1. Introduction
Bovine babesiosis is one of the most important tick-borne diseases of cattle worldwide. In Mexico, the disease has been reported since 1905, as the country’s environment provides favorable conditions for the survival of the tick that transmits it. In Latin America, this disease is transmitted by the cattle fever ticks
Rhipicephalus microplus and
R. annulatus [
1,
2]. The estimated annual economic losses caused by the cattle fever tick and the diseases they transmit, such as babesiosis and anaplasmosis, are between USD 13.9 billion and USD 18.7 billion [
3]. Developing effective and sustainable methods to control this disease should be an important goal for research in countries where bovine babesiosis is endemic. Since the late 20th century, efforts have been made to develop an effective vaccine against bovine babesiosis. This has led to the creation of vaccines using attenuated live parasites, which have proven very effective. However, their use comes with several drawbacks, including the risk of reversion to virulence, high production costs, and potential contamination with other pathogens, among others [
2,
4].
Although there are no commercial vaccines without these disadvantages, to develop them it is necessary to deepen the understanding of the antigens and the mechanisms involved in the life cycle of pathogens that cause bovine babesiosis, both in the vector that transmits them, and in the mammalian host. Thus, the use of several tools is required, such as immunobioinformatics and reverse vaccinomics, among others, which have advanced significantly in recent years and make it possible to in silico identify genes that encode proteins capable of inducing antibody production to neutralize
B. bovis invasion of its target cells [
5,
6].
Enolase is a glycolytic enzyme classified as a “moonlight” protein because it has been found to perform functions beyond its role in glycolysis. On the surface of certain pathogens, including
Plasmodium, enolase facilitates host-cell invasion by binding to plasminogen; this interaction between enolase and plasminogen leads the formation of active plasmin which degrades extracellular matrix surrounding the target cell, facilitating pathogen entry [
7,
8]. It is considered a vaccine candidate for different diseases, including those caused by Apicomplexan organisms such as
Babesia microti and
Plasmodium falciparum, as it induces a protective immune response in mice immunized with recombinant enolase [
7,
8,
9]. To date, enolase has not been characterized in
B. bovis. This study aimed to identify the enolase gene in the
B. bovis genome and to determine its expression in parasite erythrocytic stages, as well as to determine if the enolase protein contained conserved B-cell epitopes that neutralize parasite invasion in the bovine erythrocytes.
2. Materials and Methods
This project was evaluated and approved by the Natural Science Faculty Bioethical Committee from the Autonomous University of Queretaro (approval 14FCN2019).
2.1. Identification and In Silico Analysis of the B. bovis Enolase Gene
Using the
enolase gene sequences of
Babesia bigemina (NCBI accession code: MK490919.1) and
P. falciparum (NCBI accession code: XM_004221995.1) as reference, we searched for similar sequences in the
B. bovis strain T2Bo genomic sequence (NCBI accession code: AAXT00000000.2) within the GenBank database (
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank, (accessed on July 2019) through a BLAST (version 2.10.0) analysis. For the matched sequences, we performed the following analyses: (1) prediction of open reading frames, which was carried out with the ORFfinder tool (
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder, accessed on July 2019). (2) Prediction of introns and exons, which was performed using the GENSCAN tool (
http://hollywood.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html, accessed on July 2019).
2.2. B. bovis DNA Extraction from Field Isolates
The
B. bovis isolates used in this project come from
R. microplus ticks collected from cattle in three different and geographically distant states in Mexico: Nayarit, Michoacan, and Puebla. The ticks were processed at the Immunology and Vaccines Laboratory of the Autonomous University of Queretaro. Each tick was incubated individually for oviposition and then examined for
Babesia spp. infection. The infection was detected by microscopically analyzing the hemolymph for the presence of kinetes [
10]. DNA was extracted from kinete-positive ticks with the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), following the protocol specified by the manufacturer. A nested PCR analysis was performed to identify those ticks infected with
B. bovis using the oligonucleotides described previously [
11] and MyTaq
TM Mix (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany). The PCR thermal conditions for the first reaction were 95 °C for 3 min as initial denaturation, followed by 30 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 52 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension step of 72 °C for 7 min. A measurement of 1 µL of this reaction were used as a DNA template for the nested reaction. The thermal conditions for this second reaction were 95 °C for 3 min as initial denaturation, followed by 30 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension step of 72 °C for 7 min. Positive DNA was preserved at −20 °C until use.
2.3. B.bovis RNA and Antigen Extraction
RNA and protein from
B. bovis were obtained from the blood of an experimentally infected Holstein steer. An 8-month-old steer, sourced from a tick-free zone, was infested with approximately 10,000 larvae derived from
B. bovis-infected female ticks of the Puebla state isolate. The blood of the infected steer was processed following the methodology described by Vega and others [
12] to establish an in vitro culture to obtain only infected erythrocytes for slides and protein extraction. These erythrocytes were used for RNA extraction with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using the protocol specified by the manufacturer. Additionally, infected erythrocytes were separated and used for protein extraction following the methodology described previously [
13]. Blood smears were prepared as antigen for the indirect immunofluorescence test, following the indications of the WOAH manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals [
14]. This material was preserved at −20 °C until use.
2.4. Amplification and Sequencing of Enolase Gene
Two oligonucleotides were designed to amplify the full length of the enolase gene (Fw: 5′-CACTTGTCCGCTCAGTCACTC-3′, Rv: 5′-CCCTGCGATACTGGAGTTTTG-3′) and were used in PCR assays with Nayarit and Michoacan DNA strains, using MyTaqTM Mix (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany). The thermocycling conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 53 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR product was visualized in 1% agarose gel with fluorescent GelRedTM Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (GOLDBIO, St. Louis, MO, USA) and identified with the molecular size marker HyperLadderTM 1 Kb (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany).
The amplicon obtained was purified using the EZ-10 Spin Column DNA gel Extraction MiniPrep kit (Bio Basic Inc., Markham, ON, Canada). The purified amplicons were cloned into the TOPO
TM TA Cloning
TM with pCR
TM2.1-TOPO
TM One Shot TOP10 Chemically Competent
E. coliTM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer instructions. The plasmidic DNA from selected clones (one from Nayarit strain and two from Michoacan strain) were purified using Illustra
TM plasmidPrep Mini Spin Kit (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) and sent for sequencing to Instituto de Biotecnologia at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico) using the oligonucleotides designed to this purpose: 5′-CATGCTCCCAGTTCCATGC-3′ and 5′-GGTGTATGCTTCCCAGTCATCC-3′, and the general oligonucleotides “M13/pUC Reverse” and “T7 primer”. The obtained electropherograms were analyzed with the help of the NUCLEICS BioEdit program (
https://www.nucleics.com) and were assembled to obtain the sequences corresponding to the
B. bovis enolase gene from Nayarit and Michoacan isolates.
2.5. Transcription Analysis by RT-PCR
To evaluate the enolase gene transcription in erythrocytic phases, an RT-PCR assay was performed using the Super Script® III Firts-Strand kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s specifications and RNA from B. bovis Puebla state isolate. The cDNA obtained from the reverse transcription was used in a 12.5 µL PCR reaction composed as follows: 6.25 µL of MyTaqTM Mix (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany), 5 µL of each of the oligonucleotides that amplify the internal part of the gene (Fw: 5′-CATGCTCCCAGTTCCATGC-3′ and Rv:5′-GGTGTATGCTTCCCAGTCATCC-3′) at 10 pmol/µL, 3.25 µL of molecular biology grade water, and 2 µL of cDNA. Molecular biology grade water instead of DNA or cDNA were used as a reaction negative control. B. bovis DNA was used as positive control and Dnase-traeated RNA from RT-PCR reaction in absence of Retro transcriptase was used as control for DNA contamination. The thermocycling program corresponds to the characteristics of the oligos used. The reaction product was visualized on a 1% agarose gel with GelRedTM (GOLDBIO, St. Louis, MO, USA) and the molecular size marker HyperladderTM 100 BP (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany) was used as a reference.
2.6. Enolase Protein In Silico Analysis and B-Cell Epitopes Prediction
The
enolase nucleotide sequences were obtained from isolates in the Mexican states of Nayarit and Michoacan. The predicted sequence from T2Bo strain were analyzed with the following bioinformatics tools: (1) GENESCAN (
http://hollywood.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html, accessed on July 2019) was used for identification of introns and exons; (2) ORF Finder (
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder, accessed on July 2019) was used for open reading frame identification and to obtain predicted amino acid sequences; (3) SignalP (
http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP, accessed on July 2019) was used for signal peptide identification in the amino acid sequence; (4) TMHMM (
http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/, accessed on July 2019) was used for the identification of transmembrane regions; (5) SMART (
http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de, accessed on July 2019) was used for protein domain identification; and (6) PROSITE (
https://prosite.expasy.org) allowed us to identify functional sites. The isoelectric point and molecular weight were predicted with the help of the ComputepI/Mw tool of ExPASy (
https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/, accessed on July 2019). Additionally, the amino acid sequences obtained were compared with the
B. bigemina enolase (QEG79394.1) and the sequence obtained from the genomic T2Bo sequence by making alignments with Clustal W (
https://www.genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw, accessed on July 2019). The percentage of identity between them was determined with the Clustal omega tool (
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/jdispatcher/msa/clustalo, accessed on July 2019). To search for peptides with B-cell epitopes, the following bioinformatics tools were used: ABCpred (
http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/abcpred, accessed on July 2019), BCEpred (
http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/bcepred, accessed on July 2019), BepiPred (
http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/BepiPred, accessed on July 2019) and IEDB (
https://www.iedb.org). Two selected peptides were commercially synthesized in an 8-branches peptide system (MAPS-8) by Peptide 2.0 Inc. (Chantilly, VA, USA).
2.7. Generation and Titration of Anti-Enolase Antibodies
To determine the immunogenicity of the selected peptides, 8-week-old rabbits were used, which were maintained and handled in the facilities of the Autonomous University of Querétaro. Each synthetic peptide was solubilized with PBS pH 7.4 and emulsified in Montanide ISA 71 VG adjuvant (Seppic, Paris, France) at a concentration of 100 μg/mL. Two rabbits were immunized with each peptide, rabbits “5” and “16” were immunized with the peptide ENOL-1 and rabbits “9” and “15” were immunized with the peptide ENOL-2. Rabbit “2” was immunized with adjuvant as a control. Five immunizations were performed subcutaneously in the scapular region. Immunizations were repeated 5 times, with intervals of 21 days between each immunization. Blood samples in anticoagulant-free tubes were obtained from the auricular vein before each immunization. Fifteen days after the last immunization the final bleeding was obtained. The serum was separated by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 5 min on a Science Med clinic centrifuge (Helsinki, Finland), and aliquoted into 1 mL volumes and stored at −20 °C until use. To evaluate the antibody titters on sera, an indirect-ELISA was performed using 96-well Polystyrene High Bind Microplates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) coated with 2 µg/mL of each peptide (100 µL each well) as described previously [
13]. After overnight incubation at 4 °C the plates were blocked using 200 µL PBS with 5% skim milk (
w/
v). Pre-immunization sera and the final sera were tested in triplicates of serial double dilutions starting at 1:500 and ending at 1:1,024,000. Sera were incubated for 1 h, at 37 °C. Then 100 µL peroxidase-bound, goat anti-rabbit Ig (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) was added and incubated for 1 h, at 37 °C, 200 rpm. The reaction was detected using 100 µL of substrate solution containing O-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride and hydrogen peroxide suspended in sodium citrate citric acid 0.1 M. The plates were read in an ELISA reader with an O.D at 450 nm. The average O.D. values of the pre- and post-immunization triplicates were analyzed with a
t-test (
p < 0.05).
2.8. Evaluation of B. bovis Enolase Expression
To evaluate the expression of
B. bovis enolase, confocal microscopy and Western blot assays were performed following the methodology described previously [
15]. For immunofluorescence, fresh antigen obtained from an established culture of
B. bovis fixed on slides with acetone–methanol (90–10%) was used. The slides were blocked with 5% goat serum in PBS-Tween 0.2% and then were incubated with the rabbit anti-enolase sera at a dilution of 1:150 in PBS and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C on a humidity chamber, then were washed 3 times with 0.1% PBS-T for 5 min. After washing, the slides were allowed to dry at room temperature. A second incubation was performed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody coupled with Alexa-488 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) diluted 1:200 in PBS-T containing Hoechst 33,342 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by ten washes with PBS-T. Slides were analyzed in a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope) using specific lasers for Alexa-488, Hoechst 33,342 and brightfield. Images were processed and merged with the LAS Advanced Fluorescence software (version 2.7.3.9723) (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).
For Western blot, 133 µg of B. bovis (Puebla state isolate) infected erythrocytes protein extracts and 5 µL molecular weight marker Opti-Protein Ultra Marker-G623 (Applied Biological Materials Inc., Richmond, BC, Canada) were separated on a 12% SDS-Poliacrylamide gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was blocked overnight at 4 °C and 200 rpm with 5% skim milk on TBS and cut into 0.5 cm strips. The strips were incubated individually for 1 h at 4 °C and 200 rpm with the specific antibodies at a concentration of 1:10,000, then the membrane trips were washed 3 times with TBS-T 0.05% for 5 min at 200 rpm and blocked overnight. After the second blocking step, the strips were incubated for 1 h in the same conditions with 1:15,000 anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) HRP conjugated antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) diluted in 0.05% TBS-T with 2% skim milk and washed 3 times. The strips were developed with the ECLTM Western blotting Detection Reagents kit (Cytiva®, Marlborough, MA, USA) on ChemiDoc Imaging System (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA).
2.9. Neutralization Assay
To determine if the anti-Enolase antibodies block the invasion of merozoites into erythrocytes, a neutralization assay was carried out using an in vitro culture of
B. bovis as described previously [
15]. In vitro culture of
B. bovis T3Bo strain (provided by the ADRU-USDA laboratory at Washington State University) was maintained in 48-well plates, at 5% hematocrit in PL media (100 mL = pH 7.2; 29 mL F-12K Nutrient Mixture + L-glutamine Life Technologies, 29 mL Stable Cell IMDM Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), 2 mL 0.5 M TAPSO Sigma Aldrich, 0.5 mL Antibiotic Antimycotic solution 100× Sigma Aldrich, 1 mM calcium chloride Sigma Aldrich, 100 μL Antioxidant Supplement 1000× Sigma Aldrich, 1 mL Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium-Ethanolamine 100× Sigma Aldrich, 1 mL 50% Glucose Teknova, 500 μL L-glutamine 200 mM GIBCO) supplemented with 40% normal bovine serum [
16], initially inoculated with 1% parasitemia, keeping it in an incubator at 37 °C at 5% CO
2. Daily, 75% of the medium was replaced with fresh medium and parasitemia was counted. Every 2 days a subculture was performed to adjust the culture again to 1% parasitemia. The assay was performed in triplicate in a 96-well plate with a final volume of 200 µL per well under the abovementioned conditions, adding 1:10 of the serum from each rabbit. All antisera used in this experiment were decomplemented before use by heating at 56 °C for 30 min. After 72 h of incubation, each well was re-homogenized by pipetting and individual samples were taken for smears, stained with Giemsa, and ~2000 cells from each well were counted to obtain the percentage of parasitized erythrocytes (PEP). As a statistical analysis, T tests for independent samples were performed, where
p values < 0.05 were considered significant.
4. Discussion
Bovine babesiosis stands out as one of the economically impactful tick-transmitted diseases in the livestock industry. The disease caused by B. bovis is of particular concern due to its high mortality rate. Currently, there are no recombinant vaccines available for this disease. Enolase, a moonlight protein present in various pathogens, has been considered a potential vaccine candidate. Although it is known to be present in other Babesia species, its experimental confirmation in B. bovis was lacking. Thus, the initial objectives of this project were to demonstrate the gene’s presence, assess its transcription and to determine if this antigen contained conserved B-cell epitopes that were immunogenic and finally, to test the ability of specific antibodies to block merozoite invasion in vitro.
Gene sequencing in two distinct
B. bovis isolates, followed by bioinformatic analysis, revealed a 1366 bp enolase gene located on chromosome 3. The gene contains an intron, starting at position 40 and ending at position 94. This gene encodes a 422 amino acid protein with an approximate weight of 47.73 kDa. Unlike the findings by Liu and others [
9]
B. microti enolase is reported as a 1317 bp gene, coding for a 438 amino acid, 47.5 kDa soluble protein with no signal peptide or transmembrane regions, our results align with their general observations. Enolase, vital for glucose-dependent energy metabolism in various organisms, has been observed not only in the cytoplasm but also on the surface of eukaryotic cells, acting as a strong plasminogen-binding receptor [
17,
18]. The mechanism of enolase translocation to the cell surface remains unclear, lacking a signal peptide for membrane targeting, but its surface expression is crucial for fibrinolysis and intracellular invasion by various pathogens [
17,
19].
Comparative analyses indicated significant similarities between
B. bovis enolase and that of another apicomplexan organism,
P. falciparum, with a 1342 bp gene coding for a 446 amino acid and 48.7 kDa protein [
9,
20]. Despite
B. bovis enolase having a slightly larger gene than its homologs in
P. falciparum and
B. microti, the encoded protein has fewer amino acids, possibly due to the differences in an intron in their
enolase genes, as predicted by previous studies. Sequence alignments revealed high identity (98.64% and 99.77%) between the predicted enolase protein of the T2Bo strain and isolates from Nayarit and Michoacán, respectively. Additionally, the predicted enolase protein of
B. bigemina showed identity percentages of 87.78% and 88.24% with those of
B. bovis isolates from Nayarit and Michoacán, respectively.
The expression of enolase protein in
B. bovis merozoites was assessed through confocal microscopy and WB. Specific antibodies against peptides ENOL-1 and ENOL-2, designed based on predicted antigenic regions containing predicted B-cell epitopes, successfully identified
B. bovis in its intraerythrocytic stages. These results are comparable with those obtained by immunizing individuals with peptides from different proteins such as TRAP, RON-2 and AMA-1 of
B. bovis and MIC-1 of
B. bigemina, where similar labeling patterns were observed [
13,
21,
22]. However, more detailed experiments are considered necessary to better determine the subcellular localization of enolase and whether it can be found on the surface of infected erythrocytes. However, verifying whether this occurs in natural infections would be difficult because erythrocytes infected with
B. bovis tend to be sequestered in capillaries of important organs. Previous investigations also assessed synthetic peptide capacity to generate antibodies that neutralize
Babesia invasion of erythrocytes, suggesting that peptides identified in this study may have the potential to inhibit
B. bovis invasion, given similar strategies in their selection [
13,
15,
22]. However, of the two peptides selected with the same strategy, and despite both being immunogenic, only one generated neutralizing antibodies. This may be due to different causes, among them we can hypothesize that the region in which the peptide is located is hidden in the native protein, which makes access to specific antibodies difficult, and another theory may be that the region from which the peptide was selected, although immunogenic, is not crucial for the function of the protein, so the antibodies generated would not represent an alteration in its function [
23]. The fact that anti-enolase antibodies are not able to completely block the parasite’s ability to invade erythrocytes was expected, since other studies have observed that, despite completely blocking the activity of an antigen, by knocking out the gene that encodes it, the parasite manages to invade its target cell, suggesting that pathogens have more than one way to achieve invasion [
24]. Additionally, we highlight the need to verify, in future experiments, the role that anti-enolase antibodies play in affecting infection in ticks fed on cattle immunized with this antigen.