This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Comparison of Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs and Bleeding on Probing in Partial- and Full-Mouth Examinations for Assessing Children’s Gingival Status: A Cross-Sectional Study
by
Hristina Tankova
Hristina Tankova *
and
Nadezhda Mitova
Nadezhda Mitova
Department of Pediatric Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(17), 9408; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179408 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 August 2025
/
Revised: 18 August 2025
/
Accepted: 26 August 2025
/
Published: 27 August 2025
Abstract
Background: The asymptomatic progression of initial gingival inflammation in children often remains unnoticed or undiagnosed. Although full-mouth periodontal examination is considered the gold standard in diagnosing periodontal diseases, it is usually time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess gingival status using partial-mouth examination with the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN) and full-mouth examination with Bleeding on Probing (BOP) in the periodontal diagnosis of adolescents. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 457 Bulgarian children aged 11 to 14 years. Full-mouth examination was performed with the BOP index on all fully erupted permanent teeth, probing four gingival sites––three buccal and one oral. Partial-mouth examination was performed with CPITN, probing six representative teeth at six sites. Statistical analysis was conducted using Pearson’s chi-square test (χ2) and t-tests to compare relative proportions. Results: The BOP index identified significantly more healthy children compared to the CPITN (t = 1.90, p < 0.05). The CPITN has limitations in distinguishing between initial (BOP 10–30%) and advanced (BOP 30–60%) gingival inflammation. The comparative evaluation of the two indices by sextant showed that a healthy periodontium is most commonly observed in the posterior segments of both jaws in children, while gingival inflammation is localized predominantly in frontal areas. Conclusions: The CPITN has the advantage of providing a quick and easy method for recording gingival status in children, but it does not allow for the determination of the severity of gingival inflammation. Clinical significance: Full-mouth examination using the BOP index is a more appropriate method for periodontal diagnosis in children, as it provides a detailed and comprehensive picture of the condition of the gingival tissues, especially when a clinical diagnosis is required to guide further treatment planning.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Tankova, H.; Mitova, N.
Comparison of Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs and Bleeding on Probing in Partial- and Full-Mouth Examinations for Assessing Children’s Gingival Status: A Cross-Sectional Study. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 9408.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179408
AMA Style
Tankova H, Mitova N.
Comparison of Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs and Bleeding on Probing in Partial- and Full-Mouth Examinations for Assessing Children’s Gingival Status: A Cross-Sectional Study. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(17):9408.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179408
Chicago/Turabian Style
Tankova, Hristina, and Nadezhda Mitova.
2025. "Comparison of Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs and Bleeding on Probing in Partial- and Full-Mouth Examinations for Assessing Children’s Gingival Status: A Cross-Sectional Study" Applied Sciences 15, no. 17: 9408.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179408
APA Style
Tankova, H., & Mitova, N.
(2025). Comparison of Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs and Bleeding on Probing in Partial- and Full-Mouth Examinations for Assessing Children’s Gingival Status: A Cross-Sectional Study. Applied Sciences, 15(17), 9408.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179408
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.