You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Applied Sciences
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

12 December 2025

Inside the Playbook: Tactical Signatures of Winning Teams in the NBA

,
,
and
1
Grupo de Optimización del Entrenamiento y Rendimiento Deportivo (GOERD), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
2
Instituto de Investigación e Innovación del Deporte (INIDE), Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
3
Grupo de Actividad Física, Calidad de Vida y Salud (AFYCAV), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci.2025, 15(24), 13121;https://doi.org/10.3390/app152413121 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Studies in Ball Sports Performance

Abstract

Basketball preparation has shifted from a physical and technical focus to a holistic approach that incorporates performance analysis, as traditional statistics offer only a limited understanding of team behavior. This study aimed to characterize NBA teams according to their performance in regular season and play-off games and to identify the play types that distinguish the best-performing teams in each phase. Data from five NBA seasons (2019–2024; 6400 games) were analyzed using play-type statistics obtained from the official league database. Two-step cluster analysis and one-way analyses of variance with Bonferroni correction were applied to identify group differences (p < 0.05). Three team clusters were identified in both the regular season and the play-offs. High-performing teams in the regular season were significantly more effective in isolation (p < 0.01) and spot-up (p = 0.03) situations and showed greater use of pick-and-roll ball-handler actions (p = 0.001). In the play-offs, differences were smaller and mainly involved low-performing teams, which were less effective in transition and spot-up plays (p < 0.05). Comparisons between the best regular season and play-off teams revealed significant differences in post-up, off-screen, and put-back efficiency (p < 0.05). Success depended primarily on execution efficiency rather than play-type frequency.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.