Next Article in Journal
Medial Thigh Lift with Tumescent Local Anesthesia: Advancing Outpatient Body Contouring
Previous Article in Journal
Bispecific Radioligands (BRLs): Two Is Better than One
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel in the Contemporary Management Through Invasive or Non-Invasive Strategies of Elderly Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndromes

by
Anum Nazir
1,
Smrthi Shetty Ujjar
1,
Seemi Saba
1,
Neil Ruparelia
2,
Nicos Spyrou
2 and
Lampson Fan
1,3,*
1
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK
2
Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading RG1 5AN, UK
3
University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2T, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(16), 5629; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165629
Submission received: 10 June 2025 / Revised: 30 July 2025 / Accepted: 6 August 2025 / Published: 8 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Clinical Advances in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)

Abstract

Background: ESC recommends ticagrelor over clopidogrel for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) but the lack of evidence for elderly patients (≥75) and concerns over bleeding has led to significant variability in its use within the UK. Our aim is, therefore, to compare the safety of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in real-world elderly patients admitted with ACS and managed either medically or through percutaneous intervention. Methods: Unselected elderly patients (≥75) admitted to Royal Berkshire Hospital with ACS (2013–2015) were identified and followed for 1 year. The primary outcomes were bleeding events (TIMI criteria), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, angina, NSTEMI and STEMI. Results: A total of 288 patients with ACS were discharged with aspirin and either clopidogrel (137) or ticagrelor (151). In total, 152 of these patients underwent invasive angiography and revascularization. The baseline clinical characteristics and crusade bleeding score were similar between the groups receiving ticagrelor or clopidogrel. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (8.8% vs. 10.6%), cardiovascular mortality (2.9% vs. 2.0%), ischemic stroke (0.7% vs. 2.0%), angina (6.6% vs. 5.3%) or STEMI (2.2% vs. 1.3%). Patients on clopidogrel, however, had increased events of NSTEMI compared to ticagrelor (8.0% vs. 2.0%, OR 4.481, 95% CI 1.223–16.42) and overall MI (10.2% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.030). No difference was observed in either major (8.8 vs. 8.6%) or minor TIMI bleeding (18.2% vs. 20.5%) and after propensity score matching (minor bleeding p = 0.39, major bleeding p = 0.76). Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, ticagrelor did not increase major or fatal bleeding compared to clopidogrel in elderly patients. In view of the mortality benefit in the large trials, additional cardiovascular benefit of ticagrelor should not be withheld on the basis of age as a perceived risk factor for bleeding in ACS.
Keywords: ACS; ticagrelor; bleeding; elderly patients ACS; ticagrelor; bleeding; elderly patients

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nazir, A.; Shetty Ujjar, S.; Saba, S.; Ruparelia, N.; Spyrou, N.; Fan, L. Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel in the Contemporary Management Through Invasive or Non-Invasive Strategies of Elderly Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndromes. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 5629. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165629

AMA Style

Nazir A, Shetty Ujjar S, Saba S, Ruparelia N, Spyrou N, Fan L. Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel in the Contemporary Management Through Invasive or Non-Invasive Strategies of Elderly Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndromes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(16):5629. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165629

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nazir, Anum, Smrthi Shetty Ujjar, Seemi Saba, Neil Ruparelia, Nicos Spyrou, and Lampson Fan. 2025. "Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel in the Contemporary Management Through Invasive or Non-Invasive Strategies of Elderly Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndromes" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 16: 5629. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165629

APA Style

Nazir, A., Shetty Ujjar, S., Saba, S., Ruparelia, N., Spyrou, N., & Fan, L. (2025). Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel in the Contemporary Management Through Invasive or Non-Invasive Strategies of Elderly Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndromes. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(16), 5629. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165629

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop