Next Article in Journal
Selective Separation of Singly Charged Chloride and Dihydrogen Phosphate Anions by Electrobaromembrane Method with Nanoporous Membranes
Next Article in Special Issue
Thin-Film Nanocomposite (TFN) Membranes for Water Treatment Applications: Characterization and Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Modulation of the Dipole Potential of Model Lipid Membranes with Phytochemicals: Molecular Mechanisms, Structure–Activity Relationships, and Implications in Reconstituted Ion Channels
Previous Article in Special Issue
Production of Drinking Water with Membranes with Simultaneous Utilization of Concentrate and Reject Effluent after Sludge Dewatering
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/membranes13050454
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use of Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM Supernatant as a Cleaning Agent for Reverse-Osmosis Membranes (ROMs) from a Desalination Plant in Northern Chile Affected by Biofouling

by
Hernán Vera-Villalobos
1,
Carlos Riquelme
1 and
Fernando Silva-Aciares
1,2,*
1
Centro de Bioinnovación, Facultad de Ciencias del mar y Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Avenida Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
2
Departamento de Biotecnología, Universidad de Antofagasta, Avenida Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2023, 13(5), 454; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13050454
Submission received: 30 March 2023 / Revised: 14 April 2023 / Accepted: 20 April 2023 / Published: 22 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Desalination Based on Membrane Technologies)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Biofouling refers to the undesirable growth of microorganisms on water-submerged surfaces. Microfouling, the initial state of biofouling, is characterized by aggregates of microbial cells enclosed in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs). In seawater desalination plants, filtration systems, such as reverse-osmosis membranes (ROMs), are affected by microfouling, which decreases their efficiency in obtaining permeate water. The existing chemical and physical treatments are expensive and ineffective; therefore, controlling microfouling on ROMs is a considerable challenge. Thus, new approaches are necessary to improve the current ROM cleaning treatments. This study demonstrates the application of Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant as a cleaning agent for ROMs in a desalination seawater plant in northern Chile (Aguas Antofagasta S.A.), which is responsible for supplying drinking water to the city of Antofagasta. ROMs treated with Altermonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant exhibited statistically significant results (p < 0.05) in terms of seawater permeability (Pi), permeability recovery (PR), and the conductivity of permeated water compared with control biofouling ROMs and those treated with the chemical cleaning protocol applied by the Aguas Antofagasta S.A. desalination plant.

1. Introduction

Biofouling is the undesirable growth of microorganisms on water-submerged equipment, infrastructure, or surfaces [1,2]. The initial state of biofouling, known as microfouling, is characterized by aggregates of microbial cells enclosed in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) [3,4]. EPSs function as a primary settlement for bacteria and diatoms, consequently leading to the colonization of other biofouling components, such as macroalgae spores and invertebrate larvae [4]. Depending on the affected industry (such as aquaculture or desalination plants for water consumption), biofouling can severely affect important operations, resulting in physical damage, biological competitiveness, cultivation system deformation, and environmental modifications, leading to higher economic costs [5].
Biofouling is one of the major problems affecting seawater desalination plants. Biofouling negatively affects the water quality of filtration system products, such as reverse-osmosis membranes (ROMs), through biofilm-enhanced concentration polarization (BECP) and enhanced solute passage, resulting in an increased number of pretreatment steps [6]. Maddah and Chogle (2016) [7] indicated that the primary consequences of biofouling in RO systems are decreased membrane flux and biodegradation, increased salt passage and differential pressure and feed pressure, higher energy requirements, more-frequent chemical cleaning, and a severe decline in permeate quality, thus increasing production costs.
Since the existing chemical and physical treatments are expensive and ineffective, controlling microfouling on ROMs is a considerable challenge. It damages ROM structures, thus producing mechanical interference and a decrease in the permeability of seawater [8,9]. According to Goh et al. (2018) [10], mitigating biofouling in the desalination industry worldwide would cost more than USD 15 billion annually. These adverse effects and the high cost of chemical treatments have resulted in the use of biological molecules as a novel strategy to prevent biofilm formation [11,12] compared with the current antifouling approaches, which are expensive and toxic to the immediate environment and treated surfaces.
Biological approaches have been proposed to solve this problem, such as the use of molecules with quorum-quenching activity, isolated enzymes, and the use of bacterial supernatants with mixes of enzymatic activities [13,14,15]. Quorum quenching aims to inhibit communication between bacteria, preventing their settlement, which generates fouling [15,16]; on the other hand, the use of isolated enzymes or bacterial supernatants is intended to be applied as a ROM-cleaning treatment, either by eliminating the bacterial component [17,18] or degrading the EPS that allows biological settlement [19]. Among these enzymes, those with high potential for use are: alginate lyase, which is capable of degrading EPS polysaccharides, mitigating biofouling formation [20], and xanthine oxidase, which has the ability to produce superoxide anions [21]. On the other hand, enzyme mixes, such as trypsin-EDTA, proteinase K, α-amylase, β-mannosidase, and alginate lyase, have been proposed as an alternative to degrade different biofouling components [22]. However, many of these approximations have only been evaluated on a laboratory scale, which does not allow a real estimation of their performance under conditions of high pressure, water flow, and temperature changes, which are characteristic of fully operational desalination plants [19,23].
Thus, if the use of these new technologies is effective, they could represent an eco-friendly product that decreases the operating costs of the cleaning procedures associated with ROMs maintenance [7]. In this context, the bacterial strain Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM [24], which produces a thermostable, extracellular, peptide-like compound, is highly significant. It exhibits inhibitory effects on the adhesion capabilities of certain planktonic species and marine benthic microorganisms involved in biofouling [24,25,26,27]. The previous results obtained by our group corroborate the finding that the antifouling compounds secreted by the marine bacteria Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM disrupt the matrix of the extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs), thus modifying the microbial communities observed in ROMs on a laboratory scale [26,27]. However, experiments performed under real conditions are necessary to corroborate the Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant’s cleaning effect on ROMs exposed to the pressure, temperature, and flux conditions that are normally used in reverse-osmosis plants. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of the supernatant obtained from Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM as a cleaning treatment for ROMs using the same conditions applied by Aguas Antofagasta S.A., a company dedicated to supplying drinking water through reverse-osmosis technology in the city of Antofagasta, Chile. The results show that the application of the supernatant obtained from Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM in the ROMs allows the considerable recovery of permeate production capacity, restoring the topography of the membranes under the pressure and flow conditions used in the seawater desalination industry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Culture Conditions of Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM and Supernatant Production

Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM [25] was grown for 4 days at 20 °C in a semi-continuous 5 L fermenter with M9 minimal saline medium (casamino acids 1 g/L, Na2HPO4 6 g/L, KH2PO4 3 g/L, NH4Cl 1 g/L, NaCl 21 g/L, 0.1 M MgSO4·7H2O 10 mL, 0.01 M CaCl2·2H2O 10 mL, vitamin B1 (1%) 0.2 mL, and glucose (20%) 20 mL) until the stationary phase was reached. Afterward, the culture was centrifuged at 8500 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. The supernatant was filtered in a tangential flow filtration system (Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany) with a 0.2 µm pore size (Hydrosart membrane, Sartorius AG) and stored at 4 °C until further use. For ROM cleaning treatments, the total protein concentration was determined using the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.2. Reverse Osmosis Membrane (ROM) Selection

A ROM model SWC6-LD Hydranautics system with 3.5 years of continuous operation was used in all experiments. The SWC6-LD is a seawater reverse-osmosis membrane manufactured by Hydranautics made of composite polyamide polymer and a low-fouling spiral-wound configuration with dimensions of 40 × 8 inches, and a performance of 12,000 gallons/day, 1200 PSI max pressure, <0.1 PPM of max chlorine concentration, and 45 °C of max operating temperature. ROMs were selected on the basis of the first membranes located in the RO system (Figure 1). The selection of these ROMs was made on the basis of the high biological presence of microfouling according to the operation protocols of Aguas Antofagasta, S.A. Hence, the mentioned membranes in the RO system were replaced by brand new ROMs once their lifetime expired (3.5 years). Aguas Antofagasta SA is a company in charge of purifying water in the town of Antofagasta, Chile. The desalination plant has an installed capacity of 1056 L per second, with an estimation of permeate recovery of 43–45%. To evaluate the effects of the Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant as a cleaning agent for ROMs, 42 cm2 sections were obtained from 3.5-year-old ROMs (SWC6-LD, Hydranautics, Oceanside, CA, USA) with homogeneous microfouling and kept in sterilized seawater at 4 °C until use. The brand-new ROM (SWC6-LD, Hydranautics) was used as a clean control.

2.3. ROM Cleaning Treatments

The cleaning protocol applied by Aguas Antofagasta S.A. was used with certain modifications (varying cleaning solutions), and it was escalated to the Sterlitech CF042 system. This consisted of the passage of different cleaning solutions for a total estimated time of 10 h at 58 psi (4 bar), with recirculation and rest cycles using the following steps:
First Rinse Step: Permeate water was recirculated for 15 min at 58 psi to eliminate the remaining salinity from ROM operations. Next, a solution of 0.1% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), pH 12, at 35 °C was recirculated for 5 min to eliminate salt precipitates.
Wash Step 1: The membranes were washed with an alkaline solution (sodium tripolyphosphate 0.67 w/v, EDTA 0.6% w/v, pH 12) at 35 °C, and 4 cycles consisting of 30 min of recirculation at 58 psi and 45 min of incubation were applied. After every cycle, the alkaline wash solution was replaced with a fresh solution with the same properties.
Second Rinse Step: After the alkaline wash step, ROMs were rinsed with permeate water for 15 min at 58 psi to eliminate the remnants from the previously applied alkaline solution.
Wash Step 1: The membranes were washed with an acid solution (1% citric acid w/v) at room temperature. In total, 3 cycles consisting of 30 min of recirculation at 58 psi and 45 min of incubation were applied. After every cycle, the acid wash solution was replaced with a fresh solution with the same properties.
Third Rinse Step: The last wash step was applied before assessing the performance. ROMs were rinsed with permeate water for 15 min at 58 psi to eliminate the remnants of the acid solution.
To evaluate the effects of the Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant as a cleaning agent for ROMs, treatments replacing alkali, acid, or both solutions with the supernatant (at a final concentration of 200 µg/mL of proteins in the supernatant) were applied and are listed in Table 1.

2.4. ROMs Performance Evaluation

ROMs previously cleaned with the respective treatments were placed in two cells of a CF042D crossflow RO system (Sterlitech, Auburn, WA, USA), and their performance was assessed for 15 h of continuous operation. To perform these experiments, pre-osmosis water from the Aguas Antofagasta operation plant was used (pH 7.69, SDI < 5, and 52,850 µS/cm of conductivity), and the operation conditions were similar to those applied by Aguas Antofagasta S.A. in their routine applications (water flux speed: 37.49 cm × seg−1, pressure: 825 psi, intake water temperature: 19–21 °C, water flux rate: 2 L/min).
To calculate seawater permeability (Pi), the permeate was obtained in a glass container positioned on a digital scale (IND131, Metler Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA), and the difference in the weight was monitored every hour for a total time of 15 h. Equation (1) was applied according to Nagaraj et al.’s work (2017) [11]:
P i = V A ∗ t ∗ ∆ P ,
where Pi is water permeability (L·m−2·h−1·bar−1), V is the volume in liters of the permeate obtained under constant pressure, P is the operating pressure (bar), t is time (h), and A is active ROM area (m2).
The average Pi values obtained during the experiments were used to estimate the permeability ratio according to Equation (2).
P e r m e a b i l i t y   r a t i o   ( P R ) = P i P c o n t r o l
where Pi is the permeability after the respective cleaning treatments and Pcontrol is the control related to a clean membrane (ROM-CT).
In addition, to observe membrane integrity and permeate water quality, conductivity (µS × cm−1) and pH were measured every hour in the pre-osmosis and permeate water during all experiments.

2.5. Evaluation of ROM Cleaning Treatments through AFM Microscopy

ROM sections of 1 × 1 cm that had been previously treated via the cleaning process mentioned above were evaluated using a model Raman-AFM Alpha300 atomic force microscope (AFM) coupled to a model DU970N-BV (EMCCD) CCD camera, and pictures from a 100 µm2 surface scan were taken to observe physical modifications.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The values were expressed as mean ± standard error (ES) using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA). The effect of Alteromonas sp. Ni1 LEM supernatant as a cleaning treatment was studied via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using STATGRAPHICS Centurion XV Professional (Statgraphics Technologies Inc., The Plains, VA, USA). The means were compared using multiple comparison tests of least significant differences (LSD; p ≤ 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Water Permeability after Cleaning Treatments

The results regarding the water permeability (Pi) over 15 h from ROMs treated with the different cleaning treatments (Table 1) used by the Aguas Antofagasta S.A. desalination plant are shown in Table 2. As expected, the highest ROMs seawater permeability for each hour sampled during the entire bioassay period (15 h) was obtained under the ROM-CT condition, as this was a brand-new ROM without exposure to biofouling (p < 0.05). The other treatments, in order of decreasing seawater permeability, were as follows: ROM-SN, ROM-QT, ROM-SN-QTac, ROM-QTAl-SN, ROM-M9, and fouled membranes without cleaning treatments (ROM-BF). In addition, the ROM-M9 treatment, corresponding to the bacterial culture medium containing Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM, was used. This treatment was carried out without the antifouling bioactive substance and exerted no antifouling effect; no significant differences were found (p < 0.05) compared with the ROM-BF condition. In contrast, when water permeability was compared between different ROM cleaning treatments, the results showed that during the 15 h of the experiment, the highest permeability was obtained in the ROM-SN treatment, a condition that corresponded to a cleaning procedure using only the bacterial supernatant (Table 2).

3.2. Permeability Ratios of Different Cleaning Treatments

The results of the permeability ratio (PR) measurements conducted over 15 h for ROMs treated with different cleaning treatments are shown in Table 3. The permeability ratio (PR) of each ROM was analyzed after cleaning treatments using ROM-CT as a reference (brand new ROM). The results showed that the treatment with the highest PR was the bacterial supernatant (ROM-SN) with a PR of 0.7205, followed, in decreasing order, by ROM-SN-QTac, ROM-QT, ROM-QTAl-SN, ROM-M9, and ROM-BF, with values of 0.6926, 0.6873, 0.6866, 0.5390, and 0.5310, respectively.
As observed in relation to the (Pi) values, when PR was compared between different ROM cleaning treatments, the PR results obtained after 15 h of experiments showed that the highest recovery was achieved by ROMs treated with the bacterial supernatant ROM-SN as a cleaning treatment (p < 0.05; Table 3). In contrast, no significant differences were observed between the ROM-BF and ROM-M9 treatments (p > 0.05).

3.3. Permeate Water Conductivity and pH Values after Reverse-Osmosis Processing Using ROMs from Different Cleaning Treatments

The results of permeate water conductivity (µS × cm−1) obtained after 15 h of the ROMs experiment and those previously cleaned with different treatments are shown in Table 4. The results showed that the highest conductivity of permeate water was obtained in the ROM-QTAl-SN treatment, followed, in decreasing order, with significant differences (p < 0.05), by ROM-BF, ROM-QT, ROM-SN-QTac, ROM-M9, ROM-SN, and finally ROM-CT. This tendency was observed in each hour sampled throughout the experiment. No significant differences were observed in pH values (p > 0.05) between ROM cleaning treatments. However, a decrease in pH was observed in the permeated water in all treatments compared with the pH observed in feed water (pre-osmosis), with an average value of 6.93 ± 0.04.

3.4. Supernatant from Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM Restored Qualitative Aspects in ROMs from the Desalination Plant

To observe how cleaning treatments modified the physical aspects of ROMs, the ROM surface was analyzed through atomic force microscopy (AFM). The results showed that ROM-CT (brand new membranes) samples had a rough texture, highlighting the presence of small regular peaks on their surface (Figure 2A). However, when ROMs were exposed to continuous work for 3.5 years, the presence of biofouling drastically modified the ROMs’ surface to a mostly “spongy” appearance (Figure 2B). Nevertheless, when membranes were submitted to a cleaning treatment, the control topography was partially recovered. A considerable level of recovery was observed in membranes treated with the Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant (ROM-SN), either as a single treatment (Figure 2E) or mixed with chemical components (Figure 2F). This result indicates that the Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant effects were maintained under operating conditions (high pressure and continuous flow).

4. Discussion

Researchers have long searched for novel economical and eco-friendly methodologies for cleaning ROMs, and diverse approaches have been evaluated in an attempt to achieve this goal. Several authors have proposed modifications in ROMs structures to improve their chemical and physical properties [28], as well as the application of different chemical or biological components as cleaning agents with less toxic effects [11,12]. In this context, the use of microorganisms that can degrade the biofouling EPS matrix has exhibited considerable promise [27,29,30]. However, several of these approaches have been evaluated only under laboratory conditions and on a small scale—conditions that, in many aspects, are not similar to those observed in the routine operation of desalination plants. These differences have been primarily noted in water flow rates, operation pressure, and the temperature to which ROMs are exposed during daily cleaning treatments at desalination plants. These factors cannot be underestimated because they affect the performance of these promising approaches that have been observed in the laboratory. In this study, we used the bacterial supernatant of the Alteromonas sp. Ni-LEM strain as a cleaning agent under real-life operating conditions according to the protocols used by a desalination plant in charge of supplying drinking water to the city of Antofagasta, Chile (Aguas Antofagasta S.A.).
The results showed that the Ni1-LEM supernatant exhibited considerable potential as a cleaning agent under real-life conditions. The data showed that the Ni1-LEM supernatant resulted in the best outcomes in relation to water permeability, the recovery of permeability (PR), and conductivity among all analyzed treatments, and it reached the closest values to the control conditions (ROM-CT).
The use of the Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant also resulted in improved permeate quality according to the conductivity values. Lower permeated water conductivity implies a higher retention of salts by ROMs [19,31,32], meaning that the ROM-CT membrane retained more salts from the feed water (feedwater conductivity: 52,850 µS × cm−1), resulting in permeate water with fewer salts compared with the other treatments. However, the permeated water conductivity from the ROM-CT treatment was used as a reference; thus, treatments with conductivity values near to those of ROM-CT showed better cleaning performance. In this context, the treatment using the bacterial supernatant (ROM-SN), which exhibited lower permeated water conductivity compared with other cleaning treatments, led to better performance when comparing the conditions.
Traditional chemical treatments, primarily those that use alkali solutions to increase cleaning efficiency, require an operating temperature from 35 °C to 38 °C, which is reflected in the increased costs associated with cleaning treatments due to energy use (Aguas Antofagasta SA). In contrast, although the Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant is a temperature-sensitive solution [25], this did not pose a problem because the best results observed with Alteromonas sp. supernatant on a laboratory scale (without pressure and water flux) were obtained at room temperature [27], a condition also observed in the present study compared with other treatments (Table 2 and Table 3). This could be reflected in a decrease in operating costs due to the application of the supernatant. Several authors have reported that traditional chemical treatments, in addition to eliminating biofouling, generate adverse effects on ROM structures, reducing their operation life [9,33,34]. The Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant only interacted with biofouling components, such as the formed EPS, and could thus be successfully used against a broad spectrum of microalgal biofilms without negatively affecting the ROM structures [26,27].
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides several tools with which to evaluate the physical and micromechanical properties of samples. This is achieved through the interaction of a cantilever probe with the surface to be studied [35]. Thus, AFM has previously been used in RO systems to evaluate physical changes on the surfaces of ROMs [36,37,38,39,40], with the performance of ROMs considerably depending on their physical–chemical properties, which decrease in the presence of biofouling. A previous study by [41] indicated that biofouling produces topographical differences in ROMs, demonstrating that this biological event has adverse effects on desalination systems and their permeate production processes. Our results showed that biofouling generated modifications on ROM surfaces exposed to continuous operation for 3.5 years (Figure 2B), as well as those undergoing periodic cleaning treatments that are carried out with greater intensity when HABs (harmful algae blooms) appear; for example, the bay of Antofagasta suffered from HABs events in 2019 and 2020, and these events are the cause of an increase in the cost production of potable water and a decrease in the average life of ROMs [42]—these modifications are reflected in a decrease in permeate volume (Table 2). However, when the Altermonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant was used as a cleaning treatment, a recovery in terms of the topography was observed (similar to the control samples: ROM-CT). This recovery was not observed when chemical treatments were used as cleaning methods. The topography observed in the ROM-SN treatment was also correlated with the results obtained regarding the comparison of permeate volumes, because the ROM-SN treatment (treatment with the Altermonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant) had the highest performance compared with the other chemical treatments. These data support the idea that the Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant can be applied in operating conditions as an eco-friendly alternative for ROM cleaning in the desalination industry.
One of the biggest bottlenecks preventing the industrial application of these new eco-friendly approaches, allowing them to compete with more traditional treatments, is the scaling of these processes for higher-volume production [29]. In this context, our group previously scaled and produced a massive 400 L culture of Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM to obtain and evaluate the production of a supernatant with antifouling effects. The data showed that this massive culture had a supernatant production yield with a concentration of 614 µg mL−1 of protein. As mentioned above, the application of the supernatant as an ROM-cleaning treatment at a concentration of 200 µg mL−1 of protein as a working solution indicated that the massive culture generated a 3× concentrate of the working solution.
Additionally, preliminary economic studies showed that the production cost of 1 L of working solution of supernatant (200 µg mL−1) has an approximate cost between USD 0.14 to 0.19, which would allow generating a business model for its large-scale production.

5. Conclusions

The results show that the Alteromonas sp. Ni-LEM supernatant is a promising substance with a high potential for industrial application because it can be applied under the conditions of pressure, water flow, and temperature normally used in seawater desalination plants. Future work will focus on the application of a semi-industrial-scale Ni1-LEM supernatant based on technological transference projects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.S.-A.; methodology, H.V.-V., C.R. and F.S.-A.; validation, H.V.-V. and F.S.-A.; formal analysis, H.V.-V., C.R. and F.S.-A.; investigation, H.V.-V., C.R. and F.S.-A.; supervision, C.R. and F.S.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, H.V.-V.; writing—review and editing, H.V.-V., C.R. and F.S.-A.; project administration, F.S.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fund for Promotion of Scientific and Technological Development of the National Research and Development Agency (FONDEF, ANID) under Grant No. ID14I20072 and Grant No. ID21I10044.

Institutional Review Board Statement

No applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by the Fund for Promotion of Scientific and Technological Development of the National Research and Development Agency (FONDEF, ANID) under Grant No. ID14I20072 and Grant No. ID21I10044. AFM microscope RAMAN-AFM acquired through Proyecto Fundación Andes C-13877 was kindly provided by Unidad de Equipamiento Científico MAINI, Universidad Católica del Norte (UCN).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wahl, M. Marine epibiosis, I. Fouling and antifouling: Some basic aspects. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1989, 58, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dobretsov, S.V.; Qian, P.Y. Effect of bacteria associated with the green alga Ulva reticulata on marine micro- and macrofouling. Biofouling 2002, 18, 217–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Christensen, B.E. The role of extracellular polysaccharides in biofilms. J. Biotechnol. 1989, 10, 181–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Flemming, H.C.; Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fitridge, I.; Dempster, T.; Guenther, J.; de Nys, R. The impact and control of biofouling in marine aquaculture: A review. Biofouling 2012, 28, 649–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Van der Hoek, J.P.; Hofman, J.A.; Bonné, P.A.C.; Nederlof, M.M.; Vrouwenvelder, H.S. RO treatment: Selection of a pretreatment scheme based on fouling characteristics and operating conditions based on environmental impact. Desalination 2000, 127, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maddah, H.; Chogle, A. Biofouling in reverse osmosis: Phenomena, monitoring, controlling and remediation. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 2637–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Flemming, H.C.; Ridgway, H. Biofilm Control: Conventional and Alternative Approaches. In Marine and Industrial Biofouling; Springer Series on Biofilms; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 4, pp. 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Al-Ahmad, M.; Abdul Aleem, F.A.; Mutiri, A.; Ubaisy, A. Biofouling in RO membrane systems Part 1: Fundamentals and control. Desalination 2000, 132, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goh, P.S.; Lau, W.J.; Othman, M.H.D.; Ismail, A.F. Membrane fouling in desalination and its mitigation strategies. Desalination 2018, 425, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nagaraj, N.; Skillman, L.; Xie, Z.; Jiang, S.; Ho, G.; Li, D. Investigation of compounds that degrade biofilm polysaccharides on reverse osmosis membranes from a full scale desalination plant to alleviate biofouling. Desalination 2017, 403, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nagaraj, V.; Skillman, L.; Li, D.; Foreman, A.; Xie, Z.; Ho, G. Characterization of extracellular polysaccharides from bacteria isolated from a full-scale desalination plant. Desalination 2017, 418, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tunkal, R.I.; Jamal, M.T.; Abdulrahman, I.; Pugazhendi, A.; Satheesh, S. Antifouling Activity of Bacterial Extracts Associated with Soft Coral and Macroalgae from the Red Sea. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. 2022, 51, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adnan, M.; Alshammari, E.; Patel, M.; Ashraf, S.A.; Khan, S.; Hadi, S. Significance and Potential of Marine Microbial Natural Bioactive Compounds against Biofilms/Biofouling: Necessity for Green Chemistry. PeerJ 2018, 6, e5049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, S.; Xu, B.; Ng, T.C.A.; He, M.; Shi, X.; Ng, H.Y. Feasibility of Implementing Quorum Quenching Technology to Mitigate Membrane Fouling in MBRs Treating Phenol-Rich Pharmaceutical Wastewater: Application of Rhodococcus Sp. BH4 and Quorum Quenching Consortium. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 358, 127389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mehmood, C.T.; Waheed, H.; Tan, W.; Xiao, Y. Photocatalytic Quorum Quenching: A New Antifouling and in-Situ Membrane Cleaning Strategy for an External Membrane Bioreactor Coupled to UASB. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alemán-Vega, M.; Sánchez-Lozano, I.; Hernández-Guerrero, C.J.; Hellio, C.; Quintana, E.T. Exploring Antifouling Activity of Biosurfactants Producing Marine Bacteria Isolated from Gulf of California. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdulrahman, I.; Jamal, M.T.; Pugazhendi, A.; Dhavamani, J.; Satheesh, S. Antibiofilm Activity of Secondary Metabolites from Bacterial Endophytes of Red Sea Soft Corals. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2022, 173, 105462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bachosz, K.; Vu, M.T.; Nghiem, L.D.; Zdarta, J.; Nguyen, L.N.; Jesionowski, T. Enzyme-Based Control of Membrane Biofouling for Water and Wastewater Purification: A Comprehensive Review. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 25, 102106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meshram, P.; Dave, R.; Joshi, H.; Dharani, G.; Kirubagaran, R.; Venugopalan, V.P. A Fence That Eats the Weed: Alginate Lyase Immobilization on Ultrafiltration Membrane for Fouling Mitigation and Flux Recovery. Chemosphere 2016, 165, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lahiri, D.; Nag, M.; Dey, A.; Sarkar, T.; Ray, R.R.; Rebezov, M.; Shariati, M.A.; Thiruvengadam, M.; Simal-Gandara, J. Immobilized Enzymes as Potent Antibiofilm Agent. Biotechnol. Prog. 2022, 38, e3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khani, M.; Hansen, M.F.; Knøchel, S.; Rasekh, B.; Ghasemipanah, K.; Zamir, S.M.; Nosrati, M.; Burmølle, M. Antifouling Potential of Enzymes Applied to Reverse Osmosis Membranes. SSRN Electron. J. 2022. in-press pre-proofs. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Köse-Mutlu, B.; Ergön-Can, T.; Koyuncu, I.; Lee, C.H. Quorum Quenching for Effective Control of Biofouling in Membrane Bioreactor: A Comprehensive Review of Approaches, Applications, and Challenges. Environ. Eng. Res. 2019, 24, 543–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zapata, M.; Silva, F.; Luza, Y.; Wilkens, M.; Riquelme, C. The inhibitory effect of biofilms produced by wild bacterial isolates to the larval settlement of the fouling ascidia Ciona intestinalis and Pyura praeputialis. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 10, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Silva-Aciares, F.; Riquelme, C. Inhibition of attachment of some fouling diatoms and settlement of Ulva lactuca zoospores by film-forming bacterium and their extracellular products isolated from biofouled substrata in northern Chile. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 11, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Infante, C.; Castillo, F.; Pérez, V.; Riquelme, C. Inhibition of Nitzschia ovalis biofilm settlement by a bacterial bioactive compound through alteration of EPS and epiphytic bacteria. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 33, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vera-Villalobos, H.; Pérez, V.; Contreras, F.; Alcayaga, V.; Avalos, V.; Riquelme, C.; Silva-Aciares, F. Characterization and removal of biofouling from reverse osmosis membranes (ROMs) from a desalination plant in Northern Chile, using Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant. Biofouling 2020, 36, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Asadollahi, M.; Bastani, D.; Musavi, S.A. Enhancement of surface properties and performance of reverse osmosis membranes after surface modification: A review. Desalination 2017, 420, 330–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Idais, R.H.; Abuhabib, A.A.; Hamzah, S. Recent Advances in Measuring and Controlling Biofouling of Seawater Reverse Osmosis SWRO: A Review. In Osmotically Driven Membrane Processes; Intechopen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maitreya, A.; Pal, S.; Qureshi, A.; Reyed, R.M.; Purohit, H.J. Nitric oxide–secreting probiotics as sustainable bio-cleaners for reverse osmosis membrane systems. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 4911–4929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Criscuoli, A.; Carnevale, M.C. Desalination by vacuum membrane distillation: The role of cleaning on the permeate conductivity. Desalination 2015, 365, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ruiz-García, A.; Ruiz-Saavedra, E. 80,000h operational experience and performance analysis of a brackish water reverse osmosis desalination plant. Assessment of membrane replacement cost. Desalination 2015, 375, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Du, J.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, R.; Zhang, P.; Cui, F. Effect of Vacuum Ultraviolet/Ozone Pretreatment on Alleviation of Ultrafiltration Membrane Fouling Caused by Algal Extracellular and Intracellular Organic Matter. Chemosphere 2022, 305, 135455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, X.Q.; Wu, X.; Huo, H.W.; Zhao, Q.B.; Zheng, Y.M.; Xie, Z. Designing Triple-Layer Superhydrophobic/Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic Nanofibrous Membrane via Electrohydrodynamic Technique for Enhanced Anti-Fouling and Anti-Wetting in Wastewater Treatment by Membrane Distillation. JMS Lett. 2022, 2, 100030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Efremov, Y.M.; Okajima, T.; Raman, A. Measuring viscoelasticity of soft biological samples using atomic force microscopy. Soft Matter 2019, 16, 64–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kwak, S.Y.; Jung, S.G.; Yoon, Y.S.; Ihm, D.W. Details of surface features in aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes characterized by scanning electron and atomic force microscopy. J. Polym. Sci. B. Polym. Phys. 1999, 37, 1429–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pang, C.M.; Hong, P.; Guo, H.; Liu, W.T. Biofilm formation characteristics of bacterial isolates retrieved from a reverse osmosis membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 7541–7550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chichirova, N.D.; Chichirov, A.A.; Saitov, S.R. Atomic force microscopy and IR spectrometry application in detecting the type and nature of contaminants on reverse osmosis membrane elements. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 288, No 1, 012007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, D.; Liu, T.; Kang, J.; Xu, R.; Cao, Y.; Xiang, M. Enhancing the Permeability and Antifouling Properties of Polyamide Composite Reverse Osmosis Membrane by Surface Modification with Zwitterionic Amino Acid L-Arginine. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Choi, S.J.; Kim, S.; Im, S.J.; Jang, A.; Hwang, D.S.; Kang, S. Ionic Fluid as a Novel Cleaning Agent for the Control of Irreversible Fouling in Reverse Osmosis Membrane Processes. Water Res. 2022, 224, 119063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Powell, L.C.; Hilal, N.; Wright, C.J. Atomic force microscopy study of the biofouling and mechanical properties of virgin and industrially fouled reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2017, 404, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Seubert, E.L.; Caron, D.A. Impact of Algal Blooms and Their Toxins on Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant Operations. In Sustainable Desalination Handbook: Plant Selection, Design and Implementation; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Membranes 13 00454 g001 550
Figure 1. Desalination system scheme. Overview scheme of the desalination system used by Aguas Antofagasta SA. Red arrows denote the water flux inside the RO system to obtain permeated water. Orange arrow indicates the first ROMs exposed to water in the reverse-osmosis system and ROMs used in all the bioassays.
Figure 1. Desalination system scheme. Overview scheme of the desalination system used by Aguas Antofagasta SA. Red arrows denote the water flux inside the RO system to obtain permeated water. Orange arrow indicates the first ROMs exposed to water in the reverse-osmosis system and ROMs used in all the bioassays.
Membranes 13 00454 g001
Membranes 13 00454 g002 550
Figure 2. ROMs AFM microscopy after cleaning processes. Imaging of ROMs surface obtained through AFM microscopy: (A) brand new membrane ROM-CT; (B) treated with M9 ROM-M9; (C) fouled-membrane ROM-BF; (D) chemical treatment ROM-QT; (E) Ni1-LEM treatment ROM-SN; and (F) Mix ROM QTal-SN. The results showed that Ni1-LEM treatment considerably restored qualitative aspects of ROMs.
Figure 2. ROMs AFM microscopy after cleaning processes. Imaging of ROMs surface obtained through AFM microscopy: (A) brand new membrane ROM-CT; (B) treated with M9 ROM-M9; (C) fouled-membrane ROM-BF; (D) chemical treatment ROM-QT; (E) Ni1-LEM treatment ROM-SN; and (F) Mix ROM QTal-SN. The results showed that Ni1-LEM treatment considerably restored qualitative aspects of ROMs.
Membranes 13 00454 g002
Table
Table 1. Description of ROMs treatments. All ROMs were model SWC6-LD Hydranautics, and fouled ROMs were obtained after 3.5 years of continuous operation. ROMs were subjected to a cleaning process described by Aguas Antofagasta S.A., modifying chemical mixes according to treatments. Additionally, Fouled ROMs (ROM-BF) and Unfouled ROMs (ROM-CT) without cleaning treatments were used as controls.
Table 1. Description of ROMs treatments. All ROMs were model SWC6-LD Hydranautics, and fouled ROMs were obtained after 3.5 years of continuous operation. ROMs were subjected to a cleaning process described by Aguas Antofagasta S.A., modifying chemical mixes according to treatments. Additionally, Fouled ROMs (ROM-BF) and Unfouled ROMs (ROM-CT) without cleaning treatments were used as controls.
Treatment Abbreviation1st Rinse Step
(58 psi -15 min)		Wash Step 1 (58 psi)
(R: 30 min I: 15 min) X4		2nd Rinse Step
(58 psi -15 min)		Wash Step 2 (58 psi)
(R: 30 min I: 15 min) X4		3rd Rinse Step
(58 psi -15 min)
ROM-M9 R: 0.1% EDTA pH 12 at 35 °CM9 media at RTR: permeate water at RTM9 media at RTR: permeate water at RT
ROM-QTR: 0.1% EDTA pH 12 at 35 °CSTPP 0.67 w/v, EDTA 0.6% w/v pH 12 at 35 °CR: permeate water at RT1% citric acid w/v at RTR: permeate water at RT
ROM-SNR: 0.1% EDTA pH 12 at 35 °CAlteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant at RTR: permeate water at RTAlteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant at RTR: permeate water at RT
ROM-QTAl-SNR: 0.1% EDTA pH 12 at 35 °CSTPP 0.67 w/v, EDTA 0.6% w/v pH 12 at 35 °CR: permeate water at RTAlteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant at RTR: permeate water at RT
ROM-SN-QTacR: 0.1% EDTA pH 12 at 35 °CAlteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant at RTR: permeate water at RT1% citric acid w/v at RTR: permeate water at RT
ROM-BFFouled reverse osmosis membrane without cleaning treatment
ROM-CTBrand new reverse osmosis membrane without cleaning treatment
R: Recirculation. I: Incubation. RT: Room Temperature.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of water permeability (Pi) from ROMs treated with different cleaning protocols. ROM-CT (Clean ROM); ROM-BF (Fouled ROM without treatment); ROM-M9 (M9 culture media); ROM-QT (Complete Chemical Treatment); ROM-SN-QTAc (Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant + acid chemical treatment); ROM-QTAl-SN (Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant + alkali chemical treatment); and ROM-SN (Only with Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant). Statistical differences (*) against ROM-BF are from four replicates and validated with one-way ANOVA LSD (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Comparison of water permeability (Pi) from ROMs treated with different cleaning protocols. ROM-CT (Clean ROM); ROM-BF (Fouled ROM without treatment); ROM-M9 (M9 culture media); ROM-QT (Complete Chemical Treatment); ROM-SN-QTAc (Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant + acid chemical treatment); ROM-QTAl-SN (Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant + alkali chemical treatment); and ROM-SN (Only with Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant). Statistical differences (*) against ROM-BF are from four replicates and validated with one-way ANOVA LSD (p < 0.05).
TreatmentsAverage Pi
(L·m−2·h−1·bar−1)		ED
ROM-CT0.5272 *±0.0016
ROM-SN0.3747 *±0.0026
ROM-SN-QTac0.3642 *±0.0014
ROM-QT0.3625 *±0.0044
ROM-QTAl-SN0.3620 *±0.0017
ROM-M90.2765±0.0046
ROM-BF0.2733±0.0051
Table
Table 3. ROM permeability recovery (PR) of ROMs after treatments with different cleaning protocols. ROM-CT (Clean ROM); ROM-BF (Fouled ROM without treatment); ROM-M9 (M9 culture media); ROM-QT (Complete Chemical Treatment); ROM-SN-QTAc (Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant + acid chemical treatment); ROM-QTAl-SN (Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant + alkali chemical treatment); and ROM-SN (Only with Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant). Results showed that highest PR was reached by ROMs treated with Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant. Statistical differences (*) against ROM-BF are from four replicates and validated with one-way ANOVA LSD (p < 0.05).
Table 3. ROM permeability recovery (PR) of ROMs after treatments with different cleaning protocols. ROM-CT (Clean ROM); ROM-BF (Fouled ROM without treatment); ROM-M9 (M9 culture media); ROM-QT (Complete Chemical Treatment); ROM-SN-QTAc (Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant + acid chemical treatment); ROM-QTAl-SN (Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant + alkali chemical treatment); and ROM-SN (Only with Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant). Results showed that highest PR was reached by ROMs treated with Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant. Statistical differences (*) against ROM-BF are from four replicates and validated with one-way ANOVA LSD (p < 0.05).
TreatmentsWater Permeability
Recovery (PR)		ED
ROM-CT1.0 *0
ROM-SN0.7205 *±0.0038
ROM-SN-QTAc0.6926 *±0.0046
ROM-QT0.6873 *±0.0064
ROM-QTAl-SN0.6866 *±0.0039
ROM-M90.5390±0.0048
ROM-BF0.5310±0.0081
Table
Table 4. Permeate conductivity (µS·cm−1) after ROMs treatments with different cleaning protocols. ROM-CT, ROM-BF, ROM-M9, ROM-QT, ROM-SN-QTAc, ROM-QTAl-SN, and ROM-SN. The 15-h results showed that lower conductivity was achieved by ROMs treated with Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant. Statistical differences (*) against ROM-BF are from four replicates and validated with one-way ANOVA LSD (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Permeate conductivity (µS·cm−1) after ROMs treatments with different cleaning protocols. ROM-CT, ROM-BF, ROM-M9, ROM-QT, ROM-SN-QTAc, ROM-QTAl-SN, and ROM-SN. The 15-h results showed that lower conductivity was achieved by ROMs treated with Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM supernatant. Statistical differences (*) against ROM-BF are from four replicates and validated with one-way ANOVA LSD (p < 0.05).
TreatmentsAverage Conductivity
(µS·cm−1)		ED
ROM-CT434.77 *±4.64
ROM-SN469.517 *±4.26
ROM-M9479.717 *±3.34
ROM-SN-QTAc487.893 *±2.06
ROM-QT490.675 *±2.21
ROM-BF511.25±1.49
ROM-QTAl-SN528.253 *±4.14
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vera-Villalobos, H.; Riquelme, C.; Silva-Aciares, F. Use of Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM Supernatant as a Cleaning Agent for Reverse-Osmosis Membranes (ROMs) from a Desalination Plant in Northern Chile Affected by Biofouling. Membranes 2023, 13, 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13050454

AMA Style

Vera-Villalobos H, Riquelme C, Silva-Aciares F. Use of Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM Supernatant as a Cleaning Agent for Reverse-Osmosis Membranes (ROMs) from a Desalination Plant in Northern Chile Affected by Biofouling. Membranes. 2023; 13(5):454. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13050454

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vera-Villalobos, Hernán, Carlos Riquelme, and Fernando Silva-Aciares. 2023. "Use of Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM Supernatant as a Cleaning Agent for Reverse-Osmosis Membranes (ROMs) from a Desalination Plant in Northern Chile Affected by Biofouling" Membranes 13, no. 5: 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13050454

APA Style

Vera-Villalobos, H., Riquelme, C., & Silva-Aciares, F. (2023). Use of Alteromonas sp. Ni1-LEM Supernatant as a Cleaning Agent for Reverse-Osmosis Membranes (ROMs) from a Desalination Plant in Northern Chile Affected by Biofouling. Membranes, 13(5), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13050454

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop