You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Applied Sciences
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

11 November 2025

Assessing the Risk of Damage to Underground Utilities Caused by Spatial Data Quality with Fuzzy Logic

and
1
Department of Geodesy, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 21 Street, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Integrated Geodesy and Cartography, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Krakow AGH University of Science and Technology,Mickiewicza 30 Street, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering

Abstract

One of the sources of risk inherent to construction projects is the quality of spatial data. Damage to buried pipes and cables often causes accidents, delays, or stoppages of construction works. Fuzzy logic is a method for studying the risk. It is employed to describe complex or poorly defined phenomena that can hardly be characterised with probabilistic methods. The article proposes a method for assessing the risk of damaging underground utilities based on a fuzzy inference engine. The author first defined linguistic variables and assigned them values based on risk factors. The membership functions for the linguistic variables were modelled using expert judgement. Then, the author determined qualitative fuzzy sets with the rule base. Finally, the values were converted into crisp values. The defuzzification technique employed was the centre of gravity. The proposed method can assess the risk of damage to underground utilities for spatial data exhibiting diverse quality classes. It will be employed to generate large-scale risk maps. The proposed fuzzy logic solution is an effective and appropriate tool for assessing the risk of damage to underground utilities arising from the quality of subsurface data. It should not be regarded as a universal substitute for PRA (Probabilistic Risk Assessment) but as a complementary methodology that is particularly well-suited to risk assessment in data-poor environments characterised by epistemic uncertainty and reliance on qualitative expert judgement.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.