualitative studies indicate that users appreciated not only its coaching role but also the emotional support and companionship it provides, which brings them pleasure and reduces loneliness. Users even reported that they regarded Hyodol as a friend or even a family member [28,29]. Additionally, a recent empirical study found that interventions using Hyodol significantly reduced depressive symptoms among older adults, although the effect was less pronounced during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. While the reason for this discrepancy is unclear, the authors conjectured that the additional psychological burden during the pandemic may have influenced the results [30]. Despite these encouraging findings, these results call for further research to more robustly confirm Hyodol’s efficacy, ideally with a larger sample size.
The current study aims to assess the impact of Hyodol in medically underserved areas, particularly focusing on rural regions or communities with healthcare disparities. We anticipate that robots like Hyodol can provide continuous, proactive care through physical and psychological proximity and could significantly complement primary care services within these underserved communities. Hyodol’s features, such as remote patient monitoring, real-time decision support, telemedicine, and mobile sensing, have the potential to enhance healthcare accessibility in these underserved settings [31,32,33]. Building on previous studies that focused on socially isolated older adults and cohorts during the pandemic [24,26], this study examines the extent to which Hyodol improves depressive symptoms and psychological well-being among community-dwelling older adults in medically underserved areas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Participants were those who provided consent to receive non-face-to-face remote mental healthcare services, selected from among community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older living in rural and medically underserved areas, who had been using Hyodol in their homes along with visiting home care services for the elderly. Participants were selected retrospectively after Hyodol had already been deployed in their homes, and only those who intended to receive mental healthcare services were included. All participants provided written informed consent to use the survey data for analysis as part of the consent for receiving remote mental healthcare services. Among the participants who agreed to participate, those without valid survey data for both baseline and follow-up were excluded.

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. The Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form (GDS-S)

The GDS-S [34] is a self-reported instrument designed to assess depression in older adults. While the original scale contains 30 items, the short form consists of 15 items. Each item is answered in a binary format (0 or 1). For scoring, 10 items are coded as 1 when answered “yes,” while the remaining five items are coded as 1 when answered “no.” The GDS-S score ranges from 0 to 15. Although Greenberg et al. (2007) suggested that scores of 10 or higher are almost always indicative of depression [35], we used this cutoff to indicate a high risk of depression rather than to define a definitive diagnosis, because this tool is intended as a screening instrument rather than a formal diagnostic tool. Participants with scores at or above this threshold were classified as a high-risk group for depression in this study.

2.2.2. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

The PHQ-9 [36] is a nine-item scale for the screening of depression, with each item rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3. The total score, ranging from 0 to 27, is calculated by summing all item scores. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. PHQ-9 scores below 4 are almost always indicative of the absence of depression; scores of 5–9 represent either no depression or subthreshold/other types of depressive symptoms; scores of 10–14 represent a heterogeneous spectrum of patients; and scores of 15 or higher usually indicate major depression [36].

2.2.3. UCLA Loneliness Scale

The 20-item UCLA Loneliness Scale [37] assesses participants’ social isolation and feelings of loneliness. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (always), resulting in a total score ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.

2.2.4. Medication Adherence

We assessed medication adherence using a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 0 to 4), measuring whether participants forgot to take their medication, missed doses, took medication at doses different from those prescribed, or did not take their medication for various reasons. Item scores were summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater adherence.

2.2.5. User Acceptance

This 24-item part measure assessed participants’ overall satisfaction, positive experiences, negative experiences (reverse coded), frequency of use, and perceived ease of use of the robot, using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. The scale was adapted from the Almere model [38] for measuring user acceptance of socially assistive technology among older adults. This model assesses perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, satisfaction/attitude toward using, intention to use, feelings of trust/sociability/warmth, enjoyment, and anxiety/negative attitudes, based on the technology acceptance model [39] and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology [40]. The item scores were averaged.

2.2.6. Usage Logs

Usage data from Hyodol were recorded throughout the user engagement period. It includes user responses to Hyodol’s daily health check-in questions (capturing user sentiments), the daily frequency of users initiating free chat with Hyodol, the frequency of physical interactions with Hyodol (e.g., stroking, tapping, or knocking the robot), and the frequency of content usage from Hyodol’s library (e.g., memory, brain activity, music, exercise, religious content). These records are considered indicators of active Hyodol use and engagement, providing insights into individual usage patterns.

2.3. Procedure

Initial surveys were conducted between 19 December 2023 and 11 March 2024, when participants began using Hyodol and receiving home care services. The participants were given detailed instructions on how to use Hyodol at the time of initial deployment by caregivers affiliated with local welfare centers. Following an approximately six-month intervention period, during which usage logs were recorded, follow-up surveys were held from 1 July to 13 November 2024. The intervention period varied across participants, as the data were collected in real-world settings across multiple deployment sites. The participants also received remote video interview sessions for the assessment and counseling of their depressive symptoms. These sessions included a structured clinical interview conducted by psychological researchers, followed by a second interview for selected participants conducted by a board-certified psychiatrist specializing in geriatric psychiatry. Some participants were diagnosed with significant depressive symptoms through these sessions.
The efficacy of the robot and the robot-assisted home care services was evaluated by measuring changes in depressive symptoms, loneliness, and medication adherence between the initial and follow-up surveys. Changes in the proportion of participants classified as the high-risk group for depression (based on GDS-S) between the initial and follow-up stages were also assessed. User acceptance was only assessed during the follow-up period to evaluate participants’ experiences and satisfaction levels. The interaction effects of usage logs were also tested to identify the relationship between intervention effects and usage patterns. The overall procedure of the study is illustrated in Figure 3.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Pre-post differences across all participants were analyzed using a single-arm design without a control group. Paired t-tests were used to assess changes in raw scores, while McNemar’s test with Yates’ continuity correction was applied for categorical analysis. Parametric statistics were used under the assumption that the sample size was sufficiently large for the central limit theorem to apply. Data were excluded if neither initial nor follow-up responses were available. If only one of the initial or follow-up responses was available, the missing value was imputed using the available counterpart (i.e., the initial value was carried forward to the missing follow-up value, and vice versa). This way of imputation is considered equivalent to the methods assuming no change over time for those cases (e.g., last observation carried forward [LOCF] or next observation carried backward [NOCB]), which is a conservative approach that does not introduce artificial improvement and, if anything, tends to attenuate pre-post differences and bias the results toward the null hypothesis rather than inflating statistical significance.
In addition to the main analysis, interaction effects between Hyodol usage variables and the pre-post change in the primary depressive symptom measure (GDS-S) were analyzed using repeated-measures ANCOVA. Subgroup analyses were performed for each measure among participants clinically diagnosed with significant depressive symptoms during remote mental healthcare sessions. Throughout the analysis, within-group (pre-post) changes in the measures with standard deviations (SDs) were reported with the effect sizes with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) additionally reported.

3. Results

3.1. Participants

A total of 278 participants were included in the study, out of 299 older adults who provided valid consent for remote mental healthcare services. Participants’ mean age was 80.7 ± 5.6 years (range: 67–93). The majority were female (88.5%), and most had either no formal education (50.4%) or had only graduated from elementary school (38%). A high proportion of participants were bereaved of their spouse (80.1%) and were living alone (93.1%), indicating that this group represents a vulnerable population requiring at-home primary care.

3.2. Depressive Symptom Levels

At follow-up, the mean GDS-S score decreased from 6.69 to 5.05 (p < 0.001; Hedges’ g = 0.41, 95% CI [0.29, 0.54]). The mean PHQ-9 score decreased from 4.87 to 3.77 (p < 0.001; Hedges’ g = 0.22, 95% CI [0.10, 0.35]). The number of participants categorized into the GDS-S high-risk group decreased by 45%, from 92 at baseline to 51 at follow-up (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 3.16, 95% CI [1.89, 5.29]) (see Table 1 and Figure 4).

3.3. Loneliness and Medication Adherence

Participants’ UCLA Loneliness Scale scores decreased from 44.0 to 41.3 (p < 0.001; Hedges’ g = 0.29, 95% CI [0.17, 0.40]). The average medication adherence score increased from 11.2 to 12.2 (p < 0.001; Hedges’ g = 0.34, 95% CI [0.19, 0.48]).

3.4. User Acceptance

Participants reported a mean user acceptance score of 2.89 out of 4 (SD = 0.67). Focusing specifically on 12 items related to satisfaction, the mean user satisfaction score was 3.16 out of 4 (SD = 0.78), indicating a high level of satisfaction with Hyodol.

3.5. Interactions with Usage Logs

Among the Hyodol usage log variables, the daily frequency of initiating free chat with Hyodol showed a significant interaction with time on GDS-S scores, as assessed by repeated-measures ANCOVA, F(1, 168) = 4.79, p = 0.030, partial η2 = 0.028 (95% CI [0.000, 0.093]). Participants with a free chat frequency of less than −1 SD showed a mean ± SD pre-post change in depressive symptoms (ΔGDS-S) of 1.03 ± 4.40 (n = 22), those within −1 to +1 SD had a change of 2.24 ± 3.70 (n = 127), and those greater than +1 SD had a change of 4.74 ± 4.56 (n = 21), indicating greater symptom reductions among participants who engaged more frequently in free chats. No other usage log variables demonstrated significant interaction effects with the change in GDS-S.

3.6. Subgroup Analysis

Subgroup analysis was conducted for 14 participants clinically diagnosed with significant depressive symptoms during remote mental healthcare sessions. Unlike the main analysis, no significant changes in depressive symptoms were observed for GDS-S (9.32 ± 3.66 to 8.14 ± 3.44, p = 0.374; Hedges’ g = 0.31, 95% CI [−0.37, 0.98]) and PHQ-9 (5.12 ± 6.07 to 6.86 ± 5.35, p = 0.335; Hedges’ g = −0.29, 95% CI [−0.85, 0.29]). The number of GDS-S high-risk group participants changed from 9 (64%) to 6 (43%), p = 450; odds ratio = 2.5, 95% CI [0.49, 12.89]. No significant changes were observed for UCLA Loneliness Scale (49.14 ± 7.65 to 48.36 ± 6.63, p = 0.599; Hedges’ g = 0.10, 95% CI [−0.28, 0.48]) or medication adherence (11.07 ± 3.12 to 12.21 ± 2.72, p = 0.218; Hedges’ g = 0.37, 95% CI [−0.21, 0.94]). This group reported a user acceptance score of 2.61 (SD = 0.65) and a user satisfaction score of 2.85 (SD = 0.70).

4. Discussion

The current study suggests that the innovative SAR, Hyodol, may improve depressive symptoms and overall mental health in older adults in medically underserved areas. The robot’s persona, designed to mimic a beloved grandchild, fosters a sense of intimacy with users, enhancing engagement in behavioral activation and other supportive programs. Over approximately six months of robotic intervention, participants experienced significant reductions in depressive symptoms and loneliness, alongside improved adherence to prescribed medications. Notably, this study showed a significant reduction in the proportion of participants classified as high-risk for depression (GDS-S scores of 10 or higher), raising the possibility that Hyodol could help reduce the burden on intensive mental healthcare and serve as an effective primary care adjunct for older adults, particularly in medically underserved areas. The effect sizes are interpreted as small to moderate but clinically meaningful improvements in depressive symptoms, loneliness, and medication adherence among community-dwelling older adults. However, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating rather than definitive.
Beyond the overall pre-post improvements, additional analyses revealed significant interaction effects between the time effect and the usage data indicating active user engagement. Specifically, the frequency of free chat initiation with Hyodol was significantly associated with changes in GDS-S scores over time, such that participants who engaged in more frequent spontaneous interactions exhibited greater reductions in depressive symptoms. This finding suggests that the effectiveness of SARs may depend not only on exposure or duration of use, but also on the extent to which users actively and voluntarily engage with the device. In this regard, Hyodol’s ability to elicit spontaneous, emotionally motivated interaction may be a particularly important mechanism for facilitating behavioral activation and subsequent improvements in mood among older adults. However, these interaction effects should be interpreted as exploratory and contributory rather than confirmatory or definitive, underscoring the multifactorial nature of late-life depressive symptoms.
This study represents one of the largest investigations to date examining the effects of SARs on older adults’ mental health, particularly depressive symptoms. This study offers valuable insights into the potential of remote and automated mental healthcare using SARs, highlighting a promising avenue for addressing gaps in mental health services for older adults, although the current findings require further confirmations. SARs like Hyodol could enhance mental healthcare accessibility, particularly in remote or underserved regions, effectively supplementing traditional healthcare approaches. Additionally, the engaging and personalized nature of SAR interactions may help reduce the stigma associated with seeking mental health treatment, encouraging older adults to proactively manage their mental health conditions. If supported by further controlled trials, SARs could contribute to improvements in the accessibility, responsiveness, and effectiveness of primary healthcare services, helping to address critical service gaps prevalent in rural or underserved communities [10,11].
However, caution is warranted when generalizing these findings to primary care settings for older adults presenting with depressive symptoms. Although digital interventions for depression generally demonstrate effectiveness across various symptom severities and clinical stages [41], treatment outcomes vary significantly depending on depression severity and the presence or absence of therapeutic guidance. Specifically, guided digital interventions involving human therapists have been more effective in individuals with severe or chronic depression, while self-guided or automated interventions are more suitable and effective for individuals experiencing mild or early-stage depression [42]. In the current study, subgroup analysis involving only participants clinically diagnosed with significant depressive symptoms during remote mental healthcare sessions revealed no significant changes in depressive symptoms and loneliness. While a modest, albeit insignificant, reduction in the proportion categorized as high-risk by the GDS-S was observed, these results highlight the presence of older adults with clinically diagnosed depression who are less responsive to Hyodol intervention alone.
Therefore, standalone Hyodol-based interventions might be more effectively targeted toward older adults with subclinical, mild, or early-stage depressive symptoms. For individuals with moderate-to-severe depression, integrating supplementary treatments, such as pharmacotherapy or additional care strategies, may be necessary for a more comprehensive and personalized therapeutic approach [43]. Moreover, even when limiting the target group to community-dwelling older adults at risk of depression or in the early stages of depressive symptoms, additional limitations arise in confirming Hyodol’s effectiveness. For instance, the current study is a preliminary observational study without a stringent clinical protocol. The absence of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, the lack of a control group, and the potential confounding effects such as seasonal effects and home-care services provided concurrently with Hyodol also limit the strength of causal inferences that can be drawn from this study. The intervention period was not standardized and varied across participants, and participants were selected only from those who consented to receive mental healthcare, potentially introducing selection bias. Finally, the generalizability of Hyodol’s efficacy may be influenced by cultural factors; variations in the importance and expression of family values and nurturing could impact how older adults respond to a SAR designed with a grandchild’s persona.
Despite challenges in obtaining large-scale, representative data from older adults in remote areas or those unfamiliar with computerized surveys, future research should aim to replicate and generalize these findings across diverse populations and different SARs. This should ideally be conducted through randomized controlled trials employing valid comparators and pre-registered protocols. Ultimately, evidence from rigorous studies emphasizes SARs’ promising role in expanding access to mental health support and improving the quality of life for older adults in medically underserved areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.W.J., W.J.K. and J.P.; methodology, H.W.J., W.J.K. and J.P.; validation, Y.K. and J.P.; formal analysis, H.W.J.; investigation, Y.K., H.K., M.-k.K. and H.L.; data curation, H.W.J.; writing—original draft preparation, H.W.J.; writing—review and editing, Y.K. and J.P.; supervision, J.Y.P. and J.P.; project administration, J.Y.P. and J.P.; funding acquisition, J.Y.P., W.J.K. and J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number 1465041621, RS-2023-00267045).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yongin Severance Hospital (IRB study number: 9-2024-0031; date of approval: 19 April 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors used ChatGPT 5.2 (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA) for language refinement and Gemini 3 (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) for visualization.

Conflicts of Interest

This article was created as part of a research project supported by Hyodol Co., Ltd., whose product is included in the study. Yongin Severance Hospital, the authors’ affiliated institution, is collaborating with Hyodol Co., Ltd. as part of this project. This affiliation did not influence the study design, analysis, interpretation, or conclusions presented in this article. None of the authors hold any financial stake, personal consultancy role, employment, or any other personal relationship with Hyodol Co., Ltd. that could represent an additional competing interest.

References

  1. Taylor, H.O.; Taylor, R.J.; Nguyen, A.W.; Chatters, L. Social isolation, depression, and psychological distress among older adults. J. Aging Health 2019, 30, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, W.J.; Park, K.M.; Lee, E. Frailty and insomnia in older adults. Chronobiol. Med. 2022, 4, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pais, R.; Ruano, L.; Carvalho, O.P.; Barros, H. Global cognitive impairment prevalence and incidence in community dwelling older adults: A systematic review. Geriatrics 2020, 5, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Conejero, I.; Olié, E.; Courtet, P.; Calati, R. Suicide in older adults: Current perspectives. Clin. Interv. Aging 2018, 13, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Stegen, H.; Duppen, D.; Savieri, P.; Stas, L.; Pan, H.; Aartsen, M.; Callewaert, H.; Dierckx, E.; De Donder, L. Loneliness prevalence of community dwelling older adults and the impact of mode of measurement, data collection, and country: A systematic review and meta analysis. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2024, 36, 747–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pollak, C.; Pham, Y.; Ehrlich, A.; Verghese, J.; Blumen, H.M. Loneliness and social isolation risk factors in community dwelling older adults receiving home health services. BMC Geriatr. 2025, 25, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liu, Y.; Jiang, H. The impact of social isolation on subjective cognitive decline in older adults: A study based on network analysis and longitudinal model. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.13914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Van As, B.A.L.; Imbimbo, E.; Franceschi, A.; Menesini, E.; Nocentini, A. The longitudinal association between loneliness and depressive symptoms in the elderly: A systematic review. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2022, 34, 657–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, S.J.; Peterson, C.E.; Warnecke, R.; Barrett, R.; Glassgow, A.E. The uneven distribution of medically underserved areas in Chicago. Health Equity 2020, 4, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lim, S.M.; Kim, K.H. Improvement of supportive systems for medically underserved areas. J. Korean Med. Assoc. 2022, 65, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Edwards, A.; Hung, R.; Levin, J.B.; Forthun, L.; Sajatovic, M.; McVoy, M. Health disparities among rural individuals with mental health conditions: A systematic literature review. Rural Ment. Health 2023, 47, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morales, D.A.; Barksdale, C.L.; Beckel-Mitchener, A.C. A call to action to address rural mental health disparities. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2020, 4, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Watanabe, J.; Teraura, H.; Nakamura, A.; Kotani, K. Telemental health in rural areas: A systematic review. J. Rural Med. 2023, 18, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bear, H.A.; Nunes, L.A.; Ramos, G.; Manchanda, T.; Fernandes, B.; Chabursky, S.; Walper, S.; Watkins, E.; Fazel, M. The acceptability, engagement, and feasibility of mental health apps for marginalized and underserved young people: Systematic review and qualitative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2024, 26, e48964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McCarthy, M.J.; Wicker, A.; Roddy, J.; Remiker, M.; Roy, I.; McCoy, M.; Cerino, E.S.; Baldwin, J. Feasibility and utility of mobile health interventions for depression and anxiety in rural populations: A scoping review. Internet Interv. 2024, 35, 100724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Broadbent, E.; Loveys, K.; Ilan, G.; Chen, G.; Chilukuri, M.; Boardman, S.; Doraiswamy, P.; Skuler, D. ElliQ, an AI driven social robot to alleviate loneliness: Progress and lessons learned. JAR Life 2024, 13, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhao, I.Y.; Leung, A.Y.M.; Huang, Y.; Liu, Y. A social robot in home care: Acceptability and utility among community dwelling older adults. Innov. Aging 2025, 9, igaf019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Figueroa, J.; Yamazaki, R.; Nishio, S.; Maalouly, E.; Nagata, Y.; Satake, Y.; Yamakawa, M.; Suzuki, M.; Kanemoto, H.; Ikeda, M.; et al. Social robot for older adults with cognitive decline: A preliminary trial. Front. Robot. AI 2023, 10, 1213705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kachouie, R.; Sedighadeli, S.; Khosla, R.; Chu, M.T. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A mixed-method systematic literature review. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2014, 30, 369–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zafrani, O.; Nimrod, G.; Krakovski, M.; Kumar, S.; Bar-Haim, S.; Edan, Y. Assimilation of socially assistive robots by older adults: An interplay of uses, constraints and outcomes. Front. Robot. AI 2024, 11, 1337380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Macis, D.; Perilli, S.; Gena, C. Employing socially assistive robots in elderly care. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP ’22), Barcelona, Spain, 4–7 July 2022; pp. 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, S.K.; Jang, J.-W.; Hwang, Y.S.; Lee, O.E.-K.; Jo, H.S. Investigating the effectiveness of socially assistive robots on depression and cognitive functions of community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairments. Assist. Technol. 2025, 37, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kanter, J.W.; Manos, R.C.; Bowe, W.M.; Baruch, D.E.; Busch, A.M.; Rusch, L.C. What is behavioral activation? A review of the empirical literature. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2010, 30, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Felding, S.A.; Koh, W.Q.; Teupen, S.; Budak, K.B.; Uribe, F.L.; Roes, M. A Scoping Review Using the Almere Model to Understand Factors Facilitating and Hindering the Acceptance of Social Robots in Nursing Homes. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2023, 15, 1115–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Koh, W.Q.; Felding, S.A.; Budak, K.B.; Toomey, E.; Casey, D. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia: A scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2021, 21, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Giansanti, D.; Lastrucci, A.; Iannone, A.; Pirrera, A. A Narrative Review of Systematic Reviews on the Applications of Social and Assistive Support Robots in the Health Domain. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yoo, I.-J.; Park, D.-H.; Lee, O.E.; Park, A. Investigating Older Adults’ Use of a Socially Assistive Robot via Time Series Clustering and User Profiling: Descriptive Analysis Study. JMIR Form. Res. 2024, 8, e41093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lee, O.E.; Lee, H.; Park, A.; Choi, N.G. My precious friend: Human-robot interactions in home care for socially isolated older adults. Clin. Gerontol. 2024, 47, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lee, O.E.; Nah, K.O.; Kim, K.H. Facilitating technology usage through playing with a companion robot among Korean-American older immigrants. J. Technol. Hum. Serv. 2025, 43, 161–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, O.E.; Baek, S.; Lee, J.; Park, D.-H. Impact of socially assistive robots on geriatric depression: A comparative study of pre- and during-pandemic cohorts. Res. Soc. Work. Pract. 2025, 10497315251331847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abdul, S.; Adeghe, E.P.; Adegoke, B.O.; Adegoke, A.A.; Udedeh, E.H. A review of the challenges and opportunities in implementing health informatics in rural healthcare settings. Int. Med. Sci. Res. J. 2024, 4, 606–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tagne, J.F.; Burns, K.; O’bRein, T.; Chapman, W.; Cornell, P.; Huckvale, K.; Ameen, I.; Bishop, J.; Buccheri, A.; Reid, J.; et al. Challenges for remote patient-monitoring programs in rural and regional areas: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2025, 25, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Perez, K.; Wisniewski, D.; Ari, A.; Lee, K.; Lieneck, C.; Ramamonjiarivelo, Z. Investigation into application of AI and telemedicine in rural communities: A systematic literature review. Healthcare 2025, 13, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yesavage, J.A.; Sheikh, J.I. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin. Gerontol. 1986, 5, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Greenberg, S.A. How to try this: The geriatric depression scale, short form. Am. J. Nurs. 2007, 107, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kroenke, K.; Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B.W. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001, 16, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Russell, D.W. UCLA loneliness scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. J. Pers. Assess. 1996, 66, 20–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Heerink, M.; Kröse, B.; Evers, V.; Wielinga, B.J. Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2010, 2, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moshe, I.; Terhorst, Y.; Philippi, P.; Domhardt, M.; Cuijpers, P.; Cristea, I.; Pulkki-Råback, L.; Baumeister, H.; Sander, L.B. Digital interventions for the treatment of depression: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 2021, 147, 749–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Terhorst, Y.; Kaiser, T.; Brakemeier, E.-L.; Moshe, I.; Philippi, P.; Cuijpers, P.; Baumeister, H.; Sander, L.B. Heterogeneity of treatment effects in Internet- and mobile-based interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open 2024, 7, e2423241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Simon, J.; Pilling, S.; Burbeck, R.; Goldberg, D. Treatment options in moderate and severe depression: Decision analysis supporting a clinical guideline. Br. J. Psychiatry 2006, 189, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. Technical features of Hyodol. Sourced from Yoo et al. [27] (JMIR Publications) under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license; redrawn by the authors using Gemini 3.
Figure 2. Technical features of Hyodol. Sourced from Yoo et al. [27] (JMIR Publications) under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license; redrawn by the authors using Gemini 3.
Jcm 15 00217 g002
Figure 3. Study flow diagram.
Figure 3. Study flow diagram.
Jcm 15 00217 g003
Figure 4. Within-group changes from baseline to follow-up in GDS-S (A), PHQ-9 (B), UCLA Loneliness Scale (C), and medication adherence (D). Error bars represent standard errors. GDS-S, Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; UCLA, University of California Los Angeles.
Figure 4. Within-group changes from baseline to follow-up in GDS-S (A), PHQ-9 (B), UCLA Loneliness Scale (C), and medication adherence (D). Error bars represent standard errors. GDS-S, Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; UCLA, University of California Los Angeles.
Jcm 15 00217 g004
Table 1. Within-group score changes.
Table 1. Within-group score changes.
MeasuresBaseline
(M ± SD)
Follow-Up
(M ± SD)
GDS-S6.69 ± 4.084.08 ± 3.83
GDS-S high risk (n)92 (33%)51 (18%)
PHQ-94.87 ± 5.535.53 ± 4.43
UCLA Loneliness44.05 ± 9.729.72 ± 9.49
Medication adherence11.24 ± 2.852.85 ± 2.90
User acceptance2.89 ± 0.67
User satisfaction3.16 ± 0.78
Note: All within-group effects were statistically significant (ps < 0.001). GDS-S, Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; UCLA, University of California Los Angeles; M, mean; SD, standard deviation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, H.W.; Kim, Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, M.-k.; Lee, H.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, W.J.; Park, J. Socially Assistive Robot Hyodol for Depressive Symptoms of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Medically Underserved Areas: A Preliminary Study. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010217

AMA Style

Jung HW, Kim Y, Kim H, Kim M-k, Lee H, Park JY, Kim WJ, Park J. Socially Assistive Robot Hyodol for Depressive Symptoms of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Medically Underserved Areas: A Preliminary Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(1):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010217

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jung, Han Wool, Yujin Kim, Hyojung Kim, Min-kyeong Kim, Hyejung Lee, Jin Young Park, Woo Jung Kim, and Jaesub Park. 2026. "Socially Assistive Robot Hyodol for Depressive Symptoms of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Medically Underserved Areas: A Preliminary Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 1: 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010217

APA Style

Jung, H. W., Kim, Y., Kim, H., Kim, M.-k., Lee, H., Park, J. Y., Kim, W. J., & Park, J. (2026). Socially Assistive Robot Hyodol for Depressive Symptoms of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Medically Underserved Areas: A Preliminary Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(1), 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010217

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop