Next Article in Journal
Data-Driven Settlement Prediction for Pavements on Tunis Soft Clay Improved with Deep Soil Mixing: Artificial Intelligence and Response Surface Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
Manganese-Induced Alleviation of Cadmium Stress in Rice Seedlings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Optimizing Timber Roof Diaphragms for Seismic Damping in the Retrofit of Masonry Churches

1
Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering Department, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
2
Department Engineering and Architecture, Università degli Studi di Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(23), 12705; https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312705
Submission received: 30 October 2025 / Revised: 12 November 2025 / Accepted: 14 November 2025 / Published: 30 November 2025

Abstract

This paper addresses the seismic retrofitting of masonry churches with timber roofs by designing a ductile roof diaphragm with a new energy-based methodology. The proposed approach relies on nonlinear dynamic analyses conducted on an equivalent structural model. In this model, masonry nonlinearity is represented by rotational plastic hinges at the base of the equivalent wall elements. Roof system nonlinearity is modeled by shear plastic hinges simulating the energy dissipation of steel connections. In the equivalent model, the earthquake is implemented using a set of spectrum-compatible accelerograms. The dynamic response of the aforementioned plastic hinges is analyzed in terms of equivalent damping during the seismic events by extracting the relevant hysteresis cycles. This allows for the evaluation of both dissipated and strain energy. The estimation of the equivalent damping ratio provided by the roof diaphragm is based on multiple design configurations. After identifying the maximum achievable damping ratio, the study suggests ways to determine the corresponding roof stiffness, which defines the optimal retrofit configuration. This configuration is then implemented in a three-dimensional model that includes nonlinear properties for both masonry and connection elements, allowing a validation of the seismic response obtained from the initial equivalent model with a more complex and detailed model. Finally, a seismic response comparison is conducted between the optimized dissipated energy configuration, based on damping ratio evaluation, and an overstrength design variant determined considering the elastic behavior of the roof connections.
Keywords: historical buildings; churches retrofit; equivalent damping; seismic vulnerability; nave transversal response; energy dissipation; seismic retrofitting historical buildings; churches retrofit; equivalent damping; seismic vulnerability; nave transversal response; energy dissipation; seismic retrofitting

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Longarini, N.; Crespi, P.; Cabras, L. Optimizing Timber Roof Diaphragms for Seismic Damping in the Retrofit of Masonry Churches. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 12705. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312705

AMA Style

Longarini N, Crespi P, Cabras L. Optimizing Timber Roof Diaphragms for Seismic Damping in the Retrofit of Masonry Churches. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(23):12705. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312705

Chicago/Turabian Style

Longarini, Nicola, Pietro Crespi, and Luigi Cabras. 2025. "Optimizing Timber Roof Diaphragms for Seismic Damping in the Retrofit of Masonry Churches" Applied Sciences 15, no. 23: 12705. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312705

APA Style

Longarini, N., Crespi, P., & Cabras, L. (2025). Optimizing Timber Roof Diaphragms for Seismic Damping in the Retrofit of Masonry Churches. Applied Sciences, 15(23), 12705. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312705

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop