Next Article in Journal
A Virtual Impedance Control Strategy for Improving the Stability and Dynamic Performance of VSC–HVDC Operation in Bidirectional Power Flow Mode
Next Article in Special Issue
Upper Limb Robotics in Rehabilitation: An Approach to Select the Devices, Based on Rehabilitation Aims, and Their Evaluation in a Feasibility Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Spatial Perspective in Post-Earthquake Evaluation to Improve Mitigation Strategies: Geostatistical Analysis of the Seismic Damage Applied to a Real Case Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exoskeleton for Gait Rehabilitation: Effects of Assistance, Mechanical Structure, and Walking Aids on Muscle Activations

Perspectives and Challenges in Robotic Neurorehabilitation

Rehab Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy
Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Melen 83, 16152 Genova, Italy
Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and System Engineering, University of Genova, Viale Causa 13, 16145 Genova, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Equal second author.
Equal last author.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(15), 3183;
Received: 31 May 2019 / Revised: 25 July 2019 / Accepted: 31 July 2019 / Published: 5 August 2019
The development of robotic devices for rehabilitation is a fast-growing field. Nowadays, thanks to novel technologies that have improved robots’ capabilities and offered more cost-effective solutions, robotic devices are increasingly being employed during clinical practice, with the goal of boosting patients’ recovery. Robotic rehabilitation is also widely used in the context of neurological disorders, where it is often provided in a variety of different fashions, depending on the specific function to be restored. Indeed, the effect of robot-aided neurorehabilitation can be maximized when used in combination with a proper training regimen (based on motor control paradigms) or with non-invasive brain machine interfaces. Therapy-induced changes in neural activity and behavioral performance, which may suggest underlying changes in neural plasticity, can be quantified by multimodal assessments of both sensorimotor performance and brain/muscular activity pre/post or during intervention. Here, we provide an overview of the most common robotic devices for upper and lower limb rehabilitation and we describe the aforementioned neurorehabilitation scenarios. We also review assessment techniques for the evaluation of robotic therapy. Additional exploitation of these research areas will highlight the crucial contribution of rehabilitation robotics for promoting recovery and answering questions about reorganization of brain functions in response to disease. View Full-Text
Keywords: electrophysiological recordings; end-effector robot; exoskeleton; neuroimaging; robotic rehabilitation; sensorimotor assessment electrophysiological recordings; end-effector robot; exoskeleton; neuroimaging; robotic rehabilitation; sensorimotor assessment
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Iandolo, R.; Marini, F.; Semprini, M.; Laffranchi, M.; Mugnosso, M.; Cherif, A.; De Michieli, L.; Chiappalone, M.; Zenzeri, J. Perspectives and Challenges in Robotic Neurorehabilitation. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3183.

AMA Style

Iandolo R, Marini F, Semprini M, Laffranchi M, Mugnosso M, Cherif A, De Michieli L, Chiappalone M, Zenzeri J. Perspectives and Challenges in Robotic Neurorehabilitation. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(15):3183.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iandolo, Riccardo, Francesca Marini, Marianna Semprini, Matteo Laffranchi, Maddalena Mugnosso, Amel Cherif, Lorenzo De Michieli, Michela Chiappalone, and Jacopo Zenzeri. 2019. "Perspectives and Challenges in Robotic Neurorehabilitation" Applied Sciences 9, no. 15: 3183.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop