Next Article in Journal
Defects in Glutathione System in an Animal Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Responses of Antioxidant Enzymes and Lignin Metabolism in Susceptible and Resistant Sweetpotato Cultivars during Root-Knot Nematode Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Peroxiredoxin 2: An Important Element of the Antioxidant Defense of the Erythrocyte
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adventitious Root Formation in Plants: The Implication of Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitric Oxide
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/antiox12051013
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Class III Peroxidases (POD) in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): Genome-Wide Identification and Regulation during Nitric Oxide (NO)-Influenced Fruit Ripening

by
Salvador González-Gordo
,
María A. Muñoz-Vargas
,
José M. Palma
and
Francisco J. Corpas
*
Group of Antioxidants, Free Radicals and Nitric Oxide in Biotechnology, Food and Agriculture, Department of Stress, Development and Signaling in Plants, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), C/Profesor Albareda 1, 18008 Granada, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(5), 1013; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051013
Submission received: 23 March 2023 / Revised: 18 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The class III peroxidases (PODs) catalyze the oxidation of several substrates coupled to the reduction of H2O2 to water, and play important roles in diverse plant processes. The POD family members have been well-studied in several plant species, but little information is available on sweet pepper fruit physiology. Based on the existing pepper genome, a total of 75 CaPOD genes have been identified, but only 10 genes were found in the fruit transcriptome (RNA-Seq). The time-course expression analysis of these genes showed that two were upregulated during fruit ripening, seven were downregulated, and one gene was unaffected. Furthermore, nitric oxide (NO) treatment triggered the upregulation of two CaPOD genes whereas the others were unaffected. Non-denaturing PAGE and in-gel activity staining allowed identifying four CaPOD isozymes (CaPOD I-CaPOD IV) which were differentially modulated during ripening and by NO. In vitro analyses of green fruit samples with peroxynitrite, NO donors, and reducing agents triggered about 100% inhibition of CaPOD IV. These data support the modulation of POD at gene and activity levels, which is in agreement with the nitro-oxidative metabolism of pepper fruit during ripening, and suggest that POD IV is a target for nitration and reducing events that lead to its inhibition.

1. Introduction

Peroxidases (PODs) constitute a heterogeneous group of enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of a large variety of substrates using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as an oxidizing agent. Being widely distributed in all living organisms, PODs can be classified according to their structural and catalytic properties into different families [1]. Among them, class III peroxidases (EC 1.11.1.7) are enzymes exclusive to the plant kingdom. In higher plants, a huge diversity of POD isozymes encoded by a multigene family has been reported [2,3,4]. Although the abbreviation used in the literature varies as POD or PRX, in this study we have used POD to avoid possible confusion with another group of peroxidases, namely peroxiredoxins (Prx; EC 1.11.1.15), which will not be included in present analyses.
The number of class III POD-encoding genes varies according to the species, ranging from 47 in grape (Vitis vinifera) [5], 73 in Arabidopsis thaliana [6], 82 in sugarcane (Saccharum spontaneum) [7], 102 in potato (Solanum tuberosum) [8], and 124 POD genes in soybean (Glycine max L.) [9] to 138 POD genes in rice (Oryza sativa) [10], or even, more than 200 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) [11]. Considering their participation in lignification and suberization processes as well as their induction in response to pathogen attacks, POD functions were mainly associated with plant defense mechanisms. However, different studies have suggested that POD enzymes are involved in a wide range of physiological processes [12], including seed germination [13], pollen development [14], pollination [15], phytohormone metabolism [16] and fruit ripening [17,18,19], as well as in the mechanism of abiotic stresses [9,20,21]. Furthermore, POD activity is considered an enzymatic indicator of quality deterioration in fruits since it is associated with bad taste [22,23,24].
Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is the most widespread and cultivated species of the Capsicum genus, belonging to the Solanaceae family. Besides its agronomic importance, pepper fruit is gaining great relevance as a nutraceutical product due to its high content of antioxidants, mainly vitamins A and C, and other compounds [25,26,27]. Additionally, some pepper varieties contain a group of specific alkaloids, known as capsaicinoids, with capsaicin being the most abundant one. These molecules, which are responsible for the pungency of hot peppers, have beneficial effects on human health [28,29,30]. One of the most relevant aspects of fruit physiology is the ripening process. Once the sweet pepper fruit has reached its final developmental size, which could take around two weeks, it begins its ripening phase from green to fully red ripe within the next 3 to 7 days. Commercial ripening starts when a very small part of the fruit shifts from green to a brownish/reddish color that is progressing to entirely red at the final stage. A characteristic of green peppers, as climacteric fruits, is that they cannot ripen off the plant, unless ripening has started while they are on the plant. In any case, sweet pepper fruits are edible at any stage of ripening, depending on the culinary practices in use. The metabolic alterations that take place during fruit development, combined with postharvest management, can determine the quality and nutritional properties of the fruit. Previous studies have shown that numerous changes in nitro-oxidative metabolism occur during pepper fruit ripening, where molecules such as reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS, respectively) play key roles [31,32]. In this context, nitric oxide (NO) seems to be a master regulator in this physiological process at different levels. On the one hand, it has been observed that the external application of NO gas caused a delay in ripening associated with an increase in the antioxidant capacity of the fruit [33,34,35]. Furthermore, NO can endogenously modulate the activity of certain enzymes through post-translational modifications (PTMs) such as nitration and S-nitrosation. In previous studies, we have analyzed some components involved in the metabolism of ROS and RNS including catalase [36], superoxide dismutase [37], ascorbate peroxidase [38], superoxide (O2•−)-generation by an NADPH oxidase [39], lipoxygenase [40], nitrosoglutathione reductase [41], as well as different NADPH-generating enzymes [42,43,44] and small heat shock proteins [45]. However, to our knowledge, there has not been any research study focused on the family of type III peroxidases (PODs) in sweet pepper fruits.
Therefore, this study aims to identify and characterize the genes that code for PODs in pepper fruits, and to analyze their expression during ripening and as result of the exogenous application of NO gas. The obtained data indicate the presence of 10 CaPOD genes in fruit that are differentially regulated. Likewise, the zymogram of POD activity shows the presence of four isozymes (CaPOD I–CaPOD IV), and in vitro assays demonstrated that the CaPOD IV was significantly regulated by RNS (nitration and S-nitrosation) and reducing agents such as glutathione and L-cysteine.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of POD Genes in Pepper, Chromosomal Location and Synteny Analysis

To identify the different peroxidase Class III-encoding genes in pepper (C. annuum L.), we carried out two different approaches. On the one hand, pepper proteome was downloaded from the NCBI database (Assembly UCD10Xv1.1; BioProject PRJNA814299; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/814299, accessed on 10 February 2023). The amino acid sequences from the PODs described in the model plant Arabidopsis were downloaded from the UnirProtKB database (https://www.uniprot.org/help/uniprotkb, accessed on 10 February 2023). These sequences were used as queries to search for PODs in the complete pepper proteome using the BLASTP v2.2.30 tool. On the other hand, we used the HMMER v3.3.2 software [46] to search for proteins that conserved the peroxidase domain in their sequence (PF00141), which was previously downloaded from the Pfam database [47]. Finally, redundant proteins, proteins identified as ascorbate peroxidases (APXs), and proteins whose length was out of the range of 300–400 amino acids were manually checked and discarded.
Location coordinates of the identified CaPOD genes in the pepper genome were obtained from the NCBI database. The co-localization analysis of the different CaPODs among the pepper chromosomes was performed using the toolkit MCScanX v1.0.0 [48]. This information was plotted in a genomic map elaborated with the software TBtools v1.108 [49] using the ‘Advanced Circos’ function.

2.2. Phylogenetic and Conserved Motif Analyses of POD Protein Sequences

The identified POD protein sequences in pepper and Arabidopsis were used to construct a phylogenetic tree. The alignment of PODs was performed using the CLUSTALW method [50]. Then, the aligned sequences were subjected to MEGA11 v0.13 [51] to perform an unrooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree with default parameters. Finally, the resulting phylogenetic tree was modified using the online tool Evolview v3 [52]. Conserved motifs of CaPODs were sought using the MEME tool [53] and visualized using TBtools software v1.108 [49]. The protein localization based on their amino acid sequences was predicted using WoLF PSORT (https://wolfpsort.hgc.jp/, accessed on 10 February 2023) [54].

2.3. Analysis of the CaPODs Cis-Regulatory Elements

The promoter sequences of the CaPODs were obtained from the NCBI Nucleotide database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/; accessed on 10 February 2023) considering 1500 bp upstream from the transcription starting point of each gene. These sequences were searched for possible cis-acting regulatory elements using the PantCARE tool (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 10 February 2023) [55]. These results were manually processed and visualized using the ‘Basic Biosequence View’ function of the TBtools v1.108 software [49].

2.4. Plant Material and Exogenous Nitric Oxide (NO) Gas Treatment

Sweet pepper (C. annuum L. cultivar Melchor) fruits belonging to the California type were assayed. For several years, fruits were harvested between January and February from plants grown in plastic-covered greenhouses (Zeraim Iberica/Syngenta Seeds, Ltd., Roquetas de Mar/El Ejido, Almería, Spain). Pepper plants were cultivated according to the usual crop program designed by the company: planting and seed germination start in July–August, flowering starts in late September, and pollination and fruit setting take place from middle October to late November. Fruits were harvested from late January to early February. The external average daily temperature, including values from fruit setting (about October 15th) until fruit harvesting (15 January–15 February), was 14.9 ± 0.3 °C. Data were obtained from the Meteorological Station of La Mojonera, Almería, Spain (latitude 36°47′14″ N, longitude 02°42′15″ W), located near the experimental greenhouse where fruits were grown and harvested.
Fruits from the same plant and without any external apparent injury were selected at three developmental stages: green immature (G), breaking point (BP1), and red ripe (R). Once harvested, the fruits were placed into black plastic bags and taken to the laboratory at room temperature, washed with distilled water, and maintained for 24 h at a low temperature (about 7 °C ± 1 °C). For the analysis of the exogenous NO gas treatment, we set two additional groups: fruits treated with 5 ppm NO for 1 h (BP2 + NO), and fruits that were not treated with NO (BP2 − NO). After 3 days at room temperature, all fruits were chopped into small cubes (5 mm/edge), frozen under liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until use. Figure 1 shows the experimental design followed in this study with the representative phenotypes of sweet pepper fruits at different ripening stages and subjected to NO treatment [35].

2.5. Library Preparation and RNA-Sequencing

All procedures were performed as previously described in [35] with minor modifications. Briefly, libraries were prepared using an Illumina protocol and were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq550 platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using 2 × 75 bp paired-end reads. These reads were preprocessed to remove low-quality sequences. Useful reads were mapped against the set of transcripts available for C. annuum species in the NCBI database (assembly UCD10Xv1.1; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF_002878395.1, accessed on 10 February 2023) using Bowtie2 v2.5.1 [56]. Transcript counts were obtained using Samtools v1.3.1 [57].
Differential expression analyses were done using DEgenes-Hunter v0.98 [58]. This R pipeline examined the relative change in expression between the different samples using different algorithms (EdgeR, DESeq2, Limma, and NOISeq) which applied their own normalizations and statistical tests to validate the whole experiment. On the other hand, an analysis of the time course of CaPODs’ gene expression was performed, considering as references the expression levels found in green fruits (G). Raw data are accessible at the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository under the accession PRJNA668052. This reference pepper fruit transcriptome, and differentially expressed (DE) genes among the analyzed ripening stages and the NO treatment, involved the analysis of 24 biological replicates corresponding to 5 replicates for each group, except for green fruits, which included 4 replicates.

2.6. Preparation of Fruit Crude Extracts for Non-Denaturing PAGE and POD Activy Assay

Frozen samples of sweet pepper fruits at the different ripening stages and after NO treatment were powdered under liquid nitrogen using an IKA® A11Basic analytical mill (IKA®, Staufen, Germany), and then extracted in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 10% (v/v) glycerol in a final 1:1 (w/v) plant material:buffer ratio. The obtained homogenates were centrifuged at 15,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C and the supernatants were used for enzymatic POD assays. The protein concentration of the samples was determined with the Bio-Rad Protein Assay (Hercules, CA, USA) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Peroxidase (POD) isozymes were separated by non-denaturing PAGE on 8% polyacrylamide gels and the activity was detected as previously described by [59]. Gels were incubated for 20 min in sodium acetate buffer 0.1 M, pH 5.5, containing 3,3-diaminobenzidine 1 mM and H2O2 (0.03%, v/v). Brown bands appeared over a colorless background at the end of the reaction. The specificity of the POD isozymes was corroborated because, in the absence of H2O2, no bands were detected.

2.7. In Vitro Treatment Pepper Green Fruit Samples with Different Chemical Agents

For the in vitro assays, samples from green pepper fruits were pre-incubated with different potential modulators including: 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1), a peroxynitrite (ONOO−) donor and nitrating compound; S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) and S-nitrosocysteine (CysNO) as NO donors; L-cysteine (L-Cys) and reduced glutathione (GSH), as reducing compounds; sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), as H2S donor; and the oxidizing compound hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In all cases, the solutions were freshly prepared before use at a concentration of 5 mM, and the treatments were done at 25 °C for 1 h in the dark, except the treatment with SIN-1 which was at 37 °C for 1 h.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Pepper Genome Contains 75 POD Genes but Only 10 Genes Are Expressed in Pepper Fruits

In this study, a total of 75 POD genes were identified and characterized in the pepper genome and were designated CaPOD1–CaPOD75 based on their chromosomal locations, and, among them, 10 were found to be exclusively expressed in fruits (Table 1). This number of genes is similar to that found in Arabidopsis, which has 73 [6] but less than that from other Solanaceae species such as potato with 102 [8] or tobacco with 200 POD genes [11]. These 75 CaPOD genes were distributed across 12 pepper chromosomes (Figure 2). The encoded CaPOD proteins have a mean molecular mass of 35.6 kDa which is within the range of class III PODs whose subunit size usually ranges from 30–45 kDa [60,61,62]. On the other hand, the subcellular localization of the CaPODs is very diverse with 35 being assigned to plastids, 22 as extracellular, 11 with dual localization (extracellular/cytosol, plastid/vacuole, plastid/Golgi, and plastid/cytosol), 3 in the vacuole, and one in the cytosol (CaPOD28), nucleus (CaPOD37), cytoskeleton (CaPOD65) and peroxisome (CaPOD33). These data are in agreement with previous reports which describe this wide distribution in other plant species [63,64,65,66,67,68].
As previously mentioned, PODs perform various functions which usually are associated with their cellular location. Those that are located in the cytosol and plastids are involved in auxin metabolism, senescence, several biosynthetic pathways, and stress-related processes [18,60].
In the case of hot peppers, it has been described that PODs intervene in the oxidation of capsaicin [69]. Extracellular/apoplastic PODs are very closely related to the apoplastic H2O2 since they participate in cell expansion, development, as well as in defense mechanisms through the formation of polymer cross-linking, lignification, and cell expansion [70]. On the other hand, the vacuole is considered a sink of H2O2 that enters through aquaporins. This cellular compartment also contains a significant number of PODs that, through phenolic substrates, can oxidize this H2O2 with the concomitant generation of the corresponding phenoxyl radical that would be reduced by ascorbate [71].
The analysis of the chromosomal localization of these 75 CaPOD genes is illustrated in Figure 2, where the 10 genes identified in the pepper fruit transcriptome are marked with red asterisks. These genes showed an irregular distribution pattern since the number of genes on each chromosome was dissimilar. The highest number of genes (16) was found in Chr. 2, followed by Chr. 5 with 11 genes, Chr. 4 with 10, Chr 1 that has 7, Chrs. 9 and 10 have 5, 4 genes were present in Chrs. 8 and 12, while Chr. 6 and Chr. 7 harbor 2 genes. Only CaPOD75 could not be assigned to any chromosome. A total of 12 tandem genes were detected in pepper Chr. 2 and contain the highest number, with 7 tandem genes (CaPOD39 to CaPOD46) that encode for plastidial PODs. Tandem gene duplication has been considered one of the major reported gene duplication mechanisms in other plant species. Thus, 15 POD tandem genes in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) [5], 16 POD genes in cassava [62], 24 POD genes in maize [72], and 37 POD genes in Populus trichocarpa [73] have been reported. Figure 2 also shows the co-localization of genetic loci (curved lines) which allows sharing of a genetic factor at a particular locus between two or more characters. All these mechanisms could be considered as strategies of adaption and diversification to diverse external adverse conditions.
As part of the characterization of the CaPOD genes, the presence of cis-regulatory elements in 1500 bp upstream regions from the transcription starting point of the 75 CaPOD genes was evaluated. Figure 3 shows the heatmap analysis of the identified 16 cis-regulatory elements which were clustered into two groups corresponding to hormone-responsive and (a)biotic stress elements. The cis-regulatory element which exerted the most remarkable effect was that of the group of hormone-responsive elements. Thus, ABRE (ACGT-containing abscisic acid response element), which is involved in abscisic acid (ABA) responsiveness, affected CaPOD15, CaPOD49, CaPOD56, CaPOD63, and CPOD73. On the other hand, the promoter sequences of CaPOD24, CaPOD26, and CaPOD49.
It has been reported that ABA content is modulated during pepper ripening, and total carotenoid content, which increased during ripening, was ABA-dependent [74]. Thus, among the ten POD genes that are expressed in fruit, CaPOD34 was the one with the highest ABRE expression, followed by CaPOD1 and CaPOD7.
To examine the evolutionary relationships among genes, we used the identified 75 CaPOD genes and 73 AtPOD genes from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana to construct a maximum likelihood approach tree by using MEGA11. The phylogenetic relationships reveal that CaPOD genes can be further categorized into 4 clusters designated from CI to CIV (Figure 4). It should be noted that the CaPOD genes expressed in fruits (written in red in Figure 3) are differently distributed in these groups. Thus, the group I includes CaPOD10, CaPOD20, CaPOD27, CaPOD34, and CaPOD48; group II includes CaPOD1, CaPOD7, and CaPOD19; and group IV includes CaPOD11 and CaPOD18.
At the amino acid sequence level, the identified 75 CaPODs class III have an average of 330 residues (see Table 1). The alignment of these CaPODs allows to establish a total of 10 conserved motifs (Figure 5a), whose amino acid sequences are shown in Figure 5b. The most remarkable issue from the sequences is that motif 1 holds the active site, whereas motif 3 includes the heam-ligand binding site for the Fe(III) protoporphyrin IX. Furthermore, the class III peroxidase contains two calcium atoms and has a similar 3-D structure with 4 disulfide bonds, based on the conserved Cys residue pairs, and a salt bridge motif containing invariant Asp and Arg residues [68,75].

3.2. The Expression of the CaPOD Genes Is Mainly Downregulated during Fruit Ripening. Exogenous NO Gas Only Exerts a Positive Modulation of CaPOD 13, 37, and 39

Figure 6 shows the time-course expression analysis of CaPOD genes during ripening. Thus, CaPOD1 and CaPOD7 were upregulated, whereas CaPOD10, CaPOD11, CaPOD19, CaPOD20, CaPOD27, CaPOD34, and CaPOD48 were downregulated, and only CaPOD18 was unaffected. On the other hand, the effect of NO was positive in CaPOD11 and CaPOD34, while the other CaPOD genes were not significantly affected by this RNS. These data indicate that most CaPODs may play a role in the fruit ripening process, whereas CaPOD11 and CaPOD34 could be involved in the effect provoked by treatment with NO.
In the Chinese pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) a total of 94 PbPOD genes have been identified, from which 41 were expressed in fruits, and among them, a group of 5 PbPOD genes, particularly PbPOD2, PbPOD22, PbPOD34, PbPOD64, and PbPOD75 were associated to a change in the content of lignin during the development of the fruits [19,76]. On the other hand, the information on the exogenous application of NO in fruit ripening indicates that this gas molecule affects multiple enzymatic systems which are involved in H2O2 decomposition such as catalase or ascorbate peroxidases. However, to the best of our knowledge, the effect of exogenous NO on the expression of CaPOD genes during fruit ripening has not been studied thus far.

3.3. Pepper Fruits Have Four CaPOD Isozymes (CaPOD I–IV) and POD IV Is Significantly Modulated by NO-Derived Molecules and Reducing Agents

To get deeper insights into the function of the PODs during pepper fruit ripening and the effect of NO, an analysis was made at the enzymatic activity level. Figure 7a shows the in-gel staining POD isozymes analysis in pepper fruits at different ripening stages: immature green (G), breaking point (BP1), BP2 with and without NO (BP2 + NO and BP2 − NO, respectively), and ripe red (R), as previously characterized (Figure 1). Four POD isozymes were identified in the assays, designated CaPOD I to CaPOD IV, according to their increasing electrophoretic mobility in the gel, and it was observed that they were slightly modulated during ripening and by NO. Figure 7b depicts the relative activity quantification considering all the POD isozymes present at each ripening stage. Thus, a slight increase in the total activity in red pepper compared to green was observed. On the other hand, in the intermediate stage (BP2), the effect of NO in total activity seems to be not significant, although POD IV seems to be positively modulated.
The number of POD isozymes is highly variable depending on both the plant species as well as the organ analyzed. For example, in the halophyte Cakile maritima, four POD isozymes have been found in leaves and 5 PODs in roots, and they were differently modulated under salinity and potassium deficiency [77]. During the development and ripening of tomato fruits, it has been described that the number of POD isozymes is different in the mesocarp and in the skin. Thus, in the skin, the number of POD isozymes increased from one to 4 PODs, whereas in the mesocarp, the increase was from 1 to 2 POD isozymes. In both cases, the total POD activity was enhanced, this being associated with the regulation of fruit growth by cross-linking cell wall polymers within the tomato skin, thus mechanically thickening the walls and terminating growth [64,72,78,79]. In the case of pepper fruit C. annuum cv. Padrón, whose capsaicinoid content increases during ripening, this phenomenon was associated with a decrease in total POD activity, where the acidic POD isozymes increased while the basic POD isozymes decreased [80].
To gain deeper insights into how each specific POD isozyme might be influenced by the NO treatment, in vitro analyses with different potential modulators on the activity of the POD isozymes identified in green pepper fruits were carried out by non-denaturing PAGE (Figure 8a). In this case, we focused on CaPOD II and IV because they were the most prominent isozymes. The relative quantification of each POD isozyme showed that the CaPOD II was slightly inhibited (around 10%) by the nitrating agent SIN-1, an ONOO− donor, by reduced glutathione (GSH), by the NO donors nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) and nitrosocysteine (CysNO), but it was unaffected by NaHS or H2O2. However, the effect of these potential modulators was most evident in the case of CaPOD IV, since a full inhibition by SIN-1, GSH, and Cys was observed, about 58% and 55% inhibition by the NO donors GSNO and L-CysNO, respectively, and 60% by NaHS (Figure 8b). On the other hand, H2O2 increased POD IV activity by 10%. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing clear experimental evidence of the interaction of NO-derived molecules on specific POD isozymes in plants.
The fact that POD IV is inhibited 100% by GSH and Cys, and only around 50% by the NO donors, GSNO and CysNO, which, when are chemically dissociated, release NO, and GSH and Cys, respectively, suggests that NO could trigger a process of S-nitrosation of POD IV, and this might exert a protective effect against the inhibitory effect of GSH and Cys. Recently, a similar response was observed in the H2S-generating enzymes L-Cys desulfhydrase activity of pepper fruits [81].
This inhibitory effect of Cys has been described in other enzymes like α-chymotrypsin [82]. There are also some examples showing the effect of L-Cys on peroxidase activity. Thus, 0.25% L-Cys reduced the activities of POD and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzymes in litchi fruit thus delaying pericarp browning after postharvest [83]. A similar inhibitory effect of L-Cys has been observed on polyphenol oxidase activity avoiding the browning of pear [84] and peach [85] by lowering pH and chelating copper ions. Likewise, the application of L-Cys at 0.5% concentration inhibits polyphenol oxidase activities and alleviates internal browning in plum (Prunus domestica L.) fruit during its storage at low temperatures (1 °C) [86].
At present, it is well recognized that the exogenous application of NO exerts its beneficial effects on fruit quality, particularly during postharvest storage, influencing in many cases the ROS metabolism [87]. The negative effect of NO on the POD activity has been observed in different fruits treated with different NO donors. For example, the browning of fresh-cut potatoes is related among other enzymes to the POD activity. However, the treatment with the NO donor sodium nitroprusside triggers a lower POD activity in fresh-cut potatoes preventing browning events [88]. In kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch. cv. Xuxiang) treated with a solution of 1 µM NO the POD activity was lower than that in control fruit throughout storage, and this was associated with a lower H2O2 level. In fact, the NO treatment also triggered higher activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase, as well as a high content of vitamins C and E, thus contributing to lower H2O2 and malondialdehyde contents. Consequently, all these effects allowed the preservation of the quality of the kiwifruit [89]. The inhibitory effect of L-Cys has been observed in different enzymes. In papaya, guaiacol peroxidase was inhibited by Cys, and modelling assays with the enzyme applying docking analyses with various substrates and inhibitors, it was found that guaiacol and cysteine were the best substrate and inhibitor, respectively [90].
On the other hand, the S-nitrosation is claimed to be a mechanism of protection of thiol groups of some key Cys residues that could be involved in the active center of the target proteins [91]. This supports the idea of the relevance of the redox state of the protein’s environment which could be affected by different thiol-based oxidative posttranslational modifications (oxiPTMs), since besides S-nitrosation, there are other PTMs, such as S-sulfenylation, S-glutathionylation, and persulfidation, that are mediated by H2O2, GSH, and H2S respectively [92]. They are potential competitors among themselves for a certain thiol group, and the final effect will be a consequence of the relative abundance of these molecules near the target protein. In the case of pepper fruit, a very active nitro-oxidative metabolism has been described during ripening, so this mechanism of S-nitrosation must be considered as a post-translational mechanism for regulating POD IV, which allows it to maintain its activity under the nitro-oxidative cellular stress.

4. Conclusions

The present data provide, to our knowledge, the first characterization of the POD genes in pepper plants with special emphasis on fruit. In this organ, a total of 10 POD genes were identified and were differentially modulated during ripening and by the exogenous application of NO gas. On the other hand, the characterization of POD isozymatic activity allowed to identify four isozymes, with CaPOD II being the most prominent whereas CaPOD IV was the most significantly affected by NO-derived molecules as well as by reducing agents. This suggests that this isozyme should have a key relevance during the ripening of pepper fruits, as well as being a NO target.

Author Contributions

S.G.-G. performed bioinformatics analyses. M.A.M.-V. did biochemical analyses. F.J.C. and J.M.P. designed the work, drove and coordinated the tasks. F.J.C. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Our research is supported by a European Regional Development Fund cofinanced grants from the Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2019-103924GB-I00), the AEI (10.13039/501100011033) and Junta de Andalucía (P18-FR-1359), Spain.

Data Availability Statement

Sequence Read Archive (SRA) data are available at the following link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA668052 (accessed on 28 May 2020).

Acknowledgments

M.A.M.-V. acknowledges a contract (PRE2020-093882) from the Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain. The provision of pepper fruits by Syngenta Seeds Ltd. (El Ejido, Almería, Spain) is acknowledged, particularly thanks to Víctor J. Domínguez, Lidia Martín, and Manuel Solís. The valuable technical assistance of María J. Campos and Carmelo Ruiz-Torres is deeply acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pandey, V.P.; Awasthi, M.; Singh, S.; Tiwari, S.; Dwivedi, U.N. A Comprehensive Review on Function and Application of Plant Peroxidases. Biochem. Anal. Biochem. 2017, 6, 1000308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Passardi, F.; Penel, C.; Dunand, C. Performing the Paradoxical: How Plant Peroxidases Modify the Cell Wall. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mathé, C.; Barre, A.; Jourda, C.; Dunand, C. Evolution and Expression of Class III Peroxidases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 500, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kidwai, M.; Ahmad, I.Z.; Chakrabarty, D. Class III Peroxidase: An Indispensable Enzyme for Biotic/Abiotic Stress Tolerance and a Potent Candidate for Crop Improvement. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 1381–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xiao, H.; Wang, C.; Khan, N.; Chen, M.; Fu, W.; Guan, L.; Leng, X. Genome-Wide Identification of the Class III POD Gene Family and Their Expression Profiling in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L). BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tognolli, M.; Penel, C.; Greppin, H.; Simon, P. Analysis and Expression of the Class III Peroxidase Large Gene Family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 2002, 288, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shang, H.; Fang, L.; Qin, L.; Jiang, H.; Duan, Z.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Z.; Cheng, G.; Bao, Y.; Xu, J.; et al. Genome-Wide Identification of the Class III Peroxidase Gene Family of Sugarcane and Its Expression Profiles under Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1101665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, X.; Yuan, J.; Luo, W.; Qin, M.; Yang, J.; Wu, W.; Xie, X. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the Class III Peroxidase Gene Family in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 593577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aleem, M.; Riaz, A.; Raza, Q.; Aleem, M.; Aslam, M.; Kong, K.; Atif, R.M.; Kashif, M.; Bhat, J.A.; Zhao, T. Genome-Wide Characterization and Functional Analysis of Class III Peroxidase Gene Family in Soybean Reveal Regulatory Roles of GsPOD40 in Drought Tolerance. Genomics 2022, 114, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Passardi, F.; Longet, D.; Penel, C.; Dunand, C. The Class III Peroxidase Multigenic Family in Rice and Its Evolution in Land Plants. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1879–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheng, L.; Ma, L.; Meng, L.; Shang, H.; Cao, P.; Jin, J. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the Class III Peroxidase Gene Family in Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 916867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shigeto, J.; Tsutsumi, Y. Diverse Functions and Reactions of Class III Peroxidases. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 1395–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jemmat, A.M.; Ranocha, P.; Le Ru, A.; Neel, M.; Jauneau, A.; Raggi, S.; Ferrari, S.; Burlat, V.; Dunand, C. Coordination of Five Class III Peroxidase-Encoding Genes for Early Germination Events of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2020, 298, 110565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jacobowitz, J.R.; Doyle, W.C.; Weng, J.-K. PRX9 and PRX40 Are Extensin Peroxidases Essential for Maintaining Tapetum and Microspore Cell Wall Integrity during Arabidopsis Anther Development. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 848–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Beltramo, C.; Torello Marinoni, D.; Perrone, I.; Botta, R. Isolation of a Gene Encoding for a Class III Peroxidase in Female Flower of Corylus Avellana L. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 4997–5008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Herrero, J.; Esteban Carrasco, A.; Zapata, J.M. Arabidopsis Thaliana Peroxidases Involved in Lignin Biosynthesis: In Silico Promoter Analysis and Hormonal Regulation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 80, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marin, M.A.; Cano, M.P. Patterns of Peroxidase in Ripening Mango (Mangifera indica, L.) Fruits. J. Food Sci. 1992, 57, 690–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, C.-J.; Chan, Y.-L.; Shien, C.H.; Yeh, K.-W. Molecular Characterization of Fruit-Specific Class III Peroxidase Genes in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 177, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, X.; Jiang, L.; Cai, Y.; Cao, Y. Functional Analysis of Four Class III Peroxidases from Chinese Pear Fruit: A Critical Role in Lignin Polymerization. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Minibayeva, F.; Beckett, R.P.; Kranner, I. Roles of Apoplastic Peroxidases in Plant Response to Wounding. Phytochemistry 2015, 112, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Houmani, H.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Mechanical Wounding Promotes Local and Long Distance Response in the Halophyte Cakile maritima through the Involvement of the ROS and RNS Metabolism. Nitric Oxide 2018, 74, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Burnette, F.S. Peroxidase and Its Relationship to Food Flavor and Quality: A Review. J. Food Sci. 1977, 42, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vella, F.M.; Calandrelli, R.; Laratta, B. Influence of Ripening on Polyphenolic Content, Degradative, and Browning Enzymes in Cantaloupe Varieties (C. melo L.). Horticulturae 2021, 7, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Punia Bangar, S.; Trif, M.; Ozogul, F.; Kumar, M.; Chaudhary, V.; Vukic, M.; Tomar, M.; Changan, S. Recent Developments in Cold Plasma-Based Enzyme Activity (Browning, Cell Wall Degradation, and Antioxidant) in Fruits and Vegetables. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 1958–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mateos, R.M.; Jiménez, A.; Román, P.; Romojaro, F.; Bacarizo, S.; Leterrier, M.; Gómez, M.; Sevilla, F.; Del Río, L.A.; Corpas, F.J.; et al. Antioxidant Systems from Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): Involvement in the Response to Temperature Changes in Ripe Fruits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 9556–9580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J.; Del Río, L.A.; López-Huertas, E. Pepper Fruit as a Model to Study the Metabolism of Antioxidants, ROS and RNS. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 75, S39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guevara, L.; Domínguez-Anaya, M.Á.; Ortigosa, A.; González-Gordo, S.; Díaz, C.; Vicente, F.; Corpas, F.J.; Pérez Del Palacio, J.; Palma, J.M. Identification of Compounds with Potential Therapeutic Uses from Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Fruits and Their Modulation by Nitric Oxide (NO). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Naves, E.R.; de Ávila Silva, L.; Sulpice, R.; Araújo, W.L.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Peres, L.E.P.; Zsögön, A. Capsaicinoids: Pungency beyond Capsicum. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aza-González, C.; Núñez-Palenius, H.G.; Ochoa-Alejo, N. Molecular Biology of Capsaicinoid Biosynthesis in Chili Pepper (Capsicum Spp.). Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30, 695–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Srinivasan, K. Biological Activities of Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum) and Its Pungent Principle Capsaicin: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 1488–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Corpas, F.J.; Freschi, L.; Palma, J.M. ROS Metabolism and Ripening of Fleshy Fruits. In Advances in Botanical Research; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  32. Corpas, F.J.; Freschi, L.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; Mioto, P.T.; González-Gordo, S.; Palma, J.M. Nitro-Oxidative Metabolism during Fruit Ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3449–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chaki, M.; Álvarez de Morales, P.; Ruiz, C.; Begara-Morales, J.C.; Barroso, J.B.; Corpas, F.J.; Palma, J.M. Ripening of Pepper (Capsicum annuum) Fruit Is Characterized by an Enhancement of Protein Tyrosine Nitration. Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 637–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; Mateos, R.M.; Codesido, V.; Corpas, F.J.; Palma, J.M. Characterization of the Galactono-1,4-Lactone Dehydrogenase from Pepper Fruits and Its Modulation in the Ascorbate Biosynthesis. Role of Nitric Oxide. Redox Biol. 2017, 12, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. González-Gordo, S.; Bautista, R.; Claros, M.G.; Cañas, A.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Nitric Oxide-Dependent Regulation of Sweet Pepper Fruit Ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4557–4570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; González-Gordo, S.; Cañas, A.; Campos, M.J.; Paradela, A.; Corpas, F.J.; Palma, J.M. Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Fruits Contain an Atypical Peroxisomal Catalase That Is Modulated by Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. González-Gordo, S.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Superoxide Radical Metabolism in Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Fruits Is Regulated by Ripening and by a NO-Enriched Environment. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. González-Gordo, S.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; López-Jaramillo, J.; Muñoz-Vargas, M.A.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Nitric Oxide (NO) Differentially Modulates the Ascorbate Peroxidase (APX) Isozymes of Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Fruits. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chu-Puga, Á.; González-Gordo, S.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. NADPH Oxidase (Rboh) Activity Is Up Regulated during Sweet Pepper (Capsicum Annuum L.) Fruit Ripening. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. González-Gordo, S.; Cañas, A.; Muñoz-Vargas, M.A.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Lipoxygenase (LOX) in Sweet and Hot Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Fruits during Ripening and under an Enriched Nitric Oxide (NO) Gas Atmosphere. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; Mioto, P.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. S-Nitrosoglutathione Reductase (GSNOR) Activity Is Down-Regulated during Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Fruit Ripening. Nitric Oxide 2017, 68, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mateos, R.M.; Bonilla-Valverde, D.; del Río, L.A.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. NADP-Dehydrogenases from Pepper Fruits: Effect of Maturation. Physiol. Plant 2009, 135, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Muñoz-Vargas, M.A.; González-Gordo, S.; Cañas, A.; López-Jaramillo, J.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Endogenous Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Is Up-Regulated during Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Fruit Ripening. In Vitro Analysis Shows That NADP-Dependent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (ICDH) Activity Is Inhibited by H2S and NO. Nitric Oxide 2018, 81, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Muñoz-Vargas, M.A.; González-Gordo, S.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Inhibition of NADP-Malic Enzyme Activity by H2S and NO in Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Fruits. Physiol. Plant 2020, 168, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. González-Gordo, S.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Small Heat Shock Protein (sHSP) Gene Family from Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Fruits: Involvement in Ripening and Modulation by Nitric Oxide (NO). Plants 2023, 12, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mistry, J.; Finn, R.D.; Eddy, S.R.; Bateman, A.; Punta, M. Challenges in Homology Search: HMMER3 and Convergent Evolution of Coiled-Coil Regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, e121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mistry, J.; Chuguransky, S.; Williams, L.; Qureshi, M.; Salazar, G.A.; Sonnhammer, E.L.L.; Tosatto, S.C.E.; Paladin, L.; Raj, S.; Richardson, L.J.; et al. Pfam: The Protein Families Database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D412–D419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; DeBarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A Toolkit for Detection and Evolutionary Analysis of Gene Synteny and Collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Subramanian, B.; Gao, S.; Lercher, M.J.; Hu, S.; Chen, W.-H. Evolview v3: A Webserver for Visualization, Annotation, and Management of Phylogenetic Trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W270–W275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bailey, T.L.; Elkan, C. Fitting a Mixture Model by Expectation Maximization to Discover Motifs in Biopolymers. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 1994, 2, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Horton, P.; Park, K.-J.; Obayashi, T.; Fujita, N.; Harada, H.; Adams-Collier, C.J.; Nakai, K. WoLF PSORT: Protein Localization Predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W585–W587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a Database of Plant Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements and a Portal to Tools for in Silico Analysis of Promoter Sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast Gapped-Read Alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup The Sequence Alignment/Map Format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gayte, I.G.; Moreno, R.B.; Zonjic, P.S.; Claros, M.G. DEgenes Hunter—A Flexible R Pipeline for Automated RNA-Seq Studies in Organisms without Reference Genome. Genom. Comput. Biol. 2017, 3, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ádám, A.L.; Bestwick, C.S.; Barna, B.; Mansfield, J.W. Enzymes Regulating the Accumulation of Active Oxygen Species during the Hypersensitive Reaction of Bean to Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. Planta 1995, 197, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hiraga, S.; Sasaki, K.; Ito, H.; Ohashi, Y.; Matsui, H. A Large Family of Class III Plant Peroxidases. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Almagro, L.; Gómez Ros, L.V.; Belchi-Navarro, S.; Bru, R.; Ros Barceló, A.; Pedreño, M.A. Class III Peroxidases in Plant Defence Reactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wu, C.; Ding, X.; Ding, Z.; Tie, W.; Yan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, H.; Hu, W. The Class III Peroxidase (POD) Gene Family in Cassava: Identification, Phylogeny, Duplication, and Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Barceló, A.R.; Ferrer, M.A.; Florenciano, E.G.; Muñoz, R. The Tonoplast Localization of Two Basic Isoperoxidases of High PI in Lupinus. Bot. Acta 1991, 104, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Andrews, J.; Adams, S.R.; Burton, K.S.; Evered, C.E. Subcellular Localization of Peroxidase in Tomato Fruit Skin and the Possible Implications for the Regulation of Fruit Growth. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 2185–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Welinder, K.G.; Justesen, A.F.; Kjaersgård, I.V.H.; Jensen, R.B.; Rasmussen, S.K.; Jespersen, H.M.; Duroux, L. Structural Diversity and Transcription of Class III Peroxidases from Arabidopsis thaliana. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 6063–6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cosio, C.; Dunand, C. Specific Functions of Individual Class III Peroxidase Genes. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 391–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lüthje, S.; Meisrimler, C.-N.; Hopff, D.; Schütze, T.; Köppe, J.; Heino, K. Class III Peroxidases. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1072, 687–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lüthje, S.; Martinez-Cortes, T. Membrane-Bound Class III Peroxidases: Unexpected Enzymes with Exciting Functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bernal, M.A.; Calderon, A.A.; Pedreno, M.A.; Munoz, R.; Ros Barcelo, A.; Merino de Caceres, F. Capsaicin Oxidation by Peroxidase from Capsicum annuum (variety annuum) Fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1993, 41, 1041–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Smirnoff, N.; Arnaud, D. Hydrogen Peroxide Metabolism and Functions in Plants. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 1197–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ferreres, F.; Figueiredo, R.; Bettencourt, S.; Carqueijeiro, I.; Oliveira, J.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Pereira, D.M.; Valentão, P.; Andrade, P.B.; Duarte, P.; et al. Identification of Phenolic Compounds in Isolated Vacuoles of the Medicinal Plant Catharanthus roseus and Their Interaction with Vacuolar Class III Peroxidase: An H2O2 Affair? J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2841–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Han, G.; Zhu, S. Systematic Analysis of Maize Class III Peroxidase Gene Family Reveals a Conserved Subfamily Involved in Abiotic Stress Response. Gene 2015, 566, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ren, L.-L.; Liu, Y.-J.; Liu, H.-J.; Qian, T.-T.; Qi, L.-W.; Wang, X.-R.; Zeng, Q.-Y. Subcellular Relocalization and Positive Selection Play Key Roles in the Retention of Duplicate Genes of Populus Class III Peroxidase Family. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2404–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Tian, S.-L.; Li, L.; Tian, Y.-Q.; Shah, S.N.M.; Gong, Z.-H. Effects of Abscisic Acid on Capsanthin Levels in Pepper Fruit. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 141, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lüthje, S.; Ramanathan, K. In Silico Analysis of Class III Peroxidases: Hypothetical Structure, Ligand Binding Sites, Posttranslational Modifications, and Interaction with Substrates. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2139, 325–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cao, Y.; Han, Y.; Meng, D.; Li, D.; Jin, Q.; Lin, Y.; Cai, Y. Structural, Evolutionary, and Functional Analysis of the Class III Peroxidase Gene Family in Chinese Pear (Pyrus bretschneideri). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Houmani, H.; Debez, A.; de Freitas-Silva, L.; Abdelly, C.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Potassium (K+) Starvation-Induced Oxidative Stress Triggers a General Boost of Antioxidant and NADPH-Generating Systems in the Halophyte Cakile maritima. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Andrews, J.; Malone, M.; Thompson, D.S.; Ho, L.C.; Burton, K.S. Peroxidase Isozyme Patterns in the Skin of Maturing Tomato Fruit. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Andrews, J.; Adams, S.R.; Burton, K.S.; Edmondson, R.N. Partial Purification of Tomato Fruit Peroxidase and Its Effect on the Mechanical Properties of Tomato Fruit Skin. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 2393–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Estrada, B.; Bernal, M.A.; Díaz, J.; Pomar, F.; Merino, F. Fruit Development in Capsicum annuum:  Changes in Capsaicin, Lignin, Free Phenolics, and Peroxidase Patterns. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 6234–6239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Muñoz-Vargas, M.A.; López-Jaramillo, J.; González-Gordo, S.; Paradela, A.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. H2S-Generating Cytosolic L-Cysteine Desulfhydrase (LCD) and Mitochondrial D-Cysteine Desulfhydrase (DCD) from Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Are Regulated during Fruit Ripening and by Nitric Oxide (NO). Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2023. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Asgharzadeh, S.; Shareghi, B.; Farhadian, S.; Tirgir, F. Effect of Free L-Cysteine on the Structure and Function of α-Chymotrypsin. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 280, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ali, S.; Khan, A.S.; Malik, A.U. Postharvest L-Cysteine Application Delayed Pericarp Browning, Suppressed Lipid Peroxidation and Maintained Antioxidative Activities of Litchi Fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 121, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhou, X.; Xiao, Y.; Meng, X.; Liu, B. Full Inhibition of Whangkeumbae Pear Polyphenol Oxidase Enzymatic Browning Reaction by L-Cysteine. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wu, X.; Yuan, J.; Wang, X.; Yu, M.; Ma, R.; Yu, Z. Synergy of Nitric Oxide and 1-Methylcyclopropene Treatment in Prolong Ripening and Senescence of Peach Fruit. Foods 2021, 10, 2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Banin Sogvar, O.; Razavi, F.; Rabiei, V.; Gohari, G. Postharvest Application of L-Cysteine to Prevent Enzymatic Browning of “Stanley” Plum Fruit during Cold Storage. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Corpas, F.J.; Palma, J.M. Nitric Oxide on/off in Fruit Ripening. Plant Biol. 2018, 20, 805–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Dai, Y.; Xie, H.; Zhao, X.; Zheng, Y. The Effect of Sodium Nitroprusside Treatment on Storage Ability of Fresh-Cut Potato. Foods 2023, 12, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Zhu, S.; Sun, L.; Liu, M.; Zhou, J. Effect of Nitric Oxide on Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Enzymes in Kiwifruit during Storage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 2324–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pandey, V.P.; Singh, S.; Jaiswal, N.; Awasthi, M.; Pandey, B.; Dwivedi, U.N. Papaya Fruit Ripening: ROS Metabolism, Gene Cloning, Characterization and Molecular Docking of Peroxidase. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2013, 98, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Poole, L.B. The Basics of Thiols and Cysteines in Redox Biology and Chemistry. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 80, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Corpas, F.J.; González-Gordo, S.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.; Muñoz-Vargas, M.A.; Palma, J.M. Thiol-Based Oxidative Posttranslational Modifications (OxiPTMs) of Plant Proteins. Plant Cell Physiol. 2022, 63, 889–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 12 01013 g001 550
Figure 1. Representative model of the experimental design used in this study with the phenotype of sweet pepper (C. annuum L.) fruits at different stages and treatments: immature green, breaking point 1 (BP1), breaking point 2 without nitric oxide (NO) treatment (BP2 − NO), breaking point 2 with NO treatment (BP2 + NO), and ripe red. Pepper fruits were subjected to a NO-enriched atmosphere (5 ppm) in a methacrylate box for one hour and then were stored at room temperature (RT) for 3 days. Reproduced from [35] with permission from Oxford University Press Journal and Copyright Clearance Center (2019).
Figure 1. Representative model of the experimental design used in this study with the phenotype of sweet pepper (C. annuum L.) fruits at different stages and treatments: immature green, breaking point 1 (BP1), breaking point 2 without nitric oxide (NO) treatment (BP2 − NO), breaking point 2 with NO treatment (BP2 + NO), and ripe red. Pepper fruits were subjected to a NO-enriched atmosphere (5 ppm) in a methacrylate box for one hour and then were stored at room temperature (RT) for 3 days. Reproduced from [35] with permission from Oxford University Press Journal and Copyright Clearance Center (2019).
Antioxidants 12 01013 g001
Antioxidants 12 01013 g002 550
Figure 2. Synteny analysis of CaPOD genes. Pepper chromosomes (Chr. 1–12) are represented in different colors. Grey curved lines within the scheme refer to the co-localization of genetic loci in the pepper genome. Collinear relationships between CaPOD genes are drawn in orange. Tandem duplication for CaPOD genes is indicated with blue lines. Red asterisks indicate those CaPOD genes identified in the transcriptome of sweet pepper fruit.
Figure 2. Synteny analysis of CaPOD genes. Pepper chromosomes (Chr. 1–12) are represented in different colors. Grey curved lines within the scheme refer to the co-localization of genetic loci in the pepper genome. Collinear relationships between CaPOD genes are drawn in orange. Tandem duplication for CaPOD genes is indicated with blue lines. Red asterisks indicate those CaPOD genes identified in the transcriptome of sweet pepper fruit.
Antioxidants 12 01013 g002
Antioxidants 12 01013 g003 550
Figure 3. Heatmap of cis-regulatory elements corresponding to the 1500 bp upstream region from the transcription start point of CaPOD genes. The distribution of these elements in the promoter sequence is also shown. The cis-regulatory elements were grouped according to their functional implications as hormone-responsive elements and abiotic/biotic stress-responsive elements. CaPOD genes identified in the sweet pepper fruit transcriptome are highlighted in red. Motifs were identified from the PlantCARE database.
Figure 3. Heatmap of cis-regulatory elements corresponding to the 1500 bp upstream region from the transcription start point of CaPOD genes. The distribution of these elements in the promoter sequence is also shown. The cis-regulatory elements were grouped according to their functional implications as hormone-responsive elements and abiotic/biotic stress-responsive elements. CaPOD genes identified in the sweet pepper fruit transcriptome are highlighted in red. Motifs were identified from the PlantCARE database.
Antioxidants 12 01013 g003
Antioxidants 12 01013 g004 550
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationships between pepper and Arabidopsis POD genes. Clusters (I–IV) are displayed in different colors. Clusters were divided into different subgroups (a–d) according to their evolutionary distance. Species abbreviations: At (Arabidopsis thaliana), Ca (Capsicum annuum). Those CaPODs identified in the transcriptome of sweet pepper fruit are highlighted in red.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationships between pepper and Arabidopsis POD genes. Clusters (I–IV) are displayed in different colors. Clusters were divided into different subgroups (a–d) according to their evolutionary distance. Species abbreviations: At (Arabidopsis thaliana), Ca (Capsicum annuum). Those CaPODs identified in the transcriptome of sweet pepper fruit are highlighted in red.
Antioxidants 12 01013 g004
Antioxidants 12 01013 g005 550
Figure 5. Identification and position of consensus amino acid motifs for pepper CaPODs. (a) Distribution of conserved motifs. The distribution of conserved motifs numbered 1–10 of the 75 pepper PODs is represented by boxes of different colors. (b) Amino acids sequence of the motifs. Ten amino acid motifs with various were identified and are represented with different sizes. The height of each amino acid symbol is proportional to the degree of conservation in the consensus sequences depicted in the ten motifs. Sequence logos of conserved motifs were created by MEME.
Figure 5. Identification and position of consensus amino acid motifs for pepper CaPODs. (a) Distribution of conserved motifs. The distribution of conserved motifs numbered 1–10 of the 75 pepper PODs is represented by boxes of different colors. (b) Amino acids sequence of the motifs. Ten amino acid motifs with various were identified and are represented with different sizes. The height of each amino acid symbol is proportional to the degree of conservation in the consensus sequences depicted in the ten motifs. Sequence logos of conserved motifs were created by MEME.
Antioxidants 12 01013 g005
Antioxidants 12 01013 g006 550
Figure 6. Time-course expression analysis of CaPOD genes (RNA-Seq) from pepper fruits. Differences in temporal expression patterns between different ripening stages of sweet pepper fruit and the effect of NO treatment on genes encoding different POD isoforms are shown. Samples corresponding to immature green (G), breaking point 1 (BP1), breaking point 2 with and without NO treatment (BP2 + NO and BP2 − NO, respectively), and red (R) were used. Diamonds indicate statistically significant changes in expression levels (p < 0.05) in comparison to immature green fruits (G). Green line: BP2 fruits treated with NO. Red line: untreated fruits.
Figure 6. Time-course expression analysis of CaPOD genes (RNA-Seq) from pepper fruits. Differences in temporal expression patterns between different ripening stages of sweet pepper fruit and the effect of NO treatment on genes encoding different POD isoforms are shown. Samples corresponding to immature green (G), breaking point 1 (BP1), breaking point 2 with and without NO treatment (BP2 + NO and BP2 − NO, respectively), and red (R) were used. Diamonds indicate statistically significant changes in expression levels (p < 0.05) in comparison to immature green fruits (G). Green line: BP2 fruits treated with NO. Red line: untreated fruits.
Antioxidants 12 01013 g006
Antioxidants 12 01013 g007 550
Figure 7. Isozyme peroxidase (POD) activity of sweet pepper fruits at different ripening stages: immature green (G), breaking point 1 (BP1), breaking point 2 with and without NO treatment (BP2 + NO and BP2 − NO, respectively), and red ripe (R). (a) In-gel isozyme profile of POD activity). (b) Total relative quantification of POD isoenzyme activity. Protein samples (28 µg per lane) were separated by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE; 8% acrylamide), and the activity was detected by the 3,3-diaminobenzidine method. POD isozymes were labeled I–IV, according to their increasing electrophoretic mobility.
Figure 7. Isozyme peroxidase (POD) activity of sweet pepper fruits at different ripening stages: immature green (G), breaking point 1 (BP1), breaking point 2 with and without NO treatment (BP2 + NO and BP2 − NO, respectively), and red ripe (R). (a) In-gel isozyme profile of POD activity). (b) Total relative quantification of POD isoenzyme activity. Protein samples (28 µg per lane) were separated by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE; 8% acrylamide), and the activity was detected by the 3,3-diaminobenzidine method. POD isozymes were labeled I–IV, according to their increasing electrophoretic mobility.
Antioxidants 12 01013 g007
Antioxidants 12 01013 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of nitration, S-nitrosation, and reducing agents on the green pepper fruit peroxidase (POD) isozymes analyzed in non-denaturing gels. (a) In-gel isozyme profile of POD activity in 8% acrylamide gels. (b) Densitometric analysis of POD isozymes and their relative quantification (%) was made by the ImageJ program. SIN-1 is a peroxynitrite donor and a nitrating compound. GSNO (S-nitrosoglutathione) and CysNO (nitrosocysteine) are NO donors and nitrosating agents. L-Cys: cysteine. GSH: reduced glutathione. NaHS: sodium hydrosulfide as H2S donor. H2O2: hydrogen peroxide. All treatments were done by pre-incubating the green pepper samples (28 µg protein per lane) with these compounds (5 mM) at 25 °C for 1 h, except with SIN-1, which was pre-incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The number assigned to each peak indicates the percentage of either isozyme activity inhibition (red) or activation (blue) in relation to the control samples (green fruit crude extracts) after the quantification made with the help of the ImageJ program.
Figure 8. Effect of nitration, S-nitrosation, and reducing agents on the green pepper fruit peroxidase (POD) isozymes analyzed in non-denaturing gels. (a) In-gel isozyme profile of POD activity in 8% acrylamide gels. (b) Densitometric analysis of POD isozymes and their relative quantification (%) was made by the ImageJ program. SIN-1 is a peroxynitrite donor and a nitrating compound. GSNO (S-nitrosoglutathione) and CysNO (nitrosocysteine) are NO donors and nitrosating agents. L-Cys: cysteine. GSH: reduced glutathione. NaHS: sodium hydrosulfide as H2S donor. H2O2: hydrogen peroxide. All treatments were done by pre-incubating the green pepper samples (28 µg protein per lane) with these compounds (5 mM) at 25 °C for 1 h, except with SIN-1, which was pre-incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The number assigned to each peak indicates the percentage of either isozyme activity inhibition (red) or activation (blue) in relation to the control samples (green fruit crude extracts) after the quantification made with the help of the ImageJ program.
Antioxidants 12 01013 g008
Table
Table 1. Summary of the 75 peroxidases (POD) genes identified in the pepper (C. annuum L.) genome, and some of the theoretical molecular properties related to the protein encoded by these genes. They include the number of amino acids (aa), molecular mass of the subunit size (kDa), and their subcellular localization. The ten CaPOD genes specifically detected in the sweet pepper fruit transcriptome are highlighted in red. Chr.: chromosome number.
Table 1. Summary of the 75 peroxidases (POD) genes identified in the pepper (C. annuum L.) genome, and some of the theoretical molecular properties related to the protein encoded by these genes. They include the number of amino acids (aa), molecular mass of the subunit size (kDa), and their subcellular localization. The ten CaPOD genes specifically detected in the sweet pepper fruit transcriptome are highlighted in red. Chr.: chromosome number.
Gene Name Loc IDChr.Genomic LocationProtein IDLength (aa)kDaSubcellular Localization
CaPOD1107856092132671822–32673357XP_016556569.133336.7Plastid
CaPOD2107874082145236930–45240796XP_016576451.132635.6Plastid
CaPOD3107874093145249650–45253391XP_016576460.132535.0Extracellular/Cytosol
CaPOD4107874527145319089–45322294XP_016576787.133036.0Plastid/Vacuole
CaPOD51248986521181026768–181036485XP_047268295.131635.2Plastid
CaPOD61078572701213795233–213805050XP_016557678.134338.5Extracellular
CaPOD71078509171252561266–252562231XP_016551241.132135.5Cytosol/Extracellular
CaPOD8107860974284157374–84161490XP_047262346.132535.5Extracellular
CaPOD91078611952126799675–126803192XP_016562044.134938.5Plastid
CaPOD101078540942132359051–132361632XP_016554572.236538.6Plastid/Vacuole
CaPOD111078595842134101328–134102739XP_016560122.232737.2Extracellular
CaPOD121078612832136356851–136358760XP_016562113.133036.9Extracellular
CaPOD131078613032138090335–138091718XP_016562131.131434.1Extracellular
CaPOD141078598132138097485–138098968XP_016560411.131734.9Plastid
CaPOD151078600142139754471–139756109XP_047263156.133036.1Plastid
CaPOD161078600132139760596–139762112XP_016560694.233236.3Plastid
CaPOD171078600122139766060–139767571XP_016560693.233236.8Plastid
CaPOD181078600472141519183–141522229XP_016560733.134632.3Vacuole/Extracellular
CaPOD191078602062144557158–144559429XP_016560965.132936.1Plastid/Vacuole
CaPOD201078603252146620258–146621615XP_016561130.132535.7Extracellular
CaPOD211078606062151534058–151535050XP_016561495.133036.8Plastid
CaPOD221078607722153605126–153606707XP_016561732.232535.4Extracellular/Vacuole
CaPOD231078607732153608247–153609671XP_016561733.232435.2Plastid/Golgi
CaPOD24107863896341679815–41681218XP_016565574.133436.1Plastid
CaPOD251078522673166523190–166526792XP_016552813.134838.2Plastid
CaPOD261078633563201558537–201559836XP_016564726.231734.2Extracellular
CaPOD271078632463217741244–217743566XP_016564563.231934.4Plastid
CaPOD281078559383234661502–234663111XP_016556426.132134.8Cytosol
CaPOD2910786990141635680–1637002XP_016571788.234236.9Extracellular
CaPOD3012489762949153683–9159042XP_047266625.133436.2Extracellular
CaPOD31107868171418957575–18962323XP_047267412.133437.1Extracellular
CaPOD32107868170418997969–19003730XP_016570262.133637.3Extracellular
CaPOD331078677094173753971–173756793XP_016569561.133437.1Peroxisome
CaPOD341078676194192580931–192584741XP_016569421.135038.7Plastid
CaPOD351078676174192606041–192608813XP_016569419.135839.5Extracellular/Vacuole
CaPOD361078534054217269116–217271921XP_016553885.132836.1Extracellular
CaPOD371078672124221465603–221468812XP_016568845.134137.9Nucleus
CaPOD381078693864229843373–229846291XP_016571405.131734.8Vacuole
CaPOD39107853865514775170–14776405XP_016554339.131934.3Plastid/Vacuole
CaPOD40107853869514780107–14781396XP_047268512.132234.5Plastid
CaPOD41107860938514829467–14830757XP_016561858.132234.6Plastid
CaPOD42107866093514861775–14863048XP_016567762.232335.0Plastid
CaPOD43107866094514866055–14867328XP_016567763.132334.9Plastid
CaPOD44107866095514892113–14893410XP_016567764.232234.9Plastid
CaPOD45107866096514942012–14943277XP_016567765.132234.8Plastid
CaPOD46107866097514959711–14960996NP_001311841.132234.7Plastid
CaPOD471078725265164460717–164465181XP_016574676.131533.6Plastid
CaPOD481078711405207103981–207107624NP_001311926.132434.9Plastid
CaPOD491078713765219482810–219484153XP_016573785.232936.1Plastid
CaPOD501078748836180903059–180904045XP_016577077.132836.0Extracellular
CaPOD511078754186224768131–224770315XP_016577619.131934.3Extracellular
CaPOD521078772157172378813–172380213XP_016579397.133135.9Plastid
CaPOD531078782627193247121–193248773XP_016580668.132836.0Plastid
CaPOD541078726428156429677–156430944XP_016574759.233236.2Plastid
CaPOD551078400108161207604–161210209XP_016539187.240034.7Vacuole
CaPOD561078400278161517334–161518904NP_001311508.133236.1Platid
CaPOD571078403188167555454–167557196XP_016539637.132936.4Extracellular
CaPOD5810784221899989788–9993702XP_047252040.132315.7Plastid
CaPOD591078772459194786339–194789611XP_016579420.232836.1Plastid
CaPOD601078772469194812949–194816310XP_016579421.132435.3Extracellular
CaPOD611078419089195714065–195715731XP_016541245.132235.2Extracellular
CaPOD621078418229218350975–218353270XP_016541157.131735.0Plastid
CaPOD6310784491010147112017–147118017XP_047253817.131930.5Extracellular
CaPOD6410784477310150704727–150706012XP_016544608.231734.7Extracellular
CaPOD6510784456310197101087–197107136XP_047253737.130534.3Cytoskeleton
CaPOD6610784355110202596247–202600521XP_016543351.232937.4Plastid
CaPOD6710784472010220335171–220338346XP_016544563.133136.0Plastid
CaPOD68107852745116631728–6635289XP_016553271.234938.7Extracellular
CaPOD691078470251139881353–39882360XP_016546761.133537.2Extracellular
CaPOD7010785261311208823755–208825290XP_016553130.232634.7Plastid
CaPOD71107851630127151271–7153825XP_016552197.133737.8Plastid/Extracellular
CaPOD7210784975412221606397–221607065XP_047256950.134137.5Plastid
CaPOD7312488535312222343207–222343476XP_047257150.131934.9Vacuole
CaPOD7410784962212227194776–227198629XP_016549663.133937.1Plastid
CaPOD75107877264--3993–5513XP_016579433.132935.8Extracellular
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Gordo, S.; Muñoz-Vargas, M.A.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Class III Peroxidases (POD) in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): Genome-Wide Identification and Regulation during Nitric Oxide (NO)-Influenced Fruit Ripening. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051013

AMA Style

González-Gordo S, Muñoz-Vargas MA, Palma JM, Corpas FJ. Class III Peroxidases (POD) in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): Genome-Wide Identification and Regulation during Nitric Oxide (NO)-Influenced Fruit Ripening. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(5):1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051013

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Gordo, Salvador, María A. Muñoz-Vargas, José M. Palma, and Francisco J. Corpas. 2023. "Class III Peroxidases (POD) in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): Genome-Wide Identification and Regulation during Nitric Oxide (NO)-Influenced Fruit Ripening" Antioxidants 12, no. 5: 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop