Next Article in Journal
Diffusion-Inspired Masked Language Modeling for Symbolic Harmony Generation on a Fixed Time Grid
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting Constitutive Behaviour of Idealized Granular Soils Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
“Habari, Colleague!”: A Qualitative Exploration of the Perceptions of Primary School Mathematics Teachers in Tanzania Regarding the Use of Social Robots
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Contactless Pulse Rate Assessment: Results and Insights for Application in Driving Simulators

by
Đorđe D. Nešković
1,2,
Kristina Stojmenova Pečečnik
3,
Jaka Sodnik
3,* and
Nadica Miljković
1,3
1
School of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences—National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11351 Belgrade, Serbia
3
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(17), 9512; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179512 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 July 2025 / Revised: 5 August 2025 / Accepted: 27 August 2025 / Published: 29 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Human–Machine Interaction)

Abstract

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) offers a promising solution for non-contact driver monitoring by detecting subtle blood flow-induced facial color changes from video. However, motion artifacts in dynamic driving environments remain key challenges. This study presents an rPPG framework that combines signal processing techniques before and after applying Eulerian Video Magnification (EVM) for pulse rate (PR) estimation in driving simulators. While not novel, the approach offers insights into the efficiency of the EVM method and its time complexity. We compare results of the proposed rPPG approach against reference Empatica E4 data and also compare it with existing achievements from the literature. Additionally, the possible bias of the Empatica E4 is further assessed using an independent dataset with both the Empatica E4 and the Faros 360 measurements. EVM slightly improves PR estimation, reducing the mean absolute error (MAE) from 6.48 bpm to 5.04 bpm (the lowest MAE (~2 bpm) was achieved under strict conditions) with an additional time required for EVM of about 20 s for 30 s sequence. Furthermore, statistically significant differences are identified between younger and older drivers in both reference and rPPG data. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of using rPPG-based PR monitoring, encouraging further research in driving simulations.
Keywords: driving simulator; motion artifacts; non-contact measurements; pulse rate; remote photoplethysmography; skin color variations driving simulator; motion artifacts; non-contact measurements; pulse rate; remote photoplethysmography; skin color variations

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nešković, Đ.D.; Stojmenova Pečečnik, K.; Sodnik, J.; Miljković, N. Contactless Pulse Rate Assessment: Results and Insights for Application in Driving Simulators. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 9512. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179512

AMA Style

Nešković ĐD, Stojmenova Pečečnik K, Sodnik J, Miljković N. Contactless Pulse Rate Assessment: Results and Insights for Application in Driving Simulators. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(17):9512. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179512

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nešković, Đorđe D., Kristina Stojmenova Pečečnik, Jaka Sodnik, and Nadica Miljković. 2025. "Contactless Pulse Rate Assessment: Results and Insights for Application in Driving Simulators" Applied Sciences 15, no. 17: 9512. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179512

APA Style

Nešković, Đ. D., Stojmenova Pečečnik, K., Sodnik, J., & Miljković, N. (2025). Contactless Pulse Rate Assessment: Results and Insights for Application in Driving Simulators. Applied Sciences, 15(17), 9512. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179512

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop