Abstract
Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s disease and gender differences have been described on several aspects of PD. In the present commentary, we aimed to collect and discuss the currently available evidence on gender differences in PD regarding biomarkers, genetic factors, motor and non-motor symptoms, therapeutic management (including pharmacological and surgical treatment) as well as preclinical studies. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed by searching the Pubmed and Scopus databases with the search strings “biomarkers”, “deep brain stimulation”, “female”, “gender”, “genetic”, “levodopa”, “men”, “male”, “motor symptoms”, “non-motor symptoms”, “Parkinson disease”, “sex”, “surgery”, and “women”. Results: The present review confirms the existence of differences between men and women in Parkinson Disease, pointing out new information regarding evidence from animal models, genetic factors, biomarkers, clinical features and pharmacological and surgical treatment. Conclusions: The overall goal is to acquire new informations about sex and gender differences in Parkinson Disease, in order to develop tailored intervetions.
1. Introduction
It has been known for many years that sex affects morphology and function of the brain; consequently, specific sex-related factors contribute to determining phenotypic differences even in neurodegenerative diseases. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s disease and gender differences have been described on several aspects of PD.
In the present review, we aim to present the currently available evidence on gender differences in PD regarding biomarkers, genetic factors, motor and non-motor symptoms, therapeutic management (including pharmacological and surgical treatment) as well as preclinical studies, starting from 2017’s “The relevance of gender in Parkinson disease: a review” by Picillo et al. and collecting all the new evidence emerged since then [1].
2. Methods
We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed articles published in English from 2017 to present; the most recent of the included publications dates back to 1 June 2022. The search terms “biomarkers”, “deep brain stimulation”, “female”, “gender”, “genetic”, “levodopa”, “men”, “male”, “motor symptoms”, “non-motor symptoms”, “Parkinson disease”, “sex”, “surgery”, and “women” were used. Additional articles were identified by searching the reference lists of identified reviews. Articles are summerized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Detailed results from studies on gender differences in PD reported in the paper from 2017 to present.
3. Results
3.1. Evidence from Animal Models
Preclinical studies often did not consider sex as a variable, so we aim to review evidence of sex differences in PD animal models.
Gender differences in neurotoxicity have been reported, and several research in experimental animals indicates that estrogen protects dopaminergic neurons from various types of toxic injury.
Studies in animal models have shown a greater neurotoxic effect in male than female mice, with a higher depletion of striatal dopamine (DA) in male mice treated with MPTP (1-metyl-4-fenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin) and a major reduction of dopamine transported (DAT) specific binding in the substantia nigra in male mice treated with methamphetamine [63,64,65,66]. Interestingly, when animals were treated with estrogen prior to neurotoxin administration, higher striatal DA concentrations were observed [67,68], suggesting that estrogen may have a role in neuroprotection of DA neurons.
However, the role of estrogens is still unclear, and some data are non consistent with their neuroprotective effect. In a recent study on a rat model of progressive parkinsonism obtained with repeated administrations of low doses of reserpine, ovariectomized female rats presented a lower susceptibility to the effect of reserpine, when compared with male and female intact rats, a result of unclear interpretation. However, overall, female rats presented a lower susceptibility to the deleterious effects of reserpine on DA neurons [69,70].
The MitoPark (MP) mouse, a transgenic mitochondrial impairment model, recapitulates key features of human PD with loss of substantia nigra neurons, depletion of DA in the striatum, loss of voluntary movements, tremor, responsiveness to L-DOPA treatment, so this model spontaneously exhibits progressive motor deficits and neurodegeneration [71]. An advantage of this model is the elimination of the additional pharmacological effects of neurotoxins in DA neurons and non-DA cell types. Studies on gender differences using this model confirmed results obtained with other models, with male MP mice being more affected than female MP mice, and ovariectomized female MP mice showing a similar time course as that of male MP mice [72].
Prodopaminergic or antidopaminergic effects of androgens received less attention than estrogens, but an important question is to determine whether there is an association between androgens and PD in men, and animal models could be useful to evaluate this aspect. Up to date, there is a controversy about the effects of testosterone supplements on dopaminergic function, since both neuroprotective and toxic effects of testosterone are reported [73]. Animal models are recently being used also in studies exploring gender differences in cognition. It was shown that in male rats reduced androgen levels provide powerful and highly selective protection against the negative effects of 6-hydroxydopamine on memory functions [74]. Similarly, in another bilateral nigrostriatal dopamine lesion model of early PD, bilateral injections of 6-hydroxydopamine made in the lateral caudate one day after and/or 28 days before behavioral testings produced deficits in working memory and other executive functions only in male rats with normal circulating androgen levels, whereas in rats where androgen were depleted there were no additional deficits [75]. Therefore, the role of androgens deserves to be further evaluated also in PD patients.
3.2. Genetic Factors
A well-validated genetic risk factor for PD is a mutation in the gene encoding glucocerebrosidase (GBA), with a prevalence of GBA mutations among PD patients of 5–15% [76]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis clarified that there is a gender difference between female and male PD patients, with a higher prevalence of these mutations in PD women [77].
Over the past two decades, research recognized that also mutations in the gene encoding leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are a common risk factor in both monogenic and sporadic forms of Parkinson’s disease [78], and more and more LRRK2 variants have been detected in different cohorts of PD patients with different geographical or ethnic origins. Several studies suggest that LRRK2-associated PD mutations are more common among female PD patients [79]. More recent studies focused on the idea that genetics, sex and the interactions between them drive phenotype: in a cohort of PD patients that carried LRRK2 G2385R variant, gender-related phenotypic differences were observed, since women manifest a more benign disease course, being at lower risk of impairment in activities of daily living and autonomic dysfunction, but also at higher risk to development of mood disorders, as compared to men [80]; similarly, San Luciano et al. demonstrated that the most prevalent LRRK2 mutation, the G2019S, is associated with a similar phenotype between male and female PD patients, even if women had a worse score in part IV of MDS-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDR IV) [81]. Different phenotypes influenced by sex and genetics could also relate to cognitive decline: males with APOE ε4 had a steeper rate of cognitive decline [2]. Moreover, genetics is a relevant topic of research for the determination of PD risk factor and PD protective factors, and can help to understand epidemiologic differences between sexes too. Mitochondrial haplogroups demonstrated a significantly protective effect for PD risk only in females [3]; GAPDH gene variants are associated with an increased PD risk in men [82], while small CGG expansion (41–54 repeats) in the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene, called FMR1 “gray zone” alleles (GZ), are a significant risk factor for parkinsonism, more prominent in men [83].
3.3. Biomarkers
High urate levels have been associated with lower PD risk and with a better PD prognosis, but the association is consistent among men and weaker among women [1]. In addition, the association varied significantly by age among women, showing a protective effect only in women above 70 years, when urate levels are comparable to those in men, suggesting that estrogens may predominate in determining the lower risk of PD among women [84], suggesting a sex-specific protective effect of uric acid (UA) on nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons [4].
Serum homocysteine has been studied as another potential biomarker for PD progression, and, interestingly, such association showed a sex difference: elevated serum homocysteine levels are associated with a greater motor impairment in PD males and poorer cognitive performance in PD females [5]. In the study just mentioned, cognitive functions were measured using a test battery including Mini Mental State Examination, Auditory verbal learning test, Copy and Delayed recall of Rey-Osterrieth complex figure, Clock drawing test, Boston naming test, Verbal fluency tasks, Symbol digit modality test, Trail making test and Stroop color word interference test while the severity of motor symptoms was assessed using MDS-UPDRS part III.
Some recent studies, aimed to evaluate circulating lipids as potential PD biomarkers, also showed gender differences. N-acylphosphatidylethanolamines, generally referred to by the acronym NAPE, are a class of phospholipids present at low concentrations in cellular membranes. Particular circulating NAPE species serum levels are significantly lower in PD patients compared to healthy controls, with a stronger decrement in female PD patients [6]. Luca et al. evaluated the role of serum lipid fractions as potential biomarkers for cognitive decline in a large cohort of PD patients, finding a sex-specific different contribute of lipids fractions on cognitive performance in PD, i.e., the association between hypertriglyceridemia and executive dysfunction only in women [7].
Other biomarkers, such as cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid 1–42, total tau, phosphorylated tau and unphosphorylated total alpha-synuclein showed no significant differences according to gender as demonstrated in a study conducted on 361 PD patients. The mean age and age at PD onset of the patients were 61.4 ± 9.8 years and 59.6 ± 9.8 years, respectively, and 238 (66%) patients were men. The mean MDS-UPDRS past III score was 21.2 ± 8.9. [8].
3.4. Clinical Features
3.4.1. Motor Symptoms
The first study that explored gender differences in PD motor symptoms dates back to 2007 and involved about 250 de novo PD patients, showing that: (1) age at onset was 2.1 years later in women (53.4 years) than in men (51.3 years); (2) women more often presented with tremor (67%) than men (48%); (3) women had a 16% higher striatal [123I]FP-CIT single photon emission computed tomography ([123I]FP-CIT) binding than men at symptom onset and throughout the course of PD. These results suggest that, in women, the development of symptomatic PD may be delayed by higher physiological striatal dopamine levels, possibly due to the activity of estrogens [85].
Recently, new data on gender differences in PD were obtained from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database, an international, multiple-site, prospective, longitudinal cohort study. A 5-year longitudinal analysis of a subgroup of 423 patients (65.4% men) from the PPMI cohort showed: (a) a similar increase over time of MDS-UPDRS part III OFF scores in both sexes, with an increase over time of MDS-UPDRS part III ON scores only in men; (b) a significant increase over time in Levodopa equivalent dose (LED) in men as compared to women [9].
Furthermore, in a cross-sectional descriptive survey conducted on 141 community-dwelling PD patients (84 males and 57 females), males reported more rigidity, speech problems, sexual dysfunction, memory problems, and socializing problems than females [10].
Interestingly, a correlation between coffee consumption and motor symptoms in PD patients has been described and the impact of caffeine intake on PD risk and mortality appears to differ by gender. The results of a cross-sectional study on a cohort of 284 PD patients demonstrated that coffee drinkers had lower tremor scores when compared to non-coffee drinkers, and the coffee consumption was inversely related to tremor severity in a dose-dependent manner in de novo PD patients. These relationships were statistically significant only with rest tremor, and not with action tremor. The severity of tremor was measured using tremor scores of MDS-UPDRS part III. The effect of coffee consumption on tremor severity was gender-dependent, and was significant only in men [11].
Moreover, in a study conducted on 415 PD patients, women with PD had significantly lower scores in MDS-UPDRS part III total score and postural tremor item of MDS-UPDRS III compared to men with PD. No significant gender-related differences were found in scores related to other motor symptoms [12].
Just recently, the results of a cohort study conducted in China to investigate the risk factors of motor complications in female patients with PD and the correlation between the occurrence of motor complications and sex hormone levels were published. The data collected showed that female PD patients have a higher incidence of motor complications than males. About sex hormen levels, conflicting data were obtained regarding the correlation between levels of prolactin and wearing-off phenomenon in female PD patients but further research to clarify is needed [13].
3.4.2. Non Motor Symptoms
There is currently a large amount of evidence available on the gender differences in spectrum and severity of non-motor symptoms (NMS) in PD patients, suggesting a possible sex-related effect.It is noteworthy that there are numerous scales for evaluating NMS in PD, and for this reason it can often be difficult to compare the available data.
The Fattori di Rischio Ambientali e Genetici Associati alla Malattia di Parkinson (FRAGAMP) study (a large multicenter case-control study carried out in Central-Southern Italy to evaluate the possible role of environmental and genetic factors in PD) showed that presence of NMS is strongly associated with male rather than female gender. In fact, male sex showed a strong positive association with all NMS compared to women, except for urinary disturbances. Probably, the presence of several NMS, in particular depression and cognitive impairment among PD men, is more strictly linked to the neurodegenerative processes related to PD [14].
A cross-sectional analysis conducted on 569 drug-naïve PD patients in China demonstrated that: (1) the frequencies of sleep/fatigue and mood/apathy were more prevalent in women; (2) the frequencies of urinary and sexual dysfunction (SD) were more prevalent in men; (3) female sex, disease duration, UPDRS III score, depression, and NMSS subcores including sleep/fatigue, mood/apathy, attention/memory, and gastrointestinal were the determinants of quality of life (QoL) in patients with drug-naïve PD. NMS are common and heterogeneous in untreated PD patients and are important determinants of decreased QoL in PD, also presenting differences between genders [15].
SD was subsequently investigated using The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)37 (which is a validated, multidimensional, self-report instrument widely used for male sexual dysfunction) in an observational study that included 203 patients (113 males and 90 females) affected by PD and living in three different Italian regions. The collected data confirmed the higher prevalence of SD in male than in female PD patients. In more detail, the authors demonstrated that: (1) men were significantly more affected by SD than women, but no difference in the severity of the dysfunction emerged between genders; (2) around 85% of PD patients had a stable couple relationship, and about 40% were satisfied with such a relationship. However, about 57% of the patients stated that the disease affected their sexual life, especially due to reduced sexual desire, and the frequency of sexual intercourses. As it was reasonable to expect, also in this cohort of patients there was an impact of NMS on the QoL in PD patients [16].
As for the influence of NMS on QoL, a recent study conducted on 122 PD patients found that female patients reported reduced QoL due to depression and pain in early PD stages (Hoehn & Yahr I-II), while worsening of QoL in advanced PD was reported only by male patients in relation to the deterioration of the cognitive domain [17].
Interestingly, gender differences have also been demonstrated on some poorly investigated aspects of life and care of PD patients. A study conducted on 85 patients (of whom 52% were women) showed that while a spouse or partner is the most likely individual to serve as a caregiver, homebound female PD patients were more likely to be single or widowed compared to men. They were also more likely to lack any caregiver [18].
Moreover, in a retrospective study aimed to describe a sex-specific patient journey in Dutch PD patients during the first 5 years after diagnosis, significant sex differences were described: in the Netherlands, female patients visit most of the healthcare professionals sooner after diagnosis and more frequently than men. In addition, PD-related complications occur earlier in women than in men. A relevant percentage of patients is admitted to nursing homes within 5 years after diagnosis; again, this happens more frequently in women [19].
Anxiety, depression, mobility, emotional well-being, social support and bodily discomfort and psychosocial functioning, assessed with specific validated scales, were significantly worse in female PD patients in an observational study conducted on 157 PD patients [20].
Pain is a frequently reported NMS in PD patients. The currently available evidence proves that pain in PD is more frequent in women rather than men. [21,22]. The mechanisms by which females generally suffer more than males can be due to several biological aspects already discussed in previous literature [86,87,88]. In summary, PD women have lower muscle mass compared to men and this is relevant in relation to the fact that the most frequently reported pain in the course of PD has musculoskeletal characteristics; moreover, PD mostly affect women in postmenopausal phase, when estrogen and progesterone levels decline determining an alteration of perception of pain; lastly, females have a more sophisticated notion of self, which results in a deeper attention to symptoms in comparison to males [87]. Since chronic pain and depression often coexist and since female gender is considered to be a risk factor for pain in PD, we could suggest that managing pain in women could possibly improve their quality of life.
3.5. Pharmacological Treatment
Medical treatment of PD includes levodopa, dopamine agonists, anticholinergics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, catechol-o-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors, amantadine and several other pharmacologic agents. Treatments may differ according to the patient’s symptoms, age, and responses to specific drugs but the choice between them, to date, is still not gender-oriented. In the previous review from our group [1], it was already remarked that similar dopaminergic treatments were assigned to men and women with PD, without gender preference, even if we are now aware of different pharmacokinetics and different outcomes in men and women. Women present a significantly greater bioavailability of L-dopa [23,89] and also lower levodopa clearance levels [90]. Moreover, women are known to develop more frequently levodopa-induced dyskinesias [91] and have an increased risk of the so-called “brittle response” to levodopa, defined as a susceptibility to dyskinesia when treated with small amounts of levodopa [92].
A very recent multicentric study on L-DOPA-naive PD patients receiving for the first time L-DOPA/benserazide formulation showed some interesting gender related-differences in Levodopa pharmacokinetics that could help to explain gender-related differences in levodopa clinical response: female sex and body mass index significantly predicted Area Under the Curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) and, stratifying by gender, body mass index (BMI) predicted half-life (t1/2) only in women [93].
There is a possible relation between different genotypes and the therapeutic response to levodopa, that seems to be affected by sex differences. Sampaio et al. observed that carriers of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) (rs1799836) A and AA genotypes and COMT (rs4680) LL genotype suffered more frequently from levodopa-induced-dyskinesia, but also that there is an increased risk of 2.84-fold for male individuals carrying the MAO-B G allele to develop motor complications when treated with higher doses of levodopa (p = 0.04) [23]. Interestingly, MAO-B encoding gene is located on chromosome X, supporting the hypothesis of the existence of a different dopamine metabolism in men and women due to sexual dimorphism.
Studies investigating the impact of gender on medical treatments in PD are mainly focused on levodopa treatment, with poor evidence available on other antiparkinsonian drugs. Pellecchia et al. analyzed gender differences in clinical responses to treatment with safinamide [24], an antiparkinsonian drug with a peculiar mechanism of action since it acts both as a highly selective and reversible MAO-B inhibitor, and as a blocker of voltage-dependent Na+ and Ca2+ channels and inhibitor of stimulated glutamate release, targeting both dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems [94]. The study revealed higher prevalence of dyskinesia in women compared with males at baseline, with a similar reduction of patients with dyskinesia in both genders (up to 30%) over a 1-year follow-up; the prevalence of any fluctuations was similarly reduced in both genders after safinamide introduction; no gender differences in SAEs were detected [24].
UA levels modification represents another relevant topic to gender-oriented treatment of PD. Higher serum UA levels are associated with a slower disease progression of PD with a clear difference between male and female patients, since this association is markedly stronger in men than in women [95]. Starting from this evidence, Schwarzschild et al. investigated whether women and men with PD differ in their biochemical and clinical responses to long-term treatment with inosine in The Safety of Urate Elevation in Parkinson’s Disease (SURE-PD) trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial of the urate precursor inosine. The study demonstrated potential sex differences with inosine producing greater serum and CSF urate elevations and a slower progression of PD in women than in men [25]. Even if further clinical trials of inosine in both genders are needed and planned in the ongoing SURE-PD3 trial (NCT02642393), these findings encourage consideration of gender-specific therapies of PD.
Lastly, gender differences need to be studied in symptomatic therapies for non motor symptoms too. For instance, PD female patients report pain more frequently than male patients [17,96] and identify it as a determinant of poorer quality of life [96], so we can speculate that females should receive more frequently pain treatment, but, to date, no difference in the frequency or type of pain treatment according to gender is reported in the literature.
3.6. Surgical Treatment
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an accepted treatment for advanced PD when symptoms are no longer managed adequately with medications. There is a gender discrepancy in DBS utilization: female gender is underrepresented among PD patients treated with these surgical procedures, and also women access later to DBS, despite they tend to be more dyskinetic and present more motor fluctuations [1]. Also, primary indications for DBS in PD patients differ by sex, being medication refractory tremor a significative more common indication in males [26]. Speaking of outcomes, no significant differences between genders in clinical outcomes are reported. A recent Italian retrospective study confirms a similar clinical improvement of motor symptoms in males and females, even with some slight differences in the long-term follow-up, as a poorer improvement of bradykinesia at 1-year follow-up and non-dopaminergic features at 10 years follow-up in female patients [27].
In a very recent cross-sectional and longitudinal, prospective, observational, controlled, quasi-experimental, international multicenter study conducted on 505 PD patients treated with DBS, several evidence of a gender gap in DBS for PD emerges: fewer women underwent DBS indication assessments than to be expected from the gender ratio of the general PD population; preoperatively, mean PD duration was longer and dyskinesia more severe in women with PD; DBS was equally clinically efficacious on total QoL, nonmotor, and motor symptoms burden in women and men with PD [97]. Although these data are informative, they do not clarify the underlying reasons for gender disparities outlined here; therefore, further studies are needed to explore this topic.
The existence of gender differences in the impact of DBS on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is controversial, since some studies reported higher improvement in men [28], and some others in women [98].
4. Conclusions
The impact of sex- and gender-related features on neurodegenerative disorders is still far from being fully elucidated. First, it’s important to realize that most of the discussed biological differences between men and women are both sex-related (i.e., genetic, hormonal, reproductive and physical) and gender-related (i.e., environmental influences such as society, culture or history). Moreover, future research should be oriented to uncover the biological basis and the physiopathological mechanisms mediating gender differences in PD. Focus on sex differences should be kept from pre-clinical (e.g., inclusion of female animals and consideration of hormonal states) to clinical studies, since it is more and more evident the necessity of targeted sex-oriented therapies. Similarly, observational, longitudinal post-marketing surveillance studies should also be analyzed with the aim to assess if and how sex and/or gender may affect the effectiveness and/or safety and tolerability of PD medications, as well as the existence of different risks factor and different clinical courses. With regard to the issue of gender differences in antiparkinsonian treatments, our paper reports new evidence upon levodopa and safinamide. The need for personalized medicine according to gender is now generally recognized, but to date no gender-oriented advice is available for PD. There is a lack of data on gender differences in response to antiparkinsonian drugs and adverse events. Future studies are therefore needed to develop gender tailored management in PD. To date, preclinical models of PD suggest that estrogens are neuroprotective, and also clinical studies support this evidence, since women display a less severe PD phenotype than men at presentation, and also severity of PD increases in post-menopausal women compared to pre-menopausal women. Likely, also genetic, epigenetic, sociocultural factors are involved in the complex relationship between gender and neurodegenerative disorders: for example, gender-differences in the quality of life are also related to social factors (such as cultural differences in gender roles). The overall goal should be encouraging clinicians to have special consideration for gender characterization and sex-specific issues in PD.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.C.R., V.A. and M.T.P.; methodology, M.C.R. and V.A.; software, M.C.R., V.A. and M.T.P.; validation, M.T.P., P.B., R.E. and M.P.; formal analysis, M.T.P., V.A., M.C.R. and S.C.; investigation, M.T.P., V.A., M.C.R., M.A. and M.P.; resources, P.B. and M.T.P.; data curation, M.C.R., V.A. and M.T.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.R., V.A. and M.T.P.; writing—review and editing, M.C.R., V.A. and M.T.P.; visualization, M.C.R., V.A. and M.T.P.; supervision, M.T.P.; project administration, M.C.R., V.A. and M.T.P.; funding acquisition, M.T.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Picillo, M.; Nicoletti, A.; Fetoni, V.; Garavaglia, B.; Barone, P.; Pellecchia, M.T. The relevance of gender in Parkinson’s disease: A review. J. Neurol. 2017, 264, 1583–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, Y.; Park, Y.H.; Lee, J.J.; Sohn, Y.H.; Lee, J.M.; Lee, P.H. Gender-specific effect of uric acid on resting-state functional networks in de novo Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2018, 52, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Loesch, D.Z.; Tassone, F.; Mellick, G.D.; Horne, M.; Rubio, J.P.; Bui, M.Q.; Francis, D.; Storey, E. Evidence for the role of FMR1 gray zone alleles as a risk factor for parkinsonism in females. Mov. Disord. 2018, 33, 1178–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baik, K.; Chung, S.J.; Yoo, H.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Jung, J.H.; Sohn, Y.H.; Lee, P.H. Sex-dependent association of urate on the patterns of striatal dopamine depletion in Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020, 27, 773–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, K.; Shen, B.; Li, D.-K.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, J.; Yu, W.-B.; Liu, Z.-Y.; Tang, Y.-L.; Liu, F.-T.; et al. Cognitive characteristics in Chinese non-demented PD patients based on gender difference. Transl. Neurodegener. 2018, 7, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heller, J.; Mirzazade, S.; Romanzetti, S.; Habel, U.; Derntl, B.; Freitag, N.M.; Schulz, J.B.; Dogan, I.; Reetz, K. Impact of gender and genetics on emotion processing in Parkinson’s disease—A multimodal study. Neuroimage Clin. 2018, 18, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luca, A.; Monastero, R.; Cicero, C.E.; Baschi, R.; Donzuso, G.; Mostile, G.; Restivo, V.; Di Giorgi, L.; Caccamo, M.; Zappia, M.; et al. Executive functioning and serum lipid fractions in Parkinson’s disease—A possible sex-effect: The PACOS study. J. Neural Transm. 2022, 129, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, R.; Park, S.; Yoo, D.; Ju Suh, Y.; Jun, J.S.; Jeon, B. Potential Sex-Specific Effects of Apolipoprotein E ε4 on Cognitive Decline in Early Parkinson’s Disease. J. Park. Dis. 2021, 11, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picillo, M.; LaFontant, D.E.; Bressman, S.; Caspell-Garcia, C.; Coffey, C.; Cho, H.R.; Burghardt, E.L.; Dahodwala, N.; Saunders-Pullman, R.; Tanner, C.M.; et al. Sex-Related Longitudinal Change of Motor, Non-Motor, and Biological Features in Early Parkinson’s Disease. J. Park. Dis. 2022, 12, 421–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, J.Y.; Pohlig, R.T.; Habermann, B. Self-Reported Symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease by Sex and Disease Duration. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2017, 39, 1412–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, B.H.; Choi, S.M.; Kim, B.C. Gender-dependent effect of coffee consumption on tremor severity in de novo Parkinson’s disease. BMC Neurol. 2019, 19, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, K.W.; Choi, S.M.; Kim, B.C. Gender differences in motor and non-motor symptoms in early Parkinson disease. Medicine 2022, 101, e28643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, Z.; Wang, X.; Ma, H.; Wang, Z.; Feng, T. Risk factors for motor complications in female patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurol. Sci. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicoletti, A.; Vasta, R.; Mostile, G.; Nicoletti, G.; Arabia, G.; Iliceto, G.; Lamberti, P.; Marconi, R.; Morgante, L.; Barone, P.; et al. Gender effect on non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: Are men more at risk? Park. Relat. Disord. 2017, 35, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, T.; Ou, R.; Liu, H.; Hou, Y.; Wei, Q.; Song, W.; Cao, B.; Chen, Y.; Yuan, X.; Shang, H. Gender and onset age related-differences of non-motor symptoms and quality of life in drug-naïve Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2018, 175, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raciti, L.; De Cola, M.C.; Ortelli, P.; Corallo, F.; Buono, V.L.; Morini, E.; Quattrini, F.; Filoni, S.; Calabrò, R.S. Sexual Dysfunction in Parkinson Disease: A Multicenter Italian Cross-sectional Study on a Still Overlooked Problem. J. Sex. Med. 2020, 17, 1914–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balash, Y.; Korczyn, A.D.; Migirov, A.A.; Gurevich, T. Quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A gender-specific perspective. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2019, 140, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nwabuobi, L.; Barbosa, W.; Sweeney, M.; Oyler, S.; Meisel, T.; Di Rocco, A.; Chodosh, J.; Fleisher, E.J. Sex-related differences in homebound advanced Parkinson’s disease patients. Clin. Interv. Aging 2019, 14, 1371–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vlaanderen, F.P.; de Man, Y.; Krijthe, J.H.; Tanke, M.A.C.; Groenewoud, A.S.; Jeurissen, P.P.T.; Oertelt-Prigione, S.; Munneke, M.; Bloem, B.R.; Meinders, M.J. Sex-Specific Patient Journeys in Early Parkinson’s Disease in the Netherlands. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Farhadi, F.; Vosoughi, K.; Shahidi, G.A.; Delbari, A.; Lökk, J.; Fereshtehnejad, S.M. Sexual dimorphism in Parkinson’s disease: Differences in clinical manifestations, quality of life and psychosocial functioning between males and females. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2017, 13, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zella, M.A.S.; May, C.; Müller, T.; Ahrens, M.; Tönges, L.; Gold, R.; Marcus, K.; Woitalla, D. Landscape of pain in Parkinson’s disease: Impact of gender differences. Neurol. Res. 2019, 41, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeFazio, G.; Antonini, A.; Tinazzi, M.; Gigante, A.F.; Pietracupa, S.; Pellicciari, R.; Bloise, M.; Bacchin, R.; Marcante, A.; Fabbrini, G.; et al. Relationship between pain and motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2017, 24, 974–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sampaio, T.F.; Dos Santos, E.U.D.; de Lima, G.D.C.; Dos Anjos, R.S.G.; da Silva, R.C.; Asano, A.G.C.; Asano, N.M.J.; Crovella, S.; de Souza, P.R.E. MAO-B and COMT Genetic Variations Associated with Levodopa Treatment Response in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 58, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreasi, N.G.; Romito, L.M.; Telese, R.; Cilia, R.; Elia, A.E.; Novelli, A.; Tringali, G.; Messina, G.; Levi, V.; Devigili, G.; et al. Short- and long-term motor outcome of STN-DBS in Parkinson’s Disease: Focus on sex differences. Neurol. Sci. 2022, 43, 1769–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwarzschild, M.A.; Macklin, E.A.; Bakshi, R.; Battacharyya, S.; Logan, R.; Espay, A.J.; Hung, A.Y.; Bwala, G.; Goetz, C.G.; Russell, D.S.; et al. Sex differences by design and outcome in the Safety of Urate Elevation in PD (SURE-PD) trial. Neurology 2019, 93, e1328–e1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Solla, P.; Masala, C.; Liscia, A.; Piras, R.; Ercoli, T.; Fadda, L.; Hummel, T.; Haenher, A.; Defazio, G. Sex-related differences in olfactory function and evaluation of possible confounding factors among patients with Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. 2020, 267, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham, D.S.; Gruber-Baldini, A.L.; Magder, L.S.; McArdle, P.F.; Tom, S.E.; Barr, E.; Schrader, K.; Shulman, L.M. Sex differences in Parkinson’s disease presentation and progression. Park. Relat. Disord. 2019, 69, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishikawa, N.; Iwaki, H.; Shiraishi, T.; Mukai, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Murata, M. Female, aging, difference formulations of DCI, or lower body weight increases AUC4hr of levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2020, 76, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Lu, L.; Pan, Y.; Shen, B.; Xu, S.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L. Depression and associated factors in nondemented Chinese patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2017, 163, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha, A.L.; Oliveira, A.; Sousa, C.; Monteiro, P.; Rosas, M.J.; Vaz, R. Long term mortality of patients with Parkinson’s disease treated with deep brain stimulation in a reference center. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2021, 202, 106486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gee, M.; Dukart, J.; Draganski, B.; Martin, W.W.; Emery, D.; Camicioli, R. Regional volumetric change in Parkinson’s disease with cognitive decline. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 373, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kim, R.; Yoo, D.; Choi, J.H.; Shin, J.H.; Park, S.; Kim, H.J.; Paek, S.H.; Jeon, B. Sex differences in the short-term and long-term effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2019, 68, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oltra, J.; Uribe, C.; Campabadal, A.; Inguanzo, A.; Monté-Rubio, G.C.; Martí, M.J.; Compta, Y.; Valldeoriola, F.; Junque, C.; Segura, B. Sex Differences in Brain and Cognition in de novo Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 13, 791532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oltra, J.; Segura, B.; Uribe, C.; Monté-Rubio, G.C.; Campabadal, A.; Inguanzo, A.; Pardo, J.; Marti, M.J.; Compta, Y.; Valldeoriola, F.; et al. Sex differences in brain atrophy and cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease patients with and without probable rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. J. Neurol. 2022, 269, 1591–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boccalini, C.; Carli, G.; Pilotto, A.; Padovani, A.; Perani, D. Gender differences in dopaminergic system dysfunction in de novo Parkinson’s disease clinical subtypes. Neurobiol. Dis. 2022, 167, 105668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shpiner, D.S.; Di Luca, D.G.; Cajigas, I.; Diaz, J.S.; Margolesky, J.; Moore, H.; Levin, B.E.; Singer, C.; Jagid, J.; Luca, C.C. Gender Disparities in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease. Neuromodulation 2019, 22, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrin, A.J.; Nosova, E.; Co, K.; Book, A.; Iu, O.; Silva, V.; Thompson, C.; McKeown, M.; Stoessl, A.J.; Farrer, M.J.; et al. Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease depression. Park. Relat. Disord. 2017, 36, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyfried, T.N.; Choi, H.; Chevalier, A.; Hogan, D.; Akgoc, Z.; Schneider, J.S. Sex-Related Abnormalities in Substantia Nigra Lipids in Parkinson’s Disease. ASN Neuro 2018, 10, 1759091418781889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dalrymple, W.A.; Pusso, A.; Sperling, S.A.; Flanigan, J.L.; Huss, D.S.; Harrison, M.B.; Elias, W.J.; Shah, B.B.; Barrett, M.J. Comparison of Parkinson’s Disease Patients’ Characteristics by Indication for Deep Brain Stimulation: Men Are More Likely to Have DBS for Tremor. Tremor Other Hyperkinetic Mov. 2019, 17, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.M.; Tickle-Degnen, L. Emotional cues from expressive behavior of women and men with Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamid, Z.; Basit, A.; Pontis, S.; Piras, F.; Assogna, F.; Bossù, P.; Pontieri, F.E.; Stefani, A.; Spalletta, G.; Franceschi, P.; et al. Gender specific decrease of a set of circulating N-acylphosphatidyl ethanolamines (NAPEs) in the plasma of Parkinson’s disease patients. Metabolomics 2019, 15, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Micco, R.; Esposito, F.; di Nardo, F.; Caiazzo, G.; Siciliano, M.; Russo, A.; Cirillo, M.; Tedeschi, G.; Tessitore, A. Sex-related pattern of intrinsic brain connectivity in drug-naïve Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov. Disord. 2019, 34, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pellecchia, M.T.; Picillo, M.; Russillo, M.C.; De Pandis, M.F.; Bonizzoni, E.; Marjanovic, I.; Cattaneo, C. Efficacy of Safinamide and Gender Differences During Routine Clinical Practice. Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 756304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Luo, Y.-J.; Gu, H.-Y.; Wang, Y.-M.; Liu, M.-H.; Li, K.; Li, J.; Zhuang, S.; Shen, Y.; Jin, H.; et al. Sex and onset-age-related features of excessive daytime sleepiness and night-time sleep in patients with Parkinson’s disease. BMC Neurol. 2021, 21, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakeberg, M.C.; Jefferson, A.; Riley, M.; Byrnes, M.; Ghosh, S.; Mastaglia, F.L.; Horne, M.K.; McGregor, S.; Stell, R.; Kenna, J.; et al. Elevated Serum Homocysteine Levels Have Differential Gender-Specific Associations with Motor and Cognitive States in Parkinson’s Disease. Parkinson’s Dis. 2019, 2019, 3124295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Georgiou, A.; Demetriou, C.A.; Heraclides, A.; Christou, Y.P.; Leonidou, E.; Loukaides, P.; Yiasoumi, E.; Panagiotou, D.; Manoli, P.; Thomson, P.; et al. Mitochondrial superclusters influence age of onset of Parkinson’s disease in a gender specific manner in the Cypriot population: A case-control study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fullard, M.E.; Thibault, D.P.; Todaro, V.; Foster, S.; Katz, L.; Morgan, R.; Kern, D.S.; Schwalb, J.M.; Mendoza, E.U.; Dahodwala, N.; et al. Sex disparities in health and health care utilization after Parkinson diagnosis: Rethinking PD associated disability. Park. Relat. Disord. 2017, 48, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cholerton, B.; Johnson, C.O.; Fish, B.; Quinn, J.F.; Chung, K.A.; Peterson-Hiller, A.L.; Rosenthal, L.S.; Dawson, T.M.; Albert, M.S.; Hu, S.C.; et al. Sex differences in progression to mild cognitive impairment and dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2018, 50, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q.; Liu, M.; Yu, M.; Fu, J. Sex differences in underweight and body mass index in Chinese early de novo patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain Behav. 2020, 10, e01893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picillo, M.; Palladino, R.; Erro, R.; Colosimo, C.; Marconi, R.; Antonini, A.; Barone, P. The PRIAMO study: Active sexual life is associated with better motor and non-motor outcomes in men with early Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2019, 26, 1327–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Picillo, M.; Palladino, R.; Erro, R.; Alfano, R.; Colosimo, C.; Marconi, R.; Antonini, A.; Barone, P.; Morgante, L.; Benincasa, D.; et al. The PRIAMO study: Age- and sex-related relationship between prodromal constipation and disease phenotype in early Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. 2021, 268, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porta, M.; Pilloni, G.; Arippa, F.; Casula, C.; Cossu, G.; Pau, M. Similarities and Differences of Gait Patterns in Women and Men with Parkinson Disease with Mild Disability. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2019, 100, 2039–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caplliure-Llopis, J.; Escrivá, D.; Navarro-Illana, E.; Benlloch, M.; de la Rubia Ortí, J.E.; Barrios, C. Bone Quality in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease Determined by Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) of the Calcaneus: Influence of Sex Differences. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusters, C.D.J.; Paul, K.C.; Duarte Folle, A.; Keener, A.M.; Bronstein, J.M.; Bertram, L.; Hansen, J.; Horvath, S.; Sinsheimer, J.S.; Lill, C.M.; et al. Increased Menopausal Age Reduces the Risk of Parkinson’s Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Approach. Mov. Disord. 2021, 36, 2264–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolmancic, K.; Perellón-Alfonso, R.; Pirtosek, Z.; Rothwell, J.C.; Bhatia, K.; Kojovic, M. Sex differences in Parkinson’s disease: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Mov. Disord. 2019, 34, 1873–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Savica, R.; Grossardt, B.R.; Rocca, W.A.; Bower, J.H. Parkinson disease with and without Dementia: A prevalence study and future projections. Mov. Disord. 2018, 33, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tremblay, C.; Abbasi, N.; Zeighami, Y.; Yau, Y.; Dadar, M.; Rahayel, S.; Dagher, A. Sex effects on brain structure in de novo Parkinson’s disease: A multimodal neuroimaging study. Brain 2020, 143, 3052–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, D.; Jin, Z.; Gao, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Fang, J.; Qi, L.; Su, Y.; Liu, A.; Fang, B. The quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Focus on gender difference. Brain Behav. 2022, 12, e2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rusz, J.; Tykalová, T.; Novotný, M.; Zogala, D.; Růžička, E.; Dušek, P. Automated speech analysis in early untreated Parkinson’s disease: Relation to gender and dopaminergic transporter imaging. Eur. J. Neurol. 2022, 29, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sperens, M.; Georgiev, D.; Eriksson Domellöf, M.; Forsgren, L.; Hamberg, K.; Hariz, G.M. Activities of daily living in Parkinson’s disease: Time/gender perspective. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2020, 141, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, J.-E.; Kim, J.S.; Jang, W.; Park, J.; Oh, E.; Youn, J.; Park, S.; Cho, J.W. Gender Differences of Nonmotor Symptoms Affecting Quality of Life in Parkinson Disease. Neurodegener. Dis. 2017, 17, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iwaki, H.; Blauwendraat, C.; Ms, H.L.L.; Ba, M.B.M.; Ba, J.J.K.; Liu, G.; Maple-Grødem, J.; Corvol, J.; Pihlstrøm, L.; Van Nimwegen, M.; et al. Differences in the Presentation and Progression of Parkinson’s Disease by Sex. Mov. Disord. 2021, 36, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dluzen, D.E.; McDermott, J.L.; Liu, B. Estrogen as a neuroprotectant against MPTP-induced neurotoxicity in C57/B1 mice. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 1996, 18, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, L.; Liao, P.C. Sexual differences and estrous cycle in methamphetamine-induced dopamine and serotonin depletions in the striatum of mice. J. Neural. Transm. 2000, 107, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourque, M.; Liu, B.; Dluzen, D.E.; Di Paolo, T. Sex differences in methamphetamine toxicity in mice: Effect on brain dopamine signaling pathways. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2011, 36, 955–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Miranda, B.R.; Fazzari, M.; Rocha, E.M.; Castro, S.; Greenamyre, J.T. Sex Differences in Rotenone Sensitivity Reflect the Male-to-Female Ratio in Human Parkinson’s Disease Incidence. Toxicol. Sci. 2019, 170, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Astous, M.; Morissette, M.; Tanguay, B.; Callier, S.; Di Paolo, T. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) such as 17beta-estradiol prevents MPTP-induced dopamine depletion in mice. Synapse 2003, 47, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grandbois, M.; Morissette, M.; Callier, S.; Di Paolo, T. Ovarian steroids and raloxifene prevent MPTP-induced dopamine depletion in mice. Neuroreport 2000, 11, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bispo, J.M.; Melo, J.E.; de Gois, A.M.; Leal, P.C.; Lins, L.C.; Souza, M.F.; Medeiros, K.A.; Ribeiro, A.M.; Silva, R.H.; Marchioro, M.; et al. Sex differences in the progressive model of parkinsonism induced by reserpine in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2019, 363, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima, A.C.; Meurer, Y.S.R.; Bioni, V.S.; Cunha, D.M.G.; Gonçalves, N.; Lopes-Silva, L.B.; Becegato, M.; Soares, M.B.L.; Marinho, G.F.; Santos, J.R.; et al. Female Rats Are Resistant to Cognitive, Motor and Dopaminergic Deficits in the Reserpine-Induced Progressive Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 757714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekstrand, M.I.; Terzioglu, M.; Galter, D.; Zhu, S.; Hofstetter, C.; Lindqvist, E.; Thams, S.; Bergstrand, A.; Hansson, F.S.; Trifunovic, A.; et al. Progressive parkinsonism in mice with respiratory-chain-deficient dopamine neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1325–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, Y.-H.; Wang, V.; Huang, E.Y.-K.; Chou, Y.-C.; Kuo, T.-T.; Olson, L.; Hoffer, B.J. Delayed Dopamine Dysfunction and Motor Deficits in Female Parkinson Model Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bourque, M.; Soulet, D.; Di Paolo, T. Androgens and Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Human Studies and Animal Models. Androg. Clin. Res. Ther. 2021, 2, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conner, M.R.; Jang, D.; Anderson, B.J.; Kritzer, M.F. Biological Sex and Sex Hormone Impacts on Deficits in Episodic-Like Memory in a Rat Model of Early, Pre-motor Stages of Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Betancourt, E.; Wachtel, J.; Michaelos, M.; Haggerty, M.; Conforti, J.; Kritzer, M.F. The impact of biological sex and sex hormones on cognition in a rat model of early, pre-motor Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience 2017, 345, 297–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidransky, E.; Nalls, M.; Aasly, J.; Aharon-Peretz, J.; Annesi, G.; Barbosa, E.; Bar-Shira, A.; Berg, D.; Bras, J.; Brice, A.; et al. Multicenter analysis of glucocerebrosidase mutations in Parkinson’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 1651–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, Q.; Jing, Y.; Lun, P.; Liu, X.; Sun, P. Association of gender and age at onset with glucocerebrosidase associated Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 42, 2261–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dächsel, J.C.; Farrer, M.J. LRRK2 and Parkinson disease. Arch. Neurol. 2010, 67, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cilia, R.; Siri, C.; Rusconi, D.; Allegra, R.; Ghiglietti, A.; Sacilotto, G.; Zini, M.; Zecchinelli, A.L.; Asselta, R.; Duga, S.; et al. LRRK2 mutations in Parkinson’s disease: Confirmation of a gender effect in the Italian population. Park. Relat. Disord. 2014, 20, 911–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, S.-S.; Fu, R.; Du, J.-J.; Lin, Y.-Q.; Huang, P.; Gao, C.; Zhou, H.-Y.; Chen, S.-D. Sex effects on clinical features in LRRK2 G2385R carriers and non-carriers in Parkinson’s disease. BMC Neurosci. 2021, 22, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelzer, E.A.; Stürmer, S.; Feis, D.-L.; Melzer, C.; Schwartz, F.; Scharge, M.; Eggers, C.; Tittgemeyer, M.; Timmermann, L. Clustering of Parkinson subtypes reveals strong influence of DRD2 polymorphism and gender. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ping, Z.; Xiaomu, W.; Xufang, X.; Wenfeng, C.; Liang, S.; Tao, W. GAPDH rs1136666 SNP indicates a high risk of Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 685, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hall, D.A.; Nag, S.; Ouyang, B.; Bennett, D.A.; Liu, Y.; Ali, A.; Zhou, L.; Berry-Kravis, E. Fragile X Gray Zone Alleles Are Associated with Signs of Parkinsonism and Earlier Death. Mov. Disord. 2020, 35, 1448–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortese, M.; Riise, T.; Engeland, A.; Ascherio, A.; Bjørnevik, K. Urate and the risk of Parkinson’s disease in men and women. Park. Relat. Disord. 2018, 52, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haaxma, C.A.; Bloem, B.R.; Borm, G.F.; Oyen, W.J.G.; Leenders, K.L.; Eshuis, S.; Booij, J.; Dluzen, E.D.; Horstink, M.W.I.M. Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007, 78, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wise, E.A.; Price, D.D.; Myers, C.D.; Heft, M.W.; Robinson, M.E. Gender role expectations of pain: Relationship to experimental pain perception. Pain 2002, 96, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wandner, L.D.; Scipio, C.D.; Hirsh, A.T.; Torres, C.A.; Robinson, M.E. The perception of pain in others: How gender, race, and age influence pain expectations. J. Pain 2012, 13, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fillingim, R.B.; King, C.D.; Ribeiro-Dasilva, M.C.; Rahim-Williams, B.; Riley, J.L., III. Sex, gender, and pain: A review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J. Pain 2009, 10, 447–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kumagai, T.; Nagayama, H.; Ota, T.; Nishiyama, Y.; Mishina, M.; Ueda, M. Sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of levodopa in elderly patients with Parkinson disease. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2014, 37, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martinelli, P.; Contin, M.; Scaglione, C.; Riva, R.; Albani, F.; Baruzzi, A. Levodopa pharmacokinetics and dyskinesias: Are there sex-related differences? Neurol. Sci. 2003, 24, 192–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olanow, C.W.; Kieburtz, K.; Rascol, O.; Poewe, W.; Schapira, A.H.; Emre, M.; Nissinen, H.; Leinonen, M.; Stocchi, F. Factors predictive of the development of Levodopa-induced dyskinesia and wearing-off in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2013, 28, 1064–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez-Ramirez, D.; Giugni, J.; Vedam-Mai, V.; Shukla, A.W.; Malaty, I.A.; McFarland, N.; Rodriguez, R.L.; Foote, K.; Okun, M. The “brittle response” to Parkinson’s disease medications: Characterization and response to deep brain stimulation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conti, V.; Izzo, V.; Russillo, M.C.; Picillo, M.; Amboni, M.; Scaglione, C.L.M.; Nicoletti, A.; Cani, I.; Cicero, C.E.; De Bellis, E.; et al. Gender Differences in Levodopa Pharmacokinetics in Levodopa-Naïve Patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 909936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onofrj, M.; Bonanni, L.; Thomas, A. An expert opinion on safinamide in Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2008, 17, 1115–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwarzschild, M.A.; Schwid, S.R.; Marek, K.; Watts, A.; Lang, A.E.; Oakes, D.; Shoulson, I.; Ascherio, A.; Parkinson Study Group PRECEPT Investigators; Hyson, C.; et al. Serum urate as a predictor of clinical and radiographic progression in Parkinson disease. Arch. Neurol. 2008, 65, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Müller, T.; Muhlack, S.; Woitalla, D. Pain perception, pain drug therapy and health status in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neuroepidemiology 2011, 37, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jost, S.T.; Strobel, L.; Rizos, A.; Loehrer, P.A.; Ashkan, K.; Evans, J.; Rosenkranz, F.; Barbe, M.T.; Fink, G.R.; Franklin, J.; et al. Gender gap in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Npj. Park. Dis. 2022, 8, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hariz, G.-M.; Limousin, P.; Zrinzo, L.; Tripoliti, E.; Aviles-Olmos, I.; Jahanshahi, M.; Hamberg, K.; Foltynie, T. Gender differences in quality of life following subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2013, 128, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).